Search

Lindsay L Benster,1 Cory R Weissman,2 Zafiris J Daskalakis2 1Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, SDSU/UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA; 2Department of Psychiatry, UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USACorrespondence: Lindsay L Benster, Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, SDSU/UC San Diego, 6363 Alvarado Ct, San Diego, CA, 92120, USA, Tel +1206 230 0707, Email llbenster@ucsd.eduAbstract: Suicidal ideation (SI) is understudied in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Nonetheless, evidence suggests increased risk for SI in individuals with OCD compared to the general population. Understanding the relationship between SI and OCD involves investigating risk factors associated with SI. Furthering knowledge of links is essential for enhancing outcomes and decreasing experiences of SI through improving treatment interventions. Additionally, increasing awareness of factors that lead SI to suicide attempts (SA) is vital. To best illustrate the current state of knowledge, this scoping review examines risk factors for SI, including symptom profiles or phenotypes, comorbid diagnoses, sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, childhood trauma, and genetic and familial contributions. Important treatment considerations for targeting SI within the context of OCD are detailed with respect to the current evidence for psychotherapy, pharmacology, brain stimulation, and neurosurgery. Gaps in the literature and future directions are identified, broadly with respect to studies examining the treatment of SI within the context of OCD, particular OCD phenotypes, and factors influencing SI in pediatric OCD. Due to the relative novelty of this area of exploration, many unknowns persist regarding onset of SI in OCD, factors contributing to the maintenance of SI in OCD, and relevant treatment protocols. Findings suggest that individuals with previous SI or SA, history of childhood trauma, significant life stress, and psychiatric comorbidities, particularly depression, should be closely monitored and screened for SI.Keywords: suicidality, OCD, risk factors, SI treatment

Daphne Voineskos, 1, 2 Zafiris J Daskalakis, 1, 2 Daniel M Blumberger 1, 2 1Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaCorrespondence: Daniel M BlumbergerCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, 1001 Queen Street West, Unit 4-1, Toronto, Ontario M6J1H4, CanadaTel +1 416 535-8501Fax +1 416 583-1358Email daniel.blumberger@camh.caAbstract: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a subset of Major Depressive Disorder which does not respond to traditional and first-line therapeutic options. There are several definitions and staging models of TRD and a consensus for each has not yet been established. However, in common for each model is the inadequate response to at least 2 trials of antidepressant pharmacotherapy. In this review, a comprehensive analysis of existing literature regarding the challenges and management of TRD has been compiled. A PubMed search was performed to assemble meta-analyses, trials and reviews on the topic of TRD. First, we address the confounds in the definitions and staging models of TRD, and subsequently the difficulties inherent in assessing the illness. Pharmacological augmentation strategies including lithium, triiodothyronine and second-generation antipsychotics are reviewed, as is switching of antidepressant class. Somatic therapies, including several modalities of brain stimulation (electroconvulsive therapy, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, magnetic seizure therapy and deep brain stimulation) are detailed, psychotherapeutic strategies and subsequently novel therapeutics including ketamine, psilocybin, anti-inflammatories and new directions are reviewed in this manuscript. Our review of the evidence suggests that further large-scale work is necessary to understand the appropriate treatment pathways for TRD and to prescribe effective therapeutic options for patients suffering from TRD.Keywords: treatment resistant depression, major depressive disorder, pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, brain stimulation, novel therapies

Yuliya O Knyahnytska,1,2 Daniel M Blumberger,1–3 Zafiris J Daskalakis,1,2 Reza Zomorrodi,1 Allan S Kaplan1,2 1Temerty Centre for Therapeutic- Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 3Geriatric Division, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaIntroduction: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a complex disorder of unknown etiology, characterized by obsessions and compulsions around body shape, weight, and calorie intake. In the course of AN, 10%–30% will recover, while the rest will develop a treatment-resistant course with a high mortality rate due to AN-related complications. The insula is a region in the brain of considerable interest to its role in gustatory modulation, feeding behavior, and processing of interoceptive stimuli.Objective: Recent advances in the neurophysiology of AN suggest insula dysfunction as a potential biomarker for people with severe and enduring AN (SE-AN). Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) is of particular interest in SE-AN because of its ability to target deep areas of the brain.Design: We conducted a pilot study to investigate the feasibility and safety of insula dTMS in subjects with SE-AN.Results: We found that dTMS is a safe and well-tolerated treatment. We also found a reduction in AN-related obsessions and compulsions, as well as depression and anxiety scores from baseline to the end of the trial. Due to small sample size, the results of this study should be interpreted with great caution.Discussion: The results suggest that dTMS is safe and well tolerated and may be of some clinical interest in patients with SE-AN. However, to determine the true efficacy of dTMS for SE-AN, there is a need to conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing real versus sham dTMS in a larger number of AN subjects.Keywords: severe and enduring anorexia nervosa, deep transcranial magnetic stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, insula

Christine E Dobek,1 Daniel M Blumberger,2 Jonathan Downar,3 Zafiris J Daskalakis,2 Fidel Vila-Rodriguez11Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Non-Invasive Neurostimulation Therapies (NINET) Laboratory, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, 2Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 3Department of Psychiatry, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaObjective: When considering repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for major depressive disorder, clinicians often face a lack of detailed information on potential interactions between rTMS and pharmacotherapy. This is particularly relevant to patients receiving bupropion, a commonly prescribed antidepressant with lower risk of sexual side effects or weight increase, which has been associated with increased risk of seizure in particular populations. Our aim was to systematically review the information on seizures occurred with rTMS to identify the potential risk factors with attention to concurrent medications, particularly bupropion.Data sources: We conducted a systematic review through the databases PubMed, PsycINFO, and EMBASE between 1980 and June 2015. Additional articles were found using reference lists of relevant articles. Reporting of data follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.Study selection: Two reviewers independently screened articles reporting the occurrence of seizures during rTMS. Articles reporting seizures in epilepsy during rTMS were excluded. A total of 25 rTMS-induced seizures were included in the final review.Data extraction: Data were systematically extracted, and the authors of the applicable studies were contacted when appropriate to provide more detail about the seizure incidents.Results: Twenty-five seizures were identified. Potential risk factors emerged such as sleep deprivation, polypharmacy, and neurological insult. High-frequency-rTMS was involved in a percentage of the seizures. None of these seizures reported had patients taking bupropion in the literature review. One rTMS-induced seizure was reported from the Food and Drug Administration in a sleep-deprived patient who was concurrently taking bupropion, sertraline, and amphetamine.Conclusion: During the consent process, potential risk factors for an rTMS-induced seizure should be carefully screened for and discussed. Data do not support considering concurrent bupropion treatment as contraindication to undergo rTMS.Keywords: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, seizures, bupropion, consent process, interaction

Yoshihiro Noda,1,2 Zafiris J Daskalakis,1–3 Jonathan Downar,4 Paul E Croarkin,5 Paul B Fitzgerald,6 Daniel M Blumberger1–3 1Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 2Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, 3Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 4MRI-Guided rTMS Clinic, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; 5Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; 6Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred and Monash University Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Australia Abstract: Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) has shown efficacy in adult patients with treatment-resistant depression with limited impairment in memory. To date, the use of MST in adolescent depression has not been reported. Here we describe the first successful use of MST in the treatment of an adolescent patient with refractory bipolar depression. This patient received MST in an ongoing open-label study for treatment-resistant major depression. Treatments employed a twin-coil MST apparatus, with the center of each coil placed over the frontal cortex (ie, each coil centered over F3 and F4). MST was applied at 100 Hz and 100% machine output at progressively increasing train durations. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and cognitive function was assessed with a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. This adolescent patient achieved full remission of clinical symptoms after an acute course of 18 MST treatments and had no apparent cognitive decline, other than some autobiographical memory impairment that may or may not be related to the MST treatment. This case report suggests that MST may be a safe and well tolerated intervention for adolescents with treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Pilot studies to further evaluate the effectiveness and safety of MST in adolescents warrant consideration. Keywords: brain stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, adolescent depression, cognitive effects

OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively examine the effects of haloperidol and olanzapine on spontaneous motor activity in normal subjects. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled medication study. PARTICIPANTS: Normal volunteers (n = 30). INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received 1 dose of either haloperidol 2 mg (n = 9), olanzapine 10 mg (n = 10) or placebo (n = 10) and were admitted to hospital for the next 24 hours. OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects wore an actigraphic monitor, which recorded movement in 15-second epochs. The Simpson-Angus Extrapyramidal Side Effect Scale (SAS) and the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) were administered before and 7 and 24 hours after medication was given. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, total motor activity was decreased by 41% with olanzapine (p = 0.004) and by 12% with haloperidol (NS). There were significantly more epochs with zero movement with olanzapine than with haloperidol or placebo. For non-zero epochs, the mean activity count and the distribution of activity counts did not differ significantly among groups. There were no positive findings on the SAS or the BAS. CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine decreased total motor activity by increasing the amount of time during which subjects were immobile, rather than by affecting the magnitude of movement during periods in which there was activity. This effect occurred at a dose of olanzapine low enough not to cause clinically observed extrapyramidal side effects. Our results suggest that actigraphy is useful as a sensitive, noninvasive tool for measuring the effect of antipsychotics on spontaneous motor activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Treatment of schizophrenia (SCZ) was revolutionized with the development of the antipsychotic medications. Although imaging studies have linked antipsychotic D₂ receptor occupancy and clinical response in SCZ, heterogeneity between cohorts and methods has made it challenging to generalize findings across studies. The main objective of this meta-analysis was to analyze the relationship between in vivo estimation of typical and atypical antipsychotic D₂ receptor occupancy and treatment response in SCZ.Methods: Using the keywords "dopamine D₂ receptor occupancy," "schizophrenia," "PET/SPECT" and "antipsychotics," and further refining our search to journal articles with information on % striatal D₂ occupancy and % change in clinical symptoms as indexed by either the BPRS or the PANSS, our final analysis consisted of 16 imaging studies (20 cohorts; N=206).Results: The first step of the meta-analysis confirmed the positive relationship between antipsychotic medication and clinical improvement in SCZ (ES=1.36; 95% CI: 1.13-1.60). The second step of our analysis revealed that when D₂ occupancy was limited to less than 80% in order to control for the appearance of extrapyramidal symptoms, high D₂ occupancy was correlated with reduction in clinical scores (r=0.4, p<0.001) for medications other than clozapine or quetiapine.Conclusions: Our results suggest that D₂ occupancy is a contributing factor for the mechanism of antipsychotic effect in SCZ for some but not all antipsychotic medications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to optimally evaluate the effect of the long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) through transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) by eliminating the volume conductance with signal source estimation and using a realistic sham coil as a control., Methods: We compared the LICI effects from the DLPFC between the active and sham stimulation conditions in 27 healthy participants. Evoked responses between the two conditions were evaluated at the sensor and source levels., Results: At the sensor level, a significant LICI effect was confirmed in the active condition in the global mean field power analysis; however, in the local mean field power analysis focused on the DLPFC, no LICI effect was observed in the active condition. However, in the signal source estimation analysis for the DLPFC, we could reconfirm a significant LICI effect (p = 0.023) in the interval 30-250 ms post-stimulus, compared to the sham condition., Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that application of realistic sham stimulation condition and source estimation method allows for a robust and optimal identification of the LICI effect in the DLPFC., Significance: The optimal DLPFC-LICI effect was identified by the use of the sophisticated sham coil., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has demonstrated potential in reducing suicidal ideation (SI) in patients with depression, however, stimulation protocols vary greatly across studies. For this secondary analysis, data from a three-site double-blind, randomized and sham-controlled clinical trial was analyzed to investigate the efficacy of a once-daily versus twice-daily iTBS protocol in the treatment of SI in patients with treatment resistant depression. Secondarily we aimed to explore the associations among SI, anhedonia and quality of life (QOL) measures. The primary outcome for this analysis was SI, which was assessed by computing an average score from four suicidality items on separate depression scales. 158 participants who experienced some degree of SI at baseline were included in the analysis. After 10 days of treatment, 15 (18.3%) participants from the once-daily group and 19 (25%) from the twice-daily group achieved remission from SI which was defined as a SI score of 0. After 30 days of treatment the remission rates were 27 (32.9%) and 30 (39.5%), respectively. There were no significant differences in remission rates between the groups. Moderate correlations between change in SI and change in depressive symptoms were observed. In addition, correlations between change in SI, anhedonia and QOL were observed that remained significant after controlling for change in depressive symptoms. Achieving remission from SI appears to be at least partially correlated to the anti-depressant effect of iTBS. Further studies investigating optimal treatment protocols for the treatment of suicidality with different iTBS schedules are urgently needed. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02729792 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02729792 )., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments. All patients gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Conflict of interest LZ declares no conflict of interest. FVR receives research support from CIHR, Brain Canada, Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and Weston Brain Institute for investigator-initiated research. Philanthropic support from Seedlings Foundation. In-kind equipment support for investigator-initiated research from MagVenture. He has received honoraria for participation in an advisory board for Allergan. FVR is a volunteer director on the board of directors of the British Columbia Schizophrenia Society. JD reports research support from NIH, CIHR, Brain Canada, Ontario Brain Institute, the Klarman Family Foundation, the Arrell Family Foundation, and the Buchan Family Foundation, in-kind equipment support for investigator-initiated trials from MagVenture, is an advisor for BrainCheck, Arc Health Partners and Salience Neuro Health, and is a co-founder of Ampa Health. TK receives research support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and the AFP Innovation Fund. ZJD, in the last 10 years, has received research and equipment in-kind support for an investigator-initiated study through Brainsway Inc and Magventure Inc. He also currently serves on the scientific advisory board for Brainsway Inc. His work has been supported by the National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Brain Canada and the Temerty Family, Grant and Kreutzkamp Family Foundations. DMB receives research support from CIHR, NIH, Brain Canada, Patient Centred Outcomes Research Institute and the Temerty Family through the CAMH Foundation and the Campbell Family Research Institute. He received research support and in-kind equipment support for an investigator-initiated study from Brainsway Ltd. He was the site principal investigator for three sponsor-initiated studies for Brainsway Ltd. He also received in-kind equipment support from Magventure for two investigator-initiated studies. He received medication supplies for an investigator-initiated trial from Indivior. He is a scientific advisor for Sooma Medical. He is the Co-Chair of the Clinical Standards Committee of the Clinical TMS Society (unpaid)., (© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Late-life depression (LLD) is associated with cognitive impairment, but substantial heterogeneity exists among patients. Data on the extent of cognitive impairments are inconclusive, particularly in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). We investigated the cognitive profiles of patients with treatment-resistant versus nonresistant LLD and aimed to identify distinct cognitive subgroups. We also examined whether cognitive subgroups responded differentially to treatment with bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)., Methods: A total of 165 patients with LLD were divided into treatment-resistant and nonresistant groups and compared with healthy control participants on measures of executive function, information processing speed, verbal learning, and memory. Cluster analysis identified subgroups based on cognitive scores. Demographic and clinical variables, as well as outcomes with bilateral rTMS, were compared between cognitive subgroups., Results: Patients with LLD, particularly TRD, exhibited significantly worse cognitive performance than healthy controls. A 3-cluster solution was found, including cognitively intact (n = 89), cognitively diminished (n = 29), and impaired memory (n = 47) subgroups. Both the cognitively diminished and impaired memory subgroups had more anxiety symptoms and a higher proportion of patients with TRD than the cognitively intact group, although the latter difference did not survive multiple comparison correction. No significant differences were observed in outcomes to rTMS treatment., Conclusions: Patients with LLD exhibited impairments across cognitive domains, which were more pronounced in TRD. Three cognitive subgroups responded similarly to rTMS treatment, indicating its effectiveness across cognitive profiles, especially when medications are not tolerated. Future research should examine the relationships among cognitive subgroups, cognitive decline, and neurodegeneration., (Copyright © 2024 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Older adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are at high risk for cognitive decline., Objective: To assess the efficacy of cognitive remediation (CR) plus transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the prefrontal cortex in slowing cognitive decline, acutely improving cognition, and reducing progression to MCI or dementia in older adults with remitted MDD (rMDD), MCI, or both., Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 5 academic hospitals in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants were older adults who had rMDD (with or without MCI, age ≥65 y) or MCI without rMDD (age ≥60 y). Assessments were made at baseline, month 2, and yearly from baseline for 3 to 7 years., Interventions: CR plus tDCS (hereafter, active) or sham plus sham 5 days a week for 8 weeks followed by twice-a-year 5-day boosters and daily at-home CR or sham CR., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in global composite cognitive score. Secondary outcomes included changes in 6 cognitive domains, moderating effect of the diagnosis, moderating effect of APOE ε4 status, change in composite score at month 2, and progression to MCI or dementia over time., Results: Of 486 older adults who provided consent, 375 (with rMDD, MCI, or both) received at least 1 intervention session (mean [SD] age, 72.2 [6.4] years; 232 women [62%] and 143 men [38%]). Over a median follow-up of 48.3 months (range, 2.1-85.9), CR and tDCS slowed cognitive decline in older adults with rMDD or MCI (adjusted z score difference [active - sham] at month 60, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.35; likelihood ratio test [LRT] P = .006). In the preplanned primary analysis, CR and tDCS did not improve cognition acutely (adjusted z score difference [active - sham] at month 2, 0.06, 95% CI, -0.006 to 0.12). Similarly, the effect of CR and tDCS on delaying progression from normal cognition to MCI or MCI to dementia was weak and not significant (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.08; P = .10). Preplanned analyses showed treatment effects for executive function (LRT P = .04) and verbal memory (LRT P = .02) and interactions with diagnosis (P = .01) and APOE ε4 (P < .001) demonstrating a larger effect among those with rMDD and in noncarriers of APOE ε4., Conclusions and Relevance: The study showed that CR and tDCS, both targeting the prefrontal cortex, is efficacious in slowing cognitive decline in older adults at risk of cognitive decline, particularly those with rMDD (with or without MCI) and in those at low genetic risk for Alzheimer disease., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02386670.

Background: Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) that can be administered in a fraction of the time of standard rTMS. Applying multiple daily iTBS sessions (ie, accelerated iTBS) may enable patients to achieve remission more rapidly. However, questions remain regarding the optimal time interval between treatment sessions., Objective: The overall aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of two accelerated bilateral iTBS protocols (ie, 30-min or 60-min intervals) and a once-daily bilateral iTBS protocol (ie, 0-min interval) while the number of pulses was held constant, in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD)., Methods: 182 patients with TRD were randomised to receive two sessions per day of bilateral iTBS of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC) at 60-min, 30-min or 0-min intervals. Sham treatments were delivered using a shielded 'sham coil' which produced the auditory and tactile sensations of stimulation. The primary outcome measure was a change in depression scores on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17) after 20 days of treatment., Results: HRSD-17 scores improved across all groups; however, these improvements did not significantly differ between the three groups after 20 days of treatment. Similarly, response and remission rates did not differ between the treatment groups., Conclusions: These results suggest that contrary to our original hypothesis, implementing a 30-min or 60-min interval between two treatment sessions of DMPFC-iTBS does not lead to a more rapid improvement in symptoms, than once-daily iTBS administration., Trial Registration Number: NCT02778035., Competing Interests: Competing interests: FM reports grants from Mitacs, outside the submitted work. LS reports grants from Ontario Mental Health Foundation, outside the submitted work. TSK has received research support from CIHR and the AFP Innovation Fund. JD has received research and equipment in-kind support for an investigator-initiated study through Brainsway and Magventure. He is also on the scientific advisory board for Brainsway. His work has been supported by the National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Brain Canada and the Temerty Family and Grant Family Foundations. JD has received research support from NIH, CIHR, Brain Canada, Ontario Brain Institute, the Klarman Family Foundation, the Krembil Foundation, Arrell Family Foundation and the Buchan Family Foundation, in-kind equipment support for investigator-initiated trials from MagVenture, is an advisor for BrainCheck, Arc Health Partners and Salience Neuro Health, and is a co-founder of Ampa Health. DMB receives research support from CIHR, NIMH (R01MH112815;R21MH128815; R01MH1192850), Brain Canada and the Temerty Family through the CAMH Foundation and the Campbell Family Research Institute. He received research support and in-kind equipment support for an investigator-initiated study from Brainsway. He was the site principal investigator for three sponsor-initiated studies for Brainsway. He also received in-kind equipment support from Magventure for two investigator-initiated studies. He received medication supplies for an investigator-initiated trial from Indivior. He is a scientific advisor for Sooma Medical. He is the Co-Chair of the Clinical Standards Committee of the Clinical TMS Society (unpaid). APT, GK and MG declares no conflicts of interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. Published by BMJ.)

In response to restrictions on electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) access during COVID-19, we designed a trial to assess the clinical outcomes service impacts, employing an extended course of accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS), in patients with moderate to severe depression in need of ECT. This open label clinical trial was comprised of 3 phases: (i) an acute phase, where iTBS treatments were administered 8 times daily, for up to 10 days; (ii) a tapering phase of 2 treatment days per week for 2 weeks, followed by 1 treatment day per week for 2 weeks; and (iii) a symptom-based relapse prevention phase, whereby treatments were scheduled based on symptom re-emergence, for up to 6 months. Of the 155 patients who completed the acute phase of the study, the remission rate was 16.1%. The mean reduction from baseline on the HRSD-24 was 29.4% (p < 0.001) and the response rate was 25.2%. Of the 110 patients who completed the tapering phase, the mean reduction from baseline was 42.6% (p < 0.001) and response and remission rates were 49.6% and 34.8%, respectively. Of the 61 patients who were eligible for the relapse prevention phase, 43 completed, with a mean reduction from baseline of 60.1% (p < 0.001); 7 patients relapsed during this phase. This study demonstrated that an extended aiTBS protocol safely led to meaningful clinical outcomes in patients with severe depression, who otherwise would have received ECT, and thus reduced pressure on ECT services during the pandemic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04384965 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04384965?term=NCT04384965&rank=1 )., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American College of Neuropsychopharmacology.)

Background and Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a safe and effective treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD); however, this treatment currently lacks reliable biomarkers of treatment response. TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), measured using TMS-electroencephalography (TMS-EEG), have been suggested as potential biomarker candidates, with the N100 peak being one of the most promising. This study investigated the association between baseline N100 amplitude and 1 Hz right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (R-DLPFC) accelerated rTMS (arTMS) treatment in MDD., Methods: Baseline TMS-EEG sessions were performed for 23 MDD patients. All patients then underwent 40 sessions of 1 Hz R-DLPFC (F4) arTMS over 5 days and a follow-up TMS-EEG session one week after the end of theses arTMS sessions., Results: Baseline N100 amplitude at F4 showed a strong positive association (p < .001) with treatment outcome. The association between the change in N100 amplitude (baseline to follow-up) and treatment outcome did not remain significant after Bonferroni correction (p = .06, corrected; p = .03, uncorrected). Furthermore, treatment responders had a significantly larger mean baseline F4 TEP amplitude during the N100 time frame compared to non-responders (p < .001). Topographically, after Bonferroni correction, F4 is the only electrode at which its baseline N100 amplitude showed a significant positive association (p < .001) with treatment outcome., Limitations: Lack of control group and auditory masking., Conclusion: Baseline N100 amplitude showed a strong association with treatment outcome and thus demonstrated great potential to be utilized as a cost-effective and widely adoptable biomarker of rTMS treatment in MDD., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest JZS, FMazza, DM, FMansouri, TR, RZ, MH, LF, HV, EBA do not report any conflict of interest. DMB receives research support from CIHR, NIH, Brain Canada and the Temerty Family through the CAMH Foundation and the Campbell Research Institute. He received research support and in-kind equipment support for an investigator-initiated study from Brainsway Ltd. and he has been the site principal investigator for sponsor-initiated studies for Brainsway Ltd. He also receives in-kind equipment support from Magventure for investigator-initiated studies. He received medication supplies for an investigator-initiated trial from Indivior. ZJD has received research and equipment in-kind support for an investigator-initiated study through Brainsway Inc. and Magventure Inc. His work has been supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Brain Canada and the Temerty Family and Grant Family and through the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Foundation and the Campbell Institute. JD has received research support from the Arrell Family Foundation, the Buchan Family Foundation, Brain Canada, the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Klarman Family Foundation, NIH, the Ontario Brain Institute, the Toronto General and Western Hospital Foundation, and the Weston Family Foundation; he has received travel stipends from Lundbeck and ANT Neuro; he has served as an advisor for BrainCheck, Restorative Brain Clinics, and TMS Neuro Solutions, holds equity in Arc Health Partners, and is a co-founder of Ampa. JPM reports research support from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation (BBRF), the Réseau Québécois sur le Suicide, les troubles de l'Humeur et les troubles Associés (RQSHA), the Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), the Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé (FRQS), the Branch Out Neurological Foundation, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). JDG has received research support from the Labatt Family Network, the CAMH Discovery Fund, the University of Toronto EMHSeed program, and the Tri-Council Canada-UK AI Initiative., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background/hypothesis: There is increasing awareness of interindividual variability in brain function, with potentially major implications for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) efficacy. We perform a secondary analysis using data from a double-blind randomized controlled 4-week trial of 20 Hz active versus sham rTMS to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during a working memory task in participants with schizophrenia. We hypothesized that rTMS would change local functional activity and variability in the active group compared with sham., Study Design: 83 participants were randomized in the original trial, and offered neuroimaging pre- and post-treatment. Of those who successfully completed both scans (n = 57), rigorous quality control left n = 42 (active/sham: n = 19/23), who were included in this analysis. Working memory-evoked activity during an N-Back (3-Back vs 1-Back) task was contrasted. Changes in local brain activity were examined from an 8 mm ROI around the rTMS coordinates. Individual variability was examined as the mean correlational distance (MCD) in brain activity pattern from each participant to others within the same group., Results: We observed an increase in task-evoked left DLPFC activity in the active group compared with sham (F1,36 = 5.83, False Discovery Rate (FDR))-corrected P = .04). Although whole-brain activation patterns were similar in both groups, active rTMS reduced the MCD in activation pattern compared with sham (F1,36 = 32.57, P < .0001). Reduction in MCD was associated with improvements in attention performance (F1,16 = 14.82, P = .0014, uncorrected)., Conclusions: Active rTMS to DLPFC reduces individual variability of brain function in people with schizophrenia. Given that individual variability is typically higher in schizophrenia patients compared with controls, such reduction may "normalize" brain function during higher-order cognitive processing., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: Conceptual similarities between depressive and negative symptoms complicate biomarker and intervention development. This study employed a data-driven approach to delineate the neural circuitry underlying depressive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs)., Methods: Data from three studies were analyzed (157 participants with SSDs) to assess brain-behavior relationships: two neuroimaging studies and a randomized trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Partial least squares correlation (PLSC) was used to investigate associations between resting-state functional connectivity and depressive and negative symptoms. Secondary analyses of rTMS trial data (active, N=37; sham, N=33) were used to assess relationships between PLSC-derived symptom profiles and treatment outcomes., Results: PLSC identified three latent variables (LVs) relating functional brain circuitry with symptom profiles. LV1 related a general depressive symptom factor with positive associations between and within the default mode network (DMN), the frontoparietal network (FPN), and the cingulo-opercular network (CON). LV2 related negative symptoms (no depressive symptoms) via negative associations, especially between the FPN and the CON, but also between the DMN and the FPN and the CON. LV3 related a guilt and early wakening depression factor via negative rather than positive associations with the DMN, FPN, and CON. The secondary visual network had a positive association with general depressive symptoms and negative associations with guilt and negative symptoms. Active (but not sham) rTMS applied bilaterally to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) reduced general depressive but not guilt-related or negative symptoms., Conclusions: The results clearly differentiate the neural circuitry underlying depressive and negative symptoms, and segregated across the two-factor structure of depression in SSDs. These findings support divergent neurobiological pathways of depressive symptoms and negative symptoms in people with SSDs. As treatment options are currently limited, bilateral rTMS to the DLPFC is worth exploring further for general depressive symptoms in people with SSDs.

Background/Objectives : Schizophrenia (SZ) is a severe psychiatric disorder characterized by a complex interplay of genetic, developmental, and environmental factors that significantly increase the risk of suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempts (SAs). This systematic review synthesizes current research on the developmental predictors of SI in individuals with SZ, aiming to delineate the multifactorial etiology of suicide within this population. Methods : A comprehensive search across Medline, PsycINFO, and EMBASE databases identified 23 eligible studies, emphasizing the varied methodological approaches and the global distribution of research efforts. Results : These studies demonstrate a robust association between early life adversities, particularly childhood trauma such as physical neglect, emotional abuse, and sexual abuse, and the increased prevalence of SI and SAs in SZ. This review also highlights the significant genetic factors associated with the development of suicidality in SZ, raising the possibility that polymorphisms in inflammation-related genes and neurodevelopmental abnormalities may influence susceptibility to SI. Notably, family history of psychiatric conditions may exacerbate the risk of SI through both hereditary and environmental mechanisms. Environmental factors, including socioeconomic status and social support, are also implicated, underscoring the role of broader socio-environmental conditions influencing outcomes. Conclusions : This review supports the integration of biopsychosocial models in understanding SI in SZ, advocating for interventions addressing the complex interplay of risk factors and the need for longitudinal studies to elucidate the dynamic interactions between risk factors over time. This comprehensive understanding is crucial for developing targeted preventive strategies and enhancing the clinical management of SZ, aiming to reduce suicidality in this vulnerable population.

Understanding how spontaneous brain activity influences the response to neurostimulation is crucial for the development of neurotherapeutics and brain-computer interfaces. Localized brain activity is suggested to influence the response to neurostimulation, but whether fast-fluctuating (i.e., tens of milliseconds) large-scale brain dynamics also have any such influence is unknown. By stimulating the prefrontal cortex using combined transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography, we examined how dynamic global brain state patterns, as defined by microstates, influence the magnitude of the evoked brain response. TMS applied during what resembled the canonical Microstate C was found to induce a greater evoked response for up to 80 ms compared with other microstates. This effect was found in a repeated experimental session, was absent during sham stimulation, and was replicated in an independent dataset. Ultimately, ongoing and fast-fluctuating global brain states, as probed by microstates, may be associated with intrinsic fluctuations in connectivity and excitation-inhibition balance and influence the neurostimulation outcome. We suggest that the fast-fluctuating global brain states be considered when developing any related paradigms., Competing Interests: D.M.B. has received in-kind equipment support for investigator-initiated studies from MagVenture; he has received research support and in-kind equipment support for an investigator-initiated study from BrainsWay and is the site principal investigator for three sponsor-initiated studies for BrainsWay; he has received medication supplies for an investigator-initiated trial from Indivior; and he has participated on an advisory board for Janssen. Z.J.D. has received research and equipment in-kind support for an investigator-initiated study through BrainsWay and MagVenture. A.K., P.D., M.D.G., S.M., and F.F. report no biomedical financial interests or potential competing financial interests., (Copyright © 2024 the authors.)

Background: Recent studies have reported significant advances in modeling the biological basis of heterogeneity in major depressive disorder, but investigators have also identified important technical challenges, including scanner-related artifacts, a propensity for multivariate models to overfit, and a need for larger samples with more extensive clinical phenotyping. The goals of the current study were to evaluate dimensional and categorical solutions to parsing heterogeneity in depression that are stable and generalizable in a large, single-site sample., Methods: We used regularized canonical correlation analysis to identify data-driven brain-behavior dimensions that explain individual differences in depression symptom domains in a large, single-site dataset comprising clinical assessments and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data for 328 patients with major depressive disorder and 461 healthy control participants. We examined the stability of clinical loadings and model performance in held-out data. Finally, hierarchical clustering on these dimensions was used to identify categorical depression subtypes., Results: The optimal regularized canonical correlation analysis model yielded 3 robust and generalizable brain-behavior dimensions that explained individual differences in depressed mood and anxiety, anhedonia, and insomnia. Hierarchical clustering identified 4 depression subtypes, each with distinct clinical symptom profiles, abnormal resting-state functional connectivity patterns, and antidepressant responsiveness to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation., Conclusions: Our results define dimensional and categorical solutions to parsing neurobiological heterogeneity in major depressive disorder that are stable, generalizable, and capable of predicting treatment outcomes, each with distinct advantages in different contexts. They also provide additional evidence that regularized canonical correlation analysis and hierarchical clustering are effective tools for investigating associations between functional connectivity and clinical symptoms., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Decades of neuroimaging studies have shown modest differences in brain structure and connectivity in depression, hindering mechanistic insights or the identification of risk factors for disease onset 1 . Furthermore, whereas depression is episodic, few longitudinal neuroimaging studies exist, limiting understanding of mechanisms that drive mood-state transitions. The emerging field of precision functional mapping has used densely sampled longitudinal neuroimaging data to show behaviourally meaningful differences in brain network topography and connectivity between and in healthy individuals 2-4 , but this approach has not been applied in depression. Here, using precision functional mapping and several samples of deeply sampled individuals, we found that the frontostriatal salience network is expanded nearly twofold in the cortex of most individuals with depression. This effect was replicable in several samples and caused primarily by network border shifts, with three distinct modes of encroachment occurring in different individuals. Salience network expansion was stable over time, unaffected by mood state and detectable in children before the onset of depression later in adolescence. Longitudinal analyses of individuals scanned up to 62 times over 1.5 years identified connectivity changes in frontostriatal circuits that tracked fluctuations in specific symptoms and predicted future anhedonia symptoms. Together, these findings identify a trait-like brain network topology that may confer risk for depression and mood-state-dependent connectivity changes in frontostriatal circuits that predict the emergence and remission of depressive symptoms over time., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Large-scale networks underpin brain functions. How such networks respond to focal stimulation can help decipher complex brain processes and optimize brain stimulation treatments. To map such stimulation-response patterns across the brain non-invasively, we recorded concurrent EEG responses from single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (i.e., TMS-EEG) from over 100 cortical regions with two orthogonal coil orientations from one densely-sampled individual. We also acquired Human Connectome Project (HCP)-styled diffusion imaging scans (six), resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) scans (120 mins), resting-state EEG scans (108 mins), and structural MR scans (T1- and T2-weighted). Using the TMS-EEG data, we applied network science-based community detection to reveal insights about the brain's causal-functional organization from both a stimulation and recording perspective. We also computed structural and functional maps and the electric field of each TMS stimulation condition. Altogether, we hope the release of this densely sampled (n=1) dataset will be a uniquely valuable resource for both basic and clinical neuroscience research.

Background: Applying deep brain stimulation (DBS) to several brain regions has been investigated in attempts to treat highly treatment-resistant depression, with variable results. Our initial pilot data suggested that the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) could be a promising therapeutic target., Objective: The aim of this study was to gather blinded data exploring the efficacy of applying DBS to the BNST in patients with highly refractory depression., Method: Eight patients with chronic severe treatment-resistant depression underwent DBS to the BNST. A randomised, double-blind crossover study design with fixed stimulation parameters was followed and followed by a period of open-label stimulation., Results: During the double-blind crossover phase, no consistent antidepressant effects were seen with any of the four stimulation parameters applied, and no patients achieved response or remission criteria during the blinded crossover phase or during a subsequent period of three months of blinded stimulation. Stimulation-related side effects, especially agitation, were reported by a number of patients and were reversible with adjustment of the stimulation parameters., Conclusions: The results of this study do not support the application of DBS to the BNST in patients with highly resistant depression or ongoing research utilising stimulation at this brain site. The blocked randomised study design utilising fixed stimulation parameters was poorly tolerated by the participants and does not appear suitable for assessing the efficacy of DBS at this location.

Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD), but substantial heterogeneity in outcomes remains. We examined a potential mechanism of action of rTMS to normalize individual variability in resting-state functional connectivity (rs-fc) before and after a course of treatment., Methods: Variability in rs-fc was examined in healthy controls (baseline) and individuals with MDD (baseline and after 4-6 weeks of rTMS). Seed-based connectivity was calculated to 4 regions associated with MDD: left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), right subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC), bilateral insula, and bilateral precuneus. Individual variability was quantified for each region by calculating the mean correlational distance of connectivity maps relative to the healthy controls; a higher variability score indicated a more atypical/idiosyncratic connectivity pattern., Results: We included data from 66 healthy controls and 252 individuals with MDD in our analyses. Patients with MDD did not show significant differences in baseline variability of rs-fc compared with controls. Treatment with rTMS increased rs-fc variability from the right sgACC and precuneus, but the increased variability was not associated with clinical outcomes. Interestingly, higher baseline variability of the right sgACC was significantly associated with less clinical improvement ( p = 0.037, uncorrected; did not survive false discovery rate correction). Limitations: The linear model was constructed separately for each region of interest., Conclusion: This was, to our knowledge, the first study to examine individual variability of rs-fc related to rTMS in individuals with MDD. In contrast to our hypotheses, we found that rTMS increased the individual variability of rs-fc. Our results suggest that individual variability of the right sgACC and bilateral precuneus connectivity may be a potential mechanism of rTMS., Competing Interests: Competing interests:: J. Downar declared grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Brain Canada, and the Ontario Brain Institute. He also declared consulting fees from TMS Neuro Solutions and Arc Health Partners. He is the co-founder and holds equity in Ampa Health. S. Nestor declared a research project award application to the Labatt Family Network for Research on the Biology of Depression, Labatt Family Discovery Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto. F. Vila-Rodriguez declared support from Seedlings Foundation, CIHR, and Brain Canada. He is a volunteer director with the BC Schizophrenia Society board of directors, and he has received in-kind equipment support from Magventure for investigator-initiated research. Z.J. Daskalakis serves on the advisory board of Brainsway Inc. He also declared receipt of research grant materials from Magventure Inc. and Brainsway Inc. D.M. blumberger declared grants from CIHR, Brain Canada, NIH, and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. He is a paid scientific advisory board member of Sooma, and serves as co-chair of the clinical standards committee (unpaid) of the Clinical TMS Society. He has stock options from Sooma and has received in-kind equipment support from Magventure Inc. and Brainsway Inc. for investigator-initiated studies. C. Hawco declared funding from the National Institute of Mental Health, CIHR and Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Foundation paid to his institution. No other competing interests were declared., (© 2024 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.)

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective treatment in patients with depression, yet treatment response remains variable. While previous work has identified predictors of remission in younger adults, relatively little data exists in late-life depression (LLD). To address this gap, data from 164 participants with LLD from a randomized non-inferiority treatment trial comparing standard bilateral rTMS to bilateral theta burst stimulation (TBS) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02998580) were analyzed using binary logistic regression and conditional inference tree (CIT) modeling. Lower baseline depression symptom severity, fewer prior antidepressant treatment failures, and higher global cognition predicted remission following rTMS treatment. The CIT predicted a higher likelihood of achieving remission for patients with a total score of 19 or lower on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, 1 or fewer prior antidepressant treatment failures, and a total score of 23 or higher on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Our results indicate that older adults with lower severity of depression, fewer antidepressant treatment failures, and higher global cognition benefit more from current forms of rTMS. The results suggest that there is potentially higher value in using rTMS earlier in the treatment pathway for depression in older adults., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest KG, APT and CM declare no conflict of interest. LM has received research funding from the Alzheimer's Society of Canada, Centre for Aging and Brain Health Innovation, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, and Brainsway, Ltd. TKR has received research support from Brain Canada, Brain and Behavior Research Foundation, BrightFocus Foundation, CAMH Foundation, Canada Foundation for Innovation, Canada Research Chair, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Centre for Aging and Brain Health Innovation, National Institutes of Health, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, and the Weston Brain Institute. TKR also received in-kind equipment support for an investigator-initiated study from Magstim, and in-kind research accounts from Scientific Brain Training Pro. ZJD has received research and equipment in-kind support for an investigator-initiated study through Brainsway Inc and Magventure Inc. He also currently serves on the scientific advisory board for Brainsway Inc. His-work has been supported by the National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Brain Canada and the Temerty Family, Grant and Kreutzcamp Family Foundations. JD has received research support from NIH, CIHR, Brain Canada, Ontario Brain Institute, the Klarman Family Foundation, the Arrell Family Foundation, and the Buchan Family Foundation, in-kind equipment support for investigator-initiated trials from MagVenture, is an advisor for BrainCheck, Arc Health Partners and Salience Neuro Health, and is a co-founder of Ampa Health. SMM reports research support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) / National Institute of Mental Health and the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation. He is a consultant for Pearson, Inc. He receives royalties from Guilford Press, Inc. SMN reports research and salary support from the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Foundation, Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation; research support from the Brain and Behaviour Research Foundation Young Investigator Grant, Labatt Family Network Discovery Program and the Donald T Stuss Young Investigator Research Innovation Award. YN has received a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (21H02813) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; research grants from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development; investigator-initiated clinical study grants from Teijin Pharma and Inter Reha Co; research grants from the Watanabe Foundation and Daiichi Sankyo Scholarship Donation Program; speaker's honoraria from Sumitomo Pharma Co, Teijin Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co, Lundbeck Japan Co, and Viatris within the past 3 years outside the submitted work; and in-kind equipment support for investigator-initiated studies from Magventure, Inter Reha Co, and Miyuki Giken Co. BHM belongs to the following Boards: Member, Board of Trustees, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario. Current potential conflicts (and past five years: January 2018 -present): support from Brain Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the CAMH Foundation, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), the US National Institute of Health (NIH), Capital Solution Design LLC (software used in a study founded by CAMH Foundation), and HAPPYneuron (software used in a study founded by Brain Canada). DMB has received research support from CIHR, NIH, Brain Canada and the Temerty Family through the CAMH Foundation and the Campbell Family Research Institute. He received research support and in-kind equipment support for an investigator-initiated study from Brainsway Ltd. He is the site principal investigator for three sponsor-initiated studies for Brainsway Ltd. He also receives in-kind equipment support from Magventure for two investigator-initiated studies. He received medication supplies for an investigator-initiated trial from Indivior., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In recent years, there has been debate about the effectiveness of treatments from different fields, such as neurostimulation, neurofeedback, brain training, and pharmacotherapy. This debate has been fuelled by contradictory and nuanced experimental findings. Notably, the effectiveness of a given treatment is commonly evaluated by comparing the effect of the active treatment versus the placebo on human health and/or behaviour. However, this approach neglects the individual's subjective experience of the type of treatment she or he received in establishing treatment efficacy. Here, we show that individual differences in subjective treatment - the thought of receiving the active or placebo condition during an experiment - can explain variability in outcomes better than the actual treatment. We analysed four independent datasets (N = 387 participants), including clinical patients and healthy adults from different age groups who were exposed to different neurostimulation treatments (transcranial magnetic stimulation: Studies 1 and 2; transcranial direct current stimulation: Studies 3 and 4). Our findings show that the inclusion of subjective treatment can provide a better model fit either alone or in interaction with objective treatment (defined as the condition to which participants are assigned in the experiment). These results demonstrate the significant contribution of subjective experience in explaining the variability of clinical, cognitive, and behavioural outcomes. We advocate for existing and future studies in clinical and non-clinical research to start accounting for participants' subjective beliefs and their interplay with objective treatment when assessing the efficacy of treatments. This approach will be crucial in providing a more accurate estimation of the treatment effect and its source, allowing the development of effective and reproducible interventions., Competing Interests: LF, SH, ZD, DB, RC No competing interests declared, (© 2023, Fassi, Hochman et al.)

Whether individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and a history of major depressive disorder (MDD) are at a higher risk for cognitive decline than those with MCI alone is still not clear. Previous work suggests that a reduction in prefrontal cortical theta phase-gamma amplitude coupling (TGC) is an early marker of cognitive impairment. This study aimed to determine whether using a TGC cutoff is better at separating individuals with MCI or MCI with remitted MDD (MCI+rMDD) on cognitive performance than their clinical diagnosis. Our hypothesis was that global cognition would differ more between TGC-based groups than diagnostic groups. We analyzed data from 128 MCI (mean age: 71.8, SD: 7.3) and 85 MCI+rMDD (mean age: 70.9, SD: 4.7) participants. Participants completed a comprehensive neuropsychological battery; TGC was measured during the N-back task. An optimal TGC cutoff was determined during the performance of the 2-back. This TGC cutoff was used to classify participants into low vs. high-TGC groups. We then compared Cohen's d of the difference in global cognition between the high and low TGC groups to Cohen's d between the MCI and MCI+rMDD groups. We used bootstrapping to determine 95% confidence intervals for Cohen's d values using the whole sample. As hypothesized, Cohen's d for the difference in global cognition between the TGC groups was larger (0.64 [0.32, 0.88]) than between the diagnostic groups (0.10 [0.004, 0.37]) with a difference between these two Cohen's d's of 0.54 [0.10, 0.80]. Our findings suggest that TGC is a useful marker to identify individuals at high risk for cognitive decline, beyond clinical diagnosis. This could be due to TGC being a sensitive marker of prefrontal cortical dysfunction that would lead to an accelerated cognitive decline., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Over the past two decades noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have emerged as powerful therapeutic options for a range of psychiatric and neurological disorders. NIBS are hypothesized to rebalance pathological brain networks thus reducing symptoms and improving functioning. This development has been fueled by controlled studies with increasing size and rigor aiming to characterize how treatments induce clinically effective change. Clinical trials of NIBS for specific indications have resulted in federal approval for unipolar depression, bipolar depression, smoking cessation, and obsessive-compulsive disorder in the United States, and several other indications worldwide. As a rapidly emerging field, there are numerous pre-clinical indications currently in development using a variety of electrical and magnetic, non-convulsive, and convulsive approaches. This review discusses the state-of-the-science surrounding promising avenues of NIBS currently in pre-approval stages for non-affective psychiatric disorders. We consider emerging therapies for psychosis, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and borderline personality disorder, utilizing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and magnetic seizure therapy (MST), with an additional brief section for early-stage techniques including transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (tFUS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). As revealed in this review, there is considerable promise across all four psychiatric indications with different NIBS approaches. Positive findings are notable for the treatment of psychosis using tDCS, MST, and rTMS. While rTMS is already FDA approved for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder, methodologies such as tDCS also demonstrate potential in this condition. Emerging techniques show promise for treating non-affective disorders likely leading to future regulatory approvals., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: The magnitude of the placebo response depends on both the modality used as the "placebo" and the intervention with which it is compared, both of which can complicate the interpretation of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for depression in late life. Given that neurostimulation and pharmacotherapy are among the most common interventions studied for late-life depression, comparing the relative placebo responses in studies of these interventions can aid interpretation of relative effect sizes., Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from two RCTs of adults aged ≥60 years in an episode of treatment-resistant major depression, one comparing aripiprazole and matching placebo pills and the other comparing deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and sham rTMS. In both RCTs, depression was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17). The primary comparison occurred after four weeks using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) of HDRS-17 scores in participants who received placebo pills or sham rTMS. Relevant covariates included years of education, duration of depressive episode, and baseline HDRS-17 score., Results: Accounting for covariates, there was a larger reduction of HDRS-17 after four weeks in the sham rTMS group (estimated marginal mean ± SE: -5.90 ± 1.45; 95% CI: [-8.82, 2.98]) than in the placebo pills group (-1.07 ± 1.45; [-3.98, 1.85]). There were no significant differences between these groups in the binary outcome analysis of response and remission rates at four weeks or any outcome at trial end point comparison., Conclusions: Sham rTMS may have a larger placebo response than placebo pills early in the treatment of older adults with treatment-resistant depression. Differential placebo responses should be considered in both the interpretation and design of RCTs., (Copyright © 2021 International Neuromodulation Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. One of the most efficacious treatments for treatment-resistant MDD is electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Recently, magnetic seizure therapy (MST) was developed as an alternative to ECT due to its more favorable side effect profile. While these approaches have been very successful clinically, the neural mechanisms underlying their therapeutic effects are unknown. For example, clinical "slowing" of the electroencephalogram beginning in the postictal state and extending days to weeks post-treatment has been observed in both treatment modalities. However, a recent longitudinal study of a small cohort of ECT patients revealed that, rather than delta oscillations, clinical slowing was better explained by increases in aperiodic activity, an emerging EEG signal linked to neural inhibition. Here we investigate the role of aperiodic activity in a cohort of patients who received ECT and a cohort of patients who received MST treatment. We find that aperiodic neural activity increases significantly in patients receiving either ECT or MST. Although not directly related to clinical efficacy in this dataset, increased aperiodic activity is linked to greater amounts of neural inhibition, which is suggestive of a potential shared neural mechanism of action across ECT and MST., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Theta burst stimulation (TBS), a specific form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is a promising treatment for youth with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) who do not respond to conventional therapies. However, given the variable response to TBS, a greater understanding of how baseline features relate to clinical response is needed to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from this treatment. In the current study, we sought to determine if baseline neurophysiology, specifically cortical excitation and/or inhibition, is associated with antidepressant response to TBS. In two independent open-label clinical trials, youth (aged 16-24 years old) with MDD underwent bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) TBS treatment. Clinical trial one and two consisted of 10 and 20 daily sessions of bilateral DLPFC TBS, respectively. At baseline, single-pulse TMS combined with electroencephalography was used to assess the neurophysiology of 4 cortical sites: bilateral DLPFC and inferior parietal lobule. Measures of cortical excitation and inhibition were indexed by TMS-evoked potentials (i.e., P30, N45, P60, N100, and P200). Depression severity was measured before, during and after treatment completion using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17. In both clinical trials, the baseline left DLPFC N45 and P60, which are believed to reflect inhibitory and excitatory mechanisms respectively, were predictors of clinical response. Specifically, greater (i.e., more negative) N45 and smaller P60 baseline values were associated with greater treatment response to TBS. Accordingly, cortical excitation and inhibition circuitry of the left DLPFC may have value as a TBS treatment response biomarker for youth with MDD.Clinical trial 1 registration number: NCT02472470 (June 15, 2015).Clinical trial 2 registration number: NCT03708172 (October 17, 2018)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can offer therapeutic benefits and provide value in neurophysiological research. One of the newer TMS paradigms is theta burst stimulation (TBS) which can be delivered in two patterns: continuous (cTBS - inducing LTD-like effects) and intermittent (iTBS - inducing LTP-like effects). This review paper aims to explore studies that have utilized TBS protocols over different areas of the cortex to study the neurophysiological functions and treatment of patients with schizophrenia. PubMed was searched using the following keywords "schizophrenia", "schizoaffective", or "psychosis", and "theta burst stimulation". Out of the 90 articles which were found, thirty met review inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria included studying the reported effect (clinical, physiological, or both) of at least one session of TBS on human subjects, and abstracts (at minimum) must have been in English. The main target areas included prefrontal cortex (12 studies - 10 dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), 2 dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC)) vermal cerebellum (5), and temporo-parietal cortex (8). Other target areas included inferior parietal lobe (2), and motor cortex (3). TBS neurophysiological effect was explored in 5 studies using functional magnetic resonance image (fMRI), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG) and positron emission topography (PET) scan. Overall, TBS can offer great therapeutic potential as it is well-tolerated, feasible, and has few, if any, adverse effects. TBS may be targeted to treat specific symptomatology, as an augmenting intervention to pharmacotherapy, or even improving patient's insight into their diagnosis., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest DMB receives research support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), National Institutes of Health – US (NIH), Brain Canada Foundation and the Temerty Family through the CAMH Foundation and the Campbell Family Research Institute. He received research support and in-kind equipment support for an investigator-initiated study from Brainsway Ltd. and he was the site principal investigator for three sponsor-initiated studies for Brainsway Ltd. He received in-kind equipment support from Magventure for investigator-initiated studies. He received medication supplies for an investigator-initiated trial from Indivior. He has participated in an advisory board for Janssen. He has participated in an advisory board for Welcony Inc. ZJD has received research and equipment in-kind support for an investigator-initiated study through Brainsway Inc. and Magventure Inc. and industry-initiated trials through Magnus Inc. He also currently serves on the scientific advisory board for Brainsway Inc. His work has been supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Brain Canada and the Temerty Family, Grant and Kreutzcamp Family Foundations. DV holds the Labatt Family Professorship in Depression Biology, a University Named Professorship at the University of Toronto. She receives research support from CIHR, the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), The Centre for Mental Health at University Health Network and the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Toronto. DV declares no biomedical interests or conflicts. Dr. Rajji has received research support from Brain Canada, Brain and Behavior Research Foundation, BrightFocus Foundation, Canada Foundation for Innovation, Canada Research Chair, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Centre for Aging and Brain Health Innovation, National Institutes of Health, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, and the Weston Brain Institute. Dr. Rajji also received for an investigator-initiated study in-kind equipment support from Newronika, and in-kind research online accounts from Scientific Brain Training Pro, and participated in 2021 and 2022 in an advisory activity for Biogen Canada Inc. Dr. Rajji is also an inventor on the United States Provisional Patent No. 17/396,030 that describes cell-based assays and kits for assessing serum cholinergic receptor activity. MP, RZ, and KG do not have any conflict of interest to report., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used for treatment of late-life depression. In the FOUR-D study, sequential bilateral theta-burst stimulation (TBS) had comparable remission rates to standard bilateral rTMS. Data were analysed from the FOUR-D trial to compare remission rates between two types of rTMS based on the number and class of prior medication trials. The remission rate was higher in participants with ≤1 previous trial (43.9%) than in participants with 2 previous trials (26.5%) or ≥3 previous trials (24.6%; χ² = 6.36, d.f. = 2, P = 0.04). Utilising rTMS earlier in late-life depression may lead to better outcomes.

Introduction: Guidance on Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) treatment in those with comorbid Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is limited. We performed a secondary analysis on the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study, examining the association between comorbid AUD and depression outcomes., Methods: STAR*D was a real-world effectiveness trial starting with citalopram in level 1. Non-responding participants progressed through 3 other sequential treatment levels with different switch or augmentation options. Antidepressant outcomes were compared between MDD (n = 2826) and comorbid MDD and AUD (n = 864). Logistic regressions were performed to evaluate remission and response predictors in the total STAR*D sample and the AUD-comorbidity interaction., Results: Chi-squared tests showed no significant difference in response or remission rates from depression between groups across treatment levels. Higher Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score was associated with overall lower odds of remission in treatment level 1 (OR = 0.93, p < 0.001) and 2 (OR = 0.95, p < 0.001), with no significant interaction with comorbid AUD. Higher baseline suicidality had overall lower odds of remission in level 1 (OR = 0.82, p < 0.001) and 2 (OR = 0.1, p < 0.001), but with comorbid AUD compared to no AUD, suicidality increased odds of level 1 remission (OR = 1.30, p = 0.012). In comorbid AUD in level 2, venlafaxine was associated with lower odds of remission (OR = 0.13, p = 0.013) and response (OR = 0.12, p = 0.006); bupropion with lower odds of response (OR = 0.22, p = 0.024)., Limitations: Open label study design and lack of alcohol use data., Conclusions: Comorbid AUD may interact with predictors of antidepressant response in MDD and using venlafaxine or bupropion may be less effective. Addressing this comorbidity requires unique assessment and treatment approaches., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest VMT has received research support from the Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation, the Labatt Family Network for Research on the Biology of Depression, and the CAMH Discovery Fund. DY has received research grants from the University of Texas at Arlington. CRW has received research funding from the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation and consulting fees from GoodCap Pharmaceuticals Inc. BDMJ, GW, and BLF have none declared. MES receives research funding through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, and the Canadian Cancer Society. DMB has received grants or contracts from Brainsway and MagVenture and payment or honoraria from Welcony Inc. ZJD has received grants from the National Institutes of Mental Health, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and Brainsaway Inc. He is on the scientific advisory board of Brainsway Inc. and Gazebo Health Inc. He has received equipment and materials from Brainsway Inc. and MagVenture Inc. DV received research support from CIHR, the Temerty Centre and through the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, and holds the Labatt Family Professorship in Depression Biology, a University Named Professorship at the University of Toronto., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent mental health condition affecting millions worldwide, leading to disability and reduced quality of life. MDD poses a global health priority due to its early onset and association with other disabling conditions. Available treatments for MDD exhibit varying effectiveness, and a substantial portion of individuals remain resistant to treatment. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), applied to the left and/or right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), is an alternative treatment strategy for those experiencing treatment-resistant MDD. The objective of this study is to investigate whether this newer form of rTMS, namely theta burst stimulation (TBS), when performed unilaterally or bilaterally, is efficacious in treatment-resistant MDD., Methods: In this naturalistic, randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial, participants with a major depressive episode will be randomized to receive either unilateral (i.e., continuous TBS [cTBS] to the right and sham TBS to the left DLPFC) or bilateral sequential TBS (i.e., cTBS to the right and intermittent TBS [iTBS] to the left DLPFC) delivered 5 days a week for 4-6 weeks. Responders will move onto a 6-month flexible maintenance phase where TBS treatment will be delivered at a decreasing frequency depending on degree of symptom mitigation. Several clinical assessments and neuroimaging and neurophysiological biomarkers will be collected to investigate treatment response and potential associated biomarkers. A non-inferiority analysis will investigate whether bilateral sequential TBS is non-inferior to unilateral TBS and regression analyses will investigate biomarkers of treatment response. We expect to recruit a maximal of 256 participants. This trial is approved by the Research Ethics Board of The Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research (REB# 2,019,071) and will follow the Declaration of Helsinki. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals., Discussion: Comprehensive assessment of symptoms and neurophysiological biomarkers will contribute to understanding the differential efficacy of the tested treatment protocols, identifying biomarkers for treatment response, and shedding light into underlying mechanisms of TBS. Our findings will inform future clinical trials and aid in personalizing treatment selection and scheduling for individuals with MDD., Trial Registration: The trial is registered on https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/home (#NCT04142996)., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is effective for treatment-resistant depression, but the effects of iTBS on neurophysiological markers remain unclear. Here, we indexed transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) markers, specifically, the N45 and N100 amplitudes, at baseline and post-iTBS, comparing separated and contiguous iTBS schedules. TMS-EEG markers were also compared between iTBS responders and nonresponders., Methods: TMS-EEG was analyzed from a triple-blind 1:1 randomized trial for treatment-resistant depression, comparing a separated (54-minute interval) and contiguous (0-minute interval) schedule of 2 × 600-pulse iTBS for 30 treatments. Participants underwent TMS-EEG over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at baseline and posttreatment. One hundred fourteen participants had usable TMS-EEG at baseline, and 98 at posttreatment. TMS-evoked potential components (N45, N100) were examined via global mean field analysis., Results: The N100 amplitude decreased from baseline to posttreatment, regardless of the treatment group (F 1,106  = 5.20, p = .02). There were no changes in N45 amplitude in either treatment group. In responders, the N100 amplitude decreased after iTBS (F 1,102  = 11.30, p = .001, p corrected  = .0004). Responders showed higher posttreatment N45 amplitude than nonresponders (F 1,94  = 4.11, p = .045, p corrected  = .016). Higher baseline N100 amplitude predicted lower post-iTBS depression scores (F 4,106  = 6.28, p = .00014)., Conclusions: These results provide further evidence for an association between the neurophysiological effects of iTBS and treatment efficacy in treatment-resistant depression. Future studies are needed to test the predictive potential for clinical applications of TMS-EEG markers., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Current smoking cessation treatments are limited in terms of efficacy, particularly with regards to long term abstinence. There is a large amount of evidence implicating the insula in nicotine addiction., Objective: To examine the efficacy of bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) directed to the insular cortex with the H11 coil, relative to sham stimulation, on smoking abstinence and smoking outcomes in smokers who are receiving standard varenicline treatment., Methods: This randomized, double-blind, sham controlled trial recruited 42 participants who were randomized to receive either active (n = 24) or sham (n = 18) high frequency rTMS directed to the insula (4 weeks), while receiving varenicline treatment (12 weeks). The primary outcome was 7-day point prevalence abstinence at the end of 12 weeks., Results: Smokers in the active group had significantly higher abstinence rates than those in the sham group (82.4% vs. 30.7%, p = 0.013) at the end of treatment (Week 12). Secondary outcome measures of abstinence rate at the end of rTMS treatment (Week 4), abstinence rate at 6 months, and smoking outcomes (e.g., craving, withdrawal) showed no significant differences between groups. No differences were found in adverse events reported between the groups., Conclusion: This study provides evidence of the potential benefit of having a combined treatment for smoking cessation using insula rTMS with the H11 coil and varenicline. Maintenance rTMS sessions and continuation of varenicline for those in abstinence may induce longer-term effects and should be considered in future studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest BLF has obtained funding from Pfizer Inc. (GRAND Awards, including salary support) for investigator-initiated projects. BLF has obtained funding from Indivior for a clinical trial sponsored by Indivior. BLF has in-kind donations of cannabis products from Aurora Cannabis Enterprises Inc. and study medication donations from Pfizer Inc. (varenicline for smoking cessation) and Bioprojet Pharma. He was also provided a coil for a Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study from Brainsway. BLF has obtained industry funding from Canopy Growth Corporation (through research grants handled by the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and the University of Toronto), Bioprojet Pharma, Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (ACS), Alkermes and Universal Ibogaine. Lastly, BLF has received in kind donations of nabiximols from GW Pharmaceuticals for past studies funded by CIHR and NIH. He has participated in a session of a National Advisory Board Meeting (Emerging Trends BUP-XR) for Indivior Canada and is part of Steering Board for a clinical trial for Indivior. He has been consultant for Shinogi. He is supported by CAMH, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, a clinician-scientist award from the department of Family and Community Medicine of the University of Toronto and a Chair in Addiction Psychiatry from the department of Psychiatry of University of Toronto. MSB has received funding from the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (Formerly NARSAD) and is a full-time employee at Otsuka Canada Pharmaceutical Inc. DMB receives research support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), National Institutes of Health – US (NIH), Brain Canada Foundation and the Temerty Family through the CAMH Foundation and the Campbell Family Research Institute. He received research support and in-kind equipment support for an investigator-initiated study from Brainsway Ltd. and he was the site principal investigator for three sponsor-initiated studies for Brainsway Ltd. He received in-kind equipment support from Magventure for investigator-initiated studies. He received medication supplies for an investigator-initiated trial from Indivior. He has participated in an advisory board for Janssen. He has participated in an advisory board for Welcony Inc. VMT receives research support through the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation, the Physician Services Incorporated Foundation, Research in Addiction Medicine Scholars (RAMS) Program (R25DA033211) from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and the Labatt Family Network for Research on the Biology of Depression. ZJD has received research and equipment in-kind support for an investigator-initiated study through Brainsway Inc and Magventure Inc and industry-initiated trials through Magnus Inc. He also currently serves on the scientific advisory board for Brainsway Inc. His work has been supported by the National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Brain Canada and the Temerty Family, Grant and Kreutzcamp Family Foundations. AZ is an inventor of Deep TMS coils and has financial interest in BrainsWay which produces and markets these coils. CI, SM, APT, RFT have no conflicts of interests to declare., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)