Search

Additional long-term treatments are needed for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). An ongoing, open-label, 5-year extension trial, ECZTEND (NCT03587805), assesses tralokinumab plus optional topical corticosteroids in participants from previous tralokinumab parent trials (PTs) with moderate-to-severe AD.To evaluate the safety and efficacy of up to 2 years tralokinumab treatment in a post hoc interim analysis.Safety analyses included adults from completed PTs enrolled in ECZTEND, regardless of tralokinumab exposure duration. Efficacy analyses included adult participants treated with tralokinumab in ECZTEND for ≥1 year and subgroup analyses of those on tralokinumab for 2 years (1 year from PT, 1 year in ECZTEND). Primary end point was the number of adverse events with additional efficacy end points.Participants on tralokinumab had an exposure-adjusted rate of 237.8 adverse events/100 patient-years' exposure (N = 1174) in the safety analysis set. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of common adverse events were comparable to PTs, although at lower rates. With 2 years of tralokinumab, improvements in extent and severity of AD were sustained, with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) in 82.5% of participants (N = 345).Possible selection bias; no placebo arm; some participants experienced treatment gaps between PTs and ECZTEND.Over 2 years, tralokinumab was well tolerated and maintained long-term control of AD signs and symptoms.

Background Tralokinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that specifically neutralizes interleukin-13, a key driver of atopic dermatitis (AD).Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were candidates for systemic therapy.Methods This was a double-blind, placebo plus TCS controlled phase III trial. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to subcutaneous tralokinumab 300 mg or placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W) with TCS as needed over 16 weeks. Patients who achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0/1 and/or 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) at week 16 with tralokinumab were rerandomized 1 : 1 to tralokinumab Q2W or every 4 weeks (Q4W), with TCS as needed, for another 16 weeks.Results At week 16, more patients treated with tralokinumab than with placebo achieved IGA 0/1: 38 center dot 9% vs. 26 center dot 2% [difference (95% confidence interval): 12 center dot 4% (2 center dot 9-21 center dot 9); P = 0 center dot 015] and EASI 75: 56 center dot 0% vs. 35 center dot 7% [20 center dot 2% (9 center dot 8-30 center dot 6); P < 0 center dot 001]. Of the patients who were tralokinumab responders at week 16, 89 center dot 6% and 92 center dot 5% of those treated with tralokinumab Q2W and 77 center dot 6% and 90 center dot 8% treated with tralokinumab Q4W maintained an IGA 0/1 and EASI 75 response at week 32, respectively. Among patients who did not achieve IGA 0/1 and EASI 75 with tralokinumab Q2W at 16 weeks, 30 center dot 5% and 55 center dot 8% achieved these endpoints, respectively, at week 32. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar across treatment groups.Conclusions Tralokinumab 300 mg in combination with TCS as needed was effective and well tolerated in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

Ruxolitinib cream demonstrated safety and efficacy over 8 weeks in two double-blind phase 3 atopic dermatitis studies (NCT03745638/NCT03745651).Evaluate long-term safety (LTS) and disease control with ruxolitinib cream.Patients initially randomized to twice-daily 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream maintained their regimen during the 44-week LTS period (as-needed treatment). Patients on vehicle were rerandomized (1:1) at Week 8 to either ruxolitinib cream strength. Safety and disease control (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] score 0/1 and affected body surface area [BSA]) were assessed.Over 52 weeks, adverse events (AEs) were reported in 67.4%/62.6%/53.5%/57.6% of patients in 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream/vehicle to 0.75% ruxolitinib cream/vehicle to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream groups (n=426/446/101/99). Most common AEs were upper respiratory tract infection (10.3%/11.4%/5.9%/7.1%) and nasopharyngitis (8.9%/9.9%/7.9%/14.1%). Most AEs were considered unrelated to treatment. Application site reactions were infrequent (3.8%/1.8%/1.0%/1.0%). Disease control was achieved throughout the LTS; 74.1%-77.8% of patients had IGA 0/1 at Week 52, and mean affected BSA was low (1.4%-1.8%).LTS had no control treatment.During 44 weeks of as-needed treatment, ruxolitinib cream demonstrated effective disease control and tolerability; low ruxolitinib plasma concentrations alongside safety findings reflecting known risk factors suggest physiologically meaningful systemic Janus kinase inhibition is highly unlikely.

Ruxolitinib (RUX) cream demonstrated potent anti-inflammatory and antipruritic efficacy in a phase 2 study in adults with atopic dermatitis (AD).To evaluate 8-week efficacy and safety in 2 phase 3 studies of RUX cream in patients with AD.Topical Ruxolitinib Evaluation in Atopic Dermatitis Study 1 (NCT03745638) and Study 2 (NCT03745651) enrolled patients aged ≥12 years with AD for ≥2 years, an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 2/3, and 3%-20% affected body surface area. Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to twice-daily 0.75% RUX cream, 1.5% RUX cream, or vehicle cream for 8 continuous weeks. The primary endpoint was Investigator's Global Assessment treatment success at week 8 (Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0/1 and ≥2-grade improvement from baseline).In the Topical Ruxolitinib Evaluation in Atopic Dermatitis Study 1 and 2, 631 and 618 patients were randomized (631/577 analyzed for efficacy). Significantly more patients achieved Investigator's Global Assessment treatment success with 0.75% RUX cream (50.0%/39.0%) and 1.5% RUX cream (53.8%/51.3%) versus vehicle (15.1%/7.6%; P .0001) at week 8. Significant itch reductions versus vehicle were reported within 12 hours of first application of 1.5% RUX (P .05). Application site reactions were infrequent (1%) and lower with RUX versus vehicle; none were clinically significant.Longer-term safety data are not yet available.RUX cream showed anti-inflammatory and prompt antipruritic effects with superior efficacy versus vehicle and was well tolerated.

N/A

Introduction Des options therapeutiques a long terme sont necessaires pour les patients atteints de dermatite atopique (DA) moderee a severe. Le tralokinumab est un anticorps monoclonal entierement humain qui cible specifiquement l’interleukine-13, un facteur cle des symptomes de la DA [1,2]. Des donnees d’efficacite et de tolerance du tralokinumab pendant une periode allant jusqu’a 52 semaines chez des patients adultes atteints de DA ont deja ete publiees [3,4]. Materiel et methodes Une etude d’extension en ouvert de 142 semaines (ECZTEND ; NCT03587805 ) est en cours pour etudier l’efficacite et la tolerance a long terme du tralokinumab a raison de 300 mg toutes les deux semaines chez des patients ayant prealablement participe aux essais du tralokinumab dans la DA. Nous en presentons ici les resultats intermediaires d’efficacite bases sur les scores IGA et EASI. Resultats Au total, 1174 patients etaient inclus dans ECZTEND au moment de la cloture des donnees (avril 2020). Les resultats ont ete analyses tels qu’ils ont ete observes a la semaine 56 et ont pris en compte tous les patients inclus 60 semaines avant la cloture des donnees (n = 612). Le delai median entre la derniere dose de traitement dans les essais parents [3–5] et la premiere dose de traitement dans ECZTEND etait de 36 jours. L’âge median etait de 38 ans, 57 % etaient des hommes et la duree mediane de la DA etait de 27 ans a l’inclusion, pour tous les patients. A l’inclusion dans l’essai parent, a l’inclusion dans l’essai ECZTEND et a la semaine 56, les scores EASI medians (IQR) etaient respectivement de 26,9 (19,7–37,3), 4,8 (2,0–12,6) et 1,8 (0,4–5,6). A la semaine 56, les taux de reponse IGA et EASI etaient de 49,7 % (IGA 0/1), 95,1 % (EASI-50), 82,8 % (EASI-75), 61,0 % (EASI-90) et 79,7 % (EASI ≤ 7). Les analyses de sensibilite etaient coherentes en termes d’efficacite chez tous les patients observes. Les donnees de tolerance sont restees conformes a celles des essais parents. Discussion Ces donnees confirment que le tralokinumab peut entrainer des ameliorations a long terme et qu’il est bien tolere chez les patients atteints de DA moderee a severe.

N/A

N/A

N/A

Background Secukinumab has demonstrated significant efficacy with a good safety profile through 1 year in plaque psoriasis. Given the chronic nature of this disease, long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate psoriasis therapies fully. Objectives To determine the long-term (3-year) efficacy and safety of secukinumab in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Methods Patients completing 52 weeks of secukinumab treatment in the SCULPTURE core study entered an extension in which they continued the same double-blind regimens. Dosing regimens included a fixed-interval schedule (FI; every 4 weeks) and retreatment as needed (RAN), in which patients were withdrawn from secukinumab and received placebo until the start of relapse, at which time secukinumab every 4 weeks was reinitiated. The study was registered with number NCT01640951. Results In total 168 patients receiving secukinumab 300 mg FI and 172 receiving secukinumab 300 mg RAN entered the extension. Secukinumab 300 mg FI sustained high efficacy: at the end of year 3, the proportion of responders achieving ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) was 63·8%, and of PASI 100 responders it was 42·6%. The mean absolute PASI remained low (2-4) from week 52 to week 152 with 300 mg FI, with approximately two-thirds of patients reporting no impact of skin disease on their lives (Dermatology Life Quality Index of 0 or 1). Improvements in overall and subscale scores on all quality-of-life instruments were well sustained. As in the core study, FI dosing was consistently more efficacious than RAN. No new safety signals were identified to year 3. Conclusions Secukinumab 300 mg FI sustained high responses and improved quality of life with no new safety concerns through 3 years.

To assess improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with ixekizumab treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Adults with plaque psoriasis were enrolled in phase III, double-blind, randomised, controlled trials (UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2, or UNCOVER-3). All 3 protocols included a 12-week, placebo-controlled induction period; UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3 also had an active-control group (50 mg etanercept) during induction. After induction, patients in UNCOVER-1 and UNCOVER-2 entered a 48-week withdrawal (maintenance) period (Weeks 12–60), during which Week-12 sPGA (0,1) responders were rerandomized to receive placebo, or 80 mg ixekizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) or 12 weeks. As a secondary objective, HRQoL was measured by the generic Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) at baseline and Weeks 12 and 60. Changes in mean SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) and domain scores and proportions of patients reporting improvements ≥ minimal important differences in SF-36 scores were compared between groups. At Week 12, ixekizumab-treated patients (both dose groups in UNCOVER-1, -2, and -3) reported statistically significantly greater improvements in mean SF-36 PCS and MCS and all 8 SF-36 domain scores versus placebo. Further, more ixekizumab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients reported at least minimal treatment responses in SF-36 PCS and MCS scores and domain scores. Overall improvements in SF-36 PCS and MCS scores were maintained through Week 60. Ixekizumab-treated patients reported statistically significant improvements in HRQoL at 12 weeks that persisted through 1 year.

not available.

not available.

not available.

not available.

Pruritus and skin discomfort/pain negatively impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The effects of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase inhibitor, on pruritus, skin discomfort/pain, and patient global assessment of psoriasis disease activity (PgAPDA) were assessed in moderate/severe chronic plaque psoriasis patients in the phase 3 ESTEEM trials. Significant improvements in pruritus and skin discomfort/pain observed at Week 2 with apremilast versus placebo (both studies, p

Background Etanercept is well tolerated and effective in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. However, effectiveness and safety data beyond 2.5 years have not been reported. Objective We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety profile of up to 4 years of etanercept therapy in psoriasis. Methods We analyzed prospective data from previous trials and open-label extensions, including 506 patients who initiated etanercept therapy in either of two phase III trials. Patients received etanercept, 25 mg twice weekly, 50 mg weekly, or 50 mg twice weekly, depending on which trial therapy was started. Dosage adjustments were allowed in open-label extensions, but no patients exceeded 50 mg twice weekly. Outcomes included change from baseline for the static Physician Global Assessment and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores. Exposure-adjusted adverse event (AE) rates were calculated. Results In all, 75.9% (95% confidence interval 67.9-84.0) and 27.8% (95% confidence interval 19.3-36.2) maintained Dermatology Life Quality Index response (≥5-point improvement from baseline) and static Physician Global Assessment response (clear or almost clear) at 48 months, respectively. AE and serious AE rates were 243.5 and 7.8 events per 100 patient-years, respectively. No serious AE rates exceeded 1.0 event per 100 patient-years. Overall infection and serious infection rates were 96.9 and 0.9 events per 100 patient-years, respectively. No cases of tuberculosis or lymphoma were reported. Limitations Effectiveness data were limited to static Physician Global Assessment and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores. Analysis of AE rates was limited to available comparator databases. Conclusion Etanercept demonstrated sustained effectiveness and a favorable safety profile with no cumulative toxicity for up to 4 years, representing, to our knowledge, the longest published study on etanercept use in psoriasis to date.

Acne has a significant negative impact on quality of life (QoL): lack of self-confidence, depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts. The objective was to assess the impact of an initial and continued therapy in severe acne patients through patient-related outcomes (PRO).In two sequential double-blind randomized studies, patients received either adapalene 0.1% and benzoyl peroxide 2.5% (A-BPO) or vehicle, associated with doxycycline 100 mg for 12 weeks. Patients having obtained at least a good improvement according to investigator global assessment were re-randomized for a 24-week therapy with A-BPO or vehicle. PROs were assessed using the Acne-QoL and a patient treatment satisfaction questionnaire.QoL was improved at week 12 in all domains with a significant difference for the Acne-symptoms domain (p0.001) in favor of the A-BPO regimen. Additional 24-week A-BPO treatment showed a sustained improvement, significant (p0.001) for all domains except for Acne-symptoms. In the vehicle arm, QoL significantly worsened for all domains (p0.03). At weeks 12 and 36, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving A-BPO vs. vehicle reported high satisfaction for five out of six treatment satisfaction items.The early and sustained improvement of these PROs is correlated to the fast onset of action of A-BPO, the treatment effectiveness and a good safety profile.

Quality of life assessments are important in the evaluation of new therapies for psoriasis.To determine the effect of voclosporin (VCS) treatment on quality of life in patients with psoriasis.451 plaque psoriasis patients with ≥ 10% body surface area involvement were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to 1 of 4 treatment groups (placebo, VCS 0.2 mg kg(-1) BID, VCS 0.3 mg kg(-1) BID, and VCS 0.4 mg kg(-1) BID) for up to 12 weeks of treatment. Quality of life was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI).At 12 weeks, patients treated with VCS 0.4 mg kg(-1) BID had statistically significantly more favourable assessments than placebo-treated patients in all domains of the DLQI and the PDI. Patients treated with VCS 0.3 mg kg(-1) BID had statistically significant improvements in 5 of 10 domains of the DLQI and all domains of the PDI. Patients treated with VCS 0.2 mg kg(-1) BID had statistically significant improvements in 4 of 10 domains of the DLQI and 2 of 4 domains of the PDI.Treatment with VCS 0.4 mg kg(-1) BID significantly improves the quality of life of patients with psoriasis.

Several biologics targeting different cytokines and receptors, including T-cell receptors, have been approved for psoriasis treatment. Siplizumab, a humanized anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody, may potentially provide an alternative therapy for psoriasis. Its safety profile and immunogenicity was examined in adults with plaque psoriasis. Two multicenter phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies: one tested two intravenous (I.V.) doses (0.012 and 0.04 mg/kg) of siplizumab every 2 weeks x 8 doses (124 patients); the second study tested three subcutaneous (S.C.) dose regimens of siplizumab (5 mg x 12 weeks, 5 mg x 6 weeks + placebo x 6 weeks, 7 mg x 4 weeks + placebo x 8 weeks), and placebo x 12 weeks (420 patients). Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory values were monitored. Immunogenicity was determined by anti-siplizumab antibodies quantification. In both studies, siplizumab exhibited an acceptable safety profile; most common AEs judged to be siplizumab related were lymphopenia, chills, and headache, reported at a higher frequency in the siplizumab-treated vs. placebo group. Siplizumab-related reductions in absolute lymphocyte count did not result in clinical evidence of immune suppression. Anti-siplizumab antibodies were detected after exposure to siplizumab; however, there was no evidence of an association between antibody development and AEs. Siplizumab exhibited an acceptable safety profile in adult patients with plaque psoriasis when administered as multiple I.V. or S.C. doses. Higher, clinically relevant doses of siplizumab would need to be tested to fully assess its safety.

SummaryBackground The interleukin-17 cytokine family plays a central role in psoriasis pathogenesis. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of brodalumab, a human anti-interleukin-17 receptor antibody, in treating patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Methods In this phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT01708590; AMAGINE-1), adult patients in the U.S.A., Canada and Europe were randomized to brodalumab (140 or 210 mg) or placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W), with an additional dose at week 1, for a 12-week induction phase. At week 12, patients receiving brodalumab who achieved static Physician's Global Assessment 0 or 1 (sPGA success) were rerandomized to the placebo or induction dose. After week 16, patients with sPGA ≥ 3 were re-treated with the induction dose. After ≥ 12 weeks of retreatment, patients with sPGA 2 for ≥ 4 weeks or sPGA ≥ 3 were rescued with brodalumab 210 mg Q2W. At week 12, patients randomized to brodalumab with sPGA ≥ 2 or placebo received brodalumab 210 mg Q2W. Coprimary end points were the percentage of patients with ≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) and sPGA success at week 12. Results There were 661 patients randomized: 220 placebo, 219 brodalumab 140 mg and 222 brodalumab 210 mg. At week 12, 60% (140 mg) and 83% (210 mg) vs. 3% (placebo) achieved PASI 75, and 54% (140 mg) and 76% (210 mg) vs. 1% (placebo) achieved sPGA success. The safety profile was considered acceptable. Conclusions Brodalumab therapy resulted in significant clinical benefit and an acceptable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Background Rebound in psoriasis is, by definition, a rapid worsening of disease following the discontinuation of therapy for psoriasis; it occurs following the abrupt discontinuation of many therapies. To prevent rebound on discontinuation of efalizumab, this study evaluated the effectiveness of transitioning patients to an alternative psoriasis therapy. Methods Patients (n = 130) received subcutaneous efalizumab 1 mg/kg/week for 12 weeks. Efalizumab was discontinued at 12 weeks; patients were evaluated for improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and a 12-week transition period was begun. Patients who achieved PASI improvement of 75% or more (PASI-75) at week 12 of efalizumab treatment were observed during the transition period and treated only if psoriasis recurred. Patients who did not attain PASI-75 at week 12 of efalizumab treatment were immediately transitioned to an alternative psoriasis therapy at the physician's discretion. All patients were evaluated for signs of rebound following efalizumab discontinuation. Results Rebound was not observed in any PASI-75 responder (n = 46). Rebound was observed in two of 32 patients who achieved between PASI-50 and PASI-75, and was more common in nonresponders (14/49). Rebound was observed in none of the eight patients treated with cyclosporine and in two of the 12 patients treated with methotrexate during the transition period. Conclusions These results suggest that efalizumab-responsive patients are less likely to experience rebound than nonresponders and may not require treatment until disease recurrence following efalizumab discontinuation. Efalizumab nonresponders are at higher risk of developing rebound and thus should be considered for transition to an appropriate psoriasis therapy immediately following efalizumab discontinuation.

Background Secukinumab has demonstrated high, sustained efficacy in psoriasis to 52 weeks on a fixed-interval regimen. Objective We sought to compare a retreatment-as-needed versus a fixed-interval regimen. Methods In this double-blind study, adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous secukinumab at 300 mg (n = 484) or 150 mg (n = 482) weekly from baseline until week 4, and at week 8. At week 12, patients achieving 75% or more improvement from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) were rerandomized to 2 dose levels of secukinumab retreatment as needed (n = 217, 300 mg; n = 206, 150 mg) or fixed interval (n = 217; n = 203). Primary end point was noninferiority of retreatment as needed versus fixed interval for maintaining PASI 75 to week 52. Results Secukinumab induced high responses by week 12 (84.4%-91.1% PASI 75 responders). From week 12 to week 52, more patients on fixed interval (78.2%, 300 mg; 62.1%, 150 mg) maintained PASI 75 versus retreatment as needed (67.7%; 52.4%); statistical noninferiority of retreatment as needed was not established. Overall safety, including very low incidences of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies ( Limitations The primary end point was developed without any known precedent. Conclusion Secukinumab fixed interval showed clear benefit versus the study-specified retreatment-as-needed regimen for maintaining efficacy. Both regimens exhibited safety consistent with previous trials. The potential of retreatment as needed with secukinumab warrants further investigation.

Early clinical studies suggested that the anti-interleukin-17 receptor A monoclonal antibody brodalumab has efficacy in the treatment of psoriasis.In two phase 3 studies (AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3), patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were randomly assigned to receive brodalumab (210 mg or 140 mg every 2 weeks), ustekinumab (45 mg for patients with a body weight ≤100 kg and 90 mg for patients100 kg), or placebo. At week 12, patients receiving brodalumab were randomly assigned again to receive a brodalumab maintenance dose of 210 mg every 2 weeks or 140 mg every 2 weeks, every 4 weeks, or every 8 weeks; patients receiving ustekinumab continued to receive ustekinumab every 12 weeks, and patients receiving placebo received 210 mg of brodalumab every 2 weeks. The primary aims were to evaluate the superiority of brodalumab over placebo at week 12 with respect to at least a 75% reduction in the psoriasis area-and-severity index score (PASI 75) and a static physician's global assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear skin), as well as the superiority of brodalumab over ustekinumab at week 12 with respect to a 100% reduction in PASI score (PASI 100).At week 12, the PASI 75 response rates were higher with brodalumab at the 210-mg and 140-mg doses than with placebo (86% and 67%, respectively, vs. 8% [AMAGINE-2] and 85% and 69%, respectively, vs. 6% [AMAGINE-3]; P0.001); the rates of sPGA scores of 0 or 1 were also higher with brodalumab (P0.001). The week 12 PASI 100 response rates were significantly higher with 210 mg of brodalumab than with ustekinumab (44% vs. 22% [AMAGINE-2] and 37% vs. 19% [AMAGINE-3], P0.001). The PASI 100 response rates with 140 mg of brodalumab were 26% in AMAGINE-2 (P=0.08 for the comparison with ustekinumab) and 27% in AMAGINE-3 (P=0.007). Rates of neutropenia were higher with brodalumab and with ustekinumab than with placebo. Mild or moderate candida infections were more frequent with brodalumab than with ustekinumab or placebo. Through week 52, the rates of serious infectious episodes were 1.0 (AMAGINE-2) and 1.3 (AMAGINE-3) per 100 patient-years of exposure to brodalumab.Brodalumab treatment resulted in significant clinical improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. (Funded by Amgen; AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01708603 and NCT01708629.).

Skin manifestations associated with diabetes mellitus are common and, with close scrutiny, can occur in most, if not all, patients. Little information is available on what common pathophysiologic thread is responsible for the skin manifestation and diabetes. Although controlled studies are lacking, a recognition of the skin manifestations, treatment, and prognosis will help patients and their caregivers to understand treatment alternatives more clearly.

Several biologics targeting different cytokines and receptors, including T-cell receptors, have been approved for psoriasis treatment. Siplizumab, a humanized anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody, may potentially provide an alternative therapy for psoriasis. Its safety profile and immunogenicity was examined in adults with plaque psoriasis. Two multicenter phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies: one tested two intravenous (I.V.) doses (0.012 and 0.04 mg/kg) of siplizumab every 2 weeks x 8 doses (124 patients); the second study tested three subcutaneous (S.C.) dose regimens of siplizumab (5 mg x 12 weeks, 5 mg x 6 weeks + placebo x 6 weeks, 7 mg x 4 weeks + placebo x 8 weeks), and placebo x 12 weeks (420 patients). Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory values were monitored. Immunogenicity was determined by anti-siplizumab antibodies quantification. In both studies, siplizumab exhibited an acceptable safety profile; most common AEs judged to be siplizumab related were lymphopenia, chills, and headache, reported at a higher frequency in the siplizumab-treated vs. placebo group. Siplizumab-related reductions in absolute lymphocyte count did not result in clinical evidence of immune suppression. Anti-siplizumab antibodies were detected after exposure to siplizumab; however, there was no evidence of an association between antibody development and AEs. Siplizumab exhibited an acceptable safety profile in adult patients with plaque psoriasis when administered as multiple I.V. or S.C. doses. Higher, clinically relevant doses of siplizumab would need to be tested to fully assess its safety.

The efficacy and safety of efalizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic psoriasis has been established in studies of up to 3 years' duration. This study aims to describe the efficacy of up to 15 months' treatment with efalizumab and the convenience of therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Patients who had completed a 3-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase IIIb trial entered a 12-month extension study and received efalizumab, 1 mg/kg/week administered subcutaneously, for up to 12 months. Of 450 patients originally randomly assigned to receive efalizumab, 40.9% achieved a reduction of > or = 75% in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score after 15 months of treatment. Improvements were also observed on the frequency and severity subscales of the Psoriasis Symptom Assessment. The majority of patients reported that efalizumab treatment was more or much more convenient than other psoriasis treatments. Efalizumab, 1 mg/kg/week, provides long-term efficacy and good convenience with up to 15 months of continuous treatment.

New biologic therapies focused primarily on cytokine pathways, some targeting T cell-mediated immune responses, are being developed for the treatment of psoriasis. Siplizumab is a humanized anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody that interferes with costimulation necessary for T cell activation and proliferation. We assessed the biological activity, serum concentrations, and pharmacodynamic effects of siplizumab in patients with plaque psoriasis. Two multicenter, phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted: one study randomized 124 patients to one of two intravenous (IV) doses (0.012 and 0.04 mg/kg) of siplizumab, given every 2 weeks x 8 doses; the other study randomized 420 patients to one of three subcutaneous (SC) dose regimens of siplizumab given weekly (5 mg for 12 weeks, 5 mg for 6 weeks, and 7 mg for 4 weeks) or placebo for 12 weeks. Adults with plaque psoriasis involving > or =10% of the body surface area and who were not receiving psoriasis therapy were eligible. Treatment with siplizumab resulted in reductions in psoriasis severity, but most of the effects were not statistically significant compared with placebo. Statistically significant differences among IV siplizumab-treated and placebo groups were observed at study day 28, with greater psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score reductions from baseline in the siplizumab groups. The difference in PASI50 response rates between the 0.04 mg/kg siplizumab and placebo groups was also statistically significant at day 28. A trend toward clinical improvement was observed in SC siplizumab-treated groups. Significant reductions in circulating absolute lymphocyte counts and CD2+ (CD3+, CD8+, and CD16+/56+), but not CD2- (CD19+ and CD14+), lymphocyte populations were observed. These changes were not accompanied by concomitant reductions in infiltrating CD3+ lymphocytes in psoriatic lesions, epidermal thickness, or keratin 16 (K16) and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM) expression. The effect of siplizumab did not differentially affect CD45RO+ and CD45RA+ lymphocytes. Low or undetectable mean trough serum concentrations of siplizumab following IV or SC treatment were observed. Pharmacokinetic data coupled with higher-than-expected placebo clinical response rates may partly explain siplizumab's marginal clinical activity. Higher doses of siplizumab may be required to detect significant improvements in psoriasis; however, further development of this agent was not planned.

Background Efalizumab is a humanised recombinant monoclonal IgG1 antibody for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. When treatment discontinuation is necessary, however, some patients may experience inflammatory recurrence of the disease, which can progress to rebound if untreated. This analysis evaluated approaches for managing inflammatory recurrence after discontinuation of efalizumab. Methods An open-label, multicentre, investigational study was performed in 41 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who had recently completed clinical studies with efalizumab and had developed signs of inflammatory recurrence following abrupt cessation of treatment. Patients were assigned by the attending physicians to receive one of five standardised alternative systemic psoriasis treatment regimens for 12 weeks. Efficacy of the different therapy options was assessed using the physician's global assessment (PGA) of change over time. Results More favourable PGA responses were observed in patients changing to cyclosporin (PGA of 'good', 'excellent' or 'cleared': 7/10 patients, 70.0%) or methotrexate (9/20, 45.0%), compared with those receiving systemic corticosteroids (2/8, 25.0%), retinoids (0/1, 0.0%) or combined corticosteroids plus methotrexate (0/2, 0.0%). While the majority (77.8%) of patients showed inflammatory morphology at baseline, following 12 weeks of the alternative therapies the overall prevalence of inflammatory disease was decreased to 19.2%. Conclusion Inflammatory recurrence after discontinuation of efalizumab therapy is a manageable event, with a number of therapies and approaches available to physicians, including short courses of cyclosporin or methotrexate.

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic, incurable immune-mediated disease. Most therapies used for moderate to severe psoriasis are immunosuppressive. Agents that depress immune function, including traditional psoriasis therapies, have been associated with an increased incidence of malignancies. Efalizumab is a recombinant monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) antibody approved for use in psoriasis patients. Objectives: To evaluate the incidence of malignancy in patients receiving efalizumab during clinical trials compared with placebo-treated patients, psoriasis patients from external cohorts and the general US population. Methods: Patient data were pooled from multiple phase III placebo-controlled, open-label efalizumab clinical trials, and the incidence rate of reported malignancies was calculated as a function of patient years of observation. The results for the efalizumab-treated patients were compared with the data on psoriasis patients from insurance claims databases and a registry of events in the general population. Results: The efalizumab- and placebo-treated patients had similar incidence rates of malignancy, including lymphoproliferative disease, solid tumor, malignant melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer. The incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancers, including basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, in patients receiving efalizumab or placebo was elevated relative to the external databases. Conclusions: These results suggest that efalizumab treatment does not increase a patient’s risk for malignancy. The difference observed with nonmelanoma skin cancer may be due to biases introduced by the clinical trial methodology. Additional patient observation is necessary to ascertain whether a link exists between efalizumab therapy and nonmelanoma skin cancer above that normally observed in psoriasis patients.

Psoriasis is a chronic disease, the severity of which varies among patients and changes unpredictably over time in individual patients. Psoriasis can be exacerbated during treatment by infection, endocrine factors, hypocalcemia, medications, psychologic stress, skin trauma, or other factors. Patients who discontinue treatments may experience a return of disease--relapse--or worsening of disease--rebound. The National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) proposed standardized definitions of relapse and rebound. Efalizumab, a recombinant humanized immunoglobulin G-1 monoclonal antibody, is approved for the management of psoriasis. During efalizumab clinical trials, a small percentage of patients experienced protocol-defined adverse events related to psoriasis. After publication of the NPF definition of rebound, post hoc exploratory analyses of the efalizumab clinical trial data were performed. The efalizumab clinical trial investigators discussed their observations, the analyses, and their individual approaches to the treatment of patients receiving or discontinuing efalizumab therapy, the conclusions of which are described herein.

Interactions between leukocyte-function-associated antigen type 1 (LFA-1) and intercellular adhesion molecules are important in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Efalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, binds to the alpha subunit (CD11a) of LFA-1 and inhibits the activation of T cells.In a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, we assign 597 subjects with psoriasis to receive subcutaneous efalizumab (1 or 2 mg per kilogram of body weight per week) or placebo for 12 weeks. Depending on the response after 12 weeks, subjects received an additional 12 weeks of treatment with efalizumab or placebo. Study treatments were discontinued at week 24, and subjects were followed for an additional 12 weeks.At week 12, there was an improvement of 75 percent or more in the psoriasis area-and-severity index in 22 percent of the subjects who had received 1 mg of efalizumab per kilogram per week and 28 percent of those who had received 2 mg of efalizumab per kilogram per week, as compared with 5 percent of the subjects in the placebo group (P0.001 for both comparisons). Efalizumab-treated subjects had greater improvement than those in the placebo group as early as week 4 (P0.001). Among the efalizumab-treated subjects who had an improvement of 75 percent or more at week 12, improvement was maintained through week 24 in 77 percent of those who continued to receive efalizumab, as compared with 20 percent of those who were switched to placebo (P0.001 for both comparisons). After the discontinuation of efalizumab at week 24, an improvement of 50 percent or more in the psoriasis area-and-severity index was maintained in approximately 30 percent of subjects during the 12 weeks of follow-up. Efalizumab was well tolerated, and adverse events were generally mild to moderate.Efalizumab therapy resulted in significant improvements in plaque psoriasis in subjects with moderate-to-severe disease. Extending treatment from 12 to 24 weeks resulted in both maintenance and improvement of responses.