1. Exercise Blood Pressure in Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction.
- Author
-
Namasivayam M, Lau ES, Zern EK, Schoenike MW, Hardin KM, Sbarbaro JA, Cunningham TF, Farrell RM, Rouvina J, Kowal A, Bhat RR, Brooks LC, Nayor M, Shah RV, Ho JE, Malhotra R, and Lewis GD
- Subjects
- Blood Pressure, Exercise physiology, Exercise Test, Humans, Stroke Volume physiology, Heart Failure
- Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate hemodynamic correlates of inducible blood pressure (BP) pulsatility with exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), to identify relationships to outcomes, and to compare this with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)., Background: In HFpEF, determinants and consequences of exercise BP pulsatility are not well understood., Methods: We measured exercise BP in 146 patients with HFpEF who underwent invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Pulsatile BP was evaluated as proportionate pulse pressure (PrPP), the ratio of pulse pressure to systolic pressure. We measured pulmonary arterial catheter pressures, Fick cardiac output, respiratory gas exchange, and arterial stiffness. We correlated BP changes to central hemodynamics and cardiovascular outcome (nonelective cardiovascular hospitalization) and compared findings with 57 patients with HFrEF from the same referral population., Results: In HFpEF, only age (standardized beta = 0.593; P < 0.001), exercise stroke volume (standardized beta = 0.349; P < 0.001), and baseline arterial stiffness (standardized beta = 0.182; P = 0.02) were significant predictors of peak exercise PrPP in multivariable analysis (R = 0.661). In HFpEF, lower PrPP was associated with lower risk of cardiovascular events, despite adjustment for confounders (HR:0.53 for PrPP below median; 95% CI: 0.28-0.98; P = 0.043). In HFrEF, lower exercise PrPP was not associated with arterial stiffness but was associated with lower peak exercise stroke volume (P = 0.013) and higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (P = 0.004)., Conclusions: In HFpEF, greater inducible BP pulsatility measured using exercise PrPP reflects greater arterial stiffness and higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, in contrast to HFrEF where inducible exercise BP pulsatility relates to stroke volume reserve and favorable outcome., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Namasivayam is supported by a Clinical and Research Fellowship from the Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and is a recipient of the St. Vincent’s Clinic Travelling Fellowship Award. Dr Lewis is supported by the American Heart Association Award 15GPSGC24800006 and by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Awards R01-HL 131029 and R01-HL151841. Dr Nayor is supported by National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute K23-HL138260. Dr Ho is supported by National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute R01-HL134893 and R01-HL140224. Dr Malhotra is supported by Transformation Project Award 18TPA34230025 from the American Heart Association and grant R01-HL142809 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF