Search

Motzer et al [1] recently reported results for a primary disease-free survival (DFS) analysis of the PROTECT phase 3 trial in which pazopanib (starting dose 800 mg subsequently reduced to 600 mg once daily owing to the high treatment discontinuation rate) failed to show a DFS benefit (primary endpoint) compared to placebo in the adjuvant setting. These results are in line with those obtained in ASSURE and more generally with other trials evaluating the role of angiogenesis inhibitors in different malignancies such as colon and breast cancer and melanoma.

The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria have been largely adopted in clinical practice. In a recent retrospective study, we assessed that the addition of the first site of metastatic disease to brain, bone, and liver improves prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Here, we performed an external validation in patients with mRCC. Our aim was to evaluate if the addition of a new independent variable could improve IMDC prognosis prediction and reduce heterogeneity within risk categories.We selected all 1073 patients treated at a single institution for mRCC and included in the Institute Gustave Roussy Renal Cell Carcinoma database. All patients included received at least 1 line of targeted therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Univariate and multivariate analyses (Cox regression model) were performed. Bootstrap validation of the final model was also carried out for internal validation. The IMDC modified classification was defined by the addition of the seventh variable, and we defined the modified IMDC good-risk criteria as 0 risks, intermediate-risk as 1 to 2 risks, and poor-risk as 3 or more risks.The presence of brain, bone, and/or liver as the first site of metastatic disease plus the other variables included in the IMDC score were statistically significant variables associated with overall survival (OS) after univariate and multivariate analysis and bootstrap validation. Finally, 122 (15%) patients had a modification of their initial risk category. The median OS in the poor-, intermediate-, and favorable-risk groups was 10, 26, and 52 months, respectively (P .001). The bias-corrected concordance index in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (n = 241) was 0.71.The addition of brain, bone, and/or liver metastases as an additional variable to the other IMDC variables improves the prognostic predictive power of the model.

Introduction: Monoclonal antibodies directed against programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) and its ligand (anti-PD-L1) showed a significant efficacy among different immunogenic metastatic tumors such as melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) dependent on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs), immune-related liver diseases are uncommon and a definitive diagnosis is not always feasible. Areas covered: We revised data from phase II/III clinical trials and real-world retrospective analyses on liver-related adverse events induced by anti-PD-1 (nivolumab/pembrolizumab) and anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab) in advanced cancer populations (melanoma, NSCLC and RCC). Furthermore, we described clinical-pathological patterns of immune-related liver diseases in real-life. Expert opinion: Use of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 led to a paradigm shift in the management of patients with melanoma, NSCLC and RCC. IrAEs can occur potentially in any tissue, leading to discontinuation of ICPIs, at least in a small proportion of these patients, and to a negative impact on their prognosis. Hepatobiliary immune-related adverse events are underestimated due to inappropriate monitoring. Development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for cancer patients receiving ICPIs as well as the identification of predictive biomarkers of liver injury could allow a better patients’ selection and improve clinical outcomes of immune-related liver diseases.

Purpose: Artificial Intelligence (AI) involves several and different techniques able to elaborate a large amount of data responding to a specific planned outcome. There are several possible applications of this technology in neuro-oncology. Methods: We reviewed, according to PRISMA guidelines, available studies adopting AI in different fields of neuro-oncology including neuro-radiology, pathology, surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic treatments. Results: Neuro-radiology presented the major number of studies assessing AI. However, this technology is being successfully tested also in other operative settings including surgery and radiation therapy. In this context, AI shows to significantly reduce resources and costs maintaining an elevated qualitative standard. Pathological diagnosis and development of novel systemic treatments are other two fields in which AI showed promising preliminary data. Conclusion: It is likely that AI will be quickly included in some aspects of daily clinical practice. Possible applications of these techniques are impressive and cover all aspects of neuro-oncology.

Se conoce que es una expresión no incluida en los estudios sobre construcciones en proceso de fijación. En este estudio, se dedica una primera parte a su descripción sintáctica, a su definición en los diccionarios, a la percepción que de ella tienen los hablantes y a los contextos en los que aparece. En la segunda parte, a través del análisis de algunos ejemplos, se propone un acercamiento a su comportamiento macrosintáctico y discursivo. Se ve cómo puede desempeñar una función evidencial y verbalizar el grado de compromiso e implicación del hablante con respecto al enunciado.

In the past few years several hormonal agents have been tested in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) leading to an impressive improvement in terms of metastases-free survival (MFS). We performed a meta-analysis aimed to: (1) estimate the pooled effect of new hormonal compounds in terms of MFS, overall survival (OS) in overall and specific subpopulations; and (2) estimate the effect of high-grade toxicities of these drugs. We identified 881 studies published between January 1, 2010 and February 16, 2018 on PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Three randomized placebo controlled clinical trials were selected (PROSPER, SPARTAN, and ARAMIS). Because of the absence of individual data, all of the analyses performed were made on aggregated data provided in selected studies. We used the inverse variance technique for the meta-analysis of the hazard ratios collected for MFS and OS analysis. Fixed and randomized models were used. Relative risk and 95% confidence intervals and risk difference were estimated considering the number of Grade 3 adverse events in treatment and control arms. Administration of new hormonal compounds in nmCRPC patients led to a significant benefit in MFS in the overall population and in all subgroups analyzed. These agents might also improve OS but longer follow-up is needed to confirm this hypothesis. Indeed results of OS analysis should be carefully evaluated because none of the studies selected provided mature OS data. Administration of these agents resulted in a significant increased risk of treatment-related death, high cardiovascular toxicity, hypertension, fractures, and falls. Administration of new hormonal compounds prolongs the time of metastases occurrence and might prolong also survival in patients with nmCRPC. Treatment-related toxicity is an important issue because these agents increase the risk of death, cardiovascular toxicity, hypertension, fractures, and risk of falls.

CONTEXT: 9p loss appears a reliable and promising marker able to differentiate specific categories of patients with renal cell carcinoma associated with a worse prognosis. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to systematically evaluate relative risk of death, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) among patients harboring 9p loss. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We found a total of 92 potentially relevant articles focused on the detection of 9p loss in patients with renal cell carcinoma and clinical outcomes of this population. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were employed to carry out this work. Fourteen studies resulted to be eligible for this analysis; 11 of these reported data on 5-year overall survival, six on CSS and four on DFS. An increased risk of death has been observed in patients harboring 9p loss (pooled relative risk of 3.965; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.647-5.940, p

One of the most attractive cancer-related genes under investigation is BAP1. Reasons of this growing interest are related to the wide spectrum of pathways directly or indirectly modulated by this gene and shared by several solid tumors. Programmed cell-death, cell metabolisms, immune cells development, ferroptosis and defects in DNA damage response are only some of the multitude of processes depending on BAP1. Loss of this gene seems to occur in different times of tumor history. Moreover, times of BAP1 loss strongly diverge among primary tumors suggesting the presence of several and different triggering factors. Regardless of when it happens, BAP1 loss usually results in prognosis worsening and in the acquisition of more aggressive clinical features by cancer cells.

Despite several clinical trials have assessed different agents in the adjuvant setting, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) still remains a disease orphan of an effective adjuvant treatment. In fact, systemic therapies targeting angiogenesis that have been observed to be effective in metastatic setting failed to show an improvement in terms of clinical outcomes when used ad adjuvant treatments. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis of 5 randomized clinical trials to assess the impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting angiogenesis after surgery: ASSURE, S-TRAC, PROTECT, ATLAS, SORCE. Among the 6,531 patients assessed, we confirmed the lack of efficacy of adjuvant treatments in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) (pooled-HR 0.93, 95% CI, 0.84-1.02, P=0.16) and overall survival (OS) (pooled-HR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.88-1.09, P=0.54). To the best of our knowledge, we still ignore why some treatments active in the metastatic setting do not show similar efficacy as adjuvant treatment. Exploring possible reasons of this apparently conflicting results is important as it may offer new insights that should be evaluated in next generation adjuvant trials. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have reported significant results-as monotherapy or in combinations with other anticancer agents-in metastatic setting, and the results of trials evaluating these agents in the adjuvant setting are awaited.

Background: Non-canonical mutations of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genes have been described in about 20–25% and 5–12% of patients with WHO grade II and III gliomas, respectively. To date, the prognostic value of these rare mutations is still a topic of debate. Methods: We selected patients with WHO grade II and III gliomas and IDH1 mutations with available tissue samples for next-generation sequencing. The clinical outcomes and baseline behaviors of patients with canonical IDH1 R132H and non-canonical IDH1 mutations were compared. Results: We evaluated 433 patients harboring IDH1 mutations. Three hundred and ninety patients (90.1%) had a canonical IDH1 R132H mutation while 43 patients (9.9%) had a non-canonical IDH1 mutation. Compared to those with the IDH1 canonical mutation, patients with non-canonical mutations were younger (p &lt, 0.001) and less frequently presented the 1p19q codeletion (p = 0.017). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the extension of surgery (p = 0.003), the presence of the 1p19q codeletion (p = 0.001), and the presence of a non-canonical mutation (p = 0.041) were variables correlated with improved overall survival. Conclusion: the presence of non-canonical IDH1 mutations could be associated with improved survival among patients with IDH1 mutated grade II–III glioma.

Background A synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is a substitution of a single base that does not modify the primary amino acid sequence but could influence protein function. In patients with brain tumors, the incidence of the silent SNP IDH 1 105GGT (rs11554137) is three times higher than the normal population. Methods Our aim was to investigate the prognostic role of the IDH 1 105GGT SNP. We selected only patients with diagnosis of IDH grade II or III mutated glioma. Additional inclusion criteria were: complete clinical data and adequate tumor samples for IDH 1 or 2 sequencing. Results 71 patients with grade II and III IDH-mutated glioma have been evaluated. Nine of 71 patients (12.7 %) presented the SNP 105GGT. Patients with SNP 105GGT had a longer Progression Free Survival (PFS - 47.3 months vs Not reached; p = 0.015). The SNP 105GGT (HR 0.240; 95 %CI 0.074−0.784, p = 0.018) was confirmed as an independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. Conclusions Patients with IDH1 or 2 mutated grade II and III glioma presenting the SNP105GGT had longer PFS regardless adjuvant treatment received and extension of primary surgery. A validation is warranted to confirm our preliminary results.

Introduction: Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive brain tumor with an extremely poor prognosis. Genetic characterization of this tumor has identified alterations with prognostic and therapeutic impact, and many efforts are being made to improve molecular knowledge on glioblastoma. Invasive procedures, such as tumor biopsy or radical resection, are needed to characterize the tumor. Areas covered: The role of microRNA in cancer is an expanding field of research as many microRNAs have been shown to correlate with patient prognosis and treatment response. Novel methodologies like radiomics, radiogenomics, and radiomiRNomics are under evaluation to improve the amount of prognostic and predictive biomarkers available. Expert opinion: The role of radiomics, radiogenomics, and radiomiRNomic for the characterization of glioblastoma will further improve in the coming years.

International audience; Overall, tumors of primary central nervous system (CNS) are quite common in adults with an incidence rate close to 30 new cases/100,000 inhabitants per year. Significant clinical and biological advances have been accomplished in the most common adult primary CNS tumors (i.e., diffuse gliomas). However, most CNS tumor subtypes are rare with an incidence rate below the threshold defining rare disease of 6.0 new cases/100,000 inhabitants per year. Close to 150 entities of primary CNS tumors have now been identified by the novel integrated histomolecular classification published by the World Health Organization (WHO) and its updates by the c-IMPACT NOW consortium (the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy). While these entities can be better classified into smaller groups either by their histomolecular features and/or by their location, assessing their treatment by clinical trials and improving the survival of patients remain challenging. Despite these tumors are rare, research, and advances remain slower compared to diffuse gliomas for instance. In some cases (i.e., ependymoma, medulloblastoma) the understanding is high because single or few driver mutations have been defined. The European Union has launched European Reference Networks (ERNs) dedicated to support advances on the clinical side of rare diseases including rare cancers. The ERN for rare solid adult tumors is termed EURACAN. Within EURACAN, Domain 10 brings together the European patient advocacy groups (ePAGs) and physicians dedicated to improving outcomes in rare primary CNS tumors and also aims at supporting research, care and teaching in the field. In this review, we discuss the relevant biological and clinical characteristics, clinical management of patients, and research directions for the following types of rare primary CNS tumors: medulloblastoma, pineal region tumors, glioneuronal and rare glial tumors, ependymal tumors, grade III meningioma and mesenchymal tumors, primary central nervous system lymphoma, germ cell tumors, spinal cord tumors and rare pituitary tumors.

Background and Objectives: Several systemic treatments are available for metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) including docetaxel (D), abiraterone and prednisone (A + P) and new anti-androgens (NA). In our study we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing efficacy outcomes (survival and radiological-free survival), safety and survival on specific subgroups of patients. Methods: Outcomes of interest were: (i) Risk of death, biochemical and radiological progression among all patients. (ii) Risk of death according to different pathological/clinical features. (iii) Evaluation of the relative risk (RR) and risk difference of serious toxicity defined as adverse events (AEs) with grade ≥ 3 specific AEs. Hazard ratios (HRs) and RR were measures adopted for endpoints 1–3. Results: Overall, eight randomized trials were included in meta-analysis for a total of 9987 patients. Administration of D, A + P and NA resulted in improved overall survival (OS) and radiological progression-free survival (rPFS). Survival benefit was not confirmed in patients receiving NA and previously exposed to docetaxel (HR 0.948, 95% CI 0.671–1.338). Patients with visceral metastases and high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) did not benefit from NA treatment, while it seems that patients with low Gleason score do not benefit from A + P. NA showed the more favorable safety profile. Conclusion: NA may not provide survival benefit when adopted subsequently or in concomitant to D. Specific subgroups of patients may benefit more from A + P, D or NA. Safety profiles significantly differ among agents evaluated.

NA

Nivolumab is an effective and tolerable treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, showing longer median overall survival than everolimus and achieving a good percentage of objective response, stable disease, and prolonged responses. However, very few cases have been reported in the literature of a complete response to nivolumab in the metastatic pretreated setting. Here, we report a case of complete response to nivolumab in II line following sunitinib in a metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma with favorable risk according to the IMDC criteria. This is also an interesting case on the use of immunotherapy following a long period of antiangiogenetic therapy, underlining the importance of the sequence of treatment to achieve the best possible outcome in terms of prolonged overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response.

Background anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) overexpression and gene alterations have been detected in several malignancies, with prognostic and therapeutic implications. However, few studies investigated the correlation between ALK altered expression and prognosis in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Methods We performed an evaluation of ALK overexpression and structural/quantitative chromosome alterations through immune-histochemical assay (IHC with D5F3 antibody) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild type (wt) GBM. Assuming an ALK overexpression in 20 % of patients we planned a sample of 44 patients to achieve a probability of 90 % to include from 10 % to 30 % of patients with ALK alterations. Results We evaluated 44 patients with IDH wt GBM, treated in our institution and dead due to GBM progression in 2017. ALK overexpression obtained by a composed score (the product of IHC intensity staining and rate of positive cells) was observed in 19 (43 %) patients. FISH analysis showed that 11 patients (25 %) had gene deletion, 2 patients (4.5 %) had monosomy and one patient (2.3 %) presented polysomy. Only one patient (2.3 %) demonstrated ALK rearrangement. There was no statistical difference in median OS between patients with ALK-positive (mOS = 18.9 months) and ALK-negative IHC (mOS = 18.0 months). Conclusion We identified some rare previously unreported alterations of ALK gene in patients with IDH wt GBM. In these patients, the ALK overexpression does not influences survival.

not available

Management of metastatic or advanced prostate cancer has acquired several therapeutic approaches that have drastically changed the course of the disease. In particular due to the high sensitivity of prostate cancer cells to hormone depletion, several agents able to inhibit hormone production or binding to nuclear receptor have been evaluated and adopted in clinical practice. However, despite several hormonal treatments being available nowadays for the management of advanced or metastatic prostate cancer, the natural history of the disease leads inexorably to the development of resistance to hormone inhibition. Findings regarding the mechanisms that drive this process are of particular and increasing interest as these are potentially related to the identification of new targetable pathways and to the development of new drugs able to improve our patients’ clinical outcomes.

The development of new systemic agents has led us into a “golden era” of management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Certainly, the approval of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and the combination of these with targeted compounds has irreversibly changed clinical scenarios. A deeper knowledge of the molecular mechanisms that correlate with tumor development and progression has made this revolution possible. In this amazing era, novel challenges are awaiting us in the clinical management of metastatic RCC. Of these, the development of reliable criteria which are able to predict tumor response to treatment or primary and acquired resistance to systemic treatments still remain an unmet clinical need. Thanks to the availability of data provided by studies evaluating genomic assessments of the disease, this goal may no longer be out of reach. In this review, we summarize current knowledge about genomic alterations related to primary and secondary resistance to target therapy and immune-checkpoint inhibitors in RCC

Background: In human populations, a certain amount of data correlate obesity/body mass index (BMI) with urothelial cancer (UC) and prostate cancer (PCa) occurrence, however this is not fully elucidated at all stages of disease. In an attempt to shed light on uncertain areas in such field, in the present review we illustrate the main molecular mechanisms linking obesity and cancer, focusing on the correlation between obesity and tumor risk, disease progression and response to chemo- and immunotherapy in patients with UC and the predictive/prognostic role of obesity in PCa patients treated with the currently available therapeutic approaches. Methods: We did a large-scale literature search on existing scientific websites focusing on keywords “obesity”, “body mass index (BMI)”, “urothelial cancer”, “prostate cancer”, “docetaxel”, “cabazitaxel”, “abiraterone acetate”, “enzalutamide”, and “radium223”. Results: Many adipocytes-induced molecules support tumor proliferation through activation of various cellular pathways. The available evidence in the postoperative setting do the role of BMI in oncological outcomes prediction still not completely clear. Likewise, in metastatic UC patients controversial results link the role of obesity/BMI with clinical outcomes of tumor response to chemotherapy. Adipose stromal cells recruitment, induced by PCa cells, from white adipose tissue to the tumor sites inducing cell invasiveness was associated with poor survival. Conflicting data, although more oriented towards a better survival outcome, resulted in obese patients treated with docetaxel. In PCa cell-lines a certain cabazitaxel chemo resistance adipose stromal cells (ASC)-mediated was demonstrated. In metastatic castration-resistant PCa patients with high BMI (>25 kg/m2) receiving abiraterone acetate there were significant worse survival outcomes, while in enzalutamide patients BMI did not affect survival outcome. In radium 223 patients higher BMI significantly correlated with favorable overall survival. Conclusions: The main focus of this review was to understand the interplay between obesity/BMI and UC/PCa. Several pathogenic cellular pathways exploring the issue are discussed, opening the way to challenging tailored treatments on the basis of BMI. Improving the knowledge of molecular connections between obesity and UC and PCa could favor the development of new therapies likely reducing chemo- and immunotherapy drug resistance.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients has been common clinical practice due to evidence that resection of the primary tumor results in a survival benefit regardless of systemic treatment. Recently, the first large phase III randomized, non-inferiority prospective clinical trial evaluating this surgical approach demonstrated that systemic treatment alone was not inferior to primary surgery plus systemic treatment. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate if cytoreductive nephrectomy results in a survival benefit over systemic treatment alone in patients with mRCC and in specific subgroups, including patients with brain metastases, poor performance status, poor prognosis according to IMDC or MSKCC criteria, and clear cell and non-clear cell histologies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 16 published studies providing complete data for the comparison between cytoreductive nephrectomy + systemic treatment versus systemic treatment alone, and selected 9 for subgroup analysis. The inverse variance technique was applied for the meta-analysis of hazard ratios (HR), and, due to the intrinsic heterogeneity of the data, we adopted a random effects model. Risk of bias among the studies was estimated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RESULTS: Our analysis suggested a survival benefit for patients receiving cytoreductive nephrectomy (pooled HR of 0.48, 95% confidence interval of 0.42-0.56) in the overall population. Survival advantages were also observed in patients with clear cell and non-clear renal cell carcinoma, while no benefit was evident in patients with brain metastasis, poor performance status, and poor risk. CONCLUSION: Cytoreductive nephrectomy seems to result in a survival benefit in both clear cell and non-clear cell histology, while no survival advantage was found in patients with specific clinical features. Despite a high level of heterogeneity, our results highlight the importance of a good selection of patients to whom a primary surgical approach could be proposed.

Advances in understanding the mechanisms of tumour-induced immunosuppression have led to the development of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients, including those with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The optimal combination between immunotherapy and targeted agents (as well as the possible favourable sequential therapy of these two classes of drugs) remains an open question at this moment. Several trials are currently underway to assess the combination of anti-programmed-death 1 (PD-1) or anti-PD-ligand(L)1 agents with other immunotherapies or with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In this editorial, we described the results of the most recent clinical trials on the use of immunotherapies in RCC and the emerging data on the research for reliable biomarkers of tumour response in this setting. In addition, we have focused on the role of the gut microbiome and tumour microenvironment in the development of future therapeutic strategies for RCC patients.

Management of localized and advanced prostate cancer benefits from several therapeutic options with a surprising improvement in terms of clinical outcome. The selection of patients more likely to benefit from a specific approach still remains a key issue as well as the early identification of patients with aggressive disease which could benefit from a more aggressive treatment strategy. The lack of reliable bio-marker in castration resistant setting able to monitor response to treatment and early inform about tumor progression is an emerging issue. Accordingly, circulating DNA and circulating tumor cells appears a promising and attractive approach despite to date practical applications of these techniques are few and not validated. The aim of this review of the literature is to explore current knowledge on liquid biopsy in prostate cancer focusing on possible future applications.

The human microbiome is gaining increasing attention in the medical community, as knowledge on its role not only in health but also in disease development and response to therapies is expanding. Furthermore, the connection between the microbiota and cancer, especially the link between the gut microbiota and gastrointestinal tumors, is becoming clearer. The interaction between the microbiota and the response to chemotherapies and, more recently, to immunotherapy has been widely studied, and a connection between a peculiar type of microbiota and a better response to these therapies and a different incidence in toxicities has been hypothesized. As knowledge on the gut microbiota increases, interest in the residing microbial population in other systems of our body is also increasing. Consequently, the urinary microbiota is under evaluation for its possible implications in genitourinary diseases, including cancer. Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in the male population; thus, research regarding its etiology and possible factors correlated to disease progression or the response to specific therapies is thriving. This review has the purpose to recollect the current knowledge on the relationship between the human microbiota and prostate cancer.