1. Impact of BCR::ABL1 transcript type on RT-qPCR amplification performance and molecular response to therapy
- Author
-
Matthew Salmon, Helen E. White, Hana Zizkova, Andrea Gottschalk, Eliska Motlova, Nuno Cerveira, Dolors Colomer, Daniel Coriu, Georg N. Franke, Enrico Gottardi, Barbara Izzo, Tomas Jurcek, Thomas Lion, Vivien Schäfer, Claudia Venturi, Paolo Vigneri, Magdalena Zawada, Jan Zuna, Lenka Hovorkova, Jitka Koblihova, Hana Klamova, Marketa Stastna Markova, Dana Srbova, Adela Benesova, Vaclava Polivkova, Daniela Zackova, Jiri Mayer, Ingo Roeder, Ingmar Glauche, Thomas Ernst, Andreas Hochhaus, Katerina Machova Polakova, Nicholas C. P. Cross, Salmon, M, White, He, Zizkova, H, Gottschalk, A, Motlova, E, Cerveira, N, Colomer, D, Coriu, D, Franke, Gn, Gottardi, E, Izzo, B, Jurcek, T, Lion, T, Schäfer, V, Venturi, C, Vigneri, P, Zawada, M, Zuna, J, Hovorkova, L, Koblihova, J, Klamova, H, Markova, M, Srbova, D, Benesova, A, Polivkova, V, Zackova, D, Mayer, J, Roeder, I, Glauche, I, Ernst, T, Hochhaus, A, Polakova, Km, and Cross, Ncp
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,Neoplasm, Residual ,Oncology ,Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive ,hemic and lymphatic diseases ,Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl ,Imatinib Mesylate ,Humans ,Hematology ,Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - Abstract
Several studies have reported that chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients expressing e14a2 BCR::ABL1 have a faster molecular response to therapy compared to patients expressing e13a2. To explore the reason for this difference we undertook a detailed technical comparison of the commonly used Europe Against Cancer (EAC) BCR::ABL1 reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay in European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) reference laboratories (n = 10). We found the amplification ratio of the e13a2 amplicon was 38% greater than e14a2 (p = 0.015), and the amplification efficiency was 2% greater (P = 0.17). This subtle difference led to measurable transcript-type dependent variation in estimates of residual disease which could be corrected by (i) taking the qPCR amplification efficiency into account, (ii) using alternative RT-qPCR approaches or (iii) droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), a technique which is relatively insensitive to differences in amplification kinetics. In CML patients, higher levels of BCR::ABL1/GUSB were identified at diagnosis for patients expressing e13a2 (n = 67) compared to e14a2 (n = 78) when analysed by RT-qPCR (P = 0.0005) but not ddPCR (P = 0.5). These data indicate that widely used RT-qPCR assays result in subtly different estimates of disease depending on BCR::ABL1 transcript type; these differences are small but may need to be considered for optimal patient management.
- Published
- 2022