Search

Indigenous populations in Canada are disproportionately affected by early childhood caries. The Healthy Smile, Happy Child initiative utilizes a community development approach to encourage community uptake of evidence-based early childhood oral health promotion strategies. Sharing circles and focus groups elicited First Nations and Metis (Indigenous peoples of mixed Indigenous-European, primarily French, ancestry) views on the challenges of keeping children caries-free. We share participants’ experiences and viewpoints on implementation research strategies, principles and protocols that are sensitive to Indigenous community-based contexts.

Introduction Les caries de la petite enfance sont un problème de santé publique, et le fardeau considérable subi par les enfants autochtones met en lumière les inégalités en matière de santé buccodentaire au sein des populations au Canada. Les obstacles sont le manque d’accès aux soins de santé buccodentaire et l’absence d’une promotion de la santé buccodentaire culturellement adaptée. Cette étude visait à déterminer où et comment les parents, les familles et les membres des collectivités des Premières Nations et des Métis apprennent à prendre soin de la santé buccodentaire des jeunes enfants, et quelles idées et suggestions ils ont sur la façon de diffuser l’information et de promouvoir la santé buccodentaire des jeunes enfants au sein des collectivités autochtones. Méthodologie Les cercles de partage et les groupes de discussion ont mobilisé huit groupes de participants (n = 59) échantillonnés par choix dans quatre collectivités du Manitoba. Une approche relevant de la théorie ancrée a guidé l’analyse thématique des données enregistrées sur bande audio et transcrites. Résultats Les participants ont dit avoir tiré leurs connaissances sur la santé buccodentaire de parents, de la famille et d’amis, de fournisseurs de soins primaires, lors des programmes prénataux, dans les écoles et en ligne. Certains utilisaient des remèdes traditionnels. Les recommandations des participants ont été de transmettre de l’information qui soit culturellement adaptée par l’entremise de programmes et d’ateliers communautaires et prénataux, des écoles et des garderies, d’affiches, de dépliants envoyés par la poste et de communications téléphoniques (appels et textos) aux parents et aux familles, et au moyen des médias sociaux. Il a été recommandé, afin d’encourager une bonne hygiène buccale, de distribuer des produits d’hygiène buccale interactifs et attrayants pour les enfants. Conclusion De l’information et des ressources sur la santé buccodentaire fondées sur des données probantes et adaptées aux collectivités des Premières Nations et des Métis pourraient, si elles étaient fournies de façon stratégique, atteindre un plus grand nombre de familles et modifier la trajectoire actuelle de la santé buccodentaire des jeunes enfants.

Objectives: To assess the oral health status and oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL) of young First Nations and Metis children. Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed the oral health status of Indigenous children Results: Overall, 146 children were recruited with a mean age of 40.1 ± 21.2 (SD) months, and 49% were male. Among First Nations children, 65.4% had early childhood caries (ECC) as compared with 45.2% among Metis children (P = 0.025). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of severe ECC (S-ECC) between First Nations and Metis children (60.6% v. 42.9%, P = 0.051). The mean decayed, missing, and filled primary teeth (dmft) score was 4.9 ± 5.3 (range 0–20), and the mean decayed, missing, and filled surfaces (dmfs) score was 14.5 ± 20.4 (range 0–80). The total mean ECOHIS score was 4.4 ± 5.9 (range 0–25), while the mean Child Impact Section and Family Impact Section scores were 2.6 ± 4.0 (range 0–10) and 1.8 ± 2.8 (range 0–8), respectively. Multiple linear regression showed S-ECC was associated with total mean ECOHIS scores (P = 0.02). Higher total mean ECOHIS scores (which indicates poorer OHRQoL) were observed in children with ECC compared with caries-free children (5.8 v. 2.4, P = 0.0001). Conclusion: Oral health disparities such as ECC and reduced OHRQoL exist among many First Nations and Metis children in Manitoba. This is the first Canadian study exploring the OHRQoL of Indigenous children in addition to their oral health status. Knowledge Transfer Statement: This study is the first to report on the oral health–related quality of life and its relationship to early childhood caries (ECC) among young Canadian First Nations and Metis children. Metis children are just as likely to suffer from severe ECC than First Nations children. The findings of this study have informed community-based and community-developed oral health promotion and ECC prevention activities.

Objectives Early childhood caries (ECC) continues to be the leading reason for pediatric dental surgery in Canada and is particularly prevalent among Indigenous children. Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) offers an alternative method to manage non-restoratively caries. It is important to determine Indigenous communities' views on and receptivity toward SDF. Aim To understand Indigenous community members' views on pediatric dental surgery to treat ECC under general anesthesia (GA) and receptivity to SDF as an alternative to restorative surgery. Methods Focus groups and sharing circles congruent with an Indigenous ways of gathering information were conducted. Three interviewers engaged eight groups of First Nation and Metis communities in three rural Indigenous communities and ne metropolitan urban setting in Manitoba, Canada. Overall, 59 individuals participated. Open coding was guided by grounded theory and further analysis using Nvivo 12 software™. Results Participants mean age was 35.6 years, 88 percent (52 individuals) had a least one child, and 32 percent (19 individuals) were employed. Eight themes emerged, including respondents' fear of dental surgery under GA, fear of pain after dental surgery, parents' need for more information before accepting SDF treatment, and concern about the black staining of treated lesions. Conclusions Indigenous parents' acceptance of SDF as a treatment option is contingent on having more information and assurance that treatment under GA can be avoided. Understanding Indigenous parents' views may ensure better acceptance of SDF as a minimally invasive treatment option to manage ECC. A cautious and informative approach to SDF implementation in Indigenous communities is recommended.

Children of newcomers to Canada have been identified as at moderately high risk for developing early childhood caries (ECC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the oral health of preschool children of refugee and immigrant families in Winnipeg.Children72 months of age and their parent or primary caregiver were recruited through several newcomer settlement agencies, dental clinics and community programs. Parents and caregivers completed a short questionnaire with the assistance of a research team member. Children underwent a dental examination. Results of the questionnaire were combined with those of the clinical examination and subjected to statistical analysis.We recruited 211 children. Their mean age was 40.2 ± 15.4 months, and 54.0% were boys. Overall, 45.5% of the children had ECC and 31.8% had severe ECC (S-ECC). The mean decayed, missing and filled teeth (dmft) score was 2.2 ± 3.8 (range 0-19), while the mean decayed, missing, filled surfaces (dmfs) score was 4.8 ± 11.0 (range 0-63). Infant dental enucleation was observed in 6 children. Logistic regression analyses showed that increasing age, the presence of debris on teeth, parents believing their child has dental problems and the presence of enamel hypoplasia were significantly and independently associated with ECC and S-ECC (p ≤ 0.05).ECC is prevalent in children of newcomer families in Manitoba. These data will inform advocacy efforts to improve access to dental care and tailor early childhood oral health promotion and ECC prevention activities for refugees and recent immigrants.