Search

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of 2D conventional brachytherapy (CBT) compared to 3D MRI-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) with and without the use of interstitial needles on local control, overall survival, and toxicity in patients treated for cervical cancer with radiation or chemoradiation. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of biopsy-proven FIGO IB-IVA cervical cancer patients, treated with primary radiation or chemoradiation, followed by brachytherapy (BT) between January 1997 and July 2016. Endpoints were local control, overall survival, and toxicity. Results: Of 126 patients included, 35 have been treated with CBT, 31 with IGBT without needles (IC), and 60 with IGBT with needles (ICIS). External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) had mostly been delivered concurrently with chemotherapy (weekly cisplatin). Overall local control was 93% after 1 year, and 88% after 3 years. Overall 3-year survival was 75%, and 5-year survival was 66%. The 3D technique (IGBT cohorts) showed a trend for an improved local control and overall survival (p = 0.05) compared to the 2D technique (CBT cohort). A decrease in toxicity was observed from 17% (2D cohort) to 12% (3D cohort). The use of interstitial needles was associated with a higher high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) dose (11.3 Gy vs. 9.9 Gy) and a lower D2cc bladder dose (10.9 Gy vs. 14.7 Gy, both p < 0.01). Conclusions: In cervical cancer treatment, the use of a 3D brachytherapy technique (MRI-guided with or without interstitial needles) showed a trend towards an increased local control and improved overall survival with reduced toxicity, compared to the conventional 2D brachytherapy technique. The use of interstitial needles allowed dose sculpting, resulting in delivery of higher doses to the HR-CTV, while reducing radiation doses to organs at risk, such as the bladder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cognitive decline is an arising concern in patients who need cranial irradiation. We used the pooled longitudinal individual patient data of two phase III trials: NCT01780675 and PREMER to investigate whether hippocampal avoidance (HA)-PCI is associated with improved self-reported cognitive functioning (SRCF) compared with PCI without increasing brain metastases (BM) development within the HA area., Methods: Patients with stage I-IV small cell lung cancer (SCLC) were randomized to PCI or HA-PCI. SRCF was assessed and contrast enhanced brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at baseline and up to 24 months follow-up. SRCF and BM incidence after (HA)-PCI were compared between arms. Self reported cognitive impairment was defined as SCRF < 75., Results: In total, 318 patients were randomized. Longitudinal generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis showed that HA-PCI neither had a significant impact on SRCF (β = 1.41, p = 0.52) nor on cognitive impairment (OR 0.81, 95 %CI 0.53-1.25, p = 0.34). The median follow up was 41.7 (95 %CI 35.7-47.6) months, during which 61 patients developed BM (PCI arm: 30, HA-PCI arm: 31, p = 0.9). BM site was solitary in 15 patients (PCI arm: 7, HA-PCI arm: 8, p = 0.8). Nine of the 61 patients had BM within the HA area (PCI arm: 4, HA-PCI arm: 5, p = 1.0). The BM incidence was not significantly different between arms (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.03, 95 %CI 0.62-1.70, p = 0.91)., Conclusion: HA-PCI did not preserve longitudinal SRCF but did also not increase the risk of BM. Additional strategies should be investigated to further improve the therapeutic ratio of PCI., Trials Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01780675) ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02397733)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: N Rodríguez de Dios: Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca Spain. Speakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca Spain, Siemens Healthineers. F Couñago: Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Astellas Pharma. L Hendriks: No related COI. Outside of this manuscript personal fees as an invited speaker from Benecke, Medtalks and VJOncology; personal fees for participation in mentorship programme funded by AstraZeneca; personal fees for travel support from Roche; personal fees as member of the committee that revised the Dutch guidelines on NSCLC, brain metastases and leptomeningeal metastases; fees paid to her institution for an educational webinar from Janssen; fees paid to her institution for advisory board membership from Amgen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Takeda; fees paid to her institution as an invited speaker from AstraZeneca, Bayer, high5oncology, Lilly and Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD); fees paid to her institution for interview sessions from Roche; fees paid to her institution for podcast appearance from Takeda; institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Takeda, Merck and Pfizer (Novartis under negotiation); institutional funding as a local principal investigator (PI) from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Merck Serono, Mirati, MSD, Novartis, Roche and Takeda; non-remunerated roles as chair for metastatic NSCLC of the lung cancer group for EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) and as the secretary of the studies foundation for NVALT (Nederlandse Vereniging van Artsen voor Longziekten en Tuberculose). The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Comparative studies of the overall survival (OS) in elderly patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have been limited by mixed extents of resection and different surgical approaches.792 patients aged ≥65 years with clinical stage I NSCLC underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy or SBRT between 2010 and 2015. The propensity score-matched primary analysis included data from the full cohort; the secondary analysis included data from a subgroup of patients with data on pulmonary function.Median OS for unmatched patients was 77 months for patients undergoing VATS lobectomy and 38 months for SBRT. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates after VATS lobectomy were 92%, 76% and 65%, and after SBRT were 90%, 52% and 29% (p<0.001). Median OS for matched patients in the primary analysis was 77 months for patients undergoing VATS lobectomy and 33 months for SBRT. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates after VATS lobectomy were 91%, 68% and 58%, and after SBRT were 87%, 46% and 29% (p<0.001). The survival advantage with VATS lobectomy persisted in the secondary analysis after adjusting for non-matched variables (p=0.034).We suggest that elderly patients with stage I NSCLC undergoing VATS lobectomy have a better rate of OS than patients undergoing SBRT, irrespective of matching. This could be clinically important in decision-making for elderly patients who can tolerate surgery., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: D.D.E.M.A. Detillon has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.J. Aarts has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: K. De Jaeger has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C.H.J. Van Eijck has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E.J. Veen has nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©ERS 2019.)