Search

Background: This detailed analysis further characterizes the safety profile of talazoparib plus enzalutamide in the ongoing randomized, phase III TALAPRO-2 study in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In both the all-comers and homologous recombination repair (HRR)-deficient populations, talazoparib plus enzalutamide significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival compared with placebo plus enzalutamide., Methods: The talazoparib plus enzalutamide safety populations in TALAPRO-2 included 398 patients from cohort 1 (all-comers, unselected for HRR gene alterations) and 198 patients from the combined HRR-deficient population (patients from the all-comers population with HRR gene alterations plus subsequently enrolled patients with HRR gene alterations; cohort 2). Patients received talazoparib 0.5 mg (0.35 mg, moderate renal impairment) and enzalutamide 160 mg once daily. Safety analyses evaluated common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), their type, severity, timing, seriousness, and relationship to study treatment., Results: In the all-comers (n = 398) and HRR-deficient populations (n = 198), all-cause grade 3/4 (G3/4) TEAEs with talazoparib plus enzalutamide were reported in 71.9 % and 66.2 % of patients, respectively. Most common G3/4 hematologic TEAEs were anemia (46.7 % and 40.9 %, respectively), neutropenia (18.3 % and 18.7 %), and thrombocytopenia (7.3 % and 7.1 %). Median time to event was 3.3 and 3.3 months for G3/4 anemia, 2.3 and 2.3 months for G3/4 neutropenia, and 2.3 and 1.5 months for G3/4 thrombocytopenia. Maximum hemoglobin reduction occurred after 13 and 15 weeks of treatment. 18.8 % and 10.1 % of patients discontinued talazoparib. TEAEs were managed with dose interruption (62.1 % and 57.6 %), reduction (52.8 % and 52.0 %), hematologic supportive care (13.1 % and 10.6 %), and packed red blood cell transfusions (39.2 % and 35.9 %)., Conclusion: Talazoparib plus enzalutamide had a generally manageable safety profile in patients with mCRPC within the all-comers and the HRR-deficient populations., Gov Identifier: NCT03395197., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Arun A. Azad reports honoraria from Aculeus Therapeutics, Amgen, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Noxopharm, Pfizer, Sanofi, Telix Pharmaceuticals, and Tolmar; consulting fees from Aculeus Therapeutics, Astellas Pharma, Janssen, and Novartis; participation on advisory boards for Amgen, Arvinas, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Noxopharm, Pfizer, Sanofi, Telix, and Tolmar; participation on a data safety monitoring board for OncoSec; research funding (institution unless stated otherwise) from Aptevo Therapeutics, Astellas Pharma (investigator), AstraZeneca (investigator), Bionomics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Hinova Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Janssen, Lilly, MedImmune, Merck Serono (investigator), Merck Serono (institutional), MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Synthorx; and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Hinova Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, and Tolmar; and support for medical writing services from Astellas Pharma, Exelixis, and Pfizer; he is Chair of the Urologic Oncology Group for the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia, and Chair of the Translational Research Subcommittee and on the Scientific Advisory Committee for the ANZUP Cancer Trials Group. Karim Fizazi reports honoraria (institution) for participation in advisory boards and talks from Advanced Accelerator Applications/Novartis, Amgen, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Clovis Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; and honoraria (personal) for participation in advisory boards from Arvinas, CureVac, MacroGenics, and Orion. Nobuaki Matsubara reports honoraria (personal) from Sanofi; research funding (institution) from Amgen, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, PRA Health Science, Roche, Seagen, Taiho, and Takeda; and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses (personal) from Pfizer. Fred Saad reports a consulting or advisory role for AbbVie, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bayer, Janssen Oncology, Knight Therapeutics, Myovant Sciences, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; honoraria from AbbVie, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen Oncology, Knight Therapeutics, Merck, Myovant Sciences, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; and research funding to their institution from Advanced Accelerator Applications, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen Oncology, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi. Ugo De Giorgi reports a consulting or advisory role for Amgen, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dompé Farmaceutici, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck KGaA, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer; research funding (institution) from AstraZeneca, Roche, and Sanofi; and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Ipsen and Pfizer. Jae Young Joung declares no competing interests. Peter C. C. Fong reports a consulting or advisory role for MSD and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Pfizer. Robert J. Jones reports honoraria from Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Serono, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche; a consulting or advisory role for Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; research funding from Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Clovis Oncology, Exelixis, and Roche; and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Bayer and Janssen. Stefanie Zschäbitz reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen (personal and institution), Astellas Pharma (personal and institution), Bayer (personal and institution), Bristol Myers Squibb (personal and institution), Eisai (personal), Gilead Sciences (personal), Janssen (personal), Merck Serono (personal and institution), MSD (institution), Novartis (personal), and Pfizer (personal and institution); participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Amgen (personal and institution), Bayer (personal and institution), Bristol Myers Squibb (institution), Eisai (personal), Gilead Sciences (personal), Ipsen (personal), Janssen (personal), Merck Serono (personal and institution), MSD (institution), Novartis (personal), and Pfizer (institution); research funding (institution) from Eisai; and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Amgen, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Serono, MSD, and Pfizer. Jan Oldenburg reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS Norway, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, and Roche; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, and Roche; and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Astellas Pharma. Neal D. Shore reports a consulting or advisory role for AbbVie, Alessa Therapeutics, Akido, Amgen, Arquer, Asieris, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CG Oncology, Clarity Pharmaceuticals, Clovis Oncology, Dendreon, Exact Imaging, Exact Sciences, FerGene, Ferring, FIZE Medical, Foundation Medicine, GenesisCare, Genentech, Guardant Health, ImmunityBio, Incyte, Invitae, Janssen, Lantheus, Lilly, Mdxhealth, Merck, Minomic, Myovant Sciences, Myriad Genetics, Nymox, Pacific Edge Biotechnology, Pfizer, Photocure, PlatformQ, ProFound, Promaxo, Propella Therapeutics, Protara, Sanofi, Sesen Bio, Specialty Networks, Telix Pharmaceuticals, Tolmar, UroGen Pharma, Vaxiion, and Vessi; providing expert testimony for Ferring; and leadership or other fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy group with Photocure. Curtis Dunshee reports participation on advisory boards for Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Janssen, and Pfizer; and research funding from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Dendreon, Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Laekna Therapeutics, Myovant Sciences, and Pfizer. Joan Carles reports a consulting or advisory role for Advanced Accelerator Applications/Novartis, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Johnson & Johnson, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi; participation in speakers’ bureaus for Astellas Pharma, Bayer, and Johnson & Johnson; research funding (institution) from AB Science, Aragon Pharmaceuticals, AROG Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca AB, AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Bayer AG, Blueprint Medicines, BN ImmunoTherapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim España SA, Bristol Myers Squibb International Corporation, Clovis Oncology, Cougar Biotechnology, Deciphera, Exelixis, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Janssen-Cilag International NV, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Laboratoires Leurquin Mediolanum, Lilly, MedImmune, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Nanobiotix, Novartis Farmacéutica SA, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnology, Roche, Sanofi Aventis GmbH, SFJ Pharmaceuticals Group, and Teva; and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from AstraZeneca, BMS, Ipsen, and Roche. Andre P. Fay reports honoraria from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; a consulting or advisory role for Bayer, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; stock or stock options in Brazilian Information Oncology; and research funding from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, CAPES – CNPq, Foundation Medicine, Ipsen, MSD, and Roche; and travel, accommodations and/or expenses from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, BMS, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. Xun Lin, Liza DeAnnuntis, and Michael A. Zielinski are employees of Pfizer and may hold Pfizer stock/stock options. Nicola Di Santo is a former employee of Pfizer and may hold Pfizer stock/stock options. Neeraj Agarwal (lifetime disclosures): No personal COIs since April 15, 2021. Consultancy to Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera, Clovis, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Foundation Medicine, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, MEI Pharma, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, and Seattle Genetics. Research funding to institution (lifetime): Arvinas, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bavarian Nordic, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera, Celldex, Clovis, CRISPR, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunomedics, Janssen, Lava, Medivation, Merck, Nektar, Neoleukin, NewLink Genetics, Novartis, ORIC, Pfizer, Prometheus, Rexahn, Roche, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, Telix, and TRACON., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

What Is This Summary About?: This summary describes the results from the TALAPRO-2 research study (also known as a clinical trial). The TALAPRO-2 study tested the combination of two medicines called talazoparib plus enzalutamide. This combination of medicines was used as the first treatment for adult patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The combination of talazoparib plus enzalutamide was compared with a placebo plus enzalutamide., What Is Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer?: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is a type of cancer that starts in the prostate and has spread to other parts of the body. Castration-resistant means that the cancer continues to grow even when testosterone levels in the blood are reduced to very low levels. Taking medicines to lower testosterone levels in the blood is a standard treatment for men with advanced prostate cancer., What Are the Aims of the Talapro-2 Trial?: TALAPRO-2 looked at if combining talazoparib plus enzalutamide would increase the length of time patients lived before their cancer got worse or they died compared with a placebo plus enzalutamide. Researchers looked at how treatment affected the size and number of tumors and the length of time before patients needed to change to a new cancer medicine. Researchers also looked at any side effects patients had during the study., What Are the Key Takeaways?: A total of 805 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer took part in the study. Compared with patients who took a placebo plus enzalutamide, the group of patients who took talazoparib plus enzalutamide had a 37% reduced risk of their cancer getting worse or dying. Some patients had tumors that at the start of the study could be measured with scans. Sixty-two percent of patients who took talazoparib plus enzalutamide had their tumors decrease or shrink to the point that they could no longer be seen on scans versus 44% of patients who took a placebo plus enzalutamide. Patients who took talazoparib plus enzalutamide were more likely to have a longer time before they needed to change to a new cancer medicine. The most common side effects of talazoparib plus enzalutamide were low levels of red blood cells (66% of patients) and neutrophils (36% of patients), and excessive tiredness or exhaustion (34% of patients). Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03395197 (TALAPRO-2) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Preclinical evidence has suggested an interplay between the androgen receptor, which largely drives the growth of prostate cancer cells, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. This association provides a rationale for their co-inhibition for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), an area of unmet medical need. The phase 3 TALAPRO-2 study investigated combining the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor talazoparib with enzalutamide versus enzalutamide alone as first-line treatment of mCRPC. Patients were prospectively assessed for tumor alterations in DNA damage response genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR). Two cohorts were enrolled sequentially: an all-comers cohort that was enrolled first (cohort 1; N = 805 (169 were HRR-deficient)), followed by an HRR-deficient-only cohort (cohort 2; N = 230). We present results from the alpha-controlled primary analysis for the combined HRR-deficient population (N = 399). Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to talazoparib or placebo, plus enzalutamide. The primary endpoint, radiographic progression-free survival, was met (median not reached at the time of the analysis for the talazoparib group versus 13.8 months for the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.61; P < 0.0001). Data for overall survival, a key secondary endpoint, are immature but favor talazoparib (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 1.03; P = 0.07). Common adverse events in the talazoparib group were anemia, fatigue and neutropenia. Combining talazoparib with enzalutamide significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival in patients with mCRPC harboring HRR gene alterations, supporting talazoparib plus enzalutamide as a potential first-line treatment for these patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03395197 ., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Sustainability issues such as food insecurity, climate change, land degradation, economic development and food waste are the actual most important challenges at the global level. Among them, the food waste (FW) challenge has a great magnitude, emphasizing the importance of examining this issue. Specifically, there is a need to focus on the household level. Thus, this study aims to investigate and identify the main factors influencing FW household behaviors on which policymakers and stakeholders could outline specific and sustainable strategies. Starting from a large number of published studies on this subject with a similar aim but focusing on specific Countries or contexts, the goal of our study is achieved through the implementation of a systematic literature review followed by a bibliometric review using the VOSviewer software. The selected query generated a total of 235 matching papers from which only 111 papers were collected for the bibliometric review because of the inclusion criteria. The analysis showed the existence of four major research strands: the largest one analyses the antecedents of behavior during food management, including the implementation of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Other detected topics are the economic impact of FW, the effects generated by the Covid-19 pandemic on consumer behaviors, and finally, the environmental and social effects of FW. The objective of this study is to investigate and identify the main factors influencing FW household behaviors. The obtained output represents useful information for policymakers and stakeholders to outline specific and sustainable strategies to reduce FW., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Pilone et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Co-inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and androgen receptor activity might result in antitumour efficacy irrespective of alterations in DNA damage repair genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of talazoparib (a PARP inhibitor) plus enzalutamide (an androgen receptor blocker) versus enzalutamide alone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)., Methods: TALAPRO-2 is a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial of talazoparib plus enzalutamide versus placebo plus enzalutamide as first-line therapy in men (age ≥18 years [≥20 years in Japan]) with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic mCRPC receiving ongoing androgen deprivation therapy. Patients were enrolled from 223 hospitals, cancer centres, and medical centres in 26 countries in North America, Europe, Israel, South America, South Africa, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients were prospectively assessed for HRR gene alterations in tumour tissue and randomly assigned (1:1) to talazoparib 0·5 mg or placebo, plus enzalutamide 160 mg, administered orally once daily. Randomisation was stratified by HRR gene alteration status (deficient vs non-deficient or unknown) and previous treatment with life-prolonging therapy (docetaxel or abiraterone, or both: yes vs no) in the castration-sensitive setting. The sponsor, patients, and investigators were masked to talazoparib or placebo, while enzalutamide was open-label. The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) by blinded independent central review, evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was evaluated in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03395197) and is ongoing., Findings: Between Jan 7, 2019, and Sept 17, 2020, 805 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (402 to the talazoparib group and 403 to the placebo group). Median follow-up for rPFS was 24·9 months (IQR 21·9-30·2) for the talazoparib group and 24·6 months (14·4-30·2) for the placebo group. At the planned primary analysis, median rPFS was not reached (95% CI 27·5 months-not reached) for talazoparib plus enzalutamide and 21·9 months (16·6-25·1) for placebo plus enzalutamide (hazard ratio 0·63; 95% CI 0·51-0·78; p<0·0001). In the talazoparib group, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia, neutropenia, and fatigue; the most common grade 3-4 event was anaemia (185 [46%] of 398 patients), which improved after dose reduction, and only 33 (8%) of 398 patients discontinued talazoparib due to anaemia. Treatment-related deaths occurred in no patients in the talazoparib group and two patients (<1%) in the placebo group., Interpretation: Talazoparib plus enzalutamide resulted in clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in rPFS versus standard of care enzalutamide as first-line treatment for patients with mCRPC. Final overall survival data and additional long-term safety follow-up will further clarify the clinical benefit of the treatment combination in patients with and without tumour HRR gene alterations., Funding: Pfizer., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests NA has received an honorarium for consultancy since May, 2020, from the following: Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, AVEO, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera Biosciences, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Foundation Medicine, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Immunomedics, Janssen, Lilly, and MEI Pharma, and research funding (institution) from Arvinas, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera Biosciences, Celldex, Clovis Oncology, CRISPR Therapeutics, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunomedics, Janssen, Lava, Lilly, Merck, Nektar, Neoleukin, Novartis, ORIC Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Rexahn, Roche, Sanofi, Seagen, Takeda, and TRACON. AAA reports honoraria from Aculeus Therapeutics, Amgen, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Noxopharm, Pfizer, Sanofi, Telix Pharmaceuticals, and Tolmar; consulting fees from Aculeus Therapeutics, Astellas Pharma, Janssen, and Novartis; participation on advisory boards for Amgen, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Noxopharm, Pfizer, Sanofi, Telix, and Tolmar; participation on a data safety monitoring board for OncoSec; research funding (institution unless stated otherwise) from Aptevo Therapeutics, Astellas Pharma (investigator), AstraZeneca (investigator), Bionomics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Hinova Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Janssen, Lilly, MedImmune, Merck Serono (investigator), MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Synthorx; and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Janssen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, and Tolmar; and receiving medical writing services from Astellas Pharma, Exelixis, and Pfizer; he is Chair of the Urologic Oncology Group for the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia, and Chair of the Translational Research Subcommittee and on the Scientific Advisory Committee for the ANZUP Cancer Trials Group. JC reports a consulting or advisory role for Advanced Accelerator Applications/Novartis, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi; participation in speakers' bureau for Astellas Pharma, Bayer, and Johnson & Johnson; research funding (institution) from AB Science, Aragon Pharmaceuticals, AROG Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, BN ImmunoTherapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim España, Bristol Myers Squibb International Corporation, Clovis Oncology, Cougar Biotechnology, Deciphera, Exelixis, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Janssen-Cilag International, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Laboratoires Leurquin Mediolanum, Lilly, MedImmune, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Nanobiotix, Novartis Farmacéutica, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnology, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, SFJ Pharmaceuticals Group, and Teva; and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from AstraZeneca, BMS, Ipsen, and Roche. APF reports honoraria from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; a consulting or advisory role for Bayer, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; stock or stock options in Brazilian Information Oncology; and research funding from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, CAPES – CNPq, Foundation Medicine, Ipsen, MSD, and Roche; and travel, accommodations and/or expenses from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, BMS, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. NM reports honoraria (personal) from Sanofi; research funding (institution) from Amgen, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, PRA Health Science, Roche, Seagen, Taiho, and Takeda; and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses (personal) from Pfizer. DH reports honoraria (personal) from Advanced Accelerator Applications/Novartis, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, EUSA Pharma, Ferring, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, and Novartis; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen, Novartis, Organon, Pfizer, and Roche; and research funding (institution) from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche. UDG reports a consulting or advisory role for Amgen, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, Dompé Farmaceutici, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and PharmaMar; research funding (institution) from AstraZeneca, Roche, and Sanofi; and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Ipsen and Pfizer. PCCF reports a consulting or advisory role for MSD and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Pfizer. RJJ reports honoraria from Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Serono, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche; a consulting or advisory role for Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; research funding from Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Clovis Oncology, Exelixis, and Roche; and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Bayer and Janssen. NDS reports a consulting or advisory role for AbbVie, Alessa Therapeutics, Akido, Amgen, Arquer, Asieris, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CG Oncology, Clarity Pharmaceuticals, Clovis Oncology, Dendreon, Exact Imaging, Exact Sciences, FerGene, FIZE Medical, Foundation Medicine, GenesisCare, Genentech, Guardant Ferring, ImmunityBio, Incyte, Invitae, Janssen, Lantheus, Lilly, Mdxhealth, Merck, Minomic, Myovant Sciences, Myriad Genetics, Nymox, Pacific Edge Biotechnology, Pfizer, Photocure, PlatformQ, Profound, Promaxo, Propella Therapeutics, Protara, Sanofi, Sesen Bio, Speciality Networks, Telix Pharmaceuticals, Tolmar, UroGen Pharma, Vaxiion, and Vessi; providing expert testimony for Ferring; and leadership or other fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy group with Photocure. CD reports participation on advisory boards for Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Janssen, and Pfizer; and research funding from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Dendreon, Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Laekna Therapeutics, Myovant Sciences, and Pfizer. SZ reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen (personal and institution), Bayer, (personal and institution), Bristol Myers Squibb (institution), Eisai (personal), Janssen (personal), MSD (institution), Novartis (personal), and Pfizer (institution); participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Amgen (personal and institution), Bayer (personal and institution), Bristol Myers Squibb (institution), Eisai (personal), Janssen (personal), MSD (institution), Novartis (personal), and Pfizer (institution); research funding (institution) from Eisai; and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Amgen, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, MSD, and Pfizer. JO reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS Norway, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, and Roche; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, and Roche; and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Astellas Pharma. XL, CGH, NDiS, and FZ are employees of Pfizer and may hold Pfizer stock/stock options. KF reports honoraria (institution) for participation in advisory boards and talks from Advanced Accelerator Applications/Novartis, Amgen, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Clovis Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; and honoraria (personal) for participation in advisory boards from Arvinas, CureVac, MacroGenics, and Orion. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The phase II TALAPRO-1 study (NCT03148795) demonstrated durable antitumor activity in men with heavily pretreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Here, we detail the safety profile of talazoparib., Patients and Methods: Men received talazoparib 1 mg/day (moderate renal impairment 0.75 mg/day) orally until radiographic progression, unacceptable toxicity, investigator decision, consent withdrawal, or death. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated: incidence, severity, timing, duration, potential overlap of selected AEs, dose modifications/discontinuations due to AEs, and new clinically significant changes in laboratory values and vital signs., Results: In the safety population (N = 127; median age 69.0 years), 95.3% (121/127) experienced all-cause treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Most common were anemia (48.8% [62/127]), nausea (33.1% [42/127]), decreased appetite (28.3% [36/127]), and asthenia (23.6% [30/127]). Nonhematologic TEAEs were generally grades 1 and 2. No grade 5 TEAEs or deaths were treatment-related. Hematologic TEAEs typically occurred during the first 4-5 months of treatment. The median duration of grade 3-4 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia was limited to 7-12 days. No grade 4 events of anemia or neutropenia occurred. Neither BRCA status nor alteration origin significantly impacted the safety profile. The median (range) treatment duration was 6.1 (0.4-24.9) months; treatment duration did not impact the incidence of anemia. Only 3 of the 15 (11.8% [15/127]) permanent treatment discontinuations were due to hematologic TEAEs (thrombocytopenia 1.6% [2/127]; leukopenia 0.8% [1/127])., Conclusion: Common TEAEs associated with talazoparib could be managed through dose modifications/supportive care. Demonstrated efficacy and a manageable safety profile support continued evaluation of talazoparib in mCRPC., Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03148795., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Study Objective: To retrospectively evaluate perioperative pain and analgesic and antiemetic use in patients who underwent surgical staging for endometrial cancer using traditional versus robotic-assisted laparoscopy., Design: We identified women in a single institution who underwent minimally hysterectomy for endometrial cancer from 2008 to 2012. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes, including analgesic and antiemetic use and pain scores, were analyzed. After univariate analysis, a multivariate linear regression model was generated to determine factors associated with narcotic use in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) (Canadian Task Force Classification II-3)., Setting: A single academic institution in the United States from 2008 to 2012., Patients: Women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy or robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer., Interventions: Laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy., Measurements and Main Results: Three hundred thirty-five women were included (213 laparoscopy and 122 robotic-assisted laparoscopy). There was no difference in pain scores at 0 to 6 and 6 to 12 hours after surgery; at 12 to 24 hours, robotic-assisted surgery was associated with higher median pain scores (5/10 vs 4/10, p = .012). Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with a longer anesthesia time (289 vs 255 minutes, p < .001), similar antiemetic use (p = .40), and lower narcotic use in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) (1.3 mg vs 2.5 mg morphine equivalents, p = .003). There was no difference in narcotic use on the postoperative floor (p = .46). In multivariate analysis controlling for age, menopausal status, anesthesia duration, and local anesthetic use, hysterectomy type was not a significant predictor of PACU narcotic use (p = .86)., Conclusions: In a retrospective analysis, a robotic-assisted approach to endometrial cancer was not associated with reduced PACU narcotic or antiemetic use compared with the traditional laparoscopic approach. Twenty-four-hour narcotic and antiemetic use was also not different between the 2 approaches., (Copyright © 2015 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cancer is a group of diseases characterized by uncontrolled cell proliferation, evasion of cell death and the ability to invade and disrupt vital tissue function. The classic model of carcinogenesis describes successive clonal expansion driven by the accumulation of mutations that eliminate restraints on proliferation and cell survival. It has been proposed that during cancer's development, the loose-knit colonies of only partially differentiated cells display some unicellular/prokaryotic behavior reminiscent of robust ancient life forms. The seeming "regression" of cancer cells involves changes within metabolic machinery and survival strategies. This atavist change in physiology enables cancer cells to behave as selfish "neo-endo-parasites" that exploit the tumor stromal cells in order to extract nutrients from the surrounding microenvironment. In this framework, it is conceivable that anti-parasitic compounds might serve as promising anticancer drugs. Nitazoxanide (NTZ), a thiazolide compound, has shown antimicrobial properties against anaerobic bacteria, as well as against helminths and protozoa. NTZ has also been successfully used to promote Hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination by improving interferon signaling and promoting autophagy. More compelling however are the potential anti-cancer properties that have been observed. NTZ seems to be able to interfere with crucial metabolic and pro-death signaling such as drug detoxification, unfolded protein response (UPR), autophagy, anti-cytokine activities and c-Myc inhibition. In this article, we review the ability of NTZ to interfere with integrated survival mechanisms of cancer cells and propose that this compound might be a potent addition to the current chemotherapeutic strategy against cancer., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine whether a minimally invasive approach to hysterectomy is associated with an increased rate of lymph vascular space invasion (LVSI) and/or malignant pelvic peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer., Methods: We performed a single institution analysis of 458 women with endometrial cancer who underwent either total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) or minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) with use of a disposable uterine manipulator. All patients had endometrial cancer diagnosed by endometrial biopsy at a single academic institution between 2002 and 2012. Exclusion criteria were pre-operative D&C and/or hysteroscopy, uterine perforation or morcellation, and conversion to laparotomy. Multivariate logistic regression models to determine if type of hysterectomy predicts either LVSI or presence of abnormal cytology were controlled for grade, stage, depth of invasion, tumor size, cervical and adnexal involvement., Results: LVSI was identified in 39/214 (18%) MIH and 44/242 (18%) TAH (p=0.99). Pelvic washings were malignant in 14/203 (7%) MIH and 16/241 (7%) TAH (p=1.0). Washings were atypical or inconclusive in 16/203 (8%) MIH and 6/241 (2.5%) TAH (p=0.014). In multivariate analyses, type of hysterectomy was not a significant predictor of either LVSI (p=0.29) or presence of malignant washings (p=0.66), but was a predictor of atypical or inconclusive washings (p=0.03)., Conclusion: Minimally invasive hysterectomy with use of a uterine manipulator for endometrial cancer is not associated with LVSI or malignant cytology. Algorithms that better determine the etiology and implications of inconclusive or atypical pelvic cytology are needed to inform the possible additional risk associated with a minimally invasive approach to endometrial cancer., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Among gynecological malignancies epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the leading cause of death. Despite improvements in conventional chemotherapy combinations, the overall cure rate has remained mostly stable over the years, and only 10%-15% of patients maintain a complete response following first-line therapy. To improve the efficacy of ovarian cancer chemotherapy it is essential to develop drugs with new mechanisms of action. Compared to normal tissues, protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) is overexpressed in ovarian tumors. PDI is a cellular enzyme in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of eukaryotes or the periplasmic region of prokaryotes. This protein catalyzes the formation and breakage of disulphide bonds between cysteine residues in proteins, which affects protein folding. Selective inhibition of PDI activity has been exhibited both in vitro and in vivo anticancer activity in human ovarian cancer models. PDI inhibition caused accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins, which led to ER stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR), and in turn resulted in cell death. Nitazoxanide [NTZ: 2-acetyloxy-N-(5-nitro-2-thiazolyl)benzamide] is a thiazolide antiparasitic agent with excellent activity against a wide variety of protozoa and helminths. In this article, we propose that NTZ, acting as PDI inhibitor, may be a new and potent addition to the chemotherapeutic strategy against ovarian cancer.

Objective: To assess the impact of obesity severity on hysterectomy outcomes for uterine hyperplasia/cancer., Methods: The data from women undergoing hysterectomies for endometrial hyperplasia/uterine cancer with a BMI≥30 kg/m(2) were abstracted from records at the University of Virginia and Duke University following IRB approval. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed., Results: Mean age of the 659 patients was 58.1 yrs; mean body mass index (BMI) was 43 kg/m(2). Women were grouped based on BMI: 39.6% (261) were obese (30-39 kg/m(2)), 41.7% (275) were morbidly obese (40-49 kg/m(2)) and 18.7% (123) were super obese (≥50 kg/m(2)). Minimally invasive surgical procedures (MIS) were attempted in 280 patients with a conversion rate of 16.1%; BMI was higher in the converted group (47.3 vs. 40.6 kg/m(2); p<0.001). As obesity group increased, there was a decreased frequency of lymphadenectomy (63.8% vs. 37.1% vs. 20.3%; p<0.001), increased blood loss (242 vs. 281 vs. 378 mL; p<0.001) and fewer nodes removed (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, type of surgery (open vs. MIS) and obesity classification were independently and significantly associated with wound complications (p<0.001) and the presence of postoperative complications (p<0.001, p=0.003). Surgical staging with lymphadenectomy was significantly associated with obesity (p<0.001) but not procedure type (p=0.11). Blood transfusion (p<0.001), hospital readmission (p=0.025), and ileus (p<0.001) were significantly associated with open procedures but not obesity. There were no significant differences in progression-free or disease-specific survival based on obesity group., Conclusion: Women with BMI's exceeding 40 kg/m(2) have worse surgical outcomes than their less obese counterparts., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To validate the Mayo algorithm to intraoperatively identify women with endometrial cancer in whom lymphadenectomy may be safely omitted., Methods: A multi-center retrospective chart review 1977-2010 was completed using two independent institutional endometrial cancer databases. Eligibility criteria were grade 1 or 2 endometrial carcinoma, low-risk histology, and myometrial invasion ≤ 50% on intraoperative pathology consultation; patients were considered to satisfy the Mayo criteria if, in addition to these, tumor diameter on the final pathology report was ≤ 2 cm. Analysis of nodal metastases, recurrent disease, and progression-free survival (PFS) using the Kaplan-Meier method was performed., Results: Six hundred and two patients met inclusion criteria for the study. Of 110 patients satisfying the Mayo algorithm with an adequate lymphadenectomy, 2 (1.8%) were diagnosed with lymph node metastasis and 4 (3.6%) subsequently developed recurrent disease. The Mayo algorithm identified with a 98.2% negative predictive value women who would not benefit from a lymphadenectomy. There was no significant difference in recurrence rate or PFS between women who underwent lymphadenectomy and those who did not when the Mayo algorithm was satisfied., Conclusions: The Mayo algorithm intraoperatively identifies tumor characteristics of low-risk disease in endometrial carcinoma that predict a very low likelihood of nodal metastasis and recurrence. Although a small number of patients with advanced stage disease may be missed when applying the Mayo criteria, there is no apparent survival benefit to lymphadenectomy for patients satisfying this algorithm, and these data support its use at other institutions., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)