Search

Little is known about the long-term functional outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy.The aim of this study was to examine ileoanal pouch outcomes 20 and 30 years postoperatively.This is a retrospective case series.This study was conducted at a tertiary care referral center.Patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy between 1980 and 1994 were identified. Those with ≥20 years of in-person follow-up were included.Pouch function, pouchitis, anal stricture, and pouch failure rates were analyzed.A total of 203 patients had ≥20 years of follow-up. Of those, 71 had ≥30 years of follow-up. Initial diagnoses included ulcerative colitis (83%), indeterminate colitis (9%), familial adenomatous polyposis (4%), and Crohn's disease (3%). Twenty-one percent of those with ulcerative or indeterminate colitis later transitioned to Crohn's disease. Mean daily stool frequency was 7 (IQR 6-8), 38% experienced seepage, 31% had anal stenosis, 47% experienced pouchitis, and 18% had pouch failure. Over time, stool frequency increased in 41% of patients, stayed the same in 43%, and decreased in 16%. Patients older than 50 years at the time of construction had more daily bowel movements (median 8 vs 6; p = 0.02) and more seepage (77% vs 35%; p = 0.005) than those younger than 50 years. Patients with Crohn's disease had higher stool frequency (median 8 vs 6; p0.001) and higher rates of anal stenosis (44% vs 26%; p = 0.02), pouchitis (70% vs 40%; p0.001), and pouch failure (38% vs 12%; p0.001) compared to non-Crohn's patients. Patients with ≥30 years of follow-up had similar function as those with 20-30 years of follow-up.This was a retrospective, single-institution study. Only 35% of pouches created during the study period had20 years of follow-up.Most patients maintain reasonably good function and retain their pouches after 20 years. Over time, stool frequency and seepage increase. Older age and Crohn's disease are associated with worse outcomes. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B801.ANTECEDENTES:se sabe poco sobre los resultados funcionales a largo plazo de la proctocolectomía restauradora.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio fue examinar los resultados del reservorio ileoanal 20 y 30 años después de la operación.DISEÑO:Serie de casos retrospectiva.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Centro de referencia de atención terciariaPACIENTES:Se identificaron pacientes que se sometieron a proctocolectomía restauradora entre 1980 y 1994. Se incluyeron aquellos con ≥20 años de seguimiento en persona.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Se analizaron la función, inflamación, tasas de falla del reservorio y estenosis anal.RESULTADOS:Un total de 203 pacientes tuvieron ≥20 años de seguimiento. De ellos, 71 tenían ≥30 años de seguimiento. Los diagnósticos iniciales incluyeron colitis ulcerosa (83%), colitis indeterminada (9%), poliposis adenomatosa familiar (4%) y enfermedad de Crohn (3%). El 21% de las personas con colitis ulcerosa o indeterminada pasaron posteriormente a la enfermedad de Crohn. La frecuencia promedio de las deposiciones diarias fue de 7 (rango intercuartil 6-8), el 38% experimentó filtración, el 31% tuvo estenosis anal, el 47% experimentó pouchitis y el 18% tuvo falla del reservorio. Con el tiempo, la frecuencia de las deposiciones aumentó en el 41% de los pacientes, se mantuvo igual en el 43% y disminuyó en el 16%. Los pacientes mayores de 50 años en el momento de la construcción tenían más evacuaciones intestinales diarias (media 8 vs 6, p = 0,02) y más filtraciones (77% vs 35%, p = 0,005) que los menores de 50 años. Los pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn tenían mayor frecuencia de deposiciones (media 8 vs 6, p0,001) y tasas más altas de estenosis anal (44% vs 26%, p = 0,02), inflamacion (70% vs 40%, p0,001) y falla del reservorio (38% frente a 12%, p0,001) en comparación con pacientes que tenian enfermedad de Crohn. Los pacientes con ≥30 años de seguimiento tuvieron una función similar a aquellos con 20-30 años de seguimiento.LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo de una sola institución. Solo el 35% de los reservorios creados durante el período de estudio tuvieron más de 20 años de seguimiento.CONCLUSIONES:La mayoría de los pacientes mantienen una función razonablemente buena y conservan el reservorio después de 20 años. Con el tiempo, la frecuencia de las deposiciones y la filtración aumentan. La vejez y la enfermedad de Crohn se asocian con peores resultados. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B801. (Traducción - Dr. Ingrid Melo).

Objective To identify strategies and barriers to career progression in early-career colorectal surgeons. Design Qualitative research study performed via semi-structured interviews with early-career, board-certified colon, and rectal surgeons. Responses were analyzed, coded, and categorized to understand strategies towards career progression, perceived barriers to career progression, beliefs about case mix, and referral patterns. Setting Interviews conducted in person and via telephone across the United States and Canada. Participants Early-career board-certified colorectal surgeons Results Twenty-two board-certified colorectal surgeons currently employed in 14 states and 1 foreign country were interviewed. Fourty-five percent were female. Their current practice environment was described as academic (77%), private practice (18%), or military (5%). Seventy-seven percent of surgeons were satisfied with their career progression. Seventy-two percent were satisfied with the case volume. Seventy-two percent were satisfied with their case mix. When asked about strategies for career progression, surgeons made 77 comments focused on three main themes: optimization of their job search, optimization of relationships while on the job, and efforts to augment individual achievement. When asked about barriers to career advancement, surgeons most frequently commented on a lack of time and a lack of mentors. When asked about case mix, 63% of surgeons felt that they had no control over it. They were evenly divided between believing that a broad case mix or a niche specialized case mix was more instrumental for career progression. Conclusions Early-career colorectal surgeons were mostly satisfied with their career progression, volume, and case mix. In discussing their careers, many have developed a number of strategies focused on growth as an individual as well as relationship building. They also identified a number of barriers including lack of time and lack of mentorship. Early-career surgeons may be able to utilize these strategies and anticipate barriers prior to starting their first job, leading to greater likelihood of career satisfaction.

Horseshoe fistula is a challenging benign anorectal condition to treat. The aim of this study was to assess the utilization and success of different definitive fistula repair techniques in the treatment of horseshoe fistula.This was a retrospective case series which included all patients who were treated for horseshoe fistula from 2006 to 2019 at a single, tertiary care center and whom had at least one follow-up visit. Patients were excluded if 18 years of age or carried a diagnosis of Crohn's disease. Patients were assessed for fistula recurrence and incontinence.Sixty-eight patients were identified. On average, they were 47 years old, 63% male, and 18% current smokers. Seventy-nine percent required seton during their treatment course. Of the 8 first attempts at fistula repair, the types of repair included flap (15%), LIFT (35%), fistulotomy (31%), plug (12%), and fistulotomy and immediate reconstruction (1%). Recurrence for these procedures was as follows: flap 30%, LIFT 21%, fistulotomy 14%, plug 88%, and fistulotomy and immediate reconstruction 0%. Twelve patients who recurred underwent 17 additional procedures to attempt to cure their fistula. Overall, of those who underwent any attempt at definitive repair, 82% of patients were cured of their fistula, 12% had a chronic seton, and 6% had a chronic fistula. Thirteen percent of those who were cured had incontinence. The mean follow-up time was 1.1 years. Patients required a median of 3 procedures (range 1-11).Horseshoe fistula remains a complex anorectal condition. Successful repair can be performed in 80% of patients. However, repair can often require multiple surgical procedures.

OBJECTIVE Colorectal surgery (CRS) training has seen many changes over the years. This study sought to identify aspects of CRS residency curriculum that were most valued by recent graduates and what changes could be made to improve training. DESIGN Semistructured interviews were performed with board-certified colorectal surgeons 2 to 7years removed from their CRS residency. Interview responses were qualitatively analyzed and converted to coded, categorizable data. Subjects were recruited via a snowball sampling method. SETTING Interviews were conducted in person and via telephone with surgeons in a variety of practices across the United States and Canada. Analysis was performed by a team at Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA, an academic, tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS Board certified colorectal surgeons 2 to 7years removed from CRS residency. RESULTS Twenty surgeons from 11 different CRS residencies were interviewed. At the time of the interview, surgeons were employed in 13 states and 1 foreign country. When asked what aspects of their CRS residency were of value, surgeons produced 74 comments emphasizing: volume of cases (65% of subjects), variety of cases (55%), development of technical skills (40%), management of specific diseases (35%), faculty (30%), mentorship (30%), and practice management (15%). With regard to technical skills, surgeons cited pelvic surgery (40%) and minimally invasive techniques (45%) as the exposures that helped them become successful. When discussing what could be added to training, subjects made 54 comments identifying: more robotic exposure (35%), more anorectal disease (30%), more pelvic floor exposure (25%), and practice management/billing (35%) as items to incorporate. Sixty five percent of subjects believed that “nothing” should be eliminated from their training. CONCLUSIONS Young colon and rectal surgeons valued their training highly and strongly declined to eliminate any substantial part of the existing curriculum. They also expressed a strong desire to add more elements to the CRS residency including further robotic training, more anorectal, more pelvic floor, and further training in practice management.

Hospital readmission and anastomotic leak following colorectal resection have a negative impact on patients, surgeons, and the health care system. Novel markers of patients unlikely to experience these complications are of value in avoiding readmission.This study aimed to determine the predictive value of C-reactive protein for readmission and anastomotic leak within 30 days following colorectal resection.This is a retrospective review of a prospectively compiled single-institution database.From January 1, 2013, to July 20, 2017, consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal resection with anastomosis without the presence of proximal intestinal stoma, who had C-reactive protein measured on postoperative day 3, were included.The primary outcome measured was the predictive value of C-reactive protein measured on postoperative day 3 for readmission or anastomotic leak within 30 days after colorectal resection.Of the 752 patients examined, 73 (10%) were readmitted within 30 days of surgery and 17 (2%) had an anastomotic leak. Mean C-reactive protein in patients who neither had an anastomotic leak nor were readmitted (127 ± 77 mg/L) was lower than for patients who were readmitted (157 ± 96 mg/L, p = 0.002) and lower than for patients who had an anastomotic leak (228 ± 123 mg/L, p = 0.0000002). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein for readmission was 0.59, with a cutoff value of 145 mg/L, generating a 93% negative predictive value. The area under the curve for the diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein for anastomotic leak was 0.76, with a cutoff value of 147 mg/L generating a 99% negative predictive value.This study was limited by its retrospective design and because all patients were treated at a single center.Patients with a C-reactive protein below 145 mg/L on postoperative day 3 after colorectal resection have a low likelihood of readmission within 30 days, and a very low likelihood of anastomotic leak. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A761.

Colon and rectal surgery as a separate and identifiable specialty dates back to the early 1900s. Development of training programs, beginning as proctology preceptorships and evolving to residency programs recognized by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, demonstrate the value of the unwavering dedication of the founders of the field. Similarly, creation of an independent Board with its own certification procedures has maintained the independence and integrity of the specialty despite external pressures to return to general surgery. Both the development of the board and training programs are reviewed in detail.

The impact of process improvement through surgeon feedback on outcomes is unclear.We sought to evaluate the effect of biannual surgeon-specific feedback on outcomes and adherence to departmental and Surgical Care Improvement Project process measures on colorectal surgery outcomes.This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected 100% capture surgical quality improvement data.This study was conducted at the department of colorectal surgery at a tertiary care teaching hospital from January 2008 through December 2013.Each surgeon was provided with biannual feedback on process adherence and surgeon-specific outcomes of urinary tract infection, deep vein thrombosis, surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, 30-day readmission, reoperation, and mortality. We recorded adherence to Surgical Care Improvement Project process measures and departmentally implemented measures (ie, anastomotic leak testing) as well as surgeon-specific outcomes.We abstracted 7975 operations. There was no difference in demographics, laparoscopy, or blood loss. Adherence to catheter removal increased from 73% to 100% (p0.0001), whereas urinary tract infection decreased 52% (p0.01). Adherence to thromboprophylaxis administration remained unchanged as did the deep vein thrombosis rate (p = not significant). Adherence to preoperative antibiotic administration increased from 72% to 100% (p0.0001), whereas surgical site infection did not change (7.6%-6.6%; p = 0.3). There were 2589 operative encounters with anastomoses. For right-sided anastomoses, the proportion of handsewn anastomoses declined from 19% to 1.5% (p0.001). For left-sided anastomoses, without diversion, anastomotic leak testing adherence increased from 88% to 95% (p0.01). Overall leak rate decreased from 5.2% to 2.9% (p0.05).Concurrent process changes make isolation of the impact from individual process improvement changes challenging.Nearly complete adherence to process measures for deep vein thrombosis and surgical site infection did not lead to measureable outcomes improvement. Process measure adherence was associated with decreased rate of anastomotic leak and urinary tract infection. Biannual surgeon-specific feedback of outcomes was associated with improved process measure adherence and improvement in surgical quality.

The aim of this article is to evaluate geographic variation in the incidence of diverticulitis and examine behavioral and environmental factors associated with high rates of diverticulitis across the United States. We used state hospital discharge data from 20 states to determine rates of inpatient diverticulitis from January 2002 to December 2004 at patient's county of residence. Next, we merged the county level data with behavioral and environmental survey data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Finally, we determined the association between behavioral and environmental factors (i.e., teeth removal, dental cleaning, air quality, smoking, alcohol, vaccine, vitamins, and mental health) and high rates of diverticulitis. From January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2004, a total of 345,216 hospitalizations for acute diverticulitis were recorded for 1,055 counties. We identified rates of diverticulitis that ranged from 35.4 to 332.7 per 100,000 population. On univariate analysis, high diverticulitis burden was associated with regions of the country with substantial tooth loss from dental disease (45.8% for high diverticulitis counties vs. 37.5% for low diverticulitis counties; p = 0.0001). There is considerable variability in diverticulitis cases by county of residence across the nation. Potential triggers of diverticulitis may be associated with tooth removal and sun exposure.

The aim of this study was to determine whether there is an association between appendicitis and diverticulitis.This study is a retrospective cohort analysis.This study was conducted in a subspecialty practice at a tertiary care facility.We examined the rate of appendectomy among 4 cohorts of patients: 1) patients with incidentally identified diverticulosis on screening colonoscopy, 2) inpatients with medically treated diverticulitis, 3) patients who underwent left-sided colectomy for diverticulitis, and 4) patients who underwent colectomy for left-sided colorectal cancer.There were no interventions.The primary outcome measured was the appendectomy rate.We studied a total of 928 patients in this study. There were no differences in the patient characteristics of smoking status, nonsteroidal use, or history of irritable bowel syndrome across the 4 study groups. Patients with surgically treated diverticulitis had significantly more episodes of diverticulitis (2.8 ± 1.9) than the medically treated group (1.4 ± 0.8) (p0.0001). The rate of appendectomy was 8.2% for the diverticulosis control group, 13.5% in the cancer group, 23.5% in the medically treated diverticulitis group, and 24.5% in the surgically treated diverticulitis group (p0.0001). After adjusting for demographics and other clinical risk factors, patients with diverticulitis had 2.8 times higher odds of previous appendectomy (p0.001) than the control groups.The retrospective study design is associated with selection, documentation, and recall bias.Our data reveal significantly higher appendectomy rates in patients with a diagnosis of diverticulitis, medically or surgically managed, in comparison with patients with incidentally identified diverticulosis. Therefore, we propose that appendicitis and diverticulitis share similar risk factors and potentially a common pathological link.

Readmissions pose a significant hardship for patients and constitute a major quality and financial concern for hospitals. We sought to define risk factors associated with hospital readmission after colorectal surgery at a tertiary care hospital. We evaluated readmission among all patients who underwent a colorectal surgical procedure between July 16, 2007 and June 30, 2011. In a cohort of 4879 operative encounters, 492 (10%) were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. Procedures with highest readmissions included stoma creation (22%), ileoanal pouch surgery (22%), and total proctocolectomy (30%). In multivariate analysis, the following variables were associated with risk of readmission: postoperative complication, use of anxiolytics, high comorbidity score, patient setting, alcohol use, and stoma creation. Surgeon of record was not associated with readmission. In conclusion, several patient, procedural, and postoperative factors were associated with an increased risk of readmission. Considerably high rates of readmission were noted after stoma creation, ileoanal pouch procedures, and proctocolectomy. Surgeon of record was not associated with risk of read-mission, indicating little value to this metric as a physician-specific indicator of quality.

Colon and rectal surgery as a separate and identifiable specialty dates back to the early 1900s. Development of training programs, beginning as proctology preceptorships and evolving to residency programs recognized by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, demonstrate the value of the unwavering dedication of the founders of the field. Similarly, creation of an independent Board with its own certification procedures has maintained the independence and integrity of the specialty despite external pressures to return to general surgery. Both the development of the board and training programs are reviewed in detail.

BACKGROUND Efforts to improve the quality of surgical care and reduce morbidity and mortality have resulted in outcomes reporting at the service and institutional level. Surgeon-specific outcomes are not readily available. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to compare surgeon-specific outcomes from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and 100% capture institutional quality data. DESIGN We conducted a cohort study evaluating institutional and surgeon-specific outcomes following colorectal surgery procedures at 1 institution over 5 years. PATIENTS All patients who underwent an operation by a colorectal surgeon at Lahey Hospital & Medical Center from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2012 were identified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Thirty-day mortality, reoperation, urinary tract infection, deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, superficial surgical site infection, and organ space infection were the primary outcomes measured. ANALYSIS We compared annual and 5-year institutional and surgeon-specific adverse event rates between the data sets. In addition, we categorized individual surgeons as low-outlier, average, or high-outlier in relation to aggregate averages and determined the concordance between the data sets in identifying outliers. Concordance was designated if the 2 databases classified outlier status similarly for the same adverse event category. RESULTS In the 100% capture institutional data, 6459 operative encounters were identified in comparison with 1786 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program encounters (28% sampled). Annual aggregate adverse event rates were similar between the institutional data and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. For annual surgeon-specific comparisons, concordance in identifying outliers between the 2 data sets was 51.4%, and gross discordance between outlier status was in 8.2%. Five-year surgeon-specific comparisons demonstrated 59% concordance in identifying outlier status with 8.2% gross discordance for the group. LIMITATIONS The inclusion of data from only 1 academic referral center is a limitation of this study. CONCLUSIONS Each surgeon was identified as a "high outlier" in at least 1 adverse event category. Comparisons at the annual and 5-year points demonstrated poor concordance between our 100% capture institutional data and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.

There are various surgical techniques used treat anal fistulas. The adoption and success rates of newer techniques have not been clearly established.The purpose of this study was to determine the healing rate after operations for anal fistulas in New England colorectal surgery practices.We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database.The study was conducted at colorectal surgery practices in New England.A prospective, multicenter registry was created by the New England Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Surgeons were invited to collect data prospectively regarding patients operated on for anal fistulas between January 1, 2011, and August 1, 2013. Fistula classification, surgical intervention, continence scores, and healing were determined by the treating surgeon.Operation for anal fistula was performed.We measured the proportion of patients with healed fistulas at 3 months.Sixteen surgeons submitted data regarding 240 operations for fistula with curative intent. Mean patient age was 45 ± 14 years. A total of 158 patients (66%) were men, and 110 (46%) had undergone an anorectal operation. Twenty-nine (12%) had Crohn's disease. The healing rates of fistulotomy, advancement flap, and fistula plugs at 3 months were 94% (95% CI, 89-97), 60% (95% CI, 33-77), and 20% (95% CI, 5-50). The healing rate of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure at 3 months was 79% (95% CI, 65-88). Hospital site was the only variable associated with healing (p0.05). Hospitals that performed more ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedures had higher healing rates at 3 months (p0.0001).This study was limited by selection bias and reporting bias.A wide variety of techniques are used to treat anal fistulas in our region. Fistulotomy continues to have excellent results. There has been enthusiastic early adoption of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract technique. Early healing rates after the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure appear to be excellent.

The rate of reoperation after transabdominal as compared with transperineal repair for rectal prolapse is unknown. We evaluated all patients who underwent surgical treatment for rectal prolapse performed through transabdominal or transperineal repair from the trackable California Inpatient data files and Revisit Analyses during the time period of January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2007. We specifically evaluated rates of reoperation and stoma formation during the 36-month study period. A total of 3400 patient discharges with rectal prolapse from California during the 36-month study period was identified. Of this cohort, 1772 patients had one or more prolapse repairs. Procedures were more likely to be performed through a transabdominal (1035 [58%]) as compared with a transperineal approach (737 [42%]). There was no difference in reoperation for transabdominal (11%) as compared with transperineal procedures (11%; P = 0.9). However, a significantly larger proportion of patients underwent stoma formation after transabdominal (8%) as compared with transperineal repair (5%; P < 0.02). Time to reoperation was not significantly different for patients treated with transabdominal (295 ± 254 days) as compared with transperineal repair (271 ± 246 days; P = 0.6). In conclusion, the risk of reoperation is substantial for both transabdominal and transperineal procedures for rectal prolapse.

Validated risk adjustment programs do not use patient diagnosis as a potential covariate in the evaluation of organ space infections.We hypothesized that patient diagnosis is an important risk factor for organ space infection after colorectal resections.We conducted a retrospective cohort study abstracting data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from January 2005 through December 2009.Patients who underwent 1 of 3 types of colorectal resections (ileocolostomy, partial colectomy, and coloproctostomy) were identified by the use of Current Procedural Terminology codes. We excluded patients with concomitant formation of diverting or end stoma.The primary outcome measured was organ space infection.Validated risk adjustment models were used with the addition of diagnostic codes.We identified 52,056 patients who underwent a colorectal resection of whom 1774 patients developed an organ space infection (3.4%) and 894 (50.2%) returned to the operating room for further surgery. For ileocolostomy, operations for endometriosis (OR, 7.8; 95% CI, 1.7-36.6) and intra-abdominal fistula surgery (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.5-6.0) were associated with increased risk of organ space infection. For partial colectomy, operations for intra-abdominal fistula surgery (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.3), IBD (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.6-3.8), and bowel obstruction (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6) were associated with an increased risk of organ space infection. For coloproctostomy, operations for malignant neoplasm (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.3) and diverticular bleeding (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-9.0) were associated with an increased risk of organ space infection.This study was limited by the retrospective study design.After adjustment for National Surgical Quality Improvement Program covariates, intra-abdominal fistula, endometriosis, and diverticular bleeding were the diagnoses associated with the highest risk of organ space infection following colorectal resections.

In this study we sought to identify changes in the etiology and surgical treatment of acute gastrointestinal perforations in the United States over the past 20 years. We performed a retrospective review of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from January 1, 1988, through December 31, 2007. We first identified all patients with gastrointestinal perforations, the perforated organ, and treatment rendered. During the study period, 550,132 patients experienced a gastrointestinal perforation for a mean rate of 3.9 cases per 1,000 discharges. Total number of perforations rose significantly over the study period, yet surgical procedures were performed in less than half of the patients (47.6%). The most common surgical procedures for gastrointestinal perforation were colorectal in origin (38.3%), upper gastrointestinal tract (30.0%), small intestine (29.2%), esophagus (3.0%), and anus (0.1%). At study end, colorectal procedures for perforation were the most commonly performed (40.4%), whereas upper gastrointestinal procedures experienced the greatest decline. In conclusion, our data demonstrate a decline in procedures for upper gastrointestinal perforation and an increase in colorectal procedures during the two-decade study period. These data should be used to assist in the training of acute care surgeons.

To develop and evaluate an objective method of technical skills assessment for graduating subspecialists in colorectal (CR) surgery-the Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (COSATS).It may be reasonable for the public to assume that surgeons certified as competent have had their technical skills assessed. However, technical skill, despite being the hallmark of a surgeon, is not directly assessed at the time of certification by surgical boards.A procedure-based, multistation technical skills examination was developed to reflect a sample of the range of skills necessary for CR surgical practice. These consisted of bench, virtual reality, and cadaveric models. Reliability and construct validity were evaluated by comparing 10 graduating CR residents with 10 graduating general surgery (GS) residents from across North America. Expert CR surgeons, blinded to level of training, evaluated performance using a task-specific checklist and a global rating scale. The mean global rating score was used as the overall examination score and a passing score was set at "borderline competent for CR practice."The global rating scale demonstrated acceptable interstation reliability (0.69) for a homogeneous group of examinees. Both the overall checklist and global rating scores effectively discriminated between CR and GS residents (P0.01), with 27% of the variance attributed to level of training. Nine CR residents but only 3 GS residents were deemed competent.The Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill effectively discriminated between CR and GS residents. With further validation, the Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill could be incorporated into the colorectal board examination where it would be the first attempt of a surgical specialty to formally assess technical skill at the time of certification.

There has been increased attention focused on reducing postoperative length of stay and mortality following colorectal surgery. We sought to identify adverse events associated with prolonged length of stay and mortality. We evaluated postoperative “adverse events,” prolonged length of stay, and mortality within 30 days of colorectal surgery in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) hospitals from January 2005 through December 2008. We then used multivariate models to establish the associations between adverse events and prolonged length of stay and mortality. A total of 54,237 patients underwent colorectal surgery: 39,980 (74 %) experienced no postoperative adverse events, while 14,257 (26 %) experienced one or more adverse events. Length of stay was prolonged (longer than 10 days) in 38 % of patients who experienced a postoperative adverse event and in 15 % of patients without events. Mortality increased with the number of postoperative adverse events. In multivariate models including preoperative comorbidity, patient risk factors, and adverse events, patients who experienced a cardiac arrest, septic shock, stroke, myocardial infarction, and/or renal failure were at highest odds of dying within 30 days of surgery. Patients with cardiac arrest, septic shock, stroke, myocardial infarction, and/or renal failure are at highest risk of mortality following colorectal surgery.

Readmissions pose a significant hardship for patients and constitute a major quality and financial concern for hospitals. We sought to define risk factors associated with hospital readmission after colorectal surgery at a tertiary care hospital. We evaluated readmission among all patients who underwent a colorectal surgical procedure between July 16, 2007 and June 30, 2011. In a cohort of 4879 operative encounters, 492 (10%) were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. Procedures with highest readmissions included stoma creation (22%), ileoanal pouch surgery (22%), and total proctocolectomy (30%). In multivariate analysis, the following variables were associated with risk of readmission: postoperative complication, use of anxiolytics, high comorbidity score, patient setting, alcohol use, and stoma creation. Surgeon of record was not associated with readmission. In conclusion, several patient, procedural, and postoperative factors were associated with an increased risk of readmission. Considerably high rates of readmission were noted after stoma creation, ileoanal pouch procedures, and proctocolectomy. Surgeon of record was not associated with risk of readmission, indicating little value to this metric as a physician-specific indicator of quality.

Data comparing surgical outcomes following abdominal and transperineal approaches for rectal prolapse are limited.We sought to identify differences in postoperative complications following abdominal vs transperineal approaches to rectal prolapse.We studied a retrospective cohort in the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from January 2005 through December 2008.We identified all patients who underwent surgical treatment for rectal prolapse.We compared surgical outcomes of standard abdominal approaches compared with standard transperineal approaches to rectal prolapse.The primary outcomes measured were the validated morbidity outcomes and 30-day mortality.During the study period, 1485 patients underwent rectal prolapse surgery (706 abdominal and 779 transperineal). Patients treated with abdominal approaches had significantly higher rates of infectious (9.8% vs 3.7%) and overall (12.9% vs 7.6%) complications in comparison with those treated with transperineal approaches. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for overall complications were ASA class 4 (OR 6.4) and abdominal surgery (OR 2.3), whereas an albumin level of ≥ 2.5 was protective (OR 0.05). Significant predictors of infectious complications were ASA class 4 (OR 7.5), BMI25 (OR 1.8), and rectal prolapse surgery performed with an abdominal approach (OR 2.8).The retrospective design introduces potential selection bias.Abdominal surgery for rectal prolapse is a predictor of both infectious and overall complications. Patients with significant comorbidities or a high BMI are at particularly high risk for complications and may be better suited for a transperineal rather than abdominal approach for the treatment of rectal prolapse.

Aim We sought to identify the rate of re-operation after an index colorectal surgical procedure and potential contributing risk factors. Method This is a retrospective cohort study from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. We identified all patients who either returned or did not return to the operating room after any colorectal resection from January 2005 to December 2008. Results From a total cohort of 635 265 patients included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program over the 4-year study period, we identified 54 237 patients who underwent colorectal operations. A return to the operating room was coded in 5.4 ± 0.1% of non colorectal resection patients and 7.6 ± 0.2% of colorectal resection patients (P

There is wide variation in surgical care for rectal cancer in the United States.This study aimed to assess the differences in individual surgeon procedural profiles that might explain variations in the rates of restorative vs nonrestorative proctectomy for rectal cancer.This study was a retrospective examination of a cohort derived from trackable state hospital discharge data from 11 states.We identified all patients with rectal cancer that underwent restorative proctectomy (sphincter-sparing surgery) vs nonrestorative proctectomy (colostomy formation) over a 24-month study period (January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2004).We developed an inpatient procedural profile of each treating surgeon's practice across general surgery procedure codes and summed the number of restorative vs nonrestorative proctectomies for rectal cancer by surgeon.The primary outcome measures were nonrestorative proctectomy, mortality, and length of stay.A total of 7519 proctectomies were performed for rectal cancer by 2588 surgeons. During the 24-month study period, 1003 (38.8%) surgeons performed only nonrestorative procedures for rectal cancer. On multivariate analysis, the likelihood that a surgeon performed only nonrestorative procedures was increased if that surgeon performed more integumentary procedures and decreased if the surgeon performed at least one ileoanal pouch procedure or more anorectal procedures. Patients who underwent proctectomy by surgeons who performed only nonrestorative procedures had significantly higher mortality (2.5 ± 0.7%) and longer length of stay (11.3 ± 8.8 days) in comparison with those patients treated by surgeons who performed both restorative and nonrestorative procedures (1.3 ± 0.3% mortality and 9.2 ± 6.9 days, P.001 for both analyses). The volume of proctectomy performed significantly affected all analyses.: The retrospective design introduces potential selection bias.Over a 24-month period, 38.8% of surgeons performed only nonrestorative procedures for rectal cancer. These surgeons did not regularly perform anorectal or ileoanal pouch procedures, suggesting that they may not have a focus on colorectal disease in their practice; they had significantly higher mortality and length of stay for their patients who underwent proctectomy for rectal cancer.

In this study, we analyzed temporal trends in anti-adhesion barrier application and admission rates for small bowel obstruction. We used data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and identified patients with ICD-9 codes for “application or administration of anti-adhesion barrier substances” from October 2002 through December 2007. Next, we identified cases of bowel obstruction coded from January 1997 through December 2007. We then used Kendall correlation analyses and the Joinpoint regression program to evaluate changes in trends. From October 1, 2002 through December 31, 2007, a total of 28,014 patients had an anti-adhesion barrier substance applied. During the study period, application of anti-adhesion barriers increased from 0.7 applications per 100,000 to 2.6 applications per 100,000 population (Joinpoint and Kendall; P < 0.002). Since 1997 there has been a steady rise in hospitalizations for bowel obstruction, increasing from 18.3 cases per 100,000 to 19.8 cases per 100,000 population (Joinpoint and Kendall; P < 0.002). In conclusion, the application of anti-adhesion barriers has increased significantly since 2002, yet bowel obstructions continue to be a major health problem.

Geographic variability in the use of restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer has been described throughout the United States. We examined factors associated with high rates of colostomy formation after proctectomy for rectal cancer across US counties.We used state hospital discharge data from 21 states to determine county rates of restorative proctectomy vs nonrestorative proctectomy (ie, colostomy) for rectal cancer. We merged the county-level data with 1) tumor characteristics from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results data; 2) number of specialty surgeons in the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and Society of Surgical Oncology; 3) county socioeconomic variables from census data; 4) colorectal cancer-screening rates from Medicare; and 5) hospital characteristics from the American Hospital Association. We then determined factors associated with high rates of colostomy formation (60%) after proctectomy for rectal cancer across counties.From January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2004, a total of 19,912 proctectomies were performed for cancer in 1050 counties, of which 489 had adequate sample size for evaluation. Based on county of residence information, nonrestorative proctectomy with colostomy was performed in greater than 60% of all patients with rectal cancer in 26% (n = 125) of counties. On multivariate analysis, more specialty surgeons (OR = 0.70; CI = 0.51-0.96) were protective against colostomy formation at the county level.The use of restorative techniques in rectal cancer surgery varies based on access to specialty colorectal cancer surgeons. Population-based directives are needed to standardize care for rectal cancer across the United States.

The ultimate fate of the leaking intestinal anastomosis is unknown. We sought to analyze long-term outcomes of anastomotic leak with an emphasis on identifying the likelihood of re-establishing intestinal continuity and the potential for releak with corrective surgery.All consecutive subjects treated for clinical anastomotic leak from January 2001 through December 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by management of leak: (1) drainage alone, (2) proximal loop diversion, (3) repair/revision without diversion, (4) end stoma, or (5) tube enterostomy. We then determined management of anastomotic leak, mortality, corrective procedures, releak, and re-establishment of intestinal continuity.In a database of 2,627 intestinal procedures, 79 patients had 88 anastomotic leaks with a final overall mortality of 10.1%. The aggregate rate of re-establishment of intestinal continuity was lowest for the patients treated by end stoma (44.4%) as compared to other initial management options (p0.01). Of the patients who survived their initial anastomotic leak, 20.5% had another leak (releak).Patients who underwent resection of the leaking anastomosis and end stoma or proximal loop diversion have a high rate of long-term fecal diversion. The proportion of patients who experience an anastomotic releak is substantial following further corrective surgery to re-establish intestinal continuity.

Background We sought to determine the differential role of patient safety indicator (PSI) events on mortality after weekend as compared with weekday admission. Materials and methods We evaluated Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality PSI events within a cohort of patients with nonelective admissions. First, we identified all patients with a PSI based on day of admission (weekend versus weekday). Then, we evaluated the outcome of mortality after each PSI event. Finally, we entered age, sex, race, median household income, payer information, and Charlson comorbidity scores in regression models to develop risk ratios of weekend to weekday PSI events and mortality. Results There were 28,236,749 patients evaluated with 428,685 (1.5%) experiencing one or more PSI events. The rate of PSI was the same for patients admitted on weekends as compared to weekdays (1.5%). However, the risk of mortality was 7% higher if a PSI event occurred to a patient admitted on a weekend as compared with a weekday. In addition, compared to patients admitted on weekdays, patients admitted on weekends had a 36% higher risk of postoperative wound dehiscence, 19% greater risk of death in a low-mortality diagnostic-related group, 19% increased risk of postoperative hip fracture, and 8% elevated risk of surgical inpatient death. Conclusions Risk adjusted data reveal that PSI events are substantially higher among patients admitted on weekends. The considerable differences in death after PSI events in patients admitted on weekends as compared with weekdays indicate that responses to adverse events may be less effective on weekends.

Operative results of volvulus are largely unknown because of infrequent diagnosis.We examined the results of operative intervention for colonic volvulus.We merged trackable data from the California Inpatient Database with Supplemental Files for Revisit Analyses between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007.Trackable data from California discharge records.We identified all of the patients with colonic volvulus who underwent 1 of 4 surgical procedures, including manipulation/fixation of the colon, right colectomy, left colectomy, or total colectomy.During the 36-month study period, we identified recurrence risk, recurrence requiring reoperation, time to reoperation, stoma formation, disposition on discharge, and in-hospital mortality. Fisher exact, χ(2), and ANOVA tests were used when appropriate.We identified 2141 patients with colonic volvulus who were undergoing intraoperative manipulation/fixation of the colon (n = 209 (12%)), right (n = 728 (41%)), left (n = 781 (44%)), or total colectomy (n = 56 (3%)). Patients treated with intraoperative manipulation/fixation were younger, more likely to be women, and more likely to have private insurance. Patients who underwent total colectomy had the highest risk of mortality (21%), highest risk of stoma creation (64%), and longest length of stay (18 days); were more likely to be readmitted (9%); and were the most likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility (48%). Patients treated with intraoperative manipulation/fixation had the lowest mortality, risk of stoma formation, length of stay, and likelihood of discharge to skilled nursing facility but the highest risk of subsequent procedures for volvulus (26%) over a follow-up ranging from 0 to 687 days.This study was limited by retrospective study design, heterogeneous patient factors, and inability to identify the time of last follow-up.The majority of patients with volvulus underwent a resectional procedure. A subset without resection had favorable initial outcomes but remained at high risk for subsequent procedures. There may be a potential role for evaluating intraoperative manipulation/fixation in a small subset of patients with colonic volvulus.

Background Minimum numbers of cases required for certification by the American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery (ABCRS) have been determined from a prospective database of all applicants applying for examination since 1989. These data represent the longitudinal evolution of practice patterns in tertiary colorectal training programs. Study design After obtaining permission from the ABCRS, access to the database was obtained and data from the 12-year period 1994 to 2005 were analyzed. Results The database contains the operative and endoscopic case numbers of 673 residents. The number of training programs increased from 28 to 39 (28%) and the number of residency positions from 50 to 66 (24%). Median numbers of anorectal patients per resident remained remarkably constant over the period of study. Both rigid sigmoidoscopy (67 to 44 per resident) and flexible sigmoidoscopy (135.5 to 39 per resident) decreased substantially; colonoscopy volume increased (209 to 264 per resident). Perineal procedures for rectal prolapse consistently comprise 50% to 60% of the total procedures for prolapse. Low anterior resection for rectal cancer outnumber abdominoperineal resections by a 3/1 ratio. Coloanal anastomoses have steadily increased. Laparoscopic approaches for all abdominal operations have increased substantially, with the greatest increase being in diverticular resections (6.5% to 44.7%). Conclusions Prospective data collection by ABCRS has permitted calculation of minimum numbers of operative cases for training colorectal surgeons, with the advantage of a rolling average that reflects evolving practice patterns in teaching programs. Analysis of these data allows planning of needs-based educational programs and may ultimately be involved in designing the maintenance of certification process.

The rate of reoperation after transabdominal as compared with transperineal repair for rectal prolapse is unknown. We evaluated all patients who underwent surgical treatment for rectal prolapse performed through transabdominal or transperineal repair from the trackable California Inpatient data files and Revisit Analyses during the time period of January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2007. We specifically evaluated rates of reoperation and stoma formation during the 36-month study period. A total of 3400 patient discharges with rectal prolapse from California during the 36-month study period was identified. Of this cohort, 1772 patients had one or more prolapse repairs. Procedures were more likely to be performed through a transabdominal (1035 [58%]) as compared with a transperineal approach (737 [42%]). There was no difference in reoperation for transabdominal (11%) as compared with transperineal procedures (11%; P = 0.9). However, a significantly larger proportion of patients underwent stoma formation after transabdominal (8%) as compared with transperineal repair (5%; P0.02). Time to reoperation was not significantly different for patients treated with transabdominal (295 ± 254 days) as compared with transperineal repair (271 ± 246 days; P = 0.6). In conclusion, the risk of reoperation is substantial for both transabdominal and transperineal procedures for rectal prolapse.

Background There is an accelerated effort to reduce hospital readmissions despite minimal data detailing risk factors associated with this outcome. Materials and methods We analyzed National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data from January 1, 2011–December 31, 2011, evaluating all patients undergoing one of 34 targeted operative procedures across all surgical specialties. Multivariate regression models of risk for readmission were developed including targeted procedure codes, demographic variables, preoperative variables, intraoperative variables, and postoperative adverse events. Our main outcome measure was hospital readmission. Results A total of 217, 389 patients met study inclusion criteria. Minimal associations existed between patient factors and risk of readmission. Adverse events including unplanned operating room return (odds ratio [OR] 8.5; confidence interval [CI] 8.0–9.0), pulmonary embolism (OR 8.2; CI 7.1–9.6), deep incisional infection (OR 7.5; CI 6.7–8.5), and organ space infection (OR 5.8; CI 5.3–6.3) were associated with increased risk of readmission. Our data suggest the type of procedure performed is significantly associated with risk of readmission. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed procedures, involving the pancreas, rectum, bladder, and lower extremity vascular bypass, were associated with the highest risk of readmission. Conclusions Postoperative complications demonstrated stronger association with readmission than patient factors. Focused analysis of higher risk procedures may provide insight into strategies for risk reduction.

A variety of devices are available for pedicle ligation during laparoscopic colectomy including vascular staplers, clips, and electrothermal bipolar vessel-sealing devices. This study assesses their speed, reliability, and cost to guide surgeons in their choice for intracorporeal pedicle ligation.A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic vascular staplers and disposable clip appliers (S/C) with the LigaSure Atlas (LIG) was performed during elective right, left, and total colectomy. Cases were stratified by procedure. Failure was defined as any bleeding after proper pedicle ligation.The study included 48 S/C patients and 52 LIG patients with no differences in demographics, diagnosis, procedure, number of vessels ligated per procedure, or operative time. Failure occurred for 14 (9.2%) of the 152 vessels ligated in the S/C group, as compared with 5 (3%) of the 169 vessels ligated in the LIG group (p = 0.02). The median blood loss associated with device failure was 50 ml (range, 20-50 ml) in S/C group, as compared with 100 ml (range 25-800 ml) in the LIG group (p = 0.054). Major blood loss attributable to device failure and surgeon error occurred in only one LIG case. The mean cost per case of vessel ligation was significantly less in the LIG group (317 dollars +/- 0 dollars vs 400 dollars +/- 112 dollars; p0.001). The cost differences were greatest for total colectomy (LIG = 317 dollars +/- 0 dollars vs S/C = 565 dollars +/- 67 dollars; p = 0.002).Device failure, although more common in the S/C group, does not result in significant blood loss. The LigaSure Atlas is more cost effective during laparoscopic colectomy, especially total colectomy, and may allow the surgeon more versatility in its application.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy is thought to facilitate colonic mobilization while maintaining the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. Although previous studies of hand-assisted colectomy have focused on segmental colonic resection, the use of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy has not been investigated. This study evaluated the effectiveness of hand-assisted laparoscopic approach compared with a conventional laparoscopic method in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy. From a prospective database, a consecutive series of patients were identified undergoing conventional and hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy and results were compared. Twenty-three patients, comprising 10 hand-assisted and 13 conventional laparoscopic patients, were identified. Patient characteristics, perioperative parameters, and outcomes were assessed. Both groups were well matched with no differences in age, gender, body mass index, operative indication, diagnosis, comorbidity, or steroid usage. There were no differences among incision size between the hand-assisted (8 (range, 8–20) cm) and conventional laparoscopic cases (8 (range, 5–10) cm). The median operative time was significantly shorter in the hand-assisted group (247 (range, 210–390) minutes) compared with the conventional laparoscopic group (300 (range, 240–400) minutes; P < 0.01). The length of stay was similar between groups (hand-assisted: 4 (range, 3–13) days vs. conventional: 6 (range, 4–17) days). Complications occurred in four hand-assisted patients (40 percent; 2 ileus, mechanical obstruction, and dehydration) and in four patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic method (31 percent; 2 anastomotic leak, ileus, and mechanical obstruction). Compared with conventional laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy, the hand-assisted method resulted in a significant reduction in operative time without detriment to bowel function, length of stay, or patient outcome. The hand-assisted approach to restorative proctocolectomy is likely to replace conventional laparoscopic methods as the preferred laparoscopic approach for this technically challenging procedure.

BACKGROUND: Chromosome 3q gain has been identified in human papillomavirus–infected cervical cancer cells. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the presence of chromosomal 3q gain in anal neoplasia. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in a group colorectal surgery practice. PATIENTS: Fifty-two patients with no dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, or anal cancer were studied. INTERVENTIONS: Pairs of biopsy specimens were paraffin embedded and reviewed. One of each slide pair was stained with hematoxylin and eosin and the second processed for fluorescence in situ hybridization. The hybridized set was deparaffinized first and then hybridized with a probe for the chromosome 3q26 region. Then, slides were scanned using an automated fluorescence microscopy system that analyzed defined areas of the tissue to enumerate all of the nuclei for hybridized probe signals to detect chromosome 3q gain. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured for gain in chromosome 3q26. RESULTS: We identified chromosome 3q gain in 7 (78%) of 9 patients with squamous-cell cancer, 8 (53%) of 15 high-grade dysplasia samples, 0 of 12 low-grade dysplasia samples, and 0 of 16 samples with no dysplasia. The sensitivity for high-grade or invasive neoplasia was 58%, with a specificity of 100%. The positive predictive value of the test was 100% for detecting high-grade dysplasia and/or squamous-cell cancer from no dysplasia, and the negative predictive value of the test was 62%. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its small sample size and retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: Chromosome 3q gain represents an important shared pathway to tumorigenesis in cervical and anal neoplasia. Multiple potential diagnostic roles exist for this easily performed test in the evaluation of anal neoplasia.

The objective of this study was to identify clinical leak in diverted colorectal anastomoses. Cohort analysis. The study was conducted in a subspecialty practice at a tertiary care facility. Consecutive subjects undergoing colorectal anastomosis and proximal fecal diversion between July 16, 2007 and June, 31 2012. No intervention was applied. Clinical anastomotic leak. Two hundred forty-five patients underwent a colorectal anastomosis with proximal fecal diversion. A total of 34 (14 %) clinical leaks were identified at a median of 43 days. Clinical leaks were identified in 13 (5 %) patients within 30 days of surgery (early leaks) and in 21 (9 %) patients after 30 days of surgery (late leaks). Age, sex, use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and method of anastomotic construction were similar in patients with clinical leaks as compared to those with no evidence of leak. However, clinical leaks were more likely to develop in patients with a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease or other diagnoses, i.e., radiation enteritis, ischemia, and injury/enterotomy. Patients with clinical leak were not more likely to have air leaks on intraoperative air leak testing. In diverted anastomoses, most leaks become clinically apparent beyond 30 days. The standard practice of censoring outcomes that occur beyond postoperative day 30 will fail to identify a substantial fraction of leaks in diverted colorectal anastomoses.

In this study we sought to identify changes in the etiology and surgical treatment of acute gastrointestinal perforations in the United States over the past 20 years. We performed a retrospective review of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from January 1, 1988, through December 31, 2007. We first identified all patients with gastrointestinal perforations, the perforated organ, and treatment rendered. During the study period, 550,132 patients experienced a gastrointestinal perforation for a mean rate of 3.9 cases per 1,000 discharges. Total number of perforations rose significantly over the study period, yet surgical procedures were performed in less than half of the patients (47.6%). The most common surgical procedures for gastrointestinal perforation were colorectal in origin (38.3%), upper gastrointestinal tract (30.0%), small intestine (29.2%), esophagus (3.0%), and anus (0.1%). At study end, colorectal procedures for perforation were the most commonly performed (40.4%), whereas upper gastrointestinal procedures experienced the greatest decline. In conclusion, our data demonstrate a decline in procedures for upper gastrointestinal perforation and an increase in colorectal procedures during the two-decade study period. These data should be used to assist in the training of acute care surgeons.

Ultimately it is the responsibility of the American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery to provide a system of evaluation that translates into competent patient care. Particularly with the maintenance of certification program that strives to provide an environment of lifelong learning and improvement, the implications of board certification are much more comprehensive than in the past. Because of the pivotal role of resident education in the process, the Board must be a substantive participant in all aspects of resident education. Definition of competence, not only technical but behavioral, will be a continual challenge.

PURPOSE: The main impetus for a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis to choose colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis over ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the better functional result. However, does better functional result necessarily translate into better overall quality of life? Previous studies of other diseases have demonstrated no such correlation. This study was performed to determine whether any relationship exists between functional result and quality of life in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after ileorectal anastomosis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: All patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who underwent colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis from 1980 to 1998 were studied. Functional data were obtained by questionnaire. Health-related quality of life was assessed by two validated instruments, the SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales and the SF-36 Health Survey, which measure physical and mental functioning and eight separate health-quality dimensions, including health perception, physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, mental health, bodily pain, and energy or fatigue. RESULTS: Data were obtained in 44 of 68 patients, 14 with ileorectal anastomosis and 30 with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. No differences were demonstrated between the two groups for patient age, mean follow-up time, and mean patient age at operation. Functional results were worse for the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis groupvs. the ileorectal anastomosis group in number of bowel movements per day (7.5vs. 5.2;P

Diverticular disease of the colon: A century-old problem David Schoetz; Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE: This study investigated the functional significance of perineal complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: Review of a prospective registry of 628 patients was undertaken. Bowel function was assessed by detailed functional questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-squared and Fisher's exact probability tests. RESULTS: Of 628 patients, 153 (24.4 percent) had 171 perineal complications. The 277 control patients had no complications. Complications included 66 (10.5 percent) anastomotic strictures, 28 (4.5 percent) anastomotic separations, 36 (5.7 percent) pouch fistulas, 41 (6.5 percent) episodes of pelvic sepsis, and 18 (2.9 percent) patients with multiple complications. After these complications were addressed, the pouch failure rate was low (10 percent); in 90 percent of patients, the pouch could be salvaged. Most pouch failures were the result of pouch fistulas, and most occurred in patients ultimately diagnosed with Crohn's disease. Functional results after cure of these perineal complications revealed no significant functional differences between control patients and those cured of anastomotic separations, anastomotic strictures, and pouch fistulas. Only a few minor differences were demonstrated in function after an episode of pelvic sepsis. The major deterioration in function occurred after treatment for multiple perineal complications. CONCLUSIONS: An appreciable number of perineal complications occur after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Pouch-perineal fistulas are associated with the highest pouch failure rate. The majority of these fistulas occur in patients ultimately diagnosed with Crohn's disease or indeterminate colitis. Although there is no substitute for good technique and sound clinical judgment in the success of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, if perineal complications are successfully treated, functional outcome is equivalent to that in patients without perineal complications.

PURPOSE: Assessment of sustained voluntary contraction of the external sphincter is helpful in evaluating the patient who has a defecation disorder on presentation. A new index of external sphincter function is described. METHOD: A prospective registry of patients referred for computerized anal manometry using standard protocols was reviewed. Patients were grouped by primary symptoms; those with overlapping complaints were excluded. The rate of fatigue, defined as the change in stationary squeeze over a 40-second period of voluntary contraction, was calculated by linear regression analysis. Fatigue rate index, a calculated measure of time necessary for the external sphincter to become completely fatigued, was determined to permit comparison of external sphincter fatigue in patients with different complaints. RESULTS: Twenty-six healthy volunteers (15 women; mean age, 45 years), 33 patients with a primary complaint of anal seepage (13 women; mean age, 53 years), 75 patients with gross incontinence (61 women; mean age, 53 years), and 49 patients with severe constipation (41 women; mean age, 45 years) were evaluated. Mean resting and squeeze pressures were 55 mmHg and 107 mmHg for volunteers, 37 mmHg and 97 mmHg for patients with seepage, 30 mmHg and 49 mmHg for incontinent patients, and 56 mmHg and 93 mmHg for constipated patients. Pudendal neuropathy, as evidenced by a prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (>2.4 ms), was identified in 13 percent of volunteers, 32 percent of patients with seepage, 54 percent of incontinent patients, and 38 percent of constipated patients. Mean fatigue rate index was 3.3 minutes for volunteers, 2.3 minutes for seepage patients, 1.5 minutes for incontinent patients, and 2.8 minutes for constipated patients. Compared with volunteers and patients with seepage, the incontinent patients had a significantly shorter fatigue rate index (P

PURPOSE: The study contained herein used the database of the American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery to demonstrate trends in colorectal practice from 1989 to 1996 and to compare the one-year technical experience of a colorectal resident with the five-year totals of a general surgery resident. METHODS: Complete case lists from applicants for the American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery's qualifying examination have been entered into a database. Similar data have been compiled from the Residency Review Committee for Surgery. RESULTS: From 1989 through 1996, 446,082 procedures have been listed by 417 colorectal residents, an average of 1,060 cases per resident. When contrasted with the operative experience of a general surgery resident, the colorectal resident performs substantially more anorectal operations, more endoscopic procedures, and more index abdominal operations in one year than the average general surgery resident performs in five years. CONCLUSIONS: When added to the required general surgery experience, one year of training in colorectal surgery trains a true subspecialist with unique expertise in the treatment of disorders of the colon, rectum, and anus.

PURPOSE: Fecal incontinence may occur in several forms. Although some patients are grossly incontinent, other patients experience only leakage. In patients with gross incontinence, severity can range from the mildest forms (limited to loss of control of flatus) to the most severe forms (involving loss of solid stool). This study was undertaken to determine which physiologic parameters differentiate female patients with incontinence of solid stool from patients with control of formed stool and incontinence limited to seep age. METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive female patients with a primary complaint of seepage or solid stool incontinence were evaluated using water perfusion manometry, balloon inflation assessment of rectal sensitivity, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency. A prospectively maintained database was used for collection of data. The findings in the two patient groups were compared with patients in a group of normal control individuals. Ages of the women in the three groups were similar. RESULTS: Both groups of patients demonstrated statistically significant (P < 0.05) decreases in rest and squeeze sphincter lengths, pressures, and pressure volumes compared with normal volunteers. The patients also had significantly more asymmetric highpressure zones and hypersensitive rectums. No significant difference between the two groups of incontinent patients could be identified using any of these parameters. Significant differences between the groups were found in pudendal nerve function. The distal rectoanal excitatory reflex was abnormal in 58.1 percent of grossly incontinent women compared with 28.6 percent of patients with leakage (P < 0.05). The majority of patients with leakage alone (65 percent) had normal pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, whereas only 22.6 percent of women with gross fecal incontinence had normal pudendal nerve terminal motor latency bilaterally (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Normal bilateral pudendal nerve function can partially compensate for abnormal sphincter symmetry and function, permitting women with grossly abnormal parameters to maintain control of bowel movements. It remains to be seen whether, with advancing age, patients with leakage will have development of slowed pudendal nerve conduction and, if so, whether their condition will progress to gross incontinence.

PURPOSE: In response to external pressure to achieve an idealized length of stay after colon resection, a study was designed to define perioperative factors that significantly impact average length of stay (ALOS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 226 patients undergoing open colon resection from 1988 to 1995 to determine the effects of age, type of procedure, nature of the procedure (electivevs.emergency), and postoperative course on ALOS. Statistics were calculated by Student'st-test, chisquared analysis, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Average length of stay was 10 (range, 4–34) days, with a significant trend toward lower ALOS in recent years; ALOS in 1988 averaged 11 days, whereas in 1994, ALOS averaged 9 days (r2=0.118;P