Search

Despite lower‐troposphere wind flow being a major control of rainfall in equatorial Africa, no studies have systematically compared winds from multiple reanalyses nor have attempted to validate the wind directions. Therefore, the objectives of this study are to assess differences in wind directions among multiple reanalysis products and compare reanalysis winds with wind measurements made at weather stations. The study region is western Uganda, part of the transition region between western equatorial Africa (WEA) and eastern equatorial Africa (EEA). Four‐times daily (i.e., 0Z, 6Z, 12Z and 18Z) 10‐m and 850‐hPa winds from 1980 to 2021 are obtained for ECMWF Reanalysis v5 (ERA5), Japan Meteorological Agency 55‐year Reanalysis (JRA55), Modern‐Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications Version 2 (MERRA2), NCEP‐NCAR Reanalysis 1 (R1) and NCEP/DOE Reanalysis II (R2). Wind measurements at 10 m and 850 hPa are obtained for six weather stations and two weather stations, respectively. Agreements between pairs of products and between measurements and reanalysis estimates are determined. In addition, differences between reanalyses and measurements with respect to wind vectors are calculated. Results show that the majority of reanalyses have western Uganda within the prevailing easterly flow over EEA and east of the prevailing westerly flow over WEA. Ten‐meter wind measurements also show easterly flow being prevalent throughout western Uganda. R1 is unique among the products due to a relatively large number of westerly days. However, much of the westerly flow is likely artificial, based on station data. MERRA2 has large easterly biases. JRA55 is much more accurate than the other products at reproducing the intra‐annual frequencies of wind directions. JRA55 and ERA5 are the least biased products based on the magnitudes of difference vectors. Therefore, it is recommended that JRA55 and ERA5 continue to be used in examinations of winds in western Uganda. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Urbanization introduces new and alters the existing hydrological processes. Projecting the direction and magnitude of change of evapotranspiration (ET), often a large existing process, in humid subtropical climates is difficult due to the lack of land‐cover specific estimates of ET. This research aims to improve our fundamental understanding of ET in urban areas by focusing on ET specific to land‐cover classes of the National Land Cover Database (NLCD). Using multiple physically based models along with ET from reference watersheds, this study estimates ET—within the Atlanta, GA, USA region—for NLCD classes. ET also is estimated for urban watersheds—both in the Atlanta region and in areas with humid subtropical climate types—for which published ET estimates exist. There are major differences in land cover among the four developed classes: high‐intensity developed land is 92% impervious surfaces, while open‐space developed land—the least intensively developed land—is only 8% impervious surfaces. Consequently, open‐space developed land has an ET total that is over four times that of high‐intensity developed land. Due to a high percentage of impervious cover and substantial evaporation of water from impervious surfaces throughout the year, there is little intra‐annual variation in ET for the high‐intensity developed class. The land‐cover ET totals aggregate to reliable estimates for urban watersheds. The largest source of uncertainty for ET estimates in urban areas is likely the evaporation magnitude associated with impervious surfaces; therefore, more work is needed in determining those magnitudes for humid subtropical climates. Key Points: Evapotranspiration (ET) varies greatly among developed land‐cover classes in a humid subtropical climateET totals specific to land‐cover classes aggregate to reliable estimates for urban watershedsThe largest source of uncertainty for urban ET estimates is likely the magnitude of evaporation from impervious surfaces [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article explores the possibility of urbanization- and irrigation-induced increases in summer precipitation totals in central Arizona. Maximum precipitation impacts are hypothesized to occur downwind of the Phoenix area in the Lower Verde basin. Results from statistical tests indicate that summer precipitation totals in the Lower Verde basin are greater than totals in nearby basins. Precipitation totals in the basin also appear to be equivalent to totals at more monsoon-impacted stations in eastern Arizona. While this research is preliminary, the results do provide encouraging evidence of the existence of anthropogenically enhanced summer precipitation in central Arizona. Key Words: Arizona, irrigation, Phoenix, precipitation, urbanization.

The article identifies different types of air pollution associated with different types of vehicles and equipment for the Tucson, Arizona, metropolitan area. High levels of nitrogen oxides were linked to on-road motor vehicles, while volatile organic compounds were linked to residential wood combustion and lawn and garden equipment usage.

This article addresses the need to better understand the complex interactions between climate, human activities, vegetation responses, and surface ozone so that more informed air-quality policy recommendations can be made. The impacts of intraseasonal climate variations on ozone levels in Tucson, Arizona from April through September of 1995 to 1998 are determined by relating variations in ozone levels to variations in atmospheric conditions and emissions of ozone's precursor chemicals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (N[O.sub.x]), and by determining month-specific atmospheric conditions that are conducive to elevated ozone levels. Results show that the transport of ozone and its precursor chemicals within the Tucson area causes the highest ozone levels to be measured at a down-wind monitor. The highest ozone levels occur in August, due in part to the presence of the North American monsoon. Atmospheric conditions conducive to elevated ozone concentrations differ substantially between the arid foresummer (May and June) and the core monsoon months (July and August). Transport of pollution from Phoenix may have a substantial impact on elevated ozone concentrations during April, May, and June, while El Paso/Ciudad Juarez-derived pollution may contribute significantly to elevated ozone concentrations in August and September. Two broad policy implications derive from this work. Regional pollutant transport, both within the U.S. and between the U.S. and Mexico, is a potential issue that needs to be examined more intensively in future studies. In addition, spatiotemporal variations in sensitivities of ozone production require the adoption of both N[O.sub.x] and VOC control measures to reduce ozone levels in the Tucson area. Key Words: air pollution, climate, environmental policy, ozone, Southwest.