Search

With the growth of monoclonal antibodies and other proteins as major modalities in the pharmaceutical industry, there has been an increase in pharmacology and toxicity testing of biotherapeutics in animals. Animals frequently mount an immune response to human therapeutic proteins. This can result in asymptomatic anti-drug antibody formation, immune complexes that affect drug disposition and/or organ function such as kidney, cytokine release responses, fatal hypersensitivity, or a range of reactions in between. In addition, an increasing number of oncology therapeutics are being developed that enhance or directly stimulate immune responses by a variety of mechanisms, which could increase the risk of autoreactivity and an autoimmune-like syndrome in animals and humans. When evaluating the risk of biotherapeutics prior to entering the clinic, the nonclinical safety data may include any of these responses and it is critical to understand whether they represent a safety liability for humans. The DruSafe Leadership group of the IQ Consortium conducted a survey of industry to understand sponsors' experiences with these immune reactions in nonclinical studies related to both immunogenicity and pharmacologically-mediated immune perturbations. The survey covered what pathways were affected, how the immune responses were presented, how the company and health authorities interpreted the data and whether the immune responses were observed in the clinic. Additionally, the survey gathered information on association of these findings with anti-drug antibodies as well as sponsor's use of immunogenicity predictive tools. The data suggests that the ability of a biotherapeutic to activate the immune system, intended or not, plays a significant role on characteristics of the response and whether theys are translatable.

Despite the potential for the chemokine class as therapeutic targets in immune mediated disease, success has been limited. Many chemokines can bind to multiple receptors and many receptors have multiple ligands, with few exceptions. One of those exceptions is CCL20, which exclusively pairs to CCR6 and is associated with several immunologic conditions, thus providing a promising therapeutic target. Following successful evaluation in a single dose, first time in human clinical study, GSK3050002-a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody against human CCL20-was evaluated in a 26-week cynomolgus monkey toxicology study. A high incidence of unexpected vascular and organ inflammation was observed microscopically, leading to the decision to halt clinical development. Here we report a dose-responsive increase in the incidence and severity of inflammation in multiple organs from monkeys receiving 30 and 300 mg/kg/week by either subcutaneous or intravenous injection. Histomorphological changes resembled an immune complex-mediated pathology, which is often due to formation of anti-drug antibodies in monkeys receiving a human protein therapeutic and thus not predictive of clinical outcome. However, the presentation was atypical in that there was a clear dose response with a very high incidence of inflammation with a low incidence of ADA that did not correlate well individually. Additionally, the immunohistologic presentation was atypical in that the severity and distribution of tissue inflammation was greater than the numbers of associated immune complexes (i.e., granular deposits). An extensive ex vivo analysis of large molecular weight protein complexes in monkey serum from this study and in human serum samples demonstrated a time-dependent aggregation of GSK3050002, that was not predicted by in vitro assays. The aggregates also contained complement components. These findings support the hypothesis that immune complexes of drug aggregates, not necessarily including anti-drug antibodies, can fix complement, accumulate over time, and trigger immune complex disease. A situation which may have increased clinical relevance than typical anti-drug antibody-associated immune complex disease in monkeys administered human antibody proteins.

Respiratory tract sensitization can have significant acute and chronic health implications. While induction of respiratory sensitization is widely recognized for some chemicals, validated standard methods or frameworks for identifying and characterizing the hazard are not available. A workshop on assessment of respiratory sensitization was held to discuss the current state of science for identification and characterization of respiratory sensitizer hazard, identify information facilitating development of validated standard methods and frameworks, and consider the regulatory and practical risk management needs. Participants agreed on a predominant Th2 immunological mechanism and several steps in respiratory sensitization. Some overlapping cellular events in respiratory and skin sensitization are well understood, but full mechanism(s) remain unavailable. Progress on non-animal approaches to skin sensitization testing, ranging from in vitro systems, -omics, in silico profiling, and structural profiling were acknowledged. Addressing both induction and elicitation phases remains challenging. Participants identified lack of a unifying dose metric as increasing the difficulty of interpreting dosimetry across exposures. A number of research needs were identified, including an agreed list of respiratory sensitizers and other asthmagens, distinguishing between adverse effects from immune-mediated versus non-immunological mechanisms. A number of themes emerged from the discussion regarding future testing strategies, particularly the need for a tiered framework respiratory sensitizer assessment. These workshop present a basis for moving towards a weight-of-evidence assessment.

Profound immunosuppression (e.g., AIDS, transplant therapy) is epidemiologically associated with an increased cancer risk, and often with oncogenic viruses. It is currently unclear how broadly this association translates to therapeutics that modulate immunity. A workshop co-sponsored by the FDA and HESI examined how perturbing the immune system may contribute to carcinogenesis, and highlighted priorities for improving non-clinical risk assessment of targeted immunomodulatory therapies. Conclusions from the workshop were as follows. 1) While profound altered immunity can promote tumorigenesis, not all components of the immune system are equally important in defense against or promotion of cancer and a similar cancer risk for all immunomodulatory molecules should not be assumed. 2) Rodent carcinogenicity studies have limitations and are generally not reliable predictors of cancer risk associated with immunosuppression. 3) Cancer risk needs to be evaluated based on mechanism-based weight-of-evidence, including data from immune function tests most relevant to tumor immunosurveillance or promotion. 4) Information from nonclinical experiments, clinical epidemiology and immunomodulatory therapeutics show that immunosurveillance involves a complex network of cells and mediators. To support a weight-of-evidence approach, an increased focus on understanding the quantitative relationship between changes in relevant immune function tests and cancer risk is needed.

Summary Objective/Method Aggrecanase activity, most notably ADAMTS-5, is implicated in pathogenic cartilage degradation. Selective monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to both ADAMTS-5 and ADAMTS-4 were generated and in vitro , ex vivo and in vivo systems were utilized to assess target engagement, aggrecanase inhibition and modulation of disease-related endpoints with the intent of selecting a candidate for clinical development in osteoarthritis (OA). Results Structural mapping predicts the most potent mAbs employ a unique mode of inhibition by cross-linking the catalytic and disintegrin domains. In a surgical mouse model of OA, both ADAMTS-5 and ADAMTS-4-specific mAbs penetrate cartilage following systemic administration, demonstrating access to the anticipated site of action. Structural disease modification and associated alleviation of pain-related behavior were observed with ADAMTS-5 mAb treatment. Treatment of human OA cartilage demonstrated a preferential role for ADAMTS-5 inhibition over ADAMTS-4, as measured by ARGS neoepitope release in explant cultures. ADAMTS-5 mAb activity was most evident in a subset of patient-derived tissues and suppression of ARGS neoepitope release was sustained for weeks after a single treatment in human explants and in cynomolgus monkeys, consistent with high affinity target engagement and slow ADAMTS-5 turnover. Conclusion This data supports a hypothesis set forth from knockout mouse studies that ADAMTS-5 is the major aggrecanase involved in cartilage degradation and provides a link between a biological pathway and pharmacology which translates to human tissues, non-human primate models and points to a target OA patient population. Therefore, a humanized ADAMTS-5-selective monoclonal antibody (GSK2394002) was progressed as a potential OA disease modifying therapeutic.

The market for biotherapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is large and is growing rapidly. However, attrition poses a significant challenge for the development of mAbs, and for biopharmaceuticals in general, with large associated costs in resource and animal use. Termination of candidate mAbs may occur due to poor translation from preclinical models to human safety. It is critical that the industry addresses this problem to maintain productivity. Though attrition poses a significant challenge for pharmaceuticals in general, there are specific challenges related to the development of antibody-based products. Due to species specificity, non-human primates (NHP) are frequently the only pharmacologically relevant species for nonclinical safety and toxicology testing for the majority of antibody-based products, and therefore, as more mAbs are developed, increased NHP use is anticipated. The integration of new and emerging in vitro and in silico technologies, e.g., cell- and tissue-based approaches, systems pharmacology and modeling, have the potential to improve the human safety prediction and the therapeutic mAb development process, while reducing and refining animal use simultaneously. In 2014, to engage in open discussion about the challenges and opportunities for the future of mAb development, a workshop was held with over 60 regulators and experts in drug development, mechanistic toxicology and emerging technologies to discuss this issue. The workshop used industry case-studies to discuss the value of the in vivo studies and identify opportunities for in vitro technologies in human safety assessment. From these and continuing discussions it is clear that there are opportunities to improve safety assessment in mAb development using non-animal technologies, potentially reducing future attrition, and there is a shared desire to reduce animal use through minimised study design and reduced numbers of studies.

An evaluation of potential antibody formation to biologic therapeutics during the course of nonclinical safety studies and its impact on the toxicity profile is expected under current regulatory guidance and is accepted standard practice. However, approaches for incorporating this information in the interpretation of nonclinical safety studies are not clearly established. Described here are the immunological basis of anti-drug antibody formation to biopharmaceuticals (immunogenicity) in laboratory animals, and approaches for generating and interpreting immunogenicity data from nonclinical safety studies of biotechnology-derived therapeutics to support their progression to clinical evaluation. We subscribe that immunogenicity testing strategies should be adapted to the specific needs of each therapeutic development program, and data generated from such analyses should be integrated with available clinical and anatomic pathology, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic data to properly interpret nonclinical studies.

Ionic signaling pathways, including voltage-dependent potassium (Kv) channels, are instrumental in antigen-mediated responses of peripheral T cells. However, how Kv channels cooperate with other signaling pathways involved in T cell activation and differentiation is unknown. We report that multiple Kv channels are expressed by naive CD4+ lymphocytes, and that the current amplitude and kinetics are modulated by antigen receptor–mediated stimulation and costimulatory signals. Currents expressed in naive CD4+ lymphocytes are consistent with Kv1.1, Kv1.2, Kv1.3, and Kv1.6. Effector CD4+ cells generated by optimal TCR and costimulation exhibit only Kv1.3 current, but at approximately sixfold higher levels than naive cells. CD4+ lymphocytes anergized through partial stimulation exhibit similar Kv1.1, Kv1.2, and/or Kv1.6 currents, but approximately threefold more Kv1.3 current than naive cells. To determine if Kv channels contribute to the distinct functions of naive, effector, and anergized T cells, we tested their role in immunoregulatory cytokine production. Each Kv channel is required for maximal IL-2 production by naive CD4+ lymphocytes, whereas none appears to play a role in IL-2, IL-4, or IFN-γ production by effector cells. Interestingly, Kv channels in anergized lymphocytes actively suppress IL-4 production, and these functions are consistent with a role in regulating the membrane potential and calcium signaling.

Interleukin (IL)-18 has profound antitumor activity when administered at high doses as a single agent for prolonged periods in BALB/c mice bearing late, well-established MOPC-315 tumors. Management with a qD x 27 schedule resulted in regression of tumors in all animals receiving 5 mg/kg/d. A protracted daily management regimen appears to be necessary to induce regression in this advanced tumor model. Biologic markers were assessed and appear to be potentially useful in evaluating the immunologic and antitumor activity of IL-18. The biomarkers of IL-18's immunologic activity include, but are not limited to, IL-1alpha, IL-2, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, interferon-gamma, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. The profile of these circulating cytokines and their expression levels at baseline, and after IL-18 delivery, can be measured in the serum, as well as from splenocytes of mice or human peripheral blood mononuclear cells derived from either normal subjects or patients with cancer. We compared IL-18 and IL-12 alone or in combination for their ability to induce cytokine production and natural killer cytolytic activity. Our data support the notion that IL-18 induces a predominantly Th1 response, and that the mechanism of IL-18 activity differs from that of IL-12. The biologic activity of IL-18 management revealed by increases in serum levels of cytokines and enhancement of natural killer cytolytic activity will be useful as clinical trials initiate in 2002. Expression of interferon-gamma and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor serum levels correlates directly over a broad dose escalation with the level of IL-18. Therefore, this provides a convenient pharmacodynamic reference to the biologic response to IL-18 that may serve to guide the conduct of clinical trials.

Anti-CD4 antibodies, which cause CD4+T-cell depletion, have been shown to increase susceptibility to infections in mice. Thus, development of anti-CD4 antibodies for clinical use raises potential concerns about suppression of host defense mechanisms against pathogens and tumors. The anti-human CD4 antibody keliximab, which binds only human and chimpanzee CD4, has been evaluated in host defense models using murine CD4 knockout-human CD4 transgenic (HuCD4/Tg) mice. In these mice, depletion of CD4+T cells by keliximab was associated with inhibition of anti-Pneumocystis cariniiand anti-Candida albicansantibody responses and rendered HuCD4/Tg mice susceptible toP. carinii, a CD4-dependent pathogen, but did not compromise host defense againstC. albicansinfection. Treatment of HuCD4/Tg mice with corticosteroids impaired host immune responses and decreased survival for both infections. Resistance to experimental B16 melanoma metastases was not affected by treatment with keliximab, in contrast to an increase in tumor colonization caused by anti-T cell Thy1.2 and anti-asialo GM-1 antibodies. These data suggest an immunomodulatory rather than an overt immunosuppressive activity of keliximab. This was further demonstrated by the differential effect of keliximab on type 1 and type 2 cytokine expression in splenocytes stimulated ex vivo. Keliximab caused an initial up-regulation of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and gamma interferon, followed by transient down-regulation of IL-4 and IL-10. Taken together, the effects of keliximab in HuCD4/Tg mice suggest that in addition to depleting circulating CD4+T lymphocytes, keliximab has the capability of modulating the function of the remaining cells without causing general immunosuppression. Therefore, keliximab therapy may be beneficial in controlling certain autoimmune diseases.

Although immunoglobulin G and free light (L) chains of oligoclonal origin in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are the most common immunologic abnormalities in multiple sclerosis (MS), it is unknown whether homologous CSF L chain sequences are present in different individuals with MS. Using Southern blotting, a particular kappa (kappa) L chain variable region (V) probe was recently found to hybridize to Vkappa cDNA from CSF B cells from almost one half of the MS patients tested but only 10% of normal or other neurologic disease controls [Zhou, S.-R., Maier, C.C., Mitchell, G.W., LaGanke, C.C., Blalock, J.E., Whitaker, J.N., 1998. A cross-reactive idiotope in cerebrospinal fluid cells in multiple sclerosis: further evidence for the role of myelin basic protein. Neurology 50, 411-417.] Here, we report that this likely results from remarkable sequence similarity in certain Vkappa from CSF B cells from different individuals with MS. The high degree of sequence homology even extended to all three complementarity determining regions (CDR) which in part form an antibody combining site. In addition, marked sequence homology was observed between the light chains from the MS patients and those from certain mouse antibodies against myelin basic protein (MBP). The results establish, in principle, that the same or very similar kappa light chain variable regions can be shared between CSF B lymphocytes from different individuals with MS as well as with certain antibodies against MBP.

Alveolar macrophage (AM) responses are commonly induced in inhalation toxicology studies, typically being observed as an increase in number or a vacuolated ‘foamy’ morphology. Discriminating between adaptive AM responses and adverse events during nonclinical and clinical development is a major scientific challenge. When measuring and interpreting induced AM responses, an understanding of macrophage biology is essential; this includes ‘sub-types’ of AMs with different roles in health and disease and mechanisms of induction/resolution of AM responses to inhalation of pharmaceutical aerosols. In this context, emerging assay techniques, the utility of toxicokinetics and the requirement for new biomarkers are considered. Risk assessment for nonclinical toxicology findings and their translation to effects in humans is discussed from a scientific and regulatory perspective. At present, when apparently adaptive macrophage-only responses to inhaled investigational products are observed in nonclinical studies, this poses a challenge for risk assessment and an improved understanding of induced AM responses to inhaled pharmaceuticals is required.

HIV-1 integrase inhibitors (INIs) are a promising class of antiretrovirals for the treatment of HIV in adults; there is interest in expanding their use into pediatric populations. A theoretical concern for developmental immunotoxicity was raised after a publication suggested that two HIV INI tool compounds inhibited in vitro cleavage activity of recombination activating genes 1 and 2 (RAG1/2) through the inhibition of their binding to recombination signal sequences. RAG1/2 are required for the development of mature B and T lymphocyte populations. The potential effects of the investigational INI dolutegravir on RAG1/2 were addressed by developing assays in juvenile rats to measure T cell receptor (TCR) Vβ usage by flow cytometry as an indicator of TCR repertoire diversity and a T cell dependent antibody response (TDAR) as an indicator of immunosuppression. These endpoints were incorporated into a juvenile rat toxicity study, along with immunophenotyping, hematology, and histopathology of immunologic organs. Dose levels of 0, 0.5, 2, or 75mg/kg/day dolutegravir were given via oral gavage from postnatal day 4 through 66. At the highest dose, there was decreased body weight gain and two preweanling deaths; however, there were no treatment-related effects on developmental parameters. There were no effects on immunologic competence, as measured by TDAR, and no effects on lymphocyte subsets or CD4 and CD8 TCR Vβ usage in peripheral blood. Histopathology of immunologic organs (spleen, thymus, lymph nodes) and hematology evaluation revealed no effects. The no observed adverse effect level for immunotoxicity endpoints was 75mg/kg/day.

Recombinant human interleukin (IL)-18 (rHuIL-18) has a potential as a therapeutic agent in cancer and is currently in drug development. Since human IL-18 displays 96% and 100% amino acid sequence homology with cynomolgus monkey and chimpanzee IL-18, respectively, the biological responses to rHuIL-18 were evaluated in these species. A single intravenous dose of rHuIL-18 at 1 or 10 mg/kg in cymonolgus monkeys caused a transient reduction in lymphocyte counts, induction of IL-1α and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) mRNA in whole blood cells and a marked increase in plasma neopterin. rHuIL-18 administered to cynomolgus monkeys at doses of 0.3 or 3 mg/kg for two 5-day cycles (Days 1–5 and 15–19) resulted in increased monocyte counts, induction of NK cells and concomitant increases in plasma IL-12 and neopterin. Administration of repeat doses of rHuIL-18 at 10 mg/kg to chimpanzees was associated with increased monocyte counts, upregulation of FcγRI surface expression on monocytes, and increased IL-8, IL-12 and neopterin in plasma. These studies demonstrate, for the first time, the immunostimulatory activity of rHuIL-18 in vivo. The described pharmacological profile of rHuIL-18 in both cynomolgus monkeys and chimpanzees is indicative of the immunotherapeutic potential of rHuIL-18 in the treatment of cancer.