Search

Questions: Are the vegetation structure and soil properties of fallows similar to adjacent species‐rich Mediterranean steppe communities 35 years after abandonment? Is there a spontaneous redevelopment towards the original steppe vegetation after reintroduction of the traditional grazing system? Can differences in functional trait composition be identified according to different land‐use types? Do traits of selected species affect the ability to recolonize fallow land? Location: Mediterranean steppe of La Crau (Southeastern France). Methods: We conducted 80 vegetation surveys and soil analyses in the steppe and adjacent fallow land in six locations in La Crau in 2015; for three locations, data from 2001 were included. To compare the functional composition of steppe vs fallow land, community‐weighted means (CMW) of specific leaf area (SLA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC) and canopy height were calculated. To test whether trait variability is associated with the recolonization success of 12 selected target species, we measured SLA, LDMC, canopy height, plant width and aboveground biomass on eight replicate individuals per site and species. Results: Fallow land was characterized by lower species richness and elevated phosphorus and potassium content in the soil. Comparing vegetation relevés between 2001 and 2015 revealed that the fallows were developing towards steppe vegetation. CWMs of SLA were significantly lower and CWM of LDMC higher in steppe than in fallow land. There was no similarity in trait composition between steppe species that successfully recolonized the fallow‐land community, and no evidence that intraspecific trait variability is associated with recolonization success of these species. Conclusions: Even after decades of abandonment and reintroduction of the grazing system, the vegetation structure, soil properties and plant functional trait composition of fallows differ from those of adjacent steppe communities. These results illustrate the need for active restoration to accelerate the recovery of former arable land to the target steppe communities. We combined a taxonomic with a trait‐based approach to assess the recovery of a Mediterranean steppe vegetation decades after melon and cereal cultivation has taken place. Steppe (left picture) and fallows (right picture) still differ in vegetation attributes, soil properties and plant functional trait composition. These results illustrate the need for active restoration to accelerate the recovery of fallows to the target steppe communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Plant invasions can drastically change the structure of native communities, but it is not fully understood whether alien species occupy phylogenetic and functional space within the range occupied by natives, or provide a novel set of evolutionary origins and traits to the invaded communities.Here, we evaluated this open question with data on a large number of plant communities from different terrestrial habitats. We used ~27,000 vegetation plots from 26 terrestrial habitats in the Czech Republic and compared phylogenetic and functional diversity (PD and FD, respectively) and community trait means in invaded and non‐invaded plots. We tested for differences (1) between invaded vs. non‐invaded plots, (2) among natives in invaded vs. non‐invaded plots, and (3) in invaded plots only, with and without aliens. To minimize habitat filtering effects on PD and FD, we ran these tests within the habitat‐specific species pools of the 26 vegetation types.In general, PD, FD and trait mean values changed with invasion, with changes being rather consistent across the habitats considered. Invaded plots were less phylogenetically, but more functionally diverse than non‐invaded plots. The greater FD in invaded plots, compared to non‐invaded ones, was due to greater dissimilarity between natives. In fact, native species in invaded plots showed higher PD and FD than native species in non‐invaded plots, while alien species reduced PD and FD in invaded plots. Changes in the trait means with invasion were due to differences in native species in invaded and non‐invaded plots, rather than to an effect of alien species. Within most habitats, the trait means and variance of all aliens were similar to those of all natives, while in some habitats, the variability in traits was greater between aliens that belonged to phylogenetically closer clades.Synthesis. Our results suggest that alien species more often occupy a phylogenetic and functional space within the range formed by the native species in a community. They do so either by filling empty gaps or by excluding natives from the existing phylogenetic and functional space, rather than occupying or creating a phylogenetic and trait space outside of it. Our results suggest that alien species more often occupy a phylogenetic and functional space within the range formed by the native species in a community. They do so either by filling empty gaps or by excluding natives from the existing phylogenetic and functional space, rather than occupying or creating a phylogenetic and trait space outside of it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]