Search

Background: Advanced age has been widely identified as a risk factor for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), but most related studies were performed before the introduction of novel therapies. The aim of this study was to compare CDI characteristics and outcomes in patients over and under 80 years old with CDI and their outcomes in the era of new treatments., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with CDI from January 2021 to December 2022 in an academic hospital. We compared recurrence and mortality at 12 weeks after the end of treatment. An extension of the Fine and Grey model adjusted for competing events was used to assess the effect of age on recurrence., Results: Four hundred seventy-six patients were considered to have CDI (320 in patients <80 years and 156 in ≥80 years). CDI in older patients was more frequently healthcare-associated and was more severe. Although the Charlson index was almost identical between populations, comorbidities clearly differed. New treatments (bezlotoxumab, fidaxomicin and faecal microbiota transplantation) were more frequently used in older patients without statistical significance (41.3% vs. 33.4%, P = .053). There were 69 (14.5%) recurrences, with no differences by age group after adjusting for competing events. Mortality was greater in the oldest (35.3%) than in the youngest (13.1%); P < .001., Conclusions: No differences in CDI recurrence rates were found between age groups. However, there was a high mortality rate in patients ≥80 years old, which emphasises the urgent need to improve the prevention and treatment of CDI in this group., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) occurs in various contexts and care settings and is managed by multiple specialists who are not experts in its management. While there are many initiatives to improve the diagnosis and avoid overdiagnosis, there is less focus on the overall management of the infection., Methods: We studied a cohort of patients with a positive test result for toxigenic C difficile in 2 hospitals. Hospital A has a program that provides advice from an infectious disease specialist (IDS) and promotes continuity of care by providing a phone number to contact the IDS. Hospital B does not have any specific CDI program. The evaluation assessed the proportion of patients not treated (carriers or self-limited disease), adherence to Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines, access to novel therapies, recurrence and mortality rates, and readmission and emergency department visits due to CDI. We assessed the program's effectiveness through a logistic regression model adjusted for covariates chosen by clinical criteria., Results: Hospital A avoided more unnecessary treatments (19.3% vs 11.5%), provided access to novel therapies more frequently (35.3% vs 13%), and adhered more closely to current guidelines (95.8% vs 71.3%). Although the mortality and recurrence rates did not differ, the absence of an intervention program was associated with greater odds of admission due to recurrence (odds ratio, 4.19; P = .037) and more visits to the emergency department due to CDI (odds ratio, 8.74; P = .001)., Conclusions: Implementation of a CDI intervention program based on recommendations from IDSs and improved access to specialized care during the follow-up is associated with enhanced quality of CDI management and potential reductions in hospital resource utilization., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. J. C. Consulting fees from Mikrombiomik and MSD, educational honoraria fron and Tillots, support for attending conference from Microbiomik, MSD and Tillots. R. E. -S support for attending conference from MSD. Others authors: No reported conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: In non-endemic countries, malaria can be transmitted through blood donations from imported cases. To ensure standards of quality and safety of human blood, the European Union and Spanish national law, requires a deferral period, or a screening by immunological or genomic test among those donors with potential risk of malaria. Scientific societies, European Committee on Blood Transfusion, and Spanish Society of Haematology and Haemotherapy, refer only to the result of the immunological test., Methods: An observational retrospective study was performed in potential donors with a positive immunological test for malaria done in the Regional Transfusion Center in Madrid and referred to the National Reference Unit for Tropical Diseases in Madrid between 2015-2020. At consultation a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for malaria was performed., Results: During the study period, 121 possible donors attended for consultation at NRU-Trop. Median age: 38.5 (IQR:33-48); median time to consultation was 32 months (IQR:12.5-110). Eighty-two (67.8%) donors were migrants and thirty-nine were travellers (32.2%). ELISA values were available for 109 subjects (90.1%), 56 individual left malaria endemic area > 3 years before. All donors tested negative for Plasmodium spp PCR test (n = 121, 100%)., Conclusions: None of the subjects with a positive immunologic test deferred as blood donors had a positive genomic test. The presence of Plasmodium spp in collected blood was not detected by molecular techniques. To avoid the loss of potential blood donors, especially those with low incidence red blood cell antigens, as more precise microbiology techniques become available, updating the existing legislation becomes necessary to increase the availability of donated blood., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Vast majority of helminth diseases remain neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), causing significant morbidity. The widespread and periodic distribution of antiparasitic drugs, remains the cornerstone for controlling these diseases. In Spain, most helminthiasis cases are imported, and suspicion and diagnosis have become increasingly important. Our primary objective is to present the epidemiological landscape of helminthiasis diagnoses within our facility, while also detailing the demographic characteristics of the affected population., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at the Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa (HUSO) from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2020, encompassing all diagnosed cases of helminthiasis during this period. Comprehensive epidemiological, clinical, and microbiological data were gathered for all diagnosed patients. The study population comprised patients receiving treatment at the HUSO, as well as those receiving treatment at the Leganés and Fuenlabrada Primary Care Units. Subsequently, descriptive and comparative statistics were performed, comparing Spanish and foreign patients., Results: During this period, a total of 952 patients were diagnosed with some form of helminthiasis. Among them, 495 were Spanish, and 457 were foreign. The total number of helminths identified, including patients with multiple infections, was 1,010. Significant differences were observed between Africans and Americans in terms of age distribution, with a higher prevalence among Africans in the 0-15 age range and among Americans in the 31-60 age range. Variations were noted in the distribution of helminths, with S. stercoralis significantly affecting Americans. For Spanish patients, the presence of Trichuris trichiura and S. stercoralis was significantly associated with eosinophilia, whereas among foreign patients, it was associated with Trichuris trichiura, Ascaris lumbricoides among others. Regarding symptoms, skin manifestations were more frequent among Spanish, while digestive were more common among foreigners., Conclusions: This study offers crucial epidemiological insights into helminth infections observed over time in a Madrid hospital. Although the prevalence of helminth infections has been decreasing, there is still a need for screening and diagnosing foreign patients., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Up to 40% of cases of imported malaria in Europe are diagnosed in recently arrived migrants, who generally exhibit asymptomatic or mild symptoms and show low parasitaemia (submicroscopic). The study describes the prevalence of malaria infection among asymptomatic Sub-Saharan African migrants (ASSAM) and compares asymptomatic malaria-infected (AMI) vs non-malaria infected patients., Methods: An observational, comparative, retrospective study was carried out in ASSAM who underwent a medical examination, between 2010 and 2019 at the National Reference Unit for Tropical Diseases (NRU-Trop) in Madrid, Spain. Medical examination and systematic screening protocol for infectious diseases, including screening for malaria infection by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was performed., Results: During the study period, 632 out of 1061 ASSAM were screened for malaria, median age: 24 years (IQR:1-5); median time from arrival to diagnosis: 2 months (IQR:1-5). P. falciparum was the most frequent species: 61 patients (67.8%). Compared to non-malaria infected, AMI subjects had: higher rate of co-infection with S. stercoralis (41.1%VS 22.9%;p < 0.001) and filariae (8.9% VS 2.4%;p = 0.006), lower erythrocyte corpuscular volume (83.6 VS 84.4;p = 0.008) and lower levels of cholesterol (151.0 VS 167.3;p < 0.001)., Conclusions: We observed a high prevalence of AMI among ASSAM. This highlights the need to consider routing screening of migrants from endemic areas and to study if such screening could avoid the potential morbidities associated with chronic infection, reduce morbi-mortality of acute malaria and the risk of transmission in host communities., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: One of the most controversial issues in recent years has been the clinical significance of high vancomycin MIC in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical implication that this parameter has in the staphylococcal bacteremia of a second level hospital., Methods: Retrospective descriptive study between January 2014 and September 2016 with 138 records from the blood culture Severo Ochoa University Hospital registry. A total of 98 cases were finally analized. Microbiological analysis of vancomycin MIC was performed using micro dilution technique., Results: The mean age was 71.4 ± 12.45 and 63.26% of the patients had a Charlson index ≥6. A 30.61% were carriers of a venous central catheter. The most frequent source was venous central catheter (26.53%). There were 14.24% metastatic events. Global mortality rate at 30 days was 25.51%. The 43.87% of strains had a vancomycin MIC ≥ 2 mg/L. High vancomycin MIC was significantly associated with persistent bacteremia (OR 3.12 [1.13-8.93]), maintaining this statistical significance in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) group (p =0.001) but no in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) group (p = 0.13). Persistent bacteremia was also significantly related with permanent catheter carriers (OR 4.18 [1.38-12.61]), peripheric catheter source (OR 5.18 [1.13-8.93]) and metastatic complications (OR 3.82 [1.03- 12.81]). There was no significant association between high vancomycin MIC and mortality., Conclusions: High vancomycin MIC may be useful in daily clinical practice as a marker of poor clearance of S. aureus bacteremia, specially when is due to MRSA strains., (©The Author 2018. Published by Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).)