Search

The chr12q24.13 locus encoding OAS1–OAS3 antiviral proteins has been associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) susceptibility. Here, we report genetic, functional and clinical insights into this locus in relation to COVID-19 severity. In our analysis of patients of European (n = 2,249) and African (n = 835) ancestries with hospitalized versus nonhospitalized COVID-19, the risk of hospitalized disease was associated with a common OAS1 haplotype, which was also associated with reduced severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) clearance in a clinical trial with pegIFN-λ1. Bioinformatic analyses and in vitro studies reveal the functional contribution of two associated OAS1 exonic variants comprising the risk haplotype. Derived human-specific alleles rs10774671-A and rs1131454-A decrease OAS1 protein abundance through allele-specific regulation of splicing and nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). We conclude that decreased OAS1 expression due to a common haplotype contributes to COVID-19 severity. Our results provide insight into molecular mechanisms through which early treatment with interferons could accelerate SARS-CoV-2 clearance and mitigate against severe COVID-19.

MEN1, which encodes menin protein, is the most frequently mutated gene in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNEN). Pleiotrophin (PTN) has been reported as a downstream factor of menin that promotes metastasis in different tumor entities. In this study, the effect of menin and its link to PTN were assessed using features of pNEN cells and the outcome of patients with pNEN. The expression levels of menin and PTN in tissues from patients with pNEN were examined using qRT-PCR and western blot and compared with their metastasis status. Functional assays, including transwell migration/invasion and scratch wound-healing assays, were performed on specifically designed CRISPR/Cas9-mediated MEN1-knockout (MEN1-KO) pNEN cell lines (BON1

The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 caused the COVID-19 global pandemic leading to 5.3 million deaths worldwide as of December 2021. The human intestine was found to be a major viral target which could have a strong impact on virus spread and pathogenesis since it is one of the largest organs. While type I interferons (IFNs) are key cytokines acting against systemic virus spread, in the human intestine type III IFNs play a major role by restricting virus infection and dissemination without disturbing homeostasis. Recent studies showed that both type I and III IFNs can inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection, but it is not clear whether one IFN controls SARS-CoV-2 infection of the human intestine better or with a faster kinetics. In this study, we could show that type I and III IFNs both possess antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 in human intestinal epithelial cells (hIECs); however, type III IFN is more potent. Shorter type III IFN pretreatment times and lower concentrations were required to efficiently reduce virus load compared to type I IFNs. Moreover, type III IFNs significantly inhibited SARS-CoV-2 even 4 h postinfection and induced a long-lasting antiviral effect in hIECs. Importantly, the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 to type III IFNs was virus specific since type III IFN did not control VSV infection as efficiently. Together, these results suggest that type III IFNs have a higher potential for IFN-based treatment of SARS-CoV-2 intestinal infection compared to type I IFNs.

Interferon lambdas (IFN{lambda}) (also known as type III IFNs) are critical cytokines that combat infection predominantly at barrier tissues, such as the lung, liver and gastrointestinal tract. Humans have four IFN{lambda}s (1-4) where IFN{lambda}1-3 show [~]80-95% homology and IFN{lambda}4 is the most divergent displaying only [~]30% sequence identity. Variants in IFN{lambda}4 in humans are associated with the outcome of infection, such as with hepatitis C virus. However, how IFN{lambda}4 variants impact cytokine signalling in other tissues and how well this is conserved is largely unknown. In this study we address whether differences in antiviral signalling exist between IFN{lambda}4 variants in human hepatocyte and intestinal cells, comparing them to IFN{lambda}3. We demonstrate that compared to IFN{lambda}3, wild-type human IFN{lambda}4 induces a signalling response with distinct magnitudes and kinetics, which is modified by naturally-occurring variants P70S and K154E in both cell types. IFN{lambda}4s distinct antiviral response was more rapid yet transient compared to IFN{lambda}1 and 3. Additionally, divergent antiviral kinetics were also observed using non-human primate IFN{lambda}s and cell lines. Furthermore, an IFN{lambda}4-like receptor-interacting interface failed to alter IFN{lambda}1s kinetics. Together our data provide further evidence that major functional differences exist within the IFN{lambda} gene family. These results highlight the possible tissue specialisation of IFN{lambda}s and encourage further investigation of the divergent, non-redundant activities of IFN{lambda}4 and other IFN{lambda}s. Contribution to the FieldViral infections remain major causes of death and disease in humans and other animals. Interferons (IFNs) are a diverse group of host signalling proteins that can induce a potent antiviral state in cells and are intimately involved in the outcome of infection. Genetic variants within one IFN (interferon lambda 4, IFN{lambda}4) are associated with the outcome of hepatitis C infection in humans. However, how IFN{lambda}4 functions - and how natural variants affect its activity - remains poorly understood. Comparing how the antiviral activity changes over time following stimulation with different IFN{lambda}s, we identified that IFN{lambda}4 induces a more rapid antiviral state compared to other IFN{lambda}s in liver and intestinal cells. Importantly, this response was conserved within human variants and between humans and non-human primates (chimpanzee and Rhesus macaque). Our results shed light on the unique functions of the divergent IFN{lambda}4 protein.

Intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) are the primary target of enteric viruses. Their infection by viruses leads to the upregulation of both type I and type III interferons (IFNs). These IFNs then act in an autocrine and paracrine manner to protect IECs from viral propagation. To date, whether both IFNs use similar signaling pathways and whether these 2 cytokines can act synergistically to protect against viral infection remain unclear. Using human IECs depleted of either the type I or type III IFN receptor, we found that both signal transduction pathways are interconnected and influence each other at the level of interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression and efficiency of antiviral protection. Precisely, in human IECs, the presence of a functional type III IFN receptor negatively regulates type I IFN signaling and activity, whereas the presence of type I IFN receptor positively reinforces type III IFN signaling and function. We propose that this complex crosstalk allows for a preferential type III IFN-mediated protection of human intestinal cells.

The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 caused the COVID-19 global pandemic leading to 3.5 million deaths worldwide as of June 2021. The human intestine was found to be a major viral target which could have a strong impact on virus spread and pathogenesis since it is one of the largest organs. While type I interferons (IFNs) are key cytokines acting against systemic virus spread, in the human intestine type III IFNs play a major role by restricting virus infection and dissemination without disturbing homeostasis. Recent studies showed that both type I and III IFNs can inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection, but it is not clear if one IFN controls SARS-CoV-2 infection of the human intestine better or with a faster kinetics. In this study, we could show that both type I and III IFNs possess antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 in human intestinal epithelial cells (hIECs), however type III IFN is more potent. Shorter type III IFN pretreatment times and lower concentrations were required to efficiently reduce virus load when compared to type I IFNs. Moreover, type III IFNs significantly inhibited SARS-CoV-2 even 4 hours post-infection and induced a long-lasting antiviral effect in hIECs. Importantly, the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 to type III IFNs was virus-specific since type III IFN did not control VSV infection as efficiently. Together these results suggest that type III IFNs have a higher potential for IFN-based treatment of SARS-CoV-2 intestinal infection as compared to type I IFNs.

Interferons (IFNs) constitute the first line of defense against microbial infections particularly against viruses. They provide antiviral properties to cells by inducing the expression of hundreds of genes known as interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs). The two most important IFNs that can be produced by virtually all cells in the body during intrinsic innate immune response belong to two distinct families: the type I and type III IFNs. The type I IFN receptor is ubiquitously expressed whereas the type III IFN receptor’s expression is limited to epithelial cells and a subset of immune cells. While originally considered to be redundant, type III IFNs have now been shown to play a unique role in protecting mucosal surfaces against pathogen challenges. The mucosal specific functions of type III IFN do not solely rely on the restricted epithelial expression of its receptor but also on the distinct means by which type III IFN mediates its anti-pathogen functions compared to the type I IFN. In this review we first provide a general overview on IFNs and present the similarities and differences in the signal transduction pathways leading to the expression of either type I or type III IFNs. By highlighting the current state-of-knowledge of the two archetypical mucosal surfaces (e.g. the respiratory and intestinal epitheliums), we present the differences in the signaling cascades used by type I and type III IFNs to uniquely induce the expression of ISGs. We then discuss in detail the role of each IFN in controlling pathogen infections in intestinal and respiratory epithelial cells. Finally, we provide our perspective on novel concepts in the field of IFN (stochasticity, response heterogeneity, cellular polarization/differentiation and tissue microenvironment) that we believe have implications in driving the differences between type I and III IFNs and could explain the preferences for type III IFNs at mucosal surfaces.