Search

Infiltrating tumor border configuration (ITBC) portends a poor prognosis compared with pushing tumor border configuration (PTBC) in colorectal cancer. The tumor and its surrounding immune microenvironment of tumor border configuration is not well-characterized. We aim to elucidate the differences in expression of molecular markers between the 2 groups using tissue microarray (TMA).Immunohistochemistry was performed on TMAs of surgical pathology specimens obtained from colorectal cancer patients consecutively operated at our institution from 2004 to 2015. TMAs were stained for immune cells (CD8, FOXP3, LAG3, PU1, CD163, and PDL1); HLA II, beta 2 microglobulin, and HC10 on tumor cells; BRAFV600E mutation; and DNA mismatch repair proteins (MMR) status. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded.There were 646 tumors with ITBC and 310 tumors with PTBC. There was a significantly lower expression (p0.05) of immune components, namely CD8, FOXP3, LAG3, PU1, PDL1 immune cells, and Beta-2 Microglobulin on tumor cells in the tumors with ITBC compared with PTBC, except CD163 immune cells, and HC10 and HLAII on tumor cells. Tumors with ITBC were less likely to be associated with BRAFV600E mutations and deficient MMR proteins (p0.001). On analyzing MMR-proficient tumors separately, we could not find any difference in the expression of any molecular marker (including BRAF), except a lower expression of PDL1 immune cells in tumors with ITBC (p0.001).Colorectal tumors with ITBC are associated with a generalized low immune microenvironment and low rates of BRAFV600E mutation compared with tumors with PTBC. However, the molecular expression of tumor border configuration seems confounded by the MMR molecular signature. MMR-proficient colorectal tumors with ITBC are associated with a lower expression of only PDL1 immune cells among all immune markers examined.

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells is a significant prognostic biomarker for a number of malignancies, although less is known about the significance of PD-L1 positive immune cells in colon carcinoma. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of PD-L1 in a large cohort of colon carcinomas to identify patterns of PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment and its correlation with other key immune subsets to better understand the impact of these immune cells. We assessed 1218 colon carcinomas on representative tissue microarray sections, gathered relevant clinicopathologic information, and performed immunohistochemical staining for mismatch repair proteins, CD8, CD163, LAG3, PD-L1, FoxP3, and BRAF V600E. We then performed automated quantification; manual quantification was used for PD-L1 tumor cells and immune cells. Dual PD-L1/PU.1 immunostain was also performed. The majority of PD-L1 positive cells expressed PU.1 thus representing tumor-associated macrophages. Based on the median number of PD-L1 positive immune cells (7.6/mm

Overexpression of repetitive elements is an emerging hallmark of human cancers1. Diverse repeats can mimic viruses by replicating within the cancer genome through retrotransposition, or presenting pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) to the pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) of the innate immune system2–5. Yet, how specific repeats affect tumor evolution and shape the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) in a pro- or anti-tumorigenic manner remains poorly defined. Here, we integrate whole genome and total transcriptome data from a unique autopsy cohort of multiregional samples collected in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients, into a comprehensive evolutionary analysis. We find that more recently evolvedShortInterspersedNuclearElements (SINE), a family of retrotransposable repeats, are more likely to form immunostimulatory double-strand RNAs (dsRNAs). Consequently, younger SINEs are strongly co-regulated with RIG-I like receptor associated type-I interferon genes but anti-correlated with pro-tumorigenic macrophage infiltration. We discover that immunostimulatory SINE expression in tumors is regulated by eitherLongInterspersedNuclearElements 1 (LINE1/L1) mobility or ADAR1 activity in aTP53mutation dependent manner. Moreover, L1 retrotransposition activity tracks with tumor evolution and is associated withTP53mutation status. Altogether, our results suggest pancreatic tumors actively evolve to modulate immunogenic SINE stress and induce pro-tumorigenic inflammation. Our integrative, evolutionary analysis therefore illustrates, for the first time, how dark matter genomic repeats enable tumors to co-evolve with the TME by actively regulating viral mimicry to their selective advantage.

Altered RNA expression of repetitive sequences and retrotransposition are frequently seen in colorectal cancer, implicating a functional importance of repeat activity in cancer progression. We show the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor 3TC targets activities of these repeat elements in colorectal cancer preclinical models with a preferential effect in p53-mutant cell lines linked with direct binding of p53 to repeat elements. We translate these findings to a human phase II trial of single-agent 3TC treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer with demonstration of clinical benefit in 9 of 32 patients. Analysis of 3TC effects on colorectal cancer tumorspheres demonstrates accumulation of immunogenic RNA:DNA hybrids linked with induction of interferon response genes and DNA damage response. Epigenetic and DNA-damaging agents induce repeat RNAs and have enhanced cytotoxicity with 3TC. These findings identify a vulnerability in colorectal cancer by targeting the viral mimicry of repeat elements.Significance:Colorectal cancers express abundant repeat elements that have a viral-like life cycle that can be therapeutically targeted with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) commonly used for viral diseases. NRTIs induce DNA damage and interferon response that provide a new anticancer therapeutic strategy.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1397

Supplementary Figure from Reverse Transcriptase Inhibition Disrupts Repeat Element Life Cycle in Colorectal Cancer

Supplementary Data from Reverse Transcriptase Inhibition Disrupts Repeat Element Life Cycle in Colorectal Cancer

PDF file - 110K, Supplemental Tables. (S1) Clinical characteristics and CTC data for metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with hormonal therapy. (S2) Time course data for metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with hormonal therapy and analyzed for AR signaling in CTCs.

Figure S3. Illustration of modeling and correcting for dependence of each marker through the expression level of housekeeping genes.

Supplementary Table S1: Patients and clinical information. Supplementary Table S2: Genes used to determine the AR signature.

Primer sequences

Table S3

Supplementary Table S1. Genes tested for Prostate CTC digital PCR Assay; Supplementary Table S2. Clinical information for prostate cancer patients and healthy donor subjects; Supplementary Table S3. Clinical information for patients enrolled on prospective trial of first-line abiraterone for mCRPC; Supplementary Table S4. Clinical information for patients with localized prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy study; Supplementary Table S5. Droplet digital PCR primers used in this study.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figure S1. (A) Schematic of d-CTC assay. Whole blood is processed using the CTC-iChip, resulting in a bulk product highly enriched for intact CTCs (labeled green) but also contains WBCs (labeled red) and RBCs (unlabeled); Supplementary Figure S2. Graphs showing droplet digital PCR signal for each gene in 12 metastatic prostate cancer patients compared to 34 healthy male control subjects; Supplementary Figure S3. (A, B) Graphs of relationships between Prostate CTCM Score and serum PSA, and CTC droplet digital PCR KLK3 signal and serum PSA at the pre-treatment time point; Supplementary Figure S4. (A) Kaplan-Meier curves for radiographic progression-free survival (R-PFS) by CTC HOXB13 status at pretreatment; Supplementary Figure S5. (A) Heatmap of droplet digital PCR CTC signal after whole transcriptome amplification for blood samples from healthy donor controls arranged by sex and age, and from patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, arranged by D'Amico Risk Group; Supplementary Figure S6. (A) Box plots showing pre-operative leave-one-out cross validated (LOOCV) CTCL Score in clinically localized prostate cancer patients according to microscopic SVI or pelvic LN involvement identified at the time of radical prostatectomy

Supplementary Figures and Legends

ATP-competitive fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) kinase inhibitors, including BGJ398 and Debio 1347, show antitumor activity in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) harboring activating FGFR2 gene fusions. Unfortunately, acquired resistance develops and is often associated with the emergence of secondary FGFR2 kinase domain mutations. Here, we report that the irreversible pan-FGFR inhibitor TAS-120 demonstrated efficacy in 4 patients with FGFR2 fusion–positive ICC who developed resistance to BGJ398 or Debio 1347. Examination of serial biopsies, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and patient-derived ICC cells revealed that TAS-120 was active against multiple FGFR2 mutations conferring resistance to BGJ398 or Debio 1347. Functional assessment and modeling the clonal outgrowth of individual resistance mutations from polyclonal cell pools mirrored the resistance profiles observed clinically for each inhibitor. Our findings suggest that strategic sequencing of FGFR inhibitors, guided by serial biopsy and ctDNA analysis, may prolong the duration of benefit from FGFR inhibition in patients with FGFR2 fusion–positive ICC.Significance:ATP-competitive FGFR inhibitors (BGJ398, Debio 1347) show efficacy in FGFR2-altered ICC; however, acquired FGFR2 kinase domain mutations cause drug resistance and tumor progression. We demonstrate that the irreversible FGFR inhibitor TAS-120 provides clinical benefit in patients with resistance to BGJ398 or Debio 1347 and overcomes several FGFR2 mutations in ICC models.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 983

Supplementary Figure S1: RNA sequencing and pathway analysis of CTCs from Bone(+) versus Visceral(+) breast cancer patients. Supplementary Figure S2: Correlation between AR expression and AR signatures. Supplementary Figure S3: ER and PR expression in CTCs from Bone(+) versus Visceral(+) breast cancer patients. Supplementary Figure S4: AR antibody validation. Supplementary Figure S5: AR copy number assessment in breast cancer bone metastasis. Supplementary Figure S6: ER and PR expression in primary and metastatic breast cancer. Supplementary Figure S7: AR expression correlates with bone metastasis independently of ER status. Supplementary Figure S8: Enzalutamide treatment induces downregulation of a subset of AR-dependent genes in breast cancer cells. Supplementary Figure S9: AR shRNA validation. Supplementary Figure S10: AR inhibition does not alter primary tumor growth.

Supplemental Methods, Tables S1-2, Table Legends and Figure Legends Table S1.List of qRT-PCR primers used for epithelial, mesenchymal, inducer and housekeeping genes. Table S2. RNA-ISH quantitation of expression scores used in Figure 5.

PDF file - 49K, Supplemental Methods for (a) single molecule sequencing and AR transcriptional signature, (b) HB CTC-chip fabrication, (c) HB CTC-chip blood processing, and (d) automated fluorescence microscopy.

Purpose:Selective FGFR inhibitors are effective against cholangiocarcinomas that harbor gene alterations in FGFR2. Clinical trials suggest that expression of wild-type FGFR mRNA can predict sensitivity to FGFR inhibitors, but this biomarker has not been well characterized in cholangiocarcinoma. This study explores the prevalence of FGFR mRNA overexpression in cholangiocarcinoma, its role in predicting sensitivity to FGFR inhibitors, and its association with immune markers.Experimental Design:Tissue microarrays of intrahepatic (ICC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ECC) resected between 2004 and 2015 were used to evaluate FGFR1–4 mRNA expression levels by RNA in situ hybridization (ISH). Expression levels of FGFR2 mRNA were correlated with FGFR2 fusion status and with patient outcomes. Immune markers expression was assessed by IHC and CSF1 and CSF1 receptor expression were examined by RNA ISH.Results:Among 94 patients with resected cholangiocarcinoma, the majority had ICC (77%). FGFR2 fusions were identified in 23% of ICCs and 5% of ECCs. High levels of FGFR mRNA in FGFR2 fusion–negative ICC/ECC were seen for: FGFR1 (ICC/ECC: 15%/0%), FGFR2 (ICC/ECC: 57%/0%), FGFR3 (ICC/ECC: 53%/18%), and FGFR4 (ICC/ECC: 32%/0%). Overall, 62% of fusion-negative cholangiocarcinomas showed high levels of FGFR mRNA. In patients with advanced FGFR2 fusion–positive ICC, high levels of FGFR2 mRNA did not correlate with clinical benefit. FGFR2 fusion–positive tumors showed a paucity of PD-L1 on tumor cells.Conclusions:FGFR mRNA overexpression occurs frequently in cholangiocarcinoma in the absence of genetic alterations in FGFR. This study identifies a molecular subpopulation in cholangiocarcinoma for which further investigation of FGFR inhibitors is merited outside currently approved indications.

Purpose:Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) lethality is multifactorial; although studies have identified transcriptional and genetic subsets of tumors with different prognostic significance, there is limited understanding of features associated with the minority of patients who have durable remission after surgical resection. In this study, we performed laser capture microdissection (LCM) of PDAC samples to define their cancer- and stroma-specific molecular subtypes and identify a prognostic gene expression signature for short-term and long-term survival.Experimental Design:LCM and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis of cancer and adjacent stroma of 19 treatment-naïve PDAC tumors was performed. Gene expression signatures were tested for their robustness in a large independent validation set. An RNA-ISH assay with pooled probes for genes associated with disease-free survival (DFS) was developed to probe 111 PDAC tumor samples.Results:Gene expression profiling identified four subtypes of cancer cells (C1–C4) and three subtypes of cancer-adjacent stroma (S1–S3). These stroma-specific subtypes were associated with DFS (P = 5.55E-07), with S1 associated with better prognoses when paired with C1 and C2. Thirteen genes were found to be predominantly expressed in cancer cells and corresponded with DFS in a validation using existing RNA-seq datasets. A second validation on an independent cohort of patients using RNA-ISH probes to six of these prognostic genes demonstrated significant association with overall survival (median 17 vs. 25 months; P < 0.02).Conclusions:Our results identified specific signatures from the epithelial and the stroma components of PDAC, which add clarity to the nature of PDAC molecular subtypes and may help predict survival.

Purpose:Patient-derived organoids (PDO) are a promising technology to support precision medicine initiatives for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PDOs may improve clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) and enable rapid ex vivo chemotherapeutic screening (pharmacotyping).Experimental Design:PDOs were derived from tissues obtained during surgical resection and endoscopic biopsies and studied with NGS and pharmacotyping. PDO-specific pharmacotype is assessed prospectively as a predictive biomarker of clinical therapeutic response by leveraging data from a randomized controlled clinical trial.Results:Clinical sequencing pipelines often fail to detect PDAC-associated somatic mutations in surgical specimens that demonstrate a good pathologic response to previously administered chemotherapy. Sequencing the PDOs derived from these surgical specimens, after biomass expansion, improves the detection of somatic mutations and enables quantification of copy number variants. The detection of clinically relevant mutations and structural variants is improved following PDO biomass expansion. On clinical trial, PDOs were derived from biopsies of treatment-naïve patients prior to treatment with FOLFIRINOX (FFX). Ex vivo PDO pharmacotyping with FFX components predicted clinical therapeutic response in these patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced PDAC treated in a neoadjuvant or induction paradigm. PDO pharmacotypes suggesting sensitivity to FFX components were associated with longitudinal declines of tumor marker, carbohydrate-antigen 19–9 (CA-19–9), and favorable RECIST imaging response.Conclusions:PDOs established from tissues obtained from patients previously receiving cytotoxic chemotherapies can be accomplished in a clinically certified laboratory. Sequencing PDOs following biomass expansion improves clinical sequencing quality. High in vitro sensitivity to standard-of-care chemotherapeutics predicts good clinical response to systemic chemotherapy in PDAC.See related commentary by Zhang et al., p. 3176

Supplementary Figure from Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer: Patient-Derived Organoid Pharmacotyping Is a Predictive Biomarker of Clinical Treatment Response

Supplementary Table from Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer: Patient-Derived Organoid Pharmacotyping Is a Predictive Biomarker of Clinical Treatment Response

Purpose: More effective therapy is needed for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The encouraging clinical results obtained with checkpoint molecule-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAb) have prompted us to investigate whether this type of immunotherapy may be applicable to ICC. The aims of this study were to determine whether (i) patients mount a T-cell immune response to their ICC, (ii) checkpoint molecules are expressed on both T cells and tumor cells, and (iii) tumor cells are susceptible to recognition by cognate T cells.Experimental Design: Twenty-seven ICC tumors were analyzed for (i) lymphocyte infiltrate, (ii) HLA class I and HLA class II expression, and (iii) PD-1 and PD-L1 expression by T cells and ICC cells, respectively. The results of this analysis were correlated with the clinicopathologic characteristics of the patients investigated.Results: Lymphocyte infiltrates were identified in all tumors. PD-L1 expression and HLA class I antigen expression by ICC cells was observed in 8 and 11, respectively, of the 27 tumors analyzed. HLA class I antigen expression correlated with CD8+ T-cell infiltrate. Furthermore, positive HLA class I antigen expression in combination with negative/rare PD-L1 expression was associated with favorable clinical course of the disease.Conclusions: ICC patients are likely to mount a T-cell immune response against their own tumors. Defects in HLA class I antigen expression in combination with PD-L1 expression by ICC cells provide them with an immune escape mechanism. This mechanism justifies the implementation of immunotherapy with checkpoint molecule-specific mAbs in patients bearing ICC tumors without defects in HLA class I antigen expression. Clin Cancer Res; 22(2); 470–8. ©2015 AACR.

Detailed methods for sample preparation and RNA seqeucning

Figure S2. Representative staining patterns of formalin-fixed, paraffinembedded primary ICC lesions with HLA-DR, DQ and DP β chain-specific mAb LGII- 612.14.

Figures S1-S6