Search

Neuroinformatics is a research field that focusses on software tools capable of identifying, analysing, modelling, organising and sharing multiscale neuroscience data. Neuroinformatics has exploded in the last two decades with the emergence of the Big Data phenomenon, characterised by the so‐called 3Vs (volume, velocity and variety), which provided neuroscientists with an improved ability to acquire and process data faster and more cheaply thanks to technical improvements in clinical, genomic and radiological technologies. This situation has led to a 'data deluge', as neuroscientists can routinely collect more study data in a few days than they could in a year just a decade ago. To address this phenomenon, several neuroimaging‐focussed neuroinformatics platforms have emerged, funded by national or transnational agencies, with the following goals: (i) development of tools for archiving and organising analytical data (XNAT, REDCap and LabKey); (ii) development of data‐driven models evolving from reductionist approaches to multidimensional models (RIN, IVN, HBD, EuroPOND, E‐DADS and GAAIN BRAIN); and (iii) development of e‐infrastructures to provide sufficient computational power and storage resources (neuGRID, HBP‐EBRAINS, LONI and CONP). Although the scenario is still fragmented, there are technological and economical attempts at both national and international levels to introduce high standards for open and Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) neuroscience worldwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neurodegenerative diseases lead to memory disorders and cognitive impairments with major impacts on day‐to‐day function. Early detection of patients is essential for an efficient care approach, and differential diagnosis is essential for determining prognosis and tailoring management. Most research studies compare patients by pairwise comparison methods, but this does not correspond to daily clinical practice, in which clinicians need to distinguish many different possible types of dementia concomitantly. It has been shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can mark with good accuracy the different types of dementia, such as: Alzheimer's disease (AD), Frontotemporal dementia (FTD), Parkinson's disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Recently, Deep Learning approaches have started being used although differential diagnosis is still almost ignored. The aim of this study was to develop a Convolution Neural Network (CNN) to classify probable AD, FTD, DLB, PD and healthy elderly control (CN) subjects starting from Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI). Method: The cohort used in this study came from six different initiatives: ADNI1, NIFD2, NACC3, PDBP4, PPMI5 and Newcastle University6,7,8,9. We analysed a total of 108 CN, 110 AD, 135 FTD, 150 DLB, 132 PD. Demographic and neuropsychological characterization is shown in Table 1. The DTI scans were pre‐processed using the FMRIB software library (FSL) with eddy current correction, skull‐stripping and diffusion tensor calculation. We post‐processed the Fractional Anisotropy (FA) map using 3D CNN. The proposed CNN structure consisted of an image input layer, convolutional filters, several batch normalization with max‐pooling layers and, finally, the classification layer. A data augmentation approach was adopted that ultimately resulted in a dataset of 26'450 brain scans. A hold‐out validation (70% training set 30% test set) was performed. Result: We found excellent performance of the 3D CNN in discriminating the different neurodegenerative diseases. Figure 1 shows the confusion matrix with the following values for the area under the ROC curve in each class: 0.92 for CN, 0.90 for AD, 0.97 for DLB, 0.96 for FTD, 0.99 for PD. Conclusion: These results prove that Deep Learning and the 3D CCN method are suitable for clinical practice and provide additional clues that can help clinicians in diagnosis making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]