Search

The operative challenges presented by large hiatal defects require that surgeons have an expansive armamentarium of tools with which to approach the crural closure. When crural closure cannot be achieved primarily, our experience suggests that use of diaphragm relaxing incisions can facilitate primary crural closure, contributing to decreasing the risk of recurrence following hiatal or paraesophageal hernia repair. Here, we present our method for identifying patients who would benefit from a diaphragm relaxing incision, as well as the technique for performing both a right and left diaphragm relaxing incision.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to provide a full HRM data set in patients with a normal functioning fundoplication. BACKGROUND The Chicago classification was devised to correlate High Resolution Manometry (HRM) values to the clinical status of patients with swallowing disorder. However, it is unclear whether those values are applicable after fundoplication as the literature is sparse. METHODS We identified patients with pre- and postoperative HRM who had a normal functioning primary fundoplication as defined by 1) resolution of preoperative symptoms without significant postoperative side effects, 2) no dysphagia reported on a standardized questionnaire given on the day of the postoperative HRM and 3) normal acid exposure determined objectively by esophageal pH-testing. RESULTS Fifty patients met inclusion criteria for the study. Thirty-three patients (66%) underwent complete fundoplication and 17 patients (34%) underwent posterior partial fundoplication. Postoperative HRM was performed at a median of 12 months after primary surgery. LES values significantly increased with the addition of a fundoplication. Median IRP was 14mmHg (p = 0.0001), median resting pressure 19.5mmHg (p = 0.0263) and median total length LES was 3.95 cm (p = 0.0098). The 95th percentile for IRP in a complete fundoplication was 29 vs. 23mmHg in a partial fundoplication (p = 0.3667). CONCLUSION We offer a new standard manometric profile for a normally functioning fundoplication which provides a necessary benchmark for analyzing postoperative problems with a fundoplication. The previously accepted upper limit defining esophageal outflow obstruction (IRP > 20mmHg) is not clinically applicable after fundoplication as the majority of patients in this dysphagia-free cohort exceeded this value. Interestingly, there does not appear to be a significant difference in HRM LES values between complete and partial fundoplication.

The short-term success of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is well documented but the durability of the operation is questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the POEM procedure for esophageal motility disorders in a large cohort in which all patients had at least 5 years of follow-up. All patients from a single center who underwent a POEM between October 2010 and September 2014 were followed for long-term clinical outcomes. Postoperative Eckardt symptom scores of short term and ≥ 5 years were collected through phone interview. Clinical success was defined as an Eckardt score

The magnetic sphincter augmentation device (MSA) provides effective relief of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Dysphagia after MSA implantation sometimes prompts endoscopic dilation. The manufacturer’s instructions are that it be performed 6 or more weeks after implantation under fluoroscopic guidance to not more than 15 mm keeping 3 or more beads closed. The purpose of this study was to assess adherence to these recommendations and explore the techniques used and outcomes after MSA dilation. We conducted a multicenter retrospective review of patients undergoing dilation for dysphagia after MSA placement from 2012 to 2018. A total of 144 patients underwent 245 dilations. The median size of MSA placed was 14 beads (range 12–17) and the median time to dilation was 175 days. A second dilation was performed in 67 patients, 22 patients had a third dilation and 7 patients underwent 4 or more dilations. In total, 17 devices (11.8%) were eventually explanted. The majority of dilations were performed with a balloon dilator (81%). The median dilator size was 18 mm and 73.4% were done with a dilator larger than 15 mm. There was no association between dilator size and need for subsequent dilation. Fluoroscopy was used in 28% of cases. There were no perforations or device erosions related to dilation. There is no clinical credence to the manufacturer’s recommendation for the use of fluoroscopy and limitation to 15 mm when dilating a patient for dysphagia after MSA implantation. Use of a larger size dilator was not associated with perforation or device erosion, but also did not reduce the need for repeat dilation. Given this, we would recommend that the initial dilation for any size MSA device be done using a 15 mm through-the-scope balloon dilator. Dysphagia prompting dilation after MSA implantation is associated with nearly a 12% risk of device explantation.

The aim was to evaluate the clinical significance of multiple rapid swallows (MRS) during high-resolution manometry (HRM) prior to fundoplication. Despite pre-operative HRM, up to 38% of patients report post-fundoplication dysphagia. Suggestion that MRS improves prediction of dysphagia after fundoplication has not been investigated when using a tailored approach. We hypothesize response to MRS is predictive of dysphagia after tailored fundoplication.A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients undergoing HRM with MRS provocation 5/2019-7/2021 at a single institution. Patients who underwent subsequent index laparoscopic fundoplication, without peptic stricture or achalasia, were included. After performing standard 10-swallow HRM, MRS provocation was performed. Patient-reported dysphagia frequency scores were collected at initial consultation and post-operative follow-up. At least weekly symptoms were considered clinically significant. Normal MRS response was defined as adequate deglutitive inhibition and MRS contractile response. Fundoplications were tailored based on standard HRM values.HRM was performed in 1201 patients, 220 met inclusion criteria. Clinically significant pre-operative dysphagia was reported by 85 (38.6%). Patients undergoing partial fundoplication (n = 123, 55.9%) had lower mean distal contractile integer, distal esophageal contraction amplitude, and percent peristalsis (p 0.005). Post-operatively, 120 (54.5%) were without dysphagia, 59 (26.8%) had improved dysphagia, 26 (11.8%) had unchanged dysphagia, and 15 (6.8%) reported new dysphagia. There was no statistical difference in early or late dysphagia outcome between tailored fundoplication groups (p = 0.69). On univariate and multivariate analysis, neither MRS response, nor standard HRM metrics were significantly associated with post-operative dysphagia. Younger age (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.986, p = 0.042) and the presence of pre-operative dysphagia (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.17-5.65, p = 0.015) were significant predictors of post-operative dysphagia.The risk of clinically significant dysphagia post-fundoplication is low when using a tailored approach based on standard HRM metrics. Additional data provided by MRS does not add to surgical decision-making using the investigated approach.

Introduction: Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR) has a reported recurrence rate of nearly 50%. While the etiology of these recurrences is multifactorial, obesity likely plays a role. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on hiatal hernia recurrence following LPEHR. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected foregut surgical database identified patients who underwent a primary standard elective LPEHR between 2006 and 2012 and objective follow up >12 months after surgery. Hernia recurrence was defined as >2 cm axial displacement of fundoplication/stomach above the diaphragm on barium swallow/endoscopy. Data was analyzed based on BMI. Results: Of 236/350 (67%) who had long term-objective follow-up (mean 34 months), the overall recurrence rate was 24%. Recurrence rates were lower for patients with normal BMI (10.8% vs 26.1%, P 25 than for normal weight individuals. There was no difference in recurrence rates based BMI 35. Conclusions: Patients with a normal BMI experience significantly lower recurrence rates following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. The increased risk appears to be similar across BMI categories, including individuals who do not meet criteria for formal weight loss surgery. Therefore, a BMI greater than 35 alone is not a reliable demarcation of recurrence risk. Efforts to achieve normal weight pre-operatively are recommended to minimize recurrences.

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) is associated with a low morbidity and mortality but an objective hernia recurrence rate in excess of 50% at 5 years. Biologic mesh has not been shown to reduce hernia recurrence rates. Recently, a new bioresorbable mesh made with poly-4-hydroxybutyrate with a Sepra-Technology coating on one side (Phasix-ST mesh) has become available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and short-term efficacy of Phasix-ST mesh for reinforcement of the primary crural closure in patients undergoing elective, laparoscopic PEH repair. A prospective database was initiated and maintained for all patients undergoing PEH repair with the use of Phasix-ST mesh. We retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutive patients who had an elective, first-time laparoscopic PEH repair with Phasix-ST mesh and who completed their 1-year objective follow-up study. Patients having a reoperation, non-laparoscopic repair, or who failed to comply with the objective follow-up were excluded. To achieve the desired 50 patients with 1-year objective follow-up, we reviewed the records of 90 consecutive PEH patients. In the final cohort of 50 patients, there were 32 females (64%) and 18 males. The median age of the patients at surgery was 67 years (range 44–84). The operation was PEH repair with fundoplication alone in 29 patients (58%) and PEH repair with Collis gastroplasty and fundoplication in 21 patients (42%). Phasix-ST mesh was used for crural reinforcement in all patients, and there were no intraoperative issues with the mesh or any difficulty placing or fixating the mesh at the hiatus. A diaphragm relaxing incision was performed in 2 patients (4%). The mean length of hospital stay was 2.8 days, and there was no major morbidity or mortality. On the 1-year objective follow-up study (median 12 months) a recurrent hernia was found in 4 patients (8%). No patient that had a Collis gastroplasty or a relaxing incision had a recurrent hernia. No patient had a reoperation. No patient had a mesh infection or mesh erosion. Phasix-ST mesh reinforcement of the crural closure during laparoscopic primary, elective PEH repair was associated with no adverse mesh-related events such as infection or erosion. Phasix-ST crural reinforcement in combination with tension-reduction techniques when necessary resulted in a very low (8%) objective hernia recurrence rate at a median follow-up of 1 year. These results demonstrate the safety of Phasix-ST mesh for use at the hiatus for crural reinforcement. This safety, along with the encouraging short-term efficacy for reducing hernia recurrence, should encourage further studies using the combination of resorbable biosynthetic mesh crural reinforcement and tension-reducing techniques during repair of paraesophageal hernias.

Background: Patients, surgeons, and payers are interested in reducing hospital length of stay. Outpatient laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) can be done safely and cost effectively. There is low acceptance of this practice due to fear of readmission and patient dissatisfaction. Our aim was to identify factors predicting failure of same-day discharge after LF. Methods and Procedures: We simulated an outpatient setting for patients who underwent LF from 2017 to 2018 and collected the data prospectively. A perioperative pain and nausea protocol was utilized. Postoperatively, patients were given a liquid diet and oral medications, observed overnight, and then discharged after standard criteria were met. Failure was defined by the need for physician intervention after 3 hours or failure to discharge. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed assessing factors associated with failure. Two-sample t-test and chi-squared tests were used for significance. Results: Ninety-eight patients were included. Twenty patients failed, primarily due to the need for intravenous medications. Seven were discharged on postoperative day 1 but required physician intervention after 3 hours. Thirteen patients stayed >23 hours. Two patients were readmitted within 1 week of discharge. There was one acute recurrence, requiring reoperation, and one conversion to laparotomy. We found no statistically significant patient risk factor, comorbidity, or perioperative variable that could reliably predict failure of same-day discharge. Conclusion: This study suggests that same-day discharge after LF is safe and feasible. However, 20% of patients will unpredictably fail to meet discharge criteria.

The short-term success of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is well documented but the durability of the operation is questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the POEM procedure for esophageal motility disorders in a large cohort in which all patients had at least 5 years of follow-up.All patients from a single center who underwent a POEM between October 2010 and September 2014 were followed for long-term clinical outcomes. Postoperative Eckardt symptom scores of short term and ≥ 5 years were collected through phone interview. Clinical success was defined as an Eckardt score 3. Overall success was defined as Eckardt score 3 and freedom from additional interventions.Of 138 patients, 100 patients were available for follow-up (mean age 56, 52% male). The indication for operation was achalasia in 94. The mean follow-up duration was 75 months (range: 60-106 months). Dysphagia was improved in 91% of patients. Long-term overall success was achieved in 79% of patients (80% of achalasia patients, 67% of DES patients). Preoperative mean Eckardt score was 6. At 6 months, it was 1, and at 75 months, it was 2 (p = 0.204). Five-year freedom from intervention was 96%. Overall, 7 patients had additional treatments: 1 balloon dilation (35 mm), 4 laparoscopic Heller myotomy, and 2 redo POEM at a mean of 51 months post-POEM. Ninety-three percent expressed complete satisfaction with POEM.A multitude of studies has shown the early benefits of POEM. Here, we show that nearly 80% of patients report clinical success with no significant decrement in symptom scores between their short- and long-term follow-up. Clearly POEM is an effective option for achalasia with durable long-term treatment efficacy.

The magnetic sphincter augmentation device (MSA) provides effective relief of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Dysphagia after MSA implantation sometimes prompts endoscopic dilation. The manufacturer's instructions are that it be performed 6 or more weeks after implantation under fluoroscopic guidance to not more than 15 mm keeping 3 or more beads closed. The purpose of this study was to assess adherence to these recommendations and explore the techniques used and outcomes after MSA dilation.We conducted a multicenter retrospective review of patients undergoing dilation for dysphagia after MSA placement from 2012 to 2018.A total of 144 patients underwent 245 dilations. The median size of MSA placed was 14 beads (range 12-17) and the median time to dilation was 175 days. A second dilation was performed in 67 patients, 22 patients had a third dilation and 7 patients underwent 4 or more dilations. In total, 17 devices (11.8%) were eventually explanted. The majority of dilations were performed with a balloon dilator (81%). The median dilator size was 18 mm and 73.4% were done with a dilator larger than 15 mm. There was no association between dilator size and need for subsequent dilation. Fluoroscopy was used in 28% of cases. There were no perforations or device erosions related to dilation.There is no clinical credence to the manufacturer's recommendation for the use of fluoroscopy and limitation to 15 mm when dilating a patient for dysphagia after MSA implantation. Use of a larger size dilator was not associated with perforation or device erosion, but also did not reduce the need for repeat dilation. Given this, we would recommend that the initial dilation for any size MSA device be done using a 15 mm through-the-scope balloon dilator. Dysphagia prompting dilation after MSA implantation is associated with nearly a 12% risk of device explantation.

Endoscopic evaluation of patients preparing to undergo bariatric procedures is an important component in optimizing overall care. Although colonic pathology exists in bariatric patients as it does in the general population, this chapter focuses on the role of preoperative endoscopy involving bariatric surgical anatomy of the foregut. The role of endoscopy in bariatric surgery begins well before a patient undergoes an index surgical procedure. Many centers have adopted a policy of screening patients endoscopically before index bariatric procedures to decrease the risk of missing foregut pathology that should be addressed before bariatric surgery.

Background Post-operative pain control and narcotic over-utilization are challenging issues for surgeons in all fields. While virtual reality (VR) has been increasingly applied in various fields, its feasibility and efficacy in the peri-operative period has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to examine the experience of an integrated VR protocol in the perioperative setting. Methods Patients undergoing minimally invasive foregut surgery at a single institution were randomized to receive a series of VR meditation/mindfulness sessions (VR) or to standard care after surgery (non-VR). Post-operative pain levels, narcotic utilization and patient satisfaction were tracked. Results Fifty-two patients were enrolled with 26 in each arm. Post-operative pain scores, total narcotic utilization, and overall satisfaction scores were not significantly different between the two groups. For patients in the VR arm, sessions were able to be incorporated into the perioperative routine with little disruption. Most (73.9 %) were able complete all six VR sessions and reported low pain, anxiety, and nausea scores while using the device. A high proportion responded that they would use VR again (76.2 %) or would like a VR program designed for pain (62.0 %). There were no complications from device usage. Conclusion VR is a safe and simple intervention that is associated with high patient satisfaction and is feasible to implement in the perioperative setting. While the current study is underpowered to detect difference in narcotic utilization, this device holds promise as an adjuvant tool in multimodal pain and anxiety control in the peri-operative period.

Background Little is known about the initial development and natural history of a hiatal hernia. Methods A database containing 12,050 upper gastrointestinal (UGI) studies dating from 1991 to 2013 was queried to identify patients that had more than one study a minimum of 5 years apart showing a hernia. The x-ray films or digital images were reviewed and the type and size of any hernia determined. Results There were 56 patients with 133 UGI studies. On initial UGI; 13 patients had no hernia, 35 patients had a sliding hernia (SH), and 8 patients had a paraesophageal hernia (PEH). Follow-up UGI results are shown in the Figure. A third or fourth UGI study was available for 17 patients. Over a median of 41 months, the most recent UGI showed that the majority (78%) of SH increased in size, with 1 changing to PEH. Among patients with PEH, 2 were already completely intrathoracic stomachs and on most recent UGI 4 of the remaining 6 increased in size with 1 turning into complete intrathoracic stomach. Conclusion Most PEHs (77%) started out as a SH. Over time the majority of both SH and PEH increase in size, with many PEH becoming completely intrathoracic stomachs. Given the risks associated with a PEH, patients with SH should be re-evaluated for progression of their hernia. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Endoscopic leaks and fistulas remain a persistent clinical concern. Treatment that was once surgical is now primarily endoscopic. A variety of new tools and approaches has made endoscopic treatment of these troublesome problems increasingly effective. Stents, glues, clips, and even suturing are now routinely available. While these problems require persistence, with patience and persistence, the majority of these issues can be resolved endoscopically.

In current bariatric surgical practices, the potential assistive role of upper endoscopy occurs on a daily basis. Although colonic pathology exists in bariatric patients as it does in the general population, this chapter focuses on the role of endoscopy involving bariatric surgical anatomy of the foregut. The role of endoscopy in bariatric surgery begins well before a patient undergoes an index surgical procedure. Four roles of upper endoscopy in the care of the bariatric surgical patient will be discussed: (1) preoperative, (2) intraoperative, (3), postoperative, and (4) forensic endoscopy. Emerging roles for flexible endoscopy in the development of new bariatric surgical approaches will also be addressed.

In the presence of esophageal pathology, there is risk of worse outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG). This study reviewed how an esophageal workup affected a bariatric operative plan in patients with concurrent esophageal pathology. We retrospectively reviewed patients planning bariatric surgery referred with significant reflux, dysphagia, and hiatal hernia (>3 cm) to determine how and why a thorough esophageal workup changed a bariatric operative plan. We identified 79 patients for analysis from 2009 to 2013. In 10/41 patients (24.3 %) planning LAGB and 5/9 patients planning SG (55.5 %), a Roux was preferred because of severe symptoms of reflux and aspiration, dysphagia, manometric abnormalities (aperistaltic or hypoperistaltic esophagus with low mean wave amplitudes), large hiatal hernia (>5 cm), and/or presence of Barrett’s esophagus. Patients without these characteristics had a decreased risk of foregut symptoms after surgery. We recommend a thorough esophageal workup in bariatric patients with known preoperative esophageal pathology. The operative plan might need to be changed to a Roux to prevent adverse outcomes including dysphagia, severe reflux, or suboptimal weight loss. An esophageal workup may improve surgical decision making and improve patient outcomes.

During hiatal hernia repair there are two vectors of tension: axial and radial. An optimal repair minimizes the tension along these vectors. Radial tension is not easily recognized. There are no simple maneuvers like measuring length that facilitate assessment of radial tension. The aims of this project were to: (1) establish a simple intraoperative method to evaluate baseline tension of the diaphragmatic hiatal muscle closure; and, (2) assess if tension is reduced by relaxing maneuvers and if so, to what degree.Diaphragmatic characteristics and tension were assessed during hiatal hernia repair with a tension gage. We compared tension measured after hiatal dissection and after relaxing maneuvers were performed.Sixty-four patients (29 M:35F) underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. Baseline hiatal width was 2.84 cm and tension 13.6 dag. There was a positive correlation between hiatal width and tension (r = 0.55) but the strength of association was low (r (2) = 0.31). Four different hiatal shapes (slit, teardrop, "D", and oval) were identified and appear to influence tension and the need for relaxing incision. Tension was reduced by 35.8 % after a left pleurotomy (12 patients); by 46.2 % after a right crural relaxing incision (15 patients); and by 56.1 % if both maneuvers were performed (6 patients).Tension on the diaphragmatic hiatus can be measured with a novel device. There was a limited correlation with width of the hiatal opening. Relaxing maneuvers such as a left pleurotomy or a right crural relaxing incision reduced tension. Longer term follow-up will determine whether outcomes are improved by quantifying and reducing radial tension.

Axial shortening of the esophagus is caused by repetitive esophageal injury from gastroesophageal reflux disease resulting in esophagitis, submucosal fibrosis, and esophageal dysmotility. A short esophagus (2 cm of intraabdominal length after type II mediastinal dissection) is encountered in 20% to 63% of patients undergoing paraesophageal hernia repair. An esophageal lengthening procedure can be a useful adjunct to fundoplication to reduce the 50% recurrence rate reported at 5 years. We describe a simplified Collis gastroplasty technique that negates the need for wedge fundectomy, potentially saving operating room time and cost, while hypothetically reducing morbidity.