Search

Simple Summary: PD-L1 expression determines patients' eligibility for immunotherapy. Current sampling does not consider the heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) within the primary tumor. Moreover, potential differences are not considered when comparing primary tumors and their associated metastases or local recurrences, hereby excluding potential responders to immunotherapy. Here, we investigated the inter-sample heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression by analyzing multiple samples from individual patients. Multisection staining revealed clinically relevant CPS changes, which would have potentially affected treatment decisions in 28.7% (intra-tumoral), 44.4% (tumor vs. metastases), and 61.5% (initial tumor vs. local recurrence) of patients, respectively, compared with single-region staining. Increased CPS in primary tumors and lymph node metastases were associated with improved 5-year overall survival. Our results suggest that multiple tumor sections should be evaluated in HNSCC patients when assessing PD-L1 expression prior to potential immunotherapy, particularly if the initial result was negative. For practical reasons, in many studies PD-L1 expression is measured by combined positive score (CPS) from a single tumor sample. This does not reflect the heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We investigated the extent and relevance of PD-L1 expression heterogeneity in HNSCC analyzing primary tumors and recurrences (LRs), as well as metastases. Tumor tissue from 200 HNSCC patients was immunohistochemically stained for PD-L1 and analyzed using image-analysis software QuPath v3.4 with multiple specimens per patient. CPS was ≥20 in 25.6% of primary tumors. Intra-tumoral heterogeneity led to a therapeutically relevant underestimation of PD-L1 expression in 28.7% of patients, when only one specimen per patient was analyzed. Inter-tumoral differences in PD-L1 expression between primary tumors and lymph node metastasis (LNM) or LR occurred in 44.4% and 61.5% (CPS) and in 40.6% and 50% of cases (TPS). Overall survival was increased in patients with CPS ≥ 1 vs. CPS < 1 in primary tumors and LNM (hazard ratio: 0.46 and 0.35; p < 0.005); CPS in LR was not prognostic. Our analysis shows clinically relevant intra- and inter-sample heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in HNSCC. To account for heterogeneity and improve patient selection for immunotherapy, multiple sample analyses should be performed, particularly in patients with CPS/TPS < 1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To improve management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients, we need to increase our understanding of carcinogenesis, to identify biomarkers, and drug targets. This study aimed to identify novel biomarkers by providing transcriptomics profiles of matched primary tumors, lymph node metastasis, and non-malignant tissue of 20 HNSCC patients as well as by bioinformatic analyses of a TCGA HNSCC cohort, comprising 554 patients. We provide cancer cell signaling networks differentially expressed in tumors versus metastases, such as mesenchymal–epithelial transition, and structural integrity networks. As a proof of principle study, we exploited the data sets and performed functional analyses of a novel cytokeratin, cytokeratin24 (cKRT24), which had not been described as biomarker for tumors before. Survival analysis revealed that low cKRT24 expression correlated with poor overall survival in HNSCC. Experimentally, downregulation of cKRT24 in primary tumors, metastases, and HNSCC cell lines was verified on mRNA and protein level. Cloning and ectopic overexpression of cKRT24 not only affected viability and growth of HNSSC cell lines, but also inhibited tumor growth in murine xenograft studies. We conclude that cKRT24 functions as a tumor suppressor in HNSCC, and may serve as an additional prognostic biomarker and novel target to support current HNSCC treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: With a prevalence of 0.55% to 4%, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a relevant part of the daily work of German otolaryngologists. The aim of the questionnaire-based data collection was to assess the current treatment status of CRSwNP in Germany., Material and Methods: For this purpose, 24 questions within an anonymized online questionnaire were sent to all German ENT departments., Results: Of 160 contacted ENT departments, 50 participated in the survey (31.3%). Among these, 76% performed more than 100 sinus surgeries annually and 38% treated more than 50 patients with biologics. Saline irrigations (80%) and intranasal glucocorticoids (GCS, 96%) were the most common conservative therapies. Systemic GCSs (52%) and intranasal GCS irrigation (20%) were less common. 80% of departments used biologics in the therapy of CRSwNP with an overall preference for dupilumab (70%). For therapy of aspirin intolerance, biologics (52%) were preferred to aspirin desensitization (26%). Prior to treatment with biologics clinical workup included the nasal polyp score (90%), the SNOT-22 questionnaire (84%), surrogate markers of type 2 inflammation (60%-72%), and computer tomography (50%). Final treatment success was assessed after 24 weeks (50%)., Conclusion: Mostly, the responding departments followed German and European recommendations for diagnosis and therapy of CRSwNP. Therapy with biologics is widely used. The value of preoperative systemic GCS and the frequent performance of CT before initiation of therapy with a biologic should be debated in regard to its currently widespread use., Competing Interests: L. Klimek berichtet über Zuschüsse und/oder Honorare von Allergopharma, Novartis, MEDA/Mylan, HAL Allergie, ALK Abelló, LETI Pharma, Stallergenes, Quintiles, Sanofi, ASIT Biotech, Lofarma, Allergy Therapeut., AstraZeneca, GSK, Inmunotk, außerhalb der eingereichten Arbeit; und Mitgliedschaft bei folgenden Organisationen: AeDA, DGHNO, Deutsche Akademie für Allergologie und klinische Immunologie, HNO-BV GPA, EAACI. S. Becker und B. Ernst berichten über Honorare für Beratung und Vorträge von GSK und Sanofi. E. Deuß, J. Eckrich, T. Hussain, S. Lang und M. Meyer haben keine Interessenkonflikte im Zusammenhang mit der vorliegenden Arbeit., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Due to heterogeneous data, the indication for elective neck dissection (END) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx and oropharynx (HPSCC and OPSCC) in stages T1/2N0 is somewhat unclear. Therefore, in this multicenter study, we performed detailed analysis of the metastatic behavior of HPSCC and OPSCC., Material and Methods: The nodal metastatic patterns of 262 HPSCC and OPSCC patients who had undergone surgery was retrospectively investigated. In addition, recurrence-free and overall survival were recorded. Furthermore, a systematic literature review on the topic was completed., Results: In patients with HPSCC, a discrepancy between clinical and pathologic N status was recorded in 62.1% of patients vs. 52.4% for p16- OPSCC, and 43.6% for p16+ OPSCC. The occult metastasis rate in cT1/2cN0 primary tumors was 38.9% for HPSCC vs. 17.8% (p16- OPSCC) and 11.1% (p16+ OPSCC). Contralateral metastases occurred in 22.2% of cases for HPSCC at stages cT1/2cN0, compared to only 9.1% for p16- OPSCC, and 0% for p16+ OPSCC patients.Patients with p16+ OPSCC had better recurrence-free and overall survival than p16- OPSCC and HPSCC patients. A direct association between patient survival and the extent of neck surgical therapy could not be demonstrated in our patients., Conclusion: Patients with HPSCC are at risk for bilateral neck metastases from stage cT1/2cN0, justifying bilateral END. Patients with T1/2 OPSCC present with occult metastases ipsilaterally in >20% of cases; however, the risk for contralateral occult metastasis is <10%. Hence, in strictly lateralized cT1/2CN0 tumors, omission of contralateral END may be considered., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Background: Salivary gland diseases are an important part of the work of ENT physicians in hospitals. The treatment strategies depend, among other things, on the doctrine at the respective location., Objective: The aim of this questionnaire-based study was to assess the current diagnostic workup and therapeutic strategies for salivary gland diseases in German otorhinolaryngology departments., Materials and Methods: A survey was performed using a 25-question online questionnaire sent to all German otorhinolaryngology department directors., Results: The questionnaire was answered by 92 of 175 otorhinolaryngology departments (52.6%). In the diagnosis of salivary gland tumors, a dominance of sonography and MRI was shown. Fine- and core-needle aspiration were not performed by more than 50% of the clinics. The dominant technique for parotidectomy was under microscopic control (82%). In 99% of clinics, EMG was used during resection of the parotid gland for intraoperative monitoring of the facial nerve. There was a trend towards performing partial parotidectomies (85%), lateral parotidectomies (70%), and extracapsular dissections (57%) for benign tumors of the parotid gland. The treatment concepts for malignant tumors were inconsistent., Conclusion: In particular, the treatment strategy and extent of surgery for benign and malignant salivary gland tumors differed depending on location. The choice of palliative (drug) therapy was also diverse. Prospective multicenter studies could help to develop evidence-based treatment strategies., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)