Gonny Beugelsdijk, Hepie Henstra, Aurora M Ulgiati, Anne-Sophie Rebillat, Roelie Fopma, Graziano Onder, Silvia Sacco, Marloes Hermelink, Anneke Loonstra-de Jong, Alain D. Dekker, Mieke Schippers, Liesbeth Willems, Lisa de Ruiter, Debby Van Dam, Marjo Oosterik, Ségolène Falquero, Antonella Di Paola, Martine Scholten-Kuiper, Antonia M. W. Coppus, Henk Groen, Juan Fortea, Marleen Tollenaere, Sílvia Valldeneu, Bessy Benejam, Peter Paul De Deyn, Judith Willink-Vos, Angelo Carfì, Vincent A. Boxelaar, Value, Affordability and Sustainability (VALUE), Reproductive Origins of Adult Health and Disease (ROAHD), and Molecular Neuroscience and Ageing Research (MOLAR)
Altres ajuts: Research School Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences (RUG/UMCG); Gratama Stichting/Stichting Groninger Universiteitsfonds (2015-04); Research Foundation Flanders (G053218N); Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER); National Institutes of Health (NIA grants 1R01AG056850-01A1, R21AG056974, R01AG061566); Fundació La Marató de TV3 (20141210); Fundació Catalana Síndrome de Down; Fundació Víctor Grífols i Lucas; Generalitat de Catalunya (SLT006/17/00119). Background: People with Down syndrome (DS) are at high risk to develop Alzheimer's disease dementia (AD). Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are common and may also serve as early signals for dementia. However, comprehensive evaluation scales for BPSD, adapted to DS, are lacking. Therefore, we previously developed the BPSD-DS scale to identify behavioral changes between the last six months and pre-existing life-long characteristic behavior. Objective: To optimize and further study the scale (discriminative ability and reliability) in a large representative DS study population. Methods: Optimization was based on item irrelevance and clinical experiences obtained in the initial study. Using the shortened and refined BPSD-DS II, informant interviews were conducted to evaluate 524 individuals with DS grouped according to dementia status: no dementia (DS, N = 292), questionable dementia (DS + Q, N = 119), and clinically diagnosed dementia (DS + AD, N = 113). Results: Comparing item change scores between groups revealed prominent changes in frequency and severity for anxious, sleep-related, irritable, restless/stereotypic, apathetic, depressive, and eating/drinking behavior. For most items, the proportion of individuals displaying an increased frequency was highest in DS + AD, intermediate in DS + Q, and lowest in DS. For various items within sections about anxious, sleep-related, irritable, apathetic, and depressive behaviors, the proportion of individuals showing an increased frequency was already substantial in DS + Q, suggesting that these changes may serve as early signals of AD in DS. Reliability data were promising. Conclusion: The optimized scale yields largely similar results as obtained with the initial version. Systematically evaluating BPSD in DS may increase understanding of changes among caregivers and (timely) adaptation of care/treatment.