Search

Introduction: Ewing sarcoma is an aggressive malignancy primarily affecting children and adolescents. Limited research is available on treatment practices, clinical course, and survival in adults., Methods: A multi-institution retrospective cohort study of all adults (>18 years) and children (≤18 years) with Ewing sarcoma treated in British Columbia, Canada between January 01, 2000 and December 31, 2018., Results: One-hundred seven individuals (66 adults, 41 children) were included in the analysis. 5-year OS was 58 % in adults and 75 % in children. For individuals with local disease, 5-year OS was 74 % in adults and 84 % in children. Adult status was associated with impaired PFS (HR, 1.8; 95 % CI, 1.0 - 3.1, p=0.04) and OS (HR, 1.8; 95 % CI, 0.9 - 3.5; p=0.088). A Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥3 was associated with impaired survival in adults and children (HR, 3.9, 95 % CI, 2.0 - 7.5; p=<0.001); baseline CCIs were not significantly different between groups. Most adults (61/66; 92 %) and all children (41/41; 100 %) received systemic treatment with no significant difference in mean lines of therapy, treatment modalities or agents. Most children received interval-compressed chemotherapy (35/41; 85 %) compared to adults (19/61; 29 %; p=<0.001). Interval-compression was not significantly associated with improved survival in adults with local disease (HR, 0.51; 95 % CI 0.1 - 2.3; p=0.373). Children more often initiated treatment within 28 days of diagnosis (31/33; 94 %) compared to adults (41/64; 64 %, p=0.001). Treatment within 28 days was associated with improved survival in the entire cohort (HR, 2.04 95 % CI, 1.1 - 3.9; p = 0.03). This association was preserved in subanalysis of individuals with local disease (HR, 5.4; 95 % CI, 1.9 - 15; p = 0.001) and only adults (HR, 5.3, 95 % CI, 1.7 - 17; p = 0.005)., Discussion: Survival for adults with Ewing sarcoma is inferior to children despite similarities in presentation, tumour characteristics and treatments. Further studies on the value of interval-compression in adults are required. Timely initation of treatment should be a priority for this disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the study authors have a conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Importance: Liquid biopsy has emerged as a complement to tumor tissue profiling for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The optimal way to integrate liquid biopsy into the diagnostic algorithm for patients with newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC remains unclear., Objective: To evaluate the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genotyping before tissue diagnosis among patients with suspected advanced NSCLC and its association with time to treatment., Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-group nonrandomized clinical trial was conducted among 150 patients at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre-University Health Network (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) between July 1, 2021, and November 30, 2022. Patients referred for investigation and diagnosis of lung cancer were eligible if they had radiologic evidence of advanced lung cancer prior to a tissue diagnosis., Interventions: Patients underwent plasma ctDNA testing with a next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay before lung cancer diagnosis. Diagnostic biopsy and tissue NGS were performed per standard of care., Main Outcome and Measures: The primary end point was time from referral to treatment initiation among patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC using ctDNA testing before diagnosis (ACCELERATE [Accelerating Lung Cancer Diagnosis Through Liquid Biopsy] cohort). This cohort was compared with a reference cohort using standard tissue genotyping after tissue diagnosis., Results: Of the 150 patients (median age at diagnosis, 68 years [range, 33-91 years]; 80 men [53%]) enrolled, 90 (60%) had advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. The median time to treatment was 39 days (IQR, 27-52 days) for the ACCELERATE cohort vs 62 days (IQR, 44-82 days) for the reference cohort (P < .001). Among the ACCELERATE cohort, the median turnaround time from sample collection to genotyping results was 7 days (IQR, 6-9 days) for plasma and 23 days (IQR, 18-28 days) for tissue NGS (P < .001). Of the 90 patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, 21 (23%) started targeted therapy before tissue NGS results were available, and 11 (12%) had actionable alterations identified only through plasma testing., Conclusions and Relevance: This nonrandomized clinical trial found that the use of plasma ctDNA genotyping before tissue diagnosis among patients with suspected advanced NSCLC was associated with accelerated time to treatment compared with a reference cohort undergoing standard tissue testing., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04863924.

Introduction: Molecular profiling of tumor tissue is the gold standard for treatment decision-making in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results may be delayed or unavailable due to insufficient tissue, prolonged wait times for biopsy, pathology assessment and testing. We piloted the use of plasma testing in the initial diagnostic workup for patients with suspected advanced lung cancer., Methods: Patients with ⩽15 pack-year smoking history and suspected advanced lung cancer referred to the lung cancer rapid diagnostic program underwent plasma circulating-tumor DNA testing using a DNA-based mutation panel. Tissue testing was performed per standard of care, including comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS). The primary endpoint was time from diagnostic program referral to cancer treatment in stage IV NSCLC patients (Cohort A) compared to a contemporary cohort not enrolled in the study (Cohort B) and an historical pre-COVID cohort referred to the program between 2018 and 2019 (Cohort C)., Results: From January to June 2021, 20 patients were enrolled in Cohort A; median age was 70.5 years (range 33-87), 70% were female, 55% Caucasian, 85% never smokers, and 75% were diagnosed with NSCLC. Seven had actionable alterations detected in plasma or tissue (4/7 concordant). Fusions, not tested in plasma, were identified by immunohistochemistry for three patients. Mean result turnaround time was 17.8 days for plasma NGS and 23.6 days for tissue ( p  = 0.10). Mean time from referral to treatment initiation was significantly shorter in cohort A at 32.6 days (SD 13.1) versus 62.2 days (SD 31.2) in cohort B and 61.5 days (SD 29.1) in cohort C, both p  < 0.0001., Conclusion: Liquid biopsy in the initial diagnostic workup of patients with suspected advanced NSCLC can lead to faster molecular results and shorten time to treatment even with smaller DNA panels. An expansion study using comprehensive NGS plasma testing with faster turnaround time is ongoing (NCT04862924)., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s), 2022.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, yielding marked improvements in survival and the potential for durable clinical responses. Primary and acquired resistance to current immune checkpoint inhibitors constitute a key challenge despite the remarkable responses observed in a subset of patients. Multiple novel combination immunotherapy and adoptive cell therapy strategies are presently being developed to address treatment resistance. The success of these strategies hinges upon rational clinical trial design as well as careful consideration of the immunologic mechanisms within the variable tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) which underpin resistance to immunotherapy. Further research is needed to facilitate a deeper understanding of these complex mechanisms within the TIME, which may ultimately provide the key to restoring and enhancing an effective anti-tumor immune response. This review aims to provide an introduction to some of the recent and notable combination immunotherapy and cell therapy strategies used in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the rationale for their use based on current understanding of the anti-tumor immune response and mechanisms of resistance within the TIME.