Search

Optic Atrophy (OA) can be associated with the development of microcystic macular edema (MME) in the perifoveal retinal inner nuclear layer (INL). We aimed here to retrospectively determine the prevalence of MME in patients with non-glaucomatous OA in our tertiary ophthalmology department between 2015 and 2020. We then examined how MME affected the thicknesses of the different retinal layers and the differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between those patients who developed MME and those who did not. A total of 643 eyes (429 patients) were included (mean age 45.9 ± 17.8 years, 52% female). MME developed in 95 (15%) eyes and across all etiologies of OA except for toxic/nutritional causes, but the prevalence of MME varied between the different etiologies. The development of MME was associated with thinning of the ganglion cell layer (11.0 vs. 9.6 μm; p = 0.001) and the retinal nerve fiber layer (10.1 vs. 9.15 μm; p = 0.024), with INL thickening in the 3- and 6-mm diameter areas of the central fovea. Patients developing MME had significantly worse distance best-corrected visual acuity than those not developing MME (0.62 vs. 0.38 logMAR; p = 0.002). Overall, the presence of MME in OA cannot be used to guide the diagnostic work-up of OA.

Background: Epidemiologic studies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) have focused on the first waves of the pandemic until early 2021., Objectives: We aimed to extend these data from the onset of the pandemic to the global coverage by vaccination in summer 2022., Methods: This retrospective, multicenter observational study analyzed COVISEP registry data on reported COVID-19 cases in pwMS between January 2020 and July 2022. Severe COVID-19 was defined as hospitalization or higher severity., Results: Among 2584 pwMS with confirmed/highly suspected COVID-19, severe infection rates declined from 14.6% preomicron wave to 5.7% during omicron wave ( p  < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [1.25-1.64] per 10 years), male sex (OR = 2.01, 95% CI = [1.51-2.67]), obesity (OR = 2.36, 95% CI = [1.52-3.68]), cardiac comorbidities (OR = 2.36, 95% CI = [1.46-3.83]), higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores (OR = 2.09, 95% CI = [1.43-3.06] for EDSS 3-5.5 and OR = 4.53, 95% CI = [3.04-6.75] for EDSS ⩾6), and anti-CD20 therapies (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = [1.85-3.87]) as risk factors for COVID-19 severity. Vaccinated individuals experienced less severe COVID-19, whether on (risk ratio (RR) = 0.64, 95% CI = [0.60-0.69]) or off (RR = 0.32, 95% CI = [0.30-0.33]) anti-CD20., Discussion: In pwMS, consistent risk factors were anti-CD20 therapies and neurological disability, emerging as vital drivers of COVID-19 severity regardless of wave, period, or vaccination status., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: L.J. reports no disclosure. E.J. reports no disclosure. P.L. reports no disclosure. E.M. has received research support from Fondation ARSEP and Biogen Idec, travel funding and/or consulting fees from Alexion, Biogen Idec, BMS, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. J.D.S. reports no disclosure. H.Z. has no disclosure related to this manuscript. Unrelated to this manuscript H.Z. received consulting fees from Biogen Idec, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Horizon Therpaeutics, Alexion, BMS, and Grant Research Support from ROCHE. J.P. reports no disclosure. P.K. reports no disclosure. D.B. reports no disclosure. O.H. has received consulting and lecture fees from Bayer Schering, Merck, Teva, Genzyme, Novartis, Almirall, and Biogen Idec, travel grants from Novartis, Teva, Genzyme, Merck Serono, and Biogen Idec, and research support from Roche, Merck, and Novartis. L.G. has received consulting and/or lecture fees and/or travel funding from Novartis, Merck, Sanofi, BMS, and Biogen. C.B. has received consulting honoraria from Alexion, Sanofi, Merck, Biogen, BMS, Novartis, Roche, and Teva. M.T. reports receiving consulting and lecture fees from Merck, Novartis, and Biogen Idec, travel grants from Sanofi, Merck Serono, and Biogen Idec. S.V. has received lecturing fees, travel grants, and research support from Biogen, BMS-Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. O.C. reports receiving personal fees from Biogen, Roche, Merck, Novartis, Janssen, and Sanofi and nonfinancial support from Roche, Merck, and Novartis outside the submitted work. A.M. reports no disclosure. D.L. reports receiving grants from Roche, Sanofi, the ARSEP Foundation, the EDMUS Foundation, and the National Agency of Research and receiving personal fees from Biogen, Novartis, Alexion, Merck, and MSD outside the submitted work. E.B. has received honoraria and consulting fees from Alexion, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck, Roche, and Teva. C.L-F. reports no disclosure. B.B. serves on scientific advisory board, has received funding for travel and honoraria from Alexion, Biogen, BMS, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Roche, and Teva. P.B. reports receiving personal fees from Novartis, Biogen, Merck, BMS, Alexion, and Sanofi outside the submitted work. B.S. reports research support from Roche, Sanofi, and Merck and personal fees for lectures or advisory boards from Novartis, Sanofi, Biogen, Janssen, and Merck. P.C. reports receiving personal fees for board participation from Janssen and Novartis and for board participation and travel from Sanofi and Merck outside the submitted work. E.T. reports receiving personal fees from Biogen, BMS, Janssen, Horizon, Merck, Novartis, and Sanofi outside the submitted work. E.M. reports no disclosure. T.M. reports receiving travel grants and fees for advisory boards from Biogen, Roche, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva outside the submitted work. F.S. reports receiving consulting and/or lecture fees and/or travel funding from Novartis-Pharma, Biogen, Roche, Sanofi, Linde, and LVL. M.Z. reports receiving expert testimony from Alexion and Novartis, and travel grants from Merck, Roche, and Sanofi Aventis France. C.P. reports receiving honoraria and consulting fees from Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Horizon, and Roche outside the submitted work and serving as president of the Francophone Multiple Sclerosis Society from 2021 to 2024. C.L. has received consulting or travel fees from Biogen, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Teva, and Merck Serono, and research grant from Biogen.

Recent studies in adults suggested that extended-interval dosing of rituximab/ocrelizumab (RTX/OCR) larger than 12 months was safe and could improve safety. This was an observational cohort study of very active pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (PoMS) (median (range) age, 16 (12-17) years) treated with RTX/OCR with 6 month standard-interval dosing ( n = 9) or early extended-interval dosing ( n = 12, median (range) interval 18 months (12-25)). Within a median (range) follow-up of 31 (12-63) months after RTX/OCR onset, one patient (standard-interval) experienced relapse and no patient showed disability worsening or new T2-weighted lesions. This study suggests that the effectiveness of RTX/OCR is maintained with a median extended-interval dosing of 18 months in patients with very active PoMS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

We conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study in a French University Hospital between 2010 and 2018 to describe the risk of severe infectious event (SIE) within 2 years after the date of first rituximab infusion (T0) prescribed after the evidence of acquired hypogammaglobulinemia (gamma globulins [GG] ≤ 6 g/L) in the setting of autoimmune diseases (AID) other than rheumatoid arthritis. SIE occurred in 26 out of 121 included patients. Two years cumulative incidence rates were 12.7 % (95 % CI 5.1-23.9) in the multiple sclerosis/neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder group (n = 48), 27.6 % (95 % CI 15.7-40.9) in the ANCA-associated vasculitis group (n = 48) and 30.6 % (95 % CI 13.1-50.3) in the 'other AID' group (n = 25). Median GG level at T0 was 5.3 g/l (IQR 4.1-5.6) in the 'SIE' group and 5.6 g/l (IQR 4.7-5.8) in the 'no SIE' group (p = 0.04). In regression analysis, risk of SIE increased with Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 (OR 2.77; 95 % CI 1.01-7.57), lung disease (OR 3.20; 95 % CI 1.27-7.99), GG < 4 g/L (OR 3.39; 95 % CI 1.02-11.19), concomitant corticosteroid therapy (OR 4.13; 95 % CI 1.63-10.44), previous cyclophosphamide exposure (OR 2.69; 95 % CI 1.10-6.61), a lymphocyte count < 1000 cells/µL (OR 2.86; 95 % CI 1.12-7.21) and absence of pneumococcal vaccination (OR 3.50; 95 % CI 1.41-8.70). These results may help to inform clinical decision when considering a treatment by rituximab in immunosuppressed AID patients with hypogammaglobulinemia., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Importance: In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), factors associated with severe COVID-19 include anti-CD20 therapies and neurologic disability, but it is still unclear whether these 2 variables are independently associated with severe COVID-19 or whether the association depends on MS clinical course., Objective: To assess the association between anti-CD20 therapies and COVID-19 severity in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and progressive MS (PMS)., Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study used data from the COVISEP study, which included patients with MS and COVID-19 from February 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022, at 46 French MS expert centers, general hospitals, and private neurology practices. Eligible patients with RRMS were those treated with high-efficacy MS therapy (ie, anti-CD20, fingolimod, or natalizumab), and eligible patients with PMS were those younger than 70 years with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 8 or lower. Patients were monitored from COVID-19 symptom onset until recovery or death., Exposures: Current anti-CD20 therapy (ocrelizumab or rituximab)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was severe COVID-19 (ie, hospitalization with any mode of oxygenation or death). All analyses were conducted separately in patients with RRMS and PMS using propensity score-weighted logistic regression. Subgroup analyses were performed according to COVID-19 vaccine status, sex, EDSS score, and age., Results: A total of 1400 patients, 971 with RRMS (median age, 39.14 years [IQR, 31.38-46.80 years]; 737 [76.1%] female) and 429 with PMS (median age, 54.21 years [IQR, 48.42-60.14 years]; 250 [58.3%] female) were included in the study. A total of 418 patients with RRMS (43.0%) and 226 with PMS (52.7%) were treated with anti-CD20 therapies. In weighted analysis, 13.4% and 2.9% of patients with RRMS treated and not treated with anti-CD20 had severe COVID-19, respectively, and anti-CD20 treatment was associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR], 5.20; 95% CI, 2.78-9.71); this association persisted among vaccinated patients (7.0% vs 0.9%; OR, 8.85; 95% CI, 1.26-62.12). Among patients with PMS, 19.0% and 15.5% of patients treated and not treated with anti-CD20 had severe COVID-19, respectively, and there was no association between anti-CD20 treatment and severe COVID-19 (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.76-2.16). In PMS subgroup analysis, anti-CD20 exposure interacted negatively with EDSS score (P = .009 for interaction) and age (P = .03 for interaction); anti-CD20 therapies were associated with risk of severe COVID-19 only in patients with less neurologic disability and younger patients with PMS., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, risk of severe COVID-19 was higher in patients with PMS than in those with RRMS. Use of anti-CD20 therapies was associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19 among patients with RRMS. In patients with PMS, there was no association between anti-CD20 therapies and risk of severe COVID-19.

Introduction: Natalizumab, a therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), is associated with a risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Over the last several years, practitioners have used off-label extended interval dosing (EID) of natalizumab to reduce PML risk, despite the absence of a large-scale efficacy evaluation., Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study among adults with RRMS receiving stable standard interval dosing (SID), defined as a ≥ 12-month consecutive period of ≥ 11 natalizumab infusions/year in France. We compared the 12-month risk difference of remaining relapse-free (primary endpoint) between patients who switched to EID (≤ 9 natalizumab infusions) and those who remained on SID, with a noninferiority margin of - 11%. We used propensity score methods such as inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Secondary endpoints were annualized relapse rate, disease progression, and safety., Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between patients receiving EID (n = 147) and SID (n = 156). The proportion of relapse-free patients 12 months postbaseline was 142/147 in the EID (96.6%) and 144/156 in the SID group (92.3%); risk difference (95% CI) 4.3% (- 1.3 to 9.8%); p < 0.001 for non-inferiority. There were no significant differences between relapse rates (0.043 vs. 0.083 per year, respectively; p = 0.14) or Expanded Disability Status Scale mean scores (2.43 vs. 2.72, respectively; p = 0.18); anti-JC virus index values were similar (p = 0.23); and no instances of PML were reported. The comparisons using IPTW (n = 306) and PSM (n = 204) were consistent., Conclusion: These results support the pertinence of using an EID strategy for RRMS patients treated with natalizumab., Clinical Trials: gov identifier (NCT04580381)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The immune system plays a significant role in multiple sclerosis. While MS was historically thought to be T cell-mediated, multiple pieces of evidence now support the view that B cells are essential players in multiple sclerosis pathogenic processes. High-efficacy disease-modifying therapies that target the immune system have emerged over the past two decades. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies selectively deplete CD20+ B and CD20+ T cells and efficiently suppress inflammatory disease activity. These monotherapies prevent relapses, reduce new or active magnetic resonance imaging brain lesions, and lessen disability progression in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Rituximab, ocrelizumab, and ofatumumab are currently used in clinical practice, while phase III clinical trials for ublituximab have been recently completed. In this review, we compare the four anti-CD20 antibodies in terms of their mechanisms of action, routes of administration, immunological targets, and pharmacokinetic properties. A deeper understanding of the individual properties of these molecules in relation to their efficacy and safety profiles is critical for their use in clinical practice., Competing Interests: JS has received fees for serving on scientific advisory boards andconsulting, and research support from Novartis and Roche. EM has received research support from Fondation ARSEP and Biogen Idec, travel funding and/or consulting fees from Alexion, Biogen Idec, BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. AG has received personal compensation for consulting, lecturing and congress participation from Novartis, Alexon, AEI/Roche andNovartis. DL has received fees for board membership and consultancy and grants from Alexion, Actelion, BMS, Biogen,Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Teva. LM has received consulting fees from Biogen, Novartis Pharma, Teva, BMS, Roche,Sanofi-Genzyme and Janssen Cilag. ET has received honoraria, travel grants, or research grants from the following pharmaceutical companies: Actelion, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Teva. HZ has received personal fees from Novartisrelated to this work and consulting fees from Biogen, Roche,Alexion, Roche, BMS, Novartis and Merck, unrelated to this work. DB has received personal compensation for consulting,serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities with Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Celgene-BMS and Alexion. RL has received consultancy and speaker honoraria from Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono,Novartis, Orion and GSK, and research grants from GSK, Population Bio and Roche. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 de Sèze, Maillart, Gueguen, Laplaud, Michel, Thouvenot, Zephir, Zimmer, Biotti and Liblau.)

Background: Rituximab (RTX) is largely used as a long-term maintenance therapy in various inflammatory neurological diseases. Reducing the dose of maintenance therapy of RTX from 2 grams every 6 months (traditional regimen) to 1 gram every 6 months (reduced regimen) is a widely applied practice, with the assumption that it decreases the risk of side effects while maintaining efficacy., Methods: In order to better describe the biological consequences of this strategy, we retrospectively compared, in a single center, the B-cell count after the traditional regimen and after the reduced regimen in patients who underwent both (n = 161)., Results: The rate of patients with B-cell repopulation was not significantly different between traditional and reduced regimens (9.9% vs 15.6%, p = 0.18). Among the 145 patients who did not have B-cell repopulation following the traditional regimen, B-cell repopulation following the reduced regimen occurred in only 16 cases (11.0%) and was usually slight: 11/16 patients had only 1% of CD19+ cells., Conclusion: These data emphasize the relevance of 1 g of RTX as maintenance therapy and the fact that 2 g of RTX is generally an overtreatment in inflammatory neurological diseases., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflict of interest in relation with this work., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In 2020, the French Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Society (SFSEP) decided to develop a national evidence-based consensus on pregnancy in MS. As neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) shares a series of commonalities with MS, but also some significant differences, specific recommendations had to be developed., Objectives: To establish recommendations on pregnancy in women with NMOSD., Methods: The French Group for Recommendations in Multiple Sclerosis (France4MS) reviewed PubMed and universities databases (January 1975 through June 2021). The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, which was developed to synthesise the scientific literature and expert opinions on health care topics, was used to reach a formal agreement. Fifty-six MS experts worked on the full-text review and initial wording of recommendations. A sub-group of nine NMOSD experts was dedicated to analysing available data on NMOSD. A group of 62 multidisciplinary healthcare specialists validated the final proposal of summarised evidence., Results: A strong agreement was reached for all 66 proposed recommendations. They cover diverse topics, such as pregnancy planning, follow-up during pregnancy and postpartum, delivery routes, loco-regional analgesia or anaesthesia, prevention of postpartum relapses, breastfeeding, vaccinations, reproductive assistance, management of relapses, and disease-modifying treatments., Conclusion: Physicians and patients should be aware of the new and specific evidence-based recommendations of the French MS Society for pregnancy in women with NMOSD. They should help harmonise counselling and treatment practise, allowing for better individualised choices.

Objective: The objective of this study was to develop evidence-based recommendations on pregnancy management for persons with multiple sclerosis (MS)., Background: MS typically affects young women in their childbearing years. Increasing evidence is available to inform questions raised by MS patients and health professionals about pregnancy issues., Methods: The French Group for Recommendations in Multiple Sclerosis (France4MS) reviewed PubMed and university databases (January 1975 through June 2021). The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was developed to synthesise the scientific literature and expert opinions on healthcare topics; it was used to reach a formal agreement. Fifty-six MS experts worked on the full-text review and initial wording of recommendations. A group of 62 multidisciplinary healthcare specialists validated the final proposal of summarised evidence., Results: A strong agreement was reached for all 104 proposed recommendations. They cover diverse topics, such as pregnancy planning, follow-up during pregnancy and postpartum, delivery routes, locoregional analgesia or anaesthesia, prevention of postpartum relapses, breastfeeding, vaccinations, reproductive assistance, management of relapses and disease-modifying treatments., Conclusion: The 2022 recommendations of the French MS society should be helpful to harmonise counselling and treatment practice for pregnancy in persons with MS, allowing for better and individualised choices.

There is no consensus regarding the classification of optic neuritis, and precise diagnostic criteria are not available. This reality means that the diagnosis of disorders that have optic neuritis as the first manifestation can be challenging. Accurate diagnosis of optic neuritis at presentation can facilitate the timely treatment of individuals with multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease. Epidemiological data show that, cumulatively, optic neuritis is most frequently caused by many conditions other than multiple sclerosis. Worldwide, the cause and management of optic neuritis varies with geographical location, treatment availability, and ethnic background. We have developed diagnostic criteria for optic neuritis and a classification of optic neuritis subgroups. Our diagnostic criteria are based on clinical features that permit a diagnosis of possible optic neuritis; further paraclinical tests, utilising brain, orbital, and retinal imaging, together with antibody and other protein biomarker data, can lead to a diagnosis of definite optic neuritis. Paraclinical tests can also be applied retrospectively on stored samples and historical brain or retinal scans, which will be useful for future validation studies. Our criteria have the potential to reduce the risk of misdiagnosis, provide information on optic neuritis disease course that can guide future treatment trial design, and enable physicians to judge the likelihood of a need for long-term pharmacological management, which might differ according to optic neuritis subgroups., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AP received grant support for remyelination trials in multiple sclerosis to the Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Department of Neurology, MS Centre (RESTORE trial), and UCL, London RECOVER trial; received grant fees from Fight for Sight (nimodipine in optic neuritis trial); received royalties or licenses from Up-to-Date (Wolters Kluwer) for a book chapter; received speaker fees for the Heidelberg Academy; participates on advisory board for SC Zeiss OCTA Angi-Network, and the SC Novartis OCTiMS study; holds leadership roles for governing board IMSVISUAL; was chairman of ERN-EYE Neuro-ophthalmology (until Oct, 2020); is board member of National Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Association; received equipment from OCTA from Zeiss (Plex Elite); and received medical writing support from Novartis for a manuscript (https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51473). CF received consulting fees from Invex Therapeutics; received speaker honoraria from University of Dunedin; and holds leadership as Director of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. VB received personal fees as consultant for Gensight and Neurophoenix. PC obtained grants from Annexon, Biogen, Genentech; received royalties from Cambridge Press for an OCT book; received consulting fees from Disarm Therapeutics, Nervgen, Biogen, Avidea; received honoraria from NY Academy of Sciences; and received equipment from Myelin Repair Foundation, Academic CME, Neuraly, and Landos. FC received speaker honoraria from Alexion, Accure Therapeutics, and the Sumiara Foundation. RDe obtained consulting fees from Alexion. JdS received consulting fees from Biogen, Teva, BMS Celegen, Roche, Novartis, Janssen, Merck, Alexion, CSL Behring; and honoraria from Biogen, Teva, BMS Celegen, Roche, Novartis, Janssen, Merck, Alexion, and CSL Behring. JFR received consulting fees from Roche, and Sanofi. EF holds honoraria from Alexion, Genzyme, Biogen, Novartis, and Janssen. TF holds honoraria from Alexion. CFT received honoraria from Novartis; and received support for attending meetings and travel from Novartis and Teva. KF obtained grants from Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of Japan as well as the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Labor of Japan; received consulting fees from Alexion Chugai-Roche Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Biogen, Eisai, Takeda, Teijin, Viela Bio, UCB, Merck, Japan Tobacco Pharma, and Abbvie; received honoraria from Alexion, Chugai-Roche, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Biogen, Eisai, Takeda, Asahi Kasei Medical, Teijin, and Bayer; participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Alexion, Chugai, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Biogen, Eisai, Takeda, Asahi Kasei Medical, Teijin, UCB, and Viela Bio; and received medical writing support from Oxford PharmaGenesis and Apothecom. RG acquired personal fees for participation on data safety monitoring boards, and served on the advisory boards for Biogen, Hikma, Merck, Roche, and Sanofi as well as receiving a grant from Roche. FG received grants or contracts from Roche (NMO epidemiologic studies) and Novartis (MS epidemiologic studies); received honoraria from for lectures from Roche, Novartis, Stendhal, and Merck; received support for attending meetings from the European Charcot Foundation, and ECTRIMS; and reports leadership of FOCEM (Foro Centroamericano y del Caribe de la Esclerosis Múltiple y otras enfermedades desmielinizantes del Sistema Nervioso Central) and Academia Panameña de Medicina y Cirugía (both unpaid). MHab obtained honoraria from Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck, Bayer, Novartis, Pliva-Teva, Roche, and Zentiva; received support for attending meetings from Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck, Bayer, Novartis, Pliva-Teva, and Roche; and participated on advisory board for Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck, Bayer, Novartis, Pliva-Teva, and Roche. ZIl obtained grants or contracts from Biogen and Alexion; received honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Roche, Merck, and Alexion; received payment for expert testimony from Roche; received support for attending meetings and travel from Biogen and Sanofi; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi, Roche, and Alexion. HJK received grants or contracts from National Research Foundation of Korea, Aprilbio, and Eisai; received consulting fees from Aprilbio, Daewoong, HanAll BioPharma, MDimune, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva-Handok, UCB, and Viela Bio; and received honoraria from Alexion, Biogen, Celltrion, Eisai, GC Pharma, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva-Handok. RM received consulting fees from UCB, Alexion, Merck, Viela Bio, Novartis, and Roche; and participated on an advisory board for Viela Bio and Roche. FP obtained research support from Alexion; received grants or contracts from German Ministry for Research Support Recipient Charité Education and Research (BMBF), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Einstein Foundation, Guthy Jackson Charitable Foundation, EU FP7 Framework Program, Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Serono, Novartis, Bayer, Roche, Parexel, and Almirall; received honoraria from the Guthy Jackson Foundation, Bayer, Biogen, Merck Serono, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, Viela Bio, Roche, UCB, Mitsubishi Tanabe, and Celgene; received support for attending meetings from Guthy Jackson Foundation, Bayer, Biogen, Merck Serono, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, Alexion, Viela Bio, Roche, UCB, Mitsubishi Tanabe, and Celgene; participated on an advisory board for Celgene, Roche, UCB, Merck; and reports leadership as academic editor for Plos One, and associate editor for Neurology, Neuroimmunology, and Neuroinflammation. MBR received support for attending meeting from Novartis. BSD received consulting fees from Chiesi; received honoraria from Chiesi and Sanofi; received support for attending meetings from Bausch + Lomb; participated on an advisory board for Chiesi; and has stock options from Accure Therapeutics. DS received grants or contracts from National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), American Academy of Neurology (AAN), National Institute of Aging (NIA), National Multiple Sclerosis Society (NMSS), and United States Department of State; and was a committee member for Multiple Sclerosis International Federation (MSIF) and American Neurological Association (ANA). AS received grants or contracts from the Turkish MS society, and Istanbul University Research Support Grants; received consulting fees from Roche, Merck Serono, Biogen, Gen Pharma of Türkiye, Sanofi Genzyme, and Novartis; received honoraria from Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, Roche, and Teva; and received support for attending meetings from Sanofi Genzyme. VvP obtained grants or contracts from Biogen; received consulting fees from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, Almirall, and Roche; received honoraria from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi, BMS, Novartis, Roche; and received support for attending meetings from Biogen, Roche, and Almirall. MPW received royalties from Springer Healthcare and Elsevier; received consulting fees from Biogen, Roche, Biologix, Novartis, BMS-Celgene, Imcyse, Merck Serono, Sanofi Aventis, IXICO, and Icometrix; received honoraria from Bayer, Biogen, Biologix, Genilac, Novartis, Medison, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, and BMS-Celgene; and participated on a data safety monitoring board for VU University Medical Center. LB received consulting fees as editor for the Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology. GTP is an Emeritus editor for Neuro-ophthalmology. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Disease modifying therapies compromise immune response to SARS-Cov2 or its vaccine in patients with immune system diseases (ISD). Therefore, analysis of the humoral and cellular responses against Spike is of utmost importance to manage ISD patients. A single-center retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 immunization in 87 ISD patients and 81 healthy controls. We performed a whole blood interferon gamma release assay using SARS-Cov2 Spike and Nucleocapsid recombinant proteins in order to evaluate T-cell memory response, and an IgG anti-Spike ELISA to evaluate humoral response. Cellular (26.4%) and humoral (44.8%) responses were negative against Spike in ISD patients following COVID-19 immunization. In univariate analysis, an anti-Spike T cell defective response was associated with the use of glucocorticoids (Odds ratio [OR] = 10.0; p < 10 -4 ), serum albumin level ≤40 g/L (OR = 18.9; p < 10 -4 ), age over 55 years old (OR = 3.9, p = 0.009) and ≤2 vaccine injections (OR = 4.9; p = 0.001). The impact of glucocorticoids persisted after adjustment for age and number of vaccine injections (OR = 8.38, p < 0.001). In contrast, the humoral response was impacted by the use of anti-CD20 mAb (OR = 24.8, p < 10 -4 ), and an extended time since immunization (≥75 days; OR = 4.3, p = 0.002). Double defective cellular/humoral responses (6.9%) were typically encountered in glucocorticoids and/or anti-CD20 mAb treated ISD with a serum albumin level ≤40 g/L (OR = 17.5; p = 0.002). Glucocorticoid usage, B cell depleting therapies, and a low serum albumin level were the main factors associated with a non-response to COVID-19 immunization in ISD patients. These results need further confirmation in larger studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Kappa free light chains (KFLC) seem to efficiently diagnose MS. However, extensive cohort studies are lacking to establish consensus cut-offs, notably to rule out non-MS autoimmune CNS disorders. Our objectives were to (1) determine diagnostic performances of CSF KFLC, KFLC index, and KFLC intrathecal fraction (IF) threshold values that allow us to separate MS from different CNS disorder control populations and compare them with oligoclonal bands' (OCB) performances and (2) to identify independent factors associated with KFLC quantification in MS., Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study involving 13 French MS centers. Patients were included if they had a noninfectious and nontumoral CNS disorder, eligible data concerning CSF and serum KFLC, albumin, and OCB. Patients were classified into 4 groups according to their diagnosis: MS, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), other inflammatory CNS disorders (OIND), and noninflammatory CNS disorder controls (NINDC)., Results: One thousand six hundred twenty-one patients were analyzed (675 MS, 90 CIS, 297 OIND, and 559 NINDC). KFLC index and KFLC IF had similar performances in diagnosing MS from nonselected controls and OIND ( p = 0.123 and p = 0.991 for area under the curve [AUC] comparisons) and performed better than CSF KFLC ( p < 0.001 for all AUC comparisons). A KFLC index of 8.92 best separated MS/CIS from the entire nonselected control population, with better performances than OCB ( p < 0.001 for AUC comparison). A KFLC index of 11.56 best separated MS from OIND, with similar performances than OCB ( p = 0.065). In the multivariate analysis model, female gender ( p = 0.003), young age ( p = 0.013), and evidence of disease activity ( p < 0.001) were independent factors associated with high KFLC index values in patients with MS, whereas MS phenotype, immune-modifying treatment use at sampling, and the FLC analyzer type did not influence KFLC index., Discussion: KFLC biomarkers are efficient tools to separate patients with MS from controls, even when compared with other patients with CNS autoimmune disorder. Given these results, we suggest using KFLC index or KFLC IF as a criterion to diagnose MS., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that KFLC index or IF can be used to differentiate patients with MS from nonselected controls and from patients with other autoimmune CNS disorders., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: It is currently unknown whether early B cell reconstitution (EBR) in MS patients under rituximab is associated with a risk of relapse or progression., Objectives: Analyzing EBR in rituximab-treated patients and its putative association with clinical findings., Methods: Prospective lymphocytes immunophenotyping was performed in a monocentric cohort of MS patients treated by rituximab for 2 years. EBR was defined when B cells concentration was > 5 cells/mm3. B cell subsets were retrospectively associated with clinical data. Clinical and radiological monitoring included relapses, EDSS (Expanded Disability Status Scale), SDMT (Symbol Digit Modalities Test), and MRI., Results: 182 patients were analyzed (61 remitting-relapsing and 121 progressive-active). 38.5% experienced EBR at least once, but very few (7/182) showed systematic reconstitution. Most patients remained stable upon treatment, regardless of the occurrence of EBR. Dynamics of B cell reconstitution featured increased naïve/transitional B cells, and decreased memory subsets. Homeostasis of the B cell compartment differed at baseline between patients experiencing or not EBR upon treatment. In patients with EBR, reciprocal dynamics of transitional and pro-inflammatory double-negative B cell subsets was associated with better response to rituximab treatment., Conclusion: EBR is common in rituximab-treated MS patients and is not associated with clinical disease activity. EBR in the peripheral blood may reflect regulatory immunological phenomena in subgroup of patients., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

The intrathecal production of oligoclonal immunoglobulin bands (OCB) is a prognostic factor for multiple sclerosis (MS) evolution in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients and a diagnostic factor for MS. The kappa free light chain (K)-index represents a quantitative automated alternative to OCB. We retrospectively evaluated OCB and K-index results in 274 patients with MS (n = 48) or CIS (n = 29) at diagnosis, non-MS inflammatory central nervous diseases (n = 35), and non-inflammatory central/peripheral nervous diseases (n = 162). Several cut-offs were established: a pathophysiological cut-off (K-index: 3.3) useful for differential diagnosis (negative predictive value for MS >99%), an optimised cut-off (K-index: 9.1) with better sensitivity and equivalent specificity than OCB for the diagnosis of MS, and a high-risk cut-off (K-index: >55.0) allowing prediction of MS (specificity 100%). We developed a scaled interpretation of the K-index and we discuss the usefulness of testing OCB only when the K-index is positive >3.3 to obtain a better specificity., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Late-onset neutropenia (LON) after anti-CD20 therapy is a poorly described side effect in inflammatory disorders of the CNS. In this prospective study, patients treated with Rituximab or Ocrelizumab for MS, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders or MOG antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) were asked to perform complete blood count (CBC) every two weeks for six months, with the aim of identifying LON. Out of 152 patients, two (1,32%) had an absolute neutrophil count <1,000/mm 3 : one patient with MOGAD had agranulocytosis and one patient with MS had grade 3 neutropenia. Both were asymptomatic. These results confirm that LON after anti-CD20 therapy in inflammatory disorders of the CNS is not exceptional. Nevertheless, this biological complication remains too infrequent to justify close systematic CBC follow-up., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Leptomeningeal enhancement (LME) is a key feature of Susac syndrome (SuS) but is only occasionally depicted on post-contrast T1-weighted images (T1-WI)., Objective: As post-contrast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) may be more sensitive, our aim was to assess LME in SuS on this sequence., Methods: From 2010 to 2020, 20 patients with definite SuS diagnosis were retrospectively enrolled in this multicentre study. Two radiologists independently assessed the number of LME on post-contrast FLAIR and T1-WI acquisitions performed before any treatment. A chi-square test was used to compare both sequences and the interrater agreement was calculated., Results: Thirty-five magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs) were performed before treatment, including 19 post-contrast FLAIR images in 17 patients and 25 post-contrast T1-WI in 19 patients. In terms of patients, LME was observed on all post-contrast FLAIR, contrary to post-contrast T1-WI (17/17 (100%) vs. 15/19 (79%), p  < 0.05). In terms of sequences, LME was observed on all post-contrast FLAIR, contrary to post-contrast T1-WI (19/19 (100%) vs. 16/25 (64%), p  < 0.005). LME was disseminated at both supratentorial (19/19) and infratentorial (18/19) levels on post-contrast FLAIR, contrary to post-contrast T1-WI (3/25 and 9/25, respectively). Interrater agreement was excellent for post-contrast FLAIR (κ = 0.95) but only moderate for post-contrast T1-WI (κ = 0.61)., Conclusion: LME was always observed and easily visible on post-contrast FLAIR images prior to SuS treatment. In association with other MRI features, it is highly indicative of SuS.

Background and Objectives: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), a humanized anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG-associated disease (MOGAD) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD)., Methods: Annualized relapse rate (ARR), Expanded Disability Status Scale score, MRI, autoantibody titers, pain, and adverse events were retrospectively evaluated in 57 patients with MOGAD (n = 14), aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG seropositive (n = 36), and seronegative NMOSD (n = 7; 12%), switched to TCZ from previous immunotherapies, particularly rituximab., Results: Patients received TCZ for 23.8 months (median; interquartile range 13.0-51.1 months), with an IV dose of 8.0 mg/kg (median; range 6-12 mg/kg) every 31.6 days (mean; range 26-44 days). For MOGAD, the median ARR decreased from 1.75 (range 0.5-5) to 0 (range 0-0.9; p = 0.0011) under TCZ. A similar effect was seen for AQP4-IgG+ (ARR reduction from 1.5 [range 0-5] to 0 [range 0-4.2]; p < 0.001) and for seronegative NMOSD (from 3.0 [range 1.0-3.0] to 0.2 [range 0-2.0]; p = 0.031). During TCZ, 60% of all patients were relapse free (79% for MOGAD, 56% for AQP4-IgG+, and 43% for seronegative NMOSD). Disability follow-up indicated stabilization. MRI inflammatory activity decreased in MOGAD ( p = 0.04; for the brain) and in AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD ( p < 0.001; for the spinal cord). Chronic pain was unchanged. Regarding only patients treated with TCZ for at least 12 months (n = 44), ARR reductions were confirmed, including the subgroups of MOGAD (n = 11) and AQP4-IgG+ patients (n = 28). Similarly, in the group of patients treated with TCZ for at least 12 months, 59% of them were relapse free, with 73% for MOGAD, 57% for AQP4-IgG+, and 40% for patients with seronegative NMOSD. No severe or unexpected safety signals were observed. Add-on therapy showed no advantage compared with TCZ monotherapy., Discussion: This study provides Class III evidence that long-term TCZ therapy is safe and reduces relapse probability in MOGAD and AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Objectives: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a disabling neurologic disorder resulting from the infection of the CNS by JC polyomavirus in immunocompromised individuals. For the last 2 decades, increasing use of immunotherapies leads to iatrogenic PML. Iatrogenic PML is often associated with signs of inflammation at onset (inflammatory PML) and/or after treatment withdrawal immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (PML-IRIS). Although immune reconstitution is a key element for viral clearance, it may also be harmful and induce clinical worsening. A C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) antagonist (maraviroc) has been proposed to prevent and/or limit the deleterious immune responses underlying PML-IRIS. However, the data to support its use remain scarce and disputed., Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study at 8 university hospitals in France and Switzerland by collecting clinical, biological, and radiologic data of patients who developed inflammatory PML (iPML) or PML-IRIS related to immunosuppressive therapies used for chronic inflammatory diseases between 2010 and 2020. We added to this cohort, a meta-analysis of individual case reports of patients with iPML/PML-IRIS treated with maraviroc published up to 2021., Results: Overall, 27 cases were identified in the cohort and 9 from the literature. Among them, 27 met the inclusion criteria: 16 treated with maraviroc and 11 with standard of care (including corticosteroids use). Most cases were related to MS (92.6%) and natalizumab (88%). Inflammatory features (iPML) were present at onset in 12 patients (44.4%), and most patients (92.6%) received corticosteroids within the course of PML. Aggravation due to PML-IRIS was not prevented by maraviroc compared with patients who received only corticosteroids (adjusted odds ratio: 0.408, 95% CI: 0.06-2.63). Similarly, maraviroc did not influence time to clinical worsening due to PML-IRIS (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.529, 95% CI: 0.14-2.0) or disability at the last follow-up (adjusted odds ratio: 2, 95% CI: 0.23-17.3)., Discussion: The use of CCR5 blockade did not help to keep deleterious immune reconstitution in check even when associated with corticosteroids. Despite maraviroc's reassuring safety profile, this study does not support its use in iPML/PML-IRIS., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence showing that adding maraviroc to the management of iatrogenic iPML/PML-IRIS does not improve the outcome., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)