1. Evaluation of Cell-Free DNA Long Fragments in the Triage of FIT+ Patients Enrolled in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: An Italian Prospective, Cross-Sectional Study
- Author
-
Mauro Scimia, Francesco Pepe, Gianluca Russo, Umberto Malapelle, Simone Scimia, Annalaura Alfieri, Valentina Olivieri, Rachel Chuang, Hiromi Tanaka, Michael Sha, David Chen, Claudia Scimone, Lucia Palumbo, Shuo Shen, Yulia Gavrilov, Stav Edelstein, Maria Antonia Bianco, and Giancarlo Troncone
- Subjects
triage advanced adenoma patients ,molecular techniques ,liquid biopsy ,colorectal neoplasia ,Pathology ,RB1-214 - Abstract
Introduction: Colorectal cancer screening programs are effective in reducing incidence and mortality. In Europe, every FIT+ patient is referred to colonoscopy. The available data show that ~75.0% of these patients are negative. It is desirable to select patients at a greater risk of having a positive colonoscopy. Materials and Methods: 711 subjects, aged 50–74, attending the screening program of ASL-NA-3-SUD (Naples, Italy), were enrolled in a cross-sectional study to evaluate the performance of the QuantiDNA™ test and the non-inferiority of an alternative approach (AAP). This evaluation is based on FIT+ and QuantiDNA™+ patients referred to colonoscopy, compared to Standard of Care (SOC) colonoscopy following a FIT+ test alone. A non-inferiority margin (NIM) for colorectal neoplasia (CN) and advanced adenomas (AA) was set at −10% and at −3.8% for CRC. Results: The odds ratio was 1.76 (p-value = 0.009). The detection rate of AAP was 15.9% for colorectal neoplasia, 13.0% for advanced adenoma, and 3.0% for CRC. The risk difference between AAP and SOC was −5.07% (95% C.I. −9.23, −0.90) for colorectal neoplasia, −4.02% (95% C.I. −7.89, −0.16) for advanced adenomas, and −1.04% (95% C.I. −3.16, 1.07) for CRC. This data suggests that AAP is non-inferior to SOC for detecting CN, AA, and CRC. The expected decrease in colonoscopies is 33.4%. Conclusions: The QuantiDNA™ test is straightforward, non-invasive, and well-tolerated. Data from this study indicate that it is effective in the reduction of the need for colonoscopy examinations (−33.4%) and is non-inferior to SOC in the detection of significant colorectal lesions.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF