Search

Background: Richter transformation usually presents as an aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, occurs in up to 10% of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, has no approved therapies, and is associated with a poor prognosis. Pirtobrutinib has shown promising efficacy and tolerability in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies, including those who progress on covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors. This study aims to report the safety and activity of pirtobrutinib monotherapy in a subgroup of patients with Richter transformation from the multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 BRUIN study., Methods: This analysis included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed Richter transformation, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-2, and no limit of previous therapies, with patients receiving first-line treatment added in a protocol amendment (version 9.0, Dec 15, 2021). Pirtobrutinib 200 mg was administered orally once a day in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint of phase 1 of the BRUIN trial as a whole, which has been previously reported, was to establish the recommended phase 2 dose for pirtobrutinib monotherapy and the phase 2 primary endpoint was overall response rate. Safety and activity were measured in all patients who received at least one dose of pirtobrutinib monotherapy. This BRUIN phase 1/2 trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov and is closed to enrolment (NCT03740529)., Findings: Between Dec 26, 2019, and July 22, 2022, 82 patients were enrolled, of whom five were enrolled during phase 1 and 77 during phase 2. All but one patient received a starting dose of 200 mg pirtobrutinib once a day as the recommended phase 2 dose. The remaining patient received 150 mg pirtobrutinib once a day, which was not escalated to 200 mg. The median age of patients was 67 years (IQR 59-72). 55 (67%) of 82 patients were male and 27 (33%) were female. Most patients were White (65 [79%] of 82). 74 (90%) of 82 patients received at least one previous Richter transformation-directed therapy. Most patients (61 [74%] of 82) had received previous covalent BTK inhibitor therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or Richter transformation. The overall response rate was 50·0% (95% CI 38·7-61·3). 11 (13%) of 82 patients had a complete response and 30 (37%) of 82 patients had a partial response. Eight patients with ongoing response electively discontinued pirtobrutinib to undergo stem-cell transplantation. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse event was neutropenia (n=19). There were no treatment-related deaths., Interpretation: Pirtobrutinib shows promising safety and activity among patients with Richter transformation, most of whom received previous Richter transformation-directed therapy, including covalent BTK inhibitors. These data suggest that further investigation is warranted of pirtobrutinib as a treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory Richter transformation after treatment with a covalent BTK inhibitor., Funding: Loxo Oncology., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests WGW reports research funding from Numab Therapeutics, Loxo Oncology–Lilly, Janssens Biotech, NIH P30 CA016672/MDACC Cancer Center Support Grant, GlaxoSmithKline, AbbVie, Cyclacel, Nurix Therapeutics, Juno Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb (Juno & Celgene), AstraZeneca–Acerta Pharma Miragen, Oncternal Therapeutics, Janssens Biotech, Accutar Biotechnology, Sunesis, KITE Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Genentech, Pharmacyclics, GlaxoSmithKline–Novartis; consultancy fees from AbbVie, Cyclacel Nurix Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb (Juno & Celgene), AstraZeneca–Acerta Pharma; a non-relevant financial relationship with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network; support from the National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute under award number P30 CA016672; and use of MDACC Cancer Center Support Grant shared resources. NNS reports consultancy fees from Umoja, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb–Juno, LOXO Oncology–Lilly, TG therapeutic, Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Gilead–Kite, Incyte, AbbVie, Lilly Oncology, and Miltenyi Biotec; research funding from Miltenyi Biotec and Lilly Oncology; having stock options in a privately-held company with Tundra Therapeutics; and travel support from Epizyme and Miltenyi Biotec. CYC reports consultancy fees, honoraria, and having an advisory role for Roche, Janssen, Gilead, AstraZenecca, Eli Lilly, BeiGene, AbbVie, Menarini, Daizai, and Genmab, and research funding from Roche, MSD, Eli Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AbbVie. DL reports consultancy fees from Kite, BeiGene, Roche, Eli Lilly, and Janssen and membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees with Kite, BeiGene, Roche, Eli Lilly, and Janssen. MSH reports consultancy fees and honoraria from Pharmacyclics. CCC reports consultancy fees from LOXO Oncology–Eli Lilly, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, Genentech, AbbVie, Octapharma, Allogene, Janssen, TG Therapeutics, MEI Pharma, and Mingsight; honoraria from LOXO Oncology–Eli Lilly, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, Genentech, AbbVie; research funding paid to an institution from LOXO Oncology–Eli Lilly, AbbVie, and CarnaBio; membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees with BeiGene, AstraZeneca, Genentech, and AbbVie; being an equity holder in a publicly-traded company with Bluebird Bio, Geron, and Pfizer; and receiving travel support from LOXO Oncology–Eli Lilly. NL reports consultancy fees from Genentech, Pharmacyclics, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Janssen, and research funding from Genentech, TG Therapeutics, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, MingSight, LOXO Oncology–Eli Lilly, Oncternal, and Octapharma. SM reports consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Juno–Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Genentech, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, BeiGene; membership on a board of directors or advisory committee with AstraZeneca, Juno–Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Loxo Oncology, and BeiGene; research funding from AstraZeneca, Juno–Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly–Loxo Oncology, BeiGene; and speakers bureau with AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly–Loxo Oncology, and BeiGene. DJ reports research funding from Seagen, Trillium Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, MEI Pharma, Loxo Oncology, Debio Pharma, ATARA Biotherapeutics, AstraZeneca and membership on a board of directors or advisory committees with Affimed and Daiichi Sankyo. TM reports consultancy fees from BeiGene, Alexion, Sobi, Roche, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and AbbVie; honoraria from BeiGene, Alexion, Sobi, Roche, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and AbbVie; membership on a board of directors or advisory committees on BeiGene, Alexion, Sobi, Roche, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Abbvie; research Funding from Janssen, AbbVie; and speakers bureau for BeiGene, Alexion, Sobi, Roche, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and AbbVie. YW reports research funding from Incyte, InnoCare, LOXO Oncology, Eli Lilly, MorphoSys, Novartis, Genentech, Genmab, and AbbVie; membership on an advisory board with Eli Lilly, LOXO Oncology, TG Therapeutics, Incyte, InnoCare, Kite, Jansen, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, and Genmab; consultancy fees from Innocare and AbbVie; and honoraria from Kite. TAE reports membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees from Loxo Oncology, Incyte, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, KITE, AbbVie, Roche, Gilead, Secura Bio; speakers bureau from Loxo Oncology, Eli Lilly, Incyte, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, KITE, AbbVie, Loxo Oncology, Roche, Medscape, Janssen, Gilead, PeerView; research funding from BeiGene and AstraZeneca; consultancy fees from Eli Lilly, Incyte, Beigene, Autolus, AstraZeneca, KITE, AbbVie, Loxo Oncology, Roche, Janssen, and Gilead; and honoraria from Eli Lilly, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, KITE, AbbVie, Loxo Oncology, Roche, Janssen, and Gilead. JMR reports consultancy fees from Pharmacyclics, Jannsen, Genentech, GenMab, AstraZeneca, Morphosys, ADC Therapeutics, Epizyme, BeiGene, and AbbVie; research funding from Pharmacyclics, Velosbio, Loxo Oncology, Acerta, Oncternal Pharmaceuticals, Epizyme, and AbbVie; and honoraria from SeaGen. MM reports consultancy from Bayer, ADC therapeutics, Epizyme, Genentech, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Incyte; research funding from BeiGene, Janssen, F Hoffmann-La Roche– Genentech, Celgene–Bristol Myers Squibb, and Incyte; and speakers bureau with ADC therapeutics, BeiGene, and Kite–Gilead. CT reports honoraria from Loxo Oncolgy. WJ reports consultancy fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, SOBI, and Takeda and research funding from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Roche, SOBIm, and Takeda. KI reports honoraria from Eli Lilly, SymBio Pharmaceuticals, Meiji Seika, Nihon Kayaku, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Genmab, MSD, Pfizer, AbbVie, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, and Kyowa Kirin; consultancy fees from Takeda, AstraZeneca, Genmab, AbbVie, Otsuka, Eisai, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Nippon Shinyaku, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, and Zenyaku Kogyo; and research funding from AstraZeneca, Genmab, MSD, Pfizer, AbbVie, Otsuka, Eisai, Regeneron, Loxo Oncology, BeiGene, Daiichi Sankyo, Yakult, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Astellas Amgen, Chugai Pharma, Kyowa Kirin. AA reports membership on a board of directors or advisory committees with Genentech, Eli Lilly and Company, Amgen, TG Therapeutics, Incyte, BeiGene, Epizyme, Janssen, and SeaGen; research funding from Eli Lilly, Incyte, and BeiGene; and honoraria from Dr Reddy. MP reports consulting fees from Kura, Accutar, Mitsubishi; participating on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board with lema, Nurix, Daiichi, Kura, and Janssen; leadership with ION Pharma; honoraria from Janssen Oncology; and participating in a consulting or advisory role with Olema Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo–UCB Japan, Kura Oncology, Accutar Biotech, and Kura. JFS reports honoraria from Hoffmann-La Roche, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, and BeiGene; consultancy fees from Hoffmann-La Roche, TG Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb; participating on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board with Genor Bio, Hoffmann-La Roche, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, and BeiGene; speakers bureau with Hoffmann-La Roche, AbbVie, and BeiGene; and research funding from F Hoffmann-La Roche and AbbVie. JAW reports consultancy from Newave, Loxo Oncology, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Janssen, and Pharmacyclics and research funding from Schrodinger, Morphosys, Karyopharm, Janssen, and Pharmacyclics. PAT reports consultancy and honoraria from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Ascentage AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Genentech, Genmab, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Pharmacyclics; speakers bureau from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Merck; research funding from AbbVie, Pharmacyclics, Genentech, Lilly, and Adaptive Biotechnologies; and travel support from Merck. PA is a current employee of and equity holder in Eli Lilly. CH reports being an equity holder in Eli Lilly and Foundation Medicine and travel support from Eli Lilly. SCM reports current employment with, being an equity holder in, and travel support from Eli Lilly. NM reports being a current equity holder in Eli Lilly and current employment with Loxo Oncology. BN, CW, BCN, and DET reports current employment with and current equity holder in Eli Lilly. ASR reports current employment with and being equity holder in Eli Lilly and consultancy work with Telios Pharma. HL reports current employment with Loxo Oncology. LER reports serving as a consultant for AbbVie, Ascentage, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Pharmacyclics, Pfizer, and TG Therapeutics; membership of a data safety monitoring committee for Ascentage; serving as a CME speaker for DAVA, Curio, Medscape, and PeerView; holding minority ownership interest in Abbott Laboratories; having received travel support from LOXO Oncology; and having received research funding (paid to the institution) from Adaptive Biotechnologies, AstraZeneca, Genentech, AbbVie, Pfizer, Loxo Oncology, Aptose Biosciences, Dren Bio, and Qilu Puget Sound Biotherapeutics. PG reports consultancy, fees, honoraria, and research funding from Janssen, Eli Lilly–Loxo Oncology, MSD, Roche, AbbVie, BMS, BeiGene, and AstraZeneca., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) represents a distinct disease entity characterized by myeloid-related somatic mutations with a variant allele fraction of ≥2% in individuals with unexplained cytopenia(s) but without a myeloid neoplasm (MN). Notably, CCUS carries a risk of progressing to MN, particularly in cases featuring high-risk mutations. Understanding CCUS requires dedicated studies to elucidate its risk factors and natural history. Our analysis of 357 CCUS patients investigated the interplay between clonality, cytopenia, and prognosis. Multivariate analysis identified 3 key adverse prognostic factors: the presence of splicing mutation(s) (score = 2 points), platelet count <100×109/L (score = 2.5), and ≥2 mutations (score = 3). Variable scores were based on the coefficients from the Cox proportional hazards model. This led to the development of the Clonal Cytopenia Risk Score (CCRS), which stratified patients into low- (score <2.5 points), intermediate- (score 2.5-<5), and high-risk (score ≥5) groups. The CCRS effectively predicted 2-year cumulative incidence of MN for low- (6.4%), intermediate- (14.1%), and high- (37.2%) risk groups, respectively, by Gray's test (P <.0001). We further validated the CCRS by applying it to an independent CCUS cohort of 104 patients, demonstrating a c-index of 0.64 (P =.005) in stratifying the cumulative incidence of MN. Our study underscores the importance of integrating clinical and molecular data to assess the risk of CCUS progression, making the CCRS a valuable tool that is practical and easily calculable. These findings are clinically relevant, shaping the management strategies for CCUS and informing future clinical trial designs., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology.)

Pirtobrutinib is a highly selective, non-covalent (reversible) Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi). Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were treated with fixed-duration pirtobrutinib plus venetoclax (PV) or pirtobrutinib plus venetoclax and rituximab (PVR) in this phase 1b trial (NCT03740529). Prior covalent BTKi therapy was allowed, but not prior venetoclax. Patients were assigned to receive PV (n=15) or PVR (n=10) for 25 cycles. Median age was 66 years (range, 39-78). Median prior lines of therapy was 2 (range, 1-4), and 17 (68%) patients had received prior covalent BTKi. At the data-cutoff date (May 5, 2023), median time on study was 27.0 months for PV and 23.3 months for PVR. Overall response rates were 93.3% (95% CI:68.1-99.8%) for PV and 100% (95% CI:69.2-100.0%) for PVR, with 10 complete responses (PV:7; PVR:3). After 12 cycles of treatment, 85.7% (95% CI:57.2-98.2%) of PV and 90.0% (95% CI:55.5-99.7%) of PVR patients achieved undetectable minimal residual disease assessed in peripheral blood by clonoSEQ® assay at a sensitivity of <1x10-4. Progression-free survival at 18 months was 92.9% (95% CI: 59.1-99.0) for PV patients and 80.0% (95% CI: 40.9-94.6) for PVR patients. No DLTs were observed in either treatment combination during the 5-week assessment period. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events for all patients included neutropenia (52%) and anemia (16%). Adverse events led to dose reduction in 3 patients and discontinuation in 2. In conclusion, fixed-duration PV or PVR was well tolerated and had promising efficacy in patients with R/R CLL, including patients previously treated with a covalent BTKi., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology.)

Introduction: Pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, noncovalent (reversible) Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated promising efficacy in B-cell malignancies and is associated with low rates of discontinuation and dose reduction. Pirtobrutinib is administered until disease progression or toxicity, necessitating an understanding of the safety profile in patients with extended treatment., Methods: Here we report the safety of pirtobrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies with extended (≥12 months) drug exposure from the BRUIN trial. Assessments included median time-to-first-occurrence of adverse events (AEs), dose reductions, and discontinuations due to treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) and select AEs of interest (AESIs)., Results: Of 773 patients enrolled, 326 (42%) received treatment for ≥12 months. In the extended exposure cohort, the median time-on-treatment was 19 months. The most common all-cause TEAEs were fatigue (32%) and diarrhea (31%). TEAEs leading to dose reduction occurred in 23 (7%) and discontinuations in 11 (3%) extended exposure patients. One patient had a fatal treatment-related AE (COVID-19 pneumonia). Infections (73.0%) were the most common AESI with a median time-to-first-occurrence of 7.4 months. Majority of TEAEs and AESIs occurred during the first year of therapy., Conclusions: Pirtobrutinib therapy continues to demonstrate an excellent safety profile amenable to long-term administration without evidence of new or worsening toxicity signals., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose of Review: The therapeutic landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has undergone a complete makeover following the introduction of highly effective targeted therapies, beginning with ibrutinib which first attained regulatory approval for CLL in 2014., Recent Findings: In recent years, we have seen further refinement of therapeutic options with the development of newer-generation Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) including acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib that improve upon the safety of ibrutinib. Additionally, venetoclax-based approaches, combined with anti-CD20 antibodies, have allowed for time-limited targeted therapeutic strategies which are particularly attractive for certain subsets of patients though have demonstrated efficacy across all subgroups. Lastly, there is an ongoing movement toward the development of time-limited strategies inclusive of both a BTKi and venetoclax that may further widen potential options. CLL patients requiring frontline therapy have a unique burden of choice between highly effective therapies that differ substantially with respect to side effect profiles and schedules. This review will focus on the frontline management of CLL in the setting of these rapidly changing options., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: The therapeutic landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) has significantly evolved over the past decade with dramatically improved outcomes with the introduction of targeted therapies. This unfortunately has not been the case for Richter transformation (RT), the histologic transformation to a more aggressive lymphoma, most typically diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). As such, RT continues to be one of the most challenging complications of CLL/SLL. Historically, RT has a poor response to treatment, with a minority reaching complete remission (CR) and overall survival (OS) being less than a year., Areas Covered: The focus of this review is to discuss the effectiveness of commonly used regimens, and review existing data for emerging regimens being examined in ongoing clinical trials to improve prognosis and outcomes in patients with RT. Despite extensive efforts to optimize therapies for RT, there is still no generalized consensus on either first-line treatment regimens or regimens in the relapsed/refractory setting. RT continues to carry a high mortality rate without durable response to current therapeutic agents., Expert Opinion: Ongoing and future research may identify novel treatment approaches that will eventually improve outcomes for patients with RT. The optimal care for RT patients is a clinical trial, when feasible.

A large-scale genomic analysis of patients with ASXL1 -mutated myeloid disease has not been performed to date. We reviewed comprehensive genomic profiling results from 6043 adults to characterize clinicopathologic features and co-mutation patterns by ASXL1 mutation status. ASXL1 mutations occurred in 1414 patients (23%). Mutation co-occurrence testing revealed strong co-occurrence ( p  < 0.01) between mutations in ASXL1 and nine genes ( SRSF2, U2AF1, RUNX1, SETBP1, EZH2, STAG2, CUX1, CSF3R, CBL ). Further analysis of patients with these co-mutations yielded several novel findings. Co-mutation patterns supported that ASXL1/SF3B1 co-mutation may be biologically distinct from ASXL1 /non- SF3B1 spliceosome co-mutation. In AML, ASXL1/SRSF2 co-mutated patients frequently harbored STAG2 mutations (42%), which were dependent on the presence of both ASXL1 and SRSF2 mutation ( p  < 0.05). STAG2 and SETBP1 mutations were also exclusive in ASXL1/SRSF2 co-mutated patients and associated with divergent chronic myeloid phenotypes. Our findings support that certain multi-mutant genotypes may be biologically relevant in ASXL1 -mutated myeloid disease.

Over the last decade, targeted inhibition of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) has led to a paradigm shift in the way chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is managed. BTK inhibitors (BTKi) are broadly classified as covalent BTKI and noncovalent BTKi (cBTKi and ncBTK) Ibrutinib, as the first approved cBTKi, vastly improved outcomes for patients with CLL over prior chemoimmunotherapy regimens. However, long-term use is limited by both intolerance and resistance. The second generation of more selective BTKi were developed to improve tolerability. While these agents have led to an improved safety profile in comparison to Ibrutinib (both acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib), and improved efficacy (zanubrutinib), intolerance occasionally occurs, and resistance remains a challenge. The third generation of BTKi, which noncovalently or reversibly inhibits BTK, has shown promising results in early phase trials and are being evaluated in the phase 3 setting. These drugs could be an effective treatment option in patients with either resistance and intolerance to cBTKi. The most recent development in therapeutic agents targeting BTK is the development of BTK degraders. By removing BTK, as opposed to inhibiting it, these drugs could remain efficacious irrespective of BTK resistance mutations, however clinical data are limited at this time. This review summarizes the evolution and ongoing development of newer BTKi and BTK degraders in the management of CLL, with a focus of future directions in this field, including how emerging clinical data could inform therapeutic sequencing in CLL management., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) have poor outcomes after the failure of covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor treatment, and new therapeutic options are needed. Pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, noncovalent (reversible) BTK inhibitor, was designed to reestablish BTK inhibition., Methods: We conducted a phase 1-2 trial in which patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell cancers received pirtobrutinib. Here, we report efficacy results among patients with CLL or SLL who had previously received a BTK inhibitor as well as safety results among all the patients with CLL or SLL. The primary end point was an overall response (partial response or better) as assessed by independent review. Secondary end points included progression-free survival and safety., Results: A total of 317 patients with CLL or SLL received pirtobrutinib, including 247 who had previously received a BTK inhibitor. Among these 247 patients, the median number of previous lines of therapy was 3 (range, 1 to 11), and 100 patients (40.5%) had also received a B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor such as venetoclax. The percentage of patients with an overall response to pirtobrutinib was 73.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.3 to 78.7), and the percentage was 82.2% (95% CI, 76.8 to 86.7) when partial response with lymphocytosis was included. The median progression-free survival was 19.6 months (95% CI, 16.9 to 22.1). Among all 317 patients with CLL or SLL who received pirtobrutinib, the most common adverse events were infections (in 71.0%), bleeding (in 42.6%), and neutropenia (in 32.5%). At a median duration of treatment of 16.5 months (range, 0.2 to 39.9), some adverse events that are typically associated with BTK inhibitors occurred relatively infrequently, including hypertension (in 14.2% of patients), atrial fibrillation or flutter (in 3.8%), and major hemorrhage (in 2.2%). Only 9 of 317 patients (2.8%) discontinued pirtobrutinib owing to a treatment-related adverse event., Conclusions: In this trial, pirtobrutinib showed efficacy in patients with heavily pretreated CLL or SLL who had received a covalent BTK inhibitor. The most common adverse events were infections, bleeding, and neutropenia. (Funded by Loxo Oncology; BRUIN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03740529.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Introduction: This study assessed treatment discontinuation patterns and reasons among chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients initiating first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) treatments in real-world settings., Materials and Methods: Using deidentified electronic medical records from the CLL Collaborative Study of Real-World Evidence, premature treatment discontinuation was assessed among FCR, BR, BTKi-based, and BCL-2-based regimen cohorts., Results: Of 1364 1L patients (initiated in 1997-2021), 190/13.9% received FCR (23.7% discontinued prematurely); 255/18.7% received BR (34.5% discontinued prematurely); 473/34.7% received BTKi-based regimens, of whom 28.1% discontinued prematurely; and 43/3.2% received venetoclax-based regimens, of whom 16.3% discontinued prematurely (venetoclax monotherapy: 7/0.5%, of whom 42.9% discontinued; VG/VR: 36/2.6%, of whom 11.1% discontinued). The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were adverse events (FCR: 25/13.2%; BR: 36/14.1%; BTKi-based regimens: 75/15.9%) and disease progression (venetoclax-based: 3/7.0%). Of 626 2L patients, 20/3.2% received FCR (50.0% discontinued); 62/9.9% received BR (35.5% discontinued); 303/48.4% received BTKi-based regimens, of whom 38.0% discontinued; and 73/11.7% received venetoclax-based regimens, of whom 30.1% discontinued (venetoclax monotherapy: 27/4.3%, of whom 29.6% discontinued; VG/VR: 43/6.9%, of whom 27.9% discontinued). The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were adverse events (FCR: 6/30.0%; BR: 11/17.7%; BTKi-based regimens: 60/19.8%; venetoclax-based: 6/8.2%)., Conclusion: The findings of this study highlight the continued need for tolerable therapies in CLL, with finite therapy offering a better tolerated option for patients who are newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory to prior treatments., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) refers to the expansion of hematopoietic stem cell clones and their cellular progeny due to somatic mutations, mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs), or copy number variants which naturally accumulate with age. CH has been linked to increased risk of blood cancers, but CH has also been linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes., Recent Findings: A combination of clinical outcome studies and mouse models have offered strong evidence that CH mutations either correlate with or cause atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, aortic aneurysm, myocardial infarction, stroke, aortic stenosis, poor outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or orthotopic heart transplant, death or need of renal replacement therapy secondary to cardiogenic shock, death from cardiovascular causes at large, and enhance anthracycline cardiac toxicity. Mechanistically, some adverse outcomes are caused by macrophage secretion of IL-1β and IL-6, neutrophil invasion of injured myocardium, and T-cell skewing towards inflammatory phenotypes. CH mutations lead to harmful inflammation and arterial wall invasion by bone marrow-derived cells resulting in poor cardiovascular health and outcomes. Blockade of IL-1β or JAK2 signaling are potential avenues for preventing CH-caused cardiovascular morbidity and mortality., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Cellular therapies can be viewed as both the newest and oldest techniques for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and Richter's transformation (RT). On one hand, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) has been available for decades, though its use is diminishing with the increasing availability of effective novel targeted agents, especially in CLL. Among newer techniques, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) have demonstrated astounding efficacy in several hematologic malignancies, leading to FDA approval and use in clinical practice. However, though CLL is the earliest disease type for which CAR-T were studied, development has been slower and has yet to lead to regulatory approval. Owing partially to its rarity but also due to the aggressive behavior of RT, CAR-T in RT have only been minimally explored. Here, we will focus on the applications of cellular therapies in CLL and RT, specifically reviewing more recent data related to alloHSCT in the novel-agent era and CAR-T cell development in CLL/RT, focusing on safety and efficacy successes and limitations. We will review strategies to improve upon CAR-T efficacy and discuss ongoing trials utilizing CAR-T in CLL/RT, as well as emerging technologies, such as allogeneic CAR-T and natural killer CAR (CAR NK) cells.

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) refers to the disproportionate expansion of hematopoietic stem cell clones and their corresponding progeny following the acquisition of somatic mutations. CH is common at the time of diagnosis in patients with blood cancers, including multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma. The presence of CH mutations correlates with IL-6 mediated inflammation and may result in lymphoma or MM modulation through microenvironment effects or by manifestations of the mutations themselves within the founding tumor clone. As might be expected with a variety of mutations and multiple potential mechanisms, CH exerts context-dependent effects, being protective in some settings and harmful in others. Though CH is very common in patients with hematologic malignancies, how it intersects with therapy and the natural disease course of these cancers are active areas of investigation. In lymphomas and MM specifically, patients have high rates of CH at diagnosis and are subsequently exposed to therapies, such as cytotoxic chemotherapy, that can cause CH progression to overt hematologic malignancy. The expanding diversity of treatment modalities for these cancers also increases the opportunities for CH to impact clinical outcome and modulate clinical responses. Here we review the basic biology and known health effects of CH, and we focus on the clinical relevance of CH in lymphoma and MM., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Ibrutinib is an oral Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Clinical trial data suggest that strict adherence is directly related to clinical outcomes. This retrospective, multicenter study aimed to evaluate ibrutinib adherence and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with CLL/SLL treated in the real-world setting. The primary outcome was to quantify ibrutinib adherence rates in the real-world setting using the proportion of days covered (PDC) calculation. Secondary outcomes included the association of ibrutinib adherence with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). For the 100 patients in the primary analysis, the mean PDC was 95% (range: 65-100%). Patients who maintained PDC > 95% for each of the first 6 months experienced fewer PFS events ( n  = 1) compared to those with PDC ≤ 95% ( n  = 5; p =.03). The correlation between adherence and OS was not assessed due to a low number of events.

Venetoclax is a BCL-2 inhibitor approved for treatment of adult patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Due to significant risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) upon treatment initiation, a 5-week dose ramp-up is recommended. University of North Carolina Medical Center (UNCMC) utilizes a novel interdisciplinary model of care involving clinical pharmacists (CPs) who oversee the 5-week ramp-up to minimize treatment-related adverse events. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a pharmacist-led venetoclax initiation protocol on patient outcomes. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of venetoclax-induced TLS during dose ramp-up in patients managed by a CP. In this cohort ( n  = 39), there were no cases of TLS during the venetoclax ramp-up. Reduced TLS rates were observed in CP-managed real-world patients compared to previous real-world reports. This real-world analysis supports the utilization of CPs for intensive monitoring of patients initiated on venetoclax.

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a critical downstream signaling element from the B-cell receptor (BCR) that has been effectively inhibited in B-cell cancers by irreversible, covalent inhibitors including ibrutinib and acalabrutinib. All FDA-approved covalent BTK inhibitors rely on binding to the cysteine 481 (C481) amino acid within the active site of BTK, thus rendering it inert. While covalent BTK inhibitors have been very successful in multiple B-cell malignancies, improving both overall survival and progression-free survival relative to chemoimmunotherapy in phase 3 trials, they can be limited by intolerance and disease progression. Pirtobrutinib is a novel, highly selective, and non-covalent BTK inhibitor that binds independently of C481, and in a recent, first-in-human phase 1/2 clinical trial was shown to be extremely well tolerated and lead to remissions in relapsed/refractory patients with multiple B-cell malignancies. Here, we review the pharmacologic rationale for pursuing non-covalent BTK inhibitors, the clinical need for such inhibitors, existing safety, and resistance mechanism data for pirtobrutinib, and the forthcoming clinical trials that seek to define the clinical utility of pirtobrutinib, which has the potential to fulfill multiple areas of unmet clinical need for patients with B-cell malignancies., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: J.L.J. is an AbbVie shareholder. A.R.M. receives research support from TG Therapeutics, Pharmacyclics, Abbvie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Johnson and Johnson, Acerta / AstraZeneca, DTRM BioPharma, Sunesis, BeiGene, Genentech, Genmab, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Nurix, and does advisory/consultancy/DSMB work with TG Therapeutics, Pharmacyclics, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Abbvie, Johnson and Johnson, Acerta / AstraZeneca, DTRM BioPharma, Sunesis, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Genentech, Janssen, Loxo Oncology. L.E.R. has served as a consultant for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Pharmacyclics, Pfizer, TG Therapeutics, and Vaniam group, holds minority ownership interest in Abbott Laboratories, and has received research funding (paid to the institution) from Pfizer, Loxo Oncology, and Aptose Biosciences. C.C.C. has served as a consultant for AbbVie, has served on steering committees for AbbVie and Loxo Oncology, has served on independent review committees for AbbVie and Octapharma, has received honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Genentech, LOXO Oncology, MEI Pharma, Novartis, TG Therapeutics, and has received research funding (paid to the institution) from H3 Biomedicine, Incyte, Loxo Oncology., (© The Author(s), 2022.)

Background: Covalent (irreversible) Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have transformed the treatment of multiple B-cell cancers, especially chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, resistance can arise through multiple mechanisms, including acquired mutations in BTK at residue C481, the binding site of covalent BTK inhibitors. Noncovalent (reversible) BTK inhibitors overcome this mechanism and other sources of resistance, but the mechanisms of resistance to these therapies are currently not well understood., Methods: We performed genomic analyses of pretreatment specimens as well as specimens obtained at the time of disease progression from patients with CLL who had been treated with the noncovalent BTK inhibitor pirtobrutinib. Structural modeling, BTK-binding assays, and cell-based assays were conducted to study mutations that confer resistance to noncovalent BTK inhibitors., Results: Among 55 treated patients, we identified 9 patients with relapsed or refractory CLL and acquired mechanisms of genetic resistance to pirtobrutinib. We found mutations (V416L, A428D, M437R, T474I, and L528W) that were clustered in the kinase domain of BTK and that conferred resistance to both noncovalent BTK inhibitors and certain covalent BTK inhibitors. Mutations in BTK or phospholipase C gamma 2 (PLCγ2), a signaling molecule and downstream substrate of BTK, were found in all 9 patients. Transcriptional activation reflecting B-cell-receptor signaling persisted despite continued therapy with noncovalent BTK inhibitors., Conclusions: Resistance to noncovalent BTK inhibitors arose through on-target BTK mutations and downstream PLCγ2 mutations that allowed escape from BTK inhibition. A proportion of these mutations also conferred resistance across clinically approved covalent BTK inhibitors. These data suggested new mechanisms of genomic escape from established covalent and novel noncovalent BTK inhibitors. (Funded by the American Society of Hematology and others.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

The management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has undergone unprecedented changes over the last decade. Modern targeted therapies are incorporated into clinical practice. Unfortunately, patients have begun to develop resistance or intolerance to multiple classes. Symptomatic patients previously treated with a BTK inhibitor (BTKi) and venetoclax represent a new and rapidly growing unmet need in CLL. Here, we define unmet needs in a modern treatment context. We also critically review the literature for PI3K inhibitors and chemoimmunotherapy and lack of data to support their utility following BTKis and venetoclax. Finally, we suggest opportunities to ensure the continued innovation for patients with CLL., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: The 2021 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy (CHPCA) Meeting, "Prostate Cancer Research in the 21st Century," was held virtually, from June 24-25, 2021., Methods: The CHPCA Meeting is organized by the Prostate Cancer Foundation as a unique discussion-oriented meeting focusing on critical topics in prostate cancer research envisioned to bridge the next major advances in prostate cancer biology and treatment. The 2021 CHPCA Meeting was virtually attended by 89 investigators and included 31 talks over nine sessions., Results: Major topic areas discussed at the meeting included: cancer genomics and sequencing, functional genomic approaches to studying mediators of plasticity, emerging signaling pathways in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer, Wnt signaling biology and the challenges of targeted therapy, clonal hematopoiesis, neuroendocrine cell plasticity and antitumor immunity, cancer immunotherapy and its synergizers, and imaging the tumor microenvironment and metabolism., Discussion: This meeting report summarizes the research presented at the 2021 CHPCA Meeting. We hope that publication of this knowledge will accelerate new understandings and the development of new biomarkers and treatments for prostate cancer., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Programmed death 1 (PD-1) is an integral component of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) immune evasion, chemotherapy resistance, and disease progression. PD-1 inhibitors are being investigated as treatment for AML in combination with hypomethylating agents and cytotoxic chemotherapy with encouraging findings. Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) remains the most established curative treatment for patients with relapsed and refractory AML in complete remission, there are limited data on the clinical outcomes and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) prior to alloSCT in AML. In the present study, we compared clinical outcomes of 9 patients with AML receiving high-dose cytarabine followed by pembrolizumab in a phase II clinical trial (NCT02768792) prior to alloSCT versus a historical control group of 18 AML patients who underwent alloSCT without prior ICI exposure. The nonparametric Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used to test for a difference in the ordered severity categories of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) within 100 days of transplantation. Time-to-event estimates for overall survival and relapse-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a log-rank test. One-year survival was not significantly different between the treatment groups (67% versus 78%; P = .34). 100-day mortality was 0% in the ICI group versus 17% in the control group, and there was no increase in grade III-IV acute GVHD in patients treated with pembrolizumab prior to alloSCT. No chronic GVHD was seen in patients treated with pembrolizumab prior to alloSCT and who received post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as part of their conditioning regimen. These findings reinforce the safety and feasibility of ICI therapy prior to alloSCT in patients with AML, and suggest that PTCy may abrogate GVHD risk and severity in patients who receive ICI prior to undergoing alloSCT for AML., (Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We conducted a phase I clinical trial of H3B-8800, an oral small molecule that binds Splicing Factor 3B1 (SF3B1), in patients with MDS, CMML, or AML. Among 84 enrolled patients (42 MDS, 4 CMML and 38 AML), 62 were red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent at study entry. Dose escalation cohorts examined two once-daily dosing regimens: schedule I (5 days on/9 days off, range of doses studied 1-40 mg, n = 65) and schedule II (21 days on/7 days off, 7-20 mg, n = 19); 27 patients received treatment for ≥180 days. The most common treatment-related, treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and vomiting. No complete or partial responses meeting IWG criteria were observed; however, RBC transfusion free intervals >56 days were observed in nine patients who were transfusion dependent at study entry (15%). Of 15 MDS patients with missense SF3B1 mutations, five experienced RBC transfusion independence (TI). Elevated pre-treatment expression of aberrant transcripts of Transmembrane Protein 14C (TMEM14C), an SF3B1 splicing target encoding a mitochondrial porphyrin transporter, was observed in MDS patients experiencing RBC TI. In summary, H3B-8800 treatment was associated with mostly low-grade TAEs and induced RBC TI in a biomarker-defined subset of MDS., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Immune suppression, exhaustion, and senescence are frequently seen throughout disease progression in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We conducted a phase II study of high-dose cytarabine followed by pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. on day 14 to examine whether PD-1 inhibition improves clinical responses in relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML. Overall responders could receive pembrolizumab maintenance up to 2 years. Among 37 patients enrolled, the overall response rate, composite complete remission (CRc) rate (primary endpoint), and median overall survival (OS) were 46%, 38%, and 11.1 months, respectively. Patients with refractory/early relapse and those receiving treatment as first salvage had encouraging outcomes (median OS, 13.2 and 11.3 months, respectively). Grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events were rare (14%) and self-limiting. Patients who achieved CRc had a higher frequency of progenitor exhausted CD8 + T cells expressing TCF-1 in the bone marrow prior to treatment. A multifaceted correlative approach of genomic, transcriptomic, and immunophenotypic profiling offers insights on molecular correlates of response and resistance to pembrolizumab., Significance: Immune-checkpoint blockade with pembrolizumab was tolerable and feasible after high-dose cytarabine in R/R AML, with encouraging clinical activity, particularly in refractory AML and those receiving treatment as first salvage regimen. Further study of pembrolizumab and other immune-checkpoint blockade strategies after cytotoxic chemotherapy is warranted in AML. See related commentary by Wei et al., p. 551 . This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 549 ., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

The ASXL1 and SRSF2 mutations in AML are frequently found in patients with preexisting myeloid malignancies and are individually associated with poor outcomes. In this multi-institutional retrospective analysis, we assessed the genetic features and clinical outcomes of 43 patients with ASXL1 mut SRSF2 mut AML and compared outcomes to patients with either ASXL1 (n = 57) or SRSF2 (n = 70) mutations. Twenty-six (60%) had secondary-AML (s-AML). Variant allele fractions suggested that SRSF2 mutations preceded ASXL1 mutational events. Median overall survival (OS) was 7.0 months (95% CI:3.8,15.3) and was significantly longer in patients with de novo vs s-AML (15.3 vs 6.4 months, respectively; P = .04 on adjusted analysis). Compared to ASXL1 mut SRSF2 wt and ASXL1 wt SRSF2 mut , co-mutated patients had a 1.4 and 1.6 times increase in the probability of death, respectively (P = .049), with a trend towards inferior OS (median OS = 7.0 vs 11.5 vs 10.9 months, respectively; P = .10). Multivariable analysis suggests this difference in OS is attributable to the high proportion of s-AML patients in the co-mutated cohort (60% vs 32% and 23%, respectively). Although this study is limited by the retrospective data collection and the relatively small sample size, these data suggest that ASXL1 mut SRSF2 mut AML is a distinct subgroup of AML frequently associated with s-AML and differs from ASXL1 mut SRSF2 wt /ASXL1 wt SRSF2 mut with respect to etiology and leukemogenesis., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are efficacious in multiple B-cell malignancies, but patients discontinue these agents due to resistance and intolerance. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of pirtobrutinib (working name; formerly known as LOXO-305), a highly selective, reversible BTK inhibitor, in these patients., Methods: Patients with previously treated B-cell malignancies were enrolled in a first-in-human, multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial of the BTK inhibitor pirtobrutinib. The primary endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose (phase 1) and overall response rate (ORR; phase 2). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03740529., Findings: 323 patients were treated with pirtobrutinib across seven dose levels (25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, and 300 mg once per day) with linear dose-proportional exposures. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The recommended phase 2 dose was 200 mg daily. Adverse events in at least 10% of 323 patients were fatigue (65 [20%]), diarrhoea (55 [17%]), and contusion (42 [13%]). The most common adverse event of grade 3 or higher was neutropenia (32 [10%]). There was no correlation between pirtobrutinib exposure and the frequency of grade 3 treatment-related adverse events. Grade 3 atrial fibrillation or flutter was not observed, and grade 3 haemorrhage was observed in one patient in the setting of mechanical trauma. Five (1%) patients discontinued treatment due to a treatment-related adverse event. In 121 efficacy evaluable patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) treated with a previous covalent BTK inhibitor (median previous lines of treatment 4), the ORR with pirtobrutinib was 62% (95% CI 53-71). The ORR was similar in CLL patients with previous covalent BTK inhibitor resistance (53 [67%] of 79), covalent BTK inhibitor intolerance (22 [52%] of 42), BTK C481-mutant (17 [71%] of 24) and BTK wild-type (43 [66%] of 65) disease. In 52 efficacy evaluable patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) previously treated with covalent BTK inhibitors, the ORR was 52% (95% CI 38-66). Of 117 patients with CLL, SLL, or MCL who responded, all but eight remain progression-free to date., Interpretation: Pirtobrutinib was safe and active in multiple B-cell malignancies, including patients previously treated with covalent BTK inhibitors. Pirtobrutinib might address a growing unmet need for alternative therapies for these patients., Funding: Loxo Oncology., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a B-cell neoplasm with clonal expansion of small lymphocytes. Ibrutinib, an irreversible inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK), is a first-line treatment option, and recent data suggest that strict adherence is directly related to clinical outcomes., Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to quantify ibrutinib adherence rates in real-world patients with CLL on ibrutinib; secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and overall survival., Methods: This retrospective study included subjects who were treated at a large academic medical center over approximately 5 years. Subjects were at least 18 years, diagnosed with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma, and treated with ibrutinib monotherapy for at least 6 months. Adherence was quantified using the medication possession ratio (MPR), which is the ratio of the sum of days' supply of medication in a period over the number of days in that period, and was based on fill history from the medical center's specialty pharmacy., Results: For the 32 subjects in this study, the mean ibrutinib adherence rate was 91.7% (range, 84.4%-100%). Only 3 subjects had disease progression, and 1 death was recorded while on therapy (all with MPR < 95%); therefore, analyses of clinical outcomes were unable to be assessed due to a low number of events. There were no statistically significant differences in rates of adherence based on baseline characteristics and adverse drug events., Conclusion: In patients with CLL treated with ibrutinib, mean adherence was 91.7%, which is lower than rates seen in clinical trials., Competing Interests: Dr. Coombs has received honoraria from AbbVie, Loxo, Pharmacyclics, Octapharma, and H3 Biomedicine, has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Covance, and Cowen & Co., and has received institutional funding from Incyte, Gilead, AROG, Loxo, and H3 Biomedicine. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (© 2021 Harborside™.)

Acquired mutations are pervasive across normal tissues. However, understanding of the processes that drive transformation of certain clones to cancer is limited. Here we study this phenomenon in the context of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) and the development of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (tMNs). We find that mutations are selected differentially based on exposures. Mutations in ASXL1 are enriched in current or former smokers, whereas cancer therapy with radiation, platinum and topoisomerase II inhibitors preferentially selects for mutations in DNA damage response genes (TP53, PPM1D, CHEK2). Sequential sampling provides definitive evidence that DNA damage response clones outcompete other clones when exposed to certain therapies. Among cases in which CH was previously detected, the CH mutation was present at tMN diagnosis. We identify the molecular characteristics of CH that increase risk of tMN. The increasing implementation of clinical sequencing at diagnosis provides an opportunity to identify patients at risk of tMN for prevention strategies.

Although novel agents (NAs) have improved outcomes for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a subset will progress through all available NAs. Understanding outcomes for potentially curative modalities including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) following NA therapy is critical while devising treatment sequences aimed at long-term disease control. In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, we examined 65 patients with CLL who underwent alloHCT following exposure to ≥1 NA, including baseline disease and transplant characteristics, treatment preceding alloHCT, transplant outcomes, treatment following alloHCT, and survival outcomes. Univariable and multivariable analyses evaluated associations between pre-alloHCT factors and progression-free survival (PFS). Twenty-four-month PFS, overall survival (OS), nonrelapse mortality, and relapse incidence were 63%, 81%, 13%, and 27% among patients transplanted for CLL. Day +100 cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) was 24%; moderate-severe GVHD developed in 27%. Poor-risk disease characteristics, prior NA exposure, complete vs partial remission, and transplant characteristics were not independently associated with PFS. Hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index independently predicts PFS. PFS and OS were not impacted by having received NAs vs both NAs and chemoimmunotherapy, 1 vs ≥2 NAs, or ibrutinib vs venetoclax as the line of therapy immediately pre-alloHCT. AlloHCT remains a viable long-term disease control strategy that overcomes adverse CLL characteristics. Prior NAs do not appear to impact the safety of alloHCT, and survival outcomes are similar regardless of number of NAs received, prior chemoimmunotherapy exposure, or NA immediately preceding alloHCT. Decisions about proceeding to alloHCT should consider comorbidities and anticipated response to remaining therapeutic options., (© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Purpose: Venetoclax-based therapy is a standard-of-care option in first-line and relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Patient management following venetoclax discontinuation remains nonstandard and poorly understood., Experimental Design: To address this, we conducted a large international study to identify a cohort of 326 patients who discontinued venetoclax and have been subsequently treated. Coprimary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival for the post-venetoclax treatments stratified by treatment type [Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), PI3K inhibitor (PI3Ki), and cellular therapies]., Results: We identified patients with CLL who discontinued venetoclax in the first-line (4%) and relapsed/refractory settings (96%). Patients received a median of three therapies prior to venetoclax; 40% were BTKi naïve ( n = 130), and 81% were idelalisib naïve ( n = 263). ORR to BTKi was 84% ( n = 44) in BTKi-naïve patients versus 54% ( n = 30) in BTKi-exposed patients. We demonstrate therapy selection following venetoclax requires prior novel agent exposure consideration and discontinuation reasons., Conclusions: For BTKi-naïve patients, selection of covalently binding BTKis results in high ORR and durable remissions. For BTKi-exposed patients, covalent BTK inhibition is not effective in the setting of BTKi resistance. PI3Kis following venetoclax do not appear to result in durable remissions. We conclude that BTKi in naïve or previously responsive patients and cellular therapies following venetoclax may be the most effective strategies. See related commentary by Rogers, p. 3501 ., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

An immunosuppressive microenvironment promoting leukemia cell immune escape plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AML. Through its interaction with cereblon, a substrate receptor for the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, pomalidomide leads to selective ubiquitination of transcription factors Aiolos and Ikaros thereby promoting immune modulation. In this phase I trial, 51 newly diagnosed non-favorable risk AML and high-risk MDS patients were enrolled and treated with AcDVP16 (cytarabine 667 mg/m 2 /day IV continuous infusion days 1-3, daunorubicin 45 mg/m 2 IV days 1-3, etoposide 400 mg/m 2 IV days 8-10) induction therapy followed by dose- and duration-escalation pomalidomide beginning at early lymphocyte recovery. Forty-three patients (AML: n = 39, MDS: n = 4) received pomalidomide. The maximum tolerated dose of pomalidomide was 4 mg for 21 consecutive days. The overall complete remission (CR + CRi) rate, median overall survival, and disease-free survival were 75%, 27.1 and 20.6 months, respectively. Subset analyses revealed 86% CR/CRi rate in AML patients with unfavorable-risk karyotype treated with pomalidomide. Pomalidomide significantly decreased Aiolos expression in both CD4 + and CD8 + peripheral blood and bone marrow T cells, promoted T cell differentiation, proliferation, and heightened their cytokine production. Finally, pomalidomide induced distinct gene expression changes in immune function-related ontologies in CD4 + and CD8 + T cells.

Liquid biopsies are new technologies that allow cancer profiling of tumor fragments found in body fluids, such as peripheral blood, collected noninvasively from patients with malignancies. These assays are increasingly valuable in clinical oncology practice as prognostic biomarkers, as guides for therapy selection, for treatment monitoring, and for early detection of disease progression and relapse. However, application of these assays to rare cancers, such as pediatric and adult sarcomas, have lagged. In this article, we review the technical challenges of applying liquid biopsy technologies to sarcomas, provide an update on progress in the field, describe common pitfalls in interpreting liquid biopsy data, and discuss the intersection of sarcoma clinical care and commercial assays emerging on the horizon.

Purpose: Bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) proteins are key epigenetic transcriptional regulators, inhibition of which may suppress oncogene expression. We report results from 2 independent first-in-human phase 1/2 dose-escalation and expansion, safety and tolerability studies of BET inhibitors INCB054329 (study INCB 54329-101; NCT02431260) and INCB057643 (study INCB 57643-101; NCT02711137)., Patients and Methods: Patients (≥18 years) with advanced malignancies, ≥1 prior therapy, and adequate organ functions received oral INCB054329 (monotherapy) or INCB057643 (monotherapy or in combination with standard-of-care) in 21-day cycles (or 28-day cycles depending on standard-of-care combination). Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability., Results: Sixty-nine and 134 patients received INCB054329 and INCB057643, respectively. Study INCB 54329-101 has been completed; INCB 57643-101 is currently active, but not recruiting (no patients were receiving treatment as of January 8, 2019). Terminal elimination half-life was shorter for INCB054329 versus INCB057643 (mean [SD], 2.24 [2.03] vs. 11.1 [8.27] hours). INCB054329 demonstrated higher interpatient variability in oral clearance versus INCB057643 (CV%, 142% vs. 45.5%). Most common (>20%) any-grade treatment-related adverse events were similar for both drugs (INCB054329; INCB057643): nausea (35%; 30%), thrombocytopenia (33%; 32%), fatigue (29%; 30%), decreased appetite (26%; 22%). Two confirmed complete responses and 4 confirmed partial responses with INCB057643 were reported as best responses., Conclusions: INCB057643 exhibited a more favorable PK profile versus INCB054329; exposure-dependent thrombocytopenia was observed with both drugs which limited the target inhibition that could be safely maintained. Further efforts are required to identify patient populations that can benefit most, and an optimal dosing scheme to maximize therapeutic index., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Elderly chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) patients treated outside of trials have notably greater toxicity with the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib compared to younger patients. It is not known whether the same holds true for the B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor venetoclax. We provide a comprehensive analysis of key safety measures and efficacy in 342 patients comparing age categories ≥75 and <75 years treated in the relapsed, refractory non-trial setting. We demonstrate that venetoclax has equivalent efficacy and safety in relapsed/refractory CLL patients who are elderly, the majority of whom are previous ibrutinib-exposed and therefore may otherwise have few clear therapeutic options., (© 2019 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To review the current state of molecular and genetic profiling of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and its implications., Data Source: Peer-reviewed journal articles., Conclusion: Significant advances in the understanding of the pathology of acute myeloid leukemia have led to refined risk stratification of patients and application of novel targeted therapies based on genetic profiles. Minimal residual disease testing allows for highly sensitive disease surveillance that can be used to predict relapse and assess treatment response., Implications for Nursing Practice: Accurate prognostication and therapeutic decision-making for patients with acute myeloid leukemia is dependent on molecular profiling. Being knowledgeable of the implications of minimal residual disease testing is critical for patient-centered care., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immunophenotyping is critical to the diagnosis of MS, as it can be difficult to differentiate from other diagnoses including lymphoma using conventional light microscopy., Competing Interests: CCC has received honoraria from Abbvie, H3 Biomedicine, and Pharmacyclics, has served as a consultant for Abbvie, has received institutional funding from Gilead, H3 Biomedicine, and Incyte, and has received travel funding from AROG and Incyte, JFZ has received honoraria from Celgene, Tolero, and Agios, has served as a consultant for Celgene and AsystBio Laboratories, and has received research funding from Merck, Takeda, and Tolero, and NDM received free sequencing from ArcherDx, and received prior research and travel funding from Ventana Biosystems, a subsidiary of Roche., (© 2019 The Authors. Clinical Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Clinical trials of venetoclax reported negligible rates of clinical tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) when using an extended dose escalation schedule. We aimed to understand TLS prophylaxis, rates of select adverse events (AE), and impact of dosing modifications in routine clinical practice., Experimental Design: This retrospective cohort study included 297 CLL venetoclax-treated patients outside of clinical trials in academic and community centers. Demographics, baseline disease characteristics, venetoclax dosing, TLS risk and prophylaxis, and AEs were collected., Results: The group was 69% male, 96% had relapsed/refractory CLL, 45% had deletion chromosome 17p, 84% had unmutated IGHV , 80% received venetoclax monotherapy, and median age was 67. TLS risk was categorized as low (40%), intermediate (32%), or high (28%), and 62% had imaging prior to venetoclax initiation. Clinical TLS occurred in 2.7% of patients and laboratory TLS occurred in 5.7%. Pre-venetoclax TLS risk group and creatinine clearance independently predict TLS development in multivariable analysis. Grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia (39.6%), thrombocytopenia (29.2%), infection (25%), neutropenic fever (7.9%), and diarrhea (6.9%). Twenty-two patients (7.4%) discontinued venetoclax due to an AE. Progression-free survival was similar regardless of number of dose interruptions, length of dose interruption, and stable venetoclax dose., Conclusions: These data provide insights into current use of venetoclax in clinical practice, including TLS rates observed in clinical practice. We identified opportunities for improved adherence to TLS risk stratification and prophylaxis, which may improve safety., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Venetoclax (VEN) is approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) as monotherapy (VENmono) or in combination with rituximab. Whether VEN plus anti-CD20 (VENcombo) is superior to VENmono is unknown. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis comparing 321 CLL patients treated with VENmono vs VENcombo across the United States and the United Kingdom. We examined demographics, baseline characteristics, dosing, adverse events, response rates, and outcomes. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), estimated by Kaplan-Meier method, in patients treated with VENmono vs VENcombo. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed with COX regression. Three hundred twenty-one CLL patients were included (3 median prior treatments, 78% prior ibrutinib). The overall response rates (ORRs) were similar (VENmono, 81% ORR, 34% complete remission [CR] vs VENcombo, 84% ORR, 32% CR). With a median follow-up of 13.4 months, no differences in PFS and OS were observed between the groups. In unadjusted analyses, the hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS for VENmono vs VENcombo were HR 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-1.8; P = .7) and HR 1.2 (95% CI, 0.6-2.3; P = .5), respectively. When adjusting for differences between the cohorts, the addition of an anti-CD20 antibody in combination with VEN did not impact PFS (HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.5-2.0; P = .9) or OS (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.4-2.6; P = .8). We demonstrate comparable efficacy between VENmono and VENcombo in a heavily pretreated, high-risk, retrospective cohort, in terms of both response data and survival outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings., (© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Purpose: In this era of precision-based medicine, for optimal patient care, results reported from commercial next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays should adequately reflect the burden of somatic mutations in the tumor being sequenced. Here, we sought to determine the prevalence of clonal hematopoiesis leading to possible misattribution of tumor mutation calls on unpaired Foundation Medicine NGS assays., Experimental Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals undergoing NGS of solid tumors from two large cancer centers. We identified and quantified mutations in genes known to be frequently altered in clonal hematopoiesis ( DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, TP53, ATM, CHEK2, SF3B1, CBL, JAK2 ) that were returned to physicians on clinical Foundation Medicine reports. For a subset of patients, we explored the frequency of true clonal hematopoiesis by comparing mutations on Foundation Medicine reports with matched blood sequencing., Results: Mutations in genes that are frequently altered in clonal hematopoiesis were identified in 65% (1,139/1,757) of patients undergoing NGS. When excluding TP53 , which is often mutated in solid tumors, these events were still seen in 35% (619/1,757) of patients. Utilizing paired blood specimens, we were able to confirm that 8% (18/226) of mutations reported in these genes were true clonal hematopoiesis events. The majority of DNMT3A mutations (64%, 7/11) and minority of TP53 mutations (4%, 2/50) were clonal hematopoiesis., Conclusions: Clonal hematopoiesis mutations are commonly reported on unpaired NGS testing. It is important to recognize clonal hematopoiesis as a possible cause of misattribution of mutation origin when applying NGS findings to a patient's care. See related commentary by Pollyea, p. 5790 ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Importance: Although clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is well described in aging healthy populations, few studies have addressed the practical clinical implications of these alterations in solid-tumor sequencing., Objective: To identify and quantify CH-related mutations in patients with solid tumors using matched tumor-blood sequencing, and to establish the proportion that would be misattributed to the tumor based on tumor-only sequencing (unmatched analysis)., Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective analysis of samples from 17 469 patients with solid cancers who underwent prospective clinical sequencing of DNA isolated from tumor tissue and matched peripheral blood using the MSK-IMPACT assay between January 2014 and August 2017., Main Outcomes and Measures: We identified the presence of CH-related mutations in each patient's blood leukocytes and quantified the fraction of DNA molecules harboring the mutation in the corresponding matched tumor sample., Results: The mean age of the 17 469 patients with cancer at sample collection was 59.2 years (range, 0.3-98.9 years); 53.6% were female. We identified 7608 CH-associated mutations in the blood of 4628 (26.5%) patients. A total of 1075 (14.1%) CH-associated mutations were also detectable in the matched tumor above established thresholds for calling somatic mutations. Overall, 912 (5.2%) patients would have had at least 1 CH-associated mutation erroneously called as tumor derived in the absence of matched blood sequencing. A total of 1061 (98.7%) of these mutations were absent from population scale databases of germline polymorphisms and therefore would have been challenging to filter informatically. Annotating variants with OncoKB classified 534 (49.7%) as oncogenic or likely oncogenic., Conclusions and Relevance: This study demonstrates how CH-derived mutations could lead to erroneous reporting and treatment recommendations when tumor-only sequencing is used.