Search

Purpose: To reveal the penetration of epinastine, an anti-allergic ophthalmic agent, into the eyelid and its distribution to the conjunctiva after administration of a cream formulation on rabbit eyelid skin., Study Design: Experimental study., Methods: Rabbits were treated with 0.5% epinastine cream on hair-shaved eyelids, followed by preparation of eyelid tissue slices to determine spatial tissue distribution of epinastine by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) quantification using laser-microdissected tissues and desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging (DESI-MSI). In addition, following either eyelid application of 0.5% epinastine cream or ocular instillation of 0.1% epinastine eye drops, concentration-time profiles of epinastine in the palpebral conjunctiva and bulbar conjunctiva were determined using LC-MS/MS., Results: Laser microdissection coupled with LC-MS/MS analysis detected high concentrations of epinastine around the outermost layer of the eyelid at 0.5 h post-administration that gradually diffused deeper into the eyelid and was distributed in the conjunctival layer at 8 and 24 h post-administration. Similar time-dependent drug distribution was observed in high-spatial-resolution images obtained using DESI-MSI. Epinastine concentrations in the conjunctival tissues peaked at 4-8 h after administration of 0.5% epinastine cream and then decreased slowly over 72 h post-administration. In contrast, epinastine concentrations peaked quickly and decreased sharply after epinastine eye drop administration., Conclusion: After the application of epinastine cream to the eyelid skin, epinastine gradually permeated the eyelid. The compound was retained in the conjunctiva for 8-24 h post-administration, indicating that epinastine cream is a promising long-acting formulation for treating allergic conjunctivitis., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Eslicarbazepine acetate is a third-generation anti-epileptic prodrug quickly and extensively transformed to eslicarbazepine after oral administration. Reduction in seizure frequency in patients managed with eslicarbazepine is only partial in the majority of patients and many of them suffer considerable ADRs that require a change of treatment. The P-glycoprotein, encoded by the ABCB1 gene, is expressed throughout the body and can impact the pharmacokinetics of several drugs. In terms of epilepsy treatment, this transporter was linked to drug-resistant epilepsy, as it conditions drug access into the brain due to its expression at the blood-brain barrier. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of three ABCB1 common polymorphisms (i.e., C3435T, or rs1045642, G2677A or rs2032582 and C1236T or rs1128503) in the pharmacokinetics and safety of eslicarbazepine. For this purpose, 22 healthy volunteers participating in a bioequivalence clinical trial were recruited. No significant relationship was observed between sex, race and ABCB1 polymorphism and eslicarbazepine pharmacokinetic variability. In contrast, ABCB1 C1236T C/C diplotype was significantly related to the occurrence of ADRs: one volunteer with this genotype suffered dizziness, somnolence and hand paresthesia, while no other volunteer suffered any of these ADRs (p < 0.045). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study published to date evaluating eslicarbazepine pharmacogenetics. Further studies with large sample sizes are needed to compare the results obtained here., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

The safety of switching between generic products of antiseizure medications (ASMs) continues to be a hot topic in epilepsy management. The main reason for concern relates to the uncertainty on whether, and when, two generics found to be bioequivalent to the same brand (reference) product are bioequivalent to each other, and the risk of a switch between generics resulting in clinically significant changes in plasma ASM concentrations. This article addresses these concerns by discussing the distinction between bioequivalence and statistical testing for significant difference, the importance of intra-subject variability in interpreting bioequivalence studies, the stricter regulatory bioequivalence requirements applicable to narrow-therapeutic-index (NTI) drugs, and the extent by which currently available generic products of ASMs comply with such criteria. Data for 117 oral generic products of second-generation ASMs approved in Europe by the centralized, mutual recognition or decentralized procedure were analyzed based on a review of publicly accessible regulatory assessment reports. The analysis showed that for 99% of generic products assessed (after exclusion of gabapentin products), the 90% confidence intervals (90% CIs) of geometric mean ratios (test/reference) for AUC (area under the drug concentration vs time curve) were narrow and wholly contained within the acceptance interval (90%-111%) applied to NTI drugs. Intra-subject variability for AUC was <10% for 53 (88%) of the 60 products for which this measure was reported. Many gabapentin generics showed broader, 90% CIs for bioequivalence estimates, and greater intra-subject variability, compared with generics of other ASMs. When interpreted within the context of other available data, these results suggest that any risk of non-bioequivalence between these individual generic products is small, and that switches across these products are not likely to result in clinically relevant changes in plasma drug exposure. The potential for variability in exposure when switching across generics is likely to be greatest for gabapentin., (© 2021 International League Against Epilepsy.)

Epinastine is an antiallergic drug with high selectivity for histamine receptors. It has been reported that 9,13b-dehydroepinastine is present as a metabolite in vivo in humans, but there was little information about their pharmacokinetics (PKs) in humans. Although several analytical methods have been reported for epinastine analysis in different matrices, none are available for its metabolite. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop an analytical method to simultaneously measure epinastine and its metabolite, 9,13b-dehydroepinastine, in human plasma samples using an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometer. Analytes were separated on a C 18 column. Quantification of this analysis was performed on a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer. Chromatograms showed high sensitivity, selectivity, and resolution with no interference with plasma constituents. Calibration curves for both epinastine and 9,13b-dehydroepinastine in human plasma were 0.1-50 ng/ml and displayed excellent linearity with correlation coefficients (r 2 ) >0.99. The developed analytical method satisfied the criteria of international guidance and was validated. The method could be successfully applied to pharmacokinetic studies of epinastine and, for the first time, the metabolite kinetics of epinastine to 9,13b-dehydroepinastine in humans after oral administration of 20 mg epinastine hydrochloride tablets. Our study is expected to be useful in future studies such as dosage settings and clinical pharmacotherapy., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

The purpose of the study was to develop two new methods, HPLC-UV and UPLC-MS/MS, for quantifying epinastine in human plasma and to compare pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters obtained using them. Even in the same sample, there may be a difference in the quantitative value of drug depending on the assay, so that minor changes in PK parameter values may affect drug dose and usage settings. Therefore, selection and establishment of analytical methods are very important in PK studies of drugs, and a comparison of PK parameters according to analytical methods will be vital. For this study of PK parameter change, we newly developed two methods, HPLC-UV and UPLC-MS/MS, which are most commonly used to quantify epinastine concentrations in human plasma. All developed methods satisfied the international guidelines and criteria for successful application to PK study of 20 mg epinastine hydrochloride tablets after oral administration to twenty-six humans. A comparison of these two methods for in vivo analysis of epinastine was performed for the first time. This comparison study confirmed that different dose and usage settings might be possible based on PK parameters calculated using other analyses. Such changes in calculated PK parameters according to analytical methods would be crucial in the clinic.

In this work, we developed and validated the specific, sensitive and simple LC-MS/MS method for quantification of eslicarbazepine in human plasma. The analyte samples were prepared through a simple one-step protein precipitation method by acetonitrile. The chromatographic separation was operated on an economical Hanbon ODS-2 C18 column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 10 μm) with isocratic elution using 10 mM ammonium acetate containing 0.01% formic acid and acetonitrile (72:28, v/v) as the mobile phase at the flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The mass quantification was carried on the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) of the transitions of m/z 255.1 → 194.1 for eslicarbazepine and m/z 446.1 → 321.1 for glipizide (the internal standard), respectively. The established method was validated with acceptable specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, extraction recovery, matrix effect and stability in accordance with FDA regulations. At last, the validated method was successfully applied to determination of eslicarbazepine in human plasma obtained from clinical study., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

A number of drug-releasing contact lenses are currently being studied to address issues inherent in eye drops as a drug delivery method. In this study, we developed epinastine hydrochloride-releasing daily soft contact lenses for treatment of allergic conjunctivitis and examined their in vitro and in vivo performance. Preformed soft contact lenses with/without ionic functional groups were soaked in a solution of epinastine hydrochloride in phosphate-buffered saline to prepare epinastine hydrochloride-releasing soft contact lenses. Among these contact lenses with different ionicities, anionic lenses demonstrated the maximum, relatively linear epinastine hydrochloride release, in vitro. The amount of epinastine hydrochloride release was directly proportional to the concentration of the epinastine hydrochloride solution used to prepare the contact lens. The epinastine hydrochloride-releasing anionic soft contact lens also demonstrated prolonged drug release and significantly greater efficacy compared with epinastine hydrochloride eye drops 12 h after treatment, in vivo. Further studies are required to determine the appropriate amount of epinastine hydrochloride to be contained in the anionic soft contact lenses., Competing Interests: I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Research grant from SEED CO., LTD. (Minami, Fukushima); paid employment by SEED CO., LTD. (Hino, Arai, Matsunaga). This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Objectives: Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily (QD) oral antiepileptic drug (AED) for focal-onset seizures (FOS). Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) models were developed to assess dose selection, identify significant AED drug interactions, and quantitate relationships between exposure and safety and efficacy outcomes from Phase 3 trials of adjunctive ESL., Methods: Eslicarbazepine (the primary active metabolite of ESL) population PK was evaluated using data from 1351 subjects enrolled in 14 studies (11 Phase 1 and three Phase 3 studies) after multiple oral doses ranging from 400 to 1200 mg. Population PK and PD models related individual eslicarbazepine exposures to safety outcomes and efficacy responses., Results: Eslicarbazepine PK was described by a one-compartment model with linear absorption and elimination. The probability of a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE; dizziness, headache, or somnolence) was higher with an initial dose of ESL 800 mg than with an initial dose of ESL 400 mg QD. Body weight, sex, region, and baseline use of carbamazepine (CBZ) or lamotrigine were also found to influence the probability of TEAEs. Eslicarbazepine exposure influenced serum sodium concentration, standardized seizure frequency, and probability of response; better efficacy outcomes were predicted in patients not from Western Europe (WE; vs WE patients) and those not taking CBZ (vs taking CBZ) at baseline., Conclusions: Pharmacokinetic and PK/PD modeling were implemented during the development of ESL for adjunctive treatment of FOS in adults. This quantitative approach supported decision-making during the development of ESL, and contributed to dosing recommendations and labeling information related to drug interactions., (© 2018 The Authors. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily oral antiepileptic drug (AED) indicated for partial-onset seizures (POS). ESL pharmacokinetics (PK) and exposure-response analyses were supported by 2 phase 3 conversion to ESL (1200, 1600 mg) monotherapy studies. The PK model development included 10 phase 1-2 studies (ESL 600-1200 mg daily). Seizure diaries were completed daily; subjects exited if seizures worsened. Exposure-response models were developed for time to study exit, probability of seizure freedom, time to first occurrence of dizziness, headache, and nausea; serum sodium levels were explored. A 1-compartment model with first-order absorption/elimination described ESL PK. Clearance and distribution volume were significantly related to body weight and sex. Higher eslicarbazepine minimum concentration (C min ) and use of 1 baseline AED were associated with significantly lower risk of study exit, whereas eslicarbazepine C min was a significant predictor of seizure freedom during the last 4 weeks of monotherapy. Eslicarbazepine exposure and the time to first occurrence of adverse events were not related. A shallow negative relationship described the relationship between change from baseline in serum sodium level and eslicarbazepine exposure. Eslicarbazepine apparent clearance and distribution volume estimates were similar to those reported for ESL adjunctive therapy. Dose adjustment based on body weight was not required. The time to study exit and probability of seizure freedom during the last 4 weeks of monotherapy were weakly related to eslicarbazepine exposure. Because the first occurrence of adverse events or hyponatremia were also not significantly related to eslicarbazepine exposure, dose adjustment using plasma eslicarbazepine concentrations is not supported., (© 2018, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

We report the most notable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the antiepileptic drugs commercialised in the last four years (eslicarbazepine acetate, brivaracetam and perampanel). Their efficacy and safety are analysed in open-label clinical trials, which are the ones that reproduce their use in everyday life, without the rigid protocols used in clinical trials.

Introduction: Patients with partial-onset seizures and comorbid cardiovascular disease may concomitantly receive eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), an antiepileptic drug, and rosuvastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. This study evaluated the effect of multiple-dose ESL on the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of a single dose of rosuvastatin in healthy subjects., Methods: This was a Phase I, single-center, fixed-sequence, open-label study. Healthy subjects received two treatments, in sequence. Treatment A: a single 40mg oral dose of rosuvastatin on Day 1, followed by a washout period (Days 1-4); treatment B: titration of ESL (400-800mg once daily) on Days 5-18, followed by ESL 1200mg once daily on Days 19-35, with a single dose of rosuvastatin (40mg) on Day 32. Subjects then entered a 2-week follow-up period. Plasma concentrations of rosuvastatin were quantified for PK analyses. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study., Results: Thirty-three healthy subjects were enrolled and 30 completed the study. Mean rosuvastatin (standard deviation) t 1/2 was similar when rosuvastatin was used concomitantly with ESL and when it was used alone (26.5 [16.3]h, and 22.4 [9.5]h, respectively). The geometric least squares mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of rosuvastatin exposure levels between rosuvastatin used concomitantly with ESL and rosuvastatin used alone were as follows: C max , 64.0% (55.9-73.3%); AUC (0-∞) , 63.0% (57.1-69.4%); and AUC (0-last) , 60.9% (55.2-67.1%). Concomitant use of ESL and rosuvastatin was generally well tolerated., Conclusions: Rosuvastatin exposure was 36-39% lower with steady-state administration of ESL, potentially due to reduced oral bioavailability of rosuvastatin. Consequently, when rosuvastatin is used with ESL, a rosuvastatin dose adjustment may be necessary if a clinically significant change in lipids is noted., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily antiepileptic drug that is approved as adjunctive therapy in adults with focal-onset seizures. Following oral administration, ESL is rapidly metabolized to its active metabolite, eslicarbazepine, which acts primarily by enhancing slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. The efficacy and safety/tolerability of ESL in the adjunctive setting were established in a comprehensive Phase III program (n = 1702 randomized patients) and this evidence has been supported by several open studies (n = 864). ESL treatment has demonstrated improvements in health-related quality of life, in both randomized clinical trials and open studies. ESL has also been shown to be usually well tolerated and efficacious when used in the adjunctive setting in elderly patients. The effectiveness of ESL as the only add-on to antiepileptic drug monotherapy has been demonstrated in a multinational study (n = 219), subgroup analyses of which have also shown it to be efficacious and generally well tolerated in patients who had previously not responded to carbamazepine therapy. Open studies have also demonstrated improvements in tolerability in patients switched overnight from oxcarbazepine to ESL. Due to differences in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and metabolism, there may be clinical situations in which it is appropriate to consider switching patients from oxcarbazepine or carbamazepine to ESL.

Background: Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED), still insufficiently studied regarding pharmacokinetic variability, efficacy and tolerability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data in Norway and relate pharmacokinetic variability to clinical efficacy and tolerability in a long-term clinical setting in patients with refractory epilepsy., Methods: This retrospective observational study included TDM-data from the main laboratories and population data from the Norwegian Prescription Database in Norway, in addition to clinical data from medical records of adult patients using ESL for up to three years, whenever possible., Results: TDM-data from 168 patients were utilized for assessment of pharmacokinetic variability, consisting of 71% of the total number of patients in Norway using ESL, 2011-14. Median daily dose of ESL was 800mg (range 400-1600mg), and median serum concentration of ESL was 53μmol/L (range 13-132μmol/L). Inter-patient variability of ESL was extensive, with 25-fold variability in concentration/dose ratios. Additional clinical data were available from 104 adult patients out of the 168, all with drug resistant focal epilepsy. After 1, 2 and 3 years follow-up, the retention rate of ESL was 83%, 72% and 64%, respectively. ESL was generally well tolerated as add-on treatment, but sedation, cognitive impairment and hyponatremia were reported. Hyponatremia (sodium <137mmol/L) was present in 36% of the patients, and lead to discontinuation in three., Conclusion: Pharmacokinetic variability of ESL was extensive and the demonstration of usefulness of TDM requires further studies. In patients with drug resistant focal Epilepsy, the high retention rate indicated good efficacy and tolerability. Hyponatremia was observed in one third of the patients. The present results point to a need for individualization of treatment and TDM may be useful., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new anti-epileptic drug (AED) chemically related to oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ) and is increasingly used in clinical practice. The purpose of the study was to investigate 2-way pharmacokinetic interactions between ESL and other AEDs as compared to OXC and CBZ., Methods: Anonymous data regarding age, gender, use of AEDs, daily doses and serum concentration measurements of ESL, OXC, CBZ and lamotrigine (LTG) and other AEDs were retrieved from 2 therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) databases in Norway. Drugs were categorized according to their known potential for interactions. Concentration/dose (C/D) ratios were calculated., Results: Data from 1100 patients were available. The C/D ratios of ESL and OXC were unchanged in combination with enzyme-inducing AEDs or valproate (VPA). The C/D ratio of CBZ decreased by 40% and 22% in combination with other enzyme-inducing AEDs or VPA, respectively, pointing to an increased clearance. ESL demonstrated no significant enzyme-inducing effect on LTG metabolism although there was a 20% and 34% decrease in the C/D ratio of LTG in combination with OXC and CBZ, respectively., Conclusions: Possible pharmacokinetic interactions have been studied for ESL as compared to OXC and CBZ. The pharmacokinetics of ESL is not affected by enzyme-inducing AEDs or VPA and does not affect the metabolism of LTG in contrast to OXC and CBZ. The study demonstrates the value of using TDM databases to explore the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions of new AEDs.

Rationale: Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily oral antiepileptic drug for the treatment of partial-onset seizures. Adverse events such as dizziness and somnolence reported in clinical studies suggest that ESL has detectable central nervous system (CNS) effects in addition to its antiepileptic effects. This Phase I study evaluated the abuse liability of ESL compared with that of alprazolam (ALP) and placebo (PBO) in recreational CNS depressant users., Methods: In this single-dose, randomized, double-blind, PBO- and active-controlled crossover study, healthy recreational CNS depressant users who could discern between ALP 2mg and PBO received single oral doses of each of the following treatments with a washout interval of ≥7days between each treatment: ESL (800mg, 1600mg, 2000mg, and 2400mg); ALP (1.5mg and 3.0mg); and PBO. Subjective measures, including visual analog scales (VASs) e.g., Drug-Liking (primary endpoint), and Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI) Morphine-Benzedrine Group (MBG), Pentobarbital Chlorpromazine Alcohol Group (PCAG), and Lysergic Acid Diethylamide Group scales were evaluated at multiple time points up to 24h postdose. Cognitive effects were evaluated using the Choice Reaction Time (CRT), Divided Attention (DAT) and Hopkins Verbal Learning Task-Revised tests., Principal Results: Peak scores for Drug-Liking VAS (maximum effect [Emax]) were significantly higher for both ALP doses than for PBO (p<0.0001), thereby confirming study validity. Drug-Liking VAS Emax was significantly lower for all ESL doses than both ALP doses (p<0.0001). Drug-Liking VAS Emax for ESL 800mg was similar to that for PBO (least squares [LS] mean difference: 3.6; p=0.19). At the three higher ESL doses (1600mg and the supratherapeutic doses of 2000mg and 2400mg), Drug-Liking VAS Emax was significantly higher than for PBO, although the differences were minimal (LS mean difference: 9.3-13.3 out of 100). For most secondary subjective endpoints (i.e., Good Effects VAS and High VAS, ARCI-MBG, Take Drug Again VAS, Overall Drug-Liking VAS, and ARCI-PCAG; p<0.05), the effect of ESL (all doses) was significantly less than that of ALP (both doses). On most secondary measures, the dose-response relationship was relatively flat or showed saturation at higher ESL doses. Although significant differences were observed for ESL compared with those for PBO for some specific CRT and DAT endpoints (i.e., reaction time, manual tracking, hit latency), ALP demonstrated significant and dose-dependent impairment on the majority of cognitive endpoints when compared with PBO and ESL. Mean plasma concentrations of the active metabolite of ESL, eslicarbazepine, increased with increasing ESL dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters estimated for eslicarbazepine were generally comparable with results from previous studies in healthy volunteers., Conclusion: This study demonstrated that single doses of ESL may have less abuse liability than ALP in recreational sedative users. Although ESL had detectable subjective effects and showed some drug-'liking' at higher doses, the magnitude of these effects was small., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The relative bioequivalence of crushed versus intact eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) tablets (800 mg) administered orally in healthy adults was evaluated in an open-label, randomized, 2-period crossover study with a 5-day washout between treatments. Sample blood levels of eslicarbazepine and (R)-licarbazepine were determined; pharmacokinetic parameters were derived for eslicarbazepine. Bioequivalence was established if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean treatment ratios of eslicarbazepine AUC(0-∞) and Cmax were within the prespecified 80%-125% range. Twenty-seven subjects in the intent-to-treat population (n = 28) completed both treatment periods. Eslicarbazepine exposure measures were similar for crushed versus intact ESL tablets: average Cmax , 11 700 versus 11 500 ng/mL; AUC(0-∞) , 225 000 versus 234 000 ng·h/mL; AUC(0-last) , 222 000 versus 231 000 ng·h/mL, respectively. Geometric least squares mean ratios (90%CIs) comparing eslicarbazepine exposure measures were within the 80%-125% range (Cmax , 102.63% [97.07%-108.51%]; AUC(0-∞) , 96.72% [94.36%-99.13%]; AUC0-last , 96.69% [94.24%-99.21%]). In conclusion, ESL administered orally as a crushed tablet sprinkled on applesauce, or intact were bioequivalent in healthy subjects. Eslicarbazepine bioavailability was not significantly altered by crushing, indicating that ESL tablets can be administered intact or crushed., (© 2016, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: Notch signalling regulates stem cell development and survival and is deregulated in multiple malignancies. LY900009 is a small molecule inhibitor of Notch signalling via selective inhibition of the γ-secretase protein. We report the first-in-human phase I trial of LY900009., Methods: Dose escalation (Part A) was performed in cohorts of three advanced cancer patients using a modified continual reassessment method and dose confirmation (Part B) was performed in ovarian cancer patients. LY900009 was taken orally thrice weekly (every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday) during a 28-d cycle. The primary objective determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD); secondary end-points included toxicity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumour activity., Results: Thirty-five patients received LY900009 at dose levels ranging from 2-60 mg. Study drug-related adverse events were diarrhoea (46%), vomiting (34%), anorexia (31%), nausea (31%), and fatigue (23%). At 30 mg, a dose-limiting toxicity (grade III mucosal inflammation) was observed. LY900009 absorption was rapid, with median tmax at 1-4 h post-dose. LY900009 inhibited plasma levels of amyloid-β peptide in a dose-dependent manner with 80-90% inhibition observed in the 30- to 60-mg cohorts. No responses were seen, but five patients had stable disease. Two patients (5.7%) with leiomyosarcoma and ovarian cancer received four cycles of therapy. One patient (15 mg) showed markedly increased glandular mucin consistent with pharmacologic inhibition of the Notch pathway., Conclusions: The recommended MTD schedule for future studies was 30 mg thrice weekly, which exceeds the target inhibition level observed in preclinical models to promote tumour regression in humans., (Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The present investigation was aimed towards developing a beta-cyclodextrin (β-CD) solid dispersion (SD) based orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), for improving the dissolution and providing fast onset of anti-epileptic action. Optimum ratio of ESL and β-CD was determined by Job's plot. Thereafter, solid dispersions were prepared by solvent evaporation method and evaluated for yield, assay, Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infra red spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and in vitro dissolution. Optimized SD was compressed into ODT by direct compression using super disintegrants and evaluated for wetting time, drug content, in vitro drug release and in vivo studies. The results of DSC, FTIR and XRD analysis supported the formation of inclusion complex. An improved dissolution with 99.95 ± 2.80% drug release in 60 min was observed in comparison to 24.85 ± 2.96% release from a plain drug suspension. Tablets with crosspovidone as a super disintegrant showed the least disintegration time of 24.66 ± 1.52 s and higher in vitro drug release against marketed tablets. In vivo studies indicated that the formulated tablets had 2 times higher bioavailability than marketed tablets. Thus, the developed β-CD-ESL SD-ODT could provide faster onset of action and higher bioavailability, which would be beneficial in case of epileptic seizures., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a novel antiepileptic drug registered as the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults. As a third-generation medication, ESL is believed to have favorable efficacy/safety profile and pharmacokinetic properties in comparison with related drugs (carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine)., Areas Covered: The aim of the paper was to evaluate pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of ESL with aspect to epilepsy treatment. The review of the scientific literature was based on the PubMed database, Clinical Trials, FDA and European Medicines Agency websites to elicit current information on drug metabolism, mechanism of action and efficacy/safety profile., Expert Opinion: Results of clinical trials indicate that ESL possessed a favorable profile of anticonvulsant efficacy and tolerability as an add-on therapy in adult patients at daily doses of 800 and 1200 mg. Pediatric trials are in progress and their results will allow to characterize a role of ESL in the treatment of epilepsy in children.

In human epilepsy, pharmacoresistance to antiepileptic drug therapy is a major problem affecting a substantial fraction of patients. Many of the currently available antiepileptic drugs target voltage-gated sodium channels, leading to a rate-dependent suppression of neuronal discharge. A loss of use-dependent block has emerged as a potential cellular mechanism of pharmacoresistance for anticonvulsants acting on voltage-gated sodium channels. There is a need both for compounds that overcome this resistance mechanism and for novel drugs that inhibit the process of epileptogenesis. We show that eslicarbazepine acetate, a once-daily antiepileptic drug, may constitute a candidate compound that addresses both issues. Eslicarbazepine acetate is converted extensively to eslicarbazepine after oral administration. We have first tested using patch-clamp recording in human and rat hippocampal slices if eslicarbazepine, the major active metabolite of eslicarbazepine acetate, shows maintained activity in chronically epileptic tissue. We show that eslicarbazepine exhibits maintained use-dependent blocking effects both in human and experimental epilepsy with significant add-on effects to carbamazepine in human epilepsy. Second, we show that eslicarbazepine acetate also inhibits Cav3.2 T-type Ca(2+) channels, which have been shown to be key mediators of epileptogenesis. We then examined if transitory administration of eslicarbazepine acetate (once daily for 6 weeks, 150 mg/kg or 300 mg/kg) after induction of epilepsy in mice has an effect on the development of chronic seizures and neuropathological correlates of chronic epilepsy. We found that eslicarbazepine acetate exhibits strong antiepileptogenic effects in experimental epilepsy. EEG monitoring showed that transitory eslicarbazepine acetate treatment resulted in a significant decrease in seizure activity at the chronic state, 8 weeks after the end of treatment. Moreover, eslicarbazepine acetate treatment resulted in a significant decrease in mossy fibre sprouting into the inner molecular layer of pilocarpine-injected mice, as detected by Timm staining. In addition, epileptic animals treated with 150 mg/kg, but not those that received 300 mg/kg eslicarbazepine acetate showed an attenuated neuronal loss. These results indicate that eslicarbazepine potentially overcomes a cellular resistance mechanism to conventional antiepileptic drugs and at the same time constitutes a potent antiepileptogenic agent., (© The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder. Despite a broad range of commonly used antiepileptic drugs, approximately 30% of patients with epilepsy have drug resistance or encounter significant adverse effects. Eslicarbazepine acetate is a new central nervous system-active compound with anticonvulsant activity whose mechanism of action is by blocking the voltage-gated sodium channel. Eslicarbazepine acetate was approved by the European Medicines Agency and launched onto the European market in 2009 for adjunctive treatment in adult subjects of partial-onset seizures, with or without secondary generalization. This article provides an overview on the recent studies on eslicarbazepine acetate in the treatment of drug-resistant partial epilepsy. Efficacy and safety of this drug for partial-onset seizures were assessed in four randomized clinical trials with responder rates ranged between 17% and 43%. Adverse events were usually mild to moderate in intensity and the most common were dizziness, somnolence, nausea, diplopia, headache, vomiting, abnormal coordination, blurred vision, vertigo and fatigue. Eslicarbazepine acetate is not recommended below 18 years, but a published phase II trial had the main goal to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of this drug in pediatric population. Eslicarbazepine acetate appears to be a safe and effective drug with a linear pharmacokinetics, very low potential for drug-drug interactions and therefore it can offer a valid alternative to current antiepileptic drugs. Additionally, it is undergoing investigation for monotherapy in subjects with partial epilepsy, and other neurological and psychiatric disorders., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Investigate the pharmacokinetics of once-daily (QD; 900 mg) and twice-daily (BID; 450 mg) regimens of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) and BID (450 mg) regimen of oxcarbazepine (OXC) at steady state in healthy volunteers., Methods: Single-center, open-label, randomized, three-way (n = 12) crossover studies in healthy volunteers., Key Findings: Mean eslicarbazepine Cmax,ss (in μm) following ESL QD (87.3) was 33.3% higher (p < 0.05) compared to ESL BID (65.5) and 82.1% higher (p < 0.05) compared to OXC BID (48.0). The mean area under the curve (AUC)ss,0-τ (in μmol h/L) following the last dose of an 8-day repeated dosing was 1156.3, 1117.6, and 968.4 for ESL QD, ESL BID, and OXC BID, respectively. The ratio eslicarbazepine plasma exposure (μmol h/L) to ESL daily-dose (μmol) was 0.381 (1156.3:3037.3), 0.368 (1117.6:3037.3), and 0.271 (968.4:3567.6) for ESL-QD, ESL-BID, and OXC-BID, respectively, which translates into a 40.6% increase in the ability of ESL-QD compared to OXC-BID to deliver into the plasma their major active entity eslicarbazepine. The extent of plasma exposure to ESL minor metabolites: (R)-licarbazepine and oxcarbazepine after ESL-QD was 71.5% and 61.1% lower, respectively, than after OXC-BID. Twenty, 24 and 38 treatment emergent adverse events were reported with ESL-QD, ESL-BID, and OXC-BID, respectively., Significance: ESL-QD resulted in 33.3% higher peak plasma concentration (Cmax,ss ) of eslicarbazepine and similar extent of plasma exposure (AUCss,0-τ ) when compared to ESL-BID, which may contribute to the efficacy profile reported with once-daily ESL. In comparison to OXC-BID, administration of ESL-QD resulted in 40.6% increase in the delivery of eslicarbazepine into the plasma as well as a significantly lower systemic exposure to (R)-licarbazepine and oxcarbazepine., (Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2013 International League Against Epilepsy.)

Objective: To investigate the effect of once-daily (QD) eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) 800 mg and 1,200 mg administration on pharmacokinetics of a combined ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel oral contraceptive (OC) in women of childbearing potential., Methods: Two two-way, crossover, two-period, randomized, open-label studies were performed in 20 healthy female subjects, each. In one period (ESL+OC period), subjects received ESL 800 mg QD in one study and ESL 1200 mg QD in the other study, for 15 days; concomitantly with the Day 14 ESL dose, an oral single dose of 30 μg ethinylestradiol and 150 μg levonorgestrel was administered. In the other period (OC alone), a single dose of 30 μg ethinylestradiol and 150 μg levonorgestrel was administered. Three weeks or more separated the periods. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for differences between pharmacokinetic parameters of 30 μg ethinylestradiol and 150 μg levonorgestrel following ESL+OC and OC alone, and 90% confidence intervals (90%CI) for the ESL+OC/OC alone geometric mean ratio (GMR) were calculated., Results: ESL significantly decreased the systemic exposure to both ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel. GMR (90%CI) for AUC0-24 of ethinylestradiol were 68% (64%; 71%) following 1,200 mg ESL and 75% (71%; 79%) following 800 mg ESL. GMR (90%CI) for AUC0-24 of levonorgestrel were 76% (68%; 86%) following 1,200 mg ESL and 89% (82%; 97%) following 800 mg ESL., Conclusions: A clinically relevant dose-dependent effect of ESL administration on the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel was observed. Therefore, to avoid inadvertent pregnancy, women of childbearing potential should use other adequate methods of contraception during treatment with ESL, and, in case ESL treatment is discontinued, until CYP3A4 activity returns to normal., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the bioavailability (BA) and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and to demonstrate the bioequivalence (BE) between two active product ingredient (API) sources of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in healthy volunteers., Design, Subjects and Methods: Forty healthy male and female subjects aged 18-40 years were randomized to treatment with 400 or 800 mg ESL marketed (MF) formulation [current active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) source] and 400 or 800 mg ESL to-be-marketed (TBM) formulation (new API source) under a gender-balanced, two-period, two-sequence crossover open-label study design. Subjects were assigned to receive either 400 or 800 mg ESL dose strengths, and each was randomly administered on two occasions--either a single oral tablet of MF or a single oral tablet of TBM--separated by a washout period of at least 7 days. Formulations were to be considered bioequivalent if, for both 400 or 800 mg ESL dosage strengths, the test (TBM)/reference (MF) geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) were within the predetermined range of 80-125%., Results: Test/reference GMR (90% CI) for the Cmax and AUC was respectively 100% (94-109%) and 96% (94-98%) following 400 mg ESL and 100% (95-105%) and 100% (97-103%) following 800 mg ESL., Conclusion: Oral tablet formulations of either 400 or 800 mg ESL from the new API source were found to be bioequivalent to the corresponding marketed Zebinix® formulation according to the regulatory definition of bioequivalence.

Purpose: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of once-daily eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) and twice-daily oxcarbazepine (OXC) and their metabolites in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma following repeated oral administration., Methods: Single-center, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study in healthy volunteers. Volunteers in ESL group (n = 7) received 600 mg on days 1-3 and 1,200 mg on days 4-9, once daily. Volunteers in the OXC group (n = 7) received 300 mg on days 1-3 and 600 mg on days 4-9, twice daily. Plasma and CSF sampling was performed following the last dose., Key Findings: Eslicarbazepine was the major drug entity in plasma and CSF, accounting for, respectively, 93.84% and 91.96% of total exposure in the ESL group and 78.06% and 76.42% in the OXC group. The extent of exposure to drug entities R-licarbazepine and oxcarbazepine was approximately four-fold higher with OXC as compared with ESL. There was relatively little fluctuation from peak-to-trough (ratio) in the CSF for both eslicarbazepine (ESL = 1.5; OXC = 1.2) and R-licarbazepine (ESL = 1.2; OXC = 1.2). In contrast, oxcarbazepine showed larger differences between peak and trough (ESL = 3.1; OXC = 6.4). A total of 84 and 24 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported with OXC and ESL, respectively., Significance: In comparison to OXC, administration of ESL resulted in more eslicarbazepine, less R-licarbazepine, and less oxcarbazepine in plasma and CSF, which may correlate with the tolerability profile reported with ESL. The smaller peak-to-trough fluctuation of eslicarbazepine in CSF (a measure of sustained delivery to the brain) than in plasma supports once-daily dosing of ESL., (Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2012 International League Against Epilepsy.)

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a novel once-daily antiepileptic drug (AED) approved in Europe since 2009 that was found to be efficacious and well tolerated in a phase III clinical program in adult patients with partial onset seizures previously not controlled with treatment with one to three AEDs, including carbamazepine (CBZ). ESL shares with CBZ and oxcarbazepine (OXC) the dibenzazepine nucleus bearing the 5-carboxamide substitute, but is structurally different at the 10,11 position. This molecular variation results in differences in metabolism, preventing the formation of toxic epoxide metabolites such as carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide. Unlike OXC, which is metabolized to both eslicarbazepine and (R)-licarbazepine, ESL is extensively converted to eslicarbazepine. The systemic exposure to eslicarbazepine after ESL oral administration is approximately 94% of the parent dose, with minimal exposure to (R)-licarbazepine and OXC. After ESL oral administration, the effective half-life (t(1/2,eff) ) of eslicarbazepine was 20-24 h, which is approximately two times longer than its terminal half-life (t(1/2)). At clinically relevant doses (400-1,600 mg/day) ESL has linear pharmacokinetics (PK) with no effects of gender or moderate liver impairment. However, because eslicarbazepine is eliminated primarily (66%) by renal excretion, dose adjustment is recommended for patients with renal impairment. Eslicarbazepine clearance is induced by phenobarbital, phenytoin, and CBZ and it dose-dependently decreases plasma exposure of oral contraceptive and simvastatin., (Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2012 International League Against Epilepsy.)

This study investigated the effect of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) on cardiac repolarization in healthy adult volunteers. A randomized, placebo/active-controlled, 4-period crossover study was conducted in 67 participants. In 3 periods, participants received once-daily doses of ESL 1200 mg, ESL 2400 mg, and placebo for 5 days; in 1 period, participants received placebo on days 1 to 4 and a 400-mg moxifloxacin single dose on day 5. In each period, 24-hour 12-lead Holter monitoring was performed on days -;1 (baseline) and 5. There was no clinically relevant effect of ESL 1200 mg and 2400 mg versus placebo on cardiac depolarization or repolarization as measured by the QRS or QTc intervals, respectively. Mean PR interval increased following ESL 1200 mg and 2400 mg, but there was no participant with a PR interval above the upper limit of the normal range (200 ms). The upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for the placebo-corrected change from baseline of the individually corrected QT interval (QTcI) following administration of ESL 1200 mg and ESL 2400 mg was <10 ms at every time point. Moxifloxacin caused an increase in QTcI above the 10-ms threshold for clinical significance at several time points, demonstrating assay sensitivity. It is concluded that administration of ESL 1200 mg and ESL 2400 mg did not induce a clinically significant prolongation of the QTcI interval., (2012 American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Parallel artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA) has been successfully applied by pharmaceutical industries as high-throughput technique capable of screening compounds for passive oral absorption. Herein, the possible applicability of this assay to predict simultaneously biodistribution parameters such as plasma protein binding (PPB) and apparent volume of distribution (VD) was investigated for the first time. Apparent permeability (P(app) ) of 18 reference drugs was determined by nine PAMPA conditions and compared with the corresponding intestinal absorption fraction (Fa), PPB, and VD in humans. In all the models, P(app) was not correlated with VD; however, it was correlated with Fa and PPB. In these cases, the best correlations (r ≥ 0.8953) were found when using a membrane of 2% of l-α-phosphatidylcholine, at pH 6.5/7.4 for donor/acceptor compartments. Under these conditions, good correlation with traditional PAMPA (r = 0.9633) and Caco-2 models (r = 0.9246) were also achieved. This method correctly predicted compounds' permeability and was robust enough to distinguish compounds with high Fa (P(app) ≥ 1.1 × 10(-6) cm/s) and PPB (P(app) ≥ 1.0 × 10(-5) cm/s), with no false positives or negatives recorded. In addition, ultrafiltration method was used to determine the PPB of 10 tested derivatives of dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide, which were also assessed through the new PAMPA model developed herein, and equal classifications were achieved., (Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Eslicarbazepine acetate (Zebenix®) is a voltage-gated sodium channel blocker approved in 2009 by the European Medicines Agency as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures, with or without secondary generalization., Objectives: The objectives of the current population pharmacokinetic (PK) and PK/pharmacodynamic analyses were to characterize the population PK of eslicarbazepine (the main active metabolite of eslicarbazepine acetate), to evaluate the influence of patient factors and concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the PK variability of eslicarbazepine, to assess the effect of eslicarbazepine acetate on the PK of concomitant AEDs and to investigate the relationship between eslicarbazepine systemic exposure and eslicarbazepine acetate antiepileptic activity in patients with partial-onset seizures uncontrolled with one to three AEDs., Methods: Sparse plasma concentrations of eslicarbazepine and concomitant AEDs, along with efficacy data, were obtained from 641 patients enrolled in eslicarbazepine acetate phase III studies. Data were analysed using nonlinear mixed-effect modelling methods. Most analyses used a model using log-transformed data from trough concentration (minimum steady-state plasma concentration during a dosage interval [C(min,ss)]). The model estimated the apparent total body clearance from plasma (CL/F), which is sufficient to predict average plasma concentrations at steady state (C(av,ss)). After the final model was validated, individual concentrations at steady state were predicted, and exposure parameters (area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 hours, C(min,ss) and C(av,ss)) for a one-compartmental model with first-order elimination were calculated., Results: Eslicarbazepine CL/F was affected by bodyweight, dose of carbamazepine (D(CAR)) and co-administration of barbiturates or phenytoin (AED(PB)), as predicted by the equation CL/F = (2.36 + 0.00149 • D(CAR) + 1.41 • AED(PB)) • (weight/70)0.75, which means that CL/F is 2.36 L/h for a subject with a bodyweight of 70 kg and without concomitant carbamazepine and barbiturates/phenytoin. Concomitant use of lamotrigine, valproic acid, topiramate, gabapentin, clobazam and levetiracetam showed no effect on the exposure to eslicarbazepine. Inter-individual variability of eslicarbazepine CL/F was 44% and the residual error (intra-subject variability) was proportional to the log of concentrations, with a coefficient of variation of 6%. Age, ethnicity, sex and creatinine clearance did not affect eslicarbazepine CL/F. Eslicarbazepine acetate did not affect the CL/F of clobazam, gabapentin, phenytoin, phenobarbital, levetiracetam and valproic acid. Eslicarbazepine acetate slightly increased the CL/F of carbamazepine (up to 14%), lamotrigine (up to 12%) and topiramate (up to 16%). The antiepileptic effect of eslicarbazepine acetate, as assessed by a decrease in seizure frequency, increased with the increase of eslicarbazepine acetate dose and eslicarbazepine concentrations. The concomitant administration of other AEDs did not affect the eslicarbazepine acetate exposure-response relationship., Conclusions: The magnitude of the effect of eslicarbazepine acetate on the CL/F of the concomitant AEDs assessed appears to be not clinically relevant and does not justify the need for dose adjustment in most patients. A continuous dose-response relationship was observed between eslicarbazepine concentrations and seizure frequency reduction, which was not affected by concomitant AEDs.

TLN-4601 is a farnesylated dibenzodiazepinone isolated from Micromonospora sp. with an antiproliferative effect on several human cancer cell lines. Although the mechanism of action of TLN-4601 is unknown, our earlier work indicated that TLN-4601 binds the PBR (peripheral benzodiazepine receptor; more recently known as the translocator protein or TSPO), an 18 kDa protein associated with the mitochondrial permeability transition (mPT) pore. While the exact function of the PBR remains a matter of debate, it has been implicated in heme and steroid synthesis, cellular growth and differentiation, oxygen consumption and apoptosis. Using the Jurkat immortalized T-lymphocyte cell line, documented to have negligible PBR expression, and Jurkat cells stably transfected with a human PBR cDNA, the present study demonstrates that TLN-4601 induces apoptosis independently of PBR expression. As PBRs are overexpressed in brain tumors compared to normal brain, we examined if TLN-4601 would preferentially accumulate in tumors using an intra-cerebral tumor model. Our results demonstrate the ability of TLN-4601 to effectively bind the PBR in vivo as determined by competitive binding assay and receptor occupancy. Analysis of TLN-4601 tissue and plasma indicated that TLN-4601 preferentially accumulates in the tumor. Indeed, drug levels were 200-fold higher in the tumor compared to the normal brain. TLN-4601 accumulation in the tumor (176 μg/g) was also significant compared to liver (24.8 μg/g; 7-fold) and plasma (16.2 μg/mL; 11-fold). Taken together our data indicate that while PBR binding does not mediate cell growth inhibition and apoptosis, PBR binding may allow for the specific accumulation of TLN-4601 in PBR positive tumors., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Racemic licarbazepine (Lic) is the active metabolite of oxcarbazepine (OXC) and eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), appearing in human plasma as S-licarbazepine (S-Lic) and R-licarbazepine (R-Lic). However, human metabolism of OXC and ESL to Lic differs in the S-Lic/R-Lic enantiomeric ratio observed in plasma. S-Lic appears in higher proportion after ESL administration than after OXC (95% versus 80%). Enantioselective pharmacokinetics of Lic enantiomers have been found in mice after their separate administration and in humans following OXC treatment. Since protein binding of drugs may be enantioselective and a determining factor of pharmacokinetics, the binding of S-Lic and R-Lic to mouse and human total plasma proteins and, specifically, to human serum albumin (HSA) and alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein (AGP) were herein investigated for the first time. Free and bound fractions of S-Lic and R-Lic were separated by ultrafiltration after previous in vitro incubation of spiked plasma samples and protein solutions with each enantiomer at 10, 25 and 50 microg/ml. The results revealed that the extent of binding of Lic enantiomers to total plasma proteins was 30% and independent of the drug concentration and species considered. The data also suggest that the binding of Lic enantiomers to HSA is greater than that to AGP. Moreover, absence of enantioselectivity in the binding of Lic enantiomers to mouse and human plasma proteins and to HSA and AGP is evident. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the enantioselectivity observed in vivo in the biodisposition of S-Lic and R-Lic is not dependent on their affinity to plasma proteins., (2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Objective: Combination therapy is frequently required in the management of epilepsy. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction between eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) 1200 mg once daily and topiramate (TPM) 200 mg once daily in healthy subjects., Methods: Multiple-dose, open-label, one-sequence study in two parallel groups of 16 healthy male volunteers. After an 8-day treatment with ESL (Group A) or TPM (Group B), ESL and TPM were co-administered for 19 days. A bioequivalence approach based on a within-subject comparison was used to investigate a potential drug-drug interaction. End/start of treatment geometric mean ratios (GMR, %) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) were calculated for maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval at steady-state (AUC(ss)) of eslicarbazepine (ESL major active metabolite), R-licarbazepine (ESL minor active metabolite) and TPM at Day 8 and Day 27., Results: In Group A, eslicarbazepine GMR (90% CI) was 86.79% (81.06%; 92.94%) for C(max) and 92.70% (89.21%; 96.32%) for AUC(ss). In Group B, TPM GMR (90% CI) was 81.50% (77.48%; 85.89%) for C(max) and 81.81% (79.69%; 84.00%) for AUC(ss). The 90% CI of eslicarbazepine C(max) and AUC(ss) fell within the pre-specified bioequivalence range (80.00%; 125.00%), allowing it to be concluded that the extent of systemic exposure to eslicarbazepine was unaffected by the concomitant administration of TPM. The 90% CI for topiramate AUC(ss) was borderline in relation to the pre-specified bioequivalence range and topiramate C(max) fell outside the pre-specified bioequivalence range. Therefore, the extent of systemic exposure to TPM following co-administration with ESL was not formally bioequivalent to the extent of systemic exposure to TPM when TPM was administered alone. However, there was no difference between TPM elimination half-life following TPM co-administered with ESL and TPM administered alone (24.0 and 24.3 h, respectively). The bioavailability of R-licarbazepine was essentially bioequivalent. Two subjects discontinued due to adverse events. No clinical interaction appeared to be present in terms of adverse events when both drugs were given concomitantly., Conclusion: Concomitant administration of eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg once daily and topiramate 200 mg once daily showed no significant change in exposure to eslicarbazepine but an 18% decrease in exposure to topiramate, most likely caused by a reduced bioavailability of topiramate. No dose adjustment is required.

Objective: Anti-epileptic drugs are often used in combination. Both eslicarbazepine (main metabolite of eslicarbazepine acetate, ESL) and lamotrigine undergo conjugation with glucuronic acid, and both eslicarbazepine and its glucuronide and lamotrigine glucuronide undergo extensive renal elimination; therefore, there is a potential for interaction. This study investigated the interaction between ESL and lamotrigine in healthy subjects., Methods: Open-label study in two parallel groups of 16 healthy volunteers each. After an 8-day treatment with ESL or lamotrigine, ESL (1200 mg once-daily) and lamotrigine (150 mg once-daily) were co-administered for 19 days. Geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) for maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve in the dosing interval (AUC(0-24)) were calculated for eslicarbazepine (ESL active metabolite) and lamotrigine., Results: The C(max) and AUC(0-24) GMR (90% CI) were, respectively, 95% (87-102%) and 96% (91-102%) for eslicarbazepine, and 88% (82-94%) and 86% (81-92%) for lamotrigine. The 90% CI of the C(max) and AUC(0-24) GMR fell within the prespecified acceptance interval (80-125%) both for eslicarbazepine and lamotrigine., Conclusion: There was no significant pharmacokinetic interaction between ESL and lamotrigine in healthy subjects. Therefore, no dosage adjustment appears to be usually required in either lamotrigine or ESL when the drugs are co-administered.

Purpose: To study the efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial seizures in adults with >or=4 partial-onset seizures (simple or complex, with or without secondary generalization) per 4 weeks despite treatment with 1-2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs)., Methods: This multicenter, parallel-group study had an 8-week, single-blind, placebo baseline phase, after which patients were randomized to placebo (n = 102) or once-daily ESL 400 mg (n = 100), 800 mg (n = 98), or 1,200 mg (n = 102) in the double-blind treatment phase. ESL starting dose was 400 mg; thereafter, ESL was titrated at weekly 400-mg steps to the full maintenance dose (12 weeks)., Results: Seizure frequency adjusted per 4 weeks over the maintenance period (primary endpoint) was significantly lower than placebo in the ESL 1,200-mg (p = 0.0003) and 800-mg (p = 0.0028) groups [analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) of log-transformed seizure frequency]. Responder rate was 20% (placebo), 23% (400 mg), 34% (800 mg), and 43% (1,200 mg). Median relative reduction in seizure frequency was 16% (placebo), 26% (400 mg), 36% (800 mg), and 45% (1,200 mg). The most frequent concomitant AEDs were carbamazepine (56-62% of patients), lamotrigine (25-27%), and valproic acid (22-28%). Similar efficacy results were obtained in patients administered ESL with or without carbamazepine as concomitant AED. Discontinuation rates caused by adverse events (AEs) were 3.9% (placebo), 4% (400 mg), 8.2% (800 mg), and 19.6% (1,200 mg). AEs in >10% of any group were dizziness, headache, and diplopia. Most AEs were mild or moderate., Discussion: ESL, 800 and 1,200 mg once-daily, was well tolerated and more effective than placebo in patients who were refractory to treatment with one or two concomitant AEDs.

Background: Epilepsy is a neurological condition with an increased probability of seizure occurrence through time. Although many anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) exist, they fail to treat seizures in 30% of patients with epilepsy. For these patients, new AEDs potentially more efficacious and safe are developed., Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in the treatment of patients with refractory epilepsy., Methods: A review of the literature was carried out using PubMed central. A direct contact with the drug manufacturer and developer was made., Results/conclusion: ESL is an AED that acts by inhibiting voltage-gated sodium channels. It has proved efficacious in the treatment of patients with refractory focal-onset epilepsy with a good safety profile. Evaluation of its use for treating other epileptic syndromes and its role as an initial treatment option for patients with epilepsy is warranted.

This study investigates the pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), a new voltage-gated sodium channel blocker, in epileptic children aged 2 to 7 years (n = 11) and 7 to 11 years (n = 8) and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years (n = 10). The study explores ESL efficacy and tolerability. Patients were treated with ESL once-daily doses of 5 mg/kg/day on weeks 1 to 4, 15 mg/kg/day on weeks 5 to 8, and 30 mg/kg/day (or 1800 mg/day, whichever was less) on weeks 9 to 12. At the end of each 4-week period, a 24-hour pharmacokinetic profiling was performed. Similar to adults, ESL was rapidly metabolized to eslicarbazepine. In all age groups, eslicarbazepine peak concentrations were reached 0.5 hour to 3 hours after ESL dosing, and C(max) and AUC(0-24) were dose proportional. Eslicarbazepine C(max) was similar between age groups following administration of identical ESL dose/kg, but AUC(0-24) depended on age due to a faster plasma clearance of eslicarbazepine in younger children compared with adolescents. R-licarbazepine and oxcarbazepine were minor metabolites. A dose-dependent decrease in seizure frequency was observed in children aged 2 to 7 years and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years but not in children aged 7 to 11 years. One patient in each group became seizure free. ESL was generally well tolerated.

The stereoselective disposition of S-licarbazepine (S-Lic) and R-licarbazepine (R-Lic) was investigated in plasma, brain, liver, and kidney tissues after their individual administration (350 mg/kg) to mice by oral gavage. Plasma, brain, liver, and kidney concentrations of licarbazepine enantiomers and their metabolites were determined over the time by a validated chiral HPLC-UV method. The mean concentration data, attained at each time point, were analyzed using a non-compartmental model. S-Lic and R-Lic were rapidly absorbed from gastrointestinal tract of mouse and immediately distributed to tissues supplied with high blood flow rates. Both licarbazepine enantiomers were metabolized to a small extent, each parent compound being mainly responsible for the systemic and tissue drug exposure. The stereoselectivity in the metabolism and distribution of S- and R-Lic was easily identified. An additional metabolite was detected following R-Lic administration and S-Lic showed a particular predisposition for hepatic and renal accumulation. Stereoselective processes were also identified at the blood-brain barrier, with the brain exposure to S-Lic almost twice that of R-Lic. Another finding, reported here for the first time, was the ability of the mouse to perform the chiral inversion of S- and R-Lic, albeit to a small extent., ((c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Two studies characterized single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of licarbazepine immediate-release tablets and food effects on single-dose pharmacokinetics. In 1 study, 12 volunteers received 500 mg licarbazepine on day 1, 500 mg bid on days 3 to 6, and 500 mg on day 7. In the second study, 12 subjects received one 500-mg licarbazepine dose under fasted and fed conditions. After multiple dosing, geometric mean (%CV) Cmax ss, Cmin ss, and AUCtau were 77.6 micromol/L (18), 45.3 micromol/L (25), and 747 h.mol/L (19), respectively, with a tmax of 2 hours. Mean half-lives were 9.3 and 11.3 hours for single and multiple dosing, respectively. Food had no clinically significant effect on single-dose pharmacokinetics. Half-life ( approximately 10 hours) and low intersubject variability in main pharmacokinetic parameters were similar under fasted and fed conditions. Median tmax increased from 1.5 to 2.5 hours with food. Licarbazepine is well tolerated and has predictable pharmacokinetics.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of moderate liver impairment on the pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093, ESL), a novel voltage-gated sodium channel blocker currently in clinical development., Methods: The pharmacokinetics of ESL following an administration regimen of 800 mg once-daily for 8 days was characterized in patients with moderate liver impairment (n = 8) and in subjects with normal liver function (n = 8, control group)., Results: Eslicarbazepine acetate was rapidly and extensively metabolized by first-pass metabolism to its main active metabolite, eslicarbazepine (S-licarbazepine). There were more subjects with measurable plasma concentrations of the parent drug (ESL) in the hepatic impairment group than in the control group, suggesting that first-pass metabolism was slightly decreased by liver impairment. However, ESL plasma concentrations remained very low, representing only about 0.01% of total systemic exposure. No differences in the pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine or its metabolites were found between the hepatic impairment and control groups. Urinary excretion of eslicarbazepine and its glucuronide form was similar in the liver impaired and control subjects. The sum of drug moieties recovered in the urine corresponded to 91% of the administered dose in the control group and to 84% of the administered dose in the liver impairment group., Conclusion: The pharmacokinetics of ESL was not affected by moderate hepatic impairment. Therefore, patients with mild to moderate liver impairment treated with ESL do not require dosage adjustment.

Objective: Antiepileptic drugs are often used in patients with some degree of renal impairment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of renal function on the pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL, formerly known as BIA 2-093), a new antiepileptic drug under clinical development., Methods: ESL pharmacokinetics following 800 mg single dose was characterized in subjects with normal renal function (n=8, control group), and in patients with mild renal impairment (n=8), moderate renal impairment (n=8), severe renal impairment (n=8), and end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis (n=8)., Results: ESL suffered extensive first-pass hydrolysis to eslicarbazepine (S-licarbazepine), the main active metabolite. While eslicarbazepine Cmax did not significantly differ between the different groups, the extent of systemic exposure, assessed by AUC, increased when renal function decreased. Eslicarbazepine CL/F and CLR were, respectively, 3.40 l/h and 1.04 l/h (17.3 ml/min) in the control group, and 2.10 l/h (35.0 ml/min) and 0.61 l/h (10.2 ml/min) in the mild, 1.60 l/h (26.7 ml/min) and 0.22 l/h (3.7 ml/min) in the moderate, and 1.33 l/h (21.2 ml/min) and 0.09 l/h (1.5 ml/min) in the severe renal impairment groups. Although the total amount of eslicarbazepine recovered in urine until 72 h post-dose was similar in the control and mild renal impairment groups, a decrease was found in the moderate and severe renal impairment groups. Major metabolites recovered in urine were eslicarbazepine and its glucuronide form. Clearance of minor metabolites (R-licarbazepine, oxcarbazepine and their glucuronides) was also dependent on renal function. In patients with end-stage renal disease, dialysis was effective in removing the ESL metabolites from the circulation., Conclusions: ESL metabolites are excreted primarily by renal route and their clearance is dependent on renal function. ESL dosage adjustment may be necessary in patients with a creatinine clearance <60 ml/min.

Objective: To investigate the dosage form proportionality and food effect of the final tablet formulation of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in healthy volunteers., Methods: This was a randomized, three-way crossover, single-centre study in 18 healthy volunteers. Subjects received a single dose of oral ESL 800 mg following a standard meal in one period, and following 10 hours of fasting in two separate periods (in the form of one 800 mg tablet [reference] or two 400 mg tablets [test]). The statistical method was based upon the 90% confidence interval (CI) of maximum observed plasma drug concentration (C(max)), area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) from time zero to the last sampling time at which concentrations were at or above the lower limit of quantification (AUC(t)) and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC(infinity)) geometric means ratios (GMRs) of BIA 2-005, the enantiomeric mixture of the ESL active metabolite eslicarbazepine and its enantiomer R-licarbazepine. Bioequivalence was assumed when the 90% CI of the test/reference GMR fell within the bioequivalence acceptance interval (80.00, 125.00)., Results: Following a single dose of ESL 800 mg in the forms of two 400 mg tablets and one 800 mg tablet, the test/reference GMR (%) and 90% CI for C(max), AUC(t) and AUC(infinity) were 100.78% (93.91, 108.16), 100.37% (97.82, 102.99) and 100.48% (97.91, 103.13), respectively. Following administration of one 800 mg tablet in fed (test) and fasting (reference) conditions, the test/reference GMR and 90% CI for C(max), AUC(t) and AUC(infinity) were 100.96% (94.08, 108.35), 96.79% (94.34, 99.32) and 96.75% (94.27, 99.29), respectively. Treatments were well tolerated., Conclusions: The bioequivalence criteria between the ESL 400 mg and 800 mg tablets were met and dosage form proportionality was demonstrated. The presence of food had no influence on ESL pharmacokinetics, indicating that ESL can be administered without regard to meals with no significant effects on drug disposition or extent of systemic exposure.

The topical application of 0.1% olopatadine has been shown to provide significant attenuation of histamine-induced conjunctival vascular permeability (CVP) within 5 min and for as long as 24 h following a topical administration. The duration of the action of olopatadine was compared to that of epinastine, azelastine, and ketotifen. Male Hartley outbred guinea pigs (weighing 250-300 g) were administered a drug or vehicle as single O.D. topical drops, at times ranging from 4 to 24 h prior to histamine challenge. One (1) h prior to histamine challenge, the animals were administered 1 mL of Evans blue dye (1 mg/mL) through the marginal ear vein. Histamine (300 ng) was administered by a subconjunctival injection, and the guinea pigs were sacrificed 30 min later. CVP was assessed as the area and color intensity stained with Evans blue dye. The potencies of each drug were determined by calculating a 50% effective dose (ED(50)) for the inhibition of vascular leakage, compared to vehicle treatment, at each time point. Olopatadine was the only compound tested that was significantly effective 16 h following a single topical application. The ED(50) for olopatadine at 16 h was 0.031%. Epinastine, azelastine, and ketotifen were only significantly effective for up to 4 h. Olopatadine exhibited the longest duration of action for inhibition of histamine-induced vascular permeability in guinea pigs of any topical antiallergic drug tested. Concentrations of olopatadine, which provided a greater than 50% inhibition of the histamine-induced vascular response, were consistently less than 0.1% over a 16-h pretreatment interval.

Purpose: To determine the effect of gender on the pharmacokinetics of eslicarbazepine acetate, a novel voltage-gated sodium channel blocker in the development for the treatment of epilepsy and bipolar disorder., Methods: Single-centre, open-label, parallel-group study in 12 female and 12 male healthy subjects. The study consisted of a single-dose (600 mg) period and a multiple-dose (600 mg, once-daily, for 8 days) period, separated by 4 days., Results: Eslicarbazepine acetate was rapidly and extensively metabolized to eslicarbazepine (S-licarbazepine), the main active metabolite. Following a single-dose, arithmetic mean eslicarbazepine maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 h (AUC(0-24)) and from 0 to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) were, respectively, 9.3 microg/ml, 128.5 microg h/ml and 171.9 microg h/ml in male subjects and 10.1 microg/ml, 150.1 microg h/ml and 205.0 microg h/ml in female subjects. At steady-state, C(max), AUC(0-24) and AUC(0-infinity) were 15.5 microg/ml, 207.8 microg h/ml and 295.8 microg h/ml in male subjects, and 16.8 microg/ml, 214.5 microg h/ml and 295.2 microg h/ml in female subjects. Steady-state plasma concentrations were attained at 4 to 5 days of administration in both groups. Eslicarbazepine C(max), AUC(0-24) and AUC(0-infinity) female:male geometric mean ratios (90%CI) were, respectively, 1.09 (0.94; 1.24), 1.16 (1.00; 1.33) and 1.17 (0.99; 1.38) following single-dose, and 1.10 (0.97; 1.25), 1.04 (0.92; 1.17) and 1.01 (0.88; 1.16) at steady-state., Conclusion: At steady-state, the pharmacokinetic profile of eslicarbazepine acetate was not affected by gender., (Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

To increase the skin permeation of quinupramine through the rat skin, different types of enhancers were added to an ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) matrix containing 2% quinupramine. The effects of the enhancers on the level of quinupramine permeation through the skin were evaluated by using Franz diffusion cells that were fitted with the intact excised rat skin. Among the enhancers used, which included fatty acids (saturated and unsaturated), glycerides, pyrrolidones, and nonionic surfactants, polyoxyethylene-2-oleyl ether showed the best enhancement. The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of quinupramine from an EVA matrix were examined to determine the level of percutaneous absorption in rats. The percutaneous absorption of quinupramine from the EVA matrix with or without an enhancer was investigated. Quinupramine was administered orally or intravenously to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters with that of the transdermal route. The relative bioavailability of quinupramine in the matrix containing polyoxyethylene-2-oleyl ether as an enhancer was approximately 2.81 times higher than the group without an enhancer. Histological examination revealed that the skin pretreated with the EVA matrix containing the enhancers had a loosely layered stratum corneum. These results show that the quinupramine-EVA matrix containing a permeation enhancer could be a good transdermal delivery system for providing sustained plasma concentrations.

Although the pharmacological profiles and clinical efficacy of antihistamines for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), one of the representative cutaneous pruritic diseases, have been well documented, the in vivo concentrations of antihistamines in human skin have previously been studied in less detail. In this randomized trial, the suction blister technique was applied to the measurement of the concentrations of epinastine hydrochloride in the extracellular water compartment in comparison with chlorpheniramine maleate in skin from AD patients. A total of 79 patients (mean age, 28.6 years) were randomly allocated to receive either 20 mg of epinastine or 6 mg of chlorpheniramine. Suction blisters were induced on both upper arms in all patients, and blister fluid was obtained for the measurement of concentrations of the 2 test agents by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Epinastine concentrations in 42 samples were 5.02-33.07 ng/mL (mean +/- SD, 14.08 +/- 10.51; median, 7.00), demonstrating that epinastine is distributed to the skin in high concentrations equal to the levels found in plasma and sufficient to exert its variety of pharmacological modes of action. In contrast, chlorpheniramine concentrations in all 37 samples were below the lower limit of quantification (< 0.5 ng/mL). Corresponding to these pharmacological results, a significant decrease of pruritus was observed in AD patients administered epinastine compared with chlorpheniramine. Hence epinastine is likely to be more effective clinically than chlorpheniramine in AD. This is the first report for the determination of in vivo local drug levels of antihistamines in the skin from AD patients.

An ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) matrix containing quinupramine was prepared in an attempt to develop a controlled delivery system for quinupramine. Permeation studies of quinupramine through the EVA copolymer membrane were carried out using a two-chamber diffusion cell. The rate of drug permeation through the EVA membrane was proportional to the PEG 400 volume fraction. The release of quinupramine from the EVA matrix was examined using a modified Franz diffusion cell. A plasticizer was added to prepare the pore structure of the EVA matrix in order to increase the rate of drug release. The effects of PEG 400, membrane thickness, drug concentration, temperature, and plasticizer on drug release rate were investigated. The drug release rate from the EVA matrix increased with increasing PEG 400 volume fraction, temperature and drug loading dose. The activation energy for drug release was 5.91, 5.39, 4.68 and 4.52 kcal/mol for a loading dose of 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, and 2%, respectively. Among the plasticizers used, diethyl phthalate showed the best results. The release of quinupramine from the EVA matrix follows a diffusion-controlled model, where the quantity released per unit area is proportional to the square root of time. The controlled release of quinupramine was achieved using the EVA polymer including a plasticizer.

Purpose: To investigate the bioavailability and bioequivalence of three different formulations of eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093): 50 mg/mL oral suspension (test 1), 200mg tablets (test 2) and 800mg tablets (reference)., Design, Subjects and Methods: Single-centre, open-label, randomised, three-way crossover study in 18 healthy subjects. The study consisted of three consecutive periods separated by a washout period of 7 days or more. Each subject received a single dose of eslicarbazepine acetate 800mg on three different occasions: 16mL of oral 50 mg/mL suspension, four 200mg tablets or one 800mg tablet., Results: Eslicarbazepine acetate was rapidly and extensively metabolised to BIA 2-005. Maximum BIA 2-005 plasma concentrations (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinfinity) were, respectively (arithmetic mean +/- SD), 18.0 +/- 4.6 microg/mL and 325.7 +/- 64.9 microg x h/mL for test 1, 16.0 +/- 4.0 microg/mL and 304.2 +/- 66.0 microg x h/mL for test 2, and 17.0 +/- 4.1 microg/mL and 301.1 +/- 60.0 microg x h/mL for the reference formulation. Point estimate (PE) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for AUCinfinity test 1/reference geometric mean ratio were 1.09 and 1.01, 1.15; for Cmax ratio, PE and 90% CI were 1.07 and 0.97, 1.15. When test 2 and the reference formulations were compared, the PE and 90% CI were 0.99 and 0.94, 1.07 for the AUCinfinity ratio, and 0.94 and 0.86, 1.02 for the Cmax ratio. Bioequivalence of test versus reference formulations is thus accepted for both AUCinfinity and Cmax because the 90% CIs lie within the acceptance range of 0.80-1.25., Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic profiles of eslicarbazepine acetate oral 50 mg/mL suspension, 200mg tablet and 800mg tablet formulations were essentially similar, and the formulations can be considered bioequivalent.