Search

Your search keyword '"Diarra, Aissa"' showing total 11 results
Start Over Author "Diarra, Aissa"
11 results on '"Diarra, Aissa"'

1. Interventions for adolescent mental, sexual and reproductive health in West Africa: A scoping review

Author

Agyepong, Irene A., Agblevor, Emelia, Odopey, Selase, Addom, Selasie, Enyimayew Afun, Nana Efua, Agyekum, Mary Pomaa, Asante, Paapa Yaw, Aye, Grace Emmanuelle, Darko, Natasha, Diarra, Aïssa, Fenny, Ama Pokuaa, Gladzah, Annick, Ibrahim, Nassirou, Kagambega, Aline, Wallace, Lauren J., Novignon, Jacob, Yaogo, Maurice, Borgès Da Sliva, Roxane, Ensor, Tim, and Mirzoev, Tolib

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Factors influencing primary care access, utilisation and quality of management for patients living with hypertension in West Africa: a scoping review protocol

Author

Amarteyfio, Kezia Naa Amerley Akosua, primary, Bondzie, Eugene Paa Kofi, additional, Reichenberger, Veronika, additional, Agyepong, Irene Akua, additional, Ansah, Evelyn K, additional, Diarra, Aissa, additional, Mirzoev, Tolib, additional, Perel, Pablo, additional, Yaogo, Maurice, additional, and Antwi, Edward, additional

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

10. Action to protect the independence and integrity of global health research

Author

Storeng, Katerini T., Abimbola, Seye, Balabanova, Dina, Mccoy, David, Ridde, Valery, Filippi, Veronique, Roalkvam, Sidsel, Akello, Grace, Parker, Melissa, Palmer, Jennifer, Abejirinde, Ibukun, Adebiyi, Babatope, Affun-Adegbulu, Clara, Ahlgren, Jhon Alvarez, Ahmad, Ayesha, Al-Awlaqi, Sameh, Aloys, Zongo, Amul, Gianna Gayle, Arthur, Joshua, Asaduzzaman, Muhammad, Asgedom, Akeza Awealom, Assarag, Bouchra, Atchessi, Nicole, Atkins, Salla, Badejo, Okikiolu, Baeroe, Kristine, Molleh, Bailah, Bazzano, Alessandra, Behague, Dominique P., Beisel, Uli, Belaid, Loubna, Bernays, Sarah, Bhuiyan, Shafi, Biermann, Olivia, Birungi, Harriet, Blanchet, Karl, Blystad, Astrid, Bodson, Oriane, Bonnet, Emmanuel, Bose, Shibaji, Bozorgmehr, Kayvan, Brear, Michelle, Burgess, Rochelle, Byskov, Jens, Carillon, Severine, Cavallaro, Francesca L., Chabeda, Sophie, Chandler, Clare, Chapman, Rachel, Chikuse, Francis F., Chinwe, Juliana Iwu, Cislaghi, Beniamino, Closser, Svea, Colvin, Christopher J., Cresswell, Jenny, da Cunha Saddi, Fabiana, Daire, Judith, Dalglish, Sarah, de Brouwere, Vincent, de Sardan, Jean-Pierre Olivier, Delvaux, Therese, Desgrees du Lou, Annabel, Diallo, Brahima A., Diarra, Aissa, Dixon, Justin, Doherty, Tanya, Dumont, Alexandre, Eboreime, Ejemai, Engelbrecht, Beth, Erikson, Susan, Faye, Adama, Fischer, Sara, Fournet, Florence, Fox, Ashley M., Francis, Joel Msafiri, Gautier, Lara, George, Asha, Gilson, Lucy, Gimbel, Sarah, Glenn, Jeff, Gopinathan, Unni, Gordeev, Vladimir S., Gradmann, Christoph, Graham, Janice E., Gram, Lu, Greco, Giulia, Grepin, Karen, Guichard, Anne, Gupta, Pragya Tiwari, Guzman, Viveka, Haaland, Marte E. S., Haggblom, Anna, Hagopian, Amy, Hammarberg, Karin, Handschumacher, Pascal, Hann, Katrina, Hasselberg, Marie, Hawkes, Sarah, Howard, Natasha, Hurtig, Anna-Karin, Hussain, Sameera, Hutchinson, Eleanor, Idoteyin, Ezirim, Infanti, Jennifer J., Irwin, Rachel, Islam, Shariful, Joarder, Taufique, John, Preethi, Johnson, Ermel, Johri, Mira, Justice, Judith, Kabore, Charles, Kadio, Kadidiatou, Kamwa, Matthieu, Kelly, Ann H., Kenworthy, Nora, Kittelsen, Sonja, Kloster, Maren Olene, Kocsis, Emily, Koon, Adam, Kumar, Pratap, Lal, Arush, Lange, Isabelle, Lanthorn, Heather, Lees, Shelley, Lexchin, Joel, Lie, Ann Louise, Limenih, Gojjam, Litwin-Davies, Isabel, Lodda, Charles Clarke, Lonnroth, Knut, Manton, John, Manzi, Anatole, Manzoor, Mehr, Marchal, Bruno, Marten, Robert, Matsui, Mitsuaki, Mbewe, Allan, Mc Sween-Cadieux, Esther, McGoey, Linsey, McNeill, Desmond, Mendenhall, Emily, Mendez, Claudio A., Mirzoev, Tolib, Mohammed, Shafiu, Moland, Karen Marie, Molyneux, Sassy, Mumtaz, Zubia, Murray, Susan Fairley, Nambiar, Devaki, Nelson, Erica, Nieto-Sanchez, Claudia, Norheim, Ole Frithjof, Nouvet, Elysee, Obare, Francis, Okungu, Vincent, Onarheim, Kristine Husoy, Ostebo, Marit Tolo, Ouattara, Fatoumata, Ozawa, Sachiko, Pai, Madhukar, Paina, Ligia, Parashar, Rakesh, Paul, Elisabeth, Peeters, Koen, Pennetier, Cedric, Penn-Kekana, Loveday, Peters, David, Pfeiffer, James, Pot, Hanneke, Prashanth, N. S., Preston, Robyn, Puyvallee, Antoine de Bengy, Rahmalia, Annisa, Reid-Henry, Simon, Rodriguez, Daniela C., Ronse, Maya, Sacks, Emma, Samb, Oumar Malle, Sanders, David, Sarkar, Nandini, Sarriot, Eric, Scheel, Inger Brummenaes, Schwarz, Thomas, Scott, Kerry, Seeley, Janet, Seward, Nadine, Shannon, Geordan, Shearer, Jessica, Shelley, Katharine, Sherr, Kenneth, Shiffman, Jeremey, Simard, Frederic, Singh, Neha S., Soors, Werner, Springer, Rusla Anne, Strong, Adrienne, Sundby, Johanne, Taylor, Stephen, Tetui, Moses, Topp, Stephanie M., Tsofa, Benjamin, Turcotte-Tremblay, Anne-Marie, Undie, Chi-Chi, Van Belle, Sara, Van Heteren, Godelieve, van Rensburg, Andre Janse, Sriram, Veena, Venkatapuram, Sridhar, Wagenaar, Bradley H., Wallace, Lauren, Walugembe, David R., Wariri, Oghenebrume, Whiteside, Alan O. B. E., Yakob, Bereket, Zakayo, Scholastica, Zitti, Tony, Zwi, Anthony, Centre population et développement (CEPED - UMR_D 196), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5), and Signatories

Subjects
Project commissioning, media_common.quotation_subject, environmental health, Commission, Public administration, 03 medical and health sciences, Politics, 0302 clinical medicine, Political science, Agency (sociology), Global health, 030212 general & internal medicine, media_common, 030503 health policy & services, Health Policy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Censorship, 16. Peace & justice, 3. Good health, Negotiation, Editorial, [SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie, Human medicine, 0305 other medical science, International development
Abstract

In a recent Viewpoint in the Lancet , some of us shared our experience of censorship in donor-funded evaluation research and warned about a potential trend in which donors and their implementing partners use ethical and methodological arguments to undermine research.1 Reactions to the Viewpoint—and lively debate at the 2018 Global Symposium on Health Systems Research —suggest that similar experiences are common in implementation and policy research commissioned by international donors to study and evaluate large-scale, donor-funded health interventions and programmes, which are primarily implemented in low resource settings. ‘We all have the same stories’, was one of the first comments on the Viewpoint, followed by many private messages divulging instances of personal and institutional pressure, intimidation and censorship following attempts to disseminate unwanted findings. Such pressure comes from major donors and from international non-governmental organisations (NGOs) obliged to have an external assessment but who then maintain a high degree of confidentiality and control. That such experiences are widespread reflects the deeply political nature of the field of ‘global health’ and the interconnections between priority setting, policy making and project implementation, which sit within a broader set of deeply entrenched power structures.2 3 Researchers in this field routinely find themselves working within—and studying—complex power relations and so experience challenges in negotiating their own position between interests of commissioning agencies and funders, implementers and country governments, as well as those of their own research institutions and their partnerships with other researchers spanning high-income, middle-income and low-income countries.4–7 They often receive research funding from major donor agencies like the UK Department of International Development (DFID), the US Agency for International Development (USAID), the Agence Francaise de Developpement (AFD), UNITAID and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,8 who commission evaluations for their own funded projects, even though they have …

Published
2018

11. A process evaluation of user fees abolition for pregnant women and children under five years in two districts in Niger (West Africa)

Author

Ridde Valéry and Diarra Aissa

Subjects
Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
Abstract

Abstract Background African policy-makers are increasingly considering abolishing user fees as a solution to improve access to health care systems. There is little evidence on this subject in West Africa, and particularly in countries that have organized their healthcare system on the basis of the Bamako Initiative. This article presents a process evaluation of an NGO intervention to abolish user fees in Niger for children under five years and pregnant women. Methods The intervention was launched in 2006 in two health districts and 43 health centres. The intervention consisted of abolishing user fees and improving the quality of services (drugs, ambulance, etc.). We carried out a process evaluation in April 2007 using qualitative and quantitative data. Three data collection methods were used: i) individual in-depth interviews (n = 85) and focus groups (n = 8); ii) participant observation in 12 health centres; and iii) self-administered structured questionnaires (n = 51 health staff). Results The population favoured abolition; health officials and local decision-makers were in favour, but they worried about its sustainability. Among health workers, opposition to providing free services was more widespread. The strengths of the process were: a top-down phase of information and raising community awareness; appropriate incentive measures; a good drug supply system; and the organization of a medical evacuation system. The major weaknesses of the process were: the perverse effects of incentive bonuses; the lack of community-based management committees' involvement in the management; the creation of a system running in parallel with the BI system; the lack of action to support the service offer; and the poor coordination of the availability of free services at different levels of the health pyramid. Some unintended outcomes are also documented. Conclusion The linkages between systems in which some patients pay (Bamako Initiative) and some do not should be carefully considered and organized in accordance with the local reality. For the poorest patients to really benefit, it is essential that, at the same time, the quality of services be improved and mechanisms be put in place to prevent abuses. Much remains to be done to generate knowledge on the processes for abolishing fees in West Africa.

Published
2009
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results