Search

Background and Aims: Three phases (dissection, anhepatic, and neohepatic) exist for propofol pharmacokinetics during liver transplantation (LT), resulting in varying cardiac output, volume of distribution, and drug metabolism. The primary objective was to compare the mean target concentration of propofol required to maintain the bispectral index (BIS) between 40 and 60 during three phases of LT by using a target-controlled infusion of total intravenous anaesthesia (TCI-TIVA). Methods: In this prospective, observational study, 20 adult patients diagnosed with chronic liver disease scheduled for live-donor LT were included. After anaesthesia induction and tracheal intubation, BIS-guided propofol infusion was started using TCI-TIVA with target plasma concentration (TPC) set initially at 2.5 μg/mL in all patients using the Marsh model. The TPC was decreased or increased by 0.2 μg/mL whenever the BIS values were persistently below 40 or above 60 for 15 minutes. Data were analysed using ANOVA and repeated measure ANOVA, followed by a post-hoc test. Results: The mean TPC was significantly higher during dissection [2.12 (Standard deviation (SD): 0.63 μg/mL)] as compared to anhepatic and neohepatic phases [1.29 (SD: 0.65) μg/mL and 1.35 (SD: 0.54) μg/mL], respectively (P < 0.001). A significant difference was observed between dissection and anhepatic (mean difference: -0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.98, -0.75) or dissection and neohepatic phase (mean difference: -0.77 (95% CI: -1.02, -0.53). The propofol dose was significantly higher in dissection compared to the anhepatic and neohepatic phases (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The propofol's mean TPC when using TCI-TIVA decreased in the anhepatic and neohepatic phases to 61% and 63.7% of the dissection phase, respectively. Keywords: Cardiac output, entropy, haemodynamic, liver cirrhosis, liver transplantation, pharmacokinetics, propofol, target control infusion, target plasma concentration, total intravenous anaesthesia, Author(s): Neha Garg (corresponding author) [1]; Yatin Kalra [2]; Shivali Panwar [2]; Mahesh K. Arora [2]; Udit Dhingra [2] INTRODUCTION Propofol has been successfully used in liver transplants for induction [...]

Background and Objectives: The second peak of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) experienced by India in April-May 2021 overwhelmed the health care system. A severe shortage of oxygen was experienced, and it was realized that some method of estimating the oxygen consumption should be available in order to streamline the distribution network of oxygen. Methods: In this paper, the authors propose a method of estimating the daily oxygen consumption for a hospital based on different formulae used to calculate oxygen consumption by various oxygen therapy devices. The proposed method was tested for its accuracy by measuring the actual oxygen consumption during the same period on the basis of pressure gauge readings difference observed on the liquid oxygen tank. The estimated and actual oxygen consumption was calculated each day for a period of 10 days. Results: The mean estimated oxygen consumption was 1.26±0.11 metric Tonne (MT), and the actual consumption was 1.34±0.08 MT. The estimated and actual consumption had a positive and significant correlation between them (correlation coefficient of 0.699). Reliability analysis performed using the Cronbach’s alpha revealed a factor of 0.94 as a coefficient between both variables indicating that the actual and calculated oxygen consumptions are nearly equal. The Bland and Altman analysis revealed a good agreement. Interpretation and Conclusions: It is concluded that the total oxygen requirement can be reliably estimated based on the proposed formulae, which can be useful to estimate the oxygen consumption of different hospitals, and plan the distribution of oxygen in a city or a district as a part of preparedness to deal with future surges of COVID-19 infections, if any. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, blood loss, renal function, and duration of surgery with and without temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS) in live donor liver transplantation (LT) recipients. Secondary objectives were postoperative early graft dysfunction, morbidity, mortality, total intensive care unit, and hospital stay. Background: Blood loss during recipient hepatectomy for LT remains a major concern. Routine use of TPCS during LT is not yet elucidated. Methods: This study is a single-center, open-label, randomized control trial. The sample size was calculated based on intraoperative blood loss. After exclusion, a total of 60 patients, 30 in each arm (TPCS vs no TPCS) were recruited in the trial. Results: The baseline recipient and donor characteristics were comparable between the groups. The median intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.004) and blood product transfusions (P < 0.05) were significantly less in the TPCS group. The TPCS group had significantly improved intraoperative hemodynamics in the anhepatic phase as compared with the no TPCS group (P < 0.0001), requiring significantly less vasopressor support. This led to significantly better renal function as evidenced by higher intraoperative urine output in the TPCS group (P = 0.002). Because of technical simplicity, the TPCS group had significantly fewer inferior vena cava injuries (3.3 vs 26.7%, P = 0.026) and substantially shorter hepatectomy time and total duration of surgery (529.4 ± 35.54 vs 606.83 ± 48.13 min, P < 0.0001). The time taken for normalization of lactate in the immediate postoperative period was significantly shorter in the TPCS group (median, 6 vs 13 h; P = 0.04). Although postoperative endotoxemia, major morbidity, 90-day mortality, total intensive care unit, and hospital stay were comparable between both groups, tolerance to enteral feed was earlier in the TPCS group. Conclusions: In live donor LT, TPCS is a simple and effective technique that provides superior intraoperative hemodynamics and reduces blood loss and duration of surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One of the damage control strategies used to avoid or treat abdominal compartment syndrome is "open abdomen (OA)," where the facial edges and the skin is left open, exposing the abdominal viscera. Although it reduces the mortality both in trauma and non-trauma abdominal complications, it does create a significant challenge in an intensive care setting, as it has physiological consequences that need early recognition and prompt treatment both in the intensive care unit and in the operating room. The article aims to review literature on "open abdomen," describe the challenges in such cases, and proposes a guideline for the intensivist in managing a patient with an OA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The early post-transplant period after liver transplantation is critical, as recipients are highly susceptible to sepsis due to their immune-compromised state. This study aimed to identify the association between preoperative procalcitonin and early post-transplant sepsis and mortality at one month after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT)., Methodology: All patients who underwent LDLT from July 2021 to December 2021 were recruited prospectively. Participants were divided into two groups based on preoperative PCT levels: elevated (>0.5 ng/ml) and low levels (<0.5 ng/ml). Serum procalcitonin (PCT) levels were measured on the day of transplant and on postoperative days 3 and 7. The relationship between preoperative PCT and post-transplant sepsis was evaluated using a Chi-square test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated., Results: Sepsis occurred in 48.3% of patients, with a significant association between elevated preoperative PCT levels and early post-transplant sepsis (p=0.023). The ROC curve for preoperative PCT showed moderate predictive ability (area under curve (AUC)=0.664), while PCT levels on postoperative day 3 demonstrated better discriminatory power (AUC=0.790). PCT levels measured on day 7 also had good diagnostic accuracy, with an AUC of 0.843 and a significant difference between the sepsis and non-sepsis groups (p=0.002). The length of ICU stay was significantly longer in the sepsis group (p=0.009).  Conclusion: Elevated preoperative PCT levels can predict early post-transplant sepsis in LDLT patients. PCT monitoring may enhance risk stratification and guide perioperative management, improving post-transplant outcomes., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethics Committee at Institute of Liver and Biliary sciences, New Delhi issued approval IEC/2020/73/NA05. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Satija et al.)

Introduction Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is vital for diagnosing and treating biliary and pancreatic diseases, necessitating deep sedation typically achieved through total intravenous anesthesia. Propofol, with its favorable pharmacokinetic profile, is the preferred sedative, but conventional administration methods of mg/kg boluses or infusion rates pose challenges. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems offer a solution that ensures precise dose delivery of propofol. Despite its widespread use, the literature lacks specific guidance on the target plasma concentration (Cp) of propofol for sedation in patients undergoing ERCP. Methods A prospective interventional study was conducted at the Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Delhi, India to determine the target Cp of propofol for sedation during ERCP. The study enrolled 86 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II patients aged 18-70 years. The primary objective was to establish the optimal propofol concentration for sedation as guided by a bispectral index (BIS) value of 60-70. Secondary outcomes included induction time, recovery time, total propofol consumption, and the occurrence of adverse events (if any). The Marsh pharmacokinetic model guided the TCI pump, adjusting Cp until the target sedation was achieved. Results The mean Cp of propofol to maintain the BIS value 60-70 was 2.21 ± 0.42 µg/ml. Age-wise analysis revealed variations, emphasizing the need for individualized dosing. Induction time was 4.21 ± 0.68 minutes; recovery times were seven minutes (median, IQR: 5-10 minutes) for BIS >80 and seven minutes (median, IQR: 5-10 minutes) for achieving a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score of ≥5. The mean propofol consumption was 6.24 mg/kg/hr. Side effects were minimal, with 1.16% experiencing transient hypoxia and hypotension. Conclusion The study establishes a mean target propofol concentration of 2.21 ± 0.42 µg/ml for sedation in ASA I and II patients undergoing ERCP., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethics Committee, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences issued approval IEC/2023/102/MA07. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, S et al.)

One of the damage control strategies used to avoid or treat abdominal compartment syndrome is "open abdomen (OA)," where the facial edges and the skin is left open, exposing the abdominal viscera. Although it reduces the mortality both in trauma and non-trauma abdominal complications, it does create a significant challenge in an intensive care setting, as it has physiological consequences that need early recognition and prompt treatment both in the intensive care unit and in the operating room. The article aims to review literature on "open abdomen," describe the challenges in such cases, and proposes a guideline for the intensivist in managing a patient with an OA. How to cite this article: Mitra LG, Saluja V, Dhingra U. Open Abdomen in a Critically Ill Patient. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(Suppl 4):S193-S200., Competing Interests: Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None, (Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.)