Search

We herein report a 48-year-old man with a history of chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) and repeated hemoptysis after radiofrequency ablation. Contrast tomography showed soft tissue thickening of the left hilar region and left pulmonary vein stenosis. We performed bronchial artery embolization, but the hemoptysis did not disappear, and AF was not controlled. We performed left lung lobectomy and maze procedures since we considered surgical removal necessary as radical treatment. After the surgery, hemoptysis and atrial fibrillation did not recur. Refractory hemoptysis after catheter ablation is rare, but occasionally occurs in patients with severe pulmonary vein stenosis.

Objective: Cox Maze procedure is an effective surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation and it is often performed concomitantly with mitral valve surgery. However, some patients still experience atrial tachyarrhythmia post-surgery, which adversely affects heart function as well as their quality of life. Method: We present the case of a 66-year-old female patient who underwent mitral valve replacement with a bio-prosthesis and Cox-Maze procedure; she was later admitted to our center after 14 months due to pneumonia and atrial tachycardia. An electrophysiology study/ intervention was performed. Result: We successfully determined the mechanism and ablated the atrial tachyarrhythmia. The sinus rhythm was restored and was maintained 3 months post-procedure, with amelioration of the left ventricular function. Conclusion: Electrophysiology study with electro-anatomy mapping can help to determine the mechanism of arrhythmia to guide successful ablation of post-operative arrhythmia

Atrial tachycardia (AT) and atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly occur after cardiac surgeries (CSs). This study investigated the mechanisms and long-term outcomes of AT and AF ablation after various Maze procedures, particularly whether atrial tachyarrhythmias after the Maze procedure occur due to gaps in the Maze lines. We analyzed 37 consecutive cases with atrial tachyarrhythmias after the Maze procedures and concomitant CSs between 2007 and 2019. Fifty-nine atrial tachyarrhythmias were induced in 37 consecutive cases, and 49 of those atrial tachyarrhythmias were mappable ATs. Forty ATs were related to the Maze procedures in the 49 mappable ATs (81.6%). All 37 consecutive cases had residual electrical conductions (gaps) in the Maze lines (88 gaps; 2.4 ± 1.2 gaps/patient). Forty of 88 gaps (45.5%) were associated with gap-related ATs. The common ATs in this study were 1. peri-mitral atrial flutter due to gaps at pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) line to mitral valve annulus (MVA) (20 cases), and 2. peri-tricuspid atrial flutter due to gaps at right atrial incision to the tricuspid valve annulus (TVA) (10 cases). Forty-seven of 49 ATs (95.9%) were successfully ablated at the first session, and there were no complications. The mean follow-up period after ablation was 3.6 ± 3.2 (median, 2.1; interquartile range, 0.89-6.84) years. The Kaplan-Meier analysis of freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after Maze procedure was 82.7% at 1-year follow-up and 75.5% at 4-year follow-up after a single procedure. Reentry was the main mechanism of ATs after Maze procedures and concomitant CSs, and ATs were largely related to the gaps on the Maze lines between the PVI line and the MVA or those on the lines between right atrial incision to the TVA. Long-term follow-up data suggest that catheter ablation of atrial tachyarrhythmias after various Maze procedures is effective and safe.

Cardiac adipose tissue is a well-known risk factor for the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after radiofrequency catheter ablation, but its correlation with maze surgery remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the recurrence of AF and the adipose component of the left atrium (LA) in patients who underwent a modified Cox maze (CM) III procedure. We reviewed the pathology data of resected LA tissues from 115 patients, including the adipose tissue from CM-III procedures. The mean follow-up duration was 30.05 ± 23.96 months. The mean adipose tissue component in the AF recurrence group was 16.17% ± 14.32%, while in the non-recurrence group, it was 9.48% ± 10.79% (p = 0.021), and the cut-off value for the adipose component for AF recurrence was 10% (p = 0.010). The rates of freedom from AF recurrence at 1, 3, and 5 years were 84.8%, 68.8%, and 38.6%, respectively, in the high-adipose group (≥10%), and 96.3%, 89.7%, and 80.3%, respectively, in the low-adipose group (

Background Recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia after surgical ablation is known as a negative predictor of cardiovascular events and total mortality. However, there have been no focused studies for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence prediction in patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and the risk-benefit estimation of surgical ablation in tricuspid valve (TV) surgery is not fully established. Objectives In this study, we analyzed predictors of AF recurrence, safety, and efficacy of the modified Cox maze (CM) procedure in patients with AF undergoing TV operation.Method We screened 421 patients who underwent a TV operation between 1994 and 2017. After excluding patients who did not undergo a maze operation, 158 patients were enrolled. Enrolled patients were divided by recurrence of AF.We analyzed the difference between the AF recurrence group and no AF recurrence group, and AF recurrence factors in terms of clinical risk factors and echocardiographic risk factors. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were presented using a Cox proportional hazard model.ResultS Among 158 patients, AF recurred in 65 patients within 10 years. For AF prediction, age was most the important clinical factor and right atrium (RA) diameter was the most important echocardiographic parameters. In patients with a larger RA diameter over 49.2mm, the prevalence of AF recurrence was higher (HR 4.322, 95% CI [2.185-8.549], log rank p value < 0.001). In clinical outcome, there was no significant difference between the AF recurrence group and the no recurrence group in terms of death, TR recurrence, heart failure and stroke. However, the risk of permanent pacemaker (PPM) insertion was higher in the AF recurrence group (HR 4.706, 95% CI [0.975-22.708], log rank p value 0.034) compared to the no recurrence group. Conclusion Age and RA enlargement are key predictors of AF recurrence after TV operation with the CM procedure in patients with significant TR.

Aims.To assess the outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment by radiofrequency ablation for patients with mitral valve replacement, the analysis of short-term results of 128 patients was performed.Methods.Mean age of the patients was 56,7±9,6 (29 - 79) years, males - 39, females - 89. Most of the patients had longstanding persistent AF - 81 (63,3%), 28 (21,9%) had persistent AF and 19 (14,8%) - paroxysmal AF. The indications for surgery were: rheumatic mitral valve disease in 105 patients (82%), degerative mitral valve disease - in 21 (16,4%) and with treated infectious endocarditis - in 2 (1,6%). Maze IV procedure was carried out in all cases.Results.Hospital mortality was 0,8% (1 patient). Ten patients (7,9%) required pacemaker implantation. The indications were sinus node dysfunction in 7 patients, bradycardia AF - in 2 patients, AV node dysfunction - in 1. At the discharge 88 patients (69,3%) had a sinus rhythm, 10 (7,9%) - atrial rhythm, pacemaker rhythm with sinus node dysfunction patients - in 4 (3,1%) and AF - in 25 (19,7%). Thus, the rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation was 80,3% (102 patients). The effectiveness of ablation for paroxysmal AF was 100%, persistent - 74,1%, longstanding persistent - 77,8% (p=0,006). To reveal other predictors of freedom from AF at the discharge each ECHO parameter was included in the simple logistic regression analysis. Statistically significant p-value was obtained for the preoperative right atrial size (p=0,005), and close to it for the left atrial size, especially for the index left atrial volume/body surface area (p=0,052).Conclusion.Thus, the radiofrequency ablation is an effective method for treatment of AF in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement. The rate of freedom from AF at the discharge is 80,3%. The predictors of freedom from AF at the discharge are preoperative form of AF and preoperative size of atria.

espanolIntroduccion: La cirugia mediante mini-toracotomia lateral presenta ventajas comparativas sobre el acceso convencional comomenor trauma quirurgico, reducida morbimortalidad y un resultado estetico superior, pero plantea dificultades en caso denecesitar estimulacion electrica temporal.Objetivo: Valorar el empleo terapeutico del cateter de Swan-Ganz con marcapasos incorporado como solucion a dicho problemay analizar sus complicaciones.Material y metodos: Se incluyeron pacientes programados para cirugia mini-invasiva mitral mediante mini-toracotomia lateral.Se definio empleo terapeutico del cateter al uso debido a bradiarritmias o trastornos de conduccion o necesidad de incrementarla frecuencia cardiaca con fines hemodinamicos. Pacientes intervenidos de urgencia o emergencia, fueron excluidos del estudio.Resultados: Fueron incluidos 517 pacientes (289 de sexo masculino, con edad promedio de 68,3 ± 10,4 anos); se efectuaron 115(22,2%) reemplazos y 402 (77,7%) plasticas mitrales. Simultaneamente, se realizaron 294 (56,9%) procedimientos de Maze, 182(35,2%) cierres de orejuela izquierda, 9 (1,7%) cierres de defectos septales y 14 (2,7%) plasticas tricuspideas. Ciento sesenta ydos (313%) pacientes necesitaron ser marcapaseados; debido a bradiarritmias, 85 (52,47%) pacientes; por trastornos de conduccion,50 (30,86%) pacientes; mientras que otros 27 (16,66%) requirieron incrementar su frecuencia debido a bajo volumenminuto. La mortalidad resulto de 12 (2,32%) casos. Catorce (2,7%) pacientes presentaron perdida de captura y se resolvieroncon el reposicionamiento del cateter, mientras que 2 (0,6%) pacientes presentaron atrapamiento y requirieron reintervencion.Conclusiones: Casi un tercio de los pacientes intervenidos mediante mini-toracotomia lateral requirieron del empleo terapeuticodel cateter de Swan-Ganz con marcapasos. Dos pacientes presentaron atrapamiento y requirieron resolucion quirurgica. EnglishThe use of a lateral mini-thoracotomy presents several advantages over the standard access, such as less surgical trauma, reduced morbidity and mortality, shorter recovery time and better cosmetic results, but presents difficulties iftemporary pacing is required.Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic use of a Swan-Ganz catheter with pacing capabilities andanalyze its complications.Methods: Patients undergoing scheduled minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through lateral mini-thoracotomy wereincluded in the study. Therapeutic use of the pacing catheter was defined as the need for pacing due to bradyarrhythmiasor conduction disorders or need of increasing heart rate in case of hemodynamic instability. Patients undergoing urgent oremergency surgery were excluded from the study.Results: A total of 517 patients were included in the study; mean age was 68.3 ± 10.4 years and 289 (55.9%) were men; 115 patients(22.2%) underwent mitral valve replacement and 402 (77.7%) mitral valve repair. The following concomitant procedureswere carried out: 294 (56.9%) Maze procedures, 182 (35.2%) left atrial appendage closures, 9 (1.7%) atrial septal defect closuresand 14 (2.7%) tricuspid valve repair surgeries. In the postoperative period 162 (31.3%) patients required pacing due to bradyarrhythmiasin 85 cases (52.47%), conduction disorders in 50 (30.86%), and need to increase heart rate in 27 (16.66%) patientswith low cardiac output syndrome. Postoperative mortality was 2.32% (n=12). Fourteen (2.7%) patients presented loss of capturethat was resolved with catheter repositioning, while 2 (0.6%) patients presented catheter entrapment requiring reintervention.Conclusion: Almost one-third of the patients undergoing lateral mini-thoracotomy required therapeutic use of the pacingSwan-Ganz catheter. Two patients presented catheter entrapment and required surgical reintervention

Although the hemodynamic burden and structural substrate contribute to valvular atrial fibrillation (VAF) mechanisms, the role of catheter ablation has rarely been reported. We investigated the clinical characteristics, mapping findings, and long-term rhythm outcomes after catheter ablation of hemodynamically corrected VAF.We compared 77 patients with VAF (46.8% male, 52.7±8.8 years old, 46.8% paroxysmal AF, 24.7% with maze procedures) and 2244 patients with non-VAF (NVAF) who underwent catheter ablation. Among the VAF patients, 44 (57.1%) had mechanical valve AF (MV-AF) and 33 (42.9%) underwent a prior mitral valvuloplasty (MVP-AF). We analyzed the catheter ablation rhythm outcomes for MV-AF and MVP-AF.The left atrial (LA) diameter was greater (p0.001), LA voltage lower (p0.001), and procedure-related complication rate higher (mainly sinus node dysfunction, p=0.004) for VAF than NVAF. During 70.2±1.8 months of follow-up, the rhythm outcome of VAF did not significantly differ from that of NVAF after catheter ablation (log rank p=0.399), even after excluding patients with maze procedures (log rank p=0.629). The clinical recurrence rates did not differ between the MV-AF and MVP-AF groups (log rank p=0.244), or between patients with prior maze procedures and those without (log rank p=0.651). The main conduction recovery sites of previous maze procedures were the perimitral (84.2%) and cavotricuspid isthmus (84.2%) areas, and recurrence mechanisms were macroreentry (63.2%) and focal/microreentry (26.3%) at scar border zones.Although hemodynamically corrected VAF was associated with advanced LA remodeling, the rhythm outcome did not significantly differ from that of NVAF after catheter ablation.

Clinicians can feel confident about performing mitral repair/replacement in patients who have previously undergone mammoplasty. It may also have applications in performing atrial septal defect closure, Maze procedures for atrial fibrillation, and tricuspid valve surgery in patients with breast implants.

Background The Cox maze procedure is the gold-standard concomitant surgical procedure to restore sinus rhythm in rheumatic mitral valve disease with atrial fibrillation. Left atrial reduction surgery was found to be beneficial for rhythm conversion, but no study has investigated its efficacy compared to the Cox maze procedure for atrial contractility restoration. We aimed to compare the early success rate of left atrial contractility restoration with the Cox maze procedure and left atrial reduction in rheumatic subjects. Methods Preoperative and within one-month postoperative electrocardiograms and echocardiograms of patients who underwent a Cox maze IV procedure or left atrial reduction with mitral valve surgery were compared. Effective atrial contraction was defined as A wave peak velocity ≥10 cm·s−1 or atrial filling fraction ≥20%. Results Ninety patients (mean age 40.6 ± 10.2 years, 66.7% female) were divided equally into group A (Cox maze IV) and group B (left atrial reduction). The early sinus rhythm conversion rate was 64.4% versus 24.4% ( p −2 was an independent variable associated with early atrial contractility restoration in both groups (prevalence rate 0.97, p = 0.007). Conclusions In rheumatic subjects, the early sinus rhythm conversion rate was significantly higher after Cox maze IV compared to left atrial reduction, but for restoring left atrial contractility, left atrial reduction was not inferior to Cox maze IV.

Objective Newly published guidelines made the highest level recommendation for surgical treatment for atrial fibrillation. However, the number of patients without a mitral valve procedure with atrial fibrillation who are treated with concomitant surgical ablation is still low (15%-25%), because surgeons are reluctant to perform procedures in patients who would not otherwise require left atriotomy. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of concomitant Cox maze with and without mitral valve procedures. Methods Patients who underwent concomitant Cox maze procedures were prospectively followed since September 2005. Of the 711 patients, 238 did not receive mitral valve surgery. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance preoperative characteristics between patients with and without mitral valve procedures (164/group after matching). Results Before matching, patients in the mitral valve group were younger (65 vs 67 years, P = .047) and had higher euroSCORE II (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation; 3.2% vs 2.6%, P = .002), larger mean left atrial size (5.3 vs 4.8 cm, P Conclusions The Cox maze procedure is safe and effective with comparable outcomes when performed concomitant to mitral valve or non–mitral valve surgery. Surgeons should base the decision to perform surgical ablation procedures on atrial fibrillation pathophysiology and the benefit to patients, not on the type of concomitant procedure.

Significant recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias are observed after the surgical Cox Maze procedure (CMP). We retrospectively enrolled 11 consecutive patients who had atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) that recurred after a biatrial CMP and underwent catheter ablation. Information including the site of any incomplete lesions and the etiology of the clinical ATAs was shared with the surgical team as feedback. In a total of 11 patients, 12 clinical ATAs were identified. They consisted of 2 atrial fibrillations and 10 atrial tachycardias (ATs). In 6 patients, the CMP was performed after the beginning of this investigation. In a total of 10 ATs, we diagnosed 5 mitral annular flutters, 2 roof-dependent flutters, 1 pulmonary vein (PV)-reentrant AT, and 1 localized reentrant AT. A total of 6 patients had reconnected perimitral block lines. PV reconnections were observed in 3 and posterior wall (PW) residual conduction was also observed in 3 cases. However, no residual conduction of the pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and only 1 residual conduction of the PW were observed in 5 patients who underwent their index surgery after the beginning of this investigation. This fact may implicate that sharing the information from the electrophysiological study of postsurgical ATAs with the surgical team may contribute to the refinement of the CMP in each facility.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in the United States and remains a major cause of significant morbidity and mortality. Current treatment options include medical management, catheter ablation, and surgical techniques, which have been improved over the past decades through surgical innovation and advancement in instrumentation. The gold standard of surgical treatment for AF is the Cox-maze procedure (CMP). First introduced clinically in 1987, the procedure used multiple incisions in the left and right atria to eliminate AF. This cut-and-sew technique was subsequently replaced by the CMP-IV with the advent of bipolar radiofrequency and cryoablation technology. The modern ablation devices have made the CMP technically faster and more amenable to minimally invasive approaches. This manuscript reviews the surgical technique of the CMP-IV through a median sternotomy approach.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia. It increases the risk of thromboembolic stroke, anticoagulation induced bleeding, and the overall mortality. Restoration of the sinus rhythm may improve the quality of life and reduce the mortality. The classic ‘cut and sew’ cox maze procedure is the gold standard; however, it is complex. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation is faster and simpler. Methods: This study included 129 patients. They underwent bipolar radiofrequency ablation for their AF in concomitant with their cardiac surgery from 2008 throughout 2016 in Morriston hospital in UK. Patients were followed up for 6 months and divided according to their rhythm at 6 months into sinus group and AF group. Peri-operative data were collected. Comparison between the two groups was done to determine the predicting factors for the restoration of the sinus rhythm. Results: 42 patients were in AF in 6 months, while 87 patients restored their sinus rhythm. The two groups were compared according to different parameters. The results were tabulated and analysed using different tests. The significant predicting factors were left atrial diameter (P=0.004), type of AF (P=0.005), duration of AF (P

Bo Jiang,* Ji-Wei Gu,* Yan-Yan Song, Lei Bai, Xu-Dong Liu, Yu-Jing Zhang, Ming-Liang Li, Jian Yang, Li Liu, Yun Wang Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Yun WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, No. 804 Shengli South Street, Xingqing District, Yinchuan, 750004, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +86 6743014Email wangyun_21dr@163.comObjective: To investigate the therapeutic effects of a modified simultaneous unipolar saline-irrigated radiofrequency ablation by intracardiac operation under direct vision in patients with mitral valve diseases combined with atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods: A total of 168 patients with mitral valve diseases combined with AF who underwent unipolar saline-irrigated radiofrequency ablation modified maze procedures were enrolled and divided into the mitral stenosis (MS) group (n = 87) and the mitral insufficiency (MI) group (n = 81).Results: Those with a left atrium diameter (LAD) < 55 mm had a better cardioversion effect during the mid-term post-operation than those with a LAD ≥ 55 mm (P < 0.05). The cardioversion effect during the mid-term post-operation was better in those with a duration of AF < 2 years than those with AF ≥ 2 years (P < 0.05). The LAD reduced significantly during the early postoperative period in the MS group (P < 0.05). Compared with the early postoperative period, LAD further reduced, and the EF increased significantly during the mid-term post-operation (P< 0.05). The LAD reduced significantly during the early postoperative period in the MI group (P < 0.05), together with relatively decreased EF (P < 0.05). Compared with the early postoperative period, LAD further reduced, and the EF increased significantly during the mid-term post-operation (P< 0.05). The improvement of LAD in the MI group during the mid-term post-operation was better than that in the MS group (P < 0.05).Conclusion: The cardioversion effects and the improvement in cardiac function during the mid-term post-operation were good in the radiofrequency ablation by intracardiac operation under direct vision in patients with different mitral valve diseases combined with AF. The cardioversion effects during the early postoperative period and the mid-term post-operation were better in patients with MI than in those with MS.Keywords: mitral stenosis, mitral insufficiency, atrial fibrillation, radiofrequency ablation, therapeutic effect

Objectives Despite coherent guidelines, management of functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) consequences on outcome in the context of degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) remains controversial due to lacking series of large magnitude with rigorous application of tricuspid guidelines and strict long-term echocardiographic follow-up. Thus, we aimed at gathering such a cohort to examine outcomes of patients undergoing DMR surgery following tricuspid surgery guidelines. Methods All consecutive patients with isolated DMR 2005-2015 operated on with baseline FTR assessment and tricuspid annulus diameter measurement were identified. Operative complications, postoperative tricuspid regurgitation incidence, and survival were assessed overall and stratified by guideline-based tricuspid annuloplasty (TA) indication (severe FTR or tricuspid annulus diameter ≥40 mm). Results Among 441 patients with DMR undergoing mitral repair (66 ± 13 years, 30% female, ejection fraction 66 ± 10%, systolic pulmonary artery pressures 39 ± 12 mm Hg) followed 6 [3-9] years, patients with TA (n = 234, 53%) had generally similar presentation versus without TA (n = 207, 47%; all P ≥ .2) except for more atrial fibrillation and larger left ventricle (both P ≥ .0003). Patients with TA showed longer bypass time, more maze procedures (all P ≤ .001), but hospital stay, renal-failure, pacemaker implantation, and operative mortality (overall 0.9%) were comparable (all P ≥ .2). Postoperative incidence of moderate/severe FTR (0% at 1 year) became over time greater among patients without TA (5-year 8% [4%-13%] vs 3% [1%-11%] and 10-year 10% [6%-16%] vs 4% [1%-16%], P = .01). Survival (95% confidence interval) throughout follow-up was 85% (77%-89%) at 10 years, with hazard ratio 0.57 (0.29-1.10), P = .09. for patients with TA versus without. Conclusions In this large surgical DMR cohort, guideline-based FTR management was safe and effective. While long-term mortality did not reach significance, postoperative incidence of moderate/severe FTR, overall low, was nevertheless greater in patients who did not appear to require TA at surgery and linked to tricuspid annular dimension. Thus, future multicenter prospective cohorts with long-term follow-up are warranted to re-examine thresholds for TA performance and impact on survival.

Background The efficacy of catheter-based or thoracoscopic ablation for treating long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) with a dilated atrium remains suboptimal. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and initial results of simultaneous hybrid ablation with a new biatrial lesion set in these patients. Methods Twenty-seven consecutive patients with long-standing persistent AF and dilated atrium underwent simultaneous hybrid ablation with a new biatrial lesion set consistent with the principle of the Cox maze procedure at our institution. Patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure and annually thereafter. Results After thoracoscopic epicardial ablation, endocardial mapping confirmed complete bilateral pulmonary vein isolation in 25 patients (96.2%). All patients were followed for a mean of 18.7 ± 8.9 months. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia at 1 year after the single hybrid procedure was 64% with antiarrhythmic drugs and 60% without antiarrhythmic drugs. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia at latest follow-up after the hybrid procedure and redo catheter ablation was 77.8% with antiarrhythmic drugs and 74.1% without antiarrhythmic drugs. In patients with sinus rhythm restoration, mean left atrial diameter decreased from 54.4 ± 4.3 mm to 45.2 ± 4.1 mm (P, Graphical abstract

Papillary fibroelastomas represent the second most common benign cardiac tumour, secondary only to cardiac myxoma. A majority of patients are asymptomatic on presentation. The most common clinical manifestations include stroke, transient ischaemic attack, myocardial infarction and angina. Echocardiography remains the primary imaging modality for identification of these tumours. The majority of papillary fibroelastomas arise from the valves. Simple surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment, carrying an excellent prognosis. We present an unusual case of cardiac papillary fibroelastoma originating from the coumadin ridge (CR) in a 70-year-old woman. The patient exhibited increasing paroxysms of her atrial fibrillation and was pursuing a MAZE procedure. Preoperatively, a transesophageal echocardiogram revealed a 0.7×1 cm intracardiac mass that had echocardiographic appearance of a fibroelastoma. Surgical resection and MAZE procedures were performed. The gross specimen and histopathology findings were consistent with papillary fibroelastoma. This case reports the seventh documented case of fibroelastoma originating from the CR.

Objectives Stand-alone surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation is indicated in patients with refractory atrial fibrillation who have failed medical or catheter-based ablation. Few reports of late outcomes after stand-alone surgical ablation exist using comprehensive follow-up with strict definitions of success. This study examined our late outcomes of the stand-alone Cox-Maze IV procedure. Methods Between January 2003 and December 2019, 236 patients underwent a stand-alone Cox-Maze IV for refractory atrial fibrillation. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias was assessed by electrocardiography, Holter, or pacemaker interrogation for up to 10 years, with a mean follow-up of 4.8 ± 3.5 years. Rhythm outcomes were compared in multiple subgroups. Factors associated with recurrence were determined using Fine-Gray regression, allowing for death as the competing risk. Results The majority of patients (176/236, 75%) had nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation. Median duration of preoperative atrial fibrillation was 6.2 years (interquartile range, 3-11). Fifty-nine percent of patients (140/236) failed 1 or more prior catheter-based ablation. Thirteen patients (6%) experienced a major complication. There was no 30-day mortality. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias was 94% (187/199), 89% (81/91), and 77% (24/31) at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. There was no difference in freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias between patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation versus nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (P > .05) or those undergoing sternotomy versus a minimally invasive approach (P > .05). Increased left atrial size and number of catheter ablations were associated with late atrial fibrillation recurrence. For patients who experienced any atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence, the median number of recurrences was 1.5 (1.0-3.0). Conclusions The stand-alone Cox-Maze IV had excellent late efficacy at maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with symptomatic, refractory atrial fibrillation, with low morbidity and no mortality. The Cox-Maze IV, in contrast to catheter-based ablation, was equally effective in patients with paroxysmal and nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation.

A prominent v wave on a capillary wedge or left atrial pressure tracings classically signify significant mitral regurgitation. However, infiltrative disease involving the left atrium and left atrial scar from prior catheter ablation or Maze procedures, may produce a similar waveform due to noncompliance of the left atrium.

Untreated atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and morbidity. Despite the current guidelines recommending surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation at the time of coronary artery bypass surgery, most patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease do not receive surgical ablation for their atrial fibrillation. This review reports the efficacy of different surgical ablation techniques used for the treatment of atrial fibrillation during coronary artery bypass. PubMed was systematically searched for studies reporting outcomes of concomitant surgical ablation in coronary artery bypass patients between January 2002 and March 2018. Data were independently extracted and analyzed by two investigators. Twenty-four studies were included. Twelve studies exclusively reported outcomes of surgical ablation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass, whereas the remaining 12 reported outcomes of concomitant cardiac surgery with subgroup analysis. Only four studies performed the concomitant Cox-Maze procedure. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia was reported as high as 98% at 1 year and 76% at 5 years with Cox-Maze procedure, whereas lesser lesion sets had more variable outcomes, ranging from 35% to 93%. In most studies, the addition of surgical ablation was not associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although the Cox-Maze procedure had the greatest short- and long-term success rates, most studies comprising the evidence documenting the safety and efficacy of adding surgical ablation were of low or moderate quality. There was a great deal of heterogeneity among study populations, follow-up times, methods, and definition of failure. To establish a consensus regarding a surgical ablation technique for atrial fibrillation in coronary artery bypass population, larger multicenter randomized controlled studies need to be designed.

We examined the outcome of modified-maze procedures reflecting a single-center strategy in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with atrial septal defect (ASD) in adults. A retrospective chart review was performed for 29 patients who underwent surgical ASD closure and 2 types of maze procedures (full and simplified maze procedures) for AF. The outcome related to the each procedure was examined. A Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to assess the independent predictors of AF and atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. The rates of freedom from AF and AT recurrence at 1 and 4 years were 86.6% and 72.2% in the full maze group and 78.5% and 62.8% in the simplified maze group, respectively (p = 0.70). The only risk factor for recurrence was the age at the time of surgery. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis gave an optimum cut-off value of 58 years of age for predicting recurrence within 2 years (58.4% for ≥ 58 years versus 5.9% for

Background: Limited comparative data are available on the efficacy of cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. This study aimed to compare radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation with regard to clinical outcomes and the restoration of sinus rhythm or atrial contractility. Methods: A total of 239 patients who underwent surgical ablation between August 2003 and December 2016 at our institution were included. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the energy device that was used (group A: n=140, radiofrequency ablator; group B: n=99, cryoablator). Echocardiographic data, overall survival, and major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE)-free survival were compared between the 2 groups. Results: At 1 year of follow-up, the atrial contractility recovery rate was 32.2% (19 of 59) in group A and 48.8% (21 of 44) in group B. In addition, cryoablation was found to be a predictive factor for the recovery of atrial contractility (cryoablation vs. radiofrequency ablation: odds ratio, 2.540; 95% confidence interval, 1.063-6.071; p=0.036). The left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly higher in group B (53.1%±11.5% vs. 59.1%±6.3%, p=0.001). The median follow-up duration was 36 months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 80.1%±3.6% in group A and 92.1%±2.9% in group B (p=0.400). The 5-year MACCE-free survival rate was 70.3%±4.0% in group A and 70.9%±5.6% in group B (p=0.818). Conclusion: Cryoablation was associated with a higher atrial contractility restoration rate and better left ventricular function than radiofrequency ablation. However, no significant relationship was observed between the energy source and overall or MACCE-free survival.

The exact mechanism of atrial fibrillation (AF) is still incompletely understood. A number of alterations that impact focal electrical discharge, the atrial substrate and modulating factors contribute to its pathogenesis. Atrial remodelling (resulting in atrial cardiomyopathy) sets the stage for AF development. Once present, AF results in the loss of synchronized atrial contraction, which affects ventricular filling and atrial reservoir and conduit functions. Passive atrial function is particularly important in patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. AF can cause tachycardiomyopathy, a mostly reversible cardiac alteration induced by tachycardia. At a structural level, atrial support is also instrumental to the function of atrioventricular valves. All of these functions can be recovered to variable degrees via rhythm control strategies. Surgical and hybrid ablation show very promising results, especially in patients with a more advanced disease substrate. This review highlights the pathophysiological aspects of AF related to left atrial function and their practical implications for surgical rhythm management.

The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients older than 75 years of age is expected to increase, and its treatment remains challenging. This study evaluated the impact of age on the outcomes of surgical ablation of AF.A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent the Cox-maze IV procedure at a single institution between 2005 and 2017. The patients were divided into a younger (age75 years, n = 548) and an elderly cohort (age ≥75 years, n = 148). Rhythm outcomes were assessed at 1 year and annually thereafter. Predictors of first atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence were determined using Fine-Gray regression, allowing for death as the competing risk.The mean age of the elderly group was 78.5 ± 2.8 years. The majority of patients (423/696, 61%) had nonparoxysmal AF. The elderly patients had a lower body mass index (P .001) and greater rates of hypertension (P = .011), previous myocardial infarction (P = .017), heart failure (P .001), and preoperative pacemaker (P = .008). Postoperatively, the elderly group had a greater rate of overall major complications (23% vs 14%, P = .017) and 30-day mortality (6% vs 2%, P = .026). The percent freedom from ATAs and antiarrhythmic drugs was lower in the elderly patients at 3 (69% vs 82%, P = .030) and 4 years (65% vs 79%, P = .043). By competing risk analysis, the incidence of first ATA recurrence was greater in elderly patients (33% vs 20% at 5 years; Gray test, P = .005). On Fine-Gray regression adjusted for clinically relevant covariates, increasing age was identified as a predictor of ATAs recurrence (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.05, P .001).The efficacy of the Cox-maze IV procedure was worse in elderly patients; however, the majority of patients remained free of ATAs at 5 years. The lower success rate in these greater-risk patients should be considered when deciding to perform surgical ablation.

The onset of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) following the Cox maze procedure (CMP) is commonly encountered, and may be associated with increased perioperative mortality. The majority of recurrent ATA cases are localized to the left atrium following surgical ablation. Right atrial flutter (AFL) following the CMP is a less-frequent occurrence, and may pose a diagnostic challenge due to uncharacteristic surface electrocardiogram (ECG) and intracardiac activation patterns. In this case, a 68-year-old male who had previously undergone left-sided surgical ablation with left atrial reduction for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation during coronary artery bypass and mitral valve repair developed symptomatic atypical AFL. The patient was intolerant to amiodarone, and was thus scheduled for ablation. Given the patient’s history of extensive left atrial instrumentation and surface ECG findings indicating an atypical AFL, the decision was made to proceed with left atrial mapping. During the electrophysiology study, initial activation mapping was not suggestive of a cavotricuspid isthmus reentrant arrhythmia. Here, we describe the possible mapping pitfalls associated with a persistent tachyarrhythmia that was ultimately proven to be a right AFL, despite atypical activation patterns.

Objective The Cox-Maze IV procedure has been shown to be an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation when performed concomitantly with other operations either via median sternotomy or right minithoracotomy. Few studies have compared these approaches in patients with lone atrial fibrillation. This study examined outcomes with sternotomy versus minithoracotomy in stand-alone Cox-Maze IV procedures at our institution. Methods Between 2002 and 2015, 195 patients underwent stand-alone biatrial Cox-Maze IV. Minithoracotomy was used in 75 patients, sternotomy in 120. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias was ascertained using electrocardiography, Holter, or pacemaker interrogation at 3 to 60 months. Predictors of recurrence were determined using logistic regression. Results Of 23 preoperative variables, the only differences between groups were that minithoracotomy patients had a higher rate of New York Heart Association 3/4 symptoms and a lower rate of previous stroke. Minithoracotomy and sternotomy patients had similar atrial fibrillation duration and type. Minithoracotomy patients had a smaller left atrial diameter (4.5 vs 4.8 cm, P = 0.03). More minithoracotomy patients received a box lesion (73/75 vs 100/120, P = 0.002). Minithoracotomy patients had a shorter hospital stay (7 vs 8 days, P = 0.009) and a similar rate of major complications (3/75 (4%) vs 7/120 (6%), P = 0.74). There were no differences in mortality or freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias. Predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence included a preoperative pacemaker, omission of the left atrial roof line, and New York Heart Association 3/4 symptoms. Conclusions Stand-alone Cox-Maze IV via minithoracotomy was as effective as via sternotomy with a shorter hospital stay. A minimally invasive approach is our procedure of choice.

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) as adjuvant to selective heart surgery attenuates cardiac injury and atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence. We investigated its effect on sinus rhythm (SR) restoration rate in permanent AF patients undergoing Cox maze (CM) radiofrequency ablation with concomitant mitral valve surgery. From May 2013 to May 2017, 206 patients with rheumatic valve disease concomitant with permanent AF were randomized to receive prosthesis valve replacement and CM radiofrequency ablation procedure with (n = 104) or without (n = 102) RIPC (intermittent arm ischaemia through three cycles of 5-min inflation, followed by 5-min deflation of a blood pressure cuff). The primary end point of the study was freedom from cumulative AF without using antiarrhythmic drugs 1 year after operation; the secondary end points included inflammation reaction index over 48 h postoperatively and clinical outcomes. Baseline characteristics and preoperative data did not differ between groups. The SR restoration rates were significantly higher in the RIPC group, 85.6%, 83.7%, and 82.7%, than those in the control group, 72.5%, 70.6%, and 69.6%, at discharge, 6 months and 12 months, respectively, after the radiofrequency ablation procedure (P

The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) has evolved significantly over the last 20 years and even more so in the last 5 years. There are now many clinically successful surgical procedures focused on eliminating AF and AF-related stroke. This review discusses the current types of surgical AF procedures, including minimally invasive and hybrid, and may assist clinicians in understanding the various surgical AF options available to patients today.

The Cox-Maze procedure is the most popular surgical procedure in the world for eliminating atrial fibrillation (AF). Japanese surgeons performed and modified its procedure. This review describes the concept of the Maze procedure, modifications of the Maze procedure and findings related to the Maze procedure obtained by Japanese surgeons. Original Cox-Maze procedures and modified Maze procedures developed by Japanese surgeons were reviewed chronologically. Japanese surgeons modified Cox-Maze II and III procedures, including Kosakai-Maze procedure, Cryo-Maze procedure, the Radial approach and the left atrial Maze procedure, and there were many midterm and long-term clinical results of the original and modified Maze procedures especially for AF associated with mitral valve disease. These modifications may be possible to elucidate the mechanism of paroxysmal AF. The mechanism of persistent AF is presumed to be multiple reentry based on the success of surgical approaches as well as electrophysiological study. Japanese surgeons have modified and simplified the Maze procedure, and have improved the Maze procedure as well as helped to clarify the mechanisms of AF.

The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been revolutionized over the past two decades through surgical innovation and improvements in endoscopic imaging, ablation technology, and surgical instrumentation. These advances have prompted the development of the less complex and less morbid Cox-Maze IV procedure, and have allowed its adaptation to a minimally invasive right mini-thoracotomy approach that can be used in stand-alone AF ablation and in patients undergoing concomitant mitral and tricuspid valve surgery. Other minimally invasive ablation techniques have been developed for stand-alone AF ablation, including video-assisted pulmonary vein isolation, extended left atrial lesion sets, and a hybrid approach. This review will discuss the tools, techniques, and outcomes of minimally invasive surgical procedures currently being practiced for AF ablation.

BACKGROUND Ganglionic plexi (GPs) have been implicated as triggers of atrial fibrillation (AF) and are known to have functional interconnections. Understanding these connections could result in a more effective ablation. The objective of this study is to assess relationships between right- and left-sided GPs in patients undergoing mini-maze (MM) surgery. We also analyzed the impact of these findings on AF recurrence. METHODS The GPs were accessed thoracoscopically right side first (group 1) or left side first (group 2). GPs were identified by high-frequency stimulation at 20 predetermined sites and ablation of GPs was performed using a selective or an empiric anatomic approach. Ganglionic plexus (GP) activity was then assessed on the contralateral side and ablated. RESULTS Sixty-seven patients underwent MM (45 patients in group 1 and 22 in group 2). Fewer patients with active left GPs (LGP) were noted in group 1 (13, 29%) as compared to group 2 (18, 82%). The number of active LGP was also lower (0.6 ± 1.2) in group 1 compared to group 2 (4.7 ± 2.7); P 0.05). There were no differences in atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT)/AF recurrence rates between groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.21). However, group 1 patients who underwent selective GP ablation alone had higher recurrence rates (P = 0.016). CONCLUSION Mapping and ablation of RGPs first decreased identifiable LGP activity. With selective GP ablation, patients who underwent RGP ablation first had higher AT/AF recurrence.

Data related to the cost effectiveness of surgical interventions and catheter ablation is sparse. This model-based analysis assessed the clinical and economic trade-offs involved in using catheter ablation or the Cox maze procedure in treating patients with atrial fibrillation.A deterministic model was developed to project 1 year and lifetime health-related outcomes, costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost effectiveness of each treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation. Using previously unpublished Inova Heart and Vascular Institute (IHVI) data for patients undergoing either procedure, 1 year cost and clinical efficacy inputs were estimated. This data was supplemented with published literature and used to estimate costs, utilities, mortality and likelihood of patient improvement. Results were reported as cost-effectiveness ratios in $/QALY. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of results.Patients initially treated with a Cox maze procedure were estimated to have higher costs than those treated with catheter ablation, both after 1 year and over the lifetime. However, patients undergoing the Cox maze procedure also had lower rates of 1 year mortality than catheter ablation patients (3.5% vs. 8.5%) and the highest rate of improvement following treatment, resulting in higher QALYs (12.4 vs. 10.2). Compared to catheter ablation, the lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the Cox maze surgical procedure was $12,794 per QALY gained. Without quality adjustment, the ratio was $11,315. Results were most sensitive to the likelihood of improvement following each intervention and the cost of the initial procedure.At a societal willingness to pay of $100,000/QALY, Cox maze procedure was found to both increase overall and quality-adjusted survival and constitute an effective use of resources in patients with atrial fibrillation.

The initial surgical attempts to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) were isolation procedures designed to confine the arrhythmia to a specific area of the heart for relief of symptoms. The first surgical attempt to ablate AF was unsuccessful but was quickly followed by the Maze-I procedure on September 25, 1987. Because of several adverse sequelae of the Maze-I procedure, it was sequentially modified to the Maze-II and then Maze-III procedures. The Maze-IV procedure was introduced some 10 years later; these are the only 4 procedures that adhere to the concept of a maze pattern of lesions to ablate AF and leave both atria capable of being activated during normal sinus rhythm. The term maze procedure has become generic for virtually any operation designed to treat AF, but procedures that do not adhere to the concept of creating lesions of conduction block in the pattern of a maze are not maze procedures. These include, among others, the Wolf Mini-Maze, the Left-Sided Maze, and the 5-Box Maze, none of which are truly based on the maze-pattern concept. The cardinal feature of maze procedures that is necessary for both effectiveness and comparability to classical maze procedures includes lines of conduction block that preclude macro-reentry anywhere in either atrium while leaving both atria capable of activation by a sinus-generated impulse. Components essential to achieving this include appropriate lesions in both atria, the absence of gaps that allow electrical activity to bypass an intended line of block, and the absence of alternate pathways by which impulses can reach the intended maze exit.

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the addition of surgical ablation to aortic valve replacement (AVR) does not increase procedural morbidity or mortality. However, efficacy in this population has not been carefully evaluated. This study compared outcomes between patients undergoing stand-alone Cox-Maze IV with those undergoing surgical ablation and concomitant AVR.From January 2002 to May 2014, 188 patients received a stand-alone Cox-Maze IV (n = 113) or surgical ablation with concomitant AVR (n = 75). In the concomitant AVR group, patients underwent Cox-Maze IV (n = 58), left-sided Cox-Maze IV (n = 3), or pulmonary vein isolation (n = 14). Thirty-one perioperative variables were compared. Freedoms from AF on and off antiarrhythmic drugs were evaluated at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.Follow-up was available in 97% of patients. Freedom from AF on and off antiarrhythmic drugs in patients receiving a stand-alone Cox-Maze IV versus concomitant AVR was not significantly different at any time point. The concomitant AVR group had more comorbidities, paroxysmal AF, pacemaker implantations (24% vs 5%, p = 0.002), and complications (25% vs 5%, p0.001). Freedoms from AF off antiarrhythmic drugs for patients receiving an AVR and pulmonary vein isolation at 1 year was only 50%, which was significantly lower than patients receiving an AVR and Cox-Maze IV ( 94%, p = 0.001).A Cox-Maze IV with concomitant AVR is as effective as a stand-alone Cox-Maze IV in treating AF, even in an older population with more comorbidities. Pulmonary vein isolation was not as effective and is not recommended in this population. A Cox-Maze IV should be considered in all patients undergoing AVR with a history of AF.