Search

The current reality of primary care (PC) makes it essential to have telemedicine systems available to facilitate communication between care levels. Communities of practice have great potential in terms of care and education, and that is why the Online Communication Tool between Primary and Hospital Care was created. This tool enables PC and non-GP specialist care (SC) professionals to raise clinical cases for consultation and to share information. The objective of this article is to explore healthcare professionals' views on communities of clinical practice (CoCPs) and the changes that need to be made in an uncontrolled real-life setting after more than two years of use.A descriptive-interpretative qualitative study was conducted on a total of 29 healthcare professionals who were users and non-users of a CoCP using 2 focus groups, 3 triangular groups and 5 individual interviews. There were 18 women, 21 physicians and 8 nurses. Of the interviewees, 21 were PC professionals, 24 were users of a CoCP and 7 held managerial positions.For a system of communication between PC and SC to become a tool that is habitually used and very useful, the interviewees considered that it would have to be able to find quick, effective solutions to the queries raised, based on up-to-date information that is directly applicable to daily clinical practice. Contact should be virtual - and probably collaborative - via a platform integrated into their habitual workstations and led by PC professionals. Organisational changes should be implemented to enable users to have more time in their working day to spend on the tool, and professionals should have a proactive attitude in order to make the most if its potential. It is also important to make certain technological changes, basically aimed at improving the tool's accessibility, by integrating it into habitual clinical workstations.The collaborative tool that provides reliable, up-to-date information that is highly transferrable to clinical practice is valued for its effectiveness, efficiency and educational capacity. In order to make the most of its potential in terms of care and education, organisational changes and techniques are required to foster greater use.

Background A community of clinical practice called the Online Communication Tool between Primary and Hospital Care (ECOPIH) was created to enable primary care and specialist care professionals to communicate with each other in order to resolve real clinical cases, thereby improving communication and coordination between care levels. The present work seeks to analyse whether ECOPIH makes it possible to reduce the number of referrals. To that end, the objectives are: (1) To find out the degree of loyalty among ECOPIH users, by comparing the medical professionals’ profiles in the tool’s implementation phase to those in its consolidation phase. (2) To evaluate the degree of fulfilment of users’ expectations, by establishing the determining factors that had an influence on the physicians’ intention to use ECOPIH in the implementation phase and observing whether its use had an effective, direct impact on the number of patient referrals that primary care physicians made to specialist care professionals. Methods Two studies were conducted. Based on a survey of all the physicians in a Primary Care area, Study 1 was a descriptive study in ECOPIH’s implementation phase. Study 2 was a randomised intervention study of ECOPIH users in the tool’s consolidation phase. The results from both studies were compared. Various bivariate and multivariate statistical techniques (exploratory factor analysis, cluster analysis, logistic regression analysis and ANOVA) were used in both studies, which were conducted on a sample of 111 and 178 physicians, respectively. Results We confirmed the existence of an ECOPIH user profile stable across both phases: under-50-year-old women. Regarding the second objective, there were two particular findings. First, the discriminant factors that had an influence on greater ECOPIH use were habitual Social media website and app use and Perceived usefulness for reducing costs. Second, PC professionals who were ECOPIH members made fewer referrals to SC professionals in Cardiology, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology than older PC professionals who were not ECOPIH members. Conclusions The use of a community of clinical practice by primary care and specialist care professionals helps to reduce the number of referrals among medical professionals.

Following publication of the original article [1], in order to comply with the current regulations for the submission of Doctoral Thesis by compendium of articles, the Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona Doctoral School asks us to update the affiliation number 3, adding “Departament de Medicina” at the beginning, as follows

Background The current reality of primary care (PC) makes it essential to have telemedicine systems available to facilitate communication between care levels. Communities of practice have great potential in terms of care and education, and that is why the Online Communication Tool between Primary and Hospital Care was created. This tool enables PC and non-GP specialist care (SC) professionals to raise clinical cases for consultation and to share information. The objective of this article is to explore healthcare professionals’ views on communities of clinical practice (CoCPs) and the changes that need to be made in an uncontrolled real-life setting after more than two years of use. Methods A descriptive-interpretative qualitative study was conducted on a total of 29 healthcare professionals who were users and non-users of a CoCP using 2 focus groups, 3 triangular groups and 5 individual interviews. There were 18 women, 21 physicians and 8 nurses. Of the interviewees, 21 were PC professionals, 24 were users of a CoCP and 7 held managerial positions. Results For a system of communication between PC and SC to become a tool that is habitually used and very useful, the interviewees considered that it would have to be able to find quick, effective solutions to the queries raised, based on up-to-date information that is directly applicable to daily clinical practice. Contact should be virtual – and probably collaborative – via a platform integrated into their habitual workstations and led by PC professionals. Organisational changes should be implemented to enable users to have more time in their working day to spend on the tool, and professionals should have a proactive attitude in order to make the most if its potential. It is also important to make certain technological changes, basically aimed at improving the tool’s accessibility, by integrating it into habitual clinical workstations. Conclusions The collaborative tool that provides reliable, up-to-date information that is highly transferrable to clinical practice is valued for its effectiveness, efficiency and educational capacity. In order to make the most of its potential in terms of care and education, organisational changes and techniques are required to foster greater use. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-018-0739-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

ResumenObjetivoElaborar y validar un instrumento para medir aptitudes en soporte vital básico (SVB) y desfibrilación semiautomática (DSA) adaptado a los profesionales sanitarios de equipos de atención primaria. Proponer una versión actualizada y demostrar autosuficiencia del equipo para utilizarlo en evaluación formativa.DiseñoValidación de instrumentos de medida. Estudio de fiabilidad con medidas repetidas tras intervención formativa.EmplazamientoCentro de atención primaria Drassanes. Área Básica de Salud Raval Sud.ParticipantesTreinta y siete rescatadores voluntarios (total entre médicos y enfermeras), cámara profesional, médico controlador, maniquí informatizado, 6 evaluadores.IntervencionesMetodología de elaboración de test. Modelo Cardiff versión 3.1 (que se encuentra en internet). Ejecución: 2 series filmadas (una profesional y otra doméstica), de 26 a 25 simulaciones “tipo estación”, separadas por un mes. Taller formativo entre series. Evaluación retrospectiva de grabaciones DVD (6 evaluadores). Segunda serie nuevamente puntuada a las 3 semanas con ciego de versión filmada y orden aleatorizado.Mediciones principalesVariables: actuaciones categorizadas de peor a mejor ejecución. Análisis psicométrico: validez (contenido/aparente). Fiabilidad test-retest, intraobservador y sensibilidad al cambio.ResultadosRespecto al test de Cardiff (46 ítems), este test de 83 ítems contiene 38 (46%) nuevos, 34 (41%) modificados y 11 (13%) similares. La fiabilidad entre evaluadores fue excelente/buena en 51 de 62 ítems analizados; fiabilidad intraevaluador y entre filmaciones excelente/buena en todos los ítems, menos en uno; la prueba dobló la puntuación tras intervención formativa. Se propone una versión del test según las recomendaciones actuales en SVB y DSA.ConclusionesAl no disponer de instrumentos útiles para los médicos y enfermeras de atención primaria se ha elaborado uno con suficientes garantías psicométricas y se ha probado autosuficiencia evaluativa. Se propone aplicabilidad inmediata de la versión actualizada con fines de evaluación formativa.AbstractObjectiveTo prepare and validate a tool to measure Basic Life Support (BLS) and semi-automatic defibrillator (SAD) skills adapted for use by health professionals in Primary Care Teams (PCT). To propose an updated version and demonstrate self-sufficiency of the team to use it in a training evaluation.DesignValidation of measurement tools. Study of reliability with repeated measurements after a training course.SettingDrassanes Primary Care Centre. Raval Sud Basic Health Area. Barcelona. Spain.ParticipantsA total of 37 voluntary resuscitators (all doctors/nurses), professional camera, medical controller, computerised mannequin, 6 evaluators.InterventionsTest preparation methodology. Cardiff Model 3.1. Implementation: 2 filmed series (professional+domestic), of 26-25 “station type” simulations, separated by 1 month. A training workshop between series. Retrospective evaluation of DVD recordings (5 evaluators). 2nd series scored again at 3 weeks with a blind and random order filmed version.Main measurementsVariables: performances classified from worse to best execution. Psychometric analysis: Validity (content/apparent). Test-retest reliability, between-observer and sensitivity to change.ResultsCompared to the Cardiff test (46 items) our 83 item test contained 38(46%) new, 34(41%) modified and 11(13%) similar. Between-evaluator reliability, excellent/good in 51/62 items analysed; Within-evaluator and between-filming reliability, excellent/good in all except 1 item; the test score doubled after the training course. A version of the test according to BLS-SAD recommendations is proposed.ConclusionsOn there not being useful tools available for Primary Care doctors and nurses, one has been prepared with adequate psychometric guarantees and proven self-sufficient evaluation. We propose the immediate application of the updated version for training evaluation purposes.

Background, the aim of the study presented in this article is to analyse the discriminant factors that have an influence on the use of communities of practice by primary and specialist healthcare professionals (physicians and nurses) for information sharing. Obtaining evidence from an ex-ante analysis to determine what factors explain healthcare professionals' clinical community of practice use allows aspects of its use to be identified. Methods, a theoretical model based on a modified technology acceptance model was used as the analysis tool, and a discriminant analysis was performed. An ad-hoc questionnaire was designed and sent to a study population of 357 professionals from the Badalona-Sant Adrià de Besòs Primary Care Service in Catalonia, Spain, which includes nine primary care centres and three specialist care centres. The study sample was formed by the 166 healthcare professionals who responded. Results: The results revealed three main drivers for engagement in a CoP: First, for the whole sample, perceived usefulness for reducing costs associated with clinical practice was the factor with the greatest discriminant power that distinguished between users and non-users, followed by perceived usefulness for improving clinical practice quality, and lastly habitual social media website and application use. Turning to the two sub-samples of healthcare professions (physicians and nurses, respectively), we saw that the usefulness stemming from community of practice use changed. There were differences in the levels of motivation of healthcare professionals with regards to their engagement with CoP. While perceived usefulness for reducing costs associated with clinical practice was the main factor for the physicians, perceived usefulness of the Web 2.0 platform use for communication for improving clinical practice quality and perceived ease of use were the main factors for the nurses. Conclusions: In the context of communities of practice, the perception of usefulness of Web 2.0 platform use for communication is determined by organisational, technological and social factors. Specifically, the position that professionals have within the healthcare structure and particularly the closer healthcare professionals' activity is to patients and their professional experience of using social networks and ICTs are crucial to explaining the use of such platforms. Public policies promoting Web 2.0 platform use for communication should therefore go beyond the purely technological dimension and consider other professional and social determinants.

Background There has been created an online communication tool with the objective to improve the communication among different levels of care, between Primary Care clinicians and Specialists. This tool is web 2.0 based technology (ECOPIH project). It allows to review clinical cases and to share knowledge. Our study will evaluate its impact in terms of reduction on the number of referrals to three specialties two years after the use of this tool. Methods/Design Open, multicenter, controlled, non random intervention study over 24 months. Study population includes 131 Primary Care Physicians assigned to nine health centers. The study will compare the clinicians that use the ECOPIH with the ones that do not use the tool. Also, professionals that start to use the tool during the period time of the study will be included. The number of annual referrals during the first and second year will be analyzed and retrospectively compared with the previous year to the implementation of the tool. Moreover, it will be assessed the level of satisfaction of the professionals with the tool and to what extend the tool responds to their needs. Discussion The implementation of ECOPIH in the field of Primary Health Care can decrease the number of referrals from primary care to specialist care. It is expected that the reduction will be more noticeable in the group of professionals that use more intensively the tool. Furthermore, we believe that it can be also observed with the professionals that read the contributions of the others. We anticipate high degree of customer satisfaction as it is a very helpful resource never used before in our environment.

INTRODUCTION. Compliance with antidepressant treatment is a very relevant factor in the outcome of depressive disorders. Poor compliance has been associated with worse outcome, increased rate of relapses and greater cost. This study has aimed to describe adherence to antidepressant treatment in a sample of primary care patients with a diagnosis of depression in 2007. METHODS. Randomized sampling was made of patients with depression and antidepressant treatment attended in two primary care teams. Their medical records were reviewed to obtain the total number of prescriptions given to patients and the total number of prescriptions dispensed in the pharmacies. The difference between prescriptions written and collected was calculated. A difference of ± 2 was considered as good compliance. Results are shown as percentages. Comparisons were made with the chi-square, Student’s T and ANOVA tests, where appropriate. RESULTS. The simple was made up of 212 patients. Mean age was 63.2 years (SD 15.27). In the sample, 66.5% were treated with only one antidepressant and 24.1% with two. The percentage of non-compliance was 33.96% (95% CI: 25.35–40.57). Treatment-adherent patients have a lower percentage of long-term treatment with other drugs. The percentage of treatment-adherent women was higher than non-adherent (p=0.015). No differences were found in compliance among patients treated in the mental health center. CONCLUSIONS. One third of patients on antidepressant drug treatment were non-compliers because the drugs were not picked up properly from the pharmacies. We need to develop strategies to improve the therapeutic adherence of patients.