Search

We have sometimes experienced technical difficulty performing thoracoscopic esophagectomy because of the position of the descending aorta or width of the mediastinal space. In this study, we retrospectively investigated predictive preoperative factors that influence the procedure of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with a focus on the position of the descending aorta and width of the mediastinal space. Ninety-five patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by two specialists were included in this study. Thirty patients in whom both the operation time and blood loss in the thoracic region exceeded the median were categorized to the difficult group. The remaining 65 patients were categorized into the common group. During the evaluation of the position of the descending aorta, we measured the aorta–vertebra angle at the level of the left inferior pulmonary vein. During the evaluation of the width of the mediastinal space, we measured the sternum–vertebra distance at the level of the tracheal bifurcation. A forward stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed the following independent predictive factors of the technical difficulty of thoracoscopic esophagectomy: aorta–vertebra angle (≥ 30°), sternum–vertebra distance (

Many diseases can cause hypercalcaemia, including primary hyperparathyroidism, cancer, drugs and granulomatous diseases. A nursing home resident aged 81 years was admitted because of altered mental status. The patient did not have fever, cough, sputum or night sweat. Hypercalcaemia was identified as a cause of the consciousness disturbance. Chest radiograph showed no acute process. Laboratory workups revealed elevated serum levels of 1,25-(OH)2 vitamin D(3) and positive T-spot test. Microscopic examination of the suctioned sputum identified acid-fast bacilli, which was confirmed as Mycobactrium tuberculsosis. Tuberculosis should be considered as the important cause of hypercalcaemia since early diagnosis and treatment is recommended for preventing its outbreak among people with close contacts with patients.

Background The development of minimally invasive surgery has yielded many benefits, therefore the number of patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy (TRE) for esophageal cancer has been increasing worldwide. However, in the Japanese nationwide web-based database report, the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis and overall morbidity were significantly higher in the TRE group than in the open esophagectomy group. In recent years, intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) is commonly being used in thyroid and parathyroid surgery in many centers. We tried to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of IONM of RLN during upper mediastinal lymph node dissection in TRE. Methods All 628 patients who underwent TRE in the left lateral decubitus position at Osaka City University Hospital between May 1995 and February 2018 were enrolled in the present study. We introduced IONM using NIM® (Medtronic) during TRE from October 2016 at our hospital. We divided retrospectively the patients into two groups: IONM group (TRE with IONM of RLN; n = 49) and No-IONM group (TRE without IONM of RLN; n = 579). Diagnosis of RLN paralysis was performed using laryngoscopy. The feasibility of IONM during TRE and the incidence of postoperative RLN paralysis were compared with those in No-IONM group. Results IONM could be performed for 46 patients (93.9%) in IONM group. Three patients (6.1%) could not keep single-lung ventilation using a single lumen tracheal tube with a bronchial blocker and needed to replace a tracheal tube by a double lumen tube during TRE. The incidence of postoperative RLN paralysis (CD≧ 1; CD; Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications) was 17.4% in IONM group and 30.2% in No- IONM group. There was a significant difference in the incidence of postoperative RLN paralysis (P Conclusion IONM of RLN during TRE is technically feasible. The introduction of standardized IONM of RLN during TRE is able to reduce the incidence of postoperative RLN paralysis. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.