1. EQRAIN: uranium and plutonium interlaboratory exercises from 1997 to 2016—comparison to ITVs-2010
- Author
-
Corinne Rigaux, Danièle Roudil, Christophe Maillard, Marielle Crozet, Caroline Bertorello, and Sébastien Picart
- Subjects
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis ,Nuclear engineering ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,chemistry.chemical_element ,Nuclear material ,Uranium ,010403 inorganic & nuclear chemistry ,01 natural sciences ,Pollution ,0104 chemical sciences ,Analytical Chemistry ,Plutonium ,Nuclear Energy and Engineering ,chemistry ,Nuclear industry ,Consistency (statistics) ,Environmental science ,Measurement uncertainty ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Statistical analysis ,Spectroscopy ,Transuranium element - Abstract
Since 1987, the CEA’s Committee for the establishment of analysis methods (CETAMA) has regularly implemented interlaboratory comparisons, entitled “evaluation of the quality results of analysis in the nuclear industry” (EQRAIN). Notably, the EQRAIN U and EQRAIN Pu interlaboratory comparisons assess proficiency in measuring a mass content of uranium or plutonium in reference solutions. This paper presents the results of measurement uncertainty assessments from EQRAIN U and EQRAIN Pu comparisons over 20 years of exercises (1997–2016). The mathematical approach developed in this work allowed to estimate the impact of short-term systematic and random errors to the overall uncertainty of each analytical method used in the interlaboratory comparison program. This statistical analysis shows a good consistency between measurement uncertainty values from EQRAINs and the measurement uncertainty target values established by the International Atomic Energy Agency for nuclear material balances (ITVs-2010).
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF