Search

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is globally the third most prevalent cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. In Alberta, Canada, a significant portion of CRC diagnoses occur following emergency department (ED) presentations. Gaps remain in understanding patient's perspectives on CRC diagnosis after an ED visit. The aim of this study was to examine the experiences and perspectives of a group of patients diagnosed with CRC subsequent to an ED visit in Alberta and their close contacts. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with patients diagnosed with CRC after an ED visit at the Rockyview General Hospital, Calgary, and their close contacts, from November 2022 to June 2023. Interviews focused on symptom recognition, healthcare interactions, and the decision-making process leading to an ED visit. They were conducted in-person or over the phone, and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Eighteen participants (12 patients and 6 close contacts) were interviewed, revealing four main themes: (1) variability in symptom recognition and interpretation; (2) inconsistencies in primary care consultations; (3) factors influencing decision-making leading to an ED visit; and (4) recommendations for expedited diagnosis outside of EDs. Conclusion: The findings highlight the complexity of the diagnostic journey for CRC patients in Alberta, pointing to significant gaps in symptom recognition and response by patients and healthcare providers. Improved diagnostic protocols and targeted support for healthcare providers, as well as approaches to address systemic delays may help streamline the diagnostic journey. Future research should focus on exploring innovative interventions to address the identified barriers to timely CRC diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has halted the progress of India made towards the ambition of achieving Tuberculosis (TB)-free status by 2025. Steps taken to control the disease have affected many national health programs, including those for TB. Aim: To understand the delays in diagnosing and initiating therapy among TB patients receiving Antitubercular Therapy (ATT) during the early COVID-19 pandemic period. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Sonepat District of Haryana state, India. The study was conducted among 20% of the total Nikshay Portal-notified TB patients who received treatment from the public sector in the second and third quarters of 2020. Data was collected using a pretested semistructured schedule consisting of variables related to demography, past medical history, symptoms leading to TB diagnosis, place of diagnosis, time between symptom onset and diagnosis, duration taken for initiating therapy, and reasons for delays. The Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used to test the significance of the differences. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: 'Diagnostic Time delay' was observed among 86 (35.1%) of the participants, with a 30-day median delay. 'ATT initiation delays' were observed in 51 (20.8%) with a four-day median delay, and 23 (8.6%) of patients reported at least one episode of treatment interruption. 'Being diagnosed for other diseases' 70 (28.6%) and 'ignoring symptoms' 28 (11.4%) constituted the major reasons for 'Diagnostic time delay'. The non availability of drugs 11 (47.8%) and discomfort with drugs 07 (30.4%) were the major reasons for treatment interruption. Conclusion: Ignorance of symptoms and suspicion of other diseases constituted diagnostic delays, and therapy initiations were prolonged more during the pandemic period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Introduction: Over the past decade, the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) proposed the option of diagnosing coeliac disease (CD) in children without duodenal biopsy. The aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic approach in newly diagnosed children with CD in Slovenia. Methods: In this prospective study, Slovenian paediatric gastroenterologists were invited to provide medical records of children under 19 years diagnosed with CD from March 2021 to October 2023. The analysis focused on tissue transglutaminase antibody (TGA) levels at diagnosis, diagnostic approach, adherence to ESPGHAN CD guidelines and diagnostic delays. Results: Data from 160 newly diagnosed CD patients (61.9% female; median age 8 years; 16.9% asymptomatic) were available for the analysis. No-biopsy approach was used in 65% (N = 104) of children and the majority (N = 101) fulfilled all the criteria for the no-biopsy approach. Of 56 children diagnosed using duodenal biopsy, a further 10 (17.8%) would have also been eligible for the no-biopsy approach based on the very high levels of TGA. Median diagnostic delay from first symptoms to confirmation of diagnosis was 6 months (min 0 months, max 87 months). Use of the no-biopsy approach has risen significantly since 2016 (37.8% vs. 65.0%; p = 0.001) and diagnostic delays have shortened (6 vs. 7 months; p < 0.05). Conclusion: This prospective study highlights the frequent use of a no-biopsy approach for diagnosing CD in children in Slovenia, showing large adherence to ESPGHAN guidelines. Also, diagnostic delays have shortened over recent years, likely due to various awareness-raising projects on CD conducted during this period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has halted the progress of India made towards the ambition of achieving Tuberculosis (TB)-free status by 2025. Steps taken to control the disease have affected many national health programs, including those for TB. Aim: To understand the delays in diagnosing and initiating therapy among TB patients receiving Antitubercular Therapy (ATT) during the early COVID-19 pandemic period. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Sonepat District of Haryana state, India. The study was conducted among 20% of the total Nikshay Portal-notified TB patients who received treatment from the public sector in the second and third quarters of 2020. Data was collected using a pretested semistructured schedule consisting of variables related to demography, past medical history, symptoms leading to TB diagnosis, place of diagnosis, time between symptom onset and diagnosis, duration taken for initiating therapy, and reasons for delays. The Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used to test the significance of the differences. A p-value

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is globally the third most prevalent cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. In Alberta, Canada, a significant portion of CRC diagnoses occur following emergency department (ED) presentations. Gaps remain in understanding patient’s perspectives on CRC diagnosis after an ED visit. The aim of this study was to examine the experiences and perspectives of a group of patients diagnosed with CRC subsequent to an ED visit in Alberta and their close contacts. Methods We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with patients diagnosed with CRC after an ED visit at the Rockyview General Hospital, Calgary, and their close contacts, from November 2022 to June 2023. Interviews focused on symptom recognition, healthcare interactions, and the decision-making process leading to an ED visit. They were conducted in-person or over the phone, and analysed using thematic analysis. Results Eighteen participants (12 patients and 6 close contacts) were interviewed, revealing four main themes: (1) variability in symptom recognition and interpretation; (2) inconsistencies in primary care consultations; (3) factors influencing decision-making leading to an ED visit; and (4) recommendations for expedited diagnosis outside of EDs. Conclusion The findings highlight the complexity of the diagnostic journey for CRC patients in Alberta, pointing to significant gaps in symptom recognition and response by patients and healthcare providers. Improved diagnostic protocols and targeted support for healthcare providers, as well as approaches to address systemic delays may help streamline the diagnostic journey. Future research should focus on exploring innovative interventions to address the identified barriers to timely CRC diagnosis.

Diagnosis and effective treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) are often delayed due to inadequate awareness and poor patient-physician communication. Some AxSpA patients fail to maintain an active lifestyle by exercising regularly, further worsening their disease management. The evolving concept of patient-centred care necessitates better understanding of patient awareness and their needs. We aimed to survey AxSpA patients to reflect on healthcare planning and management perspectives. Our self-administered questionnaire focused on perceptions of AxSpA diagnosis and management, particularly exploring issues of physical activity and active lifestyle. Satisfaction with AxSpA medical care and its accessibility, diagnostic delays, patient-physician communication, and support for disease management were also explored. This offline survey was arranged at the Department of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Internal Medicine of Jagiellonian University Medical College and Krakow University Hospital. We surveyed patients with AxSpA attending outpatient clinics between December 1st, 2023 and April 22nd, 2024. The questionnaire included questions on types of physical activities, barriers to exercising, satisfaction with medical care, patient-physician interactions, diagnostic delays, and use of teleconsultations. A total of 117 patients with AxSpA were enrolled (mean age 41.62 years). The majority (n = 93, 79.5%) were employed. There was a male predominance (69, 59%). The average diagnostic delay was 5.5 years. Notably, 104 (88.9%) responders perceived physical activity as a factor influencing their disease course. However, only 32 (27.35%) managed to exercise regularly (≥ 30 min, 2–3 times a week). The majority (70, 59.83%) were irregularly engaged in some form of physical activity, with 15 (12.8%) not exercising at all, and nearly half (48%) reported at least one barrier to maintaining a physically active lifestyle. Pain (32, 27.35%), fatigue (27, 23.08%), lack of motivation (17, 14.53%), and lack of time (12, 10.26%) were noted as barriers to exercising. The respondents preferred to exercise at home. The survey identified critical areas where patient dissatisfaction or uncertainty were notably prevalent: 38 (32.5%) were uncertain and 35 (30%) were dissatisfied with rehabilitation access. For spa therapy, 63 (53.85%) reported uncertainty and 23 (19.7%) expressed dissatisfaction. Only 48 (41%) were treated by a rehabilitation specialist last year. Only 23% of AxSpA patients took part in teleconsultations last year, and 65% preferred in-person visits. While AxSpA patients recognize the importance of physical activity, significant barriers exist to engaging them regularly in exercising. Addressing these barriers through personalized, motivational, and educational strategies could improve patient outcomes. Improving patient satisfaction with healthcare services, particularly in areas of rehabilitation and physician-patient communication, is crucial for improving the overall care of AxSpA patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Delays in the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) can increase the risk of transmission, thereby posing a significant risk to public health. Early diagnosis is considered to play a crucial role in eliminating TB. Rapid testing, active case finding, and health education are effective strategies for reducing tuberculosis diagnosis delays (TDDs). This study aimed to quantitatively compare the impact of reducing the TDD on incidence rates among student and non-student groups, thus exploring the efficacy of shortening the TDD for ending the TB epidemic and providing a reference for achieving the target incidence rate for ending TB. Methods: We used unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis and non-parametric tests to characterize the epidemiological characteristics of TDD. Additionally, a dynamic transmission model was used to quantify the impact of shortening the TDD on the incidence rates of TB among the two groups. Results: There was an initial increase in the TDD, followed by a decrease. Longer TDDs were observed in the northeastern region of China. Farmers, middle and high school students, middle-aged, elderly individuals and males exhibited relatively longer TDDs. A significant reduction in the incidence rate of PTB was observed when the TDD was decreased by 50 %. However, only reducing the TDD among non-students could achieve the goal of ending TB (i.e., achieving a minimum reduction of 63.00 %). Conclusions: TDD remains a serious risk to public health, and non-students were shown to experience longer TDD. Shortening the TDD is crucial for reducing the incidence rates of TB, especially among non-students. It is essential to develop a highly sensitive and effective system for eliminating TB among non-students.

Introduction/Objectives: The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) helps triage primary care patients at risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Improving FIT returns has received recent attention, however uncertainty exists regarding the accurate completion of samples provided for laboratory analysis. This study aims to identify the rejection rate of returned FIT samples and determine rejection causes. Methods: FIT samples from symptomatic patients within South Yorkshire, Bassetlaw, and North Derbyshire are processed at a central laboratory. Tests requests are made from 225 GP practices, which serve an estimated 2 million population. This study describes a retrospective review of FIT samples received in the central laboratory between 01/09/19 and 31/12/22. Locally held data was interrogated in March 2023 to determine the number of FIT samples received and rejected during the study period. Documented reasons for rejection were explored to identify common themes. Results: Total FIT specimens received during the study period was 126 422. Of these, 5190 (4.1%) were rejected. Monthly rejection rates fell from 17.4% in September 2019 to 1.3% in December 2022 (P <.001). Sampling errors were the most frequent cause for FIT rejection (2151/5190), with other causes including: expired specimen; no sample collection date/ time, no request form, incomplete patient information and illegible handwriting. Conclusions: This is the first study exploring FIT rejection rates in symptomatic primary care patients, which shows improvements in rejection rates over time. Targeted interventions could improve rejection rates further, thereby reducing NHS resource use and costs and diagnostic delays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionMultiple Myeloma (MM) is classified as one of the most challenging cancers to diagnose, and the hematological malignancy is associated with prolonged diagnostic delays. Although major steps have been made in the improvement of MM patient diagnosis and care, Romanian patients still face long diagnostic delays. Thus far, there have been no studies evaluating the factors associated with diagnostic errors in Romanian MM patients.MethodsUsing the Aarhus statement, we prospectively determined the diagnostic intervals for 103 patients diagnosed with MM at Fundeni Clinical Institute, between January 2022 and March 2023.ResultsOur data revealed that the main diagnostic delays are experienced during the “patient interval.” Patients spend a median of 162 days from the first symptom onset until the first doctor appointment. Bone pain is the most frequently reported symptom by patients (78.64%), but it leads to a medical-seeking behavior in only half of the reporting patients and results in a median delay of 191 days. The changes in routine lab tests are considered most worrisome for patients, leading to a medical appointment after a median of only 25 days. The median primary care interval was 70 days, with patients having an average of 3.7 medical visits until MM suspicion was first raised. The secondary care interval did not contribute to the diagnostic delays.DiscussionOverall, the median diagnostic path for MM patients in Romania was more than 6 months, leading to a higher number of emergency presentations and myeloma-related end-organ damage.

Histoplasmosis is often confused with other diseases leading to diagnostic delays. We estimated the incidence, length of, and risk factors for, diagnostic delays associated with histoplasmosis. Using data from IBM Marketscan, 2001-2017, we found all patients with a histoplasmosis diagnosis. We calculated the number of visits that occurred prior to the histoplasmosis diagnosis and the number of visits with symptomatically similar diagnoses (SSDs). Next, we estimated the number of visits that represented a delay using a simulation-based approach. We also computed the number of potential opportunities for diagnosis that were missed for each patient and the length of time between the first opportunity and the diagnosis. Finally, we identified risk factors for diagnostic delays using a logistic regression model. The number of SSD-related visits increased significantly in the 97 days prior to the histoplasmosis diagnosis. During this period, 97.4% of patients had a visit, and 90.1% had at least one SSD visit. We estimate that 82.9% of patients with histoplasmosis experienced at least one missed diagnostic opportunity. The average delay was 39.5 days with an average of 4.0 missed opportunities. Risk factors for diagnostic delays included prior antibiotic use, history of other pulmonary diseases, and emergency department and outpatient visits, especially during weekends. New diagnostic approaches for histoplasmosis are needed.

Achalasia is a rare disease with significant diagnostic delay and association with false diagnoses and unnecessary interventions. It remains unclear, whether atypical presentations, misinterpreted symptoms or inconclusive diagnostics are the cause. The aim of this study was the characterization of typical and atypical features of achalasia and their impact on delays, misinterpretations or false diagnoses. A retrospective analysis of prospective database over a period of 30 years was performed. Data about symptoms, delays and false diagnoses were obtained and correlated with manometric, endoscopic and radiologic findings. Totally, 300 patients with achalasia were included. Typical symptoms (dysphagia, regurgitation, weight loss and retrosternal pain) were present in 98.7%, 88%, 58.4% and 52.4%. The mean diagnostic delay was 4.7 years. Atypical symptoms were found in 61.7% and led to a delay of 6 months. Atypical gastrointestinal symptoms were common (43%), mostly 'heartburn' (16.3%), 'vomiting' (15.3%) or belching (7.7%). A single false diagnosis occurred in 26%, multiple in 16%. Major gastrointestinal misdiagnoses were GERD in 16.7% and eosinophilic esophagitis in 4%. Other false diagnosis affected ENT-, psychiatric, neurologic, cardiologic or thyroid diseases. Pitfalls were the description of 'heartburn' or 'nausea'. Tertiary contractions at barium swallows, hiatal hernias and 'reflux-like' changes at endoscopy or eosinophils in the biopsies were misleading. Atypical symptoms are common in achalasia, but they are not the sole source for diagnostic delays. Misleading descriptions of typical symptoms or misinterpretation of diagnostic studies contribute to false diagnoses and delays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Measures of diagnostic performance in cancer are underdeveloped. Electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs) to assess quality of cancer diagnosis could help quantify and improve diagnostic performance. Materials and Methods We developed 2 eCQMs to assess diagnostic evaluation of red-flag clinical findings for colorectal (CRC; based on abnormal stool-based cancer screening tests or labs suggestive of iron deficiency anemia) and lung (abnormal chest imaging) cancer. The 2 eCQMs quantified rates of red-flag follow-up in CRC and lung cancer using electronic health record data repositories at 2 large healthcare systems. Each measure used clinical data to identify abnormal results, evidence of appropriate follow-up, and exclusions that signified follow-up was unnecessary. Clinicians reviewed 100 positive and 20 negative randomly selected records for each eCQM at each site to validate accuracy and categorized missed opportunities related to system, provider, or patient factors. Results We implemented the CRC eCQM at both sites, while the lung cancer eCQM was only implemented at the VA due to lack of structured data indicating level of cancer suspicion on most chest imaging results at Geisinger. For the CRC eCQM, the rate of appropriate follow-up was 36.0% (26 746/74 314 patients) in the VA after removing clinical exclusions and 41.1% at Geisinger (1009/2461 patients; P  < .001). Similarly, the rate of appropriate evaluation for lung cancer in the VA was 61.5% (25 166/40 924 patients). Reviewers most frequently attributed missed opportunities at both sites to provider factors (84 of 157). Conclusions We implemented 2 eCQMs to evaluate the diagnostic process in cancer at 2 large health systems. Health care organizations can use these eCQMs to monitor diagnostic performance related to cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeWhile certain clinical factors suggest a diagnosis of dissociative seizures (DS), otherwise known as functional or psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), ictal video-electroencephalography monitoring (VEM) is the gold standard for diagnosis. Diagnostic delays were associated with worse quality of life and more seizures, even after treatment. To understand why diagnoses were delayed, we evaluated which factors were associated with delay to VEM.MethodsUsing data from 341 consecutive patients with VEM-documented dissociative seizures, we used multivariate log-normal regression with recursive feature elimination (RFE) and multiple imputation of some missing data to evaluate which of 76 clinical factors were associated with time from first dissociative seizure to VEM.ResultsThe mean delay to VEM was 8.4 years (median 3 years, IQR 1-10 years). In the RFE multivariate model, the factors associated with longer delay to VEM included more past antiseizure medications (0.19 log-years/medication, standard error (SE) 0.05), more medications for other medical conditions (0.06 log-years/medication, SE 0.03), history of physical abuse (0.75 log-years, SE 0.27), and more seizure types (0.36 log-years/type, SE 0.11). Factors associated with shorter delay included active employment or student status (-1.05 log-years, SE 0.21) and higher seizure frequency (0.14 log-years/log[seizure/month], SE 0.06).ConclusionsPatients with greater medical and seizure complexity had longer delays. Delays in multiple domains of healthcare can be common for victims of physical abuse. Unemployed and non-student patients may have had more barriers to access VEM. These results support earlier referral of complex cases to a comprehensive epilepsy center.

Objective: Failure to recognize symptoms of non‐human papillomavirus‐associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV(−)OPSCC) at presentation can delay diagnosis and treatment. We aim to identify patient factors and provider practice patterns that delay presentation and care in HPV(−)OPSCC. Methods: Retrospective review at a tertiary care center. Patients with HPV(−)OPSCC receiving treatment from 2006 to 2016. Patients were excluded if their date of symptom onset or diagnosis was unknown after thorough review of the electronic medical record or their tissue was not tested for HPV or p16. Clinical data, workup, and care timelines were abstracted. Univariate and multivariable linear regressions were performed to determine associations between patient and provider factors and delays in care. Results: Of 70 included patients, 52 (74%) were male and mean age was 60.5 (SD = 9.0). Median time to diagnosis was 69 days (IQR = 32–127 days), with a median latency of 30 days (IQR = 12–61 days) from symptom onset to first presentation and 19.5 days (IQR = 4–46 days) from the first presentation to diagnosis. Most patients visited at least 2 providers (n = 52, 74%) before diagnosis. Evaluation by 3 or more providers prior to diagnosis was associated with significant delays in diagnosis of nearly a year (357.7 days, p < 0.001) and being treated or prescribed analgesia prior to diagnosis was significantly associated with delays in diagnosis (p = 0.004) on univariate regression analysis. Conclusions: Delays in care related to evaluations by multiple providers and misdiagnosis prolonged time to diagnosis in HPV(−)OPSCC. Improved patient and provider education is necessary to expedite the diagnosis of HPV(−)OPSCC. Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:1394–1401, 2023 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: COVID-19 pandemic transformed the health system response worldwide. The aim of this study is to report changes about numbers and reason for ENT consultations in emergency department (ED) during COVID-19 pandemic comparing with those occurred the previous year (2019). Methods: Data about patients admitted to adult and pediatric ED were collected from March 1 to May 31, 2019 and 2020. Patients referred for urgency from general practitioners were excluded from the study. Results: Global ED admission (except for dyspnea or COVID-19–related symptoms) dramatically decreased during pandemic (−50.9% among adults and −71.4% among pediatrics). At the same time, ENT consultancy significantly reduced too, by 71.5% (P <.01) among adults and 45.1% (P <.01) for pediatrics. Among adults, it was reported a statistically significant decrease in consultation for ear problems (−88.5%, P =.0146). Reduction in ENT referral for bone fracture (−40%, P =.059), vertigo (−77.8%, P =.637), and tonsillitis (−87.5%, P =.688) was consistent, but not significant. Among pediatric patients, it was observed an increase by 25% about foreign bodies (12 vs 15, P <.01). A reduction in numbers of consults for ear problem (−90.8%; P =.045), epistaxis (−80%; P =.196), and nasal fracture (−70%; P =.36) was also observed. Conclusion: Fear of infection and the forced lock down caused a significant decrease in the number of ED accesses and in ENT consultancy. These data may suggest that some ED referral usually could be deferred, but on the other hand, pandemic will cause a great diagnostic delay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: People living in rural areas are less likely to survive cancer than those living in urban areas. There is evidence suggesting that poorer survival amongst rural cancer patients may be because these patients take longer to be diagnosed, particularly in the time between their symptoms beginning and them going to hospital to see a specialist. This study explored the experiences of people with symptoms of bowel cancer, in rural Northern England, to examine whether there were any common causes of 'delay' for these patients. Participants reported that their health beliefs and self-reliance, concerns about losing time at work, and having a poor relationship with their GP, could all influence whether they consulted the GP early about their symptoms. Having identified these unique barriers for rural patients, in relation to seeing the GP about bowel symptoms, we can develop ways to support earlier consultations with GPs, to improve the outcomes of rural patients who develop cancer. Rural cancer inequalities are evident internationally, with rural cancer patients 5% less likely to survive than their urban counterparts. There is evidence to suggest that diagnostic delays prior to entry into secondary care may be contributing to these poorer rural cancer outcomes. This study explores the symptom appraisal and help-seeking decision-making of people experiencing symptoms of colorectal cancer in rural areas of England. Patients were randomly invited from 4 rural practices, serving diverse communities. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 40 people who had experienced symptoms of colorectal cancer in the preceding 8 weeks. Four key themes were identified as influential in participants' willingness and timeliness of consultation: a desire to rule out cancer (facilitator of help-seeking); stoicism and self-reliance (barrier to help-seeking); time scarcity (barrier to help-seeking); and GP/patient relationship (barrier or facilitator, depending on perceived strength of the relationship). Self-employed, and "native" rural residents most commonly reported experiencing time scarcity and poor GP/patient relationships as a barrier to (re-)consultation. Targeted, active safety-netting approaches, and increased continuity of care, may be particularly beneficial to expedite timely diagnoses and minimise cancer inequalities for rural populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is predicted to have a net negative effect on tuberculosis control, with an estimated excess of 6.3 million tuberculosis cases and 1.4 million deaths by 2025. Programmatic issues such as the lockdown of tuberculosis services affect all patients, while biosocial factors have a differential impact on an individual’s risk for tuberculosis or adverse tuberculosis outcomes. Case presentation We report three Hispanic cases of incident tuberculosis (two males, 43 and 44 years old; one female, 49 years old) after resolution of coronavirus disease episodes. Coincidentally, all cases shared a common risk factor: a chronic history poorly controlled diabetes. Conclusions Our findings alert to the threat posed by the synergy between coronavirus disease and diabetes, on tuberculosis reactivation. In medium- to high-risk settings for tuberculosis, we recommend implementation of routine screening for latent tuberculosis infection in these cases, and preventive tuberculosis treatment in those who are positive.

Diagnostic delays are a major source of morbidity and mortality. Despite the adverse outcomes associated with diagnostic delays, few studies have examined the incidence and factors that influence diagnostic delays for different infectious diseases. The objective of this study was to understand the relative frequency of diagnostic delays for six infectious diseases commonly seen by infectious diseases (ID) consultants and to examine contributing factors for these delays. A 25-item survey to examine diagnostic delays in six infectious diseases was sent to all infectious diseases physicians in the Emerging Infections Network (EIN) who provide care to adult patients. Diseases included (1) tuberculosis, (2) non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections, (3) syphilis, (4) epidural abscess, (5) infective endocarditis, and (6) endemic fungal infections (e.g., histoplasmosis, blastomycosis). A total of 533 of 1,323 (40%) EIN members responded to the survey. Respondents perceived the diagnosis not being considered initially and the appropriate test not being ordered as the two most important contributors to diagnostic delays. Unusual clinical presentations and not consulting ID physicians early enough were also reported as a contributing factor to delays. Responses recorded in open-text fields also indicated errors related to testing as a likely cause of delays; specifically, test-related errors included ordering the wrong laboratory test, laboratory delays (specialized labs not available at the facility), and lab processing delays. Diagnostic delays commonly occur for the infectious diseases we considered. The contributing factors we identified are potential targets for future interventions to decrease diagnostic delays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Long diagnosis delay contributes significantly to the failure to eradicate tuberculosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the total, patient and system delays in diagnosis of pulmonary bacilliferous in the six tuberculosis Diagnostic and Treatment Centers in the five health districts of the central region in Burkina Faso. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 384 microscopy-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients in 2018 to address this objective. It concerned the socio-demographic, clinical, microbiological characteristics, and referral location/pathway characteristics of the patients. We then calculated the different delays. The "patient" (time from first symptoms to first consultation), "system" (time from first consultation to first diagnosis) and total (time from first symptoms to diagnosis) median diagnostic delay were estimated. Results: The median "total", "patient" and "system" diagnostic times were 37, 21 and 7 days, respectively. Of the 384 patients surveyed, 158 patients or 41.25% of patients had a long total diagnostic delay (> 45 days). The number of patients with a long system diagnostic delay was 125 patients (32.55%; p < 0.001) and those with a long patient diagnostic delay were 105 patients (27.34%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The total diagnosis delay of pulmonary tuberculosis was long for almost half of the patients. Awareness of the signs of tuberculosis among patients and caregivers, and consultation in a health center must be intensified to help considerably reduce these delays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is predicted to have a net negative effect on tuberculosis control, with an estimated excess of 6.3 million tuberculosis cases and 1.4 million deaths by 2025. Programmatic issues such as the lockdown of tuberculosis services affect all patients, while biosocial factors have a differential impact on an individual's risk for tuberculosis or adverse tuberculosis outcomes.Case Presentation: We report three Hispanic cases of incident tuberculosis (two males, 43 and 44 years old; one female, 49 years old) after resolution of coronavirus disease episodes. Coincidentally, all cases shared a common risk factor: a chronic history poorly controlled diabetes.Conclusions: Our findings alert to the threat posed by the synergy between coronavirus disease and diabetes, on tuberculosis reactivation. In medium- to high-risk settings for tuberculosis, we recommend implementation of routine screening for latent tuberculosis infection in these cases, and preventive tuberculosis treatment in those who are positive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) primarily affects young, working demographics, and impacts on work productivity. Here, we aimed to determine the delay in diagnosis of axSpA, assess the impact on work productivity, and explore patients' perception of available treatment options. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 axSpA patients who fulfilled the ASAS criteria. Ethical approval was obtained. Data regarding disease duration, delay in diagnosis, and other demographics were collected using an investigator-designed questionnaire. Disease activity, quality of life, and loss in work productivity were determined using standardized scales. Results: Median disease duration and delay in diagnosis were 5 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.0, 10.0) and 2 years (IQR: 0.5, 5.0), respectively. Median Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Function Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global, and Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life scores were 4.15, 3.00, 4.00, and 8.00 respectively. Three different specialists were visited by 58% of the patients before reaching a rheumatologist. An incorrect clinical impression was made in 69% of the patients before consultation with the rheumatologist. Median presenteeism and impact on work productivity reported were 20% and 20.34%, respectively. Eight percent of the patients had to cease employment due to debilitating consequences of axSpA. Daily activities were affected up to 40%. A misconception that “allopathic medications cause side effects in all axSpA patients” was held by 58% of the patients and 25% of the patients believed that doctors deliberately conceal side effects of medications. Conclusion: A patient referral pathway for axSpA should be established to avoid the visits to multiple specialists. AxSpA not only reduces work productivity but also leads to work disability. There is a need to address the patient's concerns regarding modern medicine so that their health-seeking behavior is improved.

Objective: Delays in the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) can increase the risk of transmission, thereby posing a significant risk to public health. Early diagnosis is considered to play a crucial role in eliminating TB. Rapid testing, active case finding, and health education are effective strategies for reducing tuberculosis diagnosis delays (TDDs). This study aimed to quantitatively compare the impact of reducing the TDD on incidence rates among student and non-student groups, thus exploring the efficacy of shortening the TDD for ending the TB epidemic and providing a reference for achieving the target incidence rate for ending TB., Methods: We used unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis and non-parametric tests to characterize the epidemiological characteristics of TDD. Additionally, a dynamic transmission model was used to quantify the impact of shortening the TDD on the incidence rates of TB among the two groups., Results: There was an initial increase in the TDD, followed by a decrease. Longer TDDs were observed in the northeastern region of China. Farmers, middle and high school students, middle-aged, elderly individuals and males exhibited relatively longer TDDs. A significant reduction in the incidence rate of PTB was observed when the TDD was decreased by 50 %. However, only reducing the TDD among non-students could achieve the goal of ending TB (i.e., achieving a minimum reduction of 63.00 %)., Conclusions: TDD remains a serious risk to public health, and non-students were shown to experience longer TDD. Shortening the TDD is crucial for reducing the incidence rates of TB, especially among non-students. It is essential to develop a highly sensitive and effective system for eliminating TB among non-students., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Tuberculosis(TB) and Diabetes comorbidity is an emerging public health problem in India. Delays in diagnosing TB or Diabetes would lead to adverse outcomes among comorbid patients, and attempts must be made to reduce these delays. Against this background, the study has been undertaken to clarify the role of sociocultural factors in determining diagnostic delays for TB and Diabetes among comorbid patients., Methods: A cross-sectional cultural epidemiological survey of the randomly selected 180 TB-Diabetes comorbid patients was carried out. The study examined sociocultural factors of delayed diagnosis of TB and Diabetes among urban and rural TB-Diabetes comorbid patients registered under TB-Diabetes collaborative activities under the National TB Elimination Programme (NTEP) in the Satara district of Maharashtra by using a semi-structured interview schedule. The patterns of distress (PDs) and perceived causes(PCs) of TB and Diabetes were compared with patients' and providers' diagnostic delays of TB and Diabetes based on prominence categories. In addition, the relationship between PDs and PCs as explanatory variables and TB and Diabetes diagnostic delays as outcome variables were assessed using stepwise multiple logistic regression., Results: Of the 180 TB-Diabetes comorbid patients, the proportion of men was higher, and they were 4.7 times more likely to get a delayed Diabetes diagnosis. Those who reported side effects of drugs and stigma reduced social status as the PDs were 2-3 times more likely to delay reaching TB facilities/providers (patients' diagnostic delay). Those who perceived inadequate diet and mental-emotional stress as the causes of TB were about three times more likely to reach the TB providers/facilities after two weeks. Also, those who perceived TB as a cause of punishment for prior deeds were two times more likely to reach TB facilities/providers after two weeks. Patients who reported fever and chest pain as the symptoms of TB were two times more likely to delay the diagnosis of TB. Patients who reported tobacco consumption, unhealthy lifestyles, thoughts, worries, tension, and germs or infection as perceived causes of TB were about two times more likely to be diagnosed after two weeks. Patients who reported excessive thirst as a diabetes symptom were about two times more likely to get delayed >2 weeks to reach diabetes facilities/providers. Patients who perceived environmental/occupational exposure as the cause of Diabetes were two times more likely to reach the diabetes facilities/providers after two weeks. Patients who reported excessive thirst and stroke as the physical problems of Diabetes were 3.2 and 9.6 times more likely to get delayed in the diagnosis of Diabetes (providers' diagnostic delay). Patients who perceived violation of taboo or misbehaviour as the perceived cause of Diabetes were 6.7 times more likely to get a delayed diagnosis of Diabetes., Conclusions: The sociocultural factors associated with TB and Diabetes diagnostic delays among comorbid patients are essential considerations in the evolving context of implementing TB-Diabetes collaborative activities. Therefore, acknowledging sociocultural factors concerning delayed diagnosis and minimising delays would strengthen joint TB-Diabetes collaborative activities under the National framework locally and nationally., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors have none to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Tuberculosis Association of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Cancer is a leading cause of death in Samoa, with cancer patients presenting late and experiencing poor outcomes. Barriers to early diagnosis are complex, and cultural factors play an important part. This qualitative study explored the barriers to cancer diagnosis in Samoa through semistructured interviews conducted with 19 Samoan patients. Thematic data analysis was informed by socioecological theory and yielded 4 themes: knowledge and beliefs about cancer; pain as a trigger for health care–seeking behavior; follow-up issues; and communication and trust. Cancer knowledge and attitudes toward pain were strongly influenced by culture and community beliefs. Lack of follow-up resulted in significant delays, and ineffective patient-doctor communication triggered feelings of uncertainty and mistrust in the health care system. Efforts to address knowledge gaps will not be effective unless they are accompanied by broader strategies addressing local health care capacity issues. Adopting a socioecological framework lens within a regional collaborative approach provides a way forward. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The diagnostic delays pose a huge challenge to human brucellosis (HB), which increases the risk of chronicity and complications with a heavy disease burden. This study aimed to quantify and identify the associated factors in the diagnostic delays to its prevention, reduction, and elimination. This study analyzed risk factors associated with the diagnostic delays in a cross-sectional study with data collected from Tongliao City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China. Diagnostic delays were defined with a cutoff of 30, 60, and 90 days. In different delay groups, risk factors of diagnostic delays were analyzed by univariate analysis and modeled by multivariate logistic regression analysis. A total of 14,506 cases were collected between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2017, of which the median diagnostic delays was 29 days [interquartile range (IQR): 14–54 days]. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the older age category was associated with longer diagnostic delays across all groups. Longer diagnostic delays increase with age among three delay groups (p for trend

Introduction: Diagnosis of Guillain Barre syndrome (GBS) is often made clinically. Certain patient and disease characteristics can cause delays in diagnosis and management.Methods: Observational retrospective study of forty-four patients diagnosed with GBS either clinically, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and/or by electro-diagnostic criteria at a teaching hospital (University of Missouri Hospital) in Columbia, Mid-Missouri between 2011 and 2017.Results: Patients with coexisting neurological conditions had statistically significant delay in diagnosis of GBS [Mean (SD); 13 ± 5 vs. 9.39 ± 4.7; p = 0.03]. Patients presenting with motor + symptoms (sensory and/or autonomic, in addition to motor), compared to those with only motor symptoms had statistically significant delay in diagnosis of GBS [Mean (SD); 11.90 ± 5 vs. 8.58 ± 4; p = 0.04].Discussion: Presence of co-existing neurological conditions, and motor + symptoms can delay timely diagnosis and management of GBS.

Aim: Decreased cancer incidence and reported changes to clinical management indicate that the COVID‐19 pandemic has delayed cancer diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to develop and apply a flexible model to estimate the impact of delayed diagnosis and treatment on survival outcomes and healthcare costs based on a shift in the disease stage at treatment initiation. Methods: A model was developed and made publicly available to estimate population‐level health economic outcomes by extrapolating and weighing stage‐specific outcomes by the distribution of stages at treatment initiation. It was applied to estimate the impact of 3‐ and 6‐month delays based on Australian data for stage I breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and lung cancer patients, and for T1 melanoma. Two approaches were explored to estimate stage shifts following a delay: (a) based on the relation between time to treatment initiation and overall survival (breast, colorectal, and lung cancer), and (b) based on the tumor growth rate (melanoma). Results: Using a conservative once‐off 3‐month delay and considering only shifts from stage I/T1 to stage II/T2, 88 excess deaths and $12 million excess healthcare costs were predicted in Australia over 5 years for all patients diagnosed in 2020. For a 6‐month delay, excess mortality and healthcare costs were 349 deaths and $46 million over 5 years. Conclusions: The health and economic impacts of delays in treatment initiation cause an imminent policy concern. More accurate individual patient data on shifts in stage of disease during and after the COVID‐19 pandemic are critical for further analyses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Diagnosis of Guillain Barre syndrome (GBS) is often made clinically. Certain patient and disease characteristics can cause delays in diagnosis and management. Methods: Observational retrospective study of forty-four patients diagnosed with GBS either clinically, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and/or by electro-diagnostic criteria at a teaching hospital (University of Missouri Hospital) in Columbia, Mid-Missouri between 2011 and 2017. Results: Patients with coexisting neurological conditions had statistically significant delay in diagnosis of GBS [Mean (SD); 13 ± 5 vs. 9.39 ± 4.7; p = 0.03]. Patients presenting with motor + symptoms (sensory and/or autonomic, in addition to motor), compared to those with only motor symptoms had statistically significant delay in diagnosis of GBS [Mean (SD); 11.90 ± 5 vs. 8.58 ± 4; p = 0.04]. Discussion: Presence of co-existing neurological conditions, and motor + symptoms can delay timely diagnosis and management of GBS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: While certain clinical factors suggest a diagnosis of dissociative seizures (DS), otherwise known as functional or psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), ictal video-electroencephalography monitoring (VEM) is the gold standard for diagnosis. Diagnostic delays were associated with worse quality of life and more seizures, even after treatment. To understand why diagnoses were delayed, we evaluated which factors were associated with delay to VEM.Methods: Using data from 341 consecutive patients with VEM-documented dissociative seizures, we used multivariate log-normal regression with recursive feature elimination (RFE) and multiple imputation of some missing data to evaluate which of 76 clinical factors were associated with time from first dissociative seizure to VEM.Results: The mean delay to VEM was 8.4 years (median 3 years, IQR 1-10 years). In the RFE multivariate model, the factors associated with longer delay to VEM included more past antiseizure medications (0.19 log-years/medication, standard error (SE) 0.05), more medications for other medical conditions (0.06 log-years/medication, SE 0.03), history of physical abuse (0.75 log-years, SE 0.27), and more seizure types (0.36 log-years/type, SE 0.11). Factors associated with shorter delay included active employment or student status (-1.05 log-years, SE 0.21) and higher seizure frequency (0.14 log-years/log[seizure/month], SE 0.06).Conclusions: Patients with greater medical and seizure complexity had longer delays. Delays in multiple domains of healthcare can be common for victims of physical abuse. Unemployed and non-student patients may have had more barriers to access VEM. These results support earlier referral of complex cases to a comprehensive epilepsy center. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Histoplasmosis is often confused with other diseases leading to diagnostic delays. We estimated the incidence, length of, and risk factors for, diagnostic delays associated with histoplasmosis. Using data from IBM Marketscan, 2001–2017, we found all patients with a histoplasmosis diagnosis. We calculated the number of visits that occurred prior to the histoplasmosis diagnosis and the number of visits with symptomatically similar diagnoses (SSDs). Next, we estimated the number of visits that represented a delay using a simulation-based approach. We also computed the number of potential opportunities for diagnosis that were missed for each patient and the length of time between the first opportunity and the diagnosis. Finally, we identified risk factors for diagnostic delays using a logistic regression model. The number of SSD-related visits increased significantly in the 97 days prior to the histoplasmosis diagnosis. During this period, 97.4% of patients had a visit, and 90.1% had at least one SSD visit. We estimate that 82.9% of patients with histoplasmosis experienced at least one missed diagnostic opportunity. The average delay was 39.5 days with an average of 4.0 missed opportunities. Risk factors for diagnostic delays included prior antibiotic use, history of other pulmonary diseases, and emergency department and outpatient visits, especially during weekends. New diagnostic approaches for histoplasmosis are needed.

Introduction: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is classified as one of the most challenging cancers to diagnose, and the hematological malignancy is associated with prolonged diagnostic delays. Although major steps have been made in the improvement of MM patient diagnosis and care, Romanian patients still face long diagnostic delays. Thus far, there have been no studies evaluating the factors associated with diagnostic errors in Romanian MM patients., Methods: Using the Aarhus statement, we prospectively determined the diagnostic intervals for 103 patients diagnosed with MM at Fundeni Clinical Institute, between January 2022 and March 2023., Results: Our data revealed that the main diagnostic delays are experienced during the "patient interval." Patients spend a median of 162 days from the first symptom onset until the first doctor appointment. Bone pain is the most frequently reported symptom by patients (78.64%), but it leads to a medical-seeking behavior in only half of the reporting patients and results in a median delay of 191 days. The changes in routine lab tests are considered most worrisome for patients, leading to a medical appointment after a median of only 25 days. The median primary care interval was 70 days, with patients having an average of 3.7 medical visits until MM suspicion was first raised. The secondary care interval did not contribute to the diagnostic delays., Discussion: Overall, the median diagnostic path for MM patients in Romania was more than 6 months, leading to a higher number of emergency presentations and myeloma-related end-organ damage., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Irimia, Badelita, Barbu, Cirlan, Zidaru and Coriu.)

Background: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) primarily affects young, working demographics, and impacts on work productivity. Here, we aimed to determine the delay in diagnosis of axSpA, assess the impact on work productivity, and explore patients' perception of available treatment options. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 axSpA patients who fulfilled the ASAS criteria. Ethical approval was obtained. Data regarding disease duration, delay in diagnosis, and other demographics were collected using an investigator-designed questionnaire. Disease activity, quality of life, and loss in work productivity were determined using standardized scales. Results: Median disease duration and delay in diagnosis were 5 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.0, 10.0) and 2 years (IQR: 0.5, 5.0), respectively. Median Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Function Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global, and Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life scores were 4.15, 3.00, 4.00, and 8.00 respectively. Three different specialists were visited by 58% of the patients before reaching a rheumatologist. An incorrect clinical impression was made in 69% of the patients before consultation with the rheumatologist. Median presenteeism and impact on work productivity reported were 20% and 20.34%, respectively. Eight percent of the patients had to cease employment due to debilitating consequences of axSpA. Daily activities were affected up to 40%. A misconception that "allopathic medications cause side effects in all axSpA patients" was held by 58% of the patients and 25% of the patients believed that doctors deliberately conceal side effects of medications. Conclusion: A patient referral pathway for axSpA should be established to avoid the visits to multiple specialists. AxSpA not only reduces work productivity but also leads to work disability. There is a need to address the patient's concerns regarding modern medicine so that their health-seeking behavior is improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 77-year-old African American female with rheumatoid arthritis presented with fever and unsteady gait. She was started on broad-spectrum antimicrobials due to CT evidence for sacroiliitis and psoas abscess and underwent partial excision of her sacroiliac bone and drainage of the abscess. One of four blood cultures grew Enterococcus faecalis and the patient was sent home with intravenous ampicillin for 6 weeks. Two days after antimicrobial completion, the patient presented with night sweats and weakness. Chest x-ray revealed new right upper lobe pulmonary infiltrates, and the AFB culture sent during her prior admission returned positive for TB. RIPE therapy with moxifloxacin was initiated. Although she responded well to treatment, she retained functional immobility. We report a case of musculoskeletal TB initially misdiagnosed as enterococcus sacroiliitis, resulting in a delayed initiation of anti-tuberculous therapy. A high index of suspicion and rapid detection with TB-PCR testing should be considered to avoid delayed diagnosis.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the pathways to obtaining a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) within the Mexican health system.Methods: Parents of children with ASD (N=186) were approached at specialized health centers and interviewed about the sequence of professionals they contacted that led to a diagnosis. The authors established the pathway to diagnosis, time of first parental concerns, time of first consultation, age of the child at diagnosis, and other measures. A Sankey plot was used to illustrate the complexity of the pathway to diagnosis. Diagnostic delays among children with autism were compared with delays among subsamples of children with Asperger's syndrome. Regression analysis was used to evaluate the effect of socioeconomic and clinical variables on diagnostic delays.Results: The median diagnostic delay was 27 months (interquartile range [IQR] 8-36), and three professional contacts (IQR 3-6) were needed to achieve a diagnosis. Patients switched between primary and tertiary care even in later stages of the pathway. Patients with Asperger's syndrome had longer delays than patients with autism, and girls and older patients took more time to receive a diagnosis. Parental concerns regarding language, developmental issues, and perceived developmental regression resulted in shorter diagnostic delays.Conclusions: Pathways to diagnosis of ASD are long and involve multiple contacts, with patients alternating between primary and specialized care. This pattern reflects failures in the diagnostic protocols and referral systems of clinical centers in Mexico, and such issues may be experienced in countries with similarly overwhelmed health care systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The aim was to explore patient experiences and views of their symptoms, delays in diagnosis, misdiagnoses and medical support, to identify common experiences, preferences and unmet needs. Methods Following a review of LUPUS UK's online forum, a questionnaire was posted online during December 2018. This was an exploratory mixed methods study, with qualitative data analysed thematically and combined with descriptive and statistically analysed quantitative data. Results There were 233 eligible respondents. The mean time to diagnosis from first experiencing symptoms was 6 years 11 months. Seventy-six per cent reported at least one misdiagnosis for symptoms subsequently attributed to their systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease. Mental health/non-organic misdiagnoses constituted 47% of reported misdiagnoses and were indicated to have reduced trust in physicians and to have changed future health-care-seeking behaviour. Perceptions of physician knowledge and listening skills were highly correlated with patient ratings of trust. The symptom burden was high. Fatigue had the greatest impact on activities of daily living, yet the majority reported receiving no support or poor support in managing it. Assessing and treating patients holistically and with empathy was strongly felt to increase diagnostic accuracy and improve medical relationships. Conclusion Patient responses indicated that timely diagnosis could be facilitated if physicians had greater knowledge of lupus/related systemic autoimmune diseases and were more amenable to listening to and believing patient reports of their symptoms. Patient priorities included physicians viewing them holistically, with more emotional support and assistance in improving quality of life, especially in relation to fatigue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective : The objective of this study was to determine the length of delay in diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic diseases, and to indicate the main factors responsible for such delays. Material and methods : A retrospective multi-centre questionnaire survey carried out among 197 patients with diagnosed inflammatory rheumatic diseases or undergoing the diagnostic process. Results : The most common early symptoms of inflammatory rheumatic disease included joint pain (94%), joint swelling (78%), morning joint stiffness (77%), fatigue (76%), and sleep disturbed by joint pain (74%). When asked about the reasons for seeking medical help, most patients indicated intensification of the symptoms (89%) and the fact that the symptoms made them unable to perform daily activities or work (86%). Limited access to specialists (70%) and the conviction that the symptoms will resolve spontaneously (57%) had the biggest impact on delaying a visit to a doctor. Before visiting a rheumatologist, the patients consulted their symptoms with their general practitioners (GPs, 95%), orthopaedicians (43%), and neurologists (29%). Almost half of the patients (48%) consulted their symptoms with at least 2 non-rheumatologists, whereas as many as 21% of patients visited 4 or more specialists. After the onset of symptoms of rheumatic disease, 28% of patients delayed seeing any doctor for 4 months or longer. 36% of patients waited 4 months or longer for a referral to a rheumatologist. The great majority of the patients (85%) made an appointment with a rheumatologist within a month of receiving a referral. 25% of patients waited 4 months or longer to see a rheumatologist. Conclusions : Diagnostic delays result from both the level of patients’ awareness (ignoring early symptoms) and improper functioning of the health care system. In the case of the health care system, the source of delays is not only “queues to rheumatologists”, but also referring patients to non-rheumatologists.

Abstract Background Children and families living with rare disease often experience significant health, psychosocial, economic burdens and diagnostic delays. Experiences appear to be constant, regardless of the specific rare disease diagnosis. Systematically collected Australian data to support policy response on rare diseases are scarce. We address this gap by providing survey results about 462 children aged

Copyright of Medicina (Buenos Aires) is the property of Medicina (Buenos Aires) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose We previously developed electronic triggers to automatically flag records for patients experiencing potential delays in diagnostic evaluation for certain cancers. Because of the unique clinical, logistic, and legal aspects of mammography, this study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a trigger to flag delayed follow-up on mammography. Methods An algorithm was developed to detect delays in follow-up of abnormal mammographic results (>60 days for BI-RADS ® 0, 4, and 5 and >7 months for BI-RADS 3) using clinical data in the electronic health record. Flagged records were then manually reviewed to determine the trigger’s performance characteristics (positive and negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity). The frequency of delays and patient communication related to abnormal results, reasons for lack of follow-up, and whether patients were subsequently diagnosed with breast cancer were also assessed. Results Of 365,686 patients seen between January 1, 2010, and May 31, 2015, the trigger identified 2,129 patients with abnormal findings on mammography, of whom it flagged 552 as having delays in follow-up. From these, review of 400 randomly selected records revealed 283 true delays (positive predictive value, 71%; 95% confidence interval, 66%-75%), including 280 records without any documented plan and three patients with plans that were not adhered to. Transcription and reporting inconsistencies were identified in 27% of externally performed mammographic reports. Only 335 records (84%) contained specific documentation that the patient was informed of the abnormal result. Conclusions Care delays appear to continue despite federal laws requiring patient notification of mammographic results within 30 days. Clinical application of mammography-related triggers could help detect these delays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: With this study, we set out to identify missed opportunities in diagnosis of spinal epidural abscesses to outline areas for process improvement.Methods: Using a large national clinical data repository, we identified all patients with a new diagnosis of spinal epidural abscess in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) during 2013. Two physicians independently conducted retrospective chart reviews on 250 randomly selected patients and evaluated their records for red flags (eg, unexplained weight loss, neurological deficits, and fever) 90 days prior to diagnosis. Diagnostic errors were defined as missed opportunities to evaluate red flags in a timely or appropriate manner. Reviewers gathered information about process breakdowns related to patient factors, the patient-provider encounter, test performance and interpretation, test follow-up and tracking, and the referral process. Reviewers also determined harm and time lag between red flags and definitive diagnoses.Results: Of 250 patients, 119 had a new diagnosis of spinal epidural abscess, 66 (55.5%) of which experienced diagnostic error. Median time to diagnosis in error cases was 12 days, compared with 4 days in cases without error (P <.01). Red flags that were frequently not evaluated in error cases included unexplained fever (n = 57; 86.4%), focal neurological deficits with progressive or disabling symptoms (n = 54; 81.8%), and active infection (n = 54; 81.8%). Most errors involved breakdowns during the patient-provider encounter (n = 60; 90.1%), including failures in information gathering/integration, and were associated with temporary harm (n = 43; 65.2%).Conclusion: Despite wide availability of clinical data, errors in diagnosis of spinal epidural abscesses are common and involve inadequate history, physical examination, and test ordering. Solutions should include renewed attention to basic clinical skills. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the length of delay in diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic diseases, and to indicate the main factors responsible for such delays. Material and methods: A retrospective multi-centre questionnaire survey carried out among 197 patients with diagnosed inflammatory rheumatic diseases or undergoing the diagnostic process. Results: The most common early symptoms of inflammatory rheumatic disease included joint pain (94%), joint swelling (78%), morning joint stiffness (77%), fatigue (76%), and sleep disturbed by joint pain (74%). When asked about the reasons for seeking medical help, most patients indicated intensification of the symptoms (89%) and the fact that the symptoms made them unable to perform daily activities or work (86%). Limited access to specialists (70%) and the conviction that the symptoms will resolve spontaneously (57%) had the biggest impact on delaying a visit to a doctor. Before visiting a rheumatologist, the patients consulted their symptoms with their general practitioners (GPs, 95%), orthopaedicians (43%), and neurologists (29%). Almost half of the patients (48%) consulted their symptoms with at least 2 non-rheumatologists, whereas as many as 21% of patients visited 4 or more specialists. After the onset of symptoms of rheumatic disease, 28% of patients delayed seeing any doctor for 4 months or longer. 36% of patients waited 4 months or longer for a referral to a rheumatologist. The great majority of the patients (85%) made an appointment with a rheumatologist within a month of receiving a referral. 25% of patients waited 4 months or longer to see a rheumatologist. Conclusions: Diagnostic delays result from both the level of patients' awareness (ignoring early symptoms) and improper functioning of the health care system. In the case of the health care system, the source of delays is not only "queues to rheumatologists", but also referring patients to non-rheumatologists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Children and families living with rare disease often experience significant health, psychosocial, economic burdens and diagnostic delays. Experiences appear to be constant, regardless of the specific rare disease diagnosis. Systematically collected Australian data to support policy response on rare diseases are scarce. We address this gap by providing survey results about 462 children aged <19 years living with approximately 200 different rare diseases.Results: Of 462 children, 96% were born in Australia, 55% were male, median age was 8.9 years (0-18.2). Four-hundred-and-twenty-eight (93%) had received a definitive diagnosis but 29 (7%) remained undiagnosed. Before receiving the correct diagnosis 38% consulted ≥ 6 different doctors. Among those with a diagnosis, 37% believed the diagnosis was delayed and 27% initially received a wrong diagnosis. Consequences of delayed diagnosis include anxiety, loss of reproductive confidence because of an ill-defined genetic risk, frustration and stress (54%), disease progression (37%), delays in treatment (25%) and inappropriate treatments (10%). Perceived reasons for diagnostic delays included lack of knowledge about the disease among health professionals (69.2%), lack of symptom awareness by the family (21.2%) and difficulties accessing tests (17.9%). Children with inborn errors of metabolism were less likely to have a delayed diagnosis compared with other disease groups (Chi-Sq = 17.1; P < 0.0001), most likely due to well-established and accessible biochemical screening processes. Diagnosis was given in person in 74% of cases, telephone in 18.5% and via a letter in 3.5%. Some families (16%) were dissatisfied with the way the diagnosis was delivered, citing lack of empathy and lack of information from health professionals. Psychological support at diagnosis was provided to 47.5%, but 86.2% believed that it should always be provided. Although 74.9% of parents believed that the diagnosis could have an impact on future family planning, only 44.8% received genetic counselling.Conclusion: Parents of children living with rare chronic and complex diseases have called for better education, resourcing of health professionals to prevent avoidable diagnostic delays, and to facilitate access to early interventions and treatments. Access to psychological support and genetic counselling should be available to all parents receiving a life-changing diagnosis for their child. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Missed colonoscopy appointments (no-shows) can lead to wasted resources and delays in colorectal cancer diagnosis, an area of special concern in public health systems that often provide care for vulnerable patients. Our objective was to identify reasons for missed colonoscopy appointments in patients seeking care at two large public health systems in Houston, TX.Methods: We conducted a telephone survey of patients who missed their colonoscopy appointments at two tertiary care health systems. Using a structured survey instrument, we collected information on patient-specific and health services barriers. Patient-specific barriers included perceived procedural-related factors (e.g., difficulty in preparation), cognitive-emotional factors (e.g., fear or concern about modesty), and changes in health status (e.g., improvement or worsening of health). Health services barriers included logistical factors (e.g., travel-related difficulties) and appointment scheduling problems (inconvenient date or time). We examined differences in attributions for missed appointments between the two study sites.Results: Of 160 unique patients (102 Site A and 58 Site B) who missed their appointment during the study period, 153 (95.6 %) attributed their no-show to at least one of the listed barriers. Most respondents (125; 78.1 %) cited travel-related issues or scheduling problems as reasons for their missed appointment. Not having a ride or a travel companion was the most commonly reported travel-related issue. We also found significant differences for barriers between the two sites.Conclusions: Most missed colonoscopy appointments resulted from potentially preventable travel- and scheduling-related issues. Because barriers to keeping colonoscopy appointments are different across health systems, each health system might need to develop unique interventions to reduce missed colonoscopy appointments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]