Search

Background: Different definitions of disability progression by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) may influence frequency and/or time to event., Methods: In this multicenter cohort study, we included PPMS patients with follow-up ≥24 months and ≥3 available EDSS scores overall (≥1 per year). We applied 672 definitions of disability progression including different minimal EDSS increase, required confirmation and fixed/roving-baseline score., Results: We analyzed follow-up periods from 131 PPMS patients (median age at baseline 53.0 years [45.0 - 63.0], 51.9 % female, median follow-up 3.9 years [2.6 - 6.0], median baseline EDSS 4.0 [2.5 - 6.0]). The most sensitive definition of a progression event was an unconfirmed increase of ≥0.5 points with a roving baseline (81.8 % event rate). The least sensitive definition was an increase of ≥1.0 points with a fixed baseline, minimal distance to reference 48 weeks, and confirmed at ≥48 weeks (28.4 % event rate). Comparing roving vs. fixed baseline over all cutoffs and confirmation definitions, average time to progression was 227 days shorter applying the roving baseline (1405 days [550 - 2653] vs. 1632 days [760 - 2653])., Conclusions: Different definitions of disability progression result in significantly differing rates of disability progression, which may influence study results and create confusion in clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Gabriel Bsteh: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. He has received unrestricted research grants from Celgene/BMS and Novartis. Stefanie Marti: nothing to disclose. Nik Krajnc: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from BMS/Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi-Genzyme and held a grant for a Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Training Fellowship Programme from the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS). Gerhard Traxler: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. Anke Salmen: received speaker honoraria for activities with Bristol Myers Squibb, CSL Behring, Novartis, and Roche, and research support by the Baasch Medicus Foundation, the Medical Faculty of the University of Bern and the Swiss MS Society. Helly Hammer: has received speaker/advisor honorary from Merck, Biogen, Janssen, Teva. She received research support within the last 5 years from Biogen. She received travel grants from Almirall, Biogen, Roche, Janssen, Merck. Fritz Leutmezer: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Actelion, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene, Johnson&Johnson, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. Paulus Rommer: has received honoraria for consultancy/speaking from AbbVie, Allmiral, Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, has received research grants from Amicus, Biogen, Merck, Roche. Franziska Di Pauli: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene BMS, Horizon, Johnson&Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, and Roche. Her institution has received research grants from Roche. Andrew Chan: has received speakers’/board honoraria from Actelion (Janssen/J&J), Alexion, Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene (BMS), Genzyme, Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), Novartis, Roche, and Teva, all for hospital research funds. He received research support from Biogen, CSL Behring, Genzyme, and UCB, the European Union, and the Swiss National Foundation. Thomas Berger: has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Bayer, Biogen, Bionorica, BMS/Celgene, Genesis, GSK, GW/Jazz Pharma, Horizon, Janssen-Cilag, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva and UCB. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Biogen, Bayer, BMS/Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva. Harald Hegen: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Siemens and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. Robert Hoepner: has received speaker/advisor honorary from Merck, Novartis, Roche, Biogen, Alexion, Sanofi, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Teva/Mepha and Almirall. He received research support within the last 5 years from Roche, Merck, Sanofi, Biogen, Chiesi, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. He also received research grants from the Swiss MS Society, the SITEM Insel Support Fund and is a member of the Advisory Board of the Swiss and International MS Society. He also serves as deputy editor in chief for Journal of Central Nervous System disease. All conflicts are not related to this work., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Prognostication in patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) can be challenging. The aim of this study was to assess whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) red blood cell (RBC) count and total protein (TP) concentration are associated with SAH prognosis., Methods: Patients with SAH treated at the neurological intensive care unit (ICU) in Innsbruck were included in this real-world, observational study. Longitudinal CSF samples were collected as part of routine diagnostics. RBC count and CSF TP at the time of admission (RBC first , TP first ), in Week 1 (RBC Days1-7 , TP Days1-7 ), Week 2 (RBC Days8-14 , TP Days8-14 ), and Week 3 or thereafter (RBC Day>14 , TP Day>14 ), the highest detected value (RBC highest , TP highest ), as well as the RBC count adjusted for disease duration (RBC adjusted ) were assessed. Primary outcomes were good functional outcome after 3 months, defined as modified Rankin scale score ≤2 and ICU survival., Results: A total of 183 SAH patients with a female predominance (69%), a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 60 (50-70) years and median (IQR) Hunt and Hess score of 4 (3-5) were included. Multivariable analyses revealed that lower values of RBC first , RBC adjusted , RBC highest , TP first and TP highest were associated with good functional outcome and hospital survival. Lower TP concentrations in Weeks 1, 2 and 3 were associated with good functional outcome, and in Weeks 1 and 2 with ICU survival. Early RBC measurements (Week 1) were associated with good functional outcome and ICU survival., Conclusions: Low CSF RBC counts and TP concentrations were associated with good functional outcome and ICU survival in a real-world cohort of SAH patients requiring external ventricular drainage., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Objectives: Isolated value of MRI metrics in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) as a surrogate marker of response to disease-modifying treatment (DMT) and, thus, as decision criteria for DMT escalation in the absence of clinical signs of disease activity is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to investigate whether DMT escalation based on isolated MRI activity affects clinical outcome., Methods: Combining data from 5 MS centers in Austria and Switzerland, we included patients with RMS aged at least 18 years who (1) had initiated first-line, low-to-moderate-efficacy DMT (interferon β, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, or dimethyl fumarate) continued for ≥12 months, (2) were clinically stable (no relapses or disability progression) on DMT for 12 months, (3) had MRI at baseline and after 12 months on DMT, and (4) had available clinical follow-up for ≥2 years after the second MRI. The primary endpoint was occurrence of relapse during follow-up. The number of new T2 lesions (T2L) and DMT strategy (continuing low-/moderate-efficacy DMT vs escalating DMT) were used as covariates in regression analyses., Results: A total of 131 patients with RMS, median age of 36 (25th-75th percentiles: 29-43) years, 73% women, were included and observed over a median period of 6 (5-9) years after second MRI. Sixty-two (47%) patients had relapse. Patients who continued first-line DMT had a 3-fold increased risk of relapse given 2 new T2L (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2, lower limit [LL] of 95% CI: 1.5) and a 4-fold increased risk given ≥3 new T2L (HR 4.0, LL-CI: 2.1). Escalation of DMT lowered the risk of relapse in patients with 2 new T2L by approximately 80% (HR 0.2, upper limit [UL] of 95% CI: 1.3) and with ≥3 new T2L by 70% (HR 0.3, UL-CI: 0.8). In case of only 1 new T2L, the increased risk of relapse and the treatment effect did not reach statistical significance of 5%., Discussion: In our real-world cohort of patients clinically stable under low-to-moderate-efficacy DMT, escalation of DMT based on isolated MRI activity decreased risk of further relapse when at least 2 new T2L had occurred., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that clinically stable patients with MS on low-/moderate-efficacy DMT with ≥3 new T2L on MRI who escalate DMT have a reduced risk of relapse and Expanded Disability Status Scale progression.

Background: Employing a rebaselining concept may reduce noise in retinal layer thinning measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT)., Methods: From an ongoing prospective observational study, we included patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), who had OCT scans at disease-modifying treatment (DMT) start (baseline), 6-12 months after baseline (rebaseline), and ⩾12 months after rebaseline. Mean annualized percent loss (aL) rates (%/year) were calculated both from baseline and rebaseline for peripapillary-retinal-nerve-fiber-layer (aLpRNFL baseline /aLpRNFL rebaseline ) and macular-ganglion-cell-plus-inner-plexiform-layer (aLGCIPL baseline /aLGCIPL rebaseline ) by mixed-effects linear regression models., Results: We included 173 RMS patients (mean age 31.7 years (SD 8.8), 72.8% female, median disease duration 15 months (12-94) median baseline-to-last-follow-up-interval 37 months (18-71); 56.6% moderately effective DMT (M-DMT), 43.4% highly effective DMT (HE-DMT)). Both mean aLpRNFL baseline and aLGCIPL baseline significantly increased in association with relapse (0.51% and 0.26% per relapse, p < 0.001, respectively) and disability worsening (1.10% and 0.48%, p < 0.001, respectively) before baseline, but not with DMT class. Contrarily, neither aLpRNFL rebaseline nor aLGCIPL rebaseline was dependent on relapse or disability worsening before baseline, while HE-DMT significantly lowered aLpRNFL rebaseline (by 0.31%, p < 0.001) and aLGCIPL rebaseline (0.25%, p < 0.001) compared with M-DMT., Conclusions: Applying a rebaselining concept significantly improves differentiation of DMT effects on retinal layer thinning by avoiding carry-over confounding from previous disease activity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Gabriel Bsteh has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Lilly, MedWhizz, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva. He has received unrestricted research grants from Celgene/BMS and Novartis.Harald Hegen has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Horizon, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Siemens and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva. He is associate editor of Frontiers in Neurology.Nik Krajnc has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Alexion, BMS/Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi Genzyme and held a grant for a Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Training Fellowship Programme from the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS).Fabian Föttinger has nothing to disclose.Patrick Altmann has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting from Biogen. He received a research grant from Quanterix International and was awarded a combined sponsorship from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi Genzyme, Roche, and Teva for a clinical study.Michael Auer has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme and Horizon Therapeutics.Klaus Berek has participated in meetings sponsored by and received travel funding from Biogen, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.Barbara Kornek has received honoraria for speaking and for consulting from Biogen, BMS-Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Teva, and Sanofi Genzyme outside of the submitted work. No conflict of interest with respect to the present study.Fritz Leutmezer has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Actelion, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.Stefan Macher declares no conflict of interest relevant to this study.Tobias Monschein has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.Markus Ponleitner has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker or consulting honoraria or travel funding from Amicus, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi Genzyme.Paulus Rommer has received honoraria for consultancy/speaking from Alexion/Astra Zeneca, Allmiral, Amgen/Horizon, Amicus, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi has received research grants from Amicus, Biogen, Merck, and Roche.Christiane Schmied declares no conflict of interest relevant to this study.Karin Zebenholzer received speaking honoraria or travel grants from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme.Gudrun Zulehner has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.Tobias Zrzavy has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.Florian Deisenhammer has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi Genzyme. His institution received scientific grants from Biogen and Sanofi Genzyme.Franziska Di Pauli has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene BMS, Horizon, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva, and Roche. Her institution has received research grants from Roche.Berthold Pemp has received honoraria for consulting from Novartis, has received honoraria for advisory boards/consulting from Chiesi and GenSight, and has received speaker honoraria from Novartis, Chiesi, and Santen.Thomas Berger has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Bayer, Biogen, Bionorica, BMS/Celgene, Genesis, GSK, GW/Jazz Pharma, Horizon, Janssen-Cilag, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva, and UCB. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Biogen, Bayer, BMS/Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva) and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.

Background: Individual disease-modifying treatment (DMT) decisions might differ between female and male people with MS (pwMS)., Objective: To identify sex-related differences in DMT strategies over the past decades in a real-world setting., Methods: In this cohort study, data from the Austrian Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Registry (AMSTR), a nationwide prospectively collected registry mandatory for reimbursement, were retrospectively analyzed. Of 4840 pwMS, those with relapsing-remitting MS, aged at least 18 years, who started DMT and had at least two clinical visits, were identified. At baseline, demographics, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, annualized relapse rate (ARR) in the prior 12 months and MRI lesion load were assessed. At follow-up, ARR, EDSS scores, and DMT were determined., Results: A total of 4224 pwMS were included into the study and had a median of 10 (IQR 5-18) clinical visits over an observation period of 3.5 (IQR 1.5-6.1) years. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that the probability of DMT escalation due to relapse activity was lower in female than male pwMS (HR 4.1 vs. 8.3 per ARR). Probability of discontinuing moderate-effective DMT was higher in female pwMS when they were younger (HR 1.03 per year), and lower in male pwMS at higher age (HR 0.92). Similarly, female pwMS were more likely to stop highly effective DMT than male pwMS (HR 1.7). Among others, the most frequent reason for DMT discontinuation was family planning in female pwMS. All sex-related effects were independent of disease activity, such as MRI lesion load, baseline ARR or EDSS., Conclusions: Real-world treatment decisions are influenced by sex-related aspects. Awareness of these associations should prevent unwarranted differences in MS care., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background/objective: Observational real-world study to analyze the clinical effects of alemtuzumab (ALEM) and subsequent disease-modifying therapy (DMT) usage in multiple sclerosis (MS)., Methods: Data retrieved from the Austrian MS treatment registry (AMSTR) included baseline (BL) characteristics (at ALEM start), annualized relapse rate (ARR), 6-month confirmed progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA; ≥ 0.5-point Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score increase), 6-month confirmed disability improvement (CDI; ≥ 0.5-point EDSS decrease), and safety outcomes until initiation of a subsequent DMT. The EDSS was re-baselined at 30 days from ALEM start (BL EDSS)., Results: Eighty-seven ALEM-treated patients (median age: 32 years, 72% female, 14% treatment-naïve) were followed for a median of 55 (interquartile range 31-68) months. We found significant reductions in the ARR from 1.16 before ALEM to 0.15 throughout Years 1-9 (p < 0.001). Subsequent DMTs were initiated in 19 patients (22%, 74% anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies). At Year 5 (n = 53), more patients achieved CDI (58%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 45%-71%) than had experienced PIRA (14%, CI 7.5%-24%), and 58% remained relapse-free. Shorter MS duration (p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 0.86 (CI 0.80-0.93)) and no previous high-efficacy treatment (p < 0.001, HR 5.16 (CI 2.66-10.0)) were the best predictors of CDI, while PIRA was associated with a higher number of previous DMTs (p = 0.04, HR 3.06, CI 1.05-8.89). We found no new safety signals., Interpretation: ALEM had long-lasting beneficial effects on the ARR and disability improvement, especially when initiated early in the course of the disease. Only a subset of patients received subsequent DMTs., (© 2024 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of early intensive treatment (EIT) versus escalation treatment (ESC) in a nationwide observational cohort of almost 1000 people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS)., Materials and Methods: The EIT cohort started with alemtuzumab (AZM), cladribine (CLAD), fingolimod (FTY), natalizumab (NTZ), ocrelizumab (OCR), or ozanimod (OZA); whereas, the ESC cohort was escalated from dimethylfumarate (DMF) or teriflunomide (TERI) to AZM, CLAD, FTY, NTZ, OCR, or OZA within the Austrian MS Treatment Registry. Patients had to stay on therapy for at least 3 months and up to 16 years. The EIT cohort included 743 and the ESC cohort 227 RRMS patients. We used multinomial propensity scores for inverse probability weighting in generalized linear (GLM) and Cox proportional hazards models to correct for the bias of this non-randomized registry study., Results: Estimated mean annualized relapse rates (ARR) were 0.09 for EIT and 0.4 for ESC patients. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) in the GLM model for relapses showed a decreased relapse probability of 78% for the EIT versus ESC cohort [IRR = 0.22, 95% CI (0.16-0.30), p < 0.001]. Analyzing the time to the first relapse by Cox regression, a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.17 [95% CI (0.13-0.22), p < 0.001] revealed a decreased risk of 83% for the EIT group. Regarding sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression for 12 weeks, a HR of 0.55 [95% CI (0.40-0.76), p < 0.001] showed a decreased probability of 45% for the EIT cohort., Conclusions: ESC treatment after DMF and TERI revealed a higher relapse and EDSS progression probability compared to EIT in Austrian RRMS patients. Therefore, an early intensive treatment should be started in patients with an active or highly active disease course., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Olfactory threshold (OT) is a marker of short-term inflammatory activity in multiple sclerosis (MS)., Objective: To investigate whether OT predicts long-term MS clinical disease course., Methods: This was a 6-year prospective longitudinal study on MS patients at the MS clinic Innsbruck. Clinical visits assessing the occurrence of relapses, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, and disease-modifying treatment (DMT), were conducted biannually. OT testing was performed at baseline (BL), year 1 (Y1), year 2 (Y2) and year 6 (Y6), using the threshold subscore of the "Sniffin' Sticks" test. Cognitive function was assessed by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test., Results: Of 139 MS patients, 92 were eligible for Y6 follow-up. 68% experienced relapses, 53% EDSS worsening, 29% progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) and 41% cognitive deterioration. OT scores were lower at BL, Y1 and Y2 in patients requiring DMT escalation. In multivariable analysis, higher OT scores at BL, Y1, Y2 and Y6 were associated with lower risk of relapse (hazard ratio, HR: 0.65-0.92) and EDSS worsening (HR: 0.86-0.89), while no associations were found for PIRA and cognitive deterioration., Conclusions: OT is a potential surrogate marker for long-term inflammatory disease activity and DMT failure in MS., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Klaus Berek: has participated in meetings sponsored by and received travel funding or speaker honoraria from Roche, Teva, Merck, Biogen, Sanofi, Novartis. He is associate editor of Frontiers in Immunology / Section Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology. Harald Hegen: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Horizon, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Siemens, Teva, and received honoraria for acting as consultant for Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche and Teva. He is associate editor of Frontiers in Neurology. Michael Auer: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaking honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Horizon Therapeutics and Sanofi Genzyme. Robert Barket: has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel grants from, Novartis, Janssen-Cilag and Sanofi-Genzyme. Received honoraria from Janssen-Cilag and Biogen. Franziska Di Pauli: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, BMS, Horizon, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, and Roche. Jakob Hocher: has nothing to declare. Nik Krajnc: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Alexion, BMS/Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi-Genzyme and held a grant for a Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Training Fellowship Programme from the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS). Anne Zinganell: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaking honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis and Teva. Florian Deisenhammer: has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Horizon, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi. His institution received scientific grants from Biogen, Novartis, and Sanofi. Thomas Berger: has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Bayer, Biogen, Bionorica, BMS, Eisai, GW/Jazz, Horizon, Janssen-Cilag, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, UPC. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Biogen, Bayer, BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Teva and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva. Gabriel Bsteh: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. He has received unrestricted research grants from Celgene/BMS and Novartis., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Odour discrimination and identification (DI) are markers associated with disability worsening and neuroaxonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS)., Objective: The main objective of this research is to investigate whether longitudinal change of DI predicts long-term MS disease course., Methods: This is a 6-year prospective longitudinal study on MS patients at the MS Clinic Innsbruck. Clinical, bi-annual visits assessed patients' history and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. DI and cognitive function were assessed at baseline (BL), Year 1 (Y1), Year 2 (Y2) and Year 6 (Y6) by the 'Sniffin' Sticks'/Symbol Digit Modalities Test., Results: Around 92 of 139 patients were available for Y6 follow-up. Mean DI scores significantly decreased over time (BL = 27.8, Y1 = 27.5, Y2 = 26.3 and Y6 = 26.3; p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with patients' age ( r s = -0.120, p = 0.032) and disease duration ( r s = -0.103, p = 0.041). Multivariable regression analyses revealed that lower absolute DI scores and larger DI score loss over time were associated with higher probability of EDSS worsening (per -1 point: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.40 (1.16-1.68) and 2.34 (1.27-4.21)), progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) (HR = 1.49 (1.20-1.85) and 2.22 (1.33-3.31)) and cognitive deterioration (HR = 1.75 (1.35-2.27) and 4.29 (1.26-2.84)) at Y6, but not with time to first relapse., Conclusion: Odour DI is an irreversible marker of neuroaxonal damage, associated with PIRA, cognitive deterioration and EDSS worsening., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: K.B. has participated in meetings sponsored by and received travel funding or speaker honoraria from Roche, Teva, Merck, Biogen, Sanofi and Novartis. H.H. has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Siemens, Teva and received honoraria for acting as consultant for Biogen, Celgene, Novartis and Teva. He is associate editor of Frontiers in Neurology. M.A. received speaker honoraria and/or travel grants from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme and Horizon Therapeutics. R.B. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel grants from, Novartis, Janssen-Cilag and Sanofi-Genzyme. Received honoraria from Janssen-Cilag.F.D.P. has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, Celgene and Roche. N.K. has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from BMS/Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi-Genzyme and held a grant for a Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Training Fellowship Programme from the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS). A.Z. has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaking honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. F.D. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi-Genzyme. His institution received scientific grants from Biogen and Sanofi-Genzyme.T.B. has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Bayer, Biogen, Bionorica, Biologix, BMS/Celgene, Eisai, Janssen-Cilag, Jazz/GW, Horizon, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Teva. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Biogen, Bayer, BMS/Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, Teva and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva. G.B.: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. He has received unrestricted research grants from Celgene/BMS and Novartis.

Background/objective: The use of natalizumab (NAT) in multiple sclerosis (MS) may be complicated by progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare and life-threatening opportunistic brain infection. We aimed to analyze the course of MS after PML recovery together with the long-term outcome of NAT-associated PML (NAT-PML) in Austria., Methods: Retrospective study based on identification of cases in the nationwide Austrian MS treatment registry (AMSTR) and MS centers with review of patient records. The expanded disability status scale (EDSS) was used to measure neurological disability and outcome., Results: As of December 2022, we identified 15 NAT-PML cases in Austria; only 20% occurred after 2016, when increased vigilance commenced. Two patients did not survive acute PML, and an additional patient died five years later, yielding a mortality rate of 20%. Seizures occurred exclusively in patients with pronounced EDSS increase. Gadolinium (Gd)-enhancement on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on PML suspicion was associated with minor changes of post-PML neurological disability. Long-term follow-up of up to 132 months (median 76 months) was available in 11/15. The overall median EDSS increased from 3.5 at pre-PML to 6.5 at the last assessment. Regarding inflammatory MS-related disease activity during the observation period, one single individual experienced an MS relapse and another patient had two Gd-enhancing brain lesions. Three patients converted to progressive MS within three years from PML and the EDSS further increased in 6/11., Conclusions: The number of NAT-PML cases is decreasing over time. While many patients accumulated severe persistent neurological deficits compared to pre-PML, inflammatory MS-related disease activity after PML recovery was rare., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Lumbar puncture (LP) is recommended in patients with thunderclap headache and negative computed tomography to rule out spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Blood contamination of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) due to traumatic LP poses a diagnostic dilemma. Therefore, routine CSF parameters were investigated to distinguish between SAH and a traumatic LP. CSF red blood cell (RBC), white blood cell (WBC) count, total protein, CSF colour and supernatant were used for group comparisons of patients with SAH and 'symptomatic controls'. Due to variable time intervals between bleeding onset and LP in SAH patients in contrast to patients with traumatic LP, where blood contamination of CSF occurs at the time of LP, CSF variables were adjusted for decay in time to allow comparability. Logistic regression analysis identified bloody CSF [odds ratio (OR) 32.6], xanthochromic supernatant [OR 15.5] and WBC adjusted [OR 4.5 (per increase of 100/µl)] as predictors of SAH, while age, sex and CSF total protein adjusted were no predictors. Optimal cut-point of RBC adjusted (determined at day 1 after bleeding) was > 3667/µl to identify SAH patients with a 97% sensitivity and 94% specificity. Combination of low RBC and clear CSF supernatant was found in none of SAH patients. Combined CSF RBC count and CSF supernatant reliably distinguished traumatic LP from SAH., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background and Objectives: The optic nerve has been recommended as an additional region for demonstrating dissemination in space (DIS) in diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study was to investigate whether adding the optic nerve region as determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT) as part of the DIS criteria improves the 2017 diagnostic criteria., Methods: From a prospective observational study, we included patients with a first demyelinating event who had complete information to assess DIS and a spectral domain OCT scan obtained within 180 days. Modified DIS criteria (DIS + OCT) were constructed by adding the optic nerve to the current DIS regions based on validated thresholds for OCT intereye differences. Time to second clinical attack was the primary endpoint., Results: We analyzed 267 patients with MS (mean age 31.3 years [SD 8.1], 69% female) during a median observation period of 59 months (range: 13-98). Adding the optic nerve as a fifth region improved the diagnostic performance by increasing accuracy (DIS + OCT 81.2% vs DIS 65.6%) and sensitivity (DIS + OCT 84.2% vs DIS 77.9%) without lowering specificity (DIS + OCT 52.2% vs DIS 52.2%). Fulfilling DIS + OCT criteria (≥2 of 5 DIS + OCT regions involved) indicated a similar risk of a second clinical attack (hazard ratio [HR] 3.6, CI 1.4-14.5) compared with a 2.5-fold increased risk when fulfilling DIS criteria (HR 2.5, CI 1.2-11.8). When the analysis was conducted according to topography of the first demyelinating event, DIS + OCT criteria performed similarly in both optic neuritis and nonoptic neuritis., Discussion: Addition of the optic nerve, assessed by OCT, as a fifth region in the current DIS criteria improves diagnostic performance by increasing sensitivity without lowering specificity., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that adding the optic nerve as determined by OCT as a fifth DIS criterion to the 2017 McDonald criteria improves diagnostic accuracy., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Purpose: Red blood cell (RBC) degradation after subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) negatively affects functional outcome. Although the detection of RBCs in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a widely available part of neurological routine diagnostics, the prognostic value as a biomarker remains unclear. This study was undertaken to investigate whether CSF RBC count correlates with established radiological markers of SAH volume and whether the CSF RBC count can predict functional outcome in SAH patients., Methods: A total of 121 consecutive spontaneous SAH patients were retrospectively analyzed. CSF was collected from external ventricular drain as part of routine diagnostic procedures. We used multivariable binary logistic regression to investigate associations between CSF RBC counts and functional outcome 3 months after SAH or hospital survival. Good functional outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2., Results: Patients' age was 60 ± 14 years, and the median admission Hunt & Hess grade (H&H) was 4. CSF samples were collected 2 days after intensive care unit admission. High CSF RBC counts positively correlated with radiological measurements for SAH volume, for example, modified Fisher score (p = 0.002) and Hijdra ventricle score (p = 0.016). Multivariable regression analysis adjusted for age, H&H grade, modified Fisher and Hijdra scores showed that low CSF RBC counts predicted hospital survival (per 100,000 CSF RBCs: adjusted odds ratio [adjOR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.61-0.89, p = 0.001) and good functional outcome after 3 months (per 100,000 CSF RBC: adjOR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.60-0.96, p = 0.020)., Conclusions: CSF RBC counts correlate with radiographic scores quantifying SAH volume and may serve as an early independent biomarker for hospital survival and good functional 3-month outcome in patients requiring ventriculostomy after SAH., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Introduction: With the approval of natalizumab in Europe in 2006, the Austrian Multiple Sclerosis Therapy Registry (AMSTR) was established. Here, we present data from this registry about effectiveness and safety of natalizumab in patients treated up to 14 years., Patients/methods: Data retrieved from the AMSTR contained baseline characteristics and biannual documentation of annualised relapse rate (ARR) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score as well as adverse events and reasons for discontinuation on follow-up visits., Results: A total of 1596 natalizumab patients (71% women, n = 1133) were included in the analysis and the observed treatment duration ranged from 0 to 164 months (13.6 years). The mean ARR was 2.0 (SD = 1.13) at baseline, decreasing to 0.16 after 1 year and 0.01 after 10 years. A total of 325 patients (21.6%) converted to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) during the observational period. Of 1502 patients, 1297 (86.4%) reported no adverse events (AE) during follow-up visits. The most common reported AEs were infections and infusion-related reactions. John Cunningham virus (JCV) seropositivity was the most common specified reason for treatment discontinuation (53.7%, n = 607). There were five confirmed cases of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) with 1 death., Conclusion: The effectiveness of natalizumab in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) could be confirmed in our real-world cohort even after follow-up of up to 14 years, though after year 10, there were less than 100 remaining patients. A low number of AE were reported in this nationwide registry study, establishing Natalizumab's favourable safety profile during long-term use., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: The understanding of the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis (MS) has evolved alongside the characterization of cytokines and chemokines in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum. However, the complex interplay of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in different body fluids in people with MS (pwMS) and their association with disease progression is still not well understood and needs further investigation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to profile a total of 65 cytokines, chemokines, and related molecules in paired serum and CSF samples of pwMS at disease onset., Methods: Multiplex bead-based assays were performed and baseline routine laboratory diagnostics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and clinical characteristics were assessed. Of 44 participants included, 40 had a relapsing-remitting disease course and four a primary progressive MS., Results: There were 29 cytokines and chemokines that were significantly higher in CSF and 15 in serum. Statistically significant associations with moderate effect sizes were found for 34 of 65 analytes with sex, age, CSF, and MRI parameters and disease progression., Discussion: In conclusion, this study provides data on the distribution of 65 different cytokines, chemokines, and related molecules in CSF and serum in newly diagnosed pwMS., Competing Interests: KB has participated in meetings sponsored by, received travel funding from, or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Roche, Biogen, TEVA, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, and Novartis. AB was an employee of VASCage – Research Centre on Vascular Ageing and Stroke and has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, Almirall, and Biogen. DR was an employee of VASCage – Research Centre on Vascular Ageing and Stroke. MA received speaker honoraria and/or travel grants from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, and Sanofi. RB has participated in meetings sponsored by and received travel grants from Biogen, Novartis, and Sanofi. AZ has participated in meetings sponsored by and received speaking honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. SW has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria or travel funding from Allergan, Biogen, Ipsen Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva, and Bristol Myers Squibb. TB has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria lectures, advisory boards, and consultations from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Bayer, Biogen, Bionorica, BMS/Celgene, GSK, GW/Jazz Pharma, Horizon, Janssen-Cilag, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, and UCB. FP has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria lectures, advisory boards, consultations or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, Celgene, and Roche. Her institution has received research grants from Roche. FD has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Almirall, Alexion, Biogen, Celgene, Genzyme-Sanofi, Horizon, Janssen, Merck, Novartis Pharma, Roche, and TEVA ratiopharm. His institution has received research grants from Biogen and Genzyme Sanofi. He is a section editor of the MSARD Journal Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders and a review editor of Frontiers Neurology. HH has participated in meetings sponsored by and received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Siemens, and Teva, and received honoraria for acting as consultant for Biogen, Celgene, Novartis, and Teva. MR was supported by a research support from Euroimmun and Roche. The University Hospital and Medical University of Innsbruck Austria, employer of Dr. Reindl receives payments for antibody assays MOG, AQP4, and other autoantibodies and for MOG and AQP4 antibody validation experiments organized by Euroimmun Lübeck, Germany. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Berek, Bauer, Rudzki, Auer, Barket, Zinganell, Lerch, Hofer, Grams, Poskaite, Wurth, Berger, Di Pauli, Deisenhammer, Hegen and Reindl.)

Objectives: To compare in a nationwide observational cohort the effectiveness, frequency and reasons for treatment interruption of dimethylfumarate (DMF) and teriflunomide (TERI) (horizontal switchers) versus alemtuzumab (AZM), cladribine (CLAD), fingolimod (FTY), natalizumab (NTZ), ocrelizumab (OCR) and ozanimod (OZA) (vertical switchers) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (pwRRMS) and prior interferon beta (IFN-beta) or glatiramer-acetate (GLAT) treatment., Materials and Methods: The "horizontal switch cohort" included 669 and the "vertical switch cohort" 800 RRMS patients. We used propensity scores for inverse probability weighting in generalized linear (GLM) and Cox proportional hazards models to correct for bias in this non-randomized registry study., Results: Estimated mean annualized relapse rates (ARR) were 0.39 for horizontal and 0.17 for vertical switchers. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) in the GLM model showed an increased relapse probability of 86% for horizontal versus vertical switchers (IRR = 1.86; 95% CI 1.38-2.50; p < 0.001). Analyzing the time to the first relapse after treatment switch by Cox regression, a hazard ratio of 1.58 (95% CI 1.24-2.02; p < 0.001) indicated an increased risk of 58% for horizontal switchers. The hazard ratios for treatment interruption comparing horizontal versus vertical switchers were 1.78 (95% CI 1.46-2.18; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Horizontal switching after a platform therapy resulted in a higher relapse and interrupt probability and was associated with a trend towards less EDSS improvement comparing to vertical switching in Austrian RRMS patients., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Due to the demographic development and improved treatment options, the role of comorbidities is of increasing importance in the medical care of people with MS (pwMS). A higher risk of osteoporosis is well known in chronic autoimmune diseases, and is also described in MS. While there are several screening guidelines in the elderly or in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, there are no generally accepted recommendations when to perform bone mineral testing in pwMS under the age of 65 years. We aimed to determine risk factors of osteoporosis in pwMS and to develop a risk score which can be applied in daily clinical routine., Methods: Densitometry (hip and lumbar spine) was performed in 159 pwMS aged ≤65 years and in 81 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC). Osteoporosis was defined according to WHO criteria as a bone density 2.5 standard deviation or more below the mean of young adults. Risk factors were identified by logistic regression analysis., Results: Osteoporosis occurred more frequently in postmenopausal pwMS and male pwMS as compared to HC. Besides age, sex, menopausal status in females, body-mass-index and smoking, a higher degree of disability - as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale - was identified as MS specific risk factor for osteoporosis, whereas the cumulative glucocorticoid dose was not associated with osteoporosis risk. Based on these risk factors, we developed an MS-specific risk score which allows to estimate the individual probability of osteoporosis., Conclusion: This risk score enables individual screening recommendation for pwMS and, subsequently, early prevention of osteoporosis which probably should result in reduction of fractures and morbidity., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Inter-individual courses of multiple sclerosis (MS) are extremely variable. The objective of this study was to investigate whether κ-free light chain (κ-FLC) index and serum neurofilament light (sNfL) have an additive predictive value for MS disease activity., Methods: Patients with early MS who had cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum sampling at disease onset were followed for four years. At baseline, age, sex, disease duration, number of T2-hyperintense (T2L), and contrast-enhancing T1 lesions (CEL) on MRI were determined. During follow-up, the occurrence of a second clinical attack and start of disease-modifying treatment (DMT) were registered. κ-FLC was measured by nephelometry, and κ-FLC index calculated as [CSF κ-FLC/serum κ-FLC]/albumin quotient. sNfL was determined by single-molecule array, and age- and body-mass-index adjusted Z scores were calculated., Findings: A total of 86 patients at a mean age of 33 ± 10 years and with a female predominance of 67% were included; 36 (42%) patients experienced a second clinical attack during follow-up. Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, T2L, CEL, disease and follow-up duration, and DMT use during follow-up revealed that both κ-FLC index as well as sNfL Z score independently predict time to second clinical attack. The chance for freedom of relapse within 12 months was 2% in patients with high levels of κ-FLC index (>100) and high sNfL Z score (>3), 30% in patients with high κ-FLC index (>100) and lower sNfL Z score (≤3), 70% in patients with lower κ-FLC index (≤100) but high sNfL Z score (>3), and 90% in patients with lower levels of κ-FLC index (≤100) and sNfL Z score (≤3)., Interpretation: κ-FLC index and sNfL Z score have an additive predictive value for early MS disease activity that is independent of known predictors., Funding: This study was funded by a grant of the charitable foundation of the Austrian Multiple Sclerosis Society., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests HH has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Siemens, Teva, and received honoraria for acting as consultant for Biogen, Celgene, Novartis and Teva. He is associate editor of Frontiers in Neurology. KB has participated in meetings sponsored by and received travel funding or speaker honoraria from Roche, Teva, Merck, Biogen, Sanofi. GB has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Teva. MA received speaker honoraria and/or travel grants from Biogen, Novartis, Merck and Sanofi. PA has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting from Biogen. He received a research grant from Quanterix International and was awarded a combined sponsorship from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, and Teva for a clinical study. FDP has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche and Teva. AG has nothing to disclose. DM has participated in meetings sponsored by Siemens. MP has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker or consulting honoraria or travel funding from Amicus, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme. PP has nothing to disclose. CS has participated in meetings sponsored by Siemens. SW has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria or travel funding from Allergan, Biogen, Ipsen Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva and Bristol Myers Squibb. AZ has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaking honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. TB has participated in the last 2 years in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for multiple sclerosis: Almirall, Biogen, Bionorica, BMS/Celgene, Eisai, Horizon, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Janssen-Cilag, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Aventis/Genzyme, Sandoz, TG Therapeutics, TEVA and UCB. His institution has received financial support in the last 2 years by unrestricted research grants (Biogen, BMS/Celgene, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis/Genzyme, Roche, TEVA) and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, BMS/Celegen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Aventis/Genzyme, TEVA. JW has nothing to disclose. FD has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene-BMS, Genzyme-Sanofi, Horizon, Merck, Novartis Pharma, Roche, and Teva. His institution has received research grants from Biogen and Genzyme Sanofi. He is section editor of the MSARD Journal (Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders) and review editor of Frontiers Neurology., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) under certain disease-modifying therapies (DMT) show a higher risk of infection and a lower immune response to vaccination. Hence, assessing immunization status prior to DMT start and, where necessary, performing vaccinations is  recommended. We aimed to determine the immunization status in MS patients and to identify factors associated with low vaccination rates., Methods: Patients with MS who were seen at the MS clinic of the Medical University of Innsbruck throughout a period of 14 months in 2020 and 2021 were eligible for inclusion into this prospective, single-center study. Immunization status against 17 different pathogens was obtained from vaccination certificate and by patient questionnaire. Antibody detection against seven antigens was performed in peripheral blood., Results: Of 424 patients with MS at a mean age of 43 ± 12 years, the vast majority had vaccinations against tetanus (94%), diphtheria (92%), and poliomyelitis (90%), whereas a lower proportion had vaccinations against tick-borne encephalitis (70%), pertussis (69%), hepatitis B (65%), rubella (55%), hepatitis A (50%), measles (49%), mumps (47%), and only a minority against influenza (10%), pneumococcal (6%) and meningococcal disease (4%), human papillomavirus (4%), yellow fever (2%), and varicella zoster virus (1%). A total of 87% received vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Overall, higher vaccination rates were associated with younger age, relapsing disease course, and education level. Misinformation on infectious diseases and vaccines was associated with lower vaccination rates., Conclusions: The majority of MS patients did not fulfil vaccination recommendations. Efforts to increase vaccination rates, preferentially before DMT start, should be promoted., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Purpose: This study was undertaken to investigate baseline peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness for prediction of disability accumulation in early relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS)., Methods: From a prospective observational study, we included patients with newly diagnosed RMS and obtained spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scan within 90 days after RMS diagnosis. Impact of pRNFL and GCIPL thickness for prediction of disability accumulation (confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score ≥ 3.0) was tested by multivariate (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]) Cox regression models., Results: We analyzed 231 MS patients (mean age = 30.3 years, SD = 8.1, 74% female) during a median observation period of 61 months (range = 12-93). Mean pRNFL thickness was 92.6 μm (SD = 12.1), and mean GCIPL thickness was 81.4 μm (SD = 11.8). EDSS ≥ 3 was reached by 28 patients (12.1%) after a median 49 months (range = 9-92). EDSS ≥ 3 was predicted with GCIPL < 77 μm (HR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.6-4.2, p < 0.001) and pRNFL thickness ≤ 88 μm (HR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.4-3.3, p < 0.001). Higher age (HR = 1.4 per 10 years, p < 0.001), incomplete remission of first clinical attack (HR = 2.2, p < 0.001), ≥10 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions (HR = 2.0, p < 0.001), and infratentorial MRI lesions (HR = 1.9, p < 0.001) were associated with increased risk of disability accumulation, whereas highly effective disease-modifying treatment was protective (HR = 0.6, p < 0.001). Type of first clinical attack and presence of oligoclonal bands were not significantly associated., Conclusions: Retinal layer thickness (GCIPL more than pRNFL) is a useful predictor of future disability accumulation in RMS, independently adding to established markers., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Purpose: Sexual dysfunction (SD) in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) is common and an often underestimated issue in the care of pwMS. The objective of the study was to evaluate risk factors for SD in pwMS, correlate its prevalence with patient-reported measures (quality of life and physical activity) and analyse its association with hormonal status., Methods: Sexual dysfunction was determined in 152 pwMS using the Multiple Sclerosis Intimacy and Sexuality Questionnaire 19. A logistical regression model was used to identify independent risk factors for SD., Results: The prevalence of SD in pwMS was 47%. Independent risk factors for the development of SD were ever-smoking (odds ratio [OR] 3.4, p = 0.023), disability as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (OR 2.0, p < 0.001), depression (OR 4.3, p = 0.047) and bladder and bowel dysfunction (OR 8.8, p < 0.001); the use of disease-modifying treatment was associated with a lower risk for SD (OR 0.32, p = 0.043). SD was associated with worse quality of life (Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale 29: physical score 6.3 vs. 40.0; psychological score 8.3 vs. 33.3; both p < 0.001) and lower physical activity (Baecke questionnaire, p < 0.001). Laboratory analysis revealed significantly higher luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels and lower 17-beta oestradiol, androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, oestrone and anti-Mullerian hormone levels in female pwMS with SD. In male pwMS and SD, there was a significant decrease in inhibin B levels., Conclusions: Our findings highlight the requirement of a holistic approach to SD in MS including physical, neurourological and psychosocial factors. Active screening for SD, especially in patients with disability, depression or bladder and bowel dysfunction, is recommended., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Anti-CD20 therapies decrease the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 immunization. We aimed to determine the extent of the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 antigens in correlation with peripheral B-cell dynamics among patients with central nervous system inflammatory disorders treated with anti-CD20 medications. We retrospectively included patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy after antigen contact who were divided into responders (>7 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL) and non-responders (<7 BAU/mL). In participants with first antigen contact prior to therapy, we investigated the recall response elicited once under treatment. We included 80 patients (responders n = 34, non-responders n = 37, recall cohort n = 9). The B-cell counts among responders were significantly higher compared to non-responders (mean 1012 cells/µL ± SD 105 vs. mean 17 cells/µL ± SD 47; p < 0.001). Despite very low B-cell counts (mean 9 cells/µL ± SD 20), humoral response was preserved among the recall cohort (mean 1653 BAU/mL ± SD 2250.1) and did not differ significantly from responders (mean 735 BAU/mL ± SD 1529.9; p = 0.14). Our data suggest that peripheral B cells are required to generate antibodies to neo-antigens but not for a recall response during anti-CD20 therapy. Evaluation of B-cell counts and pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 antibodies might serve as biomarkers for estimating the immune competence to mount a humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 antigens.

Background: Natalizumab is an approved treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis; however, its safety during pregnancy is not formally proven., Case Presentation: We report a woman with multiple sclerosis being treated with natalizumab before pregnancy. After withdrawal of natalizumab, she suffered a severe, disabling rebound. In agreement with the patient, natalizumab was restarted during pregnancy. Our patient improved substantially and gave birth to a healthy boy., Conclusion: Use of natalizumab during pregnancy may be an option in highly active multiple sclerosis., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Natalizumab (NTZ) is an established treatment for highly active, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. In the context of rare progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and extended interval dosing as a treatment option, biomarkers for treatment monitoring are required. Natalizumab serum concentration (NTZ SC) and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (sVCAM-1) concentration were shown to change on treatment with NTZ. We aimed to investigate whether NTZ SC and sVCAM-1 could be suitable pharmacodynamic markers and whether they could predict disease activity on NTZ, improving the concept of personalized multiple sclerosis treatment., Methods: In a retrospective study at the Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria, we identified patients treated with NTZ and chose samples longitudinally collected during routine follow-ups for the measurement of NTZ SC and sVCAM-1 by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We correlated these with clinical and demographic variables and clinical outcomes. Furthermore, we analyzed the stability of NTZ SC and sVCAM-1 during treatment., Results: One hundred and thirty-seven patients were included. We found a strong negative correlation between NTZ SC and sVCAM-1. Both showed significant associations with body mass index, infusion interval, sample age, and anti-drug-antibodies. Natalizumab serum concentration was reduced in extended interval dosing, but not sVCAM-1. Only sVCAM-1 showed a weak association with relapses during treatment, while there was no association with disease progression. Both NTZ SC and sVCAM-1 showed a wide inter-individual distribution while levels in single patients were stable on treatment., Conclusions: Soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 is a suitable pharmacodynamic marker during treatment with NTZ, which is significantly reduced already after the first dose, remains stable in individual patients even on extended interval dosing, and strongly correlates with NTZ SC. Because of the high inter-individual range, absolute levels of sVCAM-1 and NTZ SC are difficult to introduce as treatment monitoring biomarkers in order to predict disease activity in single patients., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: Peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer and macular ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer thinning are markers of neuroaxonal degeneration in multiple sclerosis., Objective: We aimed to investigate the value of peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer and ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer thinning for prediction of long-term disability., Methods: This is a 6-year prospective longitudinal study on 93 multiple sclerosis patients. Optical coherence tomography scans were performed at baseline, after 1, 2 and 6 years. Primary endpoint was disability progression after 6 years, defined as expanded disability status scale worsening and/or cognitive deterioration. Univariate and multivariate analysis was used to investigate the value of peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer and ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer to predict the primary endpoint., Results: A total of 57 (61.3%) patients had disability worsening, 40 (43.0%) expanded disability status scale worsening and 34 (36.6%) cognitive deterioration. Mean peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer and ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer baseline thickness were 93.0 and 75.2 µm, and mean annualised peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer and ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer thinning rates over 6 years were 1.3 and 1.6 µm, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed lower peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer and ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer baseline thickness and higher annualised thinning rates in patients with disability progression after 6 years. Effects were more pronounced for ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer and expanded disability status scale worsening than for peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer models and cognitive deterioration., Conclusion: Ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer and peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer measurements depict neurodegeneration and predict disability progression in multiple sclerosis.

Background: Olfactory threshold (OT) is associated with short-term inflammatory activity in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS)., Objective: We aimed to investigate OT for prediction of treatment response in RMS., Methods: In this 5-year prospective study on 123 RMS patients, OT was measured at disease-modifying treatment (DMT) initiation (M0), after 3 months (M3), and 12 months (M12) by Sniffin' Sticks test. Primary endpoint was defined as an absence of relapse during the observation period, with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity being the secondary endpoints. Optimal cutoff values were determined by receiver operating characteristic analyses and their predictive value assessed by multivariable Cox regression models., Results: Higher OT scores at M0, M3, and M12 were independently associated with decreased relapse probability with the strongest risk reduction at M3 (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.44, p  < 0.001). Improvement of OT scores from M0 to M3 (ΔOT M3 ) was also associated with reduced relapse risk (HR = 0.12, p  < 0.001). OT score > 6.5 at M3 was the strongest predictor of relapse freedom (HR = 0.10, p  < 0.001) with high diagnostic accuracy (positive predictive value (PPV) = 87%), closely followed by ΔOT M3  ⩾ 0.5 (HR = 0.12, p  < 0.001, PPV = 86%)., Conclusions: OT is an independent predictor of freedom of disease activity upon DMT initiation within 5 years and may be a useful biomarker of treatment response.

Background: Third vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is recommended for patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), usually six months after the last vaccination., Methods: In this prospective multicenter study on 292 pwMS and 46 healthy controls (HC), who had all received two vaccinations prior to study enrollment, SARS-CoV-2 IgG response was measured in the month before and 2-4 months after third vaccination. PwMS were categorized as follows: untreated (N-DMT, n = 32), receiving disease-modifying therapy (DMT) with expected humoral response (er-DMT: interferon-beta preparations, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, natalizumab, cladribine, alemtuzumab; n = 120) or no expected humoral response (nr-DMT: S1PMs, CD20mAb; n = 140)., Results: PwMS on nr-DMT had significantly lower median antibody levels before (12.1 U/ml [0.4-2500]) and after third vaccination (305 U/ml [0.4-2500]) in comparison to other groups (p<0.001). We did not find differences in antibody levels after homologous (n = 281; 2500 [0.4-2500]) and heterologous (n = 57; 2500 [0.4-2500]) vaccination regime regardless of the DMT group. The DMT group (β= -0.60; 95% CI -1195.73, -799.10; p<0.001) was associated with antibody levels after third vaccination, while time to revaccination (6 months [1-13]) was not. After third vaccination, seropositivity was reached in 75.8% and 82.2% of pwMS on anti-CD20 mAbs and S1PMs, respectively. Complete B-cell depletion significantly decreased the probability of seroconversion even after the third vaccination (OR 0.14; p = 0.021), whereas time interval to last DMT intake and time to revaccination did not. Twenty-two patients reported a SARS-CoV-2 infection (3 N-DMT, 9 er-DMT, 10 nr-DMT), one being asymptomatic and the rest having a mild course., Conclusion: Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 third vaccination in pwMS is excellent. While reduced by S1PMs and CD20mAb, protective response is still expected in the majority of patients., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background and Purpose: The aim was to determine the extent of sudomotor dysfunction in people with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (pwNMOSD) and to compare findings with a historical cohort of people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (pwRRMS)., Methods: Forty-eight pwNMOSD were enrolled from four clinical centers. All participants completed the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 to screen for symptoms of sudomotor dysfunction. Sudomotor function was assessed using the quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test. The results were compared with a historical cohort of 35 pwRRMS matched for age, sex and disease duration., Results: Symptoms of sudomotor dysfunction, defined by a score in the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 secretomotor domain &gt;0, were present in 26 (54%) of pwNMOSD. The quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test confirmed a sudomotor dysfunction in 25 (52.1%) of pwNMOSD; in 14 of them (29.2%) sudomotor dysfunction was moderate or severe. No difference was observed between pwNMOSD and pwRRMS in any of the studied parameters. However, symptomatic sudomotor dysfunction was more frequent in pwNMOSD (n = 8, 22.9%) compared to pwRRMS (n = 1, 3%; p = 0.028). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, statistically significant predictors for symptomatic sudomotor failure were age and diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder., Conclusions: Sudomotor dysfunction is common in pwNMOSD and more often symptomatic compared to pwRRMS., (© 2022 European Academy of Neurology.)

Over the recent years, the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) has evolved very rapidly and a large number of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) are now available. However, most DMTs are associated with adverse events, the most frequent of which being infections. Consideration of all DMT-associated risks facilitates development of risk mitigation strategies. An international focused workshop with expert-led discussions was sponsored by the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) and was held in April 2021 to review our current knowledge about the risk of infections associated with the use of DMTs for people with MS and NMOSD and corresponding risk mitigation strategies. The workshop addressed DMT-associated infections in specific populations, such as children and pregnant women with MS, or people with MS who have other comorbidities or live in regions with an exceptionally high infection burden. Finally, we reviewed the topic of DMT-associated infectious risks in the context of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Herein, we summarize available evidence and identify gaps in knowledge which justify further research.

Background: Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a severe neurological disease that frequently requires placement of external ventricular drainage (EVD). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) obtained via the drain is used to detect potential complications of SAH., Objective: This study aimed to describe the longitudinal profile of routine CSF parameters in patients with SAH and to identify associations with neurological complications., Methods: A total of thirty-three patients with spontaneous SAH who required an EVD and had at least three consecutive CSF samples collected over a period of more than 7 days were included in this study., Results: A median of 6 longitudinally collected CSF samples per patient were available within 1-22 days after SAH onset. Overall, red blood cells (RBC) steadily decreased over time, whereas white blood cells (WBC) and total protein (TP) increased until days 6 and 13, respectively, and decreased thereafter. The estimated decay rates of RBC, WBC, and TP were 28, 22, and 6% per day. Distinct CSF patterns over time were linked to known complications after SAH. Patients with rebleeding showed increased RBC, TP, and phagocytosing cells compared to patients without re-bleeding. For ventriculitis, an elevated cell index with a higher proportion of granulocytes was characteristic. CSF of patients with delayed cerebral ischemia showed increased RBC and WBC compared to patients without DCI. Early CSF WBC and cell index were predictive for the occurrence of DCI and ventriculitis later during the disease course. The amount of daily CSF drainage via EVD had no impact on routine CSF parameters., Conclusion: Longitudinal CSF characteristics are associated with SAH-related complications., Competing Interests: Author AZ has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaking honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. GB has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene-BMS, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene-BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. FDP has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene-BMS, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Sandoz, Roche, and Teva. Her institution has received research grants from Roche. FD has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene, Genzyme-Sanofi, Merck, Novartis Pharma, Roche, and Teva. His institution has received research grants from Biogen and Genzyme Sanofi. He is section editor of the MSARD Journal (Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders). HH has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Siemens, Teva, and received honoraria for acting as consultant for Biogen, Celgene, Novartis and Teva. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Zinganell, Bsteh, Di Pauli, Rass, Helbok, Walde, Deisenhammer and Hegen.)

Background: COVID-19 continues to challenge neurologists in counselling persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) regarding disease-modifying treatment (DMT) and vaccination. The objective here was to characterize predictors of COVID-19 outcome in pwMS., Methods: We included pwMS with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis from a nationwide population-based registry. COVID-19 outcome was classified as either mild or severe. Impact of DMT, specifically anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, and vaccination on COVID-19 outcome was determined by multivariable models adjusted for a-priori-risk (determined by a cumulative risk score comprising age, disability and comorbidities)., Results: Of 317 pwMS with COVID-19 (mean age 41.8 years [SD 12.4], 72.9% female, median EDSS 1.5 [range 0-8.5], 77% on DMT [16% on antiCD20]), 92.7% had a mild course and 7.3% a severe course with 2.2% dying from COVID-19. Ninety-seven pwMS (30.6%) were fully vaccinated. After a median 5 months from vaccination to SARS-CoV-2 infection (range 1-9), severe COVID-19 occurred in 2.1% of fully vaccinated pwMS compared to 9.5% in unvaccinated pwMS (p=0.018). A-priori-risk robustly predicted COVID-19 severity (R 2 0.605; p<0.001). Adjusting for a-priori-risk, anti-CD20 treatment was associated with increased COVID-19 severity (odds ratio [OR] 3.3; R 2 0.113; p=0.003), but exposure to any other DMT was not. Fully vaccinated pwMS showed a significantly decreased risk for severe COVID-19 (OR 0.21, R 2 0.144, p<0.001)., Conclusions: In a population-based MS cohort, COVID-19 course is primarily predicted by a-priori-risk (depending on age, disability and comorbidities) explaining about 60% of variance. Anti-CD20 treatment is associated with a moderately increased risk, while reassuringly vaccination provides protection from severe COVID-19., (This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.)

Background Alemtuzumab (ATZ), a highly effective disease modifying treatment for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), is associated with the rare risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. Increase of blood pressure (BP) was hypothesized to be causative, but prior administration of high-dose methylprednisolone (HDMP) is a potential confounder. Objective To analyze BP change in MS patients treated with ATZ and prior HDMP treatment compared to patients receiving HDMP only for acute relapse. Methods In this retrospective study, 30 patients treated with ATZ/HDMP and 60 age-, sex- and disability-matched controls treated with HDMP were included. Primary endpoint was the change of systolic BP (SBP) between before ATZ cycle and the maximum value measured during the treatment cycle; secondary endpoints were change in diastolic BP (DBP) and heart rate (HR). Results Change of SBP observed in ATZ/HDMP treated patients was significantly higher than in HDMP controls (mean maximal change of 12.8 vs. 8.1 mmHg, p = 0.033). An increase of SBP exceeding 20% from baseline was observed in 5 (16.7%) patients on ATZ/HDMP compared to 3 (5.0%) on HDMP (p = 0.078). The day after the 1st ATZ infusion, mean HR was higher in the ATZ/HDMP group compared to HDMP controls (82.5 vs. 73.2 bpm, p = 0.005), although there was no significant group difference over time. Conclusions ATZ treatment induced a slight, but significant increase in SBP independent of HDMP. Although hemodynamic alterations alone seem unlikely as putative mechanism for cerebral bleedings, strict cardiovascular monitoring is recommended to reduce rare, but severe cardiovascular side effects., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Long-term outcome after COVID-19 in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) is scarcely studied and controlled data are lacking., Objective: To compare long-term outcome after COVID-19 in pwMS to a matched control group of pwMS without COVID-19., Methods: We included pwMS with PCR-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and ≥6 months of follow-up available and, as a control group, pwMS matched 1:1 for age, sex, disability level and disease-modifying treatment type., Results: Of 211 pwMS with COVID-19 (mean age 42.6 years [SD 12.2], 69% female, median EDSS 1.5 [range: 0-7.5], 16% antiCD20), 90.5% initially had a mild COVID-19 course. At follow-up, 70% had recovered completely 3 months (M3) after COVID-19, 83% after 6 months (M6) and 94% after 12 months (M12). Mild initial COVID-19 course was the only significant predictor of complete recovery (odds ratio [OR]: 10.5; p<0.001). Most frequent residual symptoms were fatigue (M3: 18.5%, M6: 13.7%, M12: 7.3%), hyposmia (M3: 13.7%, M6: 5.2%, M12: 1.7%) and dyspnea (M3: 7.1%, M6: 6.6%, M12: 2.8%). Compared to matched controls, fatigue, hyposmia and dyspnea were significantly more frequent at M3 and still slightly at M6, while there was no difference at M12. PwMS with COVID-19 had neither a significantly increased risk for relapses (OR 1.1; p=0.70) nor disability worsening (OR 0.96; p=0.60)., Discussion: Long-term outcome of COVID-19 is favourable in a large majority of pwMS with only a small proportion of patients suffering from persistent symptoms usually resolving after 3-6 months. COVID-19 is not associated with increased risk of relapse or disability., (This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: SARS-CoV2 vaccination is recommended for patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), but response may be limited by disease-modifying-treatments (DMTs). The aim of this study was to compare the rates of humoral immune response and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pwMS and healthy controls (HCs)., Methods: In this multicenter prospective study on 456 pwMS and 116 HCs, SARS-CoV-2-IgG response was measured 3 months after the first vaccine dose. The primary endpoint was defined as proportion of patients developing antibodies (seroconversion). Secondary endpoints included antibody level, safety and efficacy., Results: Compared to 97.4% in HCs, seroconversion occurred in 96.7% (88/91) untreated pwMS, 97.1% of patients (135/139) on immunomodulatory DMTs and 61.1% (138/226; p < 0.001) on immunosuppressive DMTs. Seroconversion was lowest in patients on antiCD20 monoclonal antibodies (CD20 mAbs; 52.6%) followed by sphingosine-1-phosphate-receptor-modulators (S1PMs; 63.6%). In the S1PM subgroup, seroconversion increased with lymphocyte count (odds ratio [OR] 1.31 per 0.1 G/L; p = 0.035). In pwMS on CD20 mAbs, B-cell depletion decreased seroconversion (OR 0.52; p = 0.038), whereas time since last DMT did not. Safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pwMS was excellent., Conclusions: Humoral response to SARS-CoV2 vaccines in pwMS is generally excellent. While reduced by immunosuppressive DMTs, most importantly by B-cell-depleting CD20 mAbs and S1PMs, seroconversion is still expected in the majority of patients. SARS-CoV2 vaccination should be offered to every MS patient., (© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Evidence guiding personalized decision-making with respect to disease-modifying therapy (DMT) around pregnancy in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) is lacking., Objective: To generate and validate a risk score for disease reactivation intrapartum and postpartum in RMS., Methods: From the Vienna Innsbruck MS database (VIMSD), we included 343 pregnancies in patients with RMS. Primary endpoint was disease reactivation. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 in a generation and validation dataset. A predictive score was calculated using the Cox regression and validated., Results: In the generation dataset, occurrence of relapse and type of DMT in the year before conception, DMT washout duration, the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at conception, and time until DMT restart postpartum were identified as independent predictors of disease reactivation ( p < 0.001). The resulting 10-point risk score robustly predicted reactivation (explaining 75% of variance, p < 0.001) identifying patients at high [≥6 points; mean risk 65%; range 50-100%; hazard ratio (HR) 14.5], intermediate (3-5 points; mean risk 24%; range 15-35%; HR 4.3), and low risk (≤2 points; mean risk 6%; range 0-8%) of disease reactivation in pregnancy and up to 6 months postpartum., Conclusion: The composite Vienna Innsbruck Pregnancy Risk in Multiple Sclerosis (VIPRiMS) score is a valuable clinical tool to support patients and neurologists in anticipating risk and, thus, individualizing treatment decision-making around pregnancy., Competing Interests: GB has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria, or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene, Roche, and Teva. HH has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria, or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Siemens, and Teva and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene, Novartis, and Teva. PA has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria, or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva and received honoraria for consulting from Biogen. He received a research grant from Quanterix International and was awarded a combined sponsorship from Biogen, Merck, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva for a clinical study. FDP has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, and consultations), or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva. RE has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria, or travel funding from Almirall, Biogen, Böhringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, Novartis, Ottobock, and Teva. GZ has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva. PR has received honoraria for consultancy/speaking from AbbVie, Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, and Sanofi Genzyme and has received research grants from Amicus, Biogen, Merck, and Roche. FL has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Actelion, Alexion, Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Medday, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and Teva. FD has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi Genzyme. His institution received scientific grants from Biogen and Sanofi Genzyme. TB has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, and consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Biologix, Bionorica, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Janssen-Cilag, Medday, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva, and TG Pharmaceuticals. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva and for participation in clinical trials in MS sponsored by Alexion, Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Bsteh, Hegen, Riedl, Altmann, Di Pauli, Ehling, Zulehner, Rommer, Leutmezer, Deisenhammer and Berger.)

Natalizumab (NTZ) has been used for treatment of highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). When stopping NTZ the risk of severe rebound phenomenon has to be considered. We aimed to investigate the use of NTZ in clinical routine and focused on identification of potential risk factors for disease reactivation after treatment discontinuation. At the Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria, we identified all MS patients who were treated with NTZ and performed a retrospective analysis on therapeutic decision making, disease course before, during and after treatment with NTZ and on risk factors for disease reactivation after NTZ discontinuation. 235 NTZ treated MS patients were included, of whom 105 had discontinued treatment. At NTZ start disease duration was 5.09 (IQR 2.09-10.57) years, average number of total relapses was 4 (IQR 3-6) and median EDSS 2.0 (range 0-6.5), whereby these values significantly decreased over time. Reduction of annualized relapse rate (ARR) on treatment was 93% and EDSS remained stable in 64%. In multivariate regression models only conversion to secondary progressive MS (SPMS) on treatment was significantly associated with lower risk of disease reactivation after NTZ, while ARR before treatment was associated with earlier disease reactivation. We could confirm the high therapeutic efficacy of NTZ which trends to be used earlier in the disease course nowadays. Discontinuation of NTZ seems safe only in patients who convert to SPMS during treatment, while higher ARR before NTZ increases the risk of disease reactivation after treatment discontinuation., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To evaluate long-term effectiveness of natalizumab (NTZ) and to determine demographic, clinical, and radiological predictors regarding long-term disease activity (≥ 7 years) in a nationwide observational cohort, using data collected prospectively in a real-life setting., Materials and Methods: We analysed data from 230 patients from the Austrian Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Registry (AMSTR), who had started treatment with NTZ at any time since 2006 and stayed on NTZ for at least 7 years without treatment gap of more than three months., Results: Estimated mean annualised relapse rates (ARR) over a mean treatment period of 9.3 years were 0.07 for NTZ. Sustained EDSS progression for 12 weeks was observed in 36 (19%) patients and for 24 weeks in 31 (16.3%) cases. Sustained EDSS regression for 12 and 24 weeks was seen in 45 (23.7%) and 42 (22.1%) cases. The baseline parameters ≥ 1 Gadolinium-enhancing MRI lesion(s) [incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.409 (95% CI 0.283-0.593), p = 0.001], ARR ≤ 1 in the prior 12 month before treatment initiation with NTZ [IRR of 0.353 (95% CI 0.200-0.623), p = 0.001] and EDSS ≤ 1 [incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.081 (95% CI 0.011-0.581), p = 0.012] were significantly associated with a reduced relapse risk, whereas a disease duration ≤ 5 years increased significantly the ARR [IRR of 1.851 (95% CI 1.249-2.743), p = 0.002]. The only predictive baseline parameter for experiencing EDSS progression (sustained for 12 and 24 weeks) was age > 35 years [HR of 2.482 (95% CI 1.110-5.549), p = 0.027, and HR of 2.492 (95% CI 1.039-5.978), p = 0.041, respectively]., Conclusions: These real-life data show a stable disease course regarding relapse activity and disease progression under NTZ treatment for more than 7 years. The main predictors for disease activity were higher relapse rate before treatment initiation, higher disability, shorter disease duration and absence of Gadolinium-enhancing MRI lesions at baseline. Older age at NTZ start was the only significant risk factor for disease progression over long-term., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

To determine whether there is a correlation between myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated diseases and varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection. We provide a case report and performed a study to determine the frequency of MOG antibodies (MOG-IgG) in neurological VZV infections. Patients admitted to the Medical University of Innsbruck from 2008-2020 with a diagnosis of a neurological manifestation of VZV infection (n=59) were included in this study; patients with neuroborreliosis (n=34) served as control group. MOG-IgG was detected using live cell-based assays. In addition, we performed a literature review focusing on MOG and aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibodies and their association with VZV infection. Our case presented with VZV-associated longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis and had MOG-IgG at a titer of 1:1280. In the study, we did not detect MOG-IgG in any other patient neither in the VZV group (including 15 with VZV encephalitis/myelitis) nor in the neuroborreliosis group. In the review of the literature, 3 cases with MOG-IgG and additional 9 cases with AQP4 IgG associated disorders in association with a VZV infection were identified. MOG-IgG are rarely detected in patients with VZV infections associated with neurological diseases., Competing Interests: FDP has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche and Teva. Her institution has received research grants from Roche. KB has participated in meetings sponsored by and received travel funding from Roche. MA received speaker honoraria and/or travel grants from Biogen, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi. AB has participated in meetings sponsored by Merck and Biogen. TB has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for multiple sclerosis: Almirall, Biogen, Biologix, Bionorica, Celgene/BMS, GSK, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi/Genzyme, TG Pharmaceuticals, TEVA-ratiopharm and UCB. His institution has received financial support in the last 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Biogen, Bayer, Celgene/BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, and TEVA ratiopharm) and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, and TEVA. GB has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene, Roche and Teva. AZ has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaking honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. FDe has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Almirall, Alexion, Biogen, Celgene, Genzyme-Sanofi, Merck, Novartis Pharma, Roche, and TEVA ratiopharm. His institution has received research grants from Biogen and Genzyme Sanofi. He is section editor of the MSARD Journal (Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders). MR was supported by a research support from Euroimmun and Roche. His institution receives payments for antibody assays (MOG, AQP4, and other autoantibodies) and for MOG and AQP4 antibody validation experiments organized by Euroimmun (Lübeck, Germany). HH has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Siemens, Teva, and received honoraria for acting as consultant for Biogen and Teva. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Di Pauli, Morschewsky, Berek, Auer, Bauer, Berger, Bsteh, Rhomberg, Schanda, Zinganell, Deisenhammer, Reindl and Hegen.)

Background and Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic challenges neurologists in counseling multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with respect to their risk for and by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and in guiding disease-modifying treatment (DMT). The objective was to determine the frequency and distribution of currently known risk factors for COVID-19 mortality in an MS population., Methods: Multiple sclerosis patients with at least one complete case report between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 from the Innsbruck MS database were cross-sectionally included. Frequencies of currently estimated COVID-19 mortality risk factors were analyzed, and the cumulative risk was calculated by a recently developed score. For every risk group, the proportions of patients under DMT and immunosuppressive treatment were determined., Results: Of 1931 MS patients, 63.4% had low risk of COVID-19 mortality, 26% had mild risk, 8.8% had a moderate risk, whereas a combined 0.9% had high or very high risk of COVID-19 mortality. Of the patients at high or very high risk, only one patient received DMT and none had an immunosuppressive therapy., Conclusions: In a population-based MS cohort, the proportion of patients at high risk of COVID-19 mortality is below 1%. Importantly, the vast majority of these MS patients did not receive any DMT., (© 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Multiple sclerosis is a complex, autoimmune-mediated disease of the central nervous system characterized by inflammatory demyelination and axonal/neuronal damage. The approval of various disease-modifying therapies and our increased understanding of disease mechanisms and evolution in recent years have significantly changed the prognosis and course of the disease. This update of the Multiple Sclerosis Therapy Consensus Group treatment recommendation focuses on the most important recommendations for disease-modifying therapies of multiple sclerosis in 2021. Our recommendations are based on current scientific evidence and apply to those medications approved in wide parts of Europe, particularly German-speaking countries (Germany, Austria, Switzerland)., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic challenges neurologists in counselling patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) regarding their risk by SARS-CoV-2 and in guiding disease-modifying treatment (DMT)., Objective: To characterize the prevalence and outcome of COVID-19 in pwMS specifically associated with different DMT in a nationwide population-based study., Methods: We included patients aged ≥18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of MS and a diagnosis of COVID-19 established between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020. We classified COVID-19 course as either mild, severe or fatal. Impact of DMT and specifically immunosuppressants (alemtuzumab, cladribine, fingolimod, ocrelizumab or rituximab) on COVID-19 outcome was determined by multivariable models, adjusted for a-priori-risk., Results: Of 126 MS patients with COVID-19 (mean age 43.2 years [SD 13.4], 71% female), 86.5% had a mild course, 9.5% a severe course and 3.2% died from COVID-19. A-priori-risk significantly predicted COVID-19 severity (R2 0.814; p<0.001) and mortality (R2 0.664; p<0.001). Adjusting for this a-priori-risk, neither exposure to any DMT nor exposure to specific immunosuppressive DMT were significantly associated with COVID-19 severity (odds ratio [OR] 1.6; p = 0.667 and OR 1.9; p = 0.426) or mortality (OR 0.5; p = 0.711 and 2.1; 0.233) when compared to no DMT., Conclusions: In a population-based MS cohort, COVID-19 outcome was not associated with exposure to DMT and immunosuppressive DMT when accounting for other already known risk factors. This provides reassuring evidence that COVID-19 risk can be individually anticipated in MS and-except for a very small proportion of high-risk patients-treatment decisions should be primarily focused on treating MS rather than the pandemic., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Gabriel Bsteh: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Roche and Teva. Hamid Assar: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. Harald Hegen: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Siemens and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Novartis and Teva. Bettina Heschl: has nothing to disclose. Fritz Leutmezer: has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. Franziska Di Pauli: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche and Teva. Christiane Gradl: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, consultations) and/or travel funding from Biogen, D-Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. Gerhard Traxler: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. Gudrun Zulehner: has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. Paulus Rommer: has received honoraria for consultancy/speaking from AbbVie, Allmiral, Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, has received research grants from Amicus, Biogen, Merck, Roche. Peter Wipfler: has received funding for travel and honoraria (lectures, advisory boards) from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. Michael Guger: has received support and honoraria for research, consultation, lectures and education from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Genzyme, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Shire and Teva. Christian Enzinger: has received funding for travel and speaker honoraria from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Shire and Teva. has received research support from Biogen, Celgene, Merck, and Teva; is serving on scientific advisory boards for Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Teva. Thomas Berger: has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Bayer, Biogen, Bionorica, Celgene, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, Teva) and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Background: Reports on typical routine cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings are outdated owing to novel reference limits (RL) and revised diagnostic criteria of Multiple Sclerosis (MS)., Objective: To assess routine CSF parameters in MS patients and the frequency of pathologic findings by applying novel RL., Methods: CSF white blood cells (WBC), CSF total protein (CSF-TP), CSF/serum albumin quotient (Q alb ), intrathecal synthesis of immunoglobulins (Ig) A, M and G, oligoclonal IgG bands (OCB) were determined in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and MS., Results: Of 541 patients 54% showed CSF pleocytosis with a WBC count up to 40/μl. CSF cytology revealed lymphocytes, monocytes and neutrophils in 99%, 41% and 9% of patients. CSF-TP and Q alb were increased in 19% and 7% applying age-corrected RL as opposed to 34% and 26% with conventional RL. Quantitative intrathecal IgG, IgA and IgM synthesis were present in 65%, 14% and 21%; OCB in 95% of patients. WBC were higher in relapsing than progressive MS and predicted, together with monocytes, the conversion from CIS to clinically definite MS. Intrathecal IgG fraction was highest in secondary progressive MS., Conclusions: CSF profile in MS varies across disease courses. Blood-CSF-barrier dysfunction and intrathecal IgA/IgM synthesis are less frequent when the novel RL are applied., Competing Interests: KB has participated in meetings sponsored by and received travel funding from Roche and Biogen. GB has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Teva. MA received speaker honoraria and/or travel grants from Biogen, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi. FP has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, Celgene and Roche. Her institution has received research grants from Roche. AZ has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaking honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. TB has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Biogen, Biologix, Bionorica, Celgene, Eisei, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, UCB. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva) and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Teva. FD has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Almirall, Alexion, Biogen, Celgene, Genzyme-Sanofi, Merck, Novartis Pharma, Roche, and TEVA ratiopharm. His institution has received research grants from Biogen and Genzyme Sanofi. He is section editor of the MSARD Journal (Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders). HH has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Siemens, Teva, and received honoraria for acting as consultant for Teva and Biogen., (Copyright © 2021 Berek, Bsteh, Auer, Di Pauli, Zinganell, Berger, Deisenhammer and Hegen.)