Search

The feasibility of freezing and thawing ovarian tissue is nowadays widely documented. However, ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) is happening at a much slower pace and clinical experience is somewhat limited. In this review, five European centers present their collective experience of transplanting ovarian tissue in 285 women. The focus is on surgical techniques and OTT outcomes, reproductive outcomes, the impact of chemotherapy before ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC), the risk of relapse, and endocrine resumption and longevity of transplanted tissue. The risk of relapse due to reimplantation of ovarian tissue appears to be very low based on current data. Endocrine function recovery is seen in almost all transplanted women and around one in four gives birth to a healthy child. The efficacy of IVF in these patients is not very high, however, and needs to be substantially improved. Radiation to the pelvis, particularly using relatively high doses, appears to considerably decrease the likelihood of a successful pregnancy and may constitute a contraindication. Our results demonstrate that chemotherapy before OTC does not impair the chances of success, depending, of course, on the total dose and type of chemotherapy administered before OTC. At this early stage of development of OTT for fertility restoration, the results are encouraging and demonstrate clear potential. However, the method is far from being fully developed and requires continued research efforts to optimize our approach.

The feasibility of freezing and thawing ovarian tissue is nowadays widely documented. However, ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) is happening at a much slower pace, and clinical experience is somewhat limited. In this review, five European centers present their collective experience of transplanting ovarian tissue in 285 women. The focus is on surgical techniques and OTT outcomes, reproductive outcomes, the impact of chemotherapy before ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC), the risk of relapse, and endocrine resumption and longevity of transplanted tissue. The risk of relapse due to reimplantation of ovarian tissue appears to be very low according to current data. Recovery of endocrine function is seen in almost all women undergoing transplantation of ovarian tissue, and about one in four gives birth to a healthy child. The efficacy of in vitro fertilization in these patients is not very high, however, and needs to be substantially improved. Radiation to the pelvis, especially with relatively high doses, appears to considerably decrease the likelihood of a successful pregnancy and may be contraindicated. Our results demonstrate that chemotherapy before OTC does not impair the chances of success, depending, of course, on the total dose and type of chemotherapy administered. At this early stage of development of OTT for restoration of fertility, the results are encouraging and demonstrate clear potential. However, the method is far from being fully developed and requires continued research efforts to optimize our approach.

PURPOSE: Cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplant restores ovarian function in young cancer patients after gonadotoxic treatment. However, leukemia is associated with increased risk of malignant cell transmission. We aimed to assess the tumor-inducing potential of two different leukemic cell lines when xenografted to immunodeficient mice. METHODS: Fifty-four female immunodeficient mice were grafted with either 100, 200, 500, 1000, and 10,000 chronic myeloid leukemia in blast crisis (BV-173) cells or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (RCH-ACV) cells, embedded inside a fibrin scaffold along with 50,000 human ovarian stromal cells. Two mice per cell line received the fibrin matrix without leukemic cells as negative controls. Clinical signs of disease were monitored for 20 weeks. Grafts, liver tissue, and masses were collected for macroscopic analysis and gene expression of BCR-ABL1 and E2A-PBX fusion transcripts present in BV-173 and RCH-ACV respectively. RESULTS: BV-173 cells: Mice grafted with 100, 200, or 500 cells showed no sign of disease after and were negative for BCR-ABL1 expression. Three of the 5 animals grafted with 1000 cells and all mice with 10,000 cells developed disease and showed BCR-ABL1-positive expression. RCH-ACV cells: Two out of 4 mice grafted with 100 cells developed disease and were E2A-PBX1-positive. All the animals grafted with higher cell doses showed signs of disease and all but one were E2A-PBX1-positive. CONCLUSION: The present work proves that the disease-inducing potential of BV-173 and RCH-ACV leukemic cells xenografted to SCID mouse peritoneum differs between cell lines, depending on cell number, type, status, and cytogenetic disease profile when ovarian tissue is harvested.

The feasibility of freezing and thawing ovarian tissue is nowadays widely documented. However, ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) is happening at a much slower pace, and clinical experience is somewhat limited. In this review, five European centers present their collective experience of transplanting ovarian tissue in 285 women. The focus is on surgical techniques and OTT outcomes, reproductive outcomes, the impact of chemotherapy before ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC), the risk of relapse, and endocrine resumption and longevity of transplanted tissue. The risk of relapse due to reimplantation of ovarian tissue appears to be very low according to current data. Recovery of endocrine function is seen in almost all women undergoing transplantation of ovarian tissue, and about one in four gives birth to a healthy child. The efficacy of in vitro fertilization in these patients is not very high, however, and needs to be substantially improved. Radiation to the pelvis, especially with relatively high doses, appears to considerably decrease the likelihood of a successful pregnancy and may be contraindicated. Our results demonstrate that chemotherapy before OTC does not impair the chances of success, depending, of course, on the total dose and type of chemotherapy administered. At this early stage of development of OTT for restoration of fertility, the results are encouraging and demonstrate clear potential. However, the method is far from being fully developed and requires continued research efforts to optimize our approach.

PurposeOncofertility focuses on providing fertility and endocrine-sparing options to patients who undergo life-preserving but gonadotoxic cancer treatment. The resources needed to meet patient demand often are fragmented along disciplinary lines. We quantify assets and gaps in oncofertility care on a global scale.MethodsSurvey-based questionnaires were provided to 191 members of the Oncofertility Consortium Global Partners Network, a National Institutes of Health-funded organization. Responses were analyzed to measure trends and regional subtleties about patient oncofertility experiences and to analyze barriers to care at sites that provide oncofertility services.ResultsSixty-three responses were received (response rate, 25%), and 40 were analyzed from oncofertility centers in 28 countries. Thirty of 40 survey results (75%) showed that formal referral processes and psychological care are provided to patients at the majority of sites. Fourteen of 23 respondents (61%) stated that some fertility preservation services are not offered because of cultural and legal barriers. The growth of oncofertility and its capacity to improve the lives of cancer survivors around the globe relies on concentrated efforts to increase awareness, promote collaboration, share best practices, and advocate for research funding.ConclusionThis survey reveals global and regional successes and challenges and provides insight into what is needed to advance the field and make the discussion of fertility preservation and endocrine health a standard component of the cancer treatment plan. As the field of oncofertility continues to develop around the globe, regular assessment of both international and regional barriers to quality care must continue to guide process improvements. (c) 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Purpose: In the accompanying article, "Survey of Fertility Preservation Options Available to Patients With Cancer Around the Globe," we showed that specific fertility preservation services may not be offered at various sites around the world because of cultural and legal barriers. We assessed global and regional experiences as well as the legal status of third-party reproduction and adoption to serve as a comprehensive international data set and resource for groups that wish to begin oncofertility interventions.Methods: We provide data on the legalities of third-party assisted reproductive technologies and other family-building options in the 28 oncofertility-practicing countries surveyed.Results: We found regional and country differences that will be important in the development of tailored resources for physicians and for patient brochures that are sensitive to these local restrictions and cultural norms.Conclusion: Because many patients first consult Web-based materials, the formal assessment of the availability of these options provides members of the global oncofertility community with data to which they might otherwise not have ready access to better serve their patients.