Search

Your search keyword '"Daniel Tatay"' showing total 4 results
Start Over Author "Daniel Tatay"
4 results on '"Daniel Tatay"'

1. Essential Emergency and Critical Care: a consensus among global clinical experts

Author

Samuel Akech, Mike English, Thomas G Weiser, Adam D Laytin, Niranjan Kissoon, Jaran Eriksen, Lovenish Bains, Fred Bulamba, Claudia Hanson, Maria Jirwe, Jolene Moore, Mpoki Ulisubisya, Vincent Ioos, Kent Doi, Lee A Wallis, Tom Bashford, Kapil Dev Soni, Nobhojit Roy, Franco Diaz, Mulinda Nyirenda, Nicholas Risko, Hendry R Sawe, Jacob McKnight, Alexandra Wharton-Smith, Jamie Rylance, Monty Khajanchi, Gavin Wooldridge, Emmanuel Fru Nsutebu, Lisa Kurland, Peter Baker, John C Marshall, Kathryn Rowan, Usha Lalla, Balasubramanian Venkatesh, Cornelius Sendagire, Neill KJ Adhikari, Tim Baker, Brian Rice, Josephine Langton, Elisabeth Riviello, Fiona Muttalib, Francis Mupeta, Jacquie Oliwa, Stefan Swartling Peterson, Andrew G Smith, Lorna Guinness, Megan Cox, Wim Van Damme, John Kellett, Elizabeth M Molyneux, Richard Venn, Andrea B Pembe, Mervyn Mer, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Raymond Towey, Lina Zhang, Blaise Pascal, Hiral A Shah, Carl Otto Schell, Karima Khalid, Paul D Sonenthal, Alex Sanga, Raphael K. Kayambankadzanja, Adam Asghar, Adrian J Holloway, Ahmed Rhassane El Adib, Alexia Michaelides, Alvaro Coronado Munoz, Amos Muzuka, Analía Fernández, Andreas Wellhagen, Anita Gadgil, Anna Hvarfner, Anuja Abayadeera, Asya Agulnik, Aurélie Godard, Bargo Mahamat Yousif, Bhakti Sarang Ben Morton, Bharath Kumar, Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Bobby King, C Louise Thwaites, Chian Wern Tai, Christian Owoo, Dan Brun Petersen, Daniel Tatay, David Lee Skinner, Denis Kinyua, Dhruva Ghosh, Diptesh Aryal, Donald Mlombwa, Duyen Thi, Hanh Bui, Edwin R Lugazia, Ellena Heyns, Erika Montalvo, Ernesto Gerardo Moreno, Esther Banda Kanyangira, Furaha Nzanzu, Gibonce Mwakisambwe, Guy A Richards, Hala Ammar, Halinder S Mangat, Hasanein H Ghali, Hoi Ping Shum, Ibrahim Salim Abdullahi, Ingrid T von der Osten, James S Lee, Jane Kasozi Namagga, Jasmine Armour-Marshall, John Z Metcalfe, Jonas Blixt, Juan Gutierrez Mejia, Juan Ignacio Silesky-Jiménez, Karl Martin Kohne, Kazuhiro Yokobatake, Kristina E. Rudd, Kwame Asante Akuamoah-Boateng, Lars Irestedt, Lia I Losonczy, Margaret Nyaika, Markus Castegren, Matthew Loftus, Matti Reinikainen, Michael Jaung, Michael S Lipnick, Miklos Lipcey, Märit Amanda Halmin, Naman Shah, Natalie L Cobb, Nathan D Nielsen, Neville Vlok, Ntogwiachu Daniel Kobuh, Oscar Fernández Rostello, Patricia Duque, Paul Patrick Mwasapi, Petronella Bjurling-Sjöberg, Piedad Sarmiento, Pryanka Relan, Rebecca Silvers, Rehema Mlay, Rich Branson, Richard J Wang, Richard Kojan, Richard Peter Von Rahden, Rob Mac Sweeney, Rodrigo Genaro Arduini, Rodwell Gundo, Ruyumbu Sixtus, Samson Kwazizira Mndolo, Shada A. Rouhani, Siriel Nanzia Massawe, Steven A Webb, Sunkaru Touray, Susana Guido, Teresa Kortz, Theodoros Aslanidis, Traci A Wolbrink, V Theodore Barnett, Vijay Christopher Kannan, Waleed S Eldebsy, Wangari Waweru-Siika, Wezzie Kumwenda Mwafulirwa, William Obeng, Yasein Omer, and Zione Banda

Subjects
Medicine (General), R5-920, Infectious and parasitic diseases, RC109-216
Abstract

Background Globally, critical illness results in millions of deaths every year. Although many of these deaths are potentially preventable, the basic, life-saving care of critically ill patients are often overlooked in health systems. Essential Emergency and Critical Care (EECC) has been devised as the care that should be provided to all critically ill patients in all hospitals in the world. EECC includes the effective care of low cost and low complexity for the identification and treatment of critically ill patients across all medical specialties. This study aimed to specify the content of EECC and additionally, given the surge of critical illness in the ongoing pandemic, the essential diagnosis-specific care for critically ill patients with COVID-19.Methods In a Delphi process, consensus (>90% agreement) was sought from a diverse panel of global clinical experts. The panel iteratively rated proposed treatments and actions based on previous guidelines and the WHO/ICRC’s Basic Emergency Care. The output from the Delphi was adapted iteratively with specialist reviewers into a coherent and feasible package of clinical processes plus a list of hospital readiness requirements.Results The 269 experts in the Delphi panel had clinical experience in different acute medical specialties from 59 countries and from all resource settings. The agreed EECC package contains 40 clinical processes and 67 requirements, plus additions specific for COVID-19.Conclusion The study has specified the content of care that should be provided to all critically ill patients. Implementing EECC could be an effective strategy for policy makers to reduce preventable deaths worldwide.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Hypokalemia. Risk of generation for treatments

Author

Horacio A. Repetto, Luciana Brenzoni, and Daniel Tatay

Subjects
hipokalemia, tratamiento, terapia, pediatría, niños, Medicine, Specialties of internal medicine, RC581-951
Published
2017

3. PP101 [Global health » Resource limited settings]: DEFINING PEDIATRIC CRITICAL ILLNESS FOR RESEARCH ACROSS RESOURCE VARIABLE SETTINGS: A MODIFIED DELPHI CONSENSUS

Author

A. V. Arias, M. Lintner Rivera, N. I. Shafi, A. Anwar, A. T. Bhutta, T. Bleakly Kortz, A. Agulnik, O. (Qalab Abbas, Hafeez Abdelhafeez, Muhammad Ali, Hala Ammar, John Appiah, Jonah Attebery, Willmer Diaz Villalobos, Daiane Ferreira, Sebastián González Dambrauskas, Muhammad Irfan Habib, Jan Hau Lee, Niranjan Kissoon, Atnafu Mekonnen Tekleab, Elizabeth M. Molyneux, Brenda M. Morrow, Vinay M. Nadkarni, Jocelyn Rivera, Rebecca Silvers, Mardi Steere, and Daniel Tatay)

Subjects
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2022

4. Model for regional collaboration: Successful strategy to implement a pediatric early warning system in 36 pediatric oncology centers in Latin America

Author

Asya, Agulnik, Alejandra, Gonzalez Ruiz, Hilmarie, Muniz-Talavera, Angela K, Carrillo, Adolfo, Cárdenas, Maria F, Puerto-Torres, Marcela, Garza, Tania, Conde, Dora J, Soberanis Vasquez, Alejandra, Méndez Aceituno, Carlos, Acuña Aguirre, Yvania, Alfonso, Shillel Yahamy, Álvarez Arellano, Deiby, Argüello Vargas, Rosario, Batista, Erika Esther, Blasco Arriaga, Mayra, Chávez Rios, María Elena, Cuencio Rodríguez, Ever Amilcar, Fing Soto, Wendy, Gómez-García, Rafael H, Guillén Villatoro, María de Lourdes, Gutiérrez Rivera, Martha, Herrera Almanza, Yajaira V, Jimenez Antolinez, Maria Susana, Juárez Tobias, Norma Araceli, López Facundo, Ruth Angélica, Martínez Soria, Kenia, Miller, Scheybi, Miralda, Roxana, Morales, Natalia, Negroe Ocampo, Alejandra, Osuna, Claudia, Pascual Morales, Clara Krystal, Pérez Fermin, Carlos M, Pérez Alvarado, Estuardo, Pineda, Carlos, Andrés Portilla, Ligia Estefanía, Rios López, Jocelyn, Rivera, Arely Saraí, Sagaón Olivares, Mélida Cristina, Saguay Tacuri, Beatriz T, Salas Mendoza, Ivel, Solano Picado, Verónica, Soto Chávez, Isidoro, Tejocote Romero, Daniel, Tatay, Juliana, Teixeira Costa, Erika, Villanueva, Marielba, Villegas Pacheco, Virginia R, McKay, Monika L, Metzger, Paola, Friedrich, and Carlos, Rodriguez-Galindo

Subjects
Hospitalization, Cancer Research, Latin America, Oncology, Neoplasms, Humans, Child, Medical Oncology, Hospitals, Pediatric
Abstract

Pediatric early warning systems (PEWS) aid in the early identification of deterioration in hospitalized children with cancer; however, they are under-used in resource-limited settings. The authors use the knowledge-to-action framework to describe the implementation strategy for Proyecto Escala de Valoracion de Alerta Temprana (EVAT), a multicenter quality-improvement collaborative, to scale-up PEWS in pediatric oncology centers in Latin America.Proyecto EVAT mentored participating centers through an adaptable implementation strategy to: (1) monitor clinical deterioration in children with cancer, (2) contextually adapt PEWS, (3) assess barriers to using PEWS, (4) pilot and implement PEWS, (5) monitor the use of PEWS, (6) evaluate outcomes, and (7) sustain PEWS. The implementation outcomes assessed included the quality of PEWS use, the time required for implementation, and global program impact.From April 2017 to October 2021, 36 diverse Proyecto EVAT hospitals from 13 countries in Latin America collectively managing more than 4100 annual new pediatric cancer diagnoses successfully implemented PEWS. The time to complete all program phases varied among centers, averaging 7 months (range, 3-13 months) from PEWS pilot to implementation completion. All centers ultimately implemented PEWS and maintained high-quality PEWS use for up to 18 months after implementation. Across the 36 centers, more than 11,100 clinicians were trained in PEWS, and more than 41,000 pediatric hospital admissions had PEWS used in their care.Evidence-based interventions like PEWS can be successfully scaled-up regionally basis using a systematic approach that includes a collaborative network, an adaptable implementation strategy, and regional mentorship. Lessons learned can guide future programs to promote the widespread adoption of effective interventions and reduce global disparities in childhood cancer outcomes.Pediatric early warning systems (PEWS) are clinical tools used to identify deterioration in hospitalized children with cancer; however, implementation challenges limit their use in resource-limited settings. Proyecto EVAT is a multicenter quality-improvement collaborative to implement PEWS in 36 pediatric oncology centers in Latin America. This is the first multicenter, multinational study reporting a successful implementation strategy (Proyecto EVAT) to regionally scale-up PEWS. The lessons learned from Proyecto EVAT can inform future programs to promote the adoption of clinical interventions to globally improve childhood cancer outcomes.

Published
2022

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results