Search

Background The ideal surgical treatment of lumbar canal stenosis remains controversial. Although decompressive open surgery has been widely used with good clinical outcome, minimally invasive indirect decompression techniques have been developed to avoid the complications associated with open approaches. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiologic outcome and safety of the indirect decompression achieved with stand-alone percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative pathologies. Methods Twenty-eight patients presenting with spinal degenerative diseases including concomitant central and/or lateral stenosis were treated with stand-alone percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Radiographic measurements were made on axial and sagittal magnetic resonance (MR) images, performed before surgery and after a mean follow-up period of 25.2 months. Measurements included spinal canal and foraminal areas, and anteroposterior canal diameter. Results Percutaneous screw fixation was performed in 35 spinal levels. Measurements on the follow-up MR images showed statistically significant increase in the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal and the neural foramen, from a mean of 88.22 and 61.05 mm 2 preoperatively to 141.52 and 92.18 mm 2 at final follow-up, respectively. The sagittal central canal diameter increased from a mean of 4.9 to 9.1 mm at final follow-up. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) both improved significantly after surgery (p < 0.0001). Conclusion Stand-alone percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is a safe and effective technique for indirect decompression of the spinal canal and neural foramina in lumbar degenerative diseases. This minimally invasive technique may provide the necessary decompression in cases of common degenerative lumbar disorders with ligamentous stenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Following spinal fixation, postoperative imaging is routinely performed. The value of routine postoperative imaging and its impact on the surgical decision remains uncertain, especially in degenerative cases. Moreover, routine postoperative imaging is not free and is an ionizing radiation. This study investigated the value of postoperative imaging after uneventful uncomplicated elective posterior lumbar fixation. Methods: This case series retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent elective posterior lumbar fixation surgeries at our institution within two years. A series of 98 cases met our selection criteria. Their mean age was 51.2 years. We reviewed the decisions taken after performing the routine postoperative images. We searched for further diagnostic or imaging studies, revision surgery, or an extended hospital stay. Results: We found no particular decision was made after performing the postoperative imaging after uneventful uncomplicated elective posterior lumbar fixation surgeries. Moreover, there was no change in the hospital stay or the regular postoperative clinical management for all the included patients. No revision surgery was required based on the postoperative routine images. Conclusions: We found that routine postoperative imaging after posterior fixation of a degenerative lumbar spine is of limited value. A randomized, controlled study is helpful to confirm this finding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws and traditional pedicle screws in lumbar fusion. Randomized controlled studies and cohort studies on CBT versus pedicle screws in lumbar fusion were searched in China Biology Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP Database for Chinese Technical and Science Periodicals, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. The search period spanned from the establishment of the databases to December 2023. The Cochrane bias risk assessment tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were applied to assess the quality of the literature included. Clinical and imaging data as well as surgical outcomes, recovery, and postoperative complications were extracted from the relevant literature. A total of 6 randomized controlled trials and 26 cohort studies were included after screening by inclusion and exclusion criteria with a total of 2478 patients. The meta-analysis demonstrated significant discrepancies between the CBT and TPS groups in Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at 3 and 6 months and final follow-up. Moreover, the TPS group exhibited a higher Oswestry disability index at final follow-up, a greater VAS for low back pain at both 1 week and final follow-up, as well as a higher VAS for leg pain at 1 month. Differences were also noted in surgical and recovery outcomes. However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in postoperative complications. CBT and TPS have analogous safety profiles when applied to lumbar fusion, but the clinical efficacy of CBT is superior to that of TPS to some extent, and the procedure is less invasive with faster recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing transpedicular screw and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rod stabilization for the surgical treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 51 patients diagnosed with degenerative spine disease, such as recurrent disc herniation, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, and adjacent segment disease, who underwent bilateral transpedicular screw-PEEK rod stabilization between May 2017 and November 2020. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included lumbar lordosis angles, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, PROLO economic and social scores, and the presence of adjacent segments and fusion. Results: The study included 51 patients with a mean age of 62.5 years (range: 18-85 years), with 56.8% (29 patients) being female and 43.2% (22 patients) being male. Surgical procedures involved single-level stabilization in 16 patients, two-level stabilization in 21 patients, three-level stabilization in 9 patients, and four-level stabilization in 5 patients. The mean follow-up period was 52.4 months. Postoperatively, there was a significant reduction in VAS scores from a mean of 8.2±1.3 to 3.4±1.7 (p«0.01). No significant changes were observed in the lumbar lordosis angle, sacral slope, pelvic tilt angle, and pelvic incidence angle. The mean PROLO score improved from 3.5±1.2 preoperatively to 7.6±1.5 postoperatively. Fusion was observed in 43 patients during the follow-up period. Conclusion: The use of PEEK rods in the surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases may lead to improved postoperative quality of life and reduced implant-related complications. Furthermore, our findings suggest that patients without sagittal balance impairment may benefit from PEEK rod stabilization without significant changes in spinal alignment. However, further comparative and long-term studies are required to better understand the efficacy and outcomes of PEEK rod systems in this treatment approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objective To investigate the biomechanical effects of interbody cage height on adjacent segments in patients with lumbar degeneration undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery, so as to provide references for selection of interbody cage. Methods The finite element model of normal lower lumbar spine (L3–S1) was built and validated, then constructed three different degenerative segments in L3–L4, and the cages with different height (8, 10, 12, 14 mm) were implanted into L4–L5 disc. All the twelve models were loaded with pure moment of 7.5 N m to produce flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation motions on lumbar spine, and the effects of cage height on range of motion (RoM) and intervertebral pressure in lumbar spine were investigated. Results The RoM of adjacent segments and the maximum stress of intervertebral discs increased with the increase in cage height, but this trend was not obvious in mild and moderate degeneration groups. After implantation of four different height cages (8, 10, 12, 14 mm), the RoM of L3/L4 segment reached the maximum during extension. The RoM of mild degeneration group was 2.07°, 2.45°, 2.48°, 2.54°, that of moderate degeneration group was 1.79°, 1.97°, 2.05°, 2.05°, and that of severe degeneration group was 1.43°, 1.66°, 1.74°, 1.74°. The stress of L3–L4 intervertebral disc reached the maximum during flexion. The maximum stress of L3–L4 intervertebral disc was 20.16 MPa, 20.28 MPa, 20.31 MPa and 20.33 MPa in the mild group, 20.58 MPa, 20.66 MPa, 20.71 MPa and 20.75 MPa in the moderate group, and 21.27 MPa, 21.40 MPa, 21.50 MPa and 21.60 MPa in the severe group. Conclusion For patients with mild-to-moderate lumbar degenerative disease who need to undergo TLIF surgery, it is recommended that the height of fusion cage should not exceed the original intervertebral space height by 2 mm, while for patients with severe degeneration, a fusion cage close to the original intervertebral height should be selected as far as possible, and the intervertebral space should not be overstretched.

Abstract Background Adequate discectomy and endplate preparation are extremely crucial steps for spinal interbody fusion. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion MITLIF technique is safe and effective. However, concerns exist regarding sufficient disc space preparation from unilateral access. The purpose of this study, was to demonstrate our preliminary experience in objective and subjective evaluation of disc space preparation intraoperatively during endoscope-assisted MITLIF with fluoroscopy-guided, describing some of its possible advantages, and analyzing its safety and feasibility. Methods From March 2018 to July 2019, three patients with degenerative spinal stenosis with radiculopathy and instability underwent endoscope-assisted MITLIF with fluoroscopy-guided. Patients’ demographic data, clinical parameters, subsidence, and fusion were collected. Results Patients were successfully treated by endoscope-assisted MITLIF with fluoroscopy-guided at single-level or two-level. Symptoms improved postoperatively in all patients, and no complications occurred during follow-up. No cage subsidence was observed. At 6-month postoperatively, there was bony fusion observed on computed tomography in two patients. Conclusion Endoscope-assisted MITLIF with fluoroscopy-guided is a safe and feasible technique to improve visualization during discectomy and endplate preparation objectively and subjectively, possibly increasing fusion rate and early time to fusion.

Background Context: Interbody fusion, including: transforaminal (TLIF), posterior (PLIF), anterior (ALIF), and lateral (LLIF); effectively treat lumbar degenerative pathology and provide spinopelvic balance. Although the decision on surgical approach and technique are multifactorial and patient specific, the impact of the interbody approach on segmental and adjacent level lordosis could be an important factor to consider during pre-operative planning to achieve pre-specified alignment goals.Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the 6-month postoperative radiographic outcomes in the lumbar spine following 1 to 2 level transforaminal (TLIF), posterior (PLIF), anterior (ALIF), and lateral (LLIF) interbody fusions at the L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1 levels. As our primary outcome, we evaluated the change in segmental lordosis at the level of fusion in ALIF/LLIF approaches compared to TLIF/PLIF. Secondarily, we evaluated the pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch and examined the compensatory lordotic changes at the adjacent levels 6 months following surgery.Study Design: Retrospective cohort.Patient Sample: This retrospective study included 18 centers of various practice settings across the United States. Patients were included in the study if they underwent a one- or two-level primary lumbar fusion for degenerative pathology.Outcomes Measures: Measurements of the pre-operative and 6-month post-operative lumbar AP and lateral lumbar plain radiographs included: pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis from L1-S1 (LL), as well as segmental lordosis (SL) of each segment between L1-S1.Methods: Due to there being 2 evaluated time points, patients were then grouped based on alignment into categories of preserved, restored, not corrected, and worsened.Results: 474 patients underwent 608 levels of fusion. ALIF/LLIF resulted in significantly more segmental lordosis compared to TLIF/PLIF procedures at both L4-5 and L5-S1 (p<.001). Overall, ALIF/LLIF resulted in significantly more global lumbar lordotic alignment change compared to TLIF/PLIF (p=.01). Whether patients' alignment was preserved versus worsened was not significantly predicted by type of procedure. Similarly, whether patients' alignment was restored versus not corrected was not significantly predicted by type of procedure. Finally, anterior approaches resulted in decreased lordosis at adjacent levels, thus resulting in a more neutral position.Conclusion: In this large multicenter retrospective study of 1 to 2 level interbody fusion surgeries, we identified that A/LLIF procedures at L4-L5 and L5-S1 resulted in greater segmental lordosis restoration and PI-LL mismatch improvement compared to T/PLIF procedures. A/LLIF may also significantly reduce lordosis (compared to T/PLIF) at the adjacent levels in a fashion that serves to reduce the lumbar lordosis that may have been increased at the fused level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the biomechanical effects of interbody cage height on adjacent segments in patients with lumbar degeneration undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery, so as to provide references for selection of interbody cage. Methods: The finite element model of normal lower lumbar spine (L3–S1) was built and validated, then constructed three different degenerative segments in L3–L4, and the cages with different height (8, 10, 12, 14 mm) were implanted into L4–L5 disc. All the twelve models were loaded with pure moment of 7.5 N m to produce flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation motions on lumbar spine, and the effects of cage height on range of motion (RoM) and intervertebral pressure in lumbar spine were investigated. Results: The RoM of adjacent segments and the maximum stress of intervertebral discs increased with the increase in cage height, but this trend was not obvious in mild and moderate degeneration groups. After implantation of four different height cages (8, 10, 12, 14 mm), the RoM of L3/L4 segment reached the maximum during extension. The RoM of mild degeneration group was 2.07°, 2.45°, 2.48°, 2.54°, that of moderate degeneration group was 1.79°, 1.97°, 2.05°, 2.05°, and that of severe degeneration group was 1.43°, 1.66°, 1.74°, 1.74°. The stress of L3–L4 intervertebral disc reached the maximum during flexion. The maximum stress of L3–L4 intervertebral disc was 20.16 MPa, 20.28 MPa, 20.31 MPa and 20.33 MPa in the mild group, 20.58 MPa, 20.66 MPa, 20.71 MPa and 20.75 MPa in the moderate group, and 21.27 MPa, 21.40 MPa, 21.50 MPa and 21.60 MPa in the severe group. Conclusion: For patients with mild-to-moderate lumbar degenerative disease who need to undergo TLIF surgery, it is recommended that the height of fusion cage should not exceed the original intervertebral space height by 2 mm, while for patients with severe degeneration, a fusion cage close to the original intervertebral height should be selected as far as possible, and the intervertebral space should not be overstretched. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adequate discectomy and endplate preparation are extremely crucial steps for spinal interbody fusion. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion MITLIF technique is safe and effective. However, concerns exist regarding sufficient disc space preparation from unilateral access. The purpose of this study, was to demonstrate our preliminary experience in objective and subjective evaluation of disc space preparation intraoperatively during endoscope-assisted MITLIF with fluoroscopy-guided, describing some of its possible advantages, and analyzing its safety and feasibility.Methods: From March 2018 to July 2019, three patients with degenerative spinal stenosis with radiculopathy and instability underwent endoscope-assisted MITLIF with fluoroscopy-guided. Patients' demographic data, clinical parameters, subsidence, and fusion were collected.Results: Patients were successfully treated by endoscope-assisted MITLIF with fluoroscopy-guided at single-level or two-level. Symptoms improved postoperatively in all patients, and no complications occurred during follow-up. No cage subsidence was observed. At 6-month postoperatively, there was bony fusion observed on computed tomography in two patients.Conclusion: Endoscope-assisted MITLIF with fluoroscopy-guided is a safe and feasible technique to improve visualization during discectomy and endplate preparation objectively and subjectively, possibly increasing fusion rate and early time to fusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lumbar ligamentum flavum hematomas (LFHs) are rare. However, when they occur and contribute to epidural cauda equina compression, timely surgical intervention is frequently warranted. Case Description: A 69-year-old female presented with the left lower extremity sciatica and gait disturbance of 2 weeks' duration that ultimately evolved into a paraparesis/cauda equina syndrome. When the lumbar MRI revealed left-sided L4-L5 epidural compression attributed to a hemorrhage into the hypertrophied ligamentum flavum (HLF), she successfully underwent a bilateral fenestration/decompressive procedure. Pathologically, neovascularization and rupture of the ventral layers of the degenerated and thickened HLF contributed to the LFH. Conclusion: Arterial neovascularization (i.e., arterial feeding vessels from paramuscular/prelaminar lumbar branches) contributed to a left-sided L4-L5 LFH that resulted in epidural cauda equina compression in a 69-yearold female. Following surgical focal fenestration/decompression, the patient's symptoms/signs resolved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Diagnosis of the cause of low back pain in the presence of degenerative spine disease using conventional imaging techniques, especially in elderly individuals, is challenging. Our aim was to describe our use of bone scintigraphy with single photon emission computed tomography (bone SPECT/CT) in the assessment of low back pain in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease, underlining the clinical utility of bone SPECT/CT imaging in this clinical population to inform diagnosis and treatment. Methods Between January 2016 and December 2017, we used bone SPECT/CT to successfully identify the cause of low back pain in five elderly patients. All patients had been scheduled for extensive spinal fusion surgery based on conventional imaging (plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance). Results After diagnosis using bone SPECT/CT, three patients underwent spinal fusion at 1–2 levels with specific degenerative disk and joint disease, with the other two patients successfully treated using a conservative approach for a non-traumatic insufficiency fracture of the endplate of the L4 vertebral body and a fracture of the transverse process of L3. Clinically meaningful decrease in pain and fracture healing were obtained with conservative treatment. Conclusion Bone SPECT/CT was useful to identify the specific cause of pain in elderly patients with lumbar degenerative disease and to provide appropriate treatment, avoiding the unnecessary use of invasive spinal fusion surgery. Therefore, the clinical utility of bone SPECT/CT is potentially high as it improves diagnosis and lowers the risk of inappropriate invasive spinal surgery.

Objective To study efficacy of minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion (MIS OLIF) to achieve indirect decompression in degenerative lumbar spine disorders. To find out amount of indirect decompression achieved by assessing clinical and radiological outcomes. To find out limitations of indirect decompression. Methods OLIF was carried out in 60 segments/45 patients having degenerative lumbar spine disorders from May 2016 to April 2018. Patients with infection, trauma, lumbar disc prolapse and listhesis >grade 3 were excluded. 53 segments had posterior and 7 segments had anterior fixation. Auto graft was used in 21 and artificial bone graft in 24 patients. Indirect decompression by MIS OLIF was achieved in all patients. Neuromonitioring was not used. Clinical assessment was done using Modified Macnab’s criteria. Radiological assessment was done on X-rays and MRI. Percentage improvement in foraminal height, disc height, segmental lordosis, spinal canal area and reduction in listhesis were measured. Statistical assessment was done using Paired‘t’ test. Results 60 segments of 45 consecutive patients were operated with 15 of them male and 30 female. Average age was 63 years. Minimum follow-up was for 1 month and maximum follow-up was for 18 months with average of 11 months. Single segment fusion was done in 31, 2 segment fusion in 13 and 3 segment fusion in 1 patient. Clinically 33 (73.33%) had excellent, 11 (24.44%) had good & 1 (2.22%) had fair outcomes. None required direct decompression. Radiologically; foraminal height improved by 26.27%, disc height 92.1%, segmental lordosis 3.4° and listhesis reduction was 6.8°, 41 segments studied on MRI had improvement in spinal canal area of 42.7%. Conclusion Indirect decompression by MIS OLIF is effective in decompressing the spinal canal with good radiological and clinical out comes. Direct decompression is avoidable with help of interbody distraction using OLIF particularly in patients with Schizas grade A, B, and C of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a widespread condition that significantly affects the quality of life in elderly individuals. Conservative therapy has a positive effect on patients whose primary symptom is pain. However, in severe cases with the presence of hypesthesia and paresis, surgical treatment comes into consideration. The aim of surgery is to decompress the neurovascular elements compressed by the narrowed spinal canal while preserving spinal stability. Conventional laminectomy, with or without fusion, has been considered effective for the treatment of this pathology, but its drawbacks are significant, including tissue trauma, secondary instability, and a substantial percentage of reoperations due to complications. In recent years, various minimally invasive spine surgery techniques have emerged, showing comparable results to laminectomy decompression in terms of relieving symptomatic spinal stenosis. Additionally, these techniques offer significant benefits such as minimal tissue trauma, reduced complication rates, and shorter operative time and recovery periods. Given the continuous development and improvement, minimally invasive surgery is expected to widely replace traditional open surgery for the treatment of lumbar stenosis in the future. In this article, we present our experience in the surgical treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis, detailing the technique of the minimally invasive procedure we utilize and highlighting some of the clinical cases in which it has been applied., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Cekov et al.)

Study Design: This study retrospectively analyzes prospectively collected data.Objective: Here we aim to develop predictive models for 3-month medical and surgical readmission after elective lumbar surgery, based on a multi-institutional, national spine registry.Summary Of Background Data: Unplanned readmissions place considerable stress on payers, hospitals, and patients. Medicare data reveals a 30-day readmission rate of 7.8% for lumbar-decompressions and 13.0% for lumbar-fusions, and hospitals are now being penalized for excessive 30-day readmission rates by virtue of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.Methods: The Quality and Outcomes Database (QOD) was queried for patients undergoing elective lumbar surgery for degenerative diseases. The QOD prospectively captures 3-month readmissions through electronic medical record (EMR) review and self-reported outcome questionnaires. Distinct multivariable logistic regression models were fitted for surgery-related and medical readmissions adjusting for patient and surgery-specific variables.Results: Of the total 33,674 patients included in this study 2079 (6.15%) reported at least one readmission during the 90-day postoperative period. The odds of medical readmission were significantly higher for older patients, males versus females, African Americans versus Caucasion, those with higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, diabetes, coronary artery disease, higher numbers of involved levels, anterior only or anterior-posterior versus posterior approach; also, for patients who were unemployed compared with employed patients and those with high baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The odds of surgery-related readmission were significantly greater for patients with a higher body mass index (BMI), a higher ASA grade, female versus male, and African Americans versus Caucasians; also, for patients with severe depression, more involved spinal levels, anterior-only surgical approaches and higher baseline ODI scores.Conclusion: In this study we present internally validated predictive models for medical and surgical readmission after elective lumbar spine surgery. These findings set the stage for targeted interventions with a potential to reduce unnecessary readmissions, and also suggest that medical and surgical readmissions be treated as distinct clinical events.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lumbar osteophyte is abnormal or excessive bone growth in the lumbar vertebrae due to spinal degeneration. Symptoms range from mild pain to severe neuropathy. The objective of this review is to determine the relationship between Thai working lifestyles and lumbar osteophyte. The prevalence of lumbar osteophyte in a sample of Thai skeletons aged 15-96 years (mean 63 years) was found to be very high (97.2%), and affected all samples aged 36 years and above. The location and severity of osteophyte depends on posture and body movement, especially trunk flexion and lateral bending. The majority of Thai workers with osteophyte were engaged in the agricultural and manufacturing sectors, occupations that involve heavy lifting, repeated trunk flexion and lateral bending. Between 2005 and 2014 musculo- skeletal disorders among Thai worker have doubled. Results of this review showed that working lifestyles are related with lumbar osteophyte, and encourages health promotion staffs to provide knowledge and education about correct posture and body movement to help prevent or delay degeneration of bones, muscles or tissues of joints causing osteophyte. Correct behavior in the form of posture may reduce risk of lumbar osteophyte.

Objective To compare the radiologic and clinical outcomes between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) without laminectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). Methods This was a retrospective study. Between April 2012 and January 2017, 25 patients in each of the MI-TLIF and OLIF groups were recruited as matched pairs. Clinical outcomes included visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and satisfaction rates. Radiographic outcomes comprised disc height (DH) and fusion status. Intraoperative data and complications were collected. All patients completed the clinical and radiologic outcomes. Outcomes were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. Results Matched pairs were compared between 2 groups in terms of demographic data and preoperative measurements; less blood loss and shorter operative time were found in OLIF versus MI-TLIF (P < 0.001). The total complication rate was 36% in OLIF and 32% in MI-TLIF (P = 0.77). The outcomes of visual analogue scale and Oswestry Disability Index were significantly improved in both groups, and there was no significant difference between 2 groups. Satisfaction rates of the both groups were more than 90%. OLIF was superior to MI-TLIF with respect its capability to restore DH (P < 0.001). Earlier time of fusion was observed in OLIF (80%) compared with MI-TLIF (52%) at 6 months (P = 0.04). Conclusions OLIF may achieve equivalent clinical and radiologic outcomes compared with MI-TLIF when the stenosis is minimal because the decompression performed is indirect. Furthermore, the OLIF shows less blood loss and shorter operative time, better restoration of DH, and earlier time to fusion than the MI-TLIF. Highlights • Up to date, no study has been published directly comparing OLIF with MI-TLIF. • Less blood loss and shorter operative time in OLIF versus MI-TLIF. • OLIF was superior to MI-TLIF with respect its capability to restore disc height. • Earlier time to fusion was found in OLIF (80%) compared with MI-TLIF (52%) at 6-month. • OLIF (indirect decompression) may achieve equivalent outcomes compared to MI-TLIF when the stenosis is minimal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Rehabilitation / Rehabilitacija is the property of University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: In Taiwan, the life expectancy of an 80-year-old man is 88.4 years and the life expectancy of an 80-year-old woman is 89.8 years. Some of these people will develop symptomatic degenerative lumbar diseases that interfere with an active lifestyle. These older surgical candidates usually ask the surgeon whether it would be safe to undergo surgery. However, there is no literature assessing the outcomes of laminectomy, fusion and posterior fixation for degenerative lumbar diseases in patients older than 80 years. The purpose of this study was to report the surgical outcomes of patients 80 years of age and older who underwent spinal decompression and instrumented lumbar arthrodesis for degeneration lumbar diseases. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with degenerative lumbar diseases and spinal stenosis who underwent surgery between January 2010 and December 2012. Inclusion criteria were age greater than or equal to 80 years, decompression with instrumented lumbar arthrodesis, and at least 2 years of follow-up. Totally 89 patients were studies. Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) of leg and back pain. Plain radiographs (lateral, anteroposterior, and flexion-extension) were used to assess the status of fusion and implant-related complications. Every complication during admission and any implant-related or failed-back syndrome requiring a second surgery was documented. T test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Five patients were lost to follow-up, and another 12 died during the follow-up period. One patient died due to cerebral stroke just 2 days after surgery, and the other 11 patients passed away 3 months to 4 years postoperatively. In all, 72 patients had an adequate follow-up: 44 were female and 28 were male. The average age at surgery was 82.5 ± 2.6 years (80 to 93); 63 patients underwent their first lumbar surgery, and nine patients received a second surgery. Patients underwent arthrodesis surgeries were from a single-level to a 7–level. Four patients developed complications (5.6 %, 4/72). At the final follow-up, the average ODI score was lower than the preoperative score (30.0 vs. 61.8) (p < 0.001). The average VAS score also showed improvement (leg: p < 0.001; back: p < 0.001). Forty-three patients were classified as "satisfied", and 29 were "dissatisfied". Longer operation time (p = 0.014) and development of complications (p = 0.049) were related to poor clinical results. Radiographic follow-up showed that 53 patients had solid union, ten had a probable union, and nine had pseudarthrosis. More surgical segments led to a greater chance of pseudarthrosis (2.0 ± 0.9 vs 3.0 ± 1.8, p = 0.003). Conclusion: Longer instrumented segments and development of complications contributed to worse clinical and radiographic outcomes. With proper patient selection, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion can be safe and effective for patients 80 years of age and older with degenerative lumbar conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) is a prevalent condition among the elderly population. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often the first investigative modality if indicated clinically. However, the standard supine position used during an MRI may fail to detect dynamic instability. In such cases, the presence of facet joint fluid is a reliable sign, and further investigation, such as stress radiographs, should be conducted to confirm dynamic instability. Here, we present a typical case demonstrating the importance of this finding. A patient presented with neurological claudication, and an MRI was initially unremarkable except for the presence of lumbar facet joint fluid. This finding prompted us to conduct stress radiographs, which eventually confirmed dynamic instability., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Singh et al.)

Purpose: Recent studies suggest that the location of predominant pain (back or leg) can be a significant predictor of the outcome of surgery for degenerative spinal disorders. However, others challenge the notion that the predominant symptom can be reliably identified. This study examined the validity of a single item used to determine the most troublesome symptom. Methods: A total of 2,778 patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine scheduled for surgery with the goal of pain relief completed a questionnaire enquiring as to their most troublesome symptom ['main symptom'; back pain (BACK) or leg/buttock pain (LEG)]. They also completed separate 0-10 graphic rating scales for back pain (LBP) and leg/buttock pain (LP) intensity. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to determine the accuracy with which the 'LP minus LBP' score was able to classify patients into their declared 'main symptom' group. Sub-studies evaluated the test-retest reliability of the patients' self-rated pain scores ( N = 45) and the agreement between the main symptom declared by the patient in the questionnaire and that documented by the surgeon after the clinical consultation ( N = 118). Results: Test-retest reliability of the back and leg pain scores was good (ICC of 0.8 for each), as was patient-surgeon agreement regarding the main symptom (BACK or LEG) (κ value 0.79). In the BACK group, the mean values for pain intensity were 7.3 ± 2.0 (LBP) and 5.2 ± 2.9 (LP); in the LEG group, they were 4.3 ± 2.9 (LBP) and 7.5 ± 1.9 (LP). The area under the curve for the ROC was 0.95 (95 % CI 0.94-0.95), indicating excellent discrimination between the BACK and LEG groups based on the 'LP minus LBP' scores. A cutoff score >0.0 for 'LP minus LBP' score gave optimal sensitivity and specificity for indicating membership of the LEG group (sensitivity 79.1 %, specificity 95.7 %). Conclusions: The responses on the single item for the 'main symptom' were in good agreement with the differential ratings on the 0-10 pain scales for LBP and LP intensity. The cutoff >0 for 'LP minus LBP' for classifying patients as LEG pain predominant seemed appropriate and suggests good concurrent validity for the single-item measure. The single item may be of use in sub-grouping patients with the same disorder (e.g. spondylolisthesis) or as an indication in surgical decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Posterolateral fusion (PLF) is a common method for achieving fusion in lumbar spine surgery. Posterior lumbar inter-body fusion (PLIF) has been reported to give a higher fusion rate and a better functional and clinical outcome. Objectives: The objective of the review was to determine whether PLIF is more effective than PLF in improving clinical and radiological outcomes in adults surgically treated for degenerative lumbar spine conditions. Methods: Electronic databases, bibliographies and relevant journals were searched systematically, and a meta-analysis was conducted. Results: Of 2798 citations identified, five studies met our inclusion criteria; none was a randomized controlled trial. A total of 148 patients had undergone PLIF (intervention) and 159 PLF (control). Pooled meta-analyses showed that non-union rates were lower in the intervention group (relative risk (RR), 0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.08–0.62). The intervention group had significantly heavier disc height (weighted mean difference, 3.2mm; 95% CI, 1.9–4.4) and less residual percentage slippage (weighted mean difference, 6.3%; 95% CI, 3.9–8.7) at final follow-up. No significant difference in segmental or total lumbar lordosis was seen. Because of the heterogeneity of the results, no conclusion could be drawn about the functional benefits of the two procedures. Conclusion: This review suggests that PLIF results in a higher fusion rate and better correction of certain radiographic aspects of deformity than PLF. It also showed a slight but nonsignificant trend towards a better functional outcome with PLIF. The lack of randomized controlled trials and the methodological limitations of the available studies indicate the need for a sufficiently large, methodologically sound study with clinically relevant outcome measures. Until this has been done, the evidence for the beneficial effects of posterior inter-body fusion should be interpreted with caution. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Lumbar ligamentum flavum hematomas (LFHs) are rare. However, when they occur and contribute to epidural cauda equina compression, timely surgical intervention is frequently warranted., Case Description: A 69-year-old female presented with the left lower extremity sciatica and gait disturbance of 2 weeks' duration that ultimately evolved into a paraparesis/cauda equina syndrome. When the lumbar MRI revealed left-sided L4-L5 epidural compression attributed to a hemorrhage into the hypertrophied ligamentum flavum (HLF), she successfully underwent a bilateral fenestration/decompressive procedure. Pathologically, neovascularization and rupture of the ventral layers of the degenerated and thickened HLF contributed to the LFH., Conclusion: Arterial neovascularization (i.e., arterial feeding vessels from paramuscular/prelaminar lumbar branches) contributed to a left-sided L4-L5 LFH that resulted in epidural cauda equina compression in a 69-year-old female. Following surgical focal fenestration/decompression, the patient's symptoms/signs resolved., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2022 Surgical Neurology International.)

The interspinous distraction devices are used to treat variable pathologies ranging from facet syndrome, diskogenic low back pain, degenerative spinal stenosis, diskopathy, spondylolisthesis, and instability. The insertion of a posterior element with an interspinous device (ISD) is commonly judged responsive to a relative kyphosis of a lumbar segment with a moderate but persistent increase of the spinal canal and of the foraminal width and area, and without influence on low-grade spondylolisthesis. The consequence is the need of shared specific biomechanical concepts to give for each degenerative problem the right indication through a critical analysis of all available experimental and clinical biomechanical data. We reviewed systematically the available clinical and experimental data about kyphosis, enlargement of the spinal canal, distraction of the interspinous distance, increase of the neural foramina, ligamentous structures, load of the posterior annulus, intradiskal pressure, strength of the spinous processes, degeneration of the adjacent segment, complications, and cost-effectiveness of the ISD. The existing literature does not provide actual scientific evidence over the superiority of the ISD strategy, but most of the experimental and clinical data show a challenging potential. These considerations are applicable with different types of ISD with only few differences between the different categories. Despite-or because of-the low invasiveness of the surgical implantation of the ISD, this technique promises to play a major role in the future degenerative lumbar microsurgery. The main indications for ISD remain lumbar spinal stenoses and painful facet arthroses. A clear documented contraindication is the presence of an anterolisthesis. Nevertheless, the existing literature does not provide evidence of superiority of outcome and cost-effectiveness of the ISD strategy over laminectomy or other surgical procedures. At this time, the devices should be used in clinical randomized independent trials in order to obtain more information concerning the most advantageous optimal indication or, in selected cases, to treat tailored indications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Sport- Und Präventivmedizin is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The Swedish Spine Register enables monitoring of surgical activities focusing on changes in trends over time, techniques utilized and outcome, when implemented in general clinical practice. Basic requirements for a prosperous register are unity within the profession, mainly patient-based documentation and a well functioning support system. This presentation focuses on the development and design of the register protocol, problems encountered and solutions found underway. Various examples on how the results can be presented and utilized are given as well as validation. Register data demonstrate significant gender differences in lumbar disc herniation surgery with females having more pain, lower quality of life and more pronounced disability preoperatively while improvement after surgery is similar between genders. Quality of life after surgery for degenerative disorders is significantly improved for disc herniation, stenosis, spondylolisthesis and disc degenerative disorders. Over the last 10 years, surgical treatment for spinal stenosis has increased gradually while disc herniation surgery decreases regarding yearly number of procedures. An added function to the register enables more complex prospective clinical studies to include register data together with data suitable for the individual study. A common core set of demographic, surgical and outcome parameters would enable comparisons of clinical studies within and between nations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Until recently, open decompression was considered the gold standard for the management of spinal stenosis, but the evolution of minimally invasive spine instruments has brought a new dimension to the management of spinal stenosis. Full endoscopic surgery has a lot of advantages in terms of minimal soft tissue damage, less bleeding, shorter hospital length of stay, and earlier return to work. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of full endoscopic lumbar decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis compared with classic open decompression surgery., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis without instability, consisting of 132 open decompression and 163 full endoscopic decompression patients. We evaluated the clinical result of the pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) of leg pain, back pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). We observed the patients until 1 year after the operation., Results: The postoperative ODI scores and VAS scores for back pain and leg pain were better than the preoperative scores. The ODI scores and VAS scores for leg pain were significantly better in both groups (P = 0.033 and 0.04, respectively). The main difference between open and full endoscopic decompression was the VAS back pain and amount of bleeding. In the full endoscopic group, the mean VAS back pain was 1.6 and the amount of bleeding was minimal. In the open decompression surgery, the mean VAS back pain was 3.5 and the amount of bleeding was around 84 mL. The length of hospital stay was shorter in the full endoscopic group, which was 1.5 days compared with 3.4 days in open decompression ( P = 0.034)., Conclusion: Full endoscopic decompression showed better early results compared with the conventional group, but a long-term study is still needed for further evaluation of the clinical results. The use of the full endoscopic technique is very promising in the management of spinal stenosis., Clinical Relevance: This study provides a comparison of the efficacy of open decompression and full endoscopic decompression in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2022 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.)

Eighty-five patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease and radiologic evidence of instability, all older than 50 years (mean age 63.4 years), underwent transpedicular lumbar CD-spondylodesis and posterolateral fusion between 1987 and 1992; 30 of them (mean age 60.8 years) had posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) additionally. The patients were followed up for a mean period of 32 months. Of these patients, 86% improved with respect to their pain symptoms, but only 46% showed a good to excellent overall result. Patients with fair and poor outcomes had had significantly more operations on the lumbar spine (P < 0.001), had a greater extent of preoperative lumbar kyphosis (P < 0.05), had a larger preoperative motor weakness (P < 0.05), and had less vertebral slips (P < 0.01) than patients with good to excellent outcomes. Patients treated with transpedicular spondylodesis plus PLIF did not make any better progress than those with transpedicular fusion alone. By the 6-month follow-up a significant difference in the clinical outcome was already apparent (P < 0.001), making an improvement of a then fair or poor result unlikely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Meticulous disc space preparation is an important step toward ensuring arthrodesis in the interbody fusion procedure. Although minimally invasive techniques are becoming increasingly advanced in lumbar interbody fusion, concerns exist regarding adequate discectomy and sufficient endplate preparation from a transforaminal lumbar approach., Objective: To describe the radiographic and clinical outcomes of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) using the intraoperative fluoroscopy-guided method for disc space preparation., Methods: This is a retrospective study of 25 patients operated between June 2016 and Dec 2017. The radiographic outcomes included the intraoperative percentage of disc space preparation, fusion, and subsidence. Percentage of disc space preparation was calculated through intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging. Clinical outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and satisfaction rate., Results: Mean age of patients was 62.9 yr. The mean follow-up period was 22 mo. Mean extents of disc space preparation were 61.5% in the anteroposterior view and 80.3% in the lateral view. Fusion rates were 86% and 92% at 6 and 12-mo postoperatively, respectively. All patients showed clinical improvement according to VAS and ODI., Conclusion: MI-TLIF with intraoperative fluoroscopy-guided disc space preparation is shown to lead to potentially improved fusion rate. It is a safe and effective surgical method for degenerative lumbar disease. Additionally, in cases of cage subsidence caused by the endplate violation during disc space preparation, thorough sufficient bone grafting of the defect region avoids pseudoarthrosis., (Copyright © 2020 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Background: Diagnosis of the cause of low back pain in the presence of degenerative spine disease using conventional imaging techniques, especially in elderly individuals, is challenging. Our aim was to describe our use of bone scintigraphy with single photon emission computed tomography (bone SPECT/CT) in the assessment of low back pain in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease, underlining the clinical utility of bone SPECT/CT imaging in this clinical population to inform diagnosis and treatment. Methods: Between January 2016 and December 2017, we used bone SPECT/CT to successfully identify the cause of low back pain in five elderly patients. All patients had been scheduled for extensive spinal fusion surgery based on conventional imaging (plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance). Results: After diagnosis using bone SPECT/CT, three patients underwent spinal fusion at 1–2 levels with specific degenerative disk and joint disease, with the other two patients successfully treated using a conservative approach for a non-traumatic insufficiency fracture of the endplate of the L4 vertebral body and a fracture of the transverse process of L3. Clinically meaningful decrease in pain and fracture healing were obtained with conservative treatment. Conclusion: Bone SPECT/CT was useful to identify the specific cause of pain in elderly patients with lumbar degenerative disease and to provide appropriate treatment, avoiding the unnecessary use of invasive spinal fusion surgery. Therefore, the clinical utility of bone SPECT/CT is potentially high as it improves diagnosis and lowers the risk of inappropriate invasive spinal surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: As a result of continuously increasing life expectancy, the number of requests for surgery to treat degenerative diseases of the spine in the elderly population will increase. Since older age is associated with the occurrence of medical comorbidities, the demand for less extensive surgical approaches is growing. The aim of this study is to establish whether minimally invasive fusion techniques are a safe and adequate tool for use in elderly patients., Patients and Methods: We analyzed 187 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the form of one- to four-level fusion procedures. In 146 patients, additional widening of the spinal canal was performed. The subjects were grouped into four age categories of approximately equal size (33-56, 56-66, 66-74 and 74-85). The effect of age on the incidence of peri- and postoperative complications was investigated and compared between the age groups., Results: Older age was not associated with the occurrence of perioperative complications, which include wound healing disorders, hematomas, wound traction-blisters and cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Fourteen patients (7.49%) encountered distinct surgical technique related complications, making surgical revision necessary in eight patients (4.28%). Furthermore, increasing age didn't elevate the risk of postoperative adverse events, i.e. pulmonary embolism, ischemic heart attack or pneumonia, among others. However, older patients were found to stay in hospital longer than younger patients, especially when more than one level was fused., Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgery techniques are safe in elderly patients. The small-scale surgical approach guarantees a low incidence of infections and wound healing disorders. However, a longer hospital stay must be expected in older patients., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Ex vivo human cadaveric study., Objective: The development or progression of adjacent segment disease (ASD) after spine stabilization and fusion is a major problem in spine surgery. Apart from optimal balancing of the sagittal profile, dynamic instrumentation is often suggested to prevent or impede ASD. Hybrid instrumentation is used to gain stabilization while allowing motion to avoid hypermobility in the adjacent segment. In this biomechanical study, the effects of two different hybrid instrumentations on human cadaver spines were evaluated and compared with a rigid instrumentation., Methods: Eighteen human cadaver spines (T11-L5) were subdivided into three groups: rigid, dynamic, and hook comprising six spines each. Clinical parameters and initial mechanical characteristics were consistent among groups. All specimens received rigid fixation from L3-L5 followed by application of a free bending load of extension and flexion. The range of motion (ROM) for every segment was evaluated. For the rigid group, further rigid fixation from L1-L5 was applied. A dynamic Elaspine system (Spinelab AG, Winterthur, Switzerland) was applied from L1 to L3 for the dynamic group, and the hook group was instrumented with additional laminar hooks at L1-L3. ROM was then evaluated again., Results: There was no significant difference in ROM among the three instrumentation techniques., Conclusion: Based on this data, the intended advantage of a hybrid or dynamic instrumentation might not be achieved.