Search

Although a striking female preponderance has been consistently reported in epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (EEM), no study has specifically explored the variability of clinical presentation according to sex in this syndrome. Here, we aimed to investigate sex-specific electroclinical differences and prognostic determinants in EEM. Data from 267 EEM patients were retrospectively analyzed by the EEM Study Group, and a dedicated multivariable logistic regression analysis was developed separately for each sex. We found that females with EEM showed a significantly higher rate of persistence of photosensitivity and eye closure sensitivity at the last visit, along with a higher prevalence of migraine with/without aura, whereas males with EEM presented a higher rate of borderline intellectual functioning/intellectual disability. In female patients, multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed age at epilepsy onset, eyelid myoclonia status epilepticus, psychiatric comorbidities, and catamenial seizures as significant predictors of drug resistance. In male patients, a history of febrile seizures was the only predictor of drug resistance. Hence, our study reveals sex-specific differences in terms of both electroclinical features and prognostic factors. Our findings support the importance of a sex-based personalized approach in epilepsy care and research, especially in genetic generalized epilepsies., (© 2023 International League Against Epilepsy.)

First, a short history is given of the use of the EEG as a biomarker of efficacy in anti-seizure medication (ASM) development. The generalized epileptiform EEG response to Intermittent Photic Stimulation (IPS), the photoparoxysmal EEG response or PPR, in particular, is a reliable reproducible measure since the 1950s. Over time, a "Photosensitivity Model", testing within the same patients the impact of potential new oral ASMs, along with dose-ranging data, on PPRs, has been developed successfully. The classical Photosensitivity Model consists of IPS and blood sampling for ASM measurement performed hourly between 8 AM and 5 PM over three consecutive days. This single-blind, placebo-controlled, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Model is now commonly utilized as a Proof-of-Concept Phase 2a trial. For Generalized Tonic-Clonic Status Epilepticus (GTCSE), it is especially relevant to know the time for CNS entry and effect minutes after i.v. ASM treatment, since "time is brain". We, therefore, adapted successfully the Model to a time-efficient Model with the determination of photosensitivity ranges in minutes after equivalent doses of iv brivaracetam (BRV) and levetiracetam (LEV). This modified design allows one to monitor the time to CNS effect (i.e., PPR elimination) of a quickly-acting FDA-approved ASM given i.v., a crucial element in status epilepticus treatment. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloqium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (EEM) has been associated with marked clinical heterogeneity. Early epilepsy onset has been recently linked to lower chances of achieving sustained remission and to a less favorable neuropsychiatric outcome. However, much work is still needed to better delineate this epilepsy syndrome., Methods: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we included 267 EEM patients from 9 countries. Data about electroclinical and demographic features, intellectual functioning, migraine with or without aura, family history of epilepsy and epilepsy syndromes in relatives were collected in each patient. The impact of age at epilepsy onset (AEO) on EEM clinical features was investigated, along with the distinctive clinical characteristics of patients showing sporadic myoclonia over body regions other than eyelids (body-MYO)., Results: Kernel density estimation revealed a trimodal distribution of AEO and Fisher-Jenks optimization disclosed three EEM subgroups: early-onset (EO-EEM), intermediate-onset (IO-EEM) and late-onset subgroup (LO-EEM). EO-EEM was associated with the highest rate of intellectual disability, antiseizure medication refractoriness and psychiatric comorbidities and with the lowest rate of family history of epilepsy. LO-EEM was associated with the highest proportion of body-MYO and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), whereas IO-EEM had the lowest observed rate of additional findings. A family history of EEM was significantly more frequent in IO-EEM and LO-EEM compared with EO-EEM. In the subset of patients with body-MYO (58/267), we observed a significantly higher rate of migraine and GTCS but no relevant differences in other electroclinical features and seizure outcome., Significance: Based on AEO, we identified consistent EEM subtypes characterized by distinct electroclinical and familial features. Our observations shed new light on the spectrum of clinical features of this generalized epilepsy syndrome and may help clinicians towards a more accurate classification and prognostic profiling of EEM patients., (This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Red-light filtering lenses represent an additional option to medication in photosensitive epilepsy. Blue lenses (Clarlet Z1 F133) can dramatically reduce seizure frequency, with a substantial restriction in luminance that can limit their applicability in daily life. We investigated the efficacy of 4 blue lenses with higher transmittance and reduced chromatic distortion in abolishing the photoparoxysmal EEG response (PPR) compared to the gold-standard Z1 lenses., Methods: We reviewed EEG data during photic-and pattern stimulation in 19 consecutive patients (6-39 years) with photosensitivity (PS). Stimulation was performed at baseline and while wearing Z1 and the four new lenses. Lenses were tested in the same session by asking the patient to wear them in a sequentially randomized fashion while stimulating again with the most provocative photic/pattern stimuli. The primary outcome was the change in the initial PPR observed for each lens, categorized as no change, reduction, and abolition., Results: Photosensitivity was detected in 17 subjects (89.5%); pattern sensitivity (PtS) was identified in 14 patients (73.7%). The highest percentages of PPR abolition/reduction were observed with Z1, for both PS and PtS. Regarding the new lenses, B1 + G1 offered the best rates, followed by B1 + G2. B1 + G3 and B1 showed lower efficacy rates, particularly for PtS. In the comparative analysis, no significant differences in PPR suppression were detected between the five lenses for PS. For PtS, the capacity of Z1 for PPR abolition was significantly higher compared with B1 + G3 and B1., Conclusions: This preliminary study suggests efficacy of the new group of blue lenses with potentially greater tolerability, particularly in regions with fewer sunlight hours during winter. In line with the current trend for personalized approach to treatment, this study suggests that in some patients there might be scope in extending the testing to offer the lens with the higher transmittance effective in abolishing the PPR., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests The authors have no competing interests to disclose. The company Cerium Optical Products provided the lenses used for testing free of charge, (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Electroencephalography (EEG) remains an essential diagnostic tool for people with epilepsy (PWE). The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology produces new guidelines as an educational service for clinicians to address gaps in knowledge in clinical neurophysiology. The current guideline was prepared in response to gaps present in epilepsy-related neurophysiological assessment and is not intended to replace sound clinical judgement in the care of PWE. Furthermore, addressing specific pathophysiological conditions of the brain that produce epilepsy is of primary importance though is beyond the scope of this guideline. Instead, our goal is to summarize the scientific evidence for the utility of EEG when diagnosing and monitoring PWE., (Copyright © 2018 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The 'Photosensitivity Model' uses a standardized stimulation protocol of repeated intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) over a three-day period, with administration of a single dose of an investigational antiepileptic drug (AED) after a baseline IPS day in photosensitive patients, followed by a third IPS day to determine duration of effect. This 'Photosensitivity Model' has shown its value in the development of new AEDs. Levetiracetam (LEV), currently a first-line AED in new-onset focal epilepsies, was not effective in classical animal models, but showed dose-dependent efficacy in the human 'Photosensitivity Model'. Nevertheless, concerns have been expressed that AEDs selectively suppressing focal seizures might not suppress generalized photoparoxysmal EEG responses (PPR), the pharmacodynamic outcome measure in the Model. Herein, the following questions have been addressed: I. Can patients with generalized epileptiform discharges, evoked by IPS, so-called PPR, have focal epilepsy (focal seizures)? II. Are the photosensitive patients with focal epilepsy, who have participated in the photosensitivity trials, non-responsive to a new AED under investigation, as compared to those with generalized epilepsies? III. Are "focal epilepsy" AEDs effective both in the 'Photosensitivity Model' and in real life in photosensitive patients? We performed a systematic literature review of PPR in focal seizures and focal epilepsy and we analyzed data (published and unpublished) from 20 different potential AEDs studied prospectively in the 'Photosensitivity Model'. Finally, the PPR effects of Na + channel-blocking AEDs (considered as the most typical AEDs for focal epilepsy) are discussed with unequivocal examples given of the focal nature of a patient's PPR. Based on the entire data evidence, we conclude that: 1. PPRs certainly exist in focal epilepsy (17% on average); 2. Clinical signs and symptoms of PPRs can be focal and 3. PPRs can definitely be used to identify or to prove efficacy of new AEDs for patients with focal epilepsy., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)