1. Multiplexity as a lens to investigate the cultural meanings of interpersonal ties
- Author
-
Neha Gondal
- Subjects
Sociology and Political Science ,Association rule learning ,General Social Sciences ,Flexibility (personality) ,Network structure ,General Social Survey ,Interpersonal ties ,Anthropology ,Premise ,Connotation (semiotics) ,Survey data collection ,Psychology ,Social psychology ,General Psychology - Abstract
A typical assumption in formal studies of social networks is that interpersonal ties classified under the same label carry the same cultural connotation. As cultural meanings matter for the construction of ties, this premise can be problematic when labels attributed to relationships sustain the simultaneous coexistence of disparate meanings. I argue that the measurement and analysis of multiplexity is a useful tool for testing the validity of this assumption and exploring the cultural meanings of ties using traditional survey data. Employing loglinear models and a datamining technique called ‘association rules’, I analyze data from the 2004 social networks component of the General Social Survey, which gave subjects the option to classify confidants into multiple relational categories. Contrary to standard assumptions, I find that, subjects report viewing their ties multiplexly a little less than half the time. Familial labels are either perceived as intrinsically meaningful or more broadly as ‘friends’ and ‘advisors.’ Spouses are likely to be described as ‘friends’ only when they are also classified as ‘coworkers’ or ‘group members.’ ‘Friend’ and ‘advisor’ also display complex layering alongside other labels indicative of flexibility. I discuss implications of my findings for network structure and the cultural meanings of close personal ties.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF