Search

The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increases in some healthcare-associated infections. We investigated the impact of the pandemic on the rates and molecular epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) within one VA hospital. We anticipated that the potential widespread use of antibiotics for pneumonia during the pandemic might increase CDI rates given that antibiotics are a major risk for CDI. Hospital data on patients with CDI and recurrent CDI (rCDI) were reviewed both prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (2015 to 2019) and during the pandemic (2020–2021). Restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) strain typing was performed on CD isolates recovered from stool samples collected from October 2019 to March 2022. CDI case numbers declined by 43.2% in 2020 to 2021 compared to the annual mean over the previous 5 years. The stool test positivity rate was also lower during the COVID-19 pandemic (14.3% vs. 17.2%; p = 0.013). Inpatient hospitalization rates declined, and rates of CDI among inpatients were reduced by 34.2% from 2020 to 2021. The mean monthly cases of rCDI also declined significantly after 2020 [3.38 (95% CI: 2.89–3.87) vs. 1.92 (95% CI: 1.27–2.56); p =

NTCD-M3 is a novel live biotherapeutic, that has been shown in a Phase 2 clinical trial to prevent recurrence of C. difficile infection (CDI) when administered shortly after antibiotic treatment of the initial CDI episode. Fidaxomicin was not, however, in widespread use at the time this study was conducted.

With the approval and development of narrow-spectrum antibiotics for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), the primary endpoint for treatment success of CDI antibiotic treatment trials has shifted from treatment response at end of therapy to sustained response 30 days after completed therapy. The current definition of a successful response to treatment (three or fewer unformed bowel movements [UBMs] per day for 1–2 days) has not been validated, does not reflect CDI management, and could impair assessments for successful treatment at 30 days. We propose new definitions to optimise trial design to assess sustained response. Primarily, we suggest that the initial response at the end of treatment be defined as (1) three or fewer UBMs per day, (2) a reduction in UBMs of more than 50% per day, (3) a decrease in stool volume of more than 75% for those with ostomy, or (4) attainment of bowel movements of Bristol Stool Form Scale types 1–4, on average, by day 2 after completion of primary CDI therapy (ie, assessed on day 11 and day 12 of a 10-day treatment course) and following an investigator determination that CDI treatment can be ceased.

Background U.S. laboratories are increasingly using a two-step algorithm to diagnose Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) that starts with a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), and if positive, reflexes to a toxin enzyme immunoassay. Here only a NAAT+/toxin+ result is reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) as a CDI laboratory-identified (LabID) event, but limited data suggest that NAAT+/toxin- results may also be considered CDI by clinicians. To explore this discrepancy, we compared the characteristics and treatment of NAAT+/toxin- and NAAT+/toxin+ patients. Methods CDC’s Emerging Infections Program (EIP) conducts population-based CDI surveillance. A case was defined as a positive C. difficile test in a person aged ≥1 year with no positive tests in the prior 8 weeks. We included cases detected by this two-step algorithm in 5 EIP sites during 2018–2020 that underwent a full chart review. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for age, sex, race, comorbidities, epidemiologic classification, and CDI therapy were used to compare CDI-related complications (i.e., toxic megacolon, ileus, colectomy, or intensive-care unit stay) and recurrence between the two groups. Results Of 1250 NAAT+ cases, 897 (72%) were toxin- and 353 (28%) were toxin+. Lower percentages of toxin- versus toxin+ cases were aged ≥65 years (42% vs 58%; P< 0.0001), had diarrhea (779/831 [94%] vs 329/338 [97%]; P=0.01), or had white blood cell counts ≥15,000 cells/μL (183/811 [23%] vs 132/321 [42%]; P< 0.0001). CDI therapy was given to 683/882 (77%) toxin- versus 338/349 (97%) toxin+ cases (P< 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, toxin- status was protective for recurrence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32–0.74) but not for CDI-related complications (aOR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.64–1.56). Conclusion NAAT+/toxin- cases were less likely to have recurrence but were as likely to have CDI-related complications as NAAT+/toxin+ cases. More than twice as many potentially unreported NAAT+/toxin- cases were treated than the number of reported NAAT+/toxin+ treated cases. Use of this two-step algorithm likely results in underreporting of treated CDI cases to NHSN. Disclosures Scott Fridkin, MD, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Dale N. Gerding, MD, Destiny Pharma plc.: Advisor/Consultant.

Background We have previously reported on a US based national surveillance study from 6 geographically dispersed medical centers for the susceptibility and epidemiology of C. difficile isolates. This current survey was conducted with isolates collected in 2020-21 with specific attention to the susceptibility to ridinilazole as well as nine comparators. A summary of the susceptibilities of 300 isolates of C. difficile tested against 10 antimicrobial agents Methods in 2020-21 C. difficile isolates or stools from patients with C. difficile toxin positive antibiotic associated diarrhea were collected in 6 US medical centers and referred to a central lab. After confirmation of 300 isolates antibiotic susceptibilities were determined by agar dilution method (CLSI M11-A9) against 10 agents listed in Table below. Ribotyping was performed by PCR capillary gel electrophoresis on all isolates. Results A summary of the susceptibilities of the 300 isolates against 10 antimicrobial agents are shown in the Table. The most common ribotype was 014-020 (14.4% compared to 11.8% in 2016), followed by 106 (10%, compared to 15% in 2016), 027 (10% compared to 13.1% in 2016), 002 (8% compared to 8.5% in 2016, 078-126 (4.3% compared to 1.3% in 2016). Ridinilazole was very potent against all isolates collected in the US with an MIC 90 of 0.25 mcg/ml, including against all the hypervirulent ribotypes as well as those isolates with antibiotic resistances to other antibiotics in the test panel. Conclusion Ridinilazole showed excellent in-vitro activity against C. difficile isolates in the US, independent of ribotype. There has been a striking change in ribotype distribution compared to 2016, accompanied by a reduction in C. difficile resistance to moxifloxacin and imipenem. Disclosures Cheleste M. Thorpe, MD, Actelion: Grant/Research Support|Deinove: Advisor/Consultant|General Mills: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Summit: Advisor/Consultant|Summit: Grant/Research Support Stuart Johnson, M.D., Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Membership on Ferring Publication Steering Committee|Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Summit Plc: Advisor/Consultant Dale N. Gerding, MD, Destiny Pharma plc.: Advisor/Consultant Karen C. Carroll, MD, Abbott Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|BD Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|BD Diagnostics: Grant/Research Support|BioRad, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Meridian Biosciences: Grant/Research Support|Roche Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|Scanogen, Inc: Advisor/Consultant|Scanogen, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Thermo Fisher, Inc: Advisor/Consultant Kevin W. Garey, PharmD, MS, Acurx: Grant/Research Support|cidara: Advisor/Consultant|cidara: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support|Seres Health: Grant/Research Support|Summit: Grant/Research Support Esther Duperchy, PhD, Summit Plc: Employee David R. Snydman, MD, Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck and Company: Grant/Research Support|Prolacta: Advisor/Consultant|Prolacta: Grant/Research Support|Seres: Advisor/Consultant|Seres Health: Grant/Research Support|Summit Plc: Grant/Research Support|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda: Grant/Research Support|Visterra: Advisor/Consultant.

Background Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) are caused by a large and diverse group of strains with differences in prevalence and associated morbidity. Over the past 20 years the C. difficile (CD) molecular epidemiology has changed as the prevalence of the epidemic strain recognized as restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) group BI or PCR-Ribotype group (RT) 027 has decreased. The objective of this study was to determine the current epidemiology of CD in the city of Chicago. Methods Baseline characteristics and symptoms were compared for 81 patients who tested positive for CD by PCR (tcdB) between 9/1/2021 and 10/7/2021 at 3 hospitals in the city of Chicago. Patients were classified as having healthcare-associated CDI (HA-CDI) if symptoms began >72 hours after hospital admission, community-associated CDI (CA-CDI) if symptoms began ≤72 hours prior to admission, and community-onset healthcare-associated CDI (COHA-CDI) if they had been hospitalized ≤4 weeks prior to CDI diagnosis. Available stools were cultured and recovered CD isolates underwent REA typing. Determination of CD colonization was made by review of symptoms including chronicity of symptoms, stool frequency, and response to treatment. Results Among all patients, 33% (27/81) were CA-CDI, 28% (23/81) COHA-CDI, 11% (9/81) HA-CDI, and 27% (22/81) were classified as colonized. Primary CDI accounted for 66% (39/59) of the infections. Among patients with a primary CDI, 46% (18/39) of patients were classified as CA-CDI whereas COHA-CDI and HA-CDI accounted for 54% (21/39) of infections. REA group Y was the most common group strain accounting for 29% (22/75) of isolates. (Figure 1) REA group Y accounted for 26% (7/27) of CA-CDI compared to 0 REA group BI [p=0.06], and REA group Y accounted for 35% (7/20) of all colonized patients. (Figure 2) Figure 1Figure 2 Conclusion There has been a marked change in the CD epidemiology within the city of Chicago since 2009 when REA group BI accounted for 61% of CDI (Black et al ICHE 2011; 32:897-902). REA group Y (typically identified as RT 014/020) is now the most common group strain in Chicago supplanting REA group BI (RT027). REA group Y appears to be associated primarily with CA-CDI and CD colonization. A detailed genomic analysis of REA group Y is required to determine potential reservoirs of REA group Y. Disclosures Mary K. Hayden, MD, Sanofi: Member, clinical adjudication panel Nicholas M. Moore, PhD, D(ABMM), Abbott Molecular: Grant/Research Support|Cepheid: Grant/Research Support Amanda Harrington, PhD, Beckman Coulter, Inc.: Clinical trial data collection funded by Beckman Coulter, Inc.|bioMeriuex/BioFire: Grant/Research Support Dale N. Gerding, MD, Destiny Pharma plc.: Advisor/Consultant Stuart Johnson, M.D., Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Membership on Ferring Publication Steering Committee|Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Summit Plc: Advisor/Consultant.

Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) research is limited by a lack of standardized definitions for clinical response and disease outcomes, which impacts clinical drug development and results comparison between studies. We aimed to assess outcome definitions in CDI therapeutic trials to propose new versions that are clinically relevant, discrete and objective. Methods A multidisciplinary group of CDI experts met monthly to review response endpoints from published clinical trials of antibiotic therapy for CDI. Previously published phase III or IV trials were assessed for outcome definitions. Discussions were held to reach a consensus on new clinical trial endpoints for adults and children to improve the accuracy and clinical relevance of measures of treatment success. Results Significant heterogeneity was noted amongst the primary endpoints in phase III and IV CDI antibiotic treatment trials. Initial clinical cure (ICC), strictly defined as < 3 unformed bowel movements/24 hour, and sustained clinical cure (SCC) were primary outcome measures for recent clinical trials. The strict ICC definition incompletely measures treatment success as assessed in clinical practice and, since ICC is necessary to achieve SCC, may lead to type II error for SCC. A set of proposed alternative outcome definitions was developed using the terms initial response (IR) and sustained response (SR) (Figure 1). IR allows for investigator assessment of overall improvement in CDI response more analogous to clinical practice and will lead to more patients eligible to meet SR. Achievement of SR requires both IR and no need for retreatment of CDI by day 30 after antibiotic completion and is the more relevant endpoint for CDI therapeutic development. The use of a less restrictive IR definition will more accurately capture early responses to treatment and importantly increase the validity of SR. The shortening of follow-up period by 30 days is also anticipated to reduce costs and efforts associated with conducting trials. Timeline of CDI outcome assessments for clinical trials Conclusion The set of definitions proposed here will more accurately capture clinical success and standardize the approach to outcome assessment in trials of CDI therapeutics. Disclosures Carolyn D. Alonso, MD, Cidara Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant Oliver A. Cornely, Prof. Dr., Abbott: Honoraria|Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|Actelion: Board Member|Al-Jazeera Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria|Allecra Therapeutics: Board Member|Amplyx: Advisor/Consultant|Amplyx: Grant/Research Support|Astellas: Honoraria|Basilea: Advisor/Consultant|Basilea: Grant/Research Support|Biocon: Advisor/Consultant|Biosys: Advisor/Consultant|BMBF: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Advisor/Consultant|Cidara: Board Member|Cidara: Expert Testimony|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|CoRe Consulting: Stocks/Bonds|Da Volterra: Advisor/Consultant|DLR: Grant/Research Support|DZIF: Grant/Research Support|Entasis: Board Member|EU Directorate-General for Resarch and Innovation: Grant/Research Support|F2G: Grant/Research Support|German Patent and Trade Mark Office: German patent (DE 10 2021 113 007.7)|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Grupo Biotoscana/United Medical/Knight: Honoraria|Hikma: Honoraria|IQVIA: Board Member|Janssen: Board Member|Matinas: Advisor/Consultant|Matinas: Grant/Research Support|MedPace: Advisor/Consultant|MedPace: Grant/Research Support|MedScape: Honoraria|MedUpdate: Honoraria|Menarini: Advisor/Consultant|Merck/MSD: Grant/Research Support|Merck/MSD: Honoraria|Molecular Partners: Advisor/Consultant|MSG-ERC: Advisor/Consultant|Mundipharma: Grant/Research Support|Mylan: Honoraria|Noxxon: Advisor/Consultant|Octapharma: Advisor/Consultant|Octapharma: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Board Member|Pardes: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Projektträger Jülich: Grant/Research Support|PSI: Advisor/Consultant|PSI: Board Member|Pulmocide: Board Member|Scynexis: Advisor/Consultant|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support|Seres: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Board Member|Wiley (Blackwell): Editor-in-Chief, Mycoses Kevin W. Garey, PharmD, MS, Acurx Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Seres Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Summit Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support Dale N. Gerding, MD, Destiny Pharma plc.: Advisor/Consultant Stuart Johnson, M.D., Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Membership on Ferring Publication Steering Committee|Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Summit Plc: Advisor/Consultant Stacy A. Kahn, MD, Lilly: Stocks/Bonds Ciaran P. Kelly, n/a, Artugen: Advisor/Consultant|Facile Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring Pharma: Advisor/Consultant|Finch: Advisor/Consultant|Finch: Advisor/Consultant|First Light Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|First Light Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Milky Way Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Milky Way Biosciences: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Seres Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Summit Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant Larry K. Kociolek, MD, MSCI, Merck: Grant/Research Support Thomas J. Louie, MD, Artugen: Advisor/Consultant|Artugen: Grant/Research Support|Crestone: Advisor/Consultant|Crestone: Grant/Research Support|Finch Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Finch Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Rebiotix: Advisor/Consultant|Rebiotix: Grant/Research Support|Seres Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Seres Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|summit plc: Advisor/Consultant|summit plc: Grant/Research Support|Vedanta Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Vedanta Biosciences: Grant/Research Support Maria Vehreschild, Prof. Dr., 3M: speaker fee|Astellas: Advisor/Consultant|Astellas: speaker fee|biologische heilmittel heel gmbh: Grant/Research Support|BioNtech: Grant/Research Support|EUMEDICA: Advisor/Consultant|Farmak International Holding: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Speaker fee|Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Immunic AG: Advisor/Consultant|MaaT: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: speaker fee|MSD: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Grant/Research Support|MSD: speaker fees|Pfizer: speaker fee|Roche Molecular Systems: Grant/Research Support|Roche Molecular Systems: speaker fees|SocraRTec R&D GmbH: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda California: Grant/Research Support Professor Mark H. Wilcox, MD, FRCPath, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Board Member|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Phico Therapeutics: Board Member|Seres: Advisor/Consultant|Seres: Board Member|Seres: Grant/Research Support|Summit: Advisor/Consultant|Summit: Grant/Research Support Erik R. Dubberke, MD, MSPH, Abbott: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Seres: Advisor/Consultant|Summit: Advisor/Consultant|Synthetic Biologics: Grant/Research Support.

Among persons with an initial Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) across 10 US sites in 2018 compared with 2013, 18.3% versus 21.1% had ≥1 recurrent CDI (rCDI) within 180 days. We observed a 16% lower adjusted risk of rCDI in 2018 versus 2013 (P

Introduction: Clostridiodes difficile infection is the leading cause of infectious diarrhea in the United States, with substantial morbidity and mortality. Recurrent infection is especially challenging, with each recurrence increasing the likelihood of a successive recurrence, leading to cycles of prolonged symptoms, frequent antimicrobial use, and decreased quality of life. Fecal microbiota transplantation to prevent recurrent infection is a promising intervention with a large effect size in observational studies, but with conflicting results from randomized controlled trials. We are conducting a Veterans Affairs-wide randomized controlled trial utilizing centralized case identification, with enrollment and fecal microbiota transplant administration occurring at the participant’s home. This type of trial design significantly improves trial efficiency, greatly decreases trial cost, increases consistency of trial administration, and most importantly makes nationwide clinical trials in less-common diseases possible. Methods: This is a randomized comparison of capsule-delivered fecal microbiota transplant for the prevention of recurrent Clostridiodes difficile infection, administered after successful initial treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection with standard therapy. The primary endpoint is the incidence of recurrent C. difficile infection or death. Cases are identified by searching the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse, with central study coordinators then reaching out to potential participants. Individuals meeting inclusion criteria and interested in participation are scheduled for in-home consent, randomization, and capsule administration, followed by telephone follow-up for 6 months. To mitigate risks of COVID-19, enrollment via video visits has been implemented. Results: A total of 102 participants have been enrolled through January 2021. Centralized case identification and in-home enrollment has facilitated enrollment from 34 unique states, with 38% being from rural or highly rural areas. Discussion: Centralized case identification and in-home enrollment is a feasible and innovative method of conducting randomized controlled trials in the Veterans Affairs system, improving access to clinical research for populations who may have difficulty engaging with the traditional model of clinical trials where enrollment is based at large hospitals in major metropolitan areas.

Background:Most clinical microbiology laboratories have replaced toxin immunoassay (EIA) alone with multistep testing (MST) protocols or nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) alone for the detection of C. difficile.Objective:Study the effect of changing testing strategies on C. difficile detection and strain diversity.Design:Retrospective study.Setting:A Veterans’ Affairs hospital.Methods:Initially, toxin EIA testing was replaced by an MST approach utilizing a glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin EIA followed by tcdB NAAT for discordant results. After 18 months, MST was replaced by a NAAT-only strategy. Available patient stool specimens were cultured for C. difficile. Restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) strain typing and quantitative in vitro toxin testing were performed on recovered isolates.Results:Before MST (toxin EIA), 79 of 708 specimens (11%) were positive, and after MST (MST-A), 121 of 517 specimens (23%) were positive (P < .0001). Prior to NAAT-only testing (MST-B), 80 of the 490 specimens (16%) were positive by MST, and after NAAT-only testing was implemented, 67 of the 368 specimens (18%) were positive (P = nonsignificant). After replacing toxin EIA testing, REA strain group diversity increased (8, 13, 13, and 10 REA groups in the toxin EIA, MST-A, MST-B, and NAAT-only periods, respectively) and in vitro toxin concentration decreased. The average log10 toxin concentration of the isolates were 2.08, 1.88, 1.20 and 1.55 ng/mL for the same periods, respectively.Conclusions:MST and NAAT had similar detection rates for C. difficile. Compared to toxin testing alone, they detected increased diversity of C. difficile strains, many of which were low toxin producing.

Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) causes significant morbidity in nursing home residents. Our aim was to describe adherence to a bundled CDI prevention initiative, which had previously been deployed nationwide in Veterans Health Administration (VA) long-term care facilities (LTCFs), and to improve compliance with reinforcement. Methods A multicenter pre- and post-reinforcement of the VA bundle consisting of environmental management, hand hygiene, and contact precautions was conducted in 6 VA LTCFs. A campaign to reinforce VA bundle components, as well as to promote select antimicrobial stewardship recommendations and contact precautions for 30 days, was employed. Hand hygiene, antimicrobial usage, and environmental contamination, before and after bundle reinforcement, were assessed. Results All LTCFs reported following the guidelines for cleaning and contact precautions until diarrhea resolution pre-reinforcement. Environmental specimens rarely yielded C difficile pre- or post-reinforcement. Proper hand hygiene across all facilities did not change with reinforcement (pre 52.51%, post 52.18%), nor did antimicrobial use (pre 87–197 vs. post 84–245 antibiotic days per 1,000 resident-days). LTCFs found it challenging to maintain prolonged contact precautions. Discussion Variation in infection prevention and antimicrobial prescribing practices across LTCFs were identified and lessons learned. Conclusions Introducing bundled interventions in LTCFs is challenging, given the available resources, and may be more successful with fewer components and more intensive execution with feedback.

Background Efforts to prevent Clostridioides difficile infection continue to expand across the health care spectrum in the United States. Whether these efforts are reducing the national bu...

BackgroundAlthough many large, randomized controlled trials (RCT) have been conducted on antibiotic therapy for patients with primary C. difficile infections (CDI), few RCTs have been performed for patients with recurrent CDI (rCDI). In addition, fecal microbial transplant (FMT) is neither FDA-approved or guideline-recommended for patients with pauci-rCDI (first or second recurrences). Therefore, a rigorous RCT of sufficient size was designed to determine the optimal treatment among three antibiotic regimens in current practice for treatment of pauci-rCDI.MethodsVA Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) #596 is a prospective, double-blind, multi-center clinical trial of veteran patients with pauci-rCDI comparing fidaxomicin (FDX) 200mg twice daily for 10days and vancomycin (VAN) 125mg four times daily for 10days followed by a 3-week vancomycin taper and pulse (VAN-T/P) regimen to a standard course of VAN 125mg four times daily for 10days. The primary endpoint is sustained clinical response at day 59, with sustained response measured as a diarrhea composite outcome (D-COM) that includes symptom resolution during treatment (before day 10) without recurrence of diarrhea or other clinically important outcomes through day 59.DiscussionCSP study 596 is designed to compare three current antibiotic treatments for recurrent CDI that are in clinical practice, but which lack high-quality evidence to support strong guideline recommendations. The design of the study which included a pilot phase initiated at six sites with expansion to 24 sites is described along with protocol modifications based on early trial experience and clinical realities including the COVID-19 pandemic.Trial registrationThis study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02667418).

Background Effective treatment options for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) are limited, with high recurrence rates associated with the current standard of care. Herein we report results from an open-label Phase 2 trial to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and durability of RBX2660—a standardized microbiota-based investigational live biotherapeutic—and a closely-matched historical control cohort. Methods This prospective, multicenter, open-label Phase 2 study enrolled patients who had experienced either ≥ 2 recurrences of CDI, treated by standard-of-care antibiotic therapy, after a primary CDI episode, or ≥ 2 episodes of severe CDI requiring hospitalization. Participants received up to 2 doses of RBX2660 rectally administered with doses 7 days apart. Treatment success was defined as the absence of CDI diarrhea without the need for retreatment for 8 weeks after completing study treatment. A historical control group with matched inclusion and exclusion criteria was identified from a retrospective chart review of participants treated with standard-of-care antibiotics for recurrent CDI who matched key criteria for the study. The primary objective was to compare treatment success of RBX2660 to the historical control group. A key secondary outcome was the safety profile of RBX2660, including adverse events and CDI occurrence through 24 months after treatment. In addition, fecal samples from RBX2660-treated participants were sequenced to evaluate microbiome composition and functional changes from before to after treatment. Results In this Phase 2 open-label clinical trial, RBX2660 demonstrated a 78.9% (112/142) treatment success rate compared to a 30.7% (23/75) for the historical control group (p Conclusions In this Phase 2 trial, RBX2660 was safe and effective for reducing rCDI recurrence as compared to a historical control group. Microbiome changes are consistent with restorative changes implicated in resisting C. difficile recurrence. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02589847 (10/28/2015)

Background:Clostridioides difficile is a major cause of antibiotic-associated colitis and the most common healthcare-associated pathogen in the United States. Interrupting the known transmission mechanisms of C. difficile in hospitals requires appropriate hand hygiene, disinfection of potentially contaminated surfaces, and patient equipment. However, only limited data are available on the effectiveness of germicides against various strains of C. difficile, with and without fetal calf serum, and at multiple exposure times. For this reason, we undertook the following evaluation to determine the effectiveness of germicides. Methods: The effectiveness of the sporicidal activity of the germicides against 5 strains of C. difficile was evaluated using a quantitative carrier test, a standard of ASTM International developed by Sattar et al. In this protocol, metal carriers (1 cm diameter 0.7 mm thick) were inoculated with 10 L spore suspension, containing ~103 or 106 C. difficile spores, and we then exposed them to 50 L germicide for 1, 5, 10, or 20 minutes. The following C. difficile strains were used in these studies: ATCC strains 9689; J9; BI-9; 630; and CF-4. To determine whether C. difficile spore susceptibility was similar to other spores, we also tested Bacillus atrophaeus spores, ATCC strain 19659. Fetal calf serum (FCS) was used to simulate organic matter. Results: In general, high-level disinfectants (eg, OPA, glutaraldehyde), chemical sterilants (eg, peracetic acid), and high concentrations of chlorine (>5,000 ppm) were generally sporicidal (>3 log10 reduction) in 5–10 minutes (and sometimes 1 minute). This level of sporicidal activity was demonstrated for the various strains of C. difficile spores and B. atrophaeus spores (Table 1). There did not appear to be any significant differences in inactivation of C. difficile spores (BI-9 strain) in the presence or absence of FCS (Table 2). Discussion: The sporicidal activity of disinfectants is critical because such formulations are routinely used to eliminate the risk associated with noncritical and semicritical instruments and environmental surfaces. Our data suggest that immersion in most (but not all) high-level disinfectants for 10 minutes is likely to be successful in eradicating C. difficile spores (>4 log10 reduction) from semicritical equipment (eg, endoscopes). Additionally, high concentrations of chlorine and some high-level disinfectants will kill C. difficile spores in 1 or 2 minutes.Funding: NoneDisclosures: Drs. Rutala and Weber are consultants to PDI (Professional Disposable International)

Objective: To describe the burden and risk of healthcare facility-onset, healthcare facility-associated (HO-HCFA) Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in Veterans with spinal cord injury and disorder (SCI/D). Design: Retrospective, longitudinal cohort study from October 1, 2001–September 30, 2010. Setting: Ninety-four acute care Veterans Affairs facilities. Participants: Patients with SCI/D. Outcomes: Incidence rate of HO-HCFA CDI. Methods: Rates of CDI were determined, and crude unadjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Multivariable Poisson random-effects regression analyses were used to assess factors independently associated with the rate of CDI. Results: 1,409 cases of HO-HCFA CDI were identified. CDI rates in 2002 were 13.9/10,000 person-days and decreased to 5.5/10,000 person-days by 2010. Multivariable regression analyses found that antibiotic (IRR = 18.79, 95% CI 14.09-25.07) and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) or H2 blocker use (IRR = 7.71, 95% CI 5.47-10.86) were both independently associated with HO-HCFA CDI. Exposure to both medications demonstrated a synergistic risk (IRR = 37.55, 95% CI 28.39-49.67). Older age, Northeast region, and invasive respiratory procedure in the prior 30 days were also independent risk factors, while longer SCI duration and care at a SCI center were protective. Conclusion: Although decreasing, CDI rates in patients with SCI/D remain high. Targeted antimicrobial stewardship and pharmacy interventions that reduce antibiotic and PPI/H2 blocker use could have profound benefits in decreasing HO-HCFA CDI in this high-risk population.

Background Endogenous antibodies (eAbs) against Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile toxins may protect against recurrence of C. difficile infection (rCDI). This hypothesis was tested using placebo group data from MODIFY (Monoclonal Antibodies for C. difficile Therapy) I and II (NCT01241552 and NCT01513239, respectively), global, randomized phase 3 trials that assessed the efficacy and safety of the antitoxin monoclonal antibodies bezlotoxumab and actoxumab in participants receiving antibiotic therapy for CDI. Methods A placebo infusion (normal saline) was administered on study day 1. Serum samples were collected on day 1, week 4, and week 12, and eAb-A and eAb-B titers were measured by 2 validated electrochemiluminescence immunoassays. Rates of initial clinical cure and rCDI were summarized by eAb titer category (low, medium, high) at each time point. Results Serum eAb titers were available from a total of 773 participants. The proportion of participants with high eAb-A and eAb-B titers increased over time. Rates of initial clinical cure were similar across eAb titer categories. There was no correlation between eAb-A titers and rCDI rate at any time point. However, there was a negative correlation between rCDI and eAb-B titer on day 1 and week 4. rCDI occurred in 22% of participants with high eAb-B titers at baseline compared with 35% with low or medium titers (P = .015). Conclusions Higher eAb titers against toxin B, but not toxin A, were associated with protection against rCDI. These data are consistent with the observed efficacy of bezlotoxumab, and lack of efficacy of actoxumab, in the MODIFY trials. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01241552 and NCT01513239.

Background Most Clostridioides difficile toxinogenic strains produce both toxins A and B (A+B+), but toxin A–negative, toxin B–positive (A−B+) variants also cause disease. We report the identification of a series of pathogenic clinical C. difficile isolates that produce high amounts of toxin A with low or nondetectable toxin B. Methods An ultrasensitive, quantitative immunoassay was used to measure toxins A and B in stool samples from 187 C. difficile infection (CDI) patients and 44 carriers. Isolates were cultured and assessed for in vitro toxin production and in vivo phenotypes (mouse CDI model). Results There were 7 CDI patients and 6 carriers who had stools with detectable toxin A (TcdA, range 23–17 422 pg/mL; 5.6% of samples overall) but toxin B (TcdB) below the clinical detection limit (>B isolates tested in mice, 4 caused diarrhea, and 3 of those 4 caused lethal disease. Ribotyping demonstrated strain diversity. TcdA-predominant samples were also identified at 2 other centers, with similar frequencies (7.5% and 6.8%). Conclusions We report the discovery of clinical pathogenic C. difficile strains that produce high levels of toxin A but minimal or no toxin B. This pattern of toxin production is not rare (>5% of isolates) and is consistently observed in vitro and in vivo in humans and mice. Our study highlights the significance of toxin A in human CDI pathogenesis and has important implications for CDI diagnosis, treatment, and vaccine development.

Current and future management of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) including antibiotic treatment is increasingly focused on preventive strategies, either prevention of recurrent CDI (rCDI) or primary prevention of CDI. In addition to newer narrow spectrum antibiotics and pulse dosing of antibiotic treatment, multiple widely differing approaches to prevention of CDI and rCDI are under clinical development or recently approved for clinical use. They include immunologics, both passive monoclonal antibodies and active vaccines targeted at C. difficile toxins, approaches to reduce antibiotic dysbiosis in the gut, microbiome restoration using fecal microbiome transplants (FMT) or biotherapeutic bacterial derivatives, and substitution of non-toxigenic C. difficile (NTCD) for toxigenic C. difficile. Newer antibiotics, monoclonal antibodies, and FMT are targeted at reducing rCDI whereas vaccines and reduction of antibiotic dysbiosis in the gut are targeted at prevention of primary CDI. Biotherapeutics may be used for prevention of either primary CDI or rCDI. Approaches such as monoclonal antibodies, FMT, and biotherapeutics provide rapid but transient preventive benefits, whereas vaccines require weeks to months to be effective, but will presumably provide long term prevention. More rapid but transient prevention strategies such as FMT and biotherapeutics could be used in combination with vaccines to provide both rapid and durable CDI prevention.

Background Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile colonization is common among infants. Serological sequelae of infant C. difficile colonization are poorly understood. Methods In this prospective cohort study of healthy infants, stools serially collected between ages 1-2 and 9-12 months were tested for non-toxigenic and toxigenic C. difficile (TCD). Cultured isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing. Serum collected at 9–12 months underwent measurement of IgA, IgG, and IgM against TCD toxins A and B and neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers against toxin B. For comparison, antitoxin IgG and NAb were measured in cord blood from 50 mothers unrelated to study infants. Results Among 32 infants, 16 (50%) were colonized with TCD; 12 were first colonized >1 month before serology measurements. A variety of sequence types were identified, and there was evidence of putative in-home (enrolled siblings) and outpatient clinic transmission. Infants first colonized with TCD >1 month prior had significantly greater serum antitoxin IgA and IgG against toxins A (P = .02 for both) and B (P = .009 and .008, respectively) compared with non–TCD-colonized infants, and greater IgG compared with unrelated cord blood (P = .005). Five of 12 (42%) colonized infants had detectable NAb titers compared with zero non–TCD-colonized infants (P = .02). Breastfeeding was not associated with differences in serological measurements. Conclusions TCD colonization is associated with a humoral immune response against toxins A and B, with evidence of toxin B neutralization in vitro. The extent and duration of protection against CDI later in life afforded by natural C. difficile immunization events require further investigation.

Summary Background Cadazolid is a novel quinoxolidinone antibiotic developed for treating Clostridium difficile infection. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of cadazolid compared with vancomycin in patients with C difficile infection. Methods IMPACT 1 and IMPACT 2 were identically designed, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trials. IMPACT 1 was done in Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Peru, Poland, Romania, Spain, and the USA, and IMPACT 2 was done in Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Croatia, Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Romania, Slovakia, South Korea, the UK, and the USA. Patients (aged 18 years or older) with mild-to-moderate or severe C difficile infection (diarrhoea with positive glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin A or B enzyme immunoassays) were randomly assigned (1:1) with a randomisation list stratified by centre and C difficile infection episode type (block size of four), and allocation was masked to investigators and participants. Patients received either oral cadazolid 250 mg twice daily with vancomycin-matching placebo capsule four times daily or oral vancomycin 125 mg four times a day with cadazolid-matching placebo suspension twice daily for 10 days, with 30 days of follow-up. The primary efficacy outcome was non-inferiority (margin −10%) of cadazolid versus vancomycin for clinical cure in the modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Clinical cure was defined as resolution of diarrhoea with no additional treatment for C difficile infection. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , numbers NCT01987895 (IMPACT 1) and NCT01983683 (IMPACT 2). Findings Between March 28, 2014, and March 24, 2017, for IMPACT 1, and Dec 13, 2013, and May 2, 2017, for IMPACT 2, 1263 participants were randomly assigned to receive cadazolid (306 in IMPACT 1 and 298 in IMPACT 2) or vancomycin (326 in IMPACT 1 and 311 in IMPACT 2). In the modified intention-to-treat population in IMPACT 1, 253 (84%) of 302 had clinical cure in the cadazolid group versus 271 (85%) of 318 in the vancomycin group. In IMPACT 2, 235 (81%) of 290 versus 258 (86%) of 301 had clinical cure. In the per-protocol population, 247 (88%) of 282 versus 264 (92%) of 288 had clinical cure in IMPACT 1 and 214 (87%) of 247 versus 237 (92%) of 259 in IMPACT 2. Non-inferiority for clinical cure to vancomycin was shown in IMPACT 1 but not in IMPACT 2 (IMPACT 1 treatment difference: −1·4 [95% CI −7·2 to 4·3] for modified intention to treat and −4·1 [–9·2 to 1·0] for per protocol; IMPACT 2: −4·7 [–10·7 to 1·3] for modified intention to treat and −4·9 [–10·4 to 0·6] for per protocol). The safety and tolerability profiles of the two antibiotics were similar. Interpretation Cadazolid was safe and well tolerated but did not achieve its primary endpoint of non-inferiority to vancomycin for clinical cure in one of two phase 3 C difficile infection trials. Therefore, further commercial development of cadazolid for C difficile infection is unlikely. Funding Actelion Pharmaceuticals.

This is a randomized comparison of capsule-delivered fecal microbiota transplant for the prevention of recurrentA total of 102 participants have been enrolled through January 2021. Centralized case identification and in-home enrollment has facilitated enrollment from 34 unique states, with 38% being from rural or highly rural areas.Centralized case identification and in-home enrollment is a feasible and innovative method of conducting randomized controlled trials in the Veterans Affairs system, improving access to clinical research for populations who may have difficulty engaging with the traditional model of clinical trials where enrollment is based at large hospitals in major metropolitan areas.

We treated 46 patients with multiple recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (mrCDI) using a tapered-pulsed (T-P) fidaxomicin regimen, the majority of whom failed prior T-P vancomycin treatment. Sustained clinical response rates at 30 and 90 days were 74% (34/46) and 61% (28/46). T-P fidaxomicin shows promise for management of mrCDI.

Nontoxigenic Clostridioides difficile strain M3 (NTCD-M3) protects hamsters and humans against C. difficile infection. Transfer in vitro of the pathogenicity locus (PaLoc) to nontoxigenic strain CD37 has been reported. We repeated these conjugations using toxigenic strain 630Δerm as donor and NTCD-M3 and CD37 as recipients. In order to conduct these matings we induced rifampin resistance (50ug/ml) in NTCD-M3 by serial passage on rifampin-containing media to obtain strain NTCD-M3r. 630Δerm/CD37 matings produced 21 PaLoc transconjugants in 5.5 x 109 recipient CFUs; a frequency of 3.8 x 10−9. All transconjugants carried the tcdB gene and produced toxin. 630Δerm/NTCD-M3r matings produced no transconjugants in 5 assays with a total of 9.4 x 109 NTCD-M3r recipient cells. Toxin gene transfer to NTCD-M3r could not be demonstrated under conditions that demonstrated transfer to strain CD37.

Most pathogenic strains of C. difficile possess two large molecular weight single unit toxins with four similar functional domains. The toxins disrupt the actin cytoskeleton of intestinal epithelial cells leading to loss of tight junctions, which ultimately manifests as diarrhea in the host. While initial studies of purified toxins in animal models pointed to toxin A (TcdA) as the main virulence factor, animal studies using isogenic mutants demonstrated that toxin B (TcdB) alone was sufficient to cause disease. In addition, the natural occurrence of TcdA&minus, /TcdB+ (TcdA&minus, /B+)mutant strains was shown to be responsible for cases of C. difficile infection (CDI) with symptoms identical to CDI caused by fully toxigenic (A+/B+) strains. Identification of these cases was delayed during the period when clinical laboratories were using immunoassays that only detected TcdA (toxA EIA). Our hospital laboratory at the time performed culture as well as toxA EIA on patient stool samples. A total of 1.6% (23/1436) of all clinical isolates recovered over a 2.5-year period were TcdA&minus, /B+ variants, the majority of which belonged to the restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) group CF and toxinotype VIII. Despite reports of serious disease due to TcdA&minus, /B+ CF strains, these infections were typically mild, often not requiring specific treatment. While TcdB alone may be sufficient to cause disease, clinical evidence suggests that both toxins have a role in disease.

Most pathogenic strains of C. difficile possess two large molecular weight single unit toxins with four similar functional domains. The toxins disrupt the actin cytoskeleton of intestinal epithelial cells leading to loss of tight junctions, which ultimately manifests as diarrhea in the host. While initial studies of purified toxins in animal models pointed to toxin A (TcdA) as the main virulence factor, animal studies using isogenic mutants demonstrated that toxin B (TcdB) alone was sufficient to cause disease. In addition, the natural occurrence of TcdA−/TcdB+ (TcdA−/B+)mutant strains was shown to be responsible for cases of C. difficile infection (CDI) with symptoms identical to CDI caused by fully toxigenic (A+/B+) strains. Identification of these cases was delayed during the period when clinical laboratories were using immunoassays that only detected TcdA (toxA EIA). Our hospital laboratory at the time performed culture as well as toxA EIA on patient stool samples. A total of 1.6% (23/1436) of all clinical isolates recovered over a 2.5-year period were TcdA−/B+ variants, the majority of which belonged to the restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) group CF and toxinotype VIII. Despite reports of serious disease due to TcdA−/B+ CF strains, these infections were typically mild, often not requiring specific treatment. While TcdB alone may be sufficient to cause disease, clinical evidence suggests that both toxins have a role in disease.

Most clinical microbiology laboratories have replaced toxin immunoassay (EIA) alone with multistep testing (MST) protocols or nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) alone for the detection of C. difficile.Study the effect of changing testing strategies on C. difficile detection and strain diversity.Retrospective study.A Veterans' Affairs hospital.Initially, toxin EIA testing was replaced by an MST approach utilizing a glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin EIA followed by tcdB NAAT for discordant results. After 18 months, MST was replaced by a NAAT-only strategy. Available patient stool specimens were cultured for C. difficile. Restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) strain typing and quantitative in vitro toxin testing were performed on recovered isolates.Before MST (toxin EIA), 79 of 708 specimens (11%) were positive, and after MST (MST-A), 121 of 517 specimens (23%) were positive (P.0001). Prior to NAAT-only testing (MST-B), 80 of the 490 specimens (16%) were positive by MST, and after NAAT-only testing was implemented, 67 of the 368 specimens (18%) were positive (P = nonsignificant). After replacing toxin EIA testing, REA strain group diversity increased (8, 13, 13, and 10 REA groups in the toxin EIA, MST-A, MST-B, and NAAT-only periods, respectively) and in vitro toxin concentration decreased. The average log10 toxin concentration of the isolates were 2.08, 1.88, 1.20 and 1.55 ng/mL for the same periods, respectively.MST and NAAT had similar detection rates for C. difficile. Compared to toxin testing alone, they detected increased diversity of C. difficile strains, many of which were low toxin producing.

Background In phase 3 MODIFY I/II trials, bezlotoxumab significantly reduced recurrence of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (rCDI) over 12 weeks. Choice of CDI antibacterial treatment may affect CDI-related outcomes; therefore, this prespecified analysis assessed if the magnitude of bezlotoxumab-induced rCDI reduction was influenced by the antibiotic administered. Methods In MODIFY I/II (NCT01241552/NCT01513239), participants received a single infusion of bezlotoxumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo during anti-CDI treatment. Using pooled data from MODIFY I/II, initial clinical cure (ICC) and rCDI were assessed in metronidazole-, vancomycin-, and fidaxomicin-treated subgroups. Results Of 1554 participants in MODIFY I/II, 753 (48.5%) received metronidazole, 745 (47.9%) vancomycin, and 56 (3.6%) fidaxomicin. Fewer participants receiving metronidazole had a prior CDI episode in the previous 6 months (12.9%) or ≥1 risk factor for rCDI (66.0%) vs participants receiving vancomycin (41.2% and 83.6%, respectively) and fidaxomicin (55.4% and 89.3%, respectively). ICC rates were similar in the bezlotoxumab (metronidazole, 81.0%; vancomycin, 78.5%; fidaxomicin, 86.7%) and placebo groups (metronidazole, 81.3%; vancomycin, 79.6%; fidaxomicin, 76.9%). In placebo-treated participants, the rCDI was lower in the metronidazole subgroup vs the vancomycin and fidaxomicin subgroups (metronidazole, 28.0%; vancomycin, 38.4%; fidaxomicin, 35.0%). When analyzed by subsets based on history of CDI, rCDI rates were similar in the metronidazole and vancomycin groups. rCDI rates were lower in all antibiotic subgroups for bezlotoxumab vs placebo (metronidazole: rate difference [RD], –9.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], –16.4% to –3.1%; vancomycin: RD, –15.4%; 95% CI, –22.7% to –8.0%; fidaxomicin: RD, –11.9%; 95% CI, –38.1% to 14.3%). Conclusion Bezlotoxumab reduces rCDI vs placebo in participants receiving metronidazole and vancomycin, with a similar effect size in participants receiving fidaxomicin.

BACKGROUND: Efforts to prevent Clostridioides difficile infection continue to expand across the health care spectrum in the United States. Whether these efforts are reducing the national burden of C. difficile infection is unclear. METHODS: The Emerging Infections Program identified cases of C. difficile infection (stool specimens positive for C. difficile in a person ≥1 year of age with no positive test in the previous 8 weeks) in 10 U.S. sites. We used case and census sampling weights to estimate the national burden of C. difficile infection, first recurrences, hospitalizations, and in-hospital deaths from 2011 through 2017. Health care–associated infections were defined as those with onset in a health care facility or associated with recent admission to a health care facility; all others were classified as community-associated infections. For trend analyses, we used weighted random-intercept models with negative binomial distribution and logistic-regression models to adjust for the higher sensitivity of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) as compared with other test types. RESULTS: The number of cases of C. difficile infection in the 10 U.S. sites was 15,461 in 2011 (10,177 health care–associated and 5284 community-associated cases) and 15,512 in 2017 (7973 health care–associated and 7539 community-associated cases). The estimated national burden of C. difficile infection was 476,400 cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 419,900 to 532,900) in 2011 and 462,100 cases (95% CI, 428,600 to 495,600) in 2017. With accounting for NAAT use, the adjusted estimate of the total burden of C. difficile infection decreased by 24% (95% CI, 6 to 36) from 2011 through 2017; the adjusted estimate of the national burden of health care–associated C. difficile infection decreased by 36% (95% CI, 24 to 54), whereas the adjusted estimate of the national burden of community-associated C. difficile infection was unchanged. The adjusted estimate of the burden of hospitalizations for C. difficile infection decreased by 24% (95% CI, 0 to 48), whereas the adjusted estimates of the burden of first recurrences and in-hospital deaths did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated national burden of C. difficile infection and associated hospitalizations decreased from 2011 through 2017, owing to a decline in health care–associated infections. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.)

Background Bezlotoxumab reduced rates of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) vs placebo in Monoclonal Antibodies for C. difficile Therapy (MODIFY) I/II trial participants receiving antibacterial drug treatment for CDI. A secondary objective of MODIFY I/II was to assess bezlotoxumab’s efficacy against C. difficile strains associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality. Methods In this post-hoc analysis of pooled MODIFY I/II data, efficacy endpoints were assessed in participants infected with restriction endonuclease analysis BI and non-BI strains of C. difficile at study entry. Treatment outcomes were compared between participants receiving bezlotoxumab (alone or with actoxumab [B, B+A]) and those receiving no bezlotoxumab (placebo or actoxumab [P, A]). Results From 2559 randomized participants, C. difficile was isolated from 1588 (67.2%) baseline stool samples. Participants with BI strains (n = 328) were older and had more risk factors for rCDI than non-BI strain participants (n = 1260). There were no differences in initial clinical cure rate between BI and non-BI strains in either group. The rCDI rate for BI strains treated with bezlotoxumab was lower than for the no bezlotoxumab group (B, B+A vs P, A: 23.6% vs 43.9%) and was also lower for the non-BI strains (B, B+A vs P, A: 21.4% vs 36.1%). Rates of 30-day CDI-associated rehospitalization were greater with BI vs non-BI strains in both groups. Conclusions Infection with BI strains of C. difficile predicted poor outcomes in the MODIFY I/II trials. Bezlotoxumab (alone or with actoxumab) treatment was effective both in BI and non-BI subpopulations.

Background In phase 3 MODIFY I/II trials, bezlotoxumab significantly reduced recurrence of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (rCDI) over 12 weeks. Choice of CDI antibacterial treatment may affect CDI-related outcomes; therefore, this prespecified analysis assessed if the magnitude of bezlotoxumab-induced rCDI reduction was influenced by the antibiotic administered. Methods In MODIFY I/II (NCT01241552/NCT01513239), participants received a single infusion of bezlotoxumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo during anti-CDI treatment. Using pooled data from MODIFY I/II, initial clinical cure (ICC) and rCDI were assessed in metronidazole-, vancomycin-, and fidaxomicin-treated subgroups. Results Of 1554 participants in MODIFY I/II, 753 (48.5%) received metronidazole, 745 (47.9%) vancomycin, and 56 (3.6%) fidaxomicin. Fewer participants receiving metronidazole had a prior CDI episode in the previous 6 months (12.9%) or ≥1 risk factor for rCDI (66.0%) vs participants receiving vancomycin (41.2% and 83.6%, respectively) and fidaxomicin (55.4% and 89.3%, respectively). ICC rates were similar in the bezlotoxumab (metronidazole, 81.0%; vancomycin, 78.5%; fidaxomicin, 86.7%) and placebo groups (metronidazole, 81.3%; vancomycin, 79.6%; fidaxomicin, 76.9%). In placebo-treated participants, the rCDI was lower in the metronidazole subgroup vs the vancomycin and fidaxomicin subgroups (metronidazole, 28.0%; vancomycin, 38.4%; fidaxomicin, 35.0%). When analyzed by subsets based on history of CDI, rCDI rates were similar in the metronidazole and vancomycin groups. rCDI rates were lower in all antibiotic subgroups for bezlotoxumab vs placebo (metronidazole: rate difference [RD], –9.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], –16.4% to –3.1%; vancomycin: RD, –15.4%; 95% CI, –22.7% to –8.0%; fidaxomicin: RD, –11.9%; 95% CI, –38.1% to 14.3%). Conclusion Bezlotoxumab reduces rCDI vs placebo in participants receiving metronidazole and vancomycin, with a similar effect size in participants receiving fidaxomicin.

During a surveillance study of patients in a long-term care facility and the affiliated acute care hospital in the United States, we identified a Clostridioides difficile strain related to the epidemic PCR ribotype (RT) 027 strain associated with hospital outbreaks of severe disease. Fifteen patients were infected with this strain, characterized as restriction endonuclease analysis group DQ and RT591. Like RT027, DQ/RT591 contained genes for toxin B and binary toxin CDT and a tcdC gene of identical sequence. Whole-genome sequencing and multilocus sequence typing showed that DQ/RT591 is a member of the same multilocus sequence typing clade 2 as RT027 but in a separate cluster. DQ/RT591 produced a similar cytopathic effect as RT027 but showed delayed toxin production in vitro. DQ/RT591 was susceptible to moxifloxacin but highly resistant to clindamycin. Continued surveillance is warranted for this clindamycin-resistant strain that is related to the fluoroquinolone-resistant epidemic RT027 strain.

Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is an important cause of diarrheal disease associated with increasing morbidity and mortality. Efforts to develop a preventive vaccine are ongoing. The goal of this study was to develop an algorithm to identify patients at high risk of CDI for enrollment in a vaccine efficacy trial. Methods We conducted a 2-stage retrospective study of patients aged ≥ 50 within the US Department of Veterans Affairs Health system between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013. Included patients had at least 1 visit in each of the 2 years prior to the study, with no CDI in the past year. We used multivariable logistic regression with elastic net regularization to identify predictors of CDI in months 2–12 (i.e., days 31 – 365) to allow time for antibodies to develop. Performance was measured using the positive predictive value (PPV) and the area under the curve (AUC). Results Elements of the predictive algorithm included age, baseline comorbidity score, acute renal failure, recent infections or high-risk antibiotic use, hemodialysis in the last month, race, and measures of recent healthcare utilization. The final algorithm resulted in an AUC of 0.69 and a PPV of 3.4%. Conclusions We developed a predictive algorithm to identify a patient population with increased risk of CDI over the next 2–12 months. Our algorithm can be used prospectively with clinical and administrative data to facilitate the feasibility of conducting efficacy studies in a timely manner in an appropriate population.

Restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) and PCR ribotyping are two typing systems that have been frequently utilized for molecular epidemiologic characterization of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile. To correlate typing data obtained from each method, we performed both REA and PCR ribotyping on a large and diverse set of historical and contemporary C. difficile infection clinical isolates. Eighty isolates were selected from each reference laboratory in the United States (Microbiology Reference Laboratory, Hines VA Medical Center) and United Kingdom (Clostridium difficile Network for England and Northern Ireland laboratory, University of Leeds). The 160 isolates were assigned to 82 unique ribotypes and 51 unique REA groups (116 unique REA types). In general, concordance between typing methods was good. Dendrogram analysis of PCR ribotype band patterns demonstrated close genetic relationships among strain types with discordant REA and ribotype assignments. While REA typing was more discriminatory, several REA types in this study were further discriminated by PCR ribotyping, indicating that discriminatory value of these typing methods may be strain dependent. These data will assist with molecular epidemiologic surveillance of strains identified by these two commonly used C. difficile typing systems.

A panel of experts was convened by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) to update the 2010 clinical practice guideline on Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in adults. The update, which has incorporated recommendations for children (following the adult recommendations for epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment), includes significant changes in the management of this infection and reflects the evolving controversy over best methods for diagnosis. Clostridium difficile remains the most important cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea and has become the most commonly identified cause of healthcare-associated infection in adults in the United States. Moreover, C. difficile has established itself as an important community pathogen. Although the prevalence of the epidemic and virulent ribotype 027 strain has declined markedly along with overall CDI rates in parts of Europe, it remains one of the most commonly identified strains in the United States where it causes a sizable minority of CDIs, especially healthcare-associated CDIs. This guideline updates recommendations regarding epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, infection prevention, and environmental management.

Background Bezlotoxumab is a human monoclonal antibody against Clostridium difficile toxin B indicated to prevent C. difficile infection (CDI) recurrence (rCDI) in adults at high risk for rCDI. This post hoc analysis of pooled monocolonal antibodies for C.difficile therapy (MODIFY) I/II data assessed bezlotoxumab efficacy in participants with characteristics associated with increased risk for rCDI. Methods The analysis population was the modified intent-to-treat population who received bezlotoxumab or placebo (n = 1554) by risk factors for rCDI that were prespecified in the statistical analysis plan: age ≥65 years, history of CDI, compromised immunity, severe CDI, and ribotype 027/078/244. The proportion of participants with rCDI in 12 weeks, fecal microbiota transplant procedures, 30-day all cause and CDI-associated hospital readmissions, and mortality at 30 and 90 days after randomization were presented. Results The majority of enrolled participants (75.6%) had ≥1 risk factor; these participants were older and a higher proportion had comorbidities compared with participants with no risk factors. The proportion of placebo participants who experienced rCDI exceeded 30% for each risk factor compared with 20.9% among those without a risk factor, and the rCDI rate increased with the number of risk factors (1 risk factor: 31.3%; ≥3 risk factors: 46.1%). Bezlotoxumab reduced rCDI, fecal microbiota transplants, and CDI-associated 30-day readmissions in participants with risk factors for rCDI. Conclusions The risk factors prespecified in the MODIFY statistical analysis plan are appropriate to identify patients at high risk for rCDI. While participants with ≥3 risk factors had the greatest reduction of rCDI with bezlotoxumab, those with 1 or 2 risk factors may also benefit. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01241552 (MODIFY I) and NCT01513239 (MODIFY II)., Subgroup analyses from MODIFY confirmed that prior Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), age ≥65 years, infection with 027/078/244 strain, compromised immunity, and severe CDI are risk factors for recurrent CDI. Bezlotoxumab reduced CDI recurrence in participants with ≥1 risk factor compared with placebo.

Background Clostridium difficile strain DH/NAP11/106, a relatively antibiotic-susceptible strain, is now the most common cause of C. difficile infection (CDI) among adults in the USA. Objectives To identify mechanisms underlying the evolution and transmission of an MDR DH/NAP11/106 clone. Methods WGS (Illumina MiSeq), restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed on 134 C. difficile isolates collected from paediatric patients with CDI over a 2 year period. Results Thirty-one of 134 (23%) isolates were REA group DH. Pairwise single-nucleotide variant (SNV) analyses identified a DH clone causing seven instances of CDI in two patients. During the 337 days between the first and second CDI, Patient 1 (P1) received 313 days of antibiotic therapy. Clindamycin and rifaximin resistance, and reduced vancomycin susceptibility (MIC 0.5-2 mg/L), were newly identified in the relapsed isolate. This MDR clone was transmitted to Patient 2 (P2) while P1 and P2 received care in adjacent private rooms. P1 and P2 each developed two additional CDI relapses. Comparative genomics analyses demonstrated SNVs in multiple antibiotic resistance genes, including rpoB (rifaximin resistance), gyrB and a gene encoding PBP; gyrB and PBP mutations did not consistently confer a resistance phenotype. The clone also acquired a 46 000 bp genomic element, likely a conjugative plasmid, which contained ermB (clindamycin resistance). The element shared 99% identity with the genomic sequence of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, an enteric commensal. Conclusions These data highlight the emergence of MDR in C. difficile strain DH/NAP11/106 through multiple independent mechanisms probably as a consequence of profound antibiotic pressure.

Summary Background Clostridium difficile infection is the most common health-care-associated infection in the USA. We assessed the safety and efficacy of ridinilazole versus vancomycin for treatment of C difficile infection. Methods We did a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study. Participants with signs and symptoms of C difficile infection and a positive diagnostic test result were recruited from 33 centres in the USA and Canada and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral ridinilazole (200 mg every 12 h) or oral vancomycin (125 mg every 6 h) for 10 days. The primary endpoint was achievement of a sustained clinical response, defined as clinical cure at the end of treatment and no recurrence within 30 days, which was used to establish non-inferiority (15% margin) of ridinilazole versus vancomycin. The primary efficacy analysis was done on a modified intention-to-treat population comprising all individuals with C difficile infection confirmed by the presence of free toxin in stool who were randomly assigned to receive one or more doses of the study drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02092935. Findings Between June 26, 2014, and August 31, 2015, 100 patients were recruited; 50 were randomly assigned to receive ridinilazole and 50 to vancomycin. 16 patients did not complete the study, and 11 discontinued treatment early. The primary efficacy analysis included 69 patients (n=36 in the ridinilazole group; n=33 in the vancomycin group). 24 of 36 (66·7%) patients in the ridinilazole group versus 14 of 33 (42·4%) of those in the vancomycin group had a sustained clinical response (treatment difference 21·1%, 90% CI 3·1–39·1, p=0·0004), establishing the non-inferiority of ridinilazole and also showing statistical superiority at the 10% level. Ridinilazole was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of vancomycin: 82% (41 of 50) of participants reported adverse events in the ridinilazole group and 80% (40 of 50) in the vancomycin group. There were no adverse events related to ridinilazole that led to discontinuation. Interpretation Ridinilazole is a targeted-spectrum antimicrobial that shows potential in treatment of initial C difficile infection and in providing sustained benefit through reduction in disease recurrence. Further clinical development is warranted. Funding Wellcome Trust and Summit Therapeutics.

We retrospectively studied vancomycin taper and pulse treatment on 100 consecutive, evaluable patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Following taper to once-daily vancomycin dosing, 22 of 36 patients (61%) who received every-other-day dosing (QOD) and 50 of 64 (81%) who received QOD followed by every-third-day dosing were cured (P = .03).