Search

Background and Aims Remimazolam is an ultra–short-acting benzodiazepine currently being developed for procedural sedation and for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. This trial was the fourth study for procedural sedation. The aim was to compare the safety and efficacy profile of remimazolam and to refine suitable doses for subsequent phase III studies in this indication. Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, active controlled clinical trial with 162 male and female patients, aged 18 to 70, scheduled to undergo a routine colonoscopy. Patients were randomized to receive 1 of 3 remimazolam doses or midazolam for sedation. Supplemental oxygen and 100 μg of fentanyl was given before procedures were started, and the colonoscopy commenced as soon as suitable sedation had been achieved (Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score ≤3). Top-up doses of the study drug and/or fentanyl were allowed to maintain suitable sedation and/or analgesia. Response was defined as sufficient sedation, no rescue sedative, and no ventilation required. Results This study showed that a single dose of remimazolam or midazolam, followed by top-up doses to maintain suitable sedation, provided adequate sedation with a high success rate (>92%) for the remimazolam groups, compared with 75% for the midazolam group ( P = .007). There was no requirement for mechanical ventilation in any group, and procedure failures were all due to use of rescue sedative. Conclusions The high success rates and good safety profile of remimazolam observed in this study warrants further investigation and confirmation in phase III trials. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01145222 .)

Dextromethorphan hydrobromide (DM) is a widely used antitussive. This study determined, for the first time, the basic pharmacokinetic profile of DM and its active metabolite, dextrorphan (DP) in children and adolescents. Thirty-eight male and female subjects at risk for developing an upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), or symptomatic with cough due to URTI, were enrolled in this single-dose, open-label study: ages 2–5 years (Group A, n = 8), 6–11 years (Group B, n = 17), 12–17 years (Group C, n = 13). Subjects were genotyped for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 polymorphisms and characterized as poor (PM) or non-poor metabolizers (non-PM). Groups A and B were dosed using an age–weight dosing schedule (DM range 7.5–24.75 mg); a 30-mg dose was used for Group C. Average exposures to total DP increased as age group increased, and average exposure to DM was highest in the adolescent group. One subject in that group was a PM. The terminal half-life (t ½) values were longer in the adolescent group due in part to the single PM subject. No relationship between body weight and pharmacokinetic parameters was noted. This is the first evaluation of the pharmacokinetic characteristics of DM in children and adolescents. A single dose of DM in this population was safe, and well tolerated at all doses tested. The data are used to model and compare pediatric DM exposures with those of adults.

A randomized, double blind, dose-response comparison of balsalazide (6.75 g), balsalazide (2.25 g), and mesalamine (2.4 g) in the treatment of active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis

Background: Liquid purgatives for cleansing before colonoscopy often are poorly tolerated. A sodium phosphate tablet has been developed to provide equivalent efficacy with better patient tolerance. These 2 studies compare the safety, efficacy, and patient acceptance of the tablet (Visicol) to a polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution in adults undergoing colonoscopy. Methods: Two identically designed, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter trials were performed. The primary efficacy variable was the overall quality of colon cleansing. Patient tolerance was assessed in terms of compliance with the dosing regimen. Safety assessments included recording of adverse events and changes in biochemical tests, electrocardiogram, and vital signs. Results: Eight hundred forty-five patients participated in the studies; 420 took sodium phosphate tablets and 425 took a PEG solution. The 2 methods of preparation were equivalent in the overall quality of colon cleansing, cleansing in the right colon, and the frequency of inadequate preparation. Overall cleansing was excellent or good in 84.3% of patients in the tablet group and in 76.7% in the PEG group. Patient compliance was greater in the tablet group. There were also significantly fewer GI side effects in this group. Conclusions: Sodium phosphate tablets, compared with PEG solution, produce equivalent colon cleansing, are associated with fewer GI side effects, and are better tolerated by patients. (Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:705-13.)

Background Complications of chronic anal fissure (CAF) treatments are prompting interest in lower-risk therapies. This study was conducted to compare nitroglycerin (NTG) 0.4% ointment with placebo for pain associated with CAF. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with one CAF and moderate-to-severe pain (≥50 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]) received 375 mg NTG 0.4% (1.5 mg active ingredient) or 375 mg placebo ointment applied anally every 12 hours for 21 days. The primary end point was change from baseline VAS score in 24-hour pain averaged over days 14–18. Review of data from patients who withdrew early was blinded to treatment. To control for the confounding effects of analgesics, all patients received 650 mg acetaminophen for headache prophylaxis before each application. Results A total of 247 patients were enrolled (NTG, n = 123; placebo, n = 124). The prespecified baseline observation carried forward (BOCF) analysis found no significant difference between groups; however, a last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis showed a significant advantage for NTG. A post hoc analysis (LOCF/BOCF hybrid) demonstrated a significant adjusted mean difference of −7.0 mm in favor of NTG 0.4% (95% CI −13.6, –0.4; P = .038). Headache was the most common adverse event in the NTG (69.9%) and placebo (47.6%) groups. Conclusions This was the first placebo-controlled study that also controlled for the confounding effects of analgesics used to treat NTG-induced headache. In patients with moderate-to-severe CAF pain, NTG 0.4% ointment effectively reduced CAF pain compared with placebo. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00522041

Objective Compare the efficacy and tolerability of the dual-opioid, Q8003® (morphine/oxycodone combination) 12 mg/8 mg to morphine 12 mg or oxycodone 8 mg in subjects following bunionectomy surgery. Design This was a randomized, double-blind study. Setting Hospitalized patients. Patients Healthy men or women aged ≥18 years with moderate or severe pain (score ≥2 on a 4-point Likert scale) and ≥4 on the 11-point numerical pain rating scale following surgery. Interventions Study medication was initiated after surgery and was given for 48 hours. Outcomes The primary efficacy variable was mean sum of the pain intensity difference (SPID) scores from the postsurgical baseline. Results Five hundred twenty-two subjects were randomized; 31 (5.9%) discontinued, including 19 (3.6%) for adverse events. The mean total morphine equivalent dose (MED) was 182.7 mg from Q8003 12 mg/8 mg, 92.4 mg for morphine 12 mg, and 92.1 mg for oxycodone 8 mg. SPID from baseline over 24 hours and SPID from baseline over 48 hours were significantly (P

Conivaptan is a non-peptide dual antagonist of vasopressin V1A and V2 receptors that is approved in the United States as an intravenous formulation for the treatment of euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia in hospitalized patients. The pharmacokinetics of intravenous conivaptan had not been studied in patients with hepatic or renal impairment.The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of intravenous conivaptan in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic or renal impairment compared with subjects with normal function.These studies were phase I, open-label pharmacokinetic studies conducted at two sites in the US.Men and non-pregnant women 30-70 years of age were allocated to the mild (Child-Pugh classification score of 5-6) or moderate (Child-Pugh classification score of 7-9) hepatically impaired groups (n = 8-9 per group) based on their liver function assessed at screening. For the renal study, men and non-pregnant women between 18 and 70 years of age were assigned to renal function groups (n = 8-9 per group) based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) assessed at screening. Normal renal function was defined as an eGFR80 ml/min, mild renal impairment as 50-80 ml/min, and moderate renal impairment as 30-49 ml/min. Subjects with normal hepatic or renal function were selected to match the race, sex, age, and body mass index of subjects enrolled in the impaired groups.Subjects were administered a 20-mg/30-min intravenous loading dose of conivaptan on day 1, followed by a 20-mg/23.5-h continuous conivaptan infusion. On day 2, immediately following the end of the day 1 infusion, a 20-mg/24-h continuous conivaptan infusion was administered.Primary pharmacokinetic parameters estimated were the area under the plasma conivaptan concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC∞), plasma conivaptan concentrations at the end of the 20-mg loading dose (C LD), and plasma conivaptan concentrations at the end of the second day 20-mg/24-h continuous infusion (C 48).For each of C LD, C 48, and AUC∞, the mean values were similar for subjects with mild hepatic impairment and subjects with normal hepatic function. Subjects with moderate hepatic impairment had a 73 % higher C 48 and an 80 % higher AUC∞ compared with subjects with normal hepatic function. There were no clinically relevant changes in conivaptan exposure in the mild and moderate renal impairment groups compared with subjects with normal renal function. Intravenous conivaptan was generally well tolerated in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic or renal impairment. Infusion-site reaction was the most commonly reported adverse event.Overall exposure to conivaptan increased in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared with subjects with normal hepatic function. Therefore, in patients with moderate hepatic impairment, conivaptan should be initiated with a loading dose of 10 mg over 30 min followed by 10 mg per day as a continuous infusion for 2-4 days, which is half the approved dose. No dose adjustment is necessary in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment and in patients with mild hepatic impairment.

One influenza pandemic preparedness strategy involves priming a population with a pre-pandemic subtype-specific vaccine and boosting the immunological response at the time of the pandemic with a strain-matched vaccine. In the current study, adults (n=469) randomised 15 months previously to receive an A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) influenza vaccine (3.75 μg haemagglutinin antigen [HA]) administered alone or in combination with an oil-in-water emulsion based Adjuvant System containing 11.86 mg (AS03(A)) or 5.93 mg (AS03(B)) tocopherol per dose, received one booster dose of A/turkey/Turkey/1/2005 (H5N1) vaccine (3.75 μg HA) with or without AS03(A). An anamnestic antibody response that met US regulatory acceptance criteria was observed 15 months after priming. Although superior immunogenicity of AS03-adjuvanted compared to unadjuvanted priming was not demonstrated, higher antibody titres which persisted longer were seen when both priming and boosting regimens were adjuvanted. This may affect duration of response or heterologous immunity. The booster vaccines had a clinically acceptable safety/reactogenicity profile after adjuvanted or unadjuvanted priming. This study has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00771615.

Diclofenac potassium liquid-filled soft gelatin capsule (DPSGC; Zipsor*) is a novel formulation of diclofenac potassium used to treat mild to moderate acute pain.To investigate whether DPSGC 25 mg provided significant reduction in pain intensity compared with placebo, regardless of baseline pain intensity, a post hoc analysis was performed of pooled data from two replicate randomized controlled trials (NCT00366444 and NCT00375934) that evaluated the safety and efficacy of DPSGC in postbunionectomy treatment.Patients from the two randomized trials were assigned to one of two subgroups: patients with baseline numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) scores of 4 or greater to less than 7 and those with baseline NPRS scores of 7 or greater. Within each subgroup, efficacy and safety of DPSGC was compared with placebo.Across the two studies, 73 DPSGC- and 59 placebo-treated patients had baseline pain intensity scores ranging from 4 or greater to less than 7, while 128 DPSGC- and 141 placebo-treated patients had baseline pain intensity scores of 7 or greater. Significantly lower mean 48-hour NPRS scores were observed in the DPSGC group, regardless of baseline pain intensity (P 0.0001). In both subgroups, at least twice as many patients treated with DPSGC rated the study drug as very good or excellent compared with patients taking placebo. Potential limitations for this post hoc analysis include study design and patient population. As with all studies investigating treatment for pain, the use of rescue medication may also be a potential limitation.DPSGC provided significantly greater improvements in pain compared with placebo following bunionectomy, regardless of patients' baseline pain level.

Objective: To compare efficacy and safety profiles of an immediate-release morphine and oxycodone Dual-Opioid® combination (MoxDuo®) versus its individual components and versus its morphine-equivalent doses in moderate to severe postoperative pain patients. Design: Randomized, double-blind, 48-hour, parallel-treatment, multicenter, six-arm study of MoxDuo. Setting: Six US centers. Patients: Within 6 hours after bunionectomy surgery, patients were eligible if they reported pain intensity 2 on the 4-point Likert scale and 4 on an 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (197 randomly assigned; 175 completers). Interventions: MoxDuo 12 mg/8 mg, MoxDuo 6 mg/4 mg, morphine 12 mg, oxycodone 8 mg, morphine 6 mg, or oxycodone 4 mg (all administered q6h). Main outcome measure: Sum of pain intensity differences 0-24 hours after the first dose of study medication (SPID24) and percentage of patients with moderate to severe nausea, emesis, or dizziness. Results: SPID24 was significantly better in the MoxDuo 12 mg/8 mg group when compared with its individual components (morphine 12 mg [p = 0.009] and oxycodone 8 mg [p = 0.037]), and when compared with MoxDuo 6 mg/4 mg (p = 0.011; 54.3 vs 28.5, 35.7, and 30.0, respectively). MoxDuo 6 mg/4 mg and its morphine-equivalent doses (morphine 12 mg and oxycodone 8 mg) had comparable analgesic effects. There was a 50-75 percent reduction in moderate to severe adverse events (AEs) commonly associated with opioids (ie, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness) in the MoxDuo 6 mg/4 mg group when compared with its morphineequivalent dose groups. Conclusions: MoxDuo produced superior analgesic effects when compared with its individual components, but comparable efficacy when compared with its morphine-equivalent doses. Common AEs were reduced at least 50 percent with MoxDuo when compared with its morphine-equivalent doses. MoxDuo may be an improved intervention in the management of moderate to severe acute pain.

Background The tocopherol-based oil-in-water emulsion adjuvant system family (AS03) improves antigen sparing with split-virion H5N1 influenza vaccines, representing an important development for pandemic preparedness. In this phase 1/2 randomized, controlled, observer-blinded study in 680 adults, we assessed the immunogenicity and safety of A/Indonesia/5/05 H5N1 (IBCDC-RG2, clade 2.1) prepandemic candidate vaccines produced at 2 separate manufacturing sites. Methods Two doses, each of which contained 3.75 microg of hemagglutinin antigen, were given 21 days apart either without adjuvant or with an adjuvant system containing 11.86 mg or 5.93 mg of tocopherol (AS03). Results The AS03-adjuvanted A/Indonesia/05/2005 (NIBRG-14) vaccines were significantly more immunogenic than nonadjuvanted vaccine in homologous assays. Neutralizing cross-clade immunogenicity against clades 1, 2.2, and 2.3 was demonstrated at day 42 with all vaccines; at 6 months, seroconversion rates were highest for clade 2.2 (60.7%) and for clade 1 (38.3%). Adjuvantation was associated with increased short-term injection-site reactions (pain) in 80% of participants, with such reactions assessed as being of grade 3 severity for 4.0% of doses. No other safety or reactogenicity concerns were identified over 6 months of follow-up. Conclusions Humoral responses against the adjuvanted 3.75-microg hemagglutinin antigen vaccines from both manufacturing sites fulfilled European and US licensure criteria for immunogenicity for influenza vaccines.

Background: The safety and efficacy of fontolizumab, a humanized anti-interferon gamma antibody, was investigated in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Elevated gut mucosal levels of interferon gamma, a key cytokine involved in the inflammatory process of CD, are associated with disease symptoms. Methods: A total of 201 patients with Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores between 250 and 450 were randomized to receive an initial intravenous dose of 1.0 or 4.0 mg/kg fontolizumab or placebo, followed by up to 3 subcutaneous doses of 0.1 or 1.0 mg/kg fontolizumab or placebo every 4 weeks. Clinical response at day 29, the primary efficacy endpoint, was defined as a decrease in the CDAI of at least 100 points from baseline levels. Results: Of 201 patients, 135 (67%) completed the study. Day 29 response rates were similar in all treatment groups (31%–38%). At subsequent timepoints a significantly greater proportion of patients in the 1.0 mg/kg intravenous / 1.0 mg/kg subcutaneous fontolizumab group had clinical response and significantly greater improvement in the CDAI score compared with patients who received placebo. All fontolizumab groups had significant improvement in C-reactive protein levels. The overall frequency of adverse events was similar in all groups (58%–75%); most events were related to exacerbation of CD. There was a low frequency (5.2%) of neutralizing antibodies to fontolizumab. Conclusions: Although a strong clinical response to fontolizumab was not observed, significant decreases in C-reactive protein levels suggest a biological effect. Fontolizumab was well tolerated, and further studies to assess its efficacy are warranted. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2009

Background: Diclofenac potassium liquid-filled soft gelatin capsule (DPSGC) is a rapidly absorbed formulation of diclofenac potassium developed for the treatment of mild to moderate acute pain. Objective: The present study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety profile of DPSGC 25 mg in patients with pain after first-metatarsal bunionectomy. Methods: This was a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study conducted over 5 days. Patients experiencing the requisite level of pain (score ≥4 on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale [NPRS] from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain) on the day after bunionectomy were randomized to receive DPSGC 25 mg or matching placebo. A second dose was given when patients requested additional medication for pain. Subsequent doses were given every 6 hours over a 48-hour inpatient multiple-dose period and continued over an additional 48-hour outpatient multiple-dose period. Opioid rescue medication was available as needed after the second dose of study medication. The primary efficacy end point was the mean NPRS score over the 48-hour inpatient multiple-dose period. Additional measures included NPRS scores at predefined times over 48 hours, the summed pain intensity difference over 48 hours (SPID48), the time-weighted sum of pain relief scores over the first 8 hours, the mean dosing interval (the time from dosing to the time rescue medication or the next dose of study medication was administered, whichever was less), the proportion of patients requiring rescue medication, and the onset of perceptible and meaningful pain relief (2-stopwatch method). Tolerability was assessed based on physician monitoring and patient reporting of adverse events (AEs) and the results of standard laboratory tests. Results: Of 201 randomized patients (102 DPSGC 25 mg, 99 placebo; 86.6% female; 58.2% white; mean [SD] age, 45.2 [11.5] years; weight range, 49.4–108.0 kg), 198 completed the study. Mean baseline NPRS scores did not differ significantly between the DPSGC and placebo groups (6.9 and 7.3, respectively). DPSGC was associated with significant improvements compared with placebo in mean NPRS score over 48 hours (2.5 vs 5.6, respectively; P < 0.001), mean SPID48 (210.0 vs 90.3; P < 0.001), and overall mean dosing interval (331.5 vs 263.9 min; P < 0.001). Significant differences in NPRS scores between DPSGC 25 mg and placebo were noted at all time points from baseline through 48 hours (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients requiring rescue medication was significantly lower in the DPSGC group compared with the placebo group (39.2% vs 87.9% on day 1; 21.6% vs 64.6% on day 2; both, P < 0.001). Patients receiving DPSGC had a significantly faster onset of meaningful pain relief compared with those receiving placebo (P = 0.008). The most commonly reported AEs were nausea (7.8% vs 18.2%), headache (5.9% vs 9.1%), vomiting (3.9% vs 9.1%), and constipation (3.9% vs 2.0%). The overall incidence of AEs occurring in ≥2% of patients was significantly lower in the DPSGC group than in the placebo group (20.6% vs 44.4%; P < 0.05); no patient receiving DPSGC had a serious AE. Conclusions: DPSGC 25 mg taken every 6 hours was effective in reducing postbunionectomy pain in the patients studied. DPSGC was well tolerated, suggesting that it may be a practicable option for the treatment of mild to moderate acute pain. ClinicalTrials. gov identifier: NCT00366444

This exploratory study was the first study of remimazolam in patients to assess the safety and efficacy of different single doses for procedural sedation.Patients scheduled to undergo a diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomized to receive 1 of 3 doses of remimazolam or midazolam (25 per group) in a double-blind manner. After a single dose of study drug to achieve sedation, patients underwent gastroscopy. We assessed the success of the procedure, sedation levels, recovery from sedation, and safety.A single dose of remimazolam resulted in a successful procedure in 32%, 56%, and 64% of patients in the low (0.10), middle (0.15), and high (0.20 mg/kg) dose groups compared with 44% of patients in the midazolam (0.075 mg/kg) dose group. The onset of sedation was 1.5 to 2.5 minutes in the remimazolam dose groups compared with 5 minutes for midazolam. Because this was a single administration study, sedation could be maintained for as long as necessary to complete the procedure, using rescue midazolam or propofol. Recovery from sedation was rapid for all treatment groups but was influenced by the choice of rescue medication. There were no obvious differences in the safety profiles of remimazolam and midazolam.This exploratory dose-finding study showed that a single administration of remimazolam (0.10-0.20 mg/kg) was capable of inducing rapid sedation with a quick recovery profile in patients undergoing a diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The safety profile was favorable and appeared to be similar to that of midazolam, warranting further development of this short-acting compound.

Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies assessed the analgesic efficacy of valdecoxib in patients with moderate-to-severe pain after bunionectomy. Study 1 (N = 374) assessed the efficacy of two regimens of valdecoxib on the day after surgery (valdecoxib, 40 mg, with a 20-mg redose [n = 127]; valdecoxib, 40 mg, with a placebo redose [n = 122]; and placebo/placebo [n = 125]), and study 2 (N = 478) examined the efficacy of two different multiple-dose regimens on postoperative days 2 through 5 (valdecoxib, 20 mg, twice daily [n = 160]; valdecoxib, 20 mg, once daily [n = 159]; and placebo [n = 159]). Valdecoxib provided significant pain relief and reduced the use of opioid rescue medication. This efficacy was accompanied by improved global scores, decreased pain interference with function, and increased patient satisfaction. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 96(5): 393–407, 2006)

Background: Intestinal inflammation associated with Crohn's disease is characterized by a type 1 helper T cell response and elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-12. We report our clinical experience with a novel oral IL-12/IL-23 inhibitor (STA 5326) for the treatment of active Crohn's disease. Materials and Methods: We conducted an open-label, dose-escalating trial of the orally delivered small molecule immunomodulator STA 5326 in 73 patients with active Crohn's disease (Crohn's disease activity index [CDAI] 220-450, inclusive). Five cohorts of patients were treated for up to 4 weeks with 14 mg twice a day (bid), 35 mg daily (qd), 28 mg bid, 35 mg bid, or 70 mg qd. The endpoints of the study included safety and improvement in clinical activity measured by the CDAI and the Crohn's disease endoscopic index of severity. Results: STA 5326 was well tolerated. Reported adverse events were similar across dose cohorts. The most common (>15%) drug-related adverse events observed were dizziness, nausea, headache, and fatigue. Clinical activity at day 28/29 was observed at qd doses of 28 mg and above for the clinical endpoints of response and remission: 70 points or greater decrease in CDAI (range 42% - 82% of patients); 100 points or greater decrease in CDAI (range 38%-64% of patients), and CDAI

orrigendum to “Immunological priming induced by a two-dose series of H5N1 nfluenza antigen, administered alone or in combination with two different ormulations of AS03 adjuvant in adults: Results of a randomised single eterologous booster dose study at 15 months” Vaccine 29 (2011) 6408–6418] eorge Risi a,∗, Louise Frenetteb, Joanne M. Langleyc, Ping Lid, Dennis Riff e, ric Sheldonf, David W. Vaughnd, Louis Friesg

Balsalazide is a novel azo-bonded 5-aminosalicylic acid treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. The study objective was to compare symptomatic remission rates with balsalazide and mesalamine while controlling for extent of disease and time since diagnosis in patients with active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis.A total of 173 patients with sigmoidoscopically verified ulcerative colitis were randomized to 8 wk of double-blind treatment with balsalazide 6.75 g/day or mesalamine 2.4 g/day. Both treatments provided 2.4 g/day of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid. Patients maintained symptom diaries throughout the treatment period.Overall, 46% of balsalazide- and 44% of mesalamine-treated patients achieved symptomatic remission. Higher response rates were noted in newly diagnosed patients withor = 40 cm of disease (68% vs 61%) than in recently relapsed patients with40 cm of disease (36% vs 25%). The median time to symptomatic remission was 12 days shorter with balsalazide (25 days) than with mesalamine (37 days). Significantly more balsalazide patients showed sigmoidoscopic (p = 0.002), stool frequency (p = 0.006), rectal bleeding (p = 0.006), and physician's global assessment score (p = 0.013) improvement by 14 days than did mesalamine patients. Similar proportions of patients reported adverse events (54% vs 64%), which were most commonly related to the gastrointestinal and central and peripheral nervous systems.Balsalazide is an effective and safe treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Improvement of symptoms occurs considerably earlier with balsalazide than with mesalamine.

The primary purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of rabeprazole versus ranitidine in the treatment of patients with active duodenal ulcer disease.This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study enrolled 376 patients. Patients were randomly assigned to receive rabeprazole 20 mg administered once daily in the morning (q.a.m.) with matching ranitidine placebo twice daily (b.i.d.) (n = 188), or ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. with matching rabeprazole placebo q.a.m. (n = 188). Three visits were scheduled: wk 0 (baseline; days -3 to -1), wk 2 (day 15+/-3 days), and wk 4 (day 29+/-3 days). The primary efficacy response variable was defined as complete regeneration of the mucosa at the site of all ulcers identified during the study. Secondary efficacy variables included patients' ratings of frequency and severity of ulcer pain, frequency of antacid use, and improvement of overall physical well-being. Tolerability was evaluated with analyses of adverse events, laboratory evaluations, fasting serum gastrin levels, vital signs, body weight, and electrocardiograms.Up to 4 wk of treatment with rabeprazole 20 mg q.a.m. produced significantly greater healing rates, compared to treatment with ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. (83% vs 73%; p = 0.017). Significant differences between treatment groups were also observed for secondary efficacy indices. At wk 2, rabeprazole was more likely than ranitidine to produce complete resolution of duodenal ulcer pain (39% vs 25%; p = 0.006), improvement in duodenal ulcer nighttime pain severity (76% vs 65%; p = 0.044), and improvement in overall well-being (55% vs 41%; p = 0.009). At wk 4, the proportion of patients with normalization of overall well-being was significantly higher in the rabeprazole group than in the ranitidine group (45% vs 29%; p = 0.003). Rabeprazole was safe and well tolerated in this study.In patients with active duodenal ulcer disease, rabeprazole 20 mg q.a.m. is superior to ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. in healing, resolving ulcer pain frequency, improving nighttime pain severity, and improving overall well-being. Rabeprazole is an effective and well-tolerated alternative treatment for patients with active duodenal ulcer disease.

ContextPrevious studies have shown oseltamivir, a neuraminidase inhibitor, to be effective in preventing influenza and treating experimental influenza.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of oseltamivir in the treatment of naturally acquired influenza infection.DesignRandomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study conducted January through March 1998.SettingSixty primary care and university health centers throughout the United States.ParticipantsA total of 629 healthy nonimmunized adults aged 18 to 65 years with febrile respiratory illness of no more than 36 hours' duration with temperature of 38°C or more plus at least 1 respiratory symptom and 1 constitutional symptom.InterventionsIndividuals were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups with identical appearing pills: oral oseltamivir phosphate, 75 mg twice daily (n = 211) or 150 mg (n = 209) twice daily, or placebo (n = 209).Main Outcome MeasuresDuration and severity of illness in individuals infected with influenza.ResultsTwo individuals withdrew before receiving medication and were excluded from further analyses. A total of 374 individuals (59.6%) were infected with influenza. Their duration of illness was reduced by more than 30% with both oseltamivir, 75 mg twice daily (median, 71.5 hours; P