Search

Objective Right ventricular heart failure (RVHF) is a critical complication in patients with respiratory failure, particularly among those who transitioned to lung transplantation using venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). In these patients, both cardiac and respiratory functions are supported using venoarterial or venoarterial-venous ECMO. However, these modalities increase the risk of device-related complications, such as thromboembolism, bleeding, and limb ischemia, and they may disturb early rehabilitation. Due to these limitations, a right ventricular assist device with an oxygenator (Oxy-RVAD) using ECMO may be considered for patients with RVHF with VV ECMO. Design A retrospective case series and literature review. Setting A single tertiary care university hospital. Participants The study comprised lung transplantation candidates on ECMO bridging who developed right-sided heart failure. Interventions An RVAD with ECMO. Measurements and Main Results Of eight patients who underwent the study protocol, seven were bridged successfully to lung transplantation (BTT), and all patients with BTT were discharged, with a 30-day survival rate of 100% (7/7 patients). The 180-day survival rate was 85% (6/7 patients). Conclusions The study suggested that Oxy-RVAD using ECMO may be a viable option for bridging patients with RVHF to lung transplantation. Trial Registration Retrospectively registered.

Central venous blood gas (cVBG) values are correlated with arterial blood gas (ABG) values. However, the substitution of cVBG values for ABG values in critically ill patients remains uninvestigated. Thus, we investigated the reliability between cVBG and ABG values and sought to define the conditions that could improve the reliability of cVBG values as a substitute.We conducted a prospective comparison of 292 sets of cVBG values and ABG values from 82 subjects admitted to the medical ICU between October 2017-July 2018. Paired cVBG and ABG samples were collected daily during the first 5 d of ICU treatment and on days 8, 15, 22, and 29. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA) were obtained.The ICC between ABG and cVBG was 0.626 for pH, 0.696 for PABG and cVBG values showed clinically acceptable agreements and improved reliability in mechanically ventilated subjects with ScvO

Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality in patients with neutropenia; however, data on whether neutropenic sepsis is associated with distinct clinical characteristics and outcomes are limited. Thus, this study was designed to clarify the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with neutropenic sepsis compared with those of patients without neutropenic sepsis diagnosed based on the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock criteria.We analyzed data from the Korean Sepsis Alliance, a nationwide prospective multicenter cohort study evaluating the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with sepsis from September 2019 to February 2020. Eligible patients were divided into the neutropenic (absolute neutrophil count of less than 1,500/mL) and non- neutropenic groups. The characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups.During the study period, 2,074 patients were enrolled from 16 tertiary referral or university-affiliated hospitals. Of them, 218 (10.5%) had neutropenia. The neutropenia group was younger and had a lower proportion of patients with chronic diseases compared with the non-neutropenia group. However, solid tumors (50.0% vs. 34.1%; P 0.001) and hematological malignancies (40.8% vs. 3.8%; P 0.001) were more common in the neutropenia group. The neutropenia group had a higher incidence of septic shock (43.6% vs. 22.9%; P 0.001) and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (7 vs. 5; P 0.001) than the nonneutropenia group. However, no significant differences in microbiologically confirmed infections and its pathogen distribution and the incidence of multidrug resistance were observed between the two groups. The neutropenic group had a higher hospital mortality than the non-neutropenic group (42.2% vs. 26.3%; P 0.001), and the Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated a significant difference in survival within 1 week after diagnosing sepsis (log-rank test, P = 0.002). The incidence of adverse events during intensive care unit admission was not different between the two groups. Among hospital survivors, the neutropenic group was more frequently discharged to home (72.2% vs. 57.8%; P = 0.002).Neutropenic sepsis is associated with a higher-grade organ dysfunction during the diagnosis of sepsis and higher mortality without difference in the pathogen isolated.

Airway complications may occur after lung transplantation and are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. We investigated the incidence, risk factors, and clinical characteristics of these complications. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 137 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2008 and 2021. The median follow-up period was 20 months. Of the 137 patients, 30 (21.9%) had postoperative airway complications, of which 2 had two different types of airway complications. The most common airway complication was bronchial stenosis, affecting 23 patients (16.8%). Multivariable Cox analysis revealed that a recipient’s body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.663; p = 0.013) was a significant independent risk factor for airway complications, as was postoperative treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO; HR, 3.340; p = 0.034). Of the 30 patients who had airway complications, 21 (70.0%) were treated with bronchoscopic intervention. Survival rates did not differ significantly between patients with and without airway complications. Thus, our study revealed that one fifth of patients who underwent lung transplantation experienced airway complications during the follow-up period. Obesity and receiving postoperative ECMO are risk factors for airway complications, and close monitoring is warranted in such cases.

Although sepsis is heterogeneous, data on sepsis patients with normal lactate levels are very limited. We explored whether hypotension at the time of sepsis recognition (i.e., time zero) was significant in terms of survival when lactate levels were normal in sepsis patients.This was a prospective multicenter observational study conducted in 19 hospitals (20 intensive care units [ICUs]). Adult sepsis patients with normal lactate levels (≤2 mmol/L) admitted to ICUs were divided by the mean arterial pressure (MAP) at time zero into hypotensive (65 mmHg) and non-hypotensive groups (≥65 mmHg).Of 2,032 patients with sepsis (not septic shock), 617 with normal lactate levels were included in the analysis. The hypotensive group (n = 237) was characterized by higher rates of abdominal or urinary infections, and bacteremia, while the non-hypotensive group (n = 380) was characterized by higher rates of pulmonary infections and systemic inflammatory response. However, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (excluding the cardiovascular score) were not different between the groups. During sepsis resuscitation, the rates of antibiotic administration within 1, 3, and 6 h of time zero were higher in the hypotensive than non-hypotensive group (P0.05 for all time points), and the amounts of pre-ICU fluids given were also higher in the hypotensive group. However, despite a higher rate of vasopressor use in the hypotensive group, ICU and in-hospital mortality rates were not different between the groups (12.7% vs. 13.9%, P = 0.648; 19.4% vs. 22.4%, P = 0.382, respectively). In multivariable analysis, the use of appropriate antibiotics and early lactate measurement were significant risk factors for in-hospital mortality.In sepsis patients with normal lactate levels, neither hypotension nor vasopressor use adversely impacted the hospital outcome. Our results emphasize the importance of early interventions and appropriate use of antibiotics regardless of whether a patient is or is not hypotensive.

Airway complications still occur after lung transplantation and are associated with considerable rates of morbidity and mortality. We investigated the incidence, risk factors, and clinical characteristics of these complications. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 137 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2008 and 2021. The median follow-up period was 20 months. Of the 137 patients, 30 (21.9%) had postoperative airway complications, out of which 2 had two different types of airway complications. The most common airway complication was bronchial stenosis, affecting 23 patients (16.8%). Multivariable Cox analysis revealed that a transplant recipient’s body mass index measuring ≥25 kg/m2 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.663; p = 0.013) was a significant independent risk factor for airway complications, as was postoperative treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO; HR, 3.340; p = 0.034). Of the 30 patients who had airway complications, 21 (70.0%) were treated with bronchoscopic intervention. Rates of survival did not differ significantly between patients with and without airway complications. Thus, our study revealed that one fifth of patients who underwent lung transplantation experienced airway complications during the follow-up period. Obesity and receiving postoperative ECMO are risk factors for airway complications, and close monitoring is warranted in such cases.

Background: Sepsis is the most common cause of death in hospitals, and intra-abdominal infection (IAI) accounts for a large portion of the causes of sepsis. We investigated the clinical outcomes and factors influencing mortality of patients with sepsis due to IAI.Methods: This post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study included 2,126 patients with sepsis who visited 16 tertiary care hospitals in Korea (September 2019–February 2020). The analysis included 219 patients aged > 19 years who were admitted to intensive care units owing to sepsis caused by IAI.Results: The incidence of septic shock was 47% and was significantly higher in the non-survivor group (58.7% vs 42.3%, p=0.028). The overall 28-day mortality was 28.8%. In multivariate logistic regression, after adjusting for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, and lactic acid, only coagulatory dysfunction (p=0.001, odds ratio: 2.78 [1.47­–5.23]) was independently associated, and after adjusting for each risk factor, only simplified acute physiology score III (p=0.014) and continuous renal replacement therapy (pConclusions: Considering the independent risk factors influencing 28-day mortality, more intensive care may be needed for patients with coagulopathy than for patients with other organ dysfunctions caused by IAI.

Sepsis is the most common cause of death in hospitals, and intra-abdominal infection (IAI) accounts for a large portion of the causes of sepsis. We investigated the clinical outcomes and factors influencing mortality of patients with sepsis due to IAI.This post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study included 2126 patients with sepsis who visited 16 tertiary care hospitals in Korea (September 2019-February 2020). The analysis included 219 patients aged 19 years who were admitted to intensive care units owing to sepsis caused by IAI.The incidence of septic shock was 47% and was significantly higher in the non-survivor group (58.7% vs 42.3%, p = 0.028). The overall 28-day mortality was 28.8%. In multivariable logistic regression, after adjusting for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and lactic acid, only coagulation dysfunction (odds ratio: 2.78 [1.47-5.23], p = 0.001) was independently associated, and after adjusting for each risk factor, only simplified acute physiology score III (SAPS 3) (p 0.001) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (p 0.001) were independently associated with higher 28-day mortality.The SAPS 3 score and acute kidney injury with CRRT were independently associated with increased 28-day mortality. Additional support may be needed in patients with coagulopathy than in those with other organ dysfunctions due to IAI because patients with coagulopathy had worse prognosis.

OBJECTIVES To investigate the impact of normothermia on compliance with sepsis bundles and in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis who present to emergency departments. DESIGN Retrospective multicenter observational study. PATIENTS Nineteen university-affiliated hospitals of the Korean Sepsis Alliance participated in this study. Data were collected regarding patients who visited emergency departments for sepsis during the 1-month period. The patients were divided into three groups based on their body temperature at the time of triage in the emergency department (i.e., hypothermia [ 38°C]). INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Of 64,021 patients who visited emergency departments, 689 with community-acquired sepsis were analyzed (182 hyperthermic, 420 normothermic, and 87 hypothermic patients). The rate of compliance with the total hour-1 bundle was lowest in the normothermia group (6.0% vs 9.3% in hyperthermia vs 13.8% in hypothermia group; p = 0.032), the rate for lactate measurement was lowest in the normothermia group (62.1% vs 73.1% vs 75.9%; p = 0.005), and the blood culture rate was significantly lower in the normothermia than in the hyperthermia group (p < 0.001). The in-hospital mortality rates in the hyperthermia, normothermia, and hypothermia groups were 8.5%, 20.6%, and 30.8%, respectively (p < 0.001), but there was no significant association between compliance with sepsis bundles and in-hospital mortality. However, in a multivariate analysis, compared with hyperthermia, normothermia was significantly associated with an increased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 2.472; 95% CI, 1.005-6.080). This association remained significant even after stratifying patients by median lactate level. CONCLUSIONS Normothermia at emergency department triage was significantly associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality and a lower rate of compliance with the sepsis bundle. Despite several limitations, our findings suggest a need for new strategies to improve sepsis outcomes in this group of patients.

Right heart decompensation is a fatal complication in patients with respiratory failure, particularly in those transitioned to lung transplantation using veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO). In these patients, veno-arterial (V-A ECMO) or veno-arterialvenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-AV ECMO) is used to support both cardiac and respiratory function. However, these processes may increase the risk of device-related complications such as bleeding, thromboembolism, and limb ischemia. In the present case, a 64-year-old male patient with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis developed respiratory failure and commenced treatment with V-V ECMO as a bridge to lung transplantation. Unfortunately, the patient developed right heart decompensation and required both cardiac and respiratory support during treatment with V-V ECMO. Instead of adding arterial cannulation, he was switched to a novel configuration, a right ventricular assist device with an oxygenator (Oxy- RVAD) using ECMO, with drainage cannulation from the femoral vein and return cannulation to the main pulmonary artery. The patient was successfully bridged to lung transplantation without serious complications after 10 days of Oxy-RVAD support. To the best of our knowledge, this is an extreme rare and challenging case of Oxy-RVAD using ECMO in a patient successfully bridged to lung transplantation.

An outbreak of fatal humidifier disinfectant lung injuries (HDLI) occurred in Korea. Human studies on mechanisms underlying HDLI have yet to be conducted. This study aimed to investigate methylation changes and their potential role in HDLI after exposure to HDs containing polyhexamethylene guanidine-phosphate. DNA methylation analysis was performed in blood samples from 10 children with HDLI and 10 healthy children using Infinium Human MethylationEPIC BeadChip. Transcriptome analysis was performed using lung tissues from 5 children with HDLI and 5 controls. Compared to healthy controls, 92 hypo-methylated and 79 hyper-methylated CpG sites were identified in children with HDLI at the statistical significance level of |Δβ|>0.2 and p

The demand for lung transplants continues to increase in Korea, and donor shortages and waitlist mortality are critical issues. This study aimed to evaluate the factors that affect waitlist outcomes from the time of registration for lung transplantation in Korea.Data were obtained from the Korean Network for Organ Sharing for lung-only registrations between September 7, 2009, and December 31, 2020. Post-registration outcomes were evaluated according to the lung disease category, blood group, and age.Among the 1,671 registered patients, 49.1% had idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (group C), 37.0% had acute respiratory distress syndrome and other interstitial lung diseases (group D), 7.2% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (group A), and 6.6% had primary pulmonary hypertension (group B). Approximately half of the patients (46.1%) were transplanted within 1 year of registration, while 31.8% died without receiving a lung transplant within 1 year of registration. Data from 1,611 patients were used to analyze 1-year post-registration outcomes, which were classified as transplanted (46.1%, n = 743), still awaiting (21.1%, n = 340), removed (0.9%, n = 15), and death on waitlist (31.8%, n = 513). No significant difference was found in the transplantation rate according to the year of registration. However, significant differences occurred between the waitlist mortality rates (Waitlist mortality is still higher in Korea than in other countries. Future revisions to the lung allocation system should take into consideration the high waitlist mortality and donor shortages.

Background/Aims: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at high risk for developing pressure injuries, which can cause severe complications and even increase the mortality risk. Therefore, prevention of pressure injuries is most important. In this study, we investigated the risk factors of pressure injury development in patients admitted to the ICU.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients ages > 18 years admitted to the medical ICU in a tertiary hospital between January and December 2019. We collected patient baseline characteristics, medications received, mechanical ventilation or hemodialysis use, laboratory findings, and date of pressure injury onset and characteristics.Results: We analyzed 666 patients who did not have pressure injuries at ICU admission. Pressure injuries developed in 102 patients (15%). The risk of pressure injury development increased as the administration days for neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs; odds ratio [OR], 1.138; p = 0.019) and opioids (OR, 1.084; p = 0.028) increased, and if the patient had problem with friction and shear (OR, 2.203; p = 0.011).Conclusions: The prolonged use of NMBAs and opioids can increase the risk of pressure injury development. Because these medications are associated with immobilization, using both should be minimized and patient early mobilization should be promoted. Among the Braden subscales, “friction and shear” was associated with the development of pressure injuries in ICU patients.

Background It is unclear whether the administration of antibiotics within 1 hour could improve patient outcomes in sepsis, and whether the association of time to antibiotics administration and clinical outcomes are different for sepsis and septic shock. Methods This study analyzed prospectively collected data from an ongoing multicenter cohort of patients with sepsis identified in the emergency department. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were compared for in-hospital mortality of patients who had received antibiotics within 1 h to that of those who did not. Spline regression models were used to assess the association of time-to-antibiotics as continuous variables and increasing risk of in-hospital mortality. The differences in the association between time-to-antibiotics and in-hospital mortality were assessed according to the presence of septic shock. Results Overall, 3,035 patients were included in the analysis. Among them, 601 (19.8%) presented with septic shock, and 774 (25.5%) died. The adjusted OR for in-hospital mortality of patients whose time-to-antibiotics was within 1 h was 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61–0.99; p=0.046). The adjusted OR for in-hospital mortality was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.44–0.99; p=0.049) and statistically significant in patients with septic shock, whereas it was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.64–1.15; p=0.300) in patients with sepsis but without shock. Among patients who received antibiotics within 3 h, those with septic shock showed 35% (p=0.042) increased risk of mortality for every 1-h delay in antibiotics, but no such trend was observed in patients without shock. Conclusion Timely administration of antibiotics improved outcomes in patients with septic shock; however, the association between early antibiotic administration and outcome was not as clear in patients with sepsis without shock.

OBJECTIVES To investigate whether administration of a vasopressor within 1 hour of first fluid loading affected mortality and organ dysfunction in septic shock patients. DESIGN Prospective, multicenter, observational study. SETTING Sixteen tertiary or university hospitals in the Republic of Korea. PATIENTS Patients with septic shock (n = 415) were classified into early and late groups according to whether the vasopressor was initiated within 1 hour of the first resuscitative fluid load. Early (n = 149) patients were 1:1 propensity matched to late (n = 149) patients. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS The median time from the initial fluid bolus to vasopressor was shorter in the early group (0.3 vs 2.3 hr). There was no significant difference in the fluid bolus volume within 6 hours (33.2 vs 35.9 mL/kg) between the groups. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and lactate level on day 3 in the ICU were significantly higher in the early group than that in the late group (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, 9.2 vs 7.7; lactate level, 2.8 vs 1.7 mmol/L). In multivariate Cox regression analyses, early vasopressor use was associated with a significant increase in the risk of 28-day mortality (hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.26-2.65). CONCLUSIONS Vasopressor initiation within 1 hour of fluid loading was associated with higher 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock.

OBJECTIVES Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome or state of increased vulnerability to poor resolution of homoeostasis following a stressor event. Frailty is common in patients with sepsis. Sepsis and frailty are both associated with older age and chronic medical conditions. However, there is limited evidence about the direct association between frailty and sepsis. The aim of this study is to determine the association between preexisting clinical frailty and clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis. DESIGN A nationwide propensity score-matched cohort study analyzing data prospectively collected between September 2019 and February 2020. SETTING Nineteen tertiary or university-affiliated hospitals in South Korea. PATIENTS Adult patients who were diagnosed with sepsis. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Frailty status was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale. All patients were classified as "frail" (Clinical Frailty Scale score, 5-9) or "nonfrail" (Clinical Frailty Scale score, 1-4). Propensity score matching identified comparable nonfrail patients. The primary outcome was inhospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between frailty and inhospital mortality. The propensity score-matched cohort comprised 468 nonfrail patients and 468 frail patients; all covariate imbalances were alleviated. In the matched cohort (mean age, 69 ± 14 yr), 27.2% had septic shock at presentation. Inhospital mortality was 34.2% in the frail group and 26.9% in the nonfrail group (p = 0.019). The adjusted odds ratio for inhospital mortality in the frail group compared with the nonfrail group was 2.00 (95% CI, 1.39-2.89; p < 0.001). Among the patients who survived to discharge, the frail group was less likely to be discharged home compared with the nonfrail group, 64.0% versus 81.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In patients with sepsis, preexisting clinical frailty is associated with worse clinical outcomes than that in nonfrail patients, including inhospital mortality and discharge to home.

Background: Hospitalized patients can develop septic shock at any time. Therefore, it is important to identify septic patients in hospital wards and rapidly perform the optimal treatment. Although the sepsis bundle has already been reported to improve survival rates, the controversy over evidence of the effect of in-hospital sepsis continues to exist. We aimed to estimate the outcomes and bundle compliance of patients with septic shock in hospital wards managed through the rapid response system (RRS). Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 976 patients with septic shock managed through the RRS at an academic, tertiary care hospital in Korea from 2008 to 2017. Results: Of the 976 enrolled patients, the compliance of each sepsis bundle was high (80.8–100.0%), but the overall success rate of the bundle was low (58.3%). The compliance rate for achieving the overall sepsis bundle increased from 26.5% to 70.0%, and the 28-day mortality continuously decreased from 50% to 32.1% over 10 years. We analyzed the two groups according to whether they completed the overall sepsis bundle or not. Of the 976 enrolled patients, 569 (58.3%) sepsis bundles were completed, whereas 407 (41.7%) were incomplete. The complete bundle group showed lower 28-day mortality than the incomplete bundle group (37.1% vs. 53.6%, p &lt, 0.001). In the multivariate multiple logistic regression model, the 28-day mortality was significantly associated with the complete bundle (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.61, 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.40–0.91, p = 0.017). The obtaining of blood cultures (adjusted OR, 0.45, 95% CI, 0.33–0.63, p &lt, 0.001) and lactate re-measurement (adjusted OR, 0.69, 95% CI, 0.50–0.95, p = 0.024) in each component of the sepsis bundle were associated with the 28-day mortality. Conclusions: The rapid response system provides improving sepsis bundle compliances and survival in patients with septic shock in hospital wards.

Background: Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) is a protein that exhibits dual functionality – as an intracellular enzyme which regulates nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide metabolism and as an extracellular protein (eNAMPT) secreted into the blood and functions as a cytokine regulator of innate immunity by activating NF-κB via binding to Toll-Like receptor 4. In limited preclinical and clinical studies, eNAMPT was implicated in the pathobiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) suggesting that eNAMPT could be a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of circulating eNAMPT levels to serve as a biomarker in an expanded cohort of patients with ARDS and ARDS-predisposing conditions such as acute pancreatitis, sepsis, and trauma when compared to controls. Methods: 795 patients and 179 healthy controls were included in the discovery and validation cohorts. Plasma and serum eNAMPT levels were quantified using one of two complementary Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assays. After log base 2 variance stabilizing transformation of plasma/serum eNAMPT measurements, differences between healthy controls and each disease cohort were compared using linear regression or generalized estimating equation (GEE) model where applicable. Complementary analyses included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, and the area under the receiver operating curve. Results: Compared to controls, circulating eNAMPT levels were significantly higher in patients with acute pancreatitis, with sepsis, with trauma, and with ARDS (all pConclusions: Circulating eNAMPT levels are a potential novel diagnostic biomarker in the critically ill with acute pancreatitis, sepsis, trauma, and/or ARDS.

Background Hospitalized patients can develop septic shock at any time. Therefore, it is important to identify septic patients in hospital wards and rapidly perform the optimal treatment. Although the sepsis bundle has already been reported to improve survival rates, the controversy over evidence of the effect of in-hospital sepsis continues to exist. We aimed to estimate the outcomes and bundle compliance of patients with septic shock in hospital wards managed through the rapid response system (RRS). Methods Retrospective cohort study of 976 patients with septic shock managed through the RRS at an academic, tertiary care hospital in South Korea from 2008 to 2017. Results Of the 976 enrolled patients, the compliance of each sepsis bundle was high (80.8–100.0%), but the overall success rate of the bundle was low (58.3%). The compliance rate for achieving the overall sepsis bundle increased from 26.5–70.0%, and the 28-day mortality continuously decreased from 50–32.1% over 10 years. We analyzed the two groups according to whether they completed the overall sepsis bundle or not. Of the 976 enrolled patients, 569 (58.3%) sepsis bundles were completed, whereas 407 (41.7%) were incomplete. The complete bundle group showed lower 28-day mortality than the incomplete bundle group (37.1% vs. 53.6%, p

Background Mortality rates associated with sepsis have increased progressively in Korea, but domestic epidemiologic data remain limited. The objective of this study was to investigate the characteristics, management and clinical outcomes of sepsis patients in Korea. Methods This study is a multicenter retrospective cohort study. A total of 64,021 adult patients who visited an emergency department (ED) within one of the 19 participating hospitals during a 1-month period were screened for eligibility. Among these, patients diagnosed with sepsis based on the third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) were included in the study. Results Using the Sepsis-3 criteria, 977 sepsis patients were identified, among which 36.5% presented with septic shock. The respiratory system (61.8%) was the most common site of infection. The pathogen involved was identified in 444 patients (45.5%) and multi-drug resistance (MDR) pathogens were isolated in 171 patients. Empiric antibiotic therapy was appropriate in 68.6% of patients, but the appropriateness was significantly reduced in infections associated with MDR pathogens as compared with non-MDR pathogens (58.8% vs. 76.0%, P

Background Although extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used for the treatment of acute high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), there are limited reports which focus on this approach. Herein, we described our experience with ECMO in patients with acute high-risk PE. Methods We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients diagnosed with acute high-risk PE and treated with ECMO between January 2014 and December 2018. Results Among 16 patients included, median age was 51 years (interquartile range [IQR], 38 to 71 years) and six (37.5%) were male. Cardiac arrest was occurred in 12 (75.0%) including two cases of out-of-hospital arrest. All patients underwent veno-arterial ECMO and median ECMO duration was 1.5 days (IQR, 0.0 to 4.5 days). Systemic thrombolysis and surgical embolectomy were performed in seven (43.8%) and nine (56.3%) patients, respectively including three patients (18.8%) received both treatments. Overall 30-day mortality rate was 43.8% (95% confidence interval, 23.1% to 66.8%) and 30-day mortality rates according to the treatment groups were ECMO alone (33.3%, n=3), ECMO with thrombolysis (50.0%, n=4) and ECMO with embolectomy (44.4%, n=9). Conclusions Despite the vigorous treatment efforts, patients with acute high-risk PE were related to substantial morbidity and mortality. We report our experience of ECMO as rescue therapy for refractory shock or cardiac arrest in patients with PE.

Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography reduced mortality in selected high risk patients. However, the use of chest radiography for lung cancer screening in Asian populations is still controversial. We investigated the effectiveness of chest radiographic surveillance using a nationwide health service data in South Korea.Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service examinee cohort of 2004 to 2013 were examined, and 63,228 patients with lung cancer were identified, 38,494 (57%) of whom underwent chest radiography screening. The others did not undergo lung cancer screening and were considered as a control group. Clinical data including age, smoking, screening intervals, lung cancer stages, treatments, and survival were collected. Survival gain from surveillance after adjustment for lead-time bias based on the sojourn time was calculated. Cox-proportional hazard analyses were performed to evaluate the effectiveness of screening and to determine the appropriate screening interval for chest radiography surveillance.Early lung cancer was found in 38% of patients receiving chest radiography versus 26% of those without surveillance. A patient age of more than 65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.53; 95% confidence limits [CL], 1.50-1.56), male (HR, 1.66; 95% CL, 1.62-1.70), and high lung cancer stages at the time of diagnosis were independent factors associated with mortality (each, P 0.001). Chest radiography surveillance was a factor for decreasing mortality in female (HR, 0.81; 95% CL, 0.77-0.84, P 0.001), with mortality reduction of 10% at the 3- and 5-year survival time-points. In female patients, chest radiography surveillance at intervals of less than 3 years was an independent predictor of improved survival.Surveillance chest radiography increased survival in a female screened population in South Korea. Chest radiography intervals of less than 3 years may help to detect lung cancer in female patients.

Although guidelines have recommended that patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) should be managed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT), there is a lack of clinical data indicating that the MDT improves CTEPH management.The study aimed to identify the effect of an MDT on CTEPH management.We divided the study period into pre-MDT and post-MDT eras and compared the implementation rates of major diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.Of 116 patients with CTEPH, 42 (36.2%) were diagnosed in the post-MDT era. The implementation rates of right heart catheterization (10.8% vs. 97.6%, p0.001) and pulmonary endarterectomy (32.4% vs. 59.5%, p0.005) were significantly increased in the post-MDT era. Balloon pulmonary angioplasty was not performed in the pre-MDT era but was performed in the post-MDT era.The MDT appears to be associated with improved CTEPH management.

Purpose Monocyte distribution width (MDW) has been suggested as an early biomarker of sepsis, but few studies have compared MDW with conventional biomarkers, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT). This study evaluated MDW as a biomarker for sepsis and compared it with CRP and PCT. Materials and methods Patients aged 18–80 years who visited the emergency department were screened and prospectively enrolled in a tertiary medical center. Complete blood count, MDW, CRP, and PCT were examined. Diagnostic performance for sepsis was tested using the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, and specificity. Results In total, 665 patients were screened, and 549 patients with valid laboratory test results were included in the analysis. The patients were categorized into three groups according to the Sepsis-3 criteria: non-infection, infection, and sepsis. MDW showed the highest value in the sepsis group (median [interquartile range], 24.0 [20.8–27.8]). The AUC values for MDW, CRP, PCT, and white blood cells for predicting sepsis were 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67–0.75), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71–0.78], 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72–0.79, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.57–0.65), respectively. With the optimal cutoff value of the cohort, the sensitivity was 83.0% for MDW (cutoff, 19.8), 69.7% for CRP (cutoff, 4.0), and 76.6% for PCT (cutoff, 0.05). The combination of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) with MDW improved the AUC (0.76; 95% CI, 0.72–0.80) to a greater extent than qSOFA alone (0.67; 95% CI, 0.62–0.72). Conclusions MDW reflected a diagnostic performance comparable to that of conventional diagnostic markers, implying that MDW is an alternative biomarker. The combination of MDW and qSOFA improves the diagnostic performance for early sepsis.