Search

The dynamic colon model isa biorelevant in vitro model of the human proximal colon. In vivo, the large intestine mixes its contents using peristaltic waves that propagate both forwards(antegrade) and backwards (retrograde). This work studies the dissolution profile of theophylline from Uniphyllin Continus 200 mg prolonged release tablets and the distribution of dissolved theophylline in viscosity-enhanced media under the influence of a cyclic retrograde peristaltic contraction. At 16-and 24-hours, and theophylline dissolved from the tablet and the fluid inside the mimic intestinal system approached homogeneity.

A physiologically based biopharmaceutic model (PBBM) of a modified-release formulation of theophylline (Uniphyllin Continus® 200 mg tablet) was developed and implemented to predict the pharmacokinetic (PK) data of healthy male volunteers by integrating dissolution profiles measured in a biorelevant in vitro model: the Dynamic Colon Model (DCM). The superiority of the DCM over the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Apparatus II (USP II) was demonstrated by the superior predictions for the 200 mg tablet (average absolute fold error (AAFE): 1.1–1.3 (DCM) vs. 1.3–1.5 (USP II). The best predictions were obtained using the three motility patterns (antegrade and retrograde propagating waves, baseline) in the DCM, which produced similar PK profiles. However, extensive erosion of the tablet occurred at all agitation speeds used in USP II (25, 50 and 100 rpm), resulting in an increased drug release rate in vitro and overpredicted PK data. The PK data of the Uniphyllin Continus® 400 mg tablet could not be predicted with the same accuracy using dissolution profiles from the DCM, which might be explained by differences in upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract residence times between the 200 and 400 mg tablets. Thus, it is recommended that the DCM be used for dosage forms in which the main release phenomena take place in the distal GI tract. However, the DCM again showed a better performance based on the overall AAFE compared to the USP II. Regional dissolution profiles within the DCM cannot currently be integrated into Simcyp®, which might limit the predictivity of the DCM. Thus, further compartmentalization of the colon within PBBM platforms is required to account for observed intra-regional differences in drug distribution.

The in vitro release of theophylline from an extended-release dosage form was studied under different hydrodynamic conditions in a United States Pharmacopoeial (USP) dissolution system II and a bespoke in vitro tubular model of the human colon, the Dynamic Colon Model (DCM). Five biorelevant motility patterns extracted from in vivo data were applied to the DCM, mimicking the human proximal colon under baseline conditions and following stimulation using polyethylene glycol or maltose; these represent the lower and upper bounds of motility normally expected in vivo. In the USPII, tablet dissolution was affected by changing hydrodynamic conditions at different agitation speeds of 25, 50 and 100 rpm. Applying different motility patterns in the DCM affected the dissolution profiles produced, with theophylline release at 24 h ranging from 56.74 ± 2.00% (baseline) to 96.74 ± 9.63% (maltose-stimulated). The concentration profiles of theophylline were markedly localized when measured at different segments of the DCM tube, highlighting the importance of a segmented lumen in intestine models and in generating spatial information to support simple temporal dissolution profiles. The results suggested that the shear stresses invoked by the unstimulated, healthy adult human colon may be lower than those in the USPII at 25 rpm and thus insufficient to achieve total release of a therapeutic compound from a hydroxyethyl cellulose matrix. When operated under stimulated conditions, drug release in the DCM was between that achieved at 25 and 50 rpm in the USPII.

In the original publication [...]

The performance of solid oral dosage forms targeting the colon is typically evaluated using standardised pharmacopeial dissolution apparatuses. However, these fail to replicate colonic hydrodynamics. This study develops a digital twin of the Dynamic Colon Model; a physiologically representative in vitro model of the human proximal colon. Magnetic resonance imaging of the Dynamic Colon Model verified that the digital twin robustly replicated flow patterns under different physiological conditions (media viscosity, volume, and peristaltic wave speed). During local contractile activity, antegrade flows of 0.06–0.78 cm s−1 and backflows of −2.16–−0.21 cm s−1 were measured. Mean wall shear rates were strongly time and viscosity dependent although peaks were measured between 3.05–10.12 s−1 and 5.11–20.34 s−1 in the Dynamic Colon Model and its digital twin respectively, comparable to previous estimates of the USPII with paddle speeds of 25 and 50 rpm. It is recommended that viscosity and shear rates are considered when designing future dissolution test methodologies for colon-targeted formulations. In the USPII, paddle speeds >50 rpm may not recreate physiologically relevant shear rates. These findings demonstrate how the combination of biorelevant in vitro and in silico models can provide new insights for dissolution testing beyond established pharmacopeial methods.

Knowledge of luminal flow inside the human colon remains elusive, despite its importance for the design of new colon-targeted drug delivery systems and physiologically relevant in silico models of dissolution mechanics within the colon. This study uses magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques to visualise, measure and differentiate between different motility patterns within an anatomically representative in vitro dissolution model of the human ascending colon: the dynamic colon model (DCM). The segmented architecture and peristalsis-like contractile activity of the DCM generated flow profiles that were distinct from compendial dissolution apparatuses. MRI enabled different motility patterns to be classified by the degree of mixing-related motion using a new tagging method. Different media viscosities could also be differentiated, which is important for an understanding of colonic pathophysiology, the conditions that a colon-targeted dosage form may be subjected to and the effectiveness of treatments. The tagged MRI data showed that the DCM effectively mimicked wall motion, luminal flow patterns and the velocities of the contents of the human ascending colon. Accurate reproduction of in vivo hydrodynamics is an essential capability for a biorelevant mechanical model of the colon to make it suitable for in vitro data generation for in vitro in vivo evaluation (IVIVE) or in vitro in vivo correlation (IVIVC). This work illustrates how the DCM provides new insight into how motion of the colonic walls may control luminal hydrodynamics, driving erosion of a dosage form and subsequent drug release, compared to traditional pharmacopeial methods.

This work used in vivo MRI images of human colon wall motion to inform a biorelevant Dynamic Colon Model (DCM) to understand the interplay of wall motion, volume, viscosity, fluid, and particle motion within the colon lumen. Hydrodynamics and particle motion within the DCM were characterized using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Positron Emission Particle Tracking (PEPT), respectively. In vitro PET images showed that fluid of higher viscosity follows the wall motion with poor mixing, whereas good mixing was observed for a low viscosity fluid. PEPT data showed particle displacements comparable to the in vivo data. Increasing fluid viscosity favors the net forward propulsion of the tracked particles. The use of a floating particle demonstrated shorter residence times and greater velocities on the liquid surface, suggesting a surface wave that was moving faster than the bulk liquid. The DCM can provide an understanding of flow motion and behavior of particles with different buoyancy, which in turn may improve the design of drug formulations, whereby fragments of the dosage form and/or drug particles are suspended in the proximal colon.