1. Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomographic Coronary Artery Calcium Evaluation With a 64-Slice Scanner Versus a 256-Slice Scanner.
- Author
-
Madaj, Paul, Li, Dong, Nakanishi, Rine, Andreini, Daniele, Pontone, Gianluca, Conte, Edoardo, O'Rourke, Rachael, Hamilton-Craig, Christian, Nimmagadda, Manojna, Kim, Nicholas, Fatima, Badiha, Dailing, Christopher, Shaikh, Kashif, Shekar, Chandana, Lee, Ju Hwan, and Budoff, Matthew J
- Subjects
Prevention ,Heart Disease ,Biomedical Imaging ,Cardiovascular ,Calcium ,Coronary Angiography ,Coronary Artery Disease ,Coronary Vessels ,Early Detection of Cancer ,Female ,Humans ,Lung Neoplasms ,Male ,Radiation Dosage ,Coronary angiography/methods ,coronaryartery disease/diagnostic imaging ,multi-detector computed tomography/instrumentation ,predictive value of tests ,prospective studies ,radiation dosage ,radiation exposure/prevention & control ,risk factors ,vascular calcification/diagnostic imaging ,coronary artery disease/diagnostic imaging ,multidetector computed tomography/instrumentation ,Cardiovascular System & Hematology - Abstract
Computed tomographic coronary artery calcium scanning enables cardiovascular risk stratification; however, exposing patients to high radiation levels is an ongoing concern. New-generation computed tomographic systems use lower radiation doses than older systems do. To quantify comparative doses of radiation exposure, we prospectively acquired images from 220 patients with use of a 64-slice GE LightSpeed VCT scanner (control group, n=110) and a 256-slice GE Revolution scanner (study group, n=110). The groups were matched for age, sex, and body mass index; statistical analysis included t tests and linear regression. The mean dose-length product was 21% lower in the study group than in the control group (60.2 ± 27 vs 75.9 ± 22.6 mGy·cm; P
- Published
- 2022