Search

In his classical textbook on algebraic topology Edwin Spanier developed the theory of covering spaces within a more general framework of lifting spaces (i.e., Hurewicz fibrations with unique path-lifting property). Among other, Spanier proved that for every space $X$ there exists a universal lifting space, which however need not be simply connected, unless the base space $X$ is semi-locally simply connected. The question on what exactly is the fundamental group of the universal space was left unanswered. The main source of lifting spaces are inverse limits of covering spaces over $X$, or more generally, over some inverse system of spaces converging to $X$. Every metric space $X$ can be obtained as a limit of an inverse system of polyhedra, and so inverse limits of covering spaces over the system yield lifting spaces over $X$. They are related to the geometry (in particular the fundamental group) of $X$ in a similar way as the covering spaces over polyhedra are related to the fundamental group of their base. Thus lifting spaces appear as a natural replacement for the concept of covering spaces over base spaces with bad local properties. In this paper we develop a general theory of lifting spaces and prove that they are preserved by products, inverse limits and other important constructions. We show that maps from $X$ to polyhedra give rise to coverings over $X$ and use that to prove that for a connected, locally path connected and paracompact $X$, the fundamental group of the above-mentioned Spanier's universal space is precisely the intersection of all Spanier groups associated to open covers of $X$, and that the later coincides with the shape kernel of $X$. Furthermore, we examine in more detail lifting spaces over $X$ that arise as inverse limits of coverings over some approximations of $X$.

We study a natural generalization of inverse systems of finite regular covering spaces. A limit of such a system is a fibration whose fibres are profinite topological groups. However, as shown in a previous paper (Conner-Herfort-Pavesic: Some anomalous examples of lifting spaces), there are many fibrations whose fibres are profinite groups, which are far from being inverse limits of coverings. We characterize profinite fibrations among a large class of fibrations and relate the profinite topology on the fundamental group of the base with the action of the fundamental group on the fibre, and develop a version of the Borel construction for fibrations whose fibres are profinite groups.

We present new results regarding automatic continuity, unifying some diagonalization concepts that have been developed over the years. For example, any homomorphism from a completely metrizable topological group to Thompson's group $F$ has open kernel. A similar claim holds when $F$ is replaced with a Baumslag-Solitar group or a torsion-free word hyperbolic group.

An inverse limit of a sequence of covering spaces over a given space $X$ is not, in general, a covering space over $X$ but is still a lifting space, i.e. a Hurewicz fibration with unique path lifting property. Of particular interest are inverse limits of finite coverings (resp. finite regular coverings), which yield fibrations whose fiber is homeomorphic to the Cantor set (resp. profinite topological group). To illustrate the breadth of the theory, we present in this note some curious examples of lifting spaces that cannot be obtained as inverse limits of covering spaces., Comment: To the Memory of Professor Sibe Marde\v{s}i\'{c}

We show that the first homology group of a locally connected compact metric space is either uncountable or is finitely generated. This is related to Shelah's well-known result which shows that the fundamental group of such a space satisfies a similar criterion. We give an example of such a space whose fundamental group is uncountable but whose first homology is trivial, showing that our result doesn't follow from Shelah's. We clarify a claim made by Pawlikowski and offer a proof of the clarification.

The classical archipelago is a non-contractible subset of $\mathbb{R}^3$ which is homeomorphic to a disk except at one non-manifold point. Its fundamental group, $\mathcal{A}$, is the quotient of the topologist's product of $\mathbb Z$, the fundamental group of the shrinking wedge of countably many copies of the circle (the Hawaiian earring), modulo the corresponding free product. We show $\mathcal{A}$ is locally free, not indicable, and has the rationals both as a subgroup and a quotient group. Replacing $\mathbb Z$ with arbitrary groups yields the notion of archipelago groups. Surprisingly, every archipelago of countable groups is isomorphic to either $\mathcal{A}(\mathbb Z)$ or $\mathcal{A}(\mathbb Z_2)$, the cases where the archipelago is built from circles or projective planes respectively. We conjecture that these two groups are isomorphic and prove that for large enough cardinalities of $G_i$, $\mathcal{A}(G_i)$ is not isomorphic to either.

Guided by classical concepts, we define the notion of \emph{ends} of an iterated function system and prove that the number of ends is an upper bound for the number of nondegenerate components of its attractor. The remaining isolated points are then linked to idempotent maps. A commutative diagram illustrates the natural relationships between the infinite walks in a semigroup and components of an attractor in more detail. We show in particular that, if an iterated function system is one-ended, the associated attractor is connected, and ask whether every connected attractor (fractal) conversely admits a one-ended system.

This paper studies closed 3-manifolds which are the attractors of a system of finitely many affine contractions that tile $\mathbb{R}^3$. Such attractors are called self-affine tiles. Effective characterization and recognition theorems for these 3-manifolds as well as theoretical generalizations of these results to higher dimensions are established. The methods developed build a bridge linking geometric topology with iterated function systems and their attractors. A method to model self-affine tiles by simple iterative systems is developed in order to study their topology. The model is functorial in the sense that there is an easily computable map that induces isomorphisms between the natural subdivisions of the attractor of the model and the self-affine tile. It has many beneficial qualities including ease of computation allowing one to determine topological properties of the attractor of the model such as connectedness and whether it is a manifold. The induced map between the attractor of the model and the self-affine tile is a quotient map and can be checked in certain cases to be monotone or cell-like. Deep theorems from geometric topology are applied to characterize and develop algorithms to recognize when a self-affine tile is a topological or generalized manifold in all dimensions. These new tools are used to check that several self-affine tiles in the literature are 3-balls. An example of a wild 3-dimensional self-affine tile is given whose boundary is a topological 2-sphere but which is not itself a 3-ball. The paper describes how any 3-dimensional handlebody can be given the structure of a self-affine 3-manifold. It is conjectured that every self-affine tile which is a manifold is a handlebody., Comment: 40 pages, 13 figures, 2 tables

We say A is a quasi-normal subgroup of the group G if the commensurator of A in G is all of G. We develop geometric versions of commensurators in finitely generated groups. In particular, g is an element of the commensurator of A in G iff the Hausdorff distance between A and gA is finite. We show that a quasi-normal subgroup of a group is the kernel of a certain map, and a subgroup of a finitely generated group is quasi-normal iff the natural coset graph is locally finite. This last equivalence is particularly useful for deriving asymptotic results for finitely generated groups. Our primary goal in this paper is to develop the basic theory of quasi-normal subgroups, comparing analogous results for normal subgroups and isolating differences between quasi-normal and normal subgroups., Comment: 23 pages, 0 figures