Search

Introduction: During gastric cancer resection, back table dissection (BTD) involves examination and separation of lymph node (LN) packets from the surgical specimen based on LN stations, which are sent to pathology as separately labeled specimens. With potential impact on clinical outcomes, we aimed to explore how BTD affects number of LNs examined. Methods: A retrospective review of a gastric cancer database was performed, including all cases of gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy from January 2009 to March 2022. Back table dissection and conventional groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. Multiple linear regression modeling was used to identify potential predictors of number of LN examined. Results: A total of 174 patients were identified: 39 (22%) BTD and 135 (78%) conventional. More patients in the BTD group underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (62% vs 29%, P < .05). Compared to the conventional group, the BTD group had a greater number of LNs examined (42 [26-59] vs 21[15-33], median [IQR], P < .001), lower LNpositivity ratio (.01 vs .07, P = .013), and greater number of LNs in patients with BMI >35 (32.5[27.5-39] vs 22[13-27], P = .041). A multiple linear regression model controlling for age, BMI, preoperative N stage, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgeon experience, and operative approach identified BTD as a significant positive predictor of number of LN examined (β = 19.7, P = .001). Conclusion: Back table dissection resulted in improved LN yield during gastric cancer resection. As a simple technical addition, BTD helps enhance pathology examination and improve surgeon awareness, which may ultimately translate to improve oncologic outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We performed a propensity score matched study comparing patients' short- and long-term results after laparoscopic omentum-preserving gastrectomy and open surgery with omentectomy with UICC stages 0–IV. Methods: Between 2015 and 2022, 311 patients with gastric cancer underwent surgery at the University Clinical Centre Maribor. Of these, 249 met the inclusion criteria and 198 were included in the study group after PSM. Results: Patients in both groups were well-balanced in demographic and pathological characteristics after PSM. There was no significant difference in the 5-year survival between groups (LAP: 62.2% vs. OPN: 54.4%; p = 0.950). The Cox regression model identified UICC stage and age as significant predictors for survival. In both groups, peritoneal dissemination was the most common site of recurrence. The multivariate analysis identified the UICC stage as a significant predictor for peritoneal recurrence, while omental preservation was not associated with a higher risk of peritoneal dissemination. Omentum preservation was not associated with more intestinal obstruction. Patients in the LAP group had significantly shorter hospital stays (LAP: 9(6) vs. OPN: 10(5); p = 0.009), less postoperative morbidity (LAP: 17% vs. OPN: 23.4%; p = 0.009), and significantly more extracted LNs per operation compared to open surgery (LAP: 31 ± 11 LNs vs. OPN: 25 ± 12 LNs; p = 0.002). Conclusion: Based on our results, we recommend the use of laparoscopic omentum-preserving gastrectomy in patients with early and advanced gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with T1-3N0M0 gastric cancer (GC) who undergo radical gastrectomy maintain a high recurrence rate. The free cancer cells in the mesogastric adipose connective tissue (Metastasis V) maybe the reason for recurrence in these individuals. We aimed to evaluate whether D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastrium excision (D2 + CME) was superior to D2 lymphadenectomy with regard to safety and oncological efficacy for T1-3N0M0 GC. Methods: Patients with T1-3N0M0 GC who underwent radical resection from January 2014 to July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed; there were 323 patients, of whom 185 were in the D2 + CME group and 138 in the D2 group. The primary endpoint was 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints include the 5-year overall survival (OS), recurrence pattern, morbidity, mortality, and surgical outcomes. Results: D2 + CME was associated with less intraoperative bleeding loss, a greater number of lymph nodes harvested, and less time to first postoperative flatus, but the postoperative morbidity was similar. The 5-year DFS was 95.6% (95% CI 92.7–98.5%) and 90.4% (95% CI 85.5–95.3%) in the D2 + CME group and the D2 group, respectively, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.455 (95% CI 0.188–1.097; p = 0.071). In terms of recurrence patterns, local recurrence was more prone to occur in the D2 group (p = 0.031). Subgroup analysis indicated that for patients with T1b-3N0M0 GC, the 5-year DFS in the D2 + CME group was considerably greater than that in the D2 group (95.3% [95% CI 91.6–99.0%] vs. 87.6% [95% CI 80.7–94.5%], HR 0.369, 95% CI 0.138–0.983; log-rank p = 0.043). Conclusion: Laparoscopic D2 + CME for T1-3N0M0 GC is safe and feasible. Furthermore, it not only reduces the local recurrence rate but also improves the 5-year DFS in cases of T1b-3N0M0 GC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Debate exists regarding the effect of D2 vs. D1 lymphadenectomy on long-term oncological outcomes after gastrectomy for cancer. The aim of our individual patient data meta-analysis was to assess the impact of D2 lymphadenectomy on long-term survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Compared with previous randomized trials, we confirmed a trend toward improved overall survival (1.8 months; 95% CI −4.2, 0.7; p = 0.14), cancer specific survival (1.2 months, 95% CI −3.9, 5.7; p = 0.72), and disease-free survival (0.8 months, 95% CI −1.7, 3.4; p = 0.53) at 60-month follow-up for D2 lymphadenectomy. Compared to D1, D2 lymphadenectomy is associated with a clinical trend toward improved OS, CSS, and DFS at 60-month follow-up. Background: Debate exists concerning the impact of D2 vs. D1 lymphadenectomy on long-term oncological outcomes after gastrectomy for cancer. Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) analyzing the effect of D2 vs. D1 on survival were included. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed. Restricted mean survival time difference (RMSTD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as effect size measures. Results: Five RCTs (1653 patients) were included. Overall, 805 (48.7%) underwent D2 lymphadenectomy. The RMSTD OS analysis shows that at 60-month follow-up, D2 patients lived 1.8 months (95% CI −4.2, 0.7; p = 0.14) longer on average compared to D1 patients. Similarly, 60-month CSS (1.2 months, 95% CI −3.9, 5.7; p = 0.72) and DFS (0.8 months, 95% CI −1.7, 3.4; p = 0.53) tended to be improved for D2 vs. D1 lymphadenectomy. Conclusions: Compared to D1, D2 lymphadenectomy is associated with a clinical trend toward improved OS, CSS, and DFS at 60-month follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stomach carcinoma, the second most prevalent malignancy in Asia, poses a substantial global public health challenge. Gastric adenocarcinoma, comprising over 90% of cases, necessitates optimal treatment modalities, primarily RO resection, to achieve locoregional control. Lymph node metastasis, the primary mode of spread, underscores the importance of meticulous lymphadenectomy. The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) guidelines delineate the critical role of D2 lymphadenectomy in staging and controlling gastric carcinoma. Methodology: This retrospective study, conducted at SCB Medical College & Hospital, assesses the necessity of routine D2 lymphadenectomy in operable cases of gastric carcinoma. Forty-six patients meeting specific criteria underwent detailed workup, including hematological and radiological evaluations. Operable cases underwent gastric resection with D2 lymphadenectomy, targeting a minimum of 16 lymph nodes. Extended resections and palliative procedures were performed as needed. Results: The study comprised 46 patients (56% male, 44% female), aged 55-65 years. Clinical presentations included dyspepsia (63%), weight loss (54.3%), and less common symptoms. Antral growth was predominant (54.3%). Operable cases (87%) underwent successful D2 lymphadenectomy with minimal complications (4% pulmonary complications, 6% wound infections). The majority were stage II and III (77.5%). Two-year follow-up indicated a 5% mortality and recurrence rate. Discussion: Surgical intervention, particularly D2 lymphadenectomy, remains the most effective therapeutic option for gastric carcinoma. Our study aligns with JGCA guidelines, emphasizing the importance of D2 lymphadenectomy in achieving locoregional control. The inadequacy of D1 lymphadenectomy is evident, highlighting the significance of removing an adequate number of lymph nodes. Despite concerns, evidence suggests that the current form of D2 lymphadenectomy is not more hazardous than D1, and maximal lymph node removal correlates with improved long-term survival. Conclusion: Our study underscores the critical role of D2 lymphadenectomy in achieving optimal locoregional control and improving overall survival in gastric carcinoma. The meticulous removal of an adequate number of lymph nodes is imperative, emphasizing adherence to established guidelines for lymphadenectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Local recurrence is a significant issue for advanced gastric cancer patients. Complete mesogastric excision (CME) has been advocated to enhance lymph node (LN) retrieval and reduce recurrence rates. A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the Cochrane recommendations, and meta-analyses of means and binary outcomes were developed. The number of lymph nodes retrieved was the primary endpoint, with other postoperative outcomes as secondary. Thirteen studies were included, showing that the mean number of harvested LNs was significantly higher among patients undergoing CME. CME patients also had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, a shorter length of stay, and a shorter operative time. Radical gastrectomy with CME may provide a safe and more radical lymphadenectomy. Long-term outcomes and the applicability of this technique in the West are still to be proven. Complete mesogastric excision (CME) has been advocated to allow for a more extensive retrieval of lymph nodes, as well as lowering loco-regional recurrence rates. This study aims to analyze the short-term outcomes of D2 radical gastrectomy with CME compared to standard D2 gastrectomy. A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the Cochrane recommendations until 2 July 2023 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023443361). The primary outcome, expressed as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), was the number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs). Meta-analyses of means and binary outcomes were developed using random effects models to assess heterogeneity. The risk of bias in included studies was assessed with the RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. There were 13 studies involving 2009 patients that were included, revealing a significantly higher mean number of harvested LNs in the CME group (MD: 2.55; 95% CI: 0.25–4.86; 95%; p = 0.033). The CME group also experienced significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, a lower length of stay, and a shorter operative time. Three studies showed a serious risk of bias, and between-study heterogeneity was mostly moderate or high. Radical gastrectomy with CME may offer a safe and more radical lymphadenectomy, but long-term outcomes and the applicability of this technique in the West are still to be proven. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Gastric cancer is increasing worldwide and one million new cases were estimated globally in 2020. Use of the laparoscopic approach is increasing especially for subtotal gastrectomy. However, to date, solid data on locally advanced bulky tumors are lacking. The aim of this study is to assess the role of laparoscopic surgery in bulky gastric tumors. Methods: We performed an observational retrospective single-center analysis. The following data were collected and analyzed for each patient: demographics, tumor-related data, intra-operative data, peri-operative data, and pathological data. Statistical analysis was conducted, including descriptive statistics and chi-squared test, to analyze the differences between categorical variables. Results: O the 116 patients who underwent gastric surgery, 49 patients were included in the study protocol. All patients had bulky gastric tumors. Eighteen patients underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy and 31 open gastrectomy. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 28.5 (15–46) in the laparoscopic group and 23.05 (6–62) in the open group (p = 0.04). In total, 5.6% of patients of the laparoscopic group had <16 lymph nodes harvested and 35.5% in the open group (p = 0.035). No statistical differences were found between the open and laparoscopic groups in terms of surgical margins (p = 0.69). Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery is still a subject of debate in locally advanced bulky gastric cancer. Limited data are available concerning Western patients. This study showed superiority in terms of the quality of lymphadenectomy and non-inferiority in terms of radical resection margins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to audit the 22 items and assessed each item's predictive value on surgical outcomes. Background: The KLASS-02 trial revealed that the oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy are not inferior to open distal gastrectomy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. The surgeons participating in this trialwere chosen based on the assessment scores from the KLASS-02-QC trial, which used 22 items for standardization of D2 lymphadenectomy and quality control. Methods: We reviewed proficiency scores (PSs) for 22 items for 20 surgeons who participated in KLASS-02. The surgeons were divided into 2 groups according to PS, and the perioperative outcomes of 924 patients enrolled in KLASS-02 were compared between groups. Each item's predictive value for perioperative outcome was then assessed using multivariable regression models. Results: Of the total 924 patients, 529 were operated on by high-score surgeons (high PS) and 395 were operated on by low-score surgeons (low-PS). High-PS group had less intraoperative blood loss, longer operation times, and fewer complications,major complications, reoperations, and shorter first flatus and hospital stay than low-PS group (P=0.006, P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001, P=0.042, P=0.013, and P<0.001, respectively). Some items used in KLASS-02-QC predicted perioperative outcomes, such as intraoperative blood loss, major complications, reoperation, and hospital stay. Conclusions: Although this study only analyzed data associated with qualified surgeons, the 22 items effectively assessed the surgeons based on PS. A high score was associated with longer operation times, but better perioperative outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gastric neoplasms include lesions ranging from benign polyps to invasive adenocarcinoma causing gastric outlet obstruction. The most common are gastric adenocarcinoma, followed by lymphoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) and other rarer neoplasms. Gastric cancer is one of the commonest cancers worldwide. Symptoms of early gastric cancer are non-specific and most patients present with established disease. Consequently, 5-year survival for gastric cancer remains poor. Diagnosis is typically made with endoscopic assessment and biopsy, with completion of staging by EUS, CT, CT-PET and staging laparoscopy. The established treatment paradigm for potentially curative disease is by the 'perioperative approach' with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy affording an all-stage 5-year survival of 35%–40%. GISTs are mesenchymal in origin with a low rate of metastasis or direct invasion. Once histological confirmation has been made, typically by EUS and core needle biopsy, the tumour can be excised or down-staged by neo-adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib. Adjuvant TKIs are also indicated for advanced or aggressive type GISTs. Lesions such as neuroendocrine tumours require complete staging, and non-functioning types may be resected primarily. Lymphomas and carcinoids have a divergent pathophysiology and rarely require resection, responding to systemic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) in D2 radical gastrectomy. Methods Sixty patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical surgery at Ma'anshan Shiqiye Hospital from April 2017 to December 2020 were selected as the study subjects. They were randomly divided into a HALS group of 30 patients and a traditional open surgery (OS) group of 30 patients by a lottery method. The intra- and post-operative indicators of the two groups were compared, and the survival status was followed up on December 10, 2022. Results In HALS group, the operation time was longer, the intraoperative blood loss and the incision length were smaller, time to exhaust, time to intaking total fluid diet and time to getting out of bed after operation were earlier, and the numerical pain rating (NRS) scores at 6-, 12-, 24- and 48-h after operation were lower, compared with those in OS group (P＜0.05＝. There was no statistical difference in the removal time of abdominal drainage tubes, postoperative hospital stay, number of lymph nodes cleaned, disease-free survival and overall survival between two groups (P＞0.05). The overall incidence of postoperative complications in HALS group was significantly lower than that in OS group (16.67%vs 40.00%, χ=4.02, P＜0.05). Conclusion HALS has lesser trauma and fewer postoperative complications, with safe and feasible in D2 radical surgery for gastric cancer patients. HALS combines the minimally invasive characteristics of laparoscopic surgery with the touch of the surgeon's hand, which reduces the difficulty of operation and is more convenient for complicated abdominal surgery, and can become one of the surgical treatment methods for gastric cancer.

Objective: Retrospectively analyzed the short- and long-term efficacy between laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy plus regional complete mesogastrium excision (D2 + rCME) and traditional laparoscopic D2 in the treatment of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), in order to obtain more evidence for D2 + rCME gastrectomy. Methods: A total of 599 LAGC patients who underwent laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy from January 2014 to December 2019, including 367 cases in the D2 + rCME group and 232 cases in the D2 group. Intraoperative and postoperative clinicopathological parameters, postoperative complications and long-term survival in the two groups were statistically analyzed. Results: No significant differences in the positive rate of mesogastric tumor deposits, the number of positive lymph nodes and postoperative length of stay were found between the two groups (P > 0.05). In the D2 + rCME group, intraoperative blood loss was significantly reduced (84.20 ± 57.64 ml vs. 148.47 ± 76.97 ml, P < 0.001), the time to first postoperative flatus and first liquid diet intake were significantly shortened (3[2–3] days vs. 3[3–3] days, P < 0.001; 7[7–8] days vs. 8[7–8] days, P < 0.001), and the number of lymph nodes dissected was greater (43.57 ± 16.52 pieces vs. 36.72 ± 13.83 pieces, P < 0.001). The incidence of complications did not significantly differ between the D2 + rCME group (20.7%) and D2 group (19.4%) (P > 0.05). Although there was no statistically difference in 3-year OS and DFS between the two groups. However, the trend was better in D2 + rCME group. In subgroup analysis, patients with positive tumor deposits (TDs) in the D2 + rCME group had significantly better 3-year DFS compared With D2 group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic D2 + rCME is safe and feasible for the treatment of LAGC and is characterized by less bleeding, greater lymph node dissection and rapid recovery, without increasing postoperative complications. D2 + rCME group showed a better trend of long-term efficacy, especially significant beneficial for LAGC patients who with positive TDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: At present, there is still no definite conclusion on whether advanced gastric cancer (GC) requires additional para-aortic nodes dissection (PAND). The purpose of this study is to summarize current evidence on the potential benefits of the extended systemic lymphadenectomy (D2+) compared to D2 lymphadenectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, and China Biology Medicine disc using the following terms: gastric cancer, para-aortic lymphadenectomy, D2+ lymphadenectomy and D3 lymphadenectomy. RevMan 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies involving 5,643 patients were included, consisting of 6 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 14 non-randomized controlled trials (nRCT). Compared with the D2 group, the operating time in the D2+ group was longer [mean difference (MD)=99.45 min, 95% confidence interval (CI) (48.93, 149.97), p<0.001], with more intra-operative blood loss [MD=262.14 mL, 95% CI (165.21, 359.07), p<0.001]. There were no significant differences in five-year overall survival (OS) [HR=1.09, 95% CI (0.95, 1.25), p=0.22] and post-operative mortality [RR=0.96, 95% CI (0.59, 1.57), p=0.88] between the two groups. The rate of post-operative complications in group D2+ was higher than that in group D2 [RR=1.42, 95% CI (1.11, 1.81), p<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic D2+ surgery is not recommended, since D2+ surgery is associated with an increased rate of post-operative complications and does not improve the longterm survival rate of patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, D2+ surgery (especially D2+PAND) has certain survival advantages for specific patients, and D2+PAND surgery combined with chemotherapy may potentially improve long-term survival rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer is widely accepted and routinely performed. However, it is still debated whether the laparoscopic approach is a valid alternative to open gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aim of this study is to compare short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic (LG) and open (OG) total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in patients with AGC. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted on patients who underwent LG and OG for ACG between January 2015 and December 2021. Primary endpoints were the following: recurrence rate, 3-year disease-free survival, 3-year and 5-year overall survival. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted to compare variables influencing outcomes and survival. Results: Ninety-two patients included: fifty-three OG and thirty-nine LG. No difference in morbidity and mortality. LG was associated with lower recurrence rates (OG 22.6% versus LG 12.8%, p = 0.048). No differences in 3-year and 5-year overall survival; 3-year disease-free survival was improved in the LG group on the univariate analysis but not after the multivariate one. LG was associated with longer operative time, lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay. Lymph node yield was higher in LG. Conclusion: LG for AGC seems to provide satisfactory clinical and oncological outcomes in medium volume centers, improved postoperative results and possibly lower recurrence rates.

Abstract Background The effectiveness of laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy (LTGD2) remains controversial. This meta-analysis compares surgical and survival outcomes of LTGD2 and open total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy (OTGD2) for gastric cancer. Methods Controlled studies comparing LTGD2 and OTGD2 published before November 2021 were retrieved via database searches. We compared intraoperative outcomes, pathological data, postoperative outcomes, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results 17 studies were included, containing 4742 patients. Compared with OTGD2, the LTGD2 group had less blood loss (mean difference [MD] = − 122.48; 95% CI: − 187.60, − 57.37; P = 0.0002), fewer analgesic medication (MD = -2.48; 95% CI: − 2.69, − 2.27; P

Background: Resectable gastric cancer (GC) patients with small para-aortic lymph node (smaller than 10mm in diameter, sPAN) were seldom reported, and existing guidelines did not provide definite treatment recommendation for them. Methods: A total of 667 consecutive resectable GC patients were enrolled. 98 patients were in the sPAN group, and 569 patients without enlarged para-aortic lymph node were in the nPAN group. Standard D2 lymphadenectomy was performed. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy were administrated according to the cTNM and pTNM stage, respectively. Clinicopathological features and prognosis were compared between these two groups. Results: The median size of sPAN was 6 (range, 2-9)mmand the distribution was prevalent in No. 16b1. cN stage (p=0.001) was significantly related to the presence of sPAN. sPAN was both independent risk factor for OS (p=0.031) and RFS (p=0.046) of all patients. The prognosis of patients with sPAN was significantly worse than that of patients with nPAN (OS: p=0.008; RFS: p=0.007). Preoperative CEA and CA19-9 were independent risk factors for prognosis of patients with sPAN. Furthermore, patients in the sPAN group with normal CEA and CA19-9 exhibited acceptable prognosis (5-year OS: 67%; RFS: 64%), while those with elevated CEA or CA19-9 suffered significantly poorer prognosis (5-year OS: 17%; RFS: 17%) than patients in the nPAN group (5-year OS: 64%; RFS 62%) (both p < 0.05). Conclusions: Standard D2 lymphadenectomy should be considered a valid approach for GC patients with sPAN associate to normal preoperative CEA and CA19-9 levels. Patients with sPAN associated to elevated CEA or CA19-9 levels could benefit from a multimodal approach: neoadjuvant chemotherapy; radical surgery with D2 plus lymph nodal dissection extended to No. 16 station. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The number of lymph nodes is used to determine the prognosis in patients with gastric cancer undergoing D2 lymph node dissection. However, a group of extraperigastric lymph nodes, including lymph node 8a, are also considered to be effective in prognosis. In our clinical experience, in most patients during D2 lymph node dissection, the lymph nodes are removed en-bloc with the specimen and are not marked separately. The aim was to analyze the importance and prognostic impact of 8a lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: Patients who underwent gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer between 2015 and 2022 were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups based on metastasis to the 8a lymph node: metastatic and nonmetastatic. The effect of clinicopathologic features and the prevalence of lymph node metastasis on the prognosis of the two groups were analyzed. Results: The present study included 78 patients. The mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 27 (IQR, 15–62). There were 22 (28.2%) patients in the 8a lymph node metastatic group. Patients with 8a lymph node metastatic disease had shorter overall survival and shorter disease-free survival. Those with metastatic 8a lymph nodes among pathologic N2/3 patients had shorter overall and disease-free survival rates (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, we believe that anterior common hepatic artery (8a) LN metastasis is a key factor that negatively affects both disease-free and overall survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Opinion statement: The surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma has progressed significantly in the past few decades. A major milestone was the establishment of multimodal therapies for locally advanced tumours. Improvements in the technique of endoscopic resection have supplanted surgery in the early stages of many cases of gastric cancer. In cases in which an endoscopic resection is not possible, surgical limited resection procedures for the early stages of carcinoma are an equal alternative to gastrectomy in the field of oncology. Proximal gastrectomy is extensively discussed in this context. Whether proximal gastrectomy leads to a better quality of life and better nutritional well-being than total gastrectomy depends on the reconstruction chosen. The outcome cannot be conclusively assessed at present. For locally advanced stages, total or subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is now the global standard. A subtotal gastrectomy requires sufficiently long tumour-free proximal resection margins. Recent data indicate that proximal margins of at least 3 cm for tumours with an expansive growth pattern and at least 5 cm for those with an infiltrative growth pattern are sufficient. The most frequently performed reconstruction worldwide following gastrectomy is the Roux-en-Y reconstruction. However, there is evidence that pouch reconstruction is superior in terms of quality of life and nutritional well-being. Oncological gastric surgery is increasingly being performed laparoscopically. The safety and oncological equivalency were first demonstrated for early carcinomas and then for locally advanced tumours, by cohort studies and RCTs. Some studies suggest that laparoscopic procedures may be advantageous in early postoperative recovery. Robotic gastrectomy is also increasing in use. Preliminary results suggest that robotic gastrectomy may have added value in lymphadenectomy and in the early postoperative course. However, further studies are needed to substantiate these results. There is an ongoing debate about the best treatment option for gastric cancer with oligometastatic disease. Preliminary results indicate that certain patient groups could benefit from resection of the primary tumour and metastases following chemotherapy. However, the exact conditions in which patients may benefit have yet to be confirmed by ongoing trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer is widely accepted and routinely performed. However, it is still debated whether the laparoscopic approach is a valid alternative to open gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aim of this study is to compare short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic (LG) and open (OG) total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in patients with AGC. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted on patients who underwent LG and OG for ACG between January 2015 and December 2021. Primary endpoints were the following: recurrence rate, 3-year disease-free survival, 3-year and 5-year overall survival. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted to compare variables influencing outcomes and survival. Results: Ninety-two patients included: fifty-three OG and thirty-nine LG. No difference in morbidity and mortality. LG was associated with lower recurrence rates (OG 22.6% versus LG 12.8%, p = 0.048). No differences in 3-year and 5-year overall survival; 3-year disease-free survival was improved in the LG group on the univariate analysis but not after the multivariate one. LG was associated with longer operative time, lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay. Lymph node yield was higher in LG. Conclusion: LG for AGC seems to provide satisfactory clinical and oncological outcomes in medium volume centers, improved postoperative results and possibly lower recurrence rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although laparoscopy has some limitations related to tumor size or location along the colon, it has been demonstrated that the oncological results are just as good as for open surgery. One can also add to the benefits faster recovery and start of chemotherapy, with lower rates of complications. Our study aimed to compare open surgery to laparoscopy for non-complicated colon tumors operated in an average case-load center and appreciate its feasibility with regards to the T stage, lymph node yield and conversions. The study is retrospective and expanded over four years (January 2020-January 2024). One hundred sixty-two patients were included in the study. We observed that female patients were frequently operated through laparoscopy (p=0.003). T1 and T2 tumors represented the majority of the tumors in the laparoscopy group (p=0.004). No statistical difference existed in terms of lymph node yield. Laparoscopy was avoided for tumors of the splenic angle (p=0.006). Concluding our results, minimally invasive surgery for non-complicated colon cancer is non-inferior to open surgery. Considerable expertise is required to take on more complex cases such as difficult-to-access tumors or large, invasive cancers. It can and should be offered to patients as an alternative to open surgery., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Review Board (IRB) Emergency Clinical Hospital Floreasca issued approval 342/22.02.2024. The study adhered to the ethical principles and the authors have ensured the anonymity of the data collected. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Macovei Oprescu et al.)

Background: The effectiveness of laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy (LTGD2) remains controversial. This meta-analysis compares surgical and survival outcomes of LTGD2 and open total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy (OTGD2) for gastric cancer. Methods: Controlled studies comparing LTGD2 and OTGD2 published before November 2021 were retrieved via database searches. We compared intraoperative outcomes, pathological data, postoperative outcomes, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: 17 studies were included, containing 4742 patients. Compared with OTGD2, the LTGD2 group had less blood loss (mean difference [MD] = − 122.48; 95% CI: − 187.60, − 57.37; P = 0.0002), fewer analgesic medication (MD = -2.48; 95% CI: − 2.69, − 2.27; P < 0.00001), earlier first flatus (MD = − 1.03; 95% CI: − 1.80, − 0.26; P = 0.009), earlier initial food intake (MD = − 0.89; 95% CI: − 1.09, − 0.68; P < 0.00001) and shorter hospital stay (MD = − 3.24; 95% CI: − 3.75, − 2.73; P < 0.00001). The LTGD2 group had lower postoperative total complication ratio (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.92; P = 0.006), incision (OR = 0.50; 95% CI:0.31, 0.79; P = 0.003) and pulmonary (OR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.96; P = 0.03) complication rates, but similar rates of other complications and mortality. Total number of dissected lymph nodes were similar, but the number of No. 10 dissected nodes was less with LTGD2 (MD = − 0.31; 95% CI: − 0.46, − 0.16; P < 0.0001). There was no difference in 5-year OS (P = 0.19) and DFS (P = 0.34) between LTGD2 and OTGD2 groups. Conclusions: LTGD2 produces small trauma, fast postoperative recovery and small length of hospital stays than OTGD2, and had similar long-term clinical efficacy as OTGD2. However, these results still need further high-quality prospective randomized controlled trials confirmation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: D3 lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer improves oncological outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to compare operation data, histopathological characteristics, perioperative conditions, and long-term survival after D3 and D2 lymphadenectomy in right hemicolectomy. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant articles (up to March 31, 2020). Random-effects and fixed-effects meta-analysis models were used. Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3 and Stata version 15.1 were used for pooled estimates. Results: After screening 714 articles, 7 articles with a total of 1368 patients were eligible for inclusion. Compared with D2, D3 lymphadenectomy improves results in terms of blood loss (weighted mean difference [WMD] = −20.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] −28.19 to −13.16, P <.01), harvested lymph nodes (WMD = 8.86, 95% CI 7.74 to 9.98, P <.01), 3-year overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.03, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.43, P <.01), 5-year OS (HR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.30, P =.02), and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.90, P =.01). There was no significant difference regarding operation time, anastomosis leakage, wound infection, overall morbidity, postoperative hospital stay, mortality, length of dissected colon, and 3-year DFS (P >=.05). Conclusions: It is suggested in this review that D3 lymphadenectomy is superior to D2 lymphadenectomy in terms of blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, 3-year OS, 5-year OS, and 5-year DFS. The conclusion must be drawn with caution due to the limited number of included studies. Further RCTs are needed for stronger evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide, with an incidence of 6.72 per 100,000 people. Thirty-two percent of gastric cancer patients will live 5 years after diagnosis. Single-site metastasis is noted in 26% of patients with gastric cancer, most commonly in the liver (48%), peritoneum (32%), lung (15%), and bone (12%). Here, a case is presented in which a single skeletal muscle metastasis appeared after appropriate resection and treatment. Case presentation A 63-year-old man underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a multivisceral en bloc R0 resection. Final pathology showed no evidence of lymph node metastasis with 31 negative lymph nodes. Four months postoperatively, the patient was found to have a rapidly growing biopsy-proven extremity soft tissue gastric metastasis within the brachioradialis muscle. He subsequently underwent metastasectomy and immunotherapy. Conclusion This case is a rare example of an isolated extremity metastasis of gastric adenocarcinoma in the setting of an R0 resection of the primary tumor and negative nodal disease on final pathology, suggestive of hematogenous spread. We review the biology, workup, and management of gastric cancer and highlight new advancements in the treatment of this aggressive cancer.

Background: The near-infrared/indocyanine green imaging fluorescence (NIR/ICG) technology is showing promising results in several fields of surgical oncology. The clinical value of NIR/ICG technology in the surgical treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is not clearly established. Methods: This is the protocol of the "iGreenGO" (indocyanine Green Gastric Observation) Study, a national prospective multicenter study. Western patients who undergo curative-intent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for AGC constitute the study cohort. All the patients undergo preoperative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for submucosal peritumoral ICG injection at the most 20 h before surgery. Intraoperative endoscopic injection before starting surgical dissection is also allowed. The primary endpoint is the "change in the surgical conduct" (CSC), i.e., the need to perform further dissection after intraoperative NIR/ICG technology activation at the end of D2 lymphadenectomy. Secondary endpoints include the pattern of abdominal fluorescence distribution according to tumor and patient characteristics, the preoperative clinical variables potentially associated with CSC, and the incidence of stage migration due to NIR/ICG application. Discussion: The iGreenGO Study is the first study to investigate the clinical role of NIR/ICG technology for the surgical treatment of AGC in a large cohort of Western patients. Results from the present study can further clarify the role of NIR/ICG technology in surgical lymphadenectomy for AGC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Although D2 lymphadenectomy is currently considered a standard procedure for advanced gastric cancer (GC) worldwide, there is room for discussion about the appropriate range of suprapancreatic D2 lymphadenectomy. Focusing on the posterior hepatic plexus (PHP), which is not well recognized, we developed a surgical technique of suprapancreatic D2 lymphadenectomy, which we have called PHP-D2, and its short-term and long-term efficacies were evaluated in comparison with non-PHP-D2. Methods: GC patients who underwent distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy between July 2006 and May 2013 were enrolled, from which patients who had peritoneal metastasis and/or were peritoneal cytology-positive during surgery were excluded. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Ninety-two patients (non-PHP-D2: 48, PHP-D2: 44) were enrolled. Shorter operation time (330 min vs 275 min, p < 0.0001) and less blood loss (290 mL vs 125 mL, p < 0.0001) were observed in PHP-D2, and no pancreatic fistulas were observed in PHP-D2. More lymph nodes of #11p (1 vs 1.5, p = 0.0328) and #12a lymph nodes (0 vs 1, p = 0.0034) were retrieved in PHP-D2, with no significant differences in #8a and #9 lymph nodes. Lymphatic recurrence was significantly less in PHP-D2 (p = 0.0166), and univariate and multivariate analyses showed that non-PHP-D2 was a significant risk factor for lymphatic recurrence (p = 0.0158), although there were no significant differences between non-PHP-D2 and PHP-D2 in 5-year overall survival and 5-year relapse-free survival. Conclusion: PHP-D2 was a safe and feasible procedure that had the potential to reduce lymphatic recurrence, and it can be a standard procedure of D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced GC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The number of positive lymph nodes, which was defined as “N stage”, is mostly used to predict the survival of D2-resected gastric cancer patients, not the location. A “central lymph node” (CnLN) was defined by Ikoma et al., included common hepatic, celiac and proximal splenic artery LNs. CnLNs located in the extraperigastric area are included in the D2 LN station for gastric cancer. We speculate that CnLNs can be regarded as a predictor of survival. Methods Eligible advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection and D2 lymph node dissection between 2004 and 2012 at our institution were identified. The frequency of CnLN metastases and risk factors affecting DFS were examined. Survival differences were assessed by log-rank tests and Kaplan–Meier curves. Results The study identified 1178 patients who underwent curative surgery or D2 or more extensive lymphadenectomy. A total of 342 patients had been proven to have CnLN metastasis. Larger tumor size (P

Liang Cai,1,* Ganlu Ouyang,2,* Xin Wang,2 Zhiping Li,3 Yali Shen2 1Lung Cancer Center, West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Yali ShenDepartment of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 of Wainan Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu 610041, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +86 2885422589Email sylprecious@163.comPurpose: Regional lymph node recurrence (RLNR) in gastric cancer is uncommon. We investigated the effects of radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy against limited RLNR and analyzed the regularity of regional lymph node recurrence and metastasis.Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 34 gastric cancer patients with limited RLNR after D2 lymphadenectomy between January 2012 and May 2018. All patients received systemic chemotherapy and local radiotherapy with median dose of 52.5 Gy (30– 66 Gy in fractions of 1.8– 3.0 Gy daily, five times weekly). All sites of recurrent and metastatic lymph nodes were collected and analyzed.Results: The median follow-up was 19 months (range 7– 60 months). After treatment, complete response and partial response were observed in 32.4% and 55.9% of patients, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 18 months and 13 months. On multivariate analysis, age (≤ 60 vs > 60) was associated with a significantly better OS (p = 0.025) and radiation dose (< 54 Gy vs ≥ 54 Gy) was considered as an independent prognostic factor for PFS (p = 0.000). During radiotherapy, three patients developed grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity, and no deaths were related to the treatments. The most commonly metastatic lymph nodes were the No. 4, No. 3, No. 6, No. 5, No. 7, No. 9, and No. 8 nodes; the recurrent lymph nodes were mainly located in the No. 16b, No. 16a, No. 9, No. 14, No. 7, No. 13, and No. 8 nodes.Conclusion: The selected gastric cancer patients with limited RLNR may benefit from radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy. High-dose radiotherapy (≥ 54 Gy) lead to better PFS and tend to extend OS. The major lymph node recurrence sites were in the gastric vascular region (especially No. 16a/b nodes).Keywords: gastric cancer, radiotherapy, regional lymph node, D2 lymphadenectomy, recurrence

BackgroundThe near-infrared/indocyanine green imaging fluorescence (NIR/ICG) technology is showing promising results in several fields of surgical oncology. The clinical value of NIR/ICG technology in the surgical treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is not clearly established.MethodsThis is the protocol of the “iGreenGO” (indocyanine Green Gastric Observation) Study, a national prospective multicenter study. Western patients who undergo curative-intent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for AGC constitute the study cohort. All the patients undergo preoperative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for submucosal peritumoral ICG injection at the most 20 h before surgery. Intraoperative endoscopic injection before starting surgical dissection is also allowed. The primary endpoint is the “change in the surgical conduct” (CSC), i.e., the need to perform further dissection after intraoperative NIR/ICG technology activation at the end of D2 lymphadenectomy. Secondary endpoints include the pattern of abdominal fluorescence distribution according to tumor and patient characteristics, the preoperative clinical variables potentially associated with CSC, and the incidence of stage migration due to NIR/ICG application.DiscussionThe iGreenGO Study is the first study to investigate the clinical role of NIR/ICG technology for the surgical treatment of AGC in a large cohort of Western patients. Results from the present study can further clarify the role of NIR/ICG technology in surgical lymphadenectomy for AGC.

Abstract Background Laparoscopic gastrectomy has been used as a superior alternative to open gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer. However, the application of laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. Results Between May 2016 and May 2018, twenty-five consecutive patients with gastric cancer underwent laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy: eighteen patients (72%) underwent distal gastrectomy, four patients (16%) underwent total gastrectomy, and three patients (12%) underwent proximal gastrectomy. The median number of lymph nodes retrieved was 18 (5–35). A positive proximal margin was detected in 2 patients (8%). The median operative time and amount of blood loss were 240 min (200–330) and 250 ml (200–450), respectively. Conversion to an open procedure was performed in seven patients (28%). The median hospital stay period was 8 days (6–30), and the median time to start oral fluids was 4 days (3–30). Postoperative complications were detected in 4 patients (16%). There were two cases of mortality (8%) in the postoperative period, and two patients required reoperation (8%). Conclusions Laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy can be carried out safely and in accordance with oncologic principles.

Introduction: Data on laparoscopic treatment of operable gastric cancer from India is sparse. This study aims to document outcomes of laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy in an Indian population. Materials and methods: Data of patients who underwent laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy for operable advanced gastric cancer between February 2012 and January 2017 were collected from electronic hospital records supplemented by telephonic interviews and analyzed. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis curves. Results: In total 121 patients were included. Conversion to open gastrectomy was 5.7%. One hundred and fourteen patients (73 laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy and 41 laparoscopic total gastrectomy) were included for analysis. D2 lymphadenectomy was done in all cases; mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 23.12 ± 9.14 (12–45). Major complications (Clavien‐Dindo Grade III and IV) was seen in 6.1% of cases with reoperation rate of 3.5% (4/114). Stage 3 disease was seen in 60.6% cases and stage 2 disease in 32.5%. Follow‐up data were available for 76.3% of patients with mean follow‐up of 29.5 months. Overall survival across all stages was 38.7 months. Five‐year disease‐free survival and overall survival were 36.7% and 55.9% respectively, across all stages. Conclusion: Laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy is safe, feasible with similar postoperative complications and comparable survival outcomes across all stages when compared to available literature on open gastrectomy cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: For gastric cancer (GC) with extensive lymph node metastasis (bulky N2 and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases), there is no standard therapy worldwide. In Japan, preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) followed by D2 gastrectomy plus para-aortic lymph node dissection (PAND) is considered the standard treatment for these patients. However, in China, the standard operation for GC patients with only bulky N2 metastases was D2 gastrectomy. Besides, after PCT, whether doing PAND improves survival or not is debatable for GC patients with para-aortic lymph node (PAN) metastases. Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate whether D2 lymphadenectomy alone is suitable for these patients after PCT. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on patients from our electronic medical record system. GC patients with bulky N2 and/or PAN metastases who underwent D2 lymphadenectomy alone after PCT were enrolled. The survival outcomes and chemotherapy responses were analyzed and compared with the results of the JCOG0405 study. Results: From May 2009 to December 2017, a total of 83 patients met all eligibility criteria and were enrolled. The median survival duration for all patients was 40.0 months. The 3-year and 5-year OS rates for all patients were 50.3% and 45.6%, respectively. For patients with only bulky N2 metastasis, the 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 77.1% and 71.6%, respectively, which were similar to the results of the JCOG0405 study (82.7% and 73.4%). For patients with only PAN metastases, the 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 50.0% and 50.0%, respectively, which seemed to be lower than those of the JCOG0405 study (64.3% and 57.1%). For patients with bulky N2 and PAN metastases, the 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 7.4% and 0.0%, respectively, which were lower than those of the JCOG0405 study (20.0% and 20.0%). Conclusion: The results of our study suggest that D2 lymphadenectomy alone is suitable for GC patients with only bulky N2 metastasis after PCT. However, D2 lymphadenectomy alone perhaps is not suitable for patients with bulky N2 and PAN metastases after PCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundFor gastric cancer (GC) with extensive lymph node metastasis (bulky N2 and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases), there is no standard therapy worldwide. In Japan, preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) followed by D2 gastrectomy plus para-aortic lymph node dissection (PAND) is considered the standard treatment for these patients. However, in China, the standard operation for GC patients with only bulky N2 metastases was D2 gastrectomy. Besides, after PCT, whether doing PAND improves survival or not is debatable for GC patients with para-aortic lymph node (PAN) metastases. Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate whether D2 lymphadenectomy alone is suitable for these patients after PCT.MethodsWe retrospectively collected data on patients from our electronic medical record system. GC patients with bulky N2 and/or PAN metastases who underwent D2 lymphadenectomy alone after PCT were enrolled. The survival outcomes and chemotherapy responses were analyzed and compared with the results of the JCOG0405 study.ResultsFrom May 2009 to December 2017, a total of 83 patients met all eligibility criteria and were enrolled. The median survival duration for all patients was 40.0 months. The 3-year and 5-year OS rates for all patients were 50.3% and 45.6%, respectively. For patients with only bulky N2 metastasis, the 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 77.1% and 71.6%, respectively, which were similar to the results of the JCOG0405 study (82.7% and 73.4%). For patients with only PAN metastases, the 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 50.0% and 50.0%, respectively, which seemed to be lower than those of the JCOG0405 study (64.3% and 57.1%). For patients with bulky N2 and PAN metastases, the 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 7.4% and 0.0%, respectively, which were lower than those of the JCOG0405 study (20.0% and 20.0%).ConclusionThe results of our study suggest that D2 lymphadenectomy alone is suitable for GC patients with only bulky N2 metastasis after PCT. However, D2 lymphadenectomy alone perhaps is not suitable for patients with bulky N2 and PAN metastases after PCT.

A robotic approach to abdominal surgery procedures may improve postoperative outcomes compared to either open or laparoscopic approaches. The role of robotics for gastric surgery, however, is still being evaluated. A retrospective review of the prospectively maintained database for robotic gastric surgery at University of Siena between 2011 and 2020 was conducted. Data regarding surgical procedures, early postoperative outcomes, and long-term follow-up were analyzed. 38 patients underwent robotic partial or total gastrectomy. Conversion to open occurred in two patients (5.2%) due to locally advanced disease as well as difficult identification of primary lesion. Postoperative morbidity was 13.1% while no postoperative mortality was registered. The mean length of operation was 358.6 (220–650) minutes and the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was 35.8 (range: 5–73). The median OS of all population was 70.9 months. The median 5-year OS for the patients with positive nodes was worse than that of patients without metastatic lymph nodes [51.4 months (95% CI 35.5–67.4) vs. 79.5 months (95% CI 67.1–91.8); p = 0.079]. The interesting results including postoperative morbidity as well as mortality rate, the surgical outcomes, and the 5-year OS, were to be acceptable considering the data recorded by previous studies on robotic gastrectomy. This study demonstrated that robotic gastrectomy is feasible and can be safely performed. However, further follow-up and randomized clinical trials are required to confirm the role of a robotic approach in gastric cancer surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine the effects of perioperative treatment of gastric cancer patients, we conducted an analysis with propensity score matched patient groups to determine the role of perioperative chemotherapy in patients after D2 lymphadenectomy.

Abstract The Japan Clinical Oncology Group has recently conducted large scale clinical trials with findings that have revealed pivotal strategies for the treatment of resectable gastric cancer surgery. These findings include the fact that D3 lymphadenectomy does not improve survival rates when compared to D2 lymphadenectomy, and it is not recommended for resectable gastric cancer. Also, a transhiatal approach is recommended, instead of the left thoraco-abdominal approach, for the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction or gastric cardia which has invaded ≤ 3 cm of the esophagus. Gastrectomy with splenectomy and bursectomy had been recommended as a part of the D2 lymphadenectomy. However, the results of the recent clinical trials revealed that splenectomy should be avoided in total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer and that bursectomy should be avoided in gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for resectable gastric cancer. Both splenectomy and bursectomy were found to be unable to improve survival, but instead increased operative morbidity. These trials revealed that the above-mentioned invasive and aggressive procedures did not provide sufficient survival benefits and that gastric cancer surgery may be trending from an “invasive to less invasive” and “aggressive to more conservative” approach.

Background: Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide, with an incidence of 6.72 per 100,000 people. Thirty-two percent of gastric cancer patients will live 5 years after diagnosis. Single-site metastasis is noted in 26% of patients with gastric cancer, most commonly in the liver (48%), peritoneum (32%), lung (15%), and bone (12%). Here, a case is presented in which a single skeletal muscle metastasis appeared after appropriate resection and treatment. Case presentation: A 63-year-old man underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a multivisceral en bloc R0 resection. Final pathology showed no evidence of lymph node metastasis with 31 negative lymph nodes. Four months postoperatively, the patient was found to have a rapidly growing biopsy-proven extremity soft tissue gastric metastasis within the brachioradialis muscle. He subsequently underwent metastasectomy and immunotherapy. Conclusion: This case is a rare example of an isolated extremity metastasis of gastric adenocarcinoma in the setting of an R0 resection of the primary tumor and negative nodal disease on final pathology, suggestive of hematogenous spread. We review the biology, workup, and management of gastric cancer and highlight new advancements in the treatment of this aggressive cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To qualify surgeons to participate in a randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open distal D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Summary of Background Data: No studies have sought to qualify surgeons for a randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study evaluating unedited videos of laparoscopic and open D2 gastrectomy performed by 27 surgeons. Surgeons performed 3 of each laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomies with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. Five peers reviewed each unedited video using a video assessment form. Based on experts' review of videos, a separate review committee decided surgeons as "Qualified" or "Not-qualified." Results: Twelve surgeons (44.4%) were qualified on initial evaluation whereas the other 15 surgeons were not. Another 9 surgeons were finally qualified after re-evaluation. The median score for Qualified was significantly higher than Not-qualified (P < 0.001). Significant differences between Qualified and Not-qualified were noted both in operation type and in all evaluation area of surgical skill, perigastric, and extra-perigastric lymphadenectomy, although the inter-rater variability of the assessment score was low (kappa - 0.285). However, Not-qualified surgeons' scores improved upon re-evaluation of resubmitted videos. When compared laparoscopy with open surgery, median scores were similar between the 2 groups (P - 0.680). However, open gastrectomy scores for surgical skills were significantly higher than for laparoscopic surgery (P - 0.016). Conclusions: Our surgeon quality control study for gastrectomy represents a milestone in surgical standardization for surgical clinical trials. Our methods could also serve as a system for educating surgeons and assessing surgical proficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The number of positive lymph nodes, which was defined as "N stage", is mostly used to predict the survival of D2-resected gastric cancer patients, not the location. A "central lymph node" (CnLN) was defined by Ikoma et al., included common hepatic, celiac and proximal splenic artery LNs. CnLNs located in the extraperigastric area are included in the D2 LN station for gastric cancer. We speculate that CnLNs can be regarded as a predictor of survival.Methods: Eligible advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection and D2 lymph node dissection between 2004 and 2012 at our institution were identified. The frequency of CnLN metastases and risk factors affecting DFS were examined. Survival differences were assessed by log-rank tests and Kaplan-Meier curves.Results: The study identified 1178 patients who underwent curative surgery or D2 or more extensive lymphadenectomy. A total of 342 patients had been proven to have CnLN metastasis. Larger tumor size (P < 0.001), more frequent lymphatic vessel invasion (P < 0.001), signet ring cell histology (P = 0.014), and more advanced pathological T stage (P = 0.013) were significantly related to CnLNs metastasis. The patients with CnLN metastasis had a poor prognosis (HR for DFS of 1.366, 95%CI = 1.138-1.640, P = 0.001). For the pN2/3 patients, CnLN metastasis was associated with shorter 5-year DFS (for pN2 patients: 25.9% vs 39.3%, P = 0.017; for pN3 patients: 11.5% vs 23.4%, P = 0.005).Conclusion: Gastric cancer patients with CnLN metastasis who underwent D2 resection had a poor prognosis. With the same N stage, the patients with positive CnLNs had shorter survival. CnLNs metastasis could be a supplement to N stage and a predictor of survival in gastric cancer patients. Large sample, multicenter, randomized clinical trials are still needed in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose/Aim: In the past few decades some researchers have questioned whether bursectomy for gastric cancer is essential from an oncological point of view and no consistent recommendations have been proposed. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to investigate the oncologic effectiveness and safety of bursectomy for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer patients. Materials and Methods: We planned and performed this systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement and Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention. Results: Overall, four studies with a total of 1,340 patients met inclusion criteria. The pooled hazard ratio for overall survival between the bursectomy versus nonbursectomy groups was [HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.66–1.11, p =.252]. Interestingly, the pooled HR between the two groups in serosa-positive cases subgroup, showed a significant improvement of overall survival rate in favor of bursectomy [HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.73–0.99, p

Abstract Background Although radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection has become the standard surgical approach for locally advanced gastric cancer, patients still have a poor prognosis after operation. Previously, we proposed laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastrium excision [D2 + CME]) as an optimized surgical procedure for locally advanced gastric cancer. By dissection along the boundary of the mesogastrium, D2 + CME resected proximal segments of the dorsal mesogastrium completely with less blood loss, and it improved the short-term surgical outcome. However, the oncologic therapeutic effect of D2 + CME has not yet been confirmed. Methods/design A single-center, prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 + CME versus conventional D2 was conducted for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer at Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China. In total, 336 patients who met the following eligibly criteria were included and were randomized to receive either the D2 + CME or D2 procedure: (1) pathologically proven adenocarcinoma; (2) 18 to 75 years old; cT2–4, N0–3, M0 at preoperative evaluation; (3) expected curative resection via laparoscopic distal gastrectomy; (4) no history of other cancer, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy; (5) no history of upper abdominal operation; and (6) perioperative American Society of Anesthesiologists class I, II, or III. The primary endpoint is 3 years of disease-free survival. The secondary endpoints are overall survival, recurrence pattern, mortality, morbidity, postoperative recovery course, and other parameters. Discussion Previous studies have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of D2 + CME for locally advanced gastric cancer; however, there is still a lack of evidence to support its therapeutic effect. Thus, we performed this randomized trial to investigate whether D2 + CME can improve oncologic outcomes of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. The findings from this trial may potentially optimize the surgical procedure and may improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01978444. Registered on October 31, 2013.

Objective: Microscopic residual tumor (R1 resection) may have a significant negative impact on prognosis of patients with adenocarcinoma of stomach and esophagogastric junction. Results of R1 resection on survival and recurrence patterns have not yet been thoroughly investigated in Thailand. The aim of this study was to study the oncological outcomes of R1 resection after curative intended surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent curative intended surgery from 2005 to 2013 at Siriraj Hospital. Results: 162 patients underwent curative intended gastrectomy with radical lymphadenectomy. 122 (75.3%) patients received R0 resection (non-residual group), 40 (24.7%) patients had microscopic residual tumor (residual group). Microscopic residual tumor was associated with tumor size (p=0.008), tumor extension (p=0.028), pT-stage (p=0.012), pN-stage (p=0.012), and AJCC/TNM stage (p

Background: In locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), perioperative chemotherapy has shown to improve the survival to a larger extent compared to surgery alone. In India, the treatment followed for gastric carcinoma widely varies based on the type of health-care provider and treatment access. There is a paucity of data on the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival among LAGC patients in the Indian context. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapies among LAGC patients. Subjects and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study involving clinical record review of LAGC patients enrolled between 2015 and 2017 from four tertiary cancer centers in South India. The date for the following events, namely diagnosis, recurrence, death, and last day of visit, was extracted in a mobile-based open-access tool. The median duration of OS and DFS between the neoadjuvant and adjuvant groups was compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results: Of the 137 patients, 70 (51%) had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and 67 (49%) had adjuvant chemotherapy following the surgery. The mean (standard deviation) age of participants was 55.4 (11.4) years. Seventy-eight percent of the patients were diagnosed at Stage 3 or 4. Regional lymph nodes were involved in 83.9%. The median duration of follow-up was 15 months. The OS in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant groups was 18.6 months and 8.3 months, respectively. Nonregional lymph node involvement and adjacent organ involvement had independently increased the risk of death. Conclusion: Among LAGC patients, the neoadjuvant chemotherapy indicated a better median and DFS compared to the adjuvant group. However, these findings were statistically not significant. The current study has contributed an important finding to the existing evidences of clinical practice in an Indian setting. Further large-scale studies are required to validate the promising trend of using neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LAGC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]