Search

Background: Breast conserving surgery (BCS) is typically followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) based on several landmark trials demonstrating improvements in disease control and survival. Since completion of these historical trials, the advent of molecular subtyping has revealed that breast cancer is not a single disease entity, but rather a class of cancers with differential risk profiles. We evaluated whether RT could be safely omitted following BCS for patients with the most favorable subtype as defined by the Prosigna PAM50 assay. Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective single-arm cohort study with IRB approval and an FDA investigational device exemption (IDE). Eligible patients were women 50 to 75 years of age (inclusive) who had undergone BCS revealing tumors ≤2cm in size, that were estrogen or progesterone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative, grade 1-2, node negative (N0), with negative excision margins (no ink on tumor). Intent to take endocrine therapy was required. Upon registration, tumors were submitted for central Prosigna testing and those with Risk of Recurrence (ROR) score ≤40 were deemed eligible for the investigational omission of RT. The primary endpoint was the 5-year locoregional recurrence rate (LRR). Anticipating a total of 345 RT-omitting patients to enroll over 3.5 years, the study was designed with 90% power to exclude a 5-year LRR of 5% using a one-sample exponential test with one-sided type I error of 0.025. Results: From 2016 to 2020, 671 patients were registered from 13 centers, inclusive of affiliated regional network sites. Of these, 382 patients had a ROR Score ≤40 and opted to forego RT, comprising the main intention-to-treat (ITT) study population. Median age was 65 years (range 50 to 75), and median tumor size was 0.9 cm (range 0.1 to 2.0 cm). At a median follow-up of 26.9 months, 12 events were observed: 4 patients had ipsilateral in-breast recurrences, 7 had contralateral breast cancers, and 1 developed an unrelated melanoma. There were no regional-nodal or distant recurrences. The 2-year cumulative rate of LRR was 0.3% (95% CI: 0 – 1.0%). Of the 4 ipsilateral breast recurrences, 2 were in the same quadrant as the original primary tumor. Conclusion: In this preliminary report of the PRECISION trial, patients 50-75 years of age undergoing BCS and endocrine therapy for pT1N0 HR+ HER2-negative breast cancer with ROR score ≤40 had exceedingly low rates of LRR in the absence of adjuvant RT at a median follow-up of 26.9 months. Additional follow-up is required to determine whether these favorable results are durable. Citation Format: Lior Z. Braunstein, Julia Wong, Deborah A. Dillon, Yu-Hui Chen, Paul Catalano, Oren Cahlon, Mahmoud B. El-Tamer, Rachel Jimenez, Atif Khan, Carmen Perez, Rinaa Punglia, Ron Shiloh, Laura Warren, David Wazer, Jean Wright, Elizabeth Buckley, Tari King, Simon Powell, Eric Winer, Jennifer Bellon. Preliminary report of the PRECISION Trial (Profiling Early Breast Cancer for Radiotherapy Omission): A Phase II Study of Breast-Conserving Surgery Without Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Favorable-Risk Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-12-02.

Recent data have been published supporting the application of ultrashort radiation therapy (RT) regimens for women with early stage breast cancer after breast conserving surgery. What has remained controversial is whether and how to apply accelerated whole breast irradiation (AWBI) or accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) approaches in these patients, as well as the consideration of intraoperative RT (IORT).We performed a systematic review of the literature searching for randomized and prospective data published evaluating ultrashort RT delivered in 5 days or less with APBI, AWBI, or IORT.We identified 2 randomized studies evaluating AWBI (n = 5,011 patients) with 5 to 10 year follow-up, which supported the use of ultrashort course AWBI compared with hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (WBI). We identified 7 randomized trials evaluating APBI (compared with WBI) in 5 days or less (n = 8528) with numerous (n = 55) prospective studies as well, with the data supporting short course APBI. Finally, we identified 2 randomized trials evaluating IORT; however, both trials demonstrated elevated rates of recurrence with IORT compared with WBI.The current body of data available for ultrashort adjuvant RT regimens delivered in 5 days or less after breast conserving surgery overwhelmingly support their utilization. Although data for both exist, APBI regimens have, by far, greater numbers of patients and longer follow-up compared with AWBI. Also, given increased rates of recurrence seen with IORT with long-term follow-up, this should not be considered a standard approach at this time.

In recent years, results with mature follow-up have been reported for several Phase III trials randomizing women to receive whole breast irradiation (WBI) versus varying modalities of partial breast irradiation (PBI). It is important to recognize that these methods vary in terms of volume of breast tissue treated, dose per fraction, and duration of therapy. As such, clinical and technical guidelines may vary among the various PBI techniques.Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in PBI performed an extensive literature review focusing on the highest quality data available for the numerous PBI options offered in the modern era. Data were evaluated for strength of evidence and published outcomes were assessed.The majority of women enrolled on randomized trials of WBI versus PBI have been age45 years with tumor size3 cm, negative margins, and negative lymph nodes. The panel also concluded that PBI can be offered to selected women with estrogen receptor negative and/or Her2 amplified breast cancer, as well as ductal carcinoma in situ, and should generally be avoided in women with extensive lymphovascular space invasion.This updated guideline summarizes published clinical trials of PBI methods. The panel also highlights the role of PBI for women facing special circumstances, such as history of cosmetic breast augmentation or prior breast irradiation, and discusses promising novel modalities that are currently under study, such as ultrashort and preoperative PBI. Updated consensus guidelines are also provided to inform patient selection for PBI and to characterize the strength of evidence to support varying PBI modalities.

Adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) represents a standard approach for most patients treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for early-stage breast cancer. The first-generation of adjuvant RT schedules delivered daily treatment to the whole breast over 5-7 weeks. Although efficacious, this presented patients with a protracted course of treatment, reducing compliance and quality of life. While hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (WBI) has become the standard, and part of the second-generation of RT regimens, it still requires 3-4 weeks. Concurrently, partial-breast irradiation (PBI) has also been explored as a technique to complete RT in a much shorter time period (1-3 weeks). There are now seven trials confirming the efficacy of this shorter treatment approach compared with standard WBI. In an effort to further reduce treatment duration, ultra-short WBI and PBI regimens have recently emerged as the third-generation of breast radiation schedules, allowing for the completion of treatment in 5 days or less. With respect to WBI, recent data from the FAST-Forward trial (which evaluated five fractions of WBI delivered in 1 week) demonstrated no difference in clinical outcomes at 5 years, with limited difference in toxicity, compared with hypofractionated 3-week WBI. Regarding PBI, published data on five-fraction regimens delivered in 2 weeks have also demonstrated comparable outcomes at 10 years, with reduced toxicities with long-term follow-up. This report will review additional ongoing studies evaluating even shorter courses of adjuvant RT treatment (one to five fractions), including single-fraction PBI or WBI.

Several randomized trials have been performed comparing partial breast irradiation (PBI) and whole breast irradiation (WBI) though controversy remains, including regarding differences by PBI technique. We performed a meta-analysis to compare results between WBI versus PBI and between PBI techniques.A systematic review was performed to identify modern randomized studies listed in MEDLINE from 2005 to 2020. PBI trials were divided into external beam radiation and brachytherapy techniques, with intraoperative radiation excluded. A Bayesian logistic regression model evaluated the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and acute and chronic toxicities. The primary outcome was IBTR at 5 years with WBI compared with PBI.A total of 9758 patients from 7 studies were included (4840-WBI, 4918-PBI). At 5 years, no statistically significant difference in the rate of IBTR was noted between PBI (1.8%, 95% HPD 0.68-3.2%) and WBI (1.7%, 95% HPD 0.92-2.4%). By PBI technique, the 5-year rate of IBTR rate for external beam was 1.7% and 2.2% for brachytherapy. Rates of grade 2 + acute toxicity were 7.1% with PBI versus 47.5% with WBI. For late toxicities, grade 2/3 rates were 0%/0% with PBI compared with 1.0%/0% with WBI.IBTR rates were similar between PBI and WBI with no significant differences noted by PBI technique; PBI had reduced acute toxicities compared to WBI. Because studies did not provide toxicity data in a consistent fashion, definitive conclusions cannot be made with additional data from randomized trials needed to compare toxicity profiles between PBI techniques.

Background: Radiation therapy (RT) following breast conserving surgery (BCS) is known to improve locoregional and distant control in women with invasive breast cancer; however, RT does pose significant cost and potential risk, including concern for cardiopulmonary toxicity and secondary malignancy. Randomized trials show that the omission of RT among older women with otherwise favorable-risk breast cancer does not affect overall survival (OS) at 10 years, and modestly increases the risk of local recurrence (LR). Nevertheless, there is little prospective support for RT omission in younger women. Moreover, risk stratification in the randomized prospective studies to date relies on limited methods with potentially low fidelity at distinguishing luminal subtypes. Enhanced molecular profiling techniques could better discern tumor biology and, in turn, more precisely assess risk. PAM-50 is an expression profile of 50 genes used to classify breast cancer intrinsic subtype with consequent prognostic implications. The goal of this study is to identify low-risk breast cancer patients with luminal A subtype who may feasibly omit RT from their therapeutic regimen. Methods: This is a phase II prospective cohort study (NCT02653755) designed to assess the safety of treatment de-escalation (omission of RT) in women with favorable-risk invasive breast cancer following BCS. Eligibility criteria include female patients with invasive breast cancer, age 50-75, with tumors less than or equal to 2cm, negative surgical margins, ER+ or PR+ and HER2- disease, grade 1 or 2, no lymph node involvement, and no plans for chemotherapy or biologic therapy, who are eligible for and willing to receive endocrine therapy. Tumor samples from eligible patients will undergo PAM-50 transcriptional profiling using the Nanostring Prosigna assay. A low Risk of Recurrence (ROR) score, corresponding to the luminal A subtype, will permit patients to forego radiotherapy should they so choose. The primary endpoint is 5-year risk of local or regional recurrence of invasive or in situ breast carcinoma within the ipsilateral breast or regional lymph nodes. Study enrollment began in May 2016. Citation Format: Mira A. Patel, Deborah A. Dillon, Giulia Digiovanni, Yu-Hui Chen, Paul Catalano, Carmen Perez, David Wazer, Jean Wright, Rachel Jimenez, Eric Winer, Julia Wong, Jennifer Bellon, Lior Z. Braunstein. PRECISION (Profiling early breast cancer for radiotherapy omission): A phase II study of breast-conserving surgery without adjuvant radiotherapy for favorable-risk breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT271.

Introduction Two randomized intraoperative radiation therapy trials for early-stage breast cancer were recently published. The ELIOT Trial used electrons (IOERT), and the TARGIT-A Trial Update used 50-kV X-rays (IORT). These studies were compared for similarities and differences. The results were analyzed and used to determine which patients might be suitable for single-dose treatment. Method The primary sources of data were the ELIOT Trial and TARGIT-A Trial, as well as a comprehensive analysis of the peer-reviewed literature of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using 50-kV X-rays or electrons. Studies published or presented prior to March 2014 were analyzed for efficacy, patient restrictions, complications, and outcome. Results With a median follow-up of 5.8 years, the 5-year recurrence rates for ELIOT versus external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) patients were 4.4 % and 0.4 %, respectively, p = .0001. A low-risk ELIOT group was identified with a 5-year recurrence rate of 1.5 %. With a median follow-up of 29 months, the 5-year recurrence rates for the TARGIT-A versus EBRT patients were 3.3 % and 1.3 %, respectively, p = .042. Conclusion With 5.8 years of median follow-up, IOERT appears to have a subset of low-risk women for whom IOERT is acceptable. With 29 months of median follow-up the results of IORT with 50-kV devices are promising, but longer follow-up data are required. At the current time, single-fraction IOERT or IORT patients should be treated under strict institutional protocols.

We analyzed our recent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) experience to determine the radiographic response of intracranial metastatic melanomas to SRS. Twelve patients with 21 intracranial melanoma metastases treated with SRS were evaluated. Fifteen (72%) metastases were hemispheric, 3 (14%) were cerebellar, and 3 (14%) were in the basal ganglion or thalamus. All lesions were 2.5 cm or less in maximum diameter. Eleven patients also had whole brain external beam radiotherapy. Mean SRS dosage was 1,800 cGy to the 85% isodose surface and median dose was 1,800 cGy to the 80% isodose surface (range 1,100–3,100 cGy at the 80–95% isodose surface). Overall, 12 (57%) lesions showed decrease or stabilization of tumor volume (i.e., local control), while 9 (43%) showed enlargement. Division of metastases into small (≤1.0 cm diameter) and large (>1.0 cm diameter) tumors showed that the small tumors were more likely to regress than the large tumors (chi-square test; P < 0.03). Only 1 of 9 (11%) large lesions regressed as opposed to 7 of 12 (58%) small lesions regressed with SRS. We conclude that SRS is suited for small melanoma brain metastases, but lesions between 1.0 and 2.5 cm in diameter, while still generally considered appropriate for SRS, may not be as responsive to SRS at currently employed dosages. Radiat. Oncol. Invest. 5:72–80, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

There is no clear consensus on what type of adjuvant therapy should be used for patients with pancreatic cancer. Chemoradiation is the favored treatment modality by many in the United States while gemcitabine based chemotherapy is favored in Europe. Both of these approaches have been shown by large prospective, randomized trials to improve disease free intervals and in some studies overall survival. This review is an update from the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium held in San Francisco, CA, USA. We present the summary of the findings from Abstracts #145 and #269 and discuss the potential impact on our clinical practice on this highly lethal cancer., JOP. Journal of the Pancreas, Vol 14, N° 2 (2013): March - p. 109-220