Search

Supplemental Figure 2. AMG 232 treatment causes p53 stabilization, and increased p21 and MDM2 proteins in p53 wild-type cells.

Supplemental Figure 3. Body weights of mice in xenograft efficacy studies

Supplemental Figure 1. AMG 232 chemical structure, and 3-D model of AMG 232 bound to MDM2 protein.

Supplementary Figure 1 from Context-Dependent Role of Angiopoietin-1 Inhibition in the Suppression of Angiogenesis and Tumor Growth: Implications for AMG 386, an Angiopoietin-1/2–Neutralizing Peptibody

Supplementary Figure 3 from Context-Dependent Role of Angiopoietin-1 Inhibition in the Suppression of Angiogenesis and Tumor Growth: Implications for AMG 386, an Angiopoietin-1/2–Neutralizing Peptibody

AMG 386 is an investigational first-in-class peptide-Fc fusion protein (peptibody) that inhibits angiogenesis by preventing the interaction of angiopoietin-1 (Ang1) and Ang2 with their receptor, Tie2. Although the therapeutic value of blocking Ang2 has been shown in several models of tumorigenesis and angiogenesis, the potential benefit of Ang1 antagonism is less clear. To investigate the consequences of Ang1 neutralization, we have developed potent and selective peptibodies that inhibit the interaction between Ang1 and its receptor, Tie2. Although selective Ang1 antagonism has no independent effect in models of angiogenesis-associated diseases (cancer and diabetic retinopathy), it induces ovarian atrophy in normal juvenile rats and inhibits ovarian follicular angiogenesis in a hormone-induced ovulation model. Surprisingly, the activity of Ang1 inhibitors seems to be unmasked in some disease models when combined with Ang2 inhibitors, even in the context of concurrent vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition. Dual inhibition of Ang1 and Ang2 using AMG 386 or a combination of Ang1- and Ang2-selective peptibodies cooperatively suppresses tumor xenograft growth and ovarian follicular angiogenesis; however, Ang1 inhibition fails to augment the suppressive effect of Ang2 inhibition on tumor endothelial cell proliferation, corneal angiogenesis, and oxygen-induced retinal angiogenesis. In no case was Ang1 inhibition shown to (a) confer superior activity to Ang2 inhibition or dual Ang1/2 inhibition or (b) antagonize the efficacy of Ang2 inhibition. These results imply that Ang1 plays a context-dependent role in promoting postnatal angiogenesis and that dual Ang1/2 inhibition is superior to selective Ang2 inhibition for suppression of angiogenesis in some postnatal settings. Mol Cancer Ther; 9(10); 2641–51. ©2010 AACR.

Supplementary Methods, Figure Legends, and References from Context-Dependent Role of Angiopoietin-1 Inhibition in the Suppression of Angiogenesis and Tumor Growth: Implications for AMG 386, an Angiopoietin-1/2–Neutralizing Peptibody

Supplementary Figure 2 from Context-Dependent Role of Angiopoietin-1 Inhibition in the Suppression of Angiogenesis and Tumor Growth: Implications for AMG 386, an Angiopoietin-1/2–Neutralizing Peptibody

Supplementary Figure 4 from Context-Dependent Role of Angiopoietin-1 Inhibition in the Suppression of Angiogenesis and Tumor Growth: Implications for AMG 386, an Angiopoietin-1/2–Neutralizing Peptibody

Purpose: Talimogene laherparepvec, a new oncolytic immunotherapy, has been recently approved for the treatment of melanoma. Using a murine version of the virus, we characterized local and systemic antitumor immune responses driving efficacy in murine syngeneic models. Experimental Design: The activity of talimogene laherparepvec was characterized against melanoma cell lines using an in vitro viability assay. Efficacy of OncoVEXmGM-CSF (talimogene laherparepvec with the mouse granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor transgene) alone or in combination with checkpoint blockade was characterized in A20 and CT-26 contralateral murine tumor models. CD8+ depletion, adoptive T-cell transfers, and Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot assays were used to study the mechanism of action (MOA) of systemic immune responses. Results: Treatment with OncoVEXmGM-CSF cured all injected A20 tumors and half of contralateral tumors. Viral presence was limited to injected tumors and was not responsible for systemic efficacy. A significant increase in T cells (CD3+/CD8+) was observed in injected and contralateral tumors at 168 hours. Ex vivo analyses showed these cytotoxic T lymphocytes were tumor-specific. Increased neutrophils, monocytes, and chemokines were observed in injected tumors only. Importantly, depletion of CD8+ T cells abolished all systemic efficacy and significantly decreased local efficacy. In addition, immune cell transfer from OncoVEXmGM-CSF-cured mice significantly protected from tumor challenge. Finally, combination of OncoVEXmGM-CSF and checkpoint blockade resulted in increased tumor-specific CD8+ anti-AH1 T cells and systemic efficacy. Conclusions: The data support a dual MOA for OncoVEXmGM-CSF that involves direct oncolysis of injected tumors and activation of a CD8+-dependent systemic response that clears injected and contralateral tumors when combined with checkpoint inhibition. Clin Cancer Res; 23(20); 6190–202. ©2017 AACR.

SUMMARY The diversity and heterogeneity within high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC), which is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy, is not well understood. Here, we perform comprehensive multi-platform omics analyses, including integrated analysis, and immune monitoring on primary and metastatic sites from highly clinically annotated HGSC samples based on a laparoscopic triage algorithm from patients who underwent complete gross resection (R0) or received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with excellent or poor response. We identify significant distinct molecular abnormalities and cellular changes and immune cell repertoire alterations between the groups, including a higher rate of NF1 copy number loss, and reduced chromothripsis-like patterns, higher levels of strong-binding neoantigens, and a higher number of infiltrated T cells in the R0 versus the NACT groups., Graphical Abstract, In Brief High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) patients with no gross residual disease (R0) after primary surgery have the greatest improvement in clinical outcomes. A deep understanding of molecular and cellular heterogeneity of HGSC is lacking. Findings by Lee et al. highlight major molecular and cellular differences between clinically defined subgroups of HGSC.

Sclerostin antibody (Scl-Ab) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) are bone-forming agents that have different modes of action on bone, although a study directly comparing their effects has not been conducted. The present study investigated the comparative quantitative effects of these two bone-forming agents over time on bone at the organ, tissue, and cellular level; specifically, at the level of the osteoblast (Ob) lineage in adolescent male and female rats. Briefly, eight-week old male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were administered either vehicle, Scl-Ab (3 or 50mg/kg/week subcutaneously), or human PTH (1-34) (75 μg/kg/day subcutaneously) for 4 or 26 weeks. The 50mg/kg Scl-Ab and the PTH dose were those used in the respective rat lifetime pharmacology studies. Using robust stereological methods, we compared the effects of these agents specifically at the level of the Ob lineage in vertebrae from female rats. Using RUNX2 or nestin immunostaining, location, and morphology, the total number of osteoprogenitor subpopulations, Ob, and lining cells were estimated using the fractionator or proportionator estimators. Density estimates were also calculated referent to total bone surface, total Ob surface, or total marrow volume. Scl-Ab generally effected greater increases in cancellous and cortical bone mass than PTH, correlating with higher bone formation rates (BFR) at 4 weeks in the spine and mid-femur without corresponding increases in bone resorption indices. The increases in vertebral BFR/BS at 4 weeks attenuated with continued treatment to a greater extent with Scl-Ab than with PTH. At 4 weeks, both Scl-Ab and PTH effected equivalent increases in total Ob number (Ob.N). Ob density on the formative surfaces (Ob.N/Ob.S) remained similar across groups while mineral apposition rate (MAR) was significantly higher with Scl-Ab at week 4, reflecting an increase in individual Ob vigor relative to vehicle and PTH. After 26 weeks, Scl-Ab maintained BFR/BS with fewer Ob and lower Ob.N/Ob.S by increasing the Ob footprint (bone surface area occupied by an Ob) and increasing MAR, compared with PTH. The lower Ob.N and Ob.N/Ob.S with Scl-Ab at 26 weeks were associated with decreased osteoprogenitor numbers compared with both vehicle and PTH, an effect not evident at week 4. Osteoprogenitor numbers were generally positively correlated with Ob.N across groups and timepoints, suggesting dynamic coordination between the progenitor and Ob populations. The time-dependent reductions in subpopulations of the Ob lineage with Scl-Ab may be integral to the greater attenuation or self-regulation of bone formation observed at the vertebra, as PTH required more Ob at the formative site with correlative increased numbers of progenitors compared with Scl-Ab indicating potentially greater stimulus for progenitor pool proliferation or differentiation.

AMG 386 is an investigational first-in-class peptide-Fc fusion protein (peptibody) that inhibits angiogenesis by preventing the interaction of angiopoietin-1 (Ang1) and Ang2 with their receptor, Tie2. Although the therapeutic value of blocking Ang2 has been shown in several models of tumorigenesis and angiogenesis, the potential benefit of Ang1 antagonism is less clear. To investigate the consequences of Ang1 neutralization, we have developed potent and selective peptibodies that inhibit the interaction between Ang1 and its receptor, Tie2. Although selective Ang1 antagonism has no independent effect in models of angiogenesis-associated diseases (cancer and diabetic retinopathy), it induces ovarian atrophy in normal juvenile rats and inhibits ovarian follicular angiogenesis in a hormone-induced ovulation model. Surprisingly, the activity of Ang1 inhibitors seems to be unmasked in some disease models when combined with Ang2 inhibitors, even in the context of concurrent vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition. Dual inhibition of Ang1 and Ang2 using AMG 386 or a combination of Ang1- and Ang2-selective peptibodies cooperatively suppresses tumor xenograft growth and ovarian follicular angiogenesis; however, Ang1 inhibition fails to augment the suppressive effect of Ang2 inhibition on tumor endothelial cell proliferation, corneal angiogenesis, and oxygen-induced retinal angiogenesis. In no case was Ang1 inhibition shown to (a) confer superior activity to Ang2 inhibition or dual Ang1/2 inhibition or (b) antagonize the efficacy of Ang2 inhibition. These results imply that Ang1 plays a context-dependent role in promoting postnatal angiogenesis and that dual Ang1/2 inhibition is superior to selective Ang2 inhibition for suppression of angiogenesis in some postnatal settings. Mol Cancer Ther; 9(10); 2641–51. ©2010 AACR.

AIM 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11beta-HSD1) is considered to contribute to the aetiology of the metabolic syndrome, and specific inhibitors have begun to emerge as treatments for insulin resistance and other facets of the syndrome, including atherosclerosis. Given the role of glucocorticoids and 11beta-HSD1 in the anti-inflammatory response and the involvement of inflammation in the development of atherosclerosis, 11beta-HSD1 inhibition may exacerbate atherosclerosis. Our aim was to investigate in vivo the effects of a specific 11beta-HSD1 inhibitor (2922) on atherosclerosis while assessing glucose homeostasis. METHODS We conducted a 12-week study administering 2922 (at three doses, 3, 10 and 100 mg/kg body weight) in Ldlr 3KO (Ldlr(-/-)Apob(100/100)Lep(ob/ob)) mice, a genetic model of obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia and atherosclerosis. Rosiglitazone and simvastatin were used to test the responsiveness of our model in both types of therapy. RESULTS 2922 was effective in reducing 11beta-HSD1 activity in inguinal adipose tissue (>90% for 100 mg/kg) and was efficacious in improving glucose homeostasis at doses > or =10 mg/kg. Plasma insulin, blood glucose, glucose tolerance and homeostatic model assessment indices were all improved in mice treated with 2922 (100 mg/kg) compared with control animals. Despite an improvement in these parameters, no differences were observed in body weight, adipose or lean tissue masses in the 2922-treated mice. Interestingly, circulating lipids, proinflammatory cytokines and atherosclerosis were unaltered in response to 2922, although a small reduction in LDL cholesterol was detected. CONCLUSIONS Importantly, 11beta-HSD1 inhibition leads to improved glucose metabolism and does not result in a worsening of atherosclerotic lesion area, yet retained antidiabetic potential in the face of multiple severe metabolic aberrations. This study reinforces the potential use of 11beta-HSD1 inhibitors in patients with the metabolic syndrome without negatively impacting atherosclerosis.

p53 is a critical tumor suppressor and is the most frequently inactivated gene in human cancer. Inhibition of the interaction of p53 with its negative regulator MDM2 represents a promising clinical strategy to treat p53 wild-type tumors. AMG 232 is a potential best-in-class inhibitor of the MDM2–p53 interaction and is currently in clinical trials. We characterized the activity of AMG 232 and its effect on p53 signaling in several preclinical tumor models. AMG 232 binds the MDM2 protein with picomolar affinity and robustly induces p53 activity, leading to cell-cycle arrest and inhibition of tumor cell proliferation. AMG 232 treatment inhibited the in vivo growth of several tumor xenografts and led to complete and durable regression of MDM2-amplified SJSA-1 tumors via growth arrest and induction of apoptosis. Therapeutic combination studies of AMG 232 with chemotherapies that induce DNA damage and p53 activity resulted in significantly superior antitumor efficacy and regression, and markedly increased activation of p53 signaling in tumors. These preclinical data support the further evaluation of AMG 232 in clinical trials as both a monotherapy and in combination with standard-of-care cytotoxics. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(3); 649–58. ©2015 AACR.