Search

High-resolution ultrasound (HRU) has recently demonstrated the potential to facilitate diagnosis and treatment of upper extremity compression neuropathy. The authors hypothesized that HRU can improve preoperative evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) and that changes in ulnar nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) after cubital tunnel release may correlate with outcomes. Nineteen adult patients diagnosed with UNE who were scheduled for surgical decompression by a single hand surgeon were enrolled. Electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing, HRU of the ulnar nerve, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, and McGowan grade were obtained pre- and postoperatively. Fourteen patients completed the study. Statistically significant improvements were found in CSA measurements and QuickDASH scores. High-resolution ultra-sound was found to confirm UNE in all 7 patients with positive results on EDX, and additionally detected UNE in 3 of 6 patients with negative results on EDX and in 1 patient with equivocal (nonlocalized) EDX testing. All 4 of these additional HRU-detected cases improved clinically and by CSA measurements after surgery. In this series, HRU was superior to EDX testing in the diagnosis of UNE and demonstrated objective improvement in ulnar nerve CSA after successful cubital tunnel release. This modality, which is better tolerated, less costly, and less time-consuming than EDX testing or magnetic resonance imaging, should therefore be considered in the diagnosis and surgical management of UNE, particularly in cases with negative or equivocal results on EDX testing, or when outcomes are suboptimal. [ Orthopedics . 2021;44(5):285–288.]

BACKGROUND Health-care expenditures in the U.S. are continually rising, prompting providers, patients, and payers to search for solutions to reduce costs while maintaining quality. The present study seeks to define the out-of-pocket price that patients undergoing hand surgery are willing to pay, and also queries the potential cost-cutting measures that patients are most and least comfortable with. We hypothesized that respondents would be less accepting of higher out-of-pocket costs. METHODS A survey was developed and distributed to paid, anonymous respondents through Amazon Mechanical Turk. The survey introduced 3 procedures: carpal tunnel release, cubital tunnel release, and open reduction and internal fixation of a distal radial fracture. Respondents were randomized to 1 of 5 out-of-pocket price options for each procedure and asked if they would pay that price. Respondents were then presented with various cost-saving methods and asked to select the options that made them most uncomfortable, even if those would save them out-of-pocket costs. RESULTS There were 1,408 respondents with a mean age of 37 years (range, 18 to 74 years). Nearly 80% of respondents were willing to pay for all 3 of the procedures regardless of which price they were presented. Carpal tunnel release was the most price-sensitive, with rejection rates of 17% at the highest price ($3,000) and 6% at the lowest ($250). Open reduction and internal fixation was the least price-sensitive, with rejection rates of 11% and 6% at the highest and lowest price, respectively. The use of older-generation implants was the least acceptable cost-cutting measure, at 50% of respondents. CONCLUSIONS The present study showed that most patients are willing to pay a considerable amount of money out of pocket for hand surgery after the condition, treatment, and outcomes are explained to them. Furthermore, respondents are hesitant to sacrifice advanced technology despite increased costs.

Endoscopic cubital tunnel release has gained popularity in recent years. Numerous case series, comparative studies, and meta-analysis have shown promising results as compared with open decompression in situ. Yet in situations where anterior transposition is needed, the ulnar nerve may still be transposed under endoscopic guidance, by the creation of an additional volar portal. This chapter describes its indications, technical tips, and potential complications of ulnar nerve endoscopy.

This cadaveric study tested the feasibility of decompressing the ulnar nerve across the elbow percutaneously with a commercially available surgical dissection thread, a guiding needle, hydrodissection and ultrasound guidance. We performed the procedure in 19 fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities. Subsequently, we did an anatomical dissection of the specimens to visualize the extent of ulnar nerve decompression and the extent of damage to surrounding structures. The cubital tunnel and deep across the medial elbow were completely transected leaving the ulnar nerve fully decompressed in all cases. There was no evidence of direct injury to the ulnar nerve or adjacent neurovascular structures. A prerequisite knowledge of sonographic anatomy and experience with interventional ultrasound is essential. Future clinical studies should evaluate this technique’s safety and efficacy compared with conventional ones.

Background The impact of Workers’ Compensation (WC) status on postoperative healthcare utilization in hand and wrist surgery clinical practice is presently unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the number of postoperative visits in WC to non-WC patients after common upper extremity surgical procedures. Methodology All patients who underwent one of four common surgical procedures (carpal tunnel release, De Quervain’s release, cubital tunnel release, and trigger finger release) between 2016 and 2019 were identified. A total of 64 surgeries billed under WC were randomly selected and matched 1:1 to surgeries billed outside of WC based on the primary CPT code. Results The most common procedure was carpal tunnel release (42 patients), followed by trigger finger release (30 patients), cubital tunnel release (28 patients), and De Quervain’s release (16 patients). The average number of postoperative visits was 2.3 (median = 2, range: 1-9) and was significantly higher in the WC group (mean/median = 3.0/3 versus 1.5/1, p < 0.001). Within the 90-day global postoperative billing period, the mean number of visits was 2.2 (median = 2, range: 1-4) in the WC group and 1.4 (median = 1, range: 1-3) in the non-WC group (p < 0.001). The average time to clinical discharge in the WC group was 101 days (range: 10-446 days), and in the non-WC group was 40 days (range: 7-474 days) (p < 0.001). Five patients (7.8%) in the WC group and four patients (6.3%) in the non-WC group were seen for unplanned visits after clinical discharge. Conclusions WC status conferred more postoperative visits after common upper extremity surgical procedures, both within and beyond the global billing period. Further investigation and targeted strategies are required to address the observed increase in healthcare utilization.

The relationship between surgery for cubital tunnel and carpal tunnel syndrome was examined in this retrospective study. Between 1997 and 2018, data from consecutive patients who underwent carpal tunnel release (8352 patients), cubital tunnel release (1681 patients) or both procedures (692 patients) were analysed. The relative risk of undergoing cubital tunnel release in the population who had carpal tunnel release compared with those with no carpal tunnel release was 15.3 (male 20.3; female 12.5). The relative risk of undergoing carpal tunnel release in the population who had cubital tunnel release compared with those who did not undergo carpal tunnel release was 11.5 (male 16.5; female 9.1). Our study showed that men and women who undergo carpal tunnel release are over 20 times and 10 times more likely to have cubital tunnel release than those who did not undergo carpal tunnel release, respectively. These findings suggest that the two conditions may share a similar aetiology. Level of evidence: IV

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common entrapment neuropathy after carpal tunnel syndrome and occurs as a result of compression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow level. Surgery is performed in cases that do not respond to conservative treatment and in cases with severe symptoms. Many surgical techniques such as in situ decompression, anterior transposition of the nerve, and medial epicondylectomy are used in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. In recent years, endoscopic decompression techniques have become popular. Along with improvements in endoscopic techniques, anterior ulnar nerve transfer has also been defined. Both open and endoscopic approaches have been reported with similar outcomes. Postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, and early return to work are features in which endoscopic technique is more advantageous than the open technique. In this chapter, Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release and its outcomes are discussed.

Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is a well-recognized compressive neuropathy worldwide. With technological advancement, endoscopy is introduced to facilitate the procedure. However, there are concerns about the excessive cost that comes with special instruments. This article aims to provide the results of the cost-saving endoscopic-assisted cubital tunnel release surgical technique that uses the normally available operating instruments. A retrospective review was performed of the nine patients that were diagnosed with CuTS and underwent minimal incision endoscopic-assisted cubital tunnel release in Police General Hospital. Patients were followed up to sixth month postoperation. The modified McGowan classification was used to determine the severity of symptoms. Surgical outcomes were evaluated by the modified Bishop classification, visual analog score (VAS), and patients' satisfaction. Other factors investigated were scar pain and peri-incisional numbness and hematomas. The incisions were measured as 7-9 mm. All patients reported having a pain score of 1 on the third day. Seven of nine patients were able to return to work one day after surgery. Modified Bishop score showed five excellence, three good, and one fair after two weeks. There was no surgical-related complication found. All patients noted the excellence satisfaction of the procedure. The minimal incision endoscopic-assisted cubital tunnel release has shown favorable outcomes with the cost-saving of simple instruments. However, a large prospective trial may be needed for further study.

Background: Electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) serve a prominent role in the diagnostic workup of cubital tunnel syndrome (CBTS), but their reported sensitivity varies widely. The goals of our study were to determine the sensitivity of EDX in a cohort of patients who responded well to surgical cubital tunnel release (CBTR), and whether the implementation of the Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) criteria improves the sensitivity. Methods: We identified 118 elbows with clinical CBTS who had preoperative EDX and underwent CBTR. The EDX diagnoses were CBTS, ulnar neuropathy (UN), and normal ulnar nerves. We divided the 118 elbows into those that received above-elbow stimulation (XE group) and those that did not (non-XE group). We calculated the sensitivities for all groups and reinterpreted the results according to the AANEM guidelines. Results: Cubital tunnel release provided significant relief in 93.6% of the elbows. Based on the EDX reports, 11% patients had clear CBTS, 23% had UN, and 66% showed no UN. The sensitivities were 11.7% for CBTS and 34.2% for any UN. In the XE group, the sensitivity of the EDX reports for CBTS and UN climbed to 33.3% and 58.3%, respectively. When we calculated the across-elbow motor nerve conduction velocity, the sensitivity for CBTS and UN was 87.5% and 100%, respectively. The XE and non-XE groups showed no difference except for sex, bilaterality, concomitant carpal tunnel release, and obesity ( P < .05). Conclusion: Implementing AANEM guidelines results in significant improvement in correlation of clinical and electrodiagnostic findings of CBTS.

Peripheral nerve injuries and brachial plexus injuries are relatively frequent. Significance of these injuries lies in the fact that the majority of patients with these types of injuries constitute working population. Since these injuries may create disability, they present substantial socioeconomic problem nowadays. This article will present current state-of-the-art achievements of minimal invasive brachial plexus and peripheral nerve surgery. It is considered that the age of the patient, the mechanism of the injury, and the associated vascular and soft-tissue injuries are factors that primarily influence the extent of recovery of the injured nerve. The majority of patients are treated using classical open surgical approach. However, new minimally invasive open and endoscopic approaches are being developed in recent years—endoscopic carpal and cubital tunnel release, targeted minimally invasive approaches in brachial plexus surgery, endoscopic single-incision sural nerve harvesting, and there were even attempts to perform endoscopic brachial plexus surgery. The use of the commercially available nerve conduits for bridging short nerve gap has shown promising results. Multidisciplinary approach individually designed for every patient is of the utmost importance for the successful treatment of these injuries. In the future, integration of biology and nanotechnology may fabricate a new generation of nerve conduits that will allow nerve regeneration over longer nerve gaps and start new chapter in peripheral nerve surgery.

Background: Cubital tunnel syndrome (CUT) is the second most common peripheral neuropathy with an annual incidence of 24.7 per 100 000, affecting nearly twice as many men as women. With increasing focus on cost-effectiveness and cost-containment in medicine, a critical understanding of utilization of health care resources for open and endoscopic approaches for cubital tunnel release is of value. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the costs and utilization trends of open and endoscopic cubital tunnel release. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a Medicare database within the PearlDiver Supercomputer (Warsaw, Indiana) for procedures performed from 2005 to 2012. Annual utilization, charges, reimbursement, demographic data, and compound annual growth rate were evaluated. Results: Our query returned 262 104 patients with CUT, of which 69 378 (26.5%) and 4636 (1.8%) were surgically managed with open and endoscopic release respectively. Average charges were higher in endoscopic release ($3798) than open release ($3197) while reimbursements were higher in open releases ($1041) than endoscopic release, ($866). Both were performed most commonly in the

Critical review of surgical outcomes is vital to optimizing patient care. Multiple studies have ventured to address outcomes after cubital tunnel surgery. Due to variation in surgical technique, limited objective data, and inconsistency in measured outcome variables between studies, obtaining any generalized conclusions on anticipated postoperative outcomes remains somewhat challenging. This chapter reviews the available literature on outcomes after cubital tunnel release.

Muscle herniation in the upper extremity is a rare but recognized phenomenon with a paucity of reports in the current literature. In the majority of cases, the herniation is secondary to trauma, with some of the cases due to muscle hypertrophy and increased intra-compartmental pressure from the forced exertion. Treatment for this condition ranges from nonsurgical, repair, or reconstruction to fasciotomy of the flexor carpi ulnaris fascia. Here, we present a case of flexor carpi ulnaris herniation after an open in situ cubital tunnel release in a 57-year-old male 6 years after initial surgery. The patient’s symptoms did not improve with conservative management, and the patient subsequently underwent endoscopic fasciotomy with resolution of his symptoms and maintenance of his wrist and grip strength. The rationale for the treatment chosen is discussed.

Up to 25% of patients treated for cubital tunnel syndrome will have incomplete symptom relief, and approximately 5.7% will undergo a revision surgery. Patients can be classified as either having persistent, recurrent, or new symptoms. Evaluation should include a thorough physical examination followed by electrodiagnostic studies. Once the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome is confirmed and symptoms are not attributable to chronic nerve damage, patients may elect to undergo secondary surgery which involves external neurolysis with or without anterior transposition of the nerve. In the setting of recurrent symptoms, allograft and autograft may be used to minimize postoperative perineural scarring to the nerve. Patients can expect an improvement in their symptoms and function and however commonly have residual deficits independent of the secondary procedure performed.

Background: Although cubital tunnel release is a commonly performed orthopaedic procedure, the overall incidence of and independent risk factors for infection largely remain undefined in the current literature. Purpose: To establish the rate of postoperative infection after isolated cubital tunnel release and define relevant patient-related risk factors. Study Design: Case-control study; Level 3. Methods: All Medicare-insured patients undergoing ulnar nerve decompression at the cubital tunnel from 2010 through 2012 were identified. A multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis was utilized to evaluate the impact of patient-related risk factors for postoperative infection. Results: A total of 330 (2.17%) postoperative infections were identified in 15,188 cases. The majority (87%) were managed nonoperatively, while 13% required surgical debridement. The most significant risk factors for infection included hemodialysis use (odds ratio [OR], 2.47), chronic anemia (OR, 2.24), age Conclusion: The present study was adequately powered to determine numerous patient-related risk factors for infection following cubital tunnel release.

Compressive neuropathies of the upper extremity are common and can result in profound disability if left untreated. Nerve releases are frequently performed, but can be complicated by both iatrogenic events and progression of neuropathy. In this review, we examine the management of postoperative complications after 2 common nerve compression release procedures: carpal tunnel release and cubital tunnel release.

Purpose Several studies have drawn a connection between cigarette smoking and cubital tunnel syndrome. One comparison article demonstrated worse outcomes in smokers treated with transmuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve. However, very little is known about the effect that smoking might have on patients who undergo ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of smoking preoperatively on outcomes in patients treated with ulnar nerve decompression. Materials and Methods This study used a survey developed from the comparison article with additional questions based on outcome measures from supportive literature. Postoperative improvement was probed, including sensation, strength, and pain scores. A thorough smoking history was obtained. The study spanned a 10-year period. Results A total of 1,366 surveys were mailed to former patients, and 247 surveys with adequate information were returned. No significant difference was seen in demographics or comorbidities. Patients who smoked preoperatively were found to more likely relate symptoms of pain. Postoperatively, nonsmoking patients generally reported more favorable improvement, though these findings were not statistically significant. Conclusion This study finds no statistically significant effect of smoking on outcomes after ulnar nerve decompression. Finally, among smokers, there were no differences in outcomes between simple decompression and transposition.

Case: We report the case of a fifty-one-year-old woman who underwent an uneventful cubital tunnel release and was admitted five days after surgery with a diagnosis of infection. Despite multiple surgical debridements and prolonged intravenous antibiotic treatment, the wound edges continued to slough and necrose. A delayed diagnosis of postsurgical pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) was made, and corticosteroid and immunosuppressive treatment was administered, with immediate clinical improvement. Conclusion: When apparent postoperative infections fail to improve with debridement and antimicrobial treatment, and when accompanied by a fever and severe local pain, nonspecific histopathological findings, and negative microbiological cultures, postsurgical PG should be considered.

Background Resolution of symptoms including pain, numbness, and tingling outside of the median nerve distribution has been shown to occur following carpal tunnel release. We hypothesized that a similar effect would be found after release of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Methods Twenty patients with isolated cubital tunnel syndrome were prospectively enrolled. The upper extremity was divided into six zones, and the location of pain, numbness, tingling, or strange sensations was recorded pre-operatively. Two-point discrimination, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing, and validated questionnaires were collected. The same data were collected at 6-week follow-up. Paired t tests or non-parametric Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests were used where appropriate to examine for significant ( p≤0.05) changes between pre- and post-operative scores. Results Probability of resolution was greater outside of the ulnar nerve distribution than within at early follow-up. There was a decrease in pain, numbness, and tingling symptoms both within and outside the ulnar distribution after cubital tunnel release. There was a decrease in pain as measured by several validated questionnaires. Conclusion This study documents resolution of symptoms in an extra-ulnar distribution after cubital tunnel release. Improvement in pain and function after cubital tunnel release may be associated with an improvement in symptoms both within and outside the ulnar nerve distribution. Future studies could be directed at correlating pre-operative disease severity with probability of extra-territorial symptom resolution using a larger sample population.

Background The objective was to evaluate recovery characteristics of patients undergoing endoscopic cubital tunnel release (ECuTR) by determining the following: (1) return to work (RTW) times following ECuTR compared with RTW times of patients that underwent anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve (ATUN), (2) satisfaction rates and factors affecting satisfaction, (3) resolution rates of common preoperative complaints and findings, and (4) effect of preoperative ulnar nerve subluxation on postoperative outcomes. Methods A total of 172 cases in 148 patients undergoing ECuTR were prospectively enrolled including 56 women and 92 men. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to determine RTW time for ECuTR patients and for a cohort of 15 patients that underwent ATUN. Patients were evaluated for subjective and objective complaints preoperatively and ***post-operatively. Cases were grouped by Dellon's classification preoperatively and modified by Bishop's postoperatively. Results Half of ECuTR patients returned to normal work within 8 days postoperatively versus 71 days following ATUN. Variables significantly negatively affecting RTW were male sex, manual labor, and worker's compensation status. Dellon's was the best predictor of postoperative satisfaction. Complete resolution of symptoms occurred in 86 % of patients for weakness, 81 % for pain, 79 % for numbness and tingling (N/T), 78 % for atrophy, 76 % for abnormal two-point discrimination, and 65 % for Wartenberg's. Preoperative ulnar nerve subluxation had no effect on outcome. Conclusions Improved RTW time following ECuTR versus ATUN indicates potential and substantial cost-saving implications with respect to reduced worker productivity loss. Patients with more severe preoperative Dellon's classification can expect less optimal results regarding postoperative satisfaction and resolution rates of N/T and pain.

The most common site of ulnar nerve compression is within the cubital tunnel. Surgery has historically involved an open cubital tunnel release with or without transposition of the nerve. A comparative study has demonstrated that endoscopic decompression is as effective as open decompression and has the advantages of being less invasive, utilizing a smaller incision, producing less local symptoms, causing less vascular insult to the nerve, and resulting in faster recovery for the patient. Ulnar nerve transposition is indicated with symptomatic ulnar nerve instability or if the ulnar nerve is located in a "hostile bed" (eg, osteophytes, scarring, ganglions, etc.). Transposition has previously been performed as an open procedure. The authors describe a technique of endoscopic ulnar nerve release and transposition. Extra portals are used to allow retractors to be inserted, the medial intermuscular septum to be excised, cautery to be used, and a tape to control the position of the nerve. In our experience this minimally invasive technique provides good early outcomes. This report details the indications, contraindications, surgical technique, and rehabilitation of the endoscopic ulnar nerve release and transposition.

The aim of the study is to introduce a new minimally invasive technique for ulnar nerve release and transposition.From January 2010 to May 2011, 51 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome were treated through a 1.5 to 2 cm incision. Limb functional recovery, scar esthetics, sensitivity of scar, numbness of the operating area, and patient satisfaction were assessed.No wound hematoma nor infection was observed in the group. The time of operation was 36 ± 17.2 minutes. At the final follow-up of 63 ± 7.3 months, 2-point discrimination of the small finger was improved from 6.3 ± 2.2 mm to 5.2 ± 2.4 mm. Grip and pinch strength of the hand were improved from 14.2 ± 7.7 kg and 3.7 ± 2.4 kg to 35.2 ± 12.7 kg and 4.1 ± 2.8 kg, respectively. The motor nerve conduction velocity was improved from 36.5 ± 11.2 to 44.6 ± 6.7 (m/sec). The Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm, and Hand questionnaire score was improved from 37.2 ± 23.8 to 10.5 ± 9.6. No patients reported scar pain, sensitivity of scar, or numbness of the operating area. No revision surgery was needed. Michigan Hand Outcome score for aesthetics was 94.6%±5.1 and satisfaction was 92 ± 8, respectively. We obtained 33 excellent, 12 good, 5 fair, and 1 poor result.Ulnar nerve decompression with anterior transposition can be safely and effectively accomplished through the small incision. It can be an alternative technique producing good appearance.

Background: Several surgical techniques exist for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Endoscopic cubital tunnel release (ECTuR) has been recently reported as a promising minimally invasive technique. This study aims to compare outcomes and complications of open cubital tunnel release (OCTuR) and ECTuR in the treatment of idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome. Methods: A systematic review of the literature (1980-2014) identified 118 citations. Studies including adults with idiopathic cubital tunnel treated exclusively by ECTuR or OCTuR were included. Outcomes of interest were postoperative grading, complications, number of reoperations, and the need for intraoperative conversion to another technique. Postoperative outcomes were combined into a uniform scale with 4 categories: “excellent,” “good,” “fair,” and “poor.” Results: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria (17 observational and 3 comparative), representing 425 open and 556 endoscopic decompressions. In the open group, 79.8% experienced “good” or “excellent” results with 12% complication rate and 2.8% reoperation rate. In the endoscopic group, 81.8% experienced “good” or “excellent” results with 9% complication rate and 1.6% reoperation rate. Meta-analysis of 3 comparative studies demonstrated a significantly lower overall complication rate with ECTuR. Subgroup analysis of complications revealed a significantly higher incidence of scar tenderness and elbow pain with OCTuR. Conclusions: The current study demonstrates similar effectiveness between the endoscopic (ECTuR) and open (OCTuR) techniques for treatment of idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome with similar outcomes, complication profiles, and reoperation rates.

This chapter details the steps in performing an open approach to cubital tunnel in situ decompression. Decompression is achieved by ulnar nerve dissection and fascia release for minimal compression and traction of the ulnar nerve. Indications, essential steps, postoperative care, and sample operative dictation are included.

Most patients (>90%) will have continued or recurrent symptoms after primary cubital tunnel release. Those patients with severe preoperative findings are at a higher risk of failure. Failed primary surgery may be due to diagnostic, technical, or biologic factors. Revision surgical interventions can provide relief, but there is no consensus on what is the optimal technique. The options for revision surgery include simple neurolysis, neurolysis with subcutaneous transposition, and neurolysis with submuscular transposition. Autogenous (vein) and non-autogenous nerve wraps may be placed around the nerve to prevent cicatrix reformation.

Background: Endoscopic cubital tunnel release has been proposed as an alternative to open in situ release. However, it is difficult to analyze outcomes after endoscopic release, as only a few small case series exist. Methods: The electronic databases of PubMed (1960-June 2014) were systematically screened for studies related to endoscopic cubital tunnel release or open in situ cubital tunnel release. Baseline characteristics, clinical scores, and complication rates were abstracted. The binary outcome was defined as rate of excellent/good response versus fair/poor. Complications were recorded into 3 categories: wound problems, persistent ulnar nerve symptoms, and other. Results: We included 8 articles that reported the clinical outcomes after surgical intervention including a total of 494 patients (344 endoscopic, 150 open in situ). The pooled rate of excellent/good was 92.0% (88.8%-95.2%) for endoscopic and 82.7% (76.15%-89.2%) for open. We identified 18 articles that detailed complications including a total of 1108 patients (691 endoscopic, 417 open). The 4 articles that listed complication rates for both endoscopic and open techniques were analyzed and showed a pooled odds ratio of 0.280 (95% confidence interval, 0.125-0.625), indicating that endoscopic patients have reduced odds of complications. Conclusions: The results of this systematic review suggest that there is a difference in clinical outcomes between the open in situ and endoscopic cubital tunnel release, with the endoscopic technique being superior in regard to both complication rates along with patient satisfaction.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to contrast the rate and types of complications and secondary surgeries for in situ cubital tunnel release and ulnar nerve transposition. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed by query of hospital billing records for all patients who underwent cubital tunnel surgery from August 2008 to July 2013, yielding 421 patients. Exclusion criteria were acute trauma, revision surgery, neoplasm, age younger than 18 years, incomplete records, and postoperative follow-up less than 3 months. Of the remaining 234 patients, 147 patients underwent 157 in situ cubital tunnel releases and 87 patients underwent 90 ulnar nerve transpositions. Results In 157 in situ cubital tunnel releases, there were 6 complications (3.8%), including 3 cases (1.9%) of ulnar nerve instability, 2 cases (1.3%) of postoperative infection, and 1 case (0.6%) of a postoperative seroma. In 90 ulnar nerve transpositions, there were 2 complications (2.2%), including 1 case (1.1%) of postoperative infection and 1 case (1.1%) of medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury. The secondary surgery rate was 5.7% overall, 2.5% for in situ cubital tunnel release, and 11.1% for ulnar nerve transposition. Chronic kidney disease was associated with complication after cubital tunnel surgery. Prior trauma to the elbow and ulnar nerve transposition were associated with secondary surgery. Conclusions The short-term complication rates of cubital tunnel surgery are low (3.2%), but higher for patients with chronic kidney disease. The secondary surgery rate after cubital tunnel surgery was 5.7% overall, but higher for patients with prior elbow trauma and for patients undergoing ulnar nerve transposition. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic IV.

Background: We aimed to report the clinical and electrophysiological results of patients who were treated with an endoscopically assisted in situ release technique for cubital tunnel syndrome and to show safety and efficacy of this procedure. Materials and methods: Twenty nine patients were included into the study. 13 patients (44.8%) were female, 16 patients (55.2%) were male. The mean age was 44.4 years (range; 22–66 years). Mean follow up period was 16.0 months (range; 7–42 months). We used Dellon classification for preoperative staging, and modified Bishop rating system for the evaluation of postoperative clinical results. Dynamometric and electromyographic measurements were obtained preoperatively and at final control. Results: Preoperative Dellon's classification revealed 3 patients grade 1, 14 grade 2, and 12 grade 3. Modified Bishop score was very good for 21 patients (72.4%), good for 4 patients (13.8%), fair for 3 patient (10.3%), and poor for 1 patient (3.4%). At final control; the mean proportion of grip power and pinch strength of the affected hand to the contralateral normal hand was improved, and also nerve conduction velocity were improved in all patients. As complication, hematoma formation developed in two cases. Conclusion: Our study showed that endoscopically assisted decompression technique without using any special instruments can be performed successfully with a low complication rate. It is a safe and effective method in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Level of evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic study Keywords: Cubital tunnel syndrome, Ulnar nerve, Endoscopic decompression, Minimal invasive