Search

OBJECTIVE: To characterize effects of alemtuzumab treatment on measures of disability improvement in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) with inadequate response (≥1 relapse) to prior therapy. METHODS: Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis (CARE-MS) II, a 2-year randomized, rater-blinded, active-controlled, head-to-head, phase 3 trial, compared efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab 12 mg with subcutaneous interferon-β-1a (SC IFN-β-1a) 44 μg in patients with RRMS. Prespecified and post hoc disability outcomes based on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), and Sloan low-contrast letter acuity (SLCLA) are reported, focusing on improvement of preexisting disability in addition to slowing of disability accumulation. RESULTS: Alemtuzumab-treated patients were more likely than SC IFN-β-1a-treated patients to show improvement in EDSS scores (p < 0.0001) on all 7 functional systems. Significantly more alemtuzumab patients demonstrated 6-month confirmed disability improvement. The likelihood of improved vs stable/worsening MSFC scores was greater with alemtuzumab than SC IFN-β-1a (p = 0.0300); improvement in MSFC scores with alemtuzumab was primarily driven by the upper limb coordination and dexterity domain. Alemtuzumab-treated patients had more favorable changes from baseline in SLCLA (2.5% contrast) scores (p = 0.0014) and MSFC + SLCLA composite scores (p = 0.0097) than SC IFN-β-1a-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RRMS and inadequate response to prior disease-modifying therapies, alemtuzumab provides greater benefits than SC IFN-β-1a across several disability outcomes, reflecting improvement of preexisting disabilities. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence (based on rater blinding and a balance in baseline characteristics between arms) that alemtuzumab modifies disability measures favorably compared with SC IFN-β-1a. clinical trial, phase iii journal article randomized controlled trial 2016 Nov 08 2016 10 12 imported

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains one of the most common infections after solid organ transplantation, resulting in significant morbidity, graft loss, and occasional mortality. Management of CMV varies considerably among transplant centers. A panel of experts on CMV and solid organ transplant was convened by The Infectious Diseases Section of The Transplantation Society to develop evidence and expert opinion-based consensus guidelines on CMV management including diagnostics, immunology, prevention, treatment, drug resistance, and pediatric issues.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes considerable morbidity and mortality in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. Several prophylactic strategies against CMV have been studied in solid organ transplant recipients, including cytomegalovirus immune globulin (CMVIG). We examined the effect of CMVIG prophylaxis on first-year and long-term survival after liver transplantation. Data were analysed for 162 OLT recipients from four transplant centers in Boston who participated in two CMVIG prophylaxis trials. Ninety patients received CMVIG (median follow-up 5.6 yr), and 72 patients received placebo (median follow-up 5.4 yr). CMVIG prophylaxis was shown to be associated with increased first-year (86% vs. 72%, p = 0.029) and long-term (68% vs. 54%, p = 0.055) survival. The distribution of baseline characteristics including donor and recipient demographics, donor CMV serostatus, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status, pre-transplant renal and liver function tests, transplantation surgical time, number of units of blood products administered during transplantation, primary immunosuppressive regimen, use of solumedrol or antilymphocyte therapy for induction of immunosuppression or treatment of rejection, and surgical complications was similar for CMVIG and placebo recipients. CMVIG recipients were more likely to have primary biliary cirrhosis than placebo recipients (21% vs. 8%, p = 0.025). Using a Cox proportional hazards multivariate model to control for pre-transplant liver disease, CMVIG was shown to be independently associated with increased first-year survival (p = 0.042); a trend toward association with increased long-term survival (p = 0.098) was also shown. These data support that CMVIG prophylaxis, beyond its proven efficacy in decreasing the incidence of severe CMV-associated disease, is associated with increased survival when used prophylactically in OLT recipients.

The role of markers of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, such as the isolation of CMV, the presence of CMV antigenemia, or detection of viral DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, as predictors of subsequent CMV disease has been examined in recent studies. We studied the value of performing surveillance cultures of blood, urine, and throat specimens in a cohort of 156 liver transplant recipients who had participated in clinical trials and had received ganciclovir only for documented CMV disease. Cultures of urine and throat specimens for detection of CMV were performed every week, and cultures of blood specimens were performed every other week for the first 2 months after transplantation, then monthly for 6 months. Eighty-nine (57%) of 156 patients developed CMV infection, 41 (46%) of whom developed clinical CMV disease (36 had organ involvement and five had CMV syndrome). Fifty (32%) of 156 patients had positive blood cultures, 35 (22%) had positive urine cultures, and 41 (26%) had positive throat cultures. The positive and negative predictive values of surveillance cultures for predicting CMV disease were as follows: blood cultures, 46% and 83%, respectively; urine cultures, 26% and 74%, respectively; and throat cultures, 32% and 76%, respectively. These data indicate that such cultures are not useful in predicting CMV disease in liver transplant recipients. Future studies should examine the value of alternative markers, such as CMV antigenemia or the detection of viral DNA by PCR, for predicting CMV disease in this setting.

To define predictors of bacteremia and to assess the potential role of exposure to cytomegalovirus (CMV) as a risk factor for bacteremia in liver transplant recipients, an intention-to-treat analysis of data for 146 orthotopic liver transplant recipients who participated in a multicenter, randomized, intervention trial was undertaken. Fifty-eight episodes of bacteremia occurred in 40 (27.4%) of 146 patients within 1 year after transplantation. Bacteremia was diagnosed a median of 39.5 days (range, 1-325 days) after transplantation. One-year mortality rates were higher among patients with bacteremia than among those without bacteremia (47.5% [19 of 40] vs. 18% [19 of 106], respectively; P = .001). A time-dependent multivariate analysis of variables that were significantly (Por = .05) associated with bacteremia in the univariate analysis showed that donor CMV seropositivity (relative risk [RR], 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-6.6; P = .0005), age of younger than 16 years (RR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-5.2; P.0059), and a major abdominal operation after transplantation excluding retransplantation (RR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.8-8.0; P = .0004) were independently associated with bacteremia. These epidemiologic data suggest that exposure to CMV from the donated organ is an independent risk factor for bacteremia in orthotopic liver transplant recipients.

Primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in liver transplant recipients generally occurs following transmission via a CMV-seropositive donor organ. Occasionally primary infection arises in recipients of CMV-seronegative donor organs through blood transfusions. We studied the differences in clinical manifestations of primary CMV infection associated with these two modes of transmission, among 40 liver transplant recipients who had documented primary CMV infection post-transplantation. Thirty-one of 40 patients received a CMV-seropositive donor organ; CMV infection in the other nine patients was transfusion related. Symptomatic CMV disease (22 of 31 vs. 4 of 9; P = .06), CMV hepatitis (20 of 31 vs. 1 of 9; P = .007), invasive fungal disease (13 of 31 vs. 0 of 9; P = .03), and death (16 of 31 vs. 1 of 9; P = .06) were more likely to occur in patients with donor organ-associated primary CMV infection. The incubation period between transplantation and onset of CMV infection, a possible marker for viral load, was shorter in recipients of donor organ-transmitted CMV infection (median, 44 vs. 137 days; P = .004). Controlling for potential confounders such as immunosuppression did not alter these associations. Primary CMV infection associated with the donor organ has a more profound impact than primary infection associated with transfusion. These differences may be due to dissimilarities in the viral load associated with donated livers and transfused blood products.

A national survey of Bacteroides fragilis group was continued in 1989 for the ninth consecutive year. Seven hundred thirty-nine isolates of B fragilis group from eight centers were tested for susceptibility to 14 antimicrobials. Sulbactam and clavulanic acid, beta-lactamase inhibitors, were tested at a constant concentration of 8 micrograms/ml and 2 micrograms/ml, respectively. Sulbactam was also tested in a fixed ratio of 1:2. Imipenem, ampicillin+sulbactam, and ticarcillin+clavulanic acid had resistance of less than 1% at breakpoints of 8 micrograms/ml, 16 micrograms/ml, and 64 micrograms/ml, respectively. At 32 micrograms/ml, resistance to cefoxitin, cefotetan, ceftizoxime, and ceftriaxone were 4%, 25%, 26%, and 46%, respectively. Clindamycin resistance was 10% at a breakpoint of 4 micrograms/ml. No isolates were resistant to chloramphenicol or metronidazole. Resistance for five B fragilis species to cefoxitin, ceftizoxime, and cefotetan varied greatly among both species and participating institutions. The addition of a beta-lactamase inhibitor increased the potency of the beta-lactam drugs tested as combinations. This finding suggests that beta-lactamase production is the major resistance factor in members of the B fragilis group.