Search

Background: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely used and have a potential for over-the-counter misuse. Limited health literacy is associated with poor health outcomes. Identification of new strategies to assess literacy and numeracy could be useful in targeting effective education initiatives. Objective: To characterize numeracy and literacy skills related to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug labels in primary care patients. Methods: Patients were recruited and consented over an 8-month period after their regular primary care visit. Demographic information was collected and two instruments were administered to assess literacy and numeracy skills: (1) a medication label literacy instrument focused on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (MedLit-NSAID) and (2) a general healthy literacy-screening tool, the Newest Vital Sign. Two questions on the MedLit-NSAID instrument evaluated understanding of the Food and Drug Administration medication guide for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the Food and Drug Administration approved over-the-counter label. Results: A total of 145 patients were enrolled. Mean MedLit-NSAID and Newest Vital Sign scores were 6.8 (scale range 0–8) and 4.2 (scale range 0–6), respectively. Higher education level was associated with higher scores for both tools (p ⩽ 0.05). Total MedLit-NSAID scores on average were higher in females compared with males (6.5 vs 6, p = 0.05). Patients with decreased kidney function (n = 18) had significantly lower MedLit-NSAID scores (p ⩽ 0.05). Test–retest scores were not significantly different for MedLit-NSAID (p = 0.32). The correlation between the tools was 0.54 and internal consistency MedLit-NSAID was 0.61. Conclusion: A medication information focused instrument provided specific information to assess health literacy related to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug labels. This information could be utilized to develop patient education initiatives for medication label comprehension.

The intent of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of commonly used intravenous (iv) vancomycin dosing schemes in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) using population pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling and Monte Carlo simulation.Data from a single-dose PK study of 10 non-infected APD patients ≥18 years old were analysed. Patients received iv vancomycin (15 mg/kg) followed by three cycler-assisted APD dwells over 8 h, followed by two 8 h dwells. Serum and dialysate samples were collected over the entire 24 h. A three-compartment model was fitted to the data with BigNPAG. Monte Carlo simulation was used to determine the probability of achieving an AUC/MIC ratio of400 in both the serum and the peritoneal cavity for a variety of iv vancomycin dosing schemes (1-2 g every 24-48 h).In the probability of target attainment (PTA) analyses, only 2 g of iv vancomycin every 24 h conferred90% probability of achieving an AUC/MIC ratio of400 for MIC values2 mg/L in the serum. However, this dosing regimen resulted in average trough concentrations20 mg/L. In the peritoneal cavity, no regimen yielded PTA ≥90% for MIC values ≥0.5 mg/L.Although expert guidelines suggest iv vancomycin may be an acceptable empirical therapy for patients on APD with infection, these analyses indicate that iv vancomycin may not be effective for peritonitis but may be a viable option for non-peritoneal infections with MIC values ≤1 mg/L.

While intraperitoneal (i.p.) ceftazidime is commonly used to treat continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)-related infections, the ability of i.p. regimens to achieve critical pharmacodynamic targets in both blood and dialysate has not been reported. To understand the pharmacodynamic profile of ceftazidime during CAPD, data were obtained from a single-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) i.p. ceftazidime study that included 10 CAPD patients who received i.p. ceftazidime at 15 mg/kg of body weight. The probability of target attainment (concentrations maintained above the MIC for >60% of the dosing interval [60% T > MIC]) was determined for six simulated regimens. A 3-compartment model with each dialysis dwell modeled as a separate differential equation was fit to ceftazidime concentrations using BigNPAG. Embedded with the final PK model, serum and dialysate concentration-time profiles of ceftazidime at 1, 1.5, and 2 g i.p. every 24 h (q24h) to q48h were simulated using ADAPT 5. The mean population pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: apparent volume of the central compartment ( V c ), 7.57 liter; apparent volume of the peritoneal cavity ( V pd), 2.44 liter; clearance from the central compartment (CL), 0.379 liter/h; intercompartmental transfer rate constants (first order) between the central and peripheral compartments ( k 12 and k 21 ), 4.66 and 4.88 h −1 , respectively; and intercompartmental transfer rate constants (first order) between the central and peritoneal compartments ( k 13 and k 31 ), 0.111 and 0.227 h −1 , respectively. In serum, the probability of target attainment for MICs of ≤8 mg/liter exceeded 90% for 1.5 to 2 g i.p. q24h to q48h. However, no tested regimen provided adequate dialysate exposure at MICs of ≥8 mg/liter on day 1 without the use of a 3-g loading dose ( post hoc analysis). On day 2, 1.5 to 2 g i.p. q24h or 2 g i.p. q48h provided adequate exposure in the peritoneal cavity. These results should be validated in the presence of infection. Ceftazidime i.p. at 1.5 or 2 g q24h to q48h is recommended for nonperitoneal infections. For peritonitis, a 3-g load with maintenance dosing of 1 to 2 g i.p. q24h or 2 g i.p. q48h is recommended.

While the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of daptomycin in hemodialysis (HD) patients have been evaluated previously by three groups, resultant dosing recommendations have varied. To address this clinical conundrum, this study combined concentration-time data from these PK evaluations and derived uniform dosing recommendations among patients on HD receiving daptomycin. A two-compartment model with separate HD and non-HD clearance terms was fit to the PK data from these studies by using BigNPAG. Embedded with PK parameters from the population PK analysis, 5,000-subject Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) were performed to identify HD dosing schemes that provided efficacy (cumulative and daily area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] values) and toxicity (trough concentrations of ≥24.3 mg/liter) profiles comparable to those from simulations employing the daptomycin PK model derived from the Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia–infective endocarditis (SAB-IE) study. Separate HD dosing schemes were sought for the two weekly interdialytic periods (48 and 72 h). For the 48-h interdialytic period, intra- and post-HD dosing provided the most isometric cumulative and daily AUCs. For the 72-h interdialytic period, all HD dosing schemes provided noncumulative AUC values from 48 to 72 h (AUC 48–72 ) that were 48–72 values. Increasing the parent dose by 50% intra- or post-HD provided comparable AUC 48–72 values, while maintaining acceptable trough concentration ( C min ) values. When efficacy and toxicity profiles were evaluated for each individual study, higher probabilities for C min reaching ≥24.3 mg/liter were observed in one of the three studies. Given the high probability of C min being ≥24.3 mg/liter in one of the three studies, more intensive creatine phosphokinase (CPK) monitoring may be warranted in HD patients receiving daptomycin.

Scant data exist for the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ertapenem in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). The goals of this study were to characterize the PK profile of ertapenem during CAPD, determine the extent of ertapenem penetration into the peritoneal cavity, and quantify the probability of the target attainment (PTA) profile in the serum and peritoneal cavity. A single-dose PK study was conducted in seven patients on CAPD. Population PK modeling and Monte Carlo simulation determined the probability that ertapenem at 500 mg intravenously (i.v.) every 24 h (q24h) would achieve concentrations in excess of the MIC for 40% of the dosing interval (40% T >MIC, where T is time) in the serum and peritoneal cavity. Monte Carlo simulation was also used to calculate the peritoneal cavity/serum mean and median penetration ratios by estimating the area under the concentration-time curve in the peritoneal cavity and serum (AUC Peritoneal and AUC Serum , respectively) from zero to infinity after a single simulated dose. The population mean (± standard deviation [SD]) values for the apparent volume in the central compartment, clearance, and apparent volume in the peritoneal cavity were 2.78 (0.62) liters, 0.24 (0.07) liters/hr, and 5.81 (2.05) liters, respectively. The mean (SD) AUC Peritoneal /AUC Serum ratio was 1.039 (0.861), and the median penetration ratio was 0.801 (interquartile range, 0.486 to 1.317). In both the serum and peritoneal cavity, ertapenem at 500 mg i.v. q24h was very likely (>90%) to achieve the pharmacodynamic target for MICs of ≤2 mg/liter. The simulations suggest that 500 mg of ertapenem i.v. q24h is very likely to achieve the exposure target associated with clinical efficacy in both the serum and peritoneal cavity against the range of MIC values deemed susceptible by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.

Drug dosage adjustment for patients with acute or chronic kidney disease is an accepted standard of practice. The challenge is how to accurately estimate a patient’s kidney function in both acute and chronic kidney disease and determine the influence of renal replacement therapies on drug disposition. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) held a conference to investigate these issues and propose recommendations for practitioners, researchers, and those involved in the drug development and regulatory arenas. The conference attendees discussed the major challenges facing drug dosage adjustment for patients with kidney disease. In particular, although glomerular filtration rate is the metric used to guide dose adjustment, kidney disease does affect nonrenal clearances, and this is not adequately considered in most pharmacokinetic studies. There are also inadequate studies in patients receiving all forms of renal replacement therapy and in the pediatric population. The conference generated 37 recommendations for clinical practice, 32 recommendations for future research directions, and 24 recommendations for regulatory agencies (US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency) to enhance the quality of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information available to clinicians. The KDIGO Conference highlighted the gaps and focused on crafting paths to the future that will stimulate research and improve the global outcomes of patients with acute and chronic kidney disease.

Medication regimen simplification may improve adherence in end-stage kidney disease. The effect of nocturnal home hemodialysis (NHHD) on medication burden is unknown. A retrospective pilot study of NHHD patients was conducted. Medication information was collected at baseline, NHHD start, and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. SF-36 scores were collected at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months. The number of medications, pill burden, and number of administrations per day were determined. Medication Regimen Complexity Index was used at each time point as a comparator. Medications for anemia, mineral and bone disorders (MBD), cardiovascular (CV) disease, infection, and vitamins were analyzed for number of medications and pill burden. Thirty-five patients were included. Patients used 10.5 ± 4.4 medications at baseline and 11.8 ± 4.7 at the end of the study (P=NS). Regarding the number of medications, anemia medications, anti-infectives, and vitamins increased; MBD and CV medications decreased by the end of the study. Total pill burden did not change over 24 months, nor did anemia pill burden. Mineral bone disorder and CV pill burden decreased, and vitamins and anti-infective pill burden increased. Daily medication administration times decreased significantly from 5.0 ± 1.5 to 3.6 ± 1.5 by 24 months. Switching to NHHD was associated with a significant increase in Medication Regimen Complexity Index at 24 months (P

Older adults represent one of the fasting growing age groups in many countries including the United States [1]. This rate of growth is mirrored in the dialysis population. The number of incident dialysis patients over the age of 65 years is greater than 50 %. The number of incident dialysis patients greater than 75 years of age represents the fasting growing population of dialysis patients.

An increasing number of patients are developing chronic kidney disease (CKD). Appropriate care for patients with CKD must occur in the earliest stages, preferably before CKD progresses to more severe stages. Therefore, recognition and treatment of CKD and its associated complications must occur in primary care settings. Patients with CKD often have comorbid conditions such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, creating specific considerations when treating these diseases. Also, these patients have CKD-related conditions, including anemia and renal osteodystrophy, that are not traditionally evaluated and monitored by the primary care practitioner. Collectively, many opportunities exist for pharmacists who practice in the primary care setting to improve the care of patients with CKD.

Kidney disease is a rare complication of Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. We report a case of nephrotic syndrome and minimal change disease in a patient with biopsy proven Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. The patient presented with over 12 grams of proteinuria and was successfully treated with oral prednisone over the course of 4 weeks. Repeat serum protein electrophoresis as well as serum immunoelectrophoresis revealed no paraproteins, urine analysis was negative for protein or blood by dipstick and spot urine protein was 9 mg/dL with creatinine of 101 mg/dL at time of last office visit. This case illustrates the successful treatment with corticosteroids alone with prolonged complete remission.

Introduction Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently associated with community-acquired acute kidney injury (AKI), a strong risk factor for development and progression of chronic kidney disease. Using access to prescription medication profiles, pharmacists can identify patients at high risk for NSAID-induced AKI. The primary objective of this analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of a community pharmacy–based patient education program on patient knowledge of NSAID-associated renal safety concerns. Methods Patients receiving prescription medications for hypertension or diabetes mellitus were invited to participate in an educational program on the risks of NSAID use. A patient knowledge questionnaire (PKQ) consisting of 5 questions scored from 1 to 5 was completed before and after the intervention. Information was collected on age, race, sex, and frequency of NSAID use. Results A total of 152 participants (60% women) completed both the pre- and post-intervention questionnaire; average age was 54.6 (standard deviation [SD], 17.5). Mean pre-intervention PKQ score was 3.3 (SD, 1.4), and post-intervention score was 4.6 (SD, 0.9) (P = .002). Participants rated program usefulness (1 = not useful to 5 = extremely useful) as 4.2 (SD, 1.0). In addition, 48% reported current NSAID use and 67% reported that the program encouraged them to limit their use. Conclusion NSAID use was common among patients at high risk for AKI. A brief educational intervention in a community pharmacy improved patient knowledge on NSAID-associated risks. Pharmacists practicing in the community can partner with primary care providers in the medical home model to educate patients at risk for AKI.

Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing an in-vitro, closed loop hemodialysis system as a method to assess drug clearance. Secondarily, this study tested the influence of variables (blood flow rate, dialysate flow rate, and type of filter) in the hemodialysis procedure on the clearance of vancomycin and gentamicin. Methods An in-vitro, closed loop hemodialysis system was constructed. The vancomycin (30 mg/L) and gentamicin (25 mg/L) were added to a simulated blood system (SBS). Four conditions (C1-C4) were tested by defining the filter (Polyflux 170H or F180) and the blood and dialysate flow rates (BFR and DFR). All hemodialysis sessions were 3 hours in length and each condition was completed in duplicate. Dialysate effluent was collected in a 50 gallon polyethylene drum. Samples were collected (in duplicate) from the SBS and the dialysate effluent at baseline and at the end of the hemodialysis session. Samples were analyzed for vancomycin and gentamicin with an ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method. Results A total of eight 3-hour hemodialysis sessions were conducted. For all tested conditions (C1-C4), vancomycin was undetectable in the SBS at the end of dialysis. However, total vancomycin recovery in the dialysis effluent was 85±18%, suggesting that up to 15% may have adsorbed to the dialysis filter or tubing. Gentamicin clearance from SBS was >98% in all tested conditions. Average gentamicin recovery in the dialysate effluent was 99±15%. Conclusion Both vancomycin and gentamicin were readily removed by high-flux hemodialysis under all conditions studied. No significant differences in drug clearance were observed between conditions used in this in vitro study. The clinical implications of changing these hemodialysis parameters are unknown.

Cefazolin dialytic clearance has not been determined in patients undergoing hemodialysis with high-efficiency or high-flux dialyzers. The objective of this study is to determine the pharmacokinetics and dialytic clearance of cefazolin and develop dosing strategies in these patients. Twenty-five uninfected subjects undergoing chronic thrice-weekly hemodialysis were administered a single dose of intravenous cefazolin (15 mg/kg) after their standard hemodialysis session. Fifteen subjects underwent hemodialysis with high-efficiency hemodialyzers, and 10 subjects underwent hemodialysis with high-flux hemodialyzers. Blood and urine samples were collected serially over the interdialytic period, during the next intradialytic period, and immediately after the next hemodialysis session. Serum and urine concentrations of cefazolin were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Differential equations describing a two-compartment model were fit to the cefazolin serum concentration-time data over the study period, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. Mean dialytic clearance values for cefazolin were significantly greater in the high-flux group compared with the high-efficiency group (30.9 +/- 6.52 versus 18.0 +/- 6.26 mL/min, respectively; P: < 0.05). Cefazolin reduction ratios were significantly greater (0.62 +/- 0.08 versus 0.50 +/- 0.07; P: < 0.005) in the high-flux group compared with the high-efficiency group and correlated well with equilibrated urea reduction. The pharmacokinetic model developed from patient data was used to simulate cefazolin serum concentration data for high-efficiency and high-flux dialyzers. Cefazolin doses of 15 or 20 mg/kg after each hemodialysis session maintained adequate serum concentrations throughout a 2- or 3-day interdialytic period regardless of hemodialyzer type.

Ceftazidime is currently recommended as an alternative first-line agent in the treatment of peritonitis and for Pseudomonas peritonitis. The pharmacokinetics of intermittent intraperitoneal (i.p.) ceftazidime have been poorly characterized. This study was designed to characterize the pharmacokinetic disposition of a single dose of ceftazidime in anuric and non-anuric CAPD patients, over 48 hours. This was a prospective, open label, pharmacokinetic study. The study was conducted in an independent, outpatient dialysis center. Ten volunteer continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients with and without residual renal function, no peritonitis or antibiotics in the previous 4 weeks, and on CAPD for at least 2 months were recruited. Patients received a single dose of i.p. ceftazidime (15 mg/kg) in the first daytime exchange over a 6-hour dwell, after an overnight dwell. Serum, urine, and dialysate were collected over a 48-hour period. A high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay was used to analyze ceftazidime in these samples. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Six of the 10 patients were non-anuric with a mean residual renal creatinine clearance of 2.9 +/- 1.6 mL/min. The mean +/- SD bioavailability was 72% +/- 14%, and the volume of distribution was 0.34 +/- 0.08 L/kg. The mean serum elimination half-life of 22 +/- 5 hours. The peritoneal clearance was 5.74 +/- 1.6 mL/min. No difference was detected between anuric and nonanuric patients. Mean plasma and dialysate concentrations at 24 hours were 24 +/- 6 microg/mL and 18 +/- 7 microg/mL, respectively, and were 12.0 +/- 3.6 microg/mL and 7.4 +/- 3.1 microg/mL at 48 hours, respectively. Once-daily i.p. dosing of ceftazidime achieves serum and dialysate levels greater than the MIC of sensitive organisms over 48 hours.

It has been traditional to measure drug concentrations using high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). While this method is highly accurate, it is time consuming and requires the use of appropriate standards for identification of the compound. In addition, identification and quantification of drugs from patient samples requires significant manipulation to remove protein. In contrast, enzyme-linked immunoassays (EIA) are able to assay samples with a high degree of specificity, and are able to process multiple samples at a time. In addition, serum proteins do not interfere with sample quantification and samples may be tested without significant preparation. We describe the development of an EIA for the detection of ciprofloxacin in serum and dialysate samples. The immunoassay is specific for ciprofloxacin and is sensitive for picogram amounts of the antibiotic.

Medication regimen simplification may improve adherence in end-stage kidney disease. The effect of nocturnal home hemodialysis (NHHD) on medication burden is unknown. A retrospective pilot study of NHHD patients was conducted. Medication information was collected at baseline, NHHD start, and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. SF-36 scores were collected at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months. The number of medications, pill burden, and number of administrations per day were determined. Medication Regimen Complexity Index was used at each time point as a comparator. Medications for anemia, mineral and bone disorders (MBD), cardiovascular (CV) disease, infection, and vitamins were analyzed for number of medications and pill burden. Thirty-five patients were included. Patients used 10.5 ± 4.4 medications at baseline and 11.8 ± 4.7 at the end of the study (P=NS). Regarding the number of medications, anemia medications, anti-infectives, and vitamins increased; MBD and CV medications decreased by the end of the study. Total pill burden did not change over 24 months, nor did anemia pill burden. Mineral bone disorder and CV pill burden decreased, and vitamins and anti-infective pill burden increased. Daily medication administration times decreased significantly from 5.0 ± 1.5 to 3.6 ± 1.5 by 24 months. Switching to NHHD was associated with a significant increase in Medication Regimen Complexity Index at 24 months (P0.05). SF-36 scores increased significantly once patients began on NHHD. No measure of medication regimen complexity was correlated with the SF-36 score. Medication burden changes over time after starting NHHD. It is unknown what effect NHHD has on adherence or medication costs, and warrants further study in a prospective comparative investigation.

For decades, salicylates have been recognised as one of the leading causes of drug overdoses. Deaths attributable to salicylates alone can be as high as 20.6% per year of analgesic drug deaths.[1] The incidence of salicylate poisonings, especially those with a chronic component, is difficult to ascertain because of the under-reporting of such cases and the poor correlation with serum levels. However, it is perceived to be low and usually occurs in patients with chronic pain.[2] Classic signs and symptoms in mild cases of acute salicylate toxicity include tachypnoea, lethargy, vomiting and hyperthermia without overt acidosis. In severe cases, symptoms worsen and, in addition, the patient may have metabolic acidosis and/or coma.[3] These symptoms correlate with the Done nomogram, which is used to assess the severity of acute salicylate poisoning.[4] Unfortunately, the severity of chronic salicylate overdoses is difficult to determine since serum concentrations do not accurately correlate with the Done nomogram.[5] Data illustrating the clinical ramifications of mixed acute and chronic intoxication of salicylates are scarce. Pulmonary injury has been well documented with chronic salicylate toxicity. Animal lung biopsy studies of salicylate poisoning have demonstrated increased permeability of alveoli.[6] To the best of our knowledge, these findings have not been confirmed in humans other than at autopsy.[7] This case illustrates the magnitude of diffuse pulmonary damage resulting in respiratory failure from long-term salicylate use as well as histological evidence in an otherwise healthy individual.

Purpose. The National Kidney Foundation (NKF) clinical practice recommendations for treating anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the dosing, route and frequency of administration, efficacy, and safety of currently available and investigational drug therapies for anemia in patients with CKD, including the erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) iron replacement, and adjuvants, are described. Summary. The NKF recommendations for ESA use are general and include dosing based on the measured and target hemoglobin concentrations, the rate of increase in hemoglobin, and clinical circumstances, with the route and frequency of administration determined by the CKD stage, treatment setting, efficacy, and ESA class. A serum ferritin concentration of 100–500 ng/mL is the target during oral and intravenous (i.v.) iron therapy for predialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients, but use of the i.v. route of administration and a target serum ferritin concentration of 200–500 ng/mL is recommended for hemodialysis patients by NKF. Iron deficiency and inflammation are possible causes of inadequate response to ESAs. The safety profile of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa are similar, but the longer half-life of darbepoetin alfa permits administration on a once-monthly basis in patients with CKD and anemia. Extended dosing of CERA also appears safe and effective in dialysis patients with CKD. Several investigational anemia therapies with a variety of mechanisms of action are in development. Conclusion. Efforts by the NKF to update their clinical practice recommendations provide clinicians with insight into the optimal therapeutic approach to treating anemia in patients with CKD. Clinical research has resulted in the development of new therapeutic modalities to improve outcomes in patients with CKD and anemia.

Background: Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) devices provide portable, easy-to-operate, low-cost options for point-of-care screening of bone mineral density (BMD). Community pharmacists should be aware of the precision, sensitivity, and specificity of these devices prior to their purchase. Objective: To determine the precision, sensitivity, and specificity of the Achilles Express ultrasonometer compared with central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (cDXA) as well as its utility as a bone density screening device in the community pharmacy setting. Methods: A prospective study in a community pharmacy and outpatient ambulatory clinic was conducted with 2 groups of white women. Group 1 participants were 25–35 years of age (young, healthy), and those in Group 2 were 45 years of age or older (postmenopausal). BMD assessments of the spine and the nondominant wrist and hip were performed using cDXA. Assessments of the heel were performed using the Achilles Express, a QUS device. The main outcome measures were correlation of t-scores between cDXA and QUS measurements using the Pearson correlation test. Results: Twenty-two (30 ± 4 years of age) and 31 (55 ± 17 years of age) women were enrolled into Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Significant correlations between QUS and hip and spine cDXA t-scores were found in both groups. Correlation coefficients for QUS versus hip cDXA were 0.51 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.77) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.85) in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Correlation coefficients for the QUS versus spine cDXA were 0.64 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.84) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.79) in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The QUS device has a sensitivity level of 88% and specificity of 71% to detect a hip cDXA t-score of less than –1. Conclusions: The Achilles Express ultrasonometer is a reasonable screening tool to detect low BMD in postmenopausal women.

Ceftizoxime is a third-generation, semisynthetic cephalosporin that has activity against many grampositive and gram-negative micro-organisms. In the treatment of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) peritonitis, ceftizoxime is usually reserved for organisms which show in vitro susceptibility once the organism has been cultured (1). The pharmacokinetics of ceftizoxime have been previously studied in CAPD patients without peritonitis (2). However, there are no pharmacokinetic data or efficacy studies of ceftizoxime in patients with peritonitis. We report dialysate and serum levels following the use of intraperitoneal (IP) ceftizoxime for the treatment of peritonitis caused by Serratia marcescens.

Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) might be at high risk for bone disease. Decreased functional kidney mass contributes to renal osteodystrophy, which might be exacerbated by certain drug therapies. Long-term (≥6 months) corticosteroid treatment is commonly prescribed in patients with glomerular disease, possibly causing bone loss both indirectly and directly, putting the patient at increased risk for fracture. The dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the current "gold standard" for measuring osteoporosis-related fractures and works by passing ultrasound waves through bone to determine the structural anisotropy in the heel. Objective: This pilot study was designed to determine whether there is a correlation between DXA and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in detecting corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Methods: This open-label pilot study was conducted at the Medical Center Nephrology Clinic, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York. Female patients aged≥18 years with a diagnosis of CKD and/or a history of kidney transplantation and who were receiving long-term corticosteroid treatment were enrolled. Each patient served as her own control and underwent DXA of the hip and spine (DXA-hip and DXA-spine, respectively) and QUS of the dominant and nondominant heels (QUS-dominant and QUS-nondominant, respectively), within 1 week so that conditions were similar in each patient. Results: Eight patients were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 50.2 [11.2] years). A positive correlation was found between DXA-hip and QUS-nondominant ( r 2 =0.76; P=0.009); however, no correlation was found with DXA-spine. Similarly, a positive correlation was found between DXA-hip and QUS-dominant ( r 2 =0.75; P=0.009), but no correlation with DXA-spine was found ( r 2 =0.22). Conclusion: In this small, selected population, QUS showed a fair correlation with DXA-hip but no correlation with DXA-spine. Further studies are needed to determine the effectiveness in other populations.

BACKGROUND: The use of natural products is increasing, but healthcare professionals may underestimate the use of these agents by patients. It is unknown whether natural product use differs between primary care and specialty clinic patients, such as those in a nephrology clinic. OBJECTIVE: To compare patterns of natural product use between primary care and nephrology clinic patients. METHODS: One thousand adult patients from each clinic were randomly mailed an anonymous questionnaire to determine current and past use of natural products. RESULTS: A total of 491 surveys were returned, for an overall response rate of 26% (25% primary care; 28% nephrology clinic). Current use of natural products was similar between the primary care and nephrology groups (34% vs 29%, respectively; p = NS). Primary care patients were more likely to have taken a natural product in the past (57% vs 45%; p < 0.05); Echinacea was the most common product taken by those patients (26%). Green tea was the most common natural product taken by nephrology clinic patients (18%). More primary care patients took Echinacea compared with nephrology clinic patients (26% vs 12%; p < 0.01). Adverse reactions led to discontinuation of the natural product in 7% of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Active use of natural products was similar between the survey respondents. Documentation and monitoring of natural product use by healthcare professionals working with primary care and nephrology clinic patients are recommended.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a case of toxicity secondary to chronic ingestion of 6–12 times the recommended daily allowance of over-the-counter (OTC) chromium picolinate. CASE SUMMARY: A 33-year-old white woman presented with weight loss, anemia, thrombocytopenia, hemolysis, liver dysfunction (aminotransferase enzymes 15–20 times normal, total bilirubin 3 times normal), and renal failure (serum creatinine 5.3 mg/dL; blood urea nitrogen 152 mg/dL). She had ingested chromium picolinate 1200–2400 μg/d for the previous 4–5 months to enhance weight loss. The patient had chromium plasma concentrations 2–3 times normal. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome were ruled out by clinical findings, peripheral blood smears, and a bone marrow biopsy. The patient was managed with supportive measures and received blood product transfusions and hemodialysis. Hemolysis stabilized and liver function improved over 6 days. Liver function returned to normal prior to discharge. Renal function began to return on day 12 and her serum creatinine on discharge was 1.3 mg/dL. One year later, all laboratory values were within normal limits. DISCUSSION: Trivalent chromium is an essential trace element that is considered safe when ingested in normal quantities. Trivalent chromium compounds are used by patients to enhance weight loss, increase lean body mass, and/or improve glycemic control. Information regarding the toxicity of chromium picolinate is limited. CONCLUSIONS: Chromium supplements may cause serious renal impairment when ingested in excess. Medication histories should include attention to the use of OTC nutritional supplements often regarded as harmless by the public and lay media. OBJETIVO: Describir un caso de toxicidad producida por la ingestión crónica de picolinato de cromio, producto que no requiere prescripción médica, en cantidades de 6–12 veces mayores que las recomendadas. RESUMEN DEL CASO: Una mujer de 33 años presentaba pérdida de peso, anemia, trombocitopenia, hemólisis, disfunción hepática (aminotranferasas 15–20 veces el valor normal, bilirubina total tres veces el valor normal), y fallo renal (creatinina sérica = 5.3 mg/dL, nitrógeno ureíco sanguíneo = 152 mg/dL). Esta paciente había ingerido 1200–2400 μg diarios de picolinato de cromio durante los pasados 4–5 meses para bajar de peso. La paciente tenía una concentración de cromio en el plasma 2–3 veces lo normal. Se descartaron los síndromes de trombocitopenia púrpura trombótica y uremia hemolítica mediante hallazgos clínicos, cultivo de sangre, y biopsia de médula ósea. La paciente se manejó con medidas de apoyo, transfusiones con productos de sangre y hemodiálisis. La hemólisis se estabilizó y la función hepática mejoró a los 6 días de tratamiento. La función hepática regresó a los limites normales antes de ser dada de alta. La función renal comenzó a normalizarse el día 12 de la hospitalización y la creatinina sérica disminuyó a 1.3 mg/dL el día que la paciente fue dada de alta. Un año más tarde, todos los valores de laboratorio se encontraban dentro de los límites normales. DISCUSION: El cromio trivalente es un elemento traza esencial que se considera seguro cuando se ingiere en cantidades recomendadas. En la actualidad, los compuestos de cromio trivalente son utilizados para ayudar en la pérdida de peso, aumentar el peso magro y/o mejorar el control glucémico. La información disponible relacionada con la toxicidad del picolinato de cromio es aún muy limitada. CONCLUSIONES: Los suplementos de cromio pueden causar impedimentos renales serios cuando se ingieren en cantidades excesivas. Es importante que el historial médico incluya información sobre los suplementos nutricionales que pueda estar utilizando el paciente. Estos productos se adquieren sin prescripción médica y muchas veces el público y los medios de información no especializados los consideran inofensivos. OBJECTIF: Décrire un cas de toxicité associee à l'ingestion chronique d'un produit de comptoir, le picolinate de chromium, à une dose de 6–12 fois celle recommandée quotidiennement. RÉSUMÉ DU CAS: Une femme âgée de 33 ans se présente à l'urgence où on constate une perte de poids, une anémie, une thrombocytopénie, une hémolyse, un problème hépatique (le taux des aminotransférases est de 15–20 fois la normale, le taux de la bilirubine totale est de 3 fois la normale), et une insuffisance rénale (créatinine sérique = 5.3 mg/dL, azote uréique sanguine = 152 mg/dL). Elle a ingéré 1200–2400 μg par jour de picolinate de chromium pendant les 4–5 mois précédents pour stimuler une perte de poids. Les concentrations plasmatiques de chromium sont de 2–3 fois la normale. Un purpura thrombotique thrombocytopénique et un syndrome hémolytique urémique ont été éliminés à l'aide des données cliniques, des prélèvements sanguins et d'une biopsie de la moëlle épinière. Un traitement de support a été administré à la patiente; elle a reçu des transfusions sanguines et une hémodialyse a été réalisée. L'hémolyse s'est stabilisé et la fonction hépatique s'est améliorée en 6 jours. La fonction hépatique s'est normalisée avant le départ de la patiente. La fonction rénale a commencé à s'améliorer au jour 12 et la créatinine sérique était de 1.3 mg/dL à son départ. Un an plus tard, toutes les valeurs de laboratoire sont à l'intérieur de la limite de la normale. DISCUSSION: Le chromium trivalent est un oligo-élément essentiel considéré sécuritaire lorsqu'il est ingéré en quantité normale. Des produits à base de chromium trivalent sont utilisés couramment par les patients pour favoriser la perte de poids, pour augmenter la masse maigre et/ou pour améliorer le contrôle glycémique. Les données concernant la toxicité du picolinate de chromium sont limitées. CONCLUSIONS: Les suppléments de chromium peuvent causer une altération grave de la fonction rénale s'ils sont ingérés en quantité excessive. Lors des entrevues avec les patients, une attention particulière devrait être portee à l'utilisation des suppléments nutritionnels disponibles sans ordonnance et considérés sans danger par le public et la presse.

Introduction: Methanol poisoning can lead to complications that include metabolic acidosis, visual impairment and death. Treatment options include ethanol, fomepizole, and hemodialysis (HD). Objective: To report on the occurrence of post dialysis methanol rebound during treatment. Method and Findings: A 40-year-old male with a history of schizophrenia and suicide attempts presented to the emergency room after reportedly ingesting 1 quart of windshield washer fluid. The patient presented with a preliminary blood chemistry of methanol 390 mg/dL, ethanol 48 mg/dL, glucose 93 mg/dL, Na 138 meq/L, K 3.8 meq/L, Cl 98 mmol/L, CO2 26 mmol/L, urea 16 mg/dL, creatinine 1.2 mg/dL, and an anion gap of 14 mmol/L. The patient was started on 1360 mg of fomepizole (12:50 AM) followed by HD for 4 hours. A second dose of fomepizole (900 mg) was administered at 8:00 AM. In addition, another HD session was started at 12:00 PM and continued for 4 hours. A third dose of fomepizole (700 mg) was administered at 8:50 PM. Finally, a third HD session was started the next day at 3:05 PM and lasted 3 hours. Table 1 illustrates methanol levels in relation to each HD session. Findings: Methanol concentration after the first HD increased from 100 mg/dL to 127 mg/dL (27%) in 5 h 20 m. It also increased from 35 mg/dL to 50 mg/dL (43%) 14 h 45 m after the second HD. Conclusions: Close attention must be paid to the potential for post dialysis methanol rebound. It is recommended that methanol levels continue to be monitored for several hours after HD. Table 1. Methanol levels before and after each hemodialysis Start HD #1 (2:40 AM) End HD #1 (6:40 AM) Start HD#2 (12:00 PM) End HD#2 (4:00 PM) Next Day (6:45 AM) Methanol (mg/dL) 324 100 127 35 50 Rebound 27% 43%

Background Intravenous iron is typically administered during the hemodialysis (HD) procedure. HD patients may be prescribed high-flux (HF) or high-efficiency (HE) dialysis membranes. The extent of iron sucrose and iron dextran removal by HD using HF or HE membranes and by ultrafiltration rate (UFR) is unknown. Methods Two in vitro HD systems were designed and constructed to determine the dialyzabiltiy of iron from a simulated blood system (SBS) containing 100 mg iron sucrose or iron dextran (system A) or 1000 mg iron sucrose (system B). Both in vitro systems utilized a 6-L closed-loop SBS system that was subject to 4 different HD conditions conducted over 4 hours: HE membrane + 0 ml/hr UFR; HE membrane + 500 ml/hr UFR; HF membrane + 0 ml/hr UFR; HF membrane + 500 ml/hr UFR. Blood flow and dialysate flow rates were 500 ml/min and 800 ml/min, respectively. The dialysate compartment was a 192-L open system for system A and a 6-L closed-loop system for system B. Samples from the SBS and dialysate compartments were taken at various time points and iron elimination rate and HD clearance was determined. Iron removal from the SBS > 15% was considered clinically significant. Results The greatest percentage removal from the SBS was 13.5% and -0.03% utilizing system A and B, respectively. Iron sucrose and iron dextran dialysate concentration was below the lower limits of assay (< 2 ppm) for system A. Dialysate recovery of iron was negligible: 0 – 5.4 mg system A and 5.47 – 23.59 mg for system B. Dialyzer type or UFR did not affect iron removal. Conclusion HF or HE dialysis membranes do not remove clinically significant amounts of iron sucrose or dextran formulations over a 4-hour HD session. This effect remained constant even controlling for UFR up to 500 ml/hour. Therefore, iron sucrose and iron dextran are not dialyzed by HE or HF dialysis membranes irrespective of UFR.