Search

Aims: The use of loop diuretics in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is less frequent compared with heart failure. The clinical and prognostic characteristics of PAH patients according to loop diuretic use remain unexplored. In this study, we retrospectively analysed the characteristics and survival of PAH patients requiring different doses of loop diuretics. Methods and results: Patients diagnosed with PAH between 2001 and 2022 at seven European centres for the management of PAH. According to the median equivalent dose of furosemide in the overall cohort, patients were divided into two subgroups: no/low‐dose loop diuretic and high‐dose loop diuretic. Primary outcome was 5 year all‐cause mortality. Among the 397 patients included, 227 (57%) were treated with loop diuretics. Median daily furosemide equivalent dose was 25 mg, and accordingly patients were divided in no/low dose (i.e. ≤25 mg, n = 257, 65%) vs. high dose (i.e. >25 mg, n = 140, 35%). Patients in the high‐dose group were older, more likely to have comorbidities, and had a more severe disease according to the ESC/ERS risk category. Crude 5 year survival was significantly shorter in patients in the high‐dose group, but after adjustment for age, sex, and risk category, high loop diuretic dose was not significantly associated with the primary outcome. Conclusions: Use of high dose of loop diuretics in PAH is associated with a higher burden of comorbidities, more severe disease, and worse survival. However, in PAH, the need of high loop diuretic dose is a marker of disease severity and not an independent prognostic factor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: If properly evaluated, chronic kidney disease can be found in up to 50% of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The renal resistive index (RRI) is a marker of intrarenal vascular resistance and can predict SSc-associated vasculopathy. This study aimed to determine the impact of bosentan, a nonselective endothelin-1 receptor antagonist, on RRI and kidney function in SSc patients with recurrent digital ulcers. Methods: Twenty-one patients (age 57 ± 9 years, 19 females) were recruited in a 16-week prospective open-label uncontrolled study. Standardized procedures were used to measure general clinical and laboratory characteristics, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse pressure (PP), diastolic to systolic blood pressure (D/S) ratio, and urinary endothelin-1 levels. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation was used to calculate kidney function as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). RRI was measured by Doppler ultrasound as the average of three samplings of intrarenal blood flow in different kidney regions of both kidneys. Patients with secondary causes of kidney disease or kidney diseases associated with albuminuria were excluded. Results: Bosentan treatment for 16 weeks did not change RRI (0.731 ± 0.049–0.730 ± 0.054, p = 0.925), but increased urine endothelin-1 to creatinine ratio (0.27 ± 0.15–0.49 ± 0.57 pg/mg, p = 0.032) and reduced MAP (123 ± 10–101 ± 11 mm Hg, p < 0.001), PP (76 ± 11–68 ± 10 mm Hg, p = 0.003), D/S ratio (0.563 ± 0.044–0.538 ± 0.031, p = 0.006), and eGFR (92 ± 20–84 ± 24 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.003). Discussion/Conclusion: In conclusion, in patients with SSc complicated by digital ulcers and normal to mildly diminished kidney function, bosentan had no effect on intrarenal hemodynamics, but reduced blood pressure levels and kidney function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE The study aimed to evaluate the performance of radiology residents (RRs) when using a dedicated structured report (SR) template for chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in patients with suspected connective tissue disease-interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), compared to the traditional narrative report (NR). METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 50 HRCT exams in patients with suspected CTD-ILD. A chestdevoted radiologist reported all HRCT exams as the reference standard, pointing out pulmonary fibrosis findings (i.e., honeycombing, traction bronchiectasis, reticulation, and volume loss), the presence and pattern of ILD, and possible other diagnoses. We divided 4 RRs into 2 groups according to their expertise level. In each group, RRs reported all HRCT examinations alternatively with NR or SR, noting each report's reporting time. The Cohen's Kappa, Wilcoxon, and McNemar tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Regarding the pulmonary fibrosis findings, we found higher agreement between RRs and the reference standard reader when using SR than NR, regardless of their expertise level, except for volume loss. RRs' accuracy for "other diagnosis" was higher when using SR than NR, moving from 0.48 to 0.66 in the novel group (P = .035) and from 0.44 to 0.80 in the expertise group (P < .001). No differences in accuracy were found between ILD presence and ILD pattern. The reporting time was significantly lower (P = .001) when using SR than NR. CONCLUSION SR is of value in increasing the reporting of critical chest HRCT findings in the complex CTD-ILD scenario and should be used early and systematically during residency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]